| gals are call sluts and guys get congratulated Posted: 1/7/2008 6:22:22 AM | "Maybe that's why men who get one-night stands are respected more than the women- because men have to work for them"
^^^ Is that really true? Because the girls that Ive known who are happy to sleep with random men are not the kind of women that you have to 'work for'.....
The girls that you DO work for are the ones that dont give 'it' so easily... and If ANY man thinks its wrong to sleep with a girl because they have mislead them with false emotions and crap then they are sadly mislead themselves. Anyone who has some self respect does not sleep with a man on a first date anyway regardless of what yarns they have spun them....
"label other women who sleep around as sluts" - kinda are, arnt they? | |
|
| gals are call sluts and guys get congratulated Posted: 1/7/2008 6:39:48 AM | ^^^ Where are these girls you don't have to 'work for'? I've certainly not met too many of them in my life-time.
If a woman wants to sleep with a guy on the first date is that anyone else's business? Who are you to label them sluts? | |
|
| gals are call sluts and guys get congratulated Posted: 1/7/2008 6:51:40 AM | Im the person who can refer them to the Genito-Urinary clinic when they have a yellow-brown discharge and itching or warts or any other kind of infection that has to be screened and swabbed...
Sorry, too graphic for you?
and.... "Where are these girls you don't have to 'work for'? I've certainly not met too many of them in my life-time"
It depends on what you mean by 'work for' doesnt it? - Buying a drink for a girl is hardly what I would call 'work for'....
If people want to be sexually promiscuous, go ahead.... but I'll call them what I like. Im nobody Sapphire, just someone who is deeper than a tea spoon and is slightly richer in moral fibre than the average girl who's happy to be had by anything with a *ock..... | |
|
| gals are call sluts and guys get congratulated Posted: 1/7/2008 7:07:07 AM | "I want to have sex with you." = insulting. Sounds pretty complimenting in my opinion.
would saying "I want to make passionate love to you" to a woman sound any better???
I wouldn't refer to her as being a slut for having many one nighters (as long as she is single and not seeing someone exclusive). Seems to me she is engaging in a recreational activity that appeals to her. And I would bet the farm that the guys she is engaging in the activity with in no way considers her a slut.
Now would I jump in the sack with someone I knew sleeps around like that? The answer would be No. She may take her chances catching more than she bargained for, but I wouldn't. It's not the quantity.... but the quality that counts! | |
|
| gals are call sluts and guys get congratulated Posted: 1/7/2008 7:13:03 AM | | bona dea, most women wouldn't date a guy without any sexual experience yet they criticize men who sleep with "sluts." Make up your minds. The only way some guys can get any sexual experience in the first place is to sleep with women who put out easily. It's possible for a guy to be well into his 30s or 40s without ever having found a serious relationship. If men saved sex only for serious relationships some of them would be virgins for the rest of their lives. Not a happy thought. | |
|
| gals are call sluts and guys get congratulated Posted: 1/7/2008 7:23:50 AM | "bona dea, most women wouldn't date a guy without any sexual experience yet they criticize men who sleep with "sluts." Make up your minds. The only way some guys can get any sexual experience in the first place is to sleep with women who put out easily. It's possible for a guy to be well into his 30s or 40s without ever having found a serious relationship. If men saved sex only for serious relationships some of them would be virgins for the rest of their lives. Not a happy thought"
Im sorry but you have just typed a complete and utter load of tosh.
Most women wouldnt date a guy without sexual experience? What the hell are you on feller?
Your not there to get experience to please a girl... and vice versa.... What happened to experiencing things together? what's wrong with that?
If you sleep around sapphire, im sorry but I couldnt think of a bigger turn-off.... now If you'd a a few serious partners and I was with you, I would be looking forward to learning and experiencing things together.... not doing things that you'd learned whilst doing it with other people..... Urrh.....
You have it all wrong my friend.
So what your saying is - that you sleep with sluts to get some experience in for the girl that might date you? no! no! no! ....
Someone with self respect is more of a turn-on than someone who's shagg*d about Im afraid.... | |
|
| gals are call sluts and guys get congratulated Posted: 1/7/2008 7:37:16 AM | | Women have different opinions about male virgins but the general consensus seems to be that most of them wouldn't want one. Ideally they want someone who has had a few serious partners rather than someone who sleeps around with sluts. But not every guy has had the opportunity to have a serious relationship- some people never find it in their entire lifetimes. What do you want these poor blokes to do who haven't even had the opportunity to get their hearts broken a few times? Live a life of celibacy because no good woman is interested in them? | |
|
| gals are call sluts and guys get congratulated Posted: 1/7/2008 7:57:36 AM | Im sorry but If someone has NEVER had any kind of a relationship with a woman before or if they have never had a serious relationship - there is something wrong with them.
They are either looking for the wrong woman or they have some kind of social disorder.....
Using some common tart is an excuse.... - Use your hand for god's sake, at least you know where it's been. | |
|
| gals are call sluts and guys get congratulated Posted: 1/7/2008 8:05:16 AM |
Im sorry but If someone has NEVER had any kind of a relationship with a woman before or if they have never had a serious relationship - there is something wrong with them.
Says who? I've never had a serious relationship with a woman. I don't think there's anything wrong with me. I'm tired of people telling me that I'm so abnormal. There is no such thing as normal. | |
|
| gals are call sluts and guys get congratulated Posted: 1/7/2008 8:14:05 AM | ^^^ and Is it completely true that there is nothing wrong with you Sapphire? the comment I made earlier with regards to social disorders....
An ASD is nothing to be ashamed of and people need to be educated about it... the people that tell you that you are not normal are clearly not in the 'educated' category and really dont deserve your attentions.....
Wow, hasnt this thread taken a strange twist? lol
There is always a reason for something..... x And there is nothing that cant be dealt with x | |
|
| gals are call sluts and guys get congratulated Posted: 1/7/2008 8:26:36 AM | | I've never had a serious relationship before either, and it's not because I don't want one. There must be something wrong with me too, according to bona dea's skewed and irrelevant perspective. | |
|
| gals are call sluts and guys get congratulated Posted: 1/7/2008 8:30:57 AM | | When you guys are saying never had a serious relationship, are you saying you've never managed to date the same girl beyond 3 months? Or are you talking you've never moved in? Or are you talking never been married? I count monogamous dating for a decent period of time as a serious relationship even if it doesn't lead to marriage eventually. | |
|
| gals are call sluts and guys get congratulated Posted: 1/7/2008 8:38:04 AM | ^^^ thats my interpretation of a relationship too.... something beyond 3 months thats not just about getting yer rocks off....
I guess it depends on what people's definition of a proper relationship is really...
And dont worry James your only 23 (If you go by chinese mental age grading your actually only 16)... Still have a lot of growing up to do apparently... And your still in the shaggi*g sluts stage if we are to be totally generalistic.... | |
|
| gals are call sluts and guys get congratulated Posted: 1/7/2008 8:41:47 AM |
And dont worry James your only 23 (If you go by chinese mental age grading your actually only 16)... Still have a lot of growing up to do apparently... And your still in the shaggi*g sluts stage if we are to be totally generalistic.... You don't know anything about me, yet you claim to. A sure sign of a moron. | |
|
| gals are call sluts and guys get congratulated Posted: 1/7/2008 8:51:28 AM | ^^^ You don't know anything about me, yet you claim to. A sure sign of a moron.
Yep, just like when you call people skewed for sharing their opinion and knowledge.....
My posts were not directed towards you, they were replies to Sapphire... And as you cannot see his profile, you dont actually know what the conversation what really about...
So how about you stop assuming other people's comments are skewed and I wont class you an an infantile little boy with the intelligence of a nats arse.... eh? x | |
|
| gals are call sluts and guys get congratulated Posted: 1/7/2008 9:17:08 AM | Personally I took "just sex" as literal, meaning sex without anything else (dates, phone calls, intimacy, any type of promise or relationship, etc.) but that's just me, I tend to be literal and clinical when I see stuff like that.
Ok why don't I respond to more than just the paragraph referring to me, I'd hate to be a narcissist.
Well, you're getting somewhere. It's dubbed as the **** cartel among us cynics of the sexual dynamic. In spite of the lip service to "equality" that so many preach, especially Western women, we are witnessing everything but that. If it wasn't true, getting laid really wouldn't be that big of a deal, and women wouldn't be so hung up on this stuff. Men like sex, but we're supposed to feel grateful when it comes our way; if a woman is half way decent looking, outgoing, and fun to be with, her chances or getting rejected are far lower than a man of equivalent status, and obtaining sex is easier. She can be picky or slutty when she wants. Many men cannot. I guess that's true, but I don't look at it as something men should be grateful for - sure it's easier to get for women, but if men all decided to hold out and band together for a month or two, then we might actually look for it, try to get it, and we might even sleep with men we're not all THAT jazzed about to get it. You're going to have a tough time competing with toys tho.
Let's face it, the reason men are after it and women are gatekeeping is that women would rather sleep with someone she likes, is involved with, and actually knows for more than 10 minutes - men aren't wired that way. Most would pull over and hussle a random woman walking the street (not professionally of course, that would be degrading) for sex if it were offered. That's not good or bad, it just is what it is, thus, we have the sexual dynamic we have.
And this is one reason why some men simply give up on pleasing women and start learning player tactics. They found at that being honorably and men of integrity doesn't get them anywhere with women, and that all their efforts are either in vain or outright exploited. Since the "price" of sex is so high, why not keep bouncing from one woman to the next until they've found success? Why pay for the milk if you can get the cow for free? There's a good volume of double standards with women concerning sex, and many men are discovering this even if they can't articulate it: the average Jane isn't that bad to many men, but the average Joe is boring and not good enough for many women. I do agree with this, since to me men are compartmentalized as well - can't say I want the full relationship with guys either - so I sort of get it, even if it's in reverse.
xeno was right about it. Women generally aren't terribly interested in men that are deemed as average Joes, and this includes average Janes. They "give" themselves more readily to men that have status, social networks, looks, security, and money while criticizing both slacker and worker bee men. Cry stereotype all you like, alpha males at the top of the heap have no shortage of willing women standing in line, even if they are married. There are certain women that would never do porn-style type of sex with men they consider lesser than them on the scale---even ones of their socioeconomic bracket. That would be "degrading" even though they are roughly still equal in most traits. But a man with minor celebrity status, it's another story. This one I can't comment on - I won't date or sleep with someone I'm not attracted to, but beyond that I don't care what he has as long as he's not married, the rest isn't really relevant to me. I also don't really like aggressive, egotistical, or pushy men regardless of looks, so the whole alpha thing isn't generally for me.
For most men, they are still having to work for women's attention, although we are not supposed to be desperate or act aloof and cool in the process. It's a catch-22 situation, as usual. As much as men don't always say it, women wonder why men are resentful when it comes to "getting lucky," for a good bulk of women, it doesn't involve luck at all---as one poster rightly observed, women just have to show up and be in the mood. Your average Joe shows up and is in the mood, many women will just say, "So what; I can get that when I want. You're not that interesting." That's true. I agree with this...men like to let me know I am doable in case I was wondering, and most times I either yawn at this, or it wasn't something I was even in the mindset to want to hear.
And despite what some women are saying, they reward players and talk "sex shop" when they believe no man is looking or playing attention. And lots of women *like* players and they are full of shit when they complain that they don't like them; womanizers produce drama, something to talk about with female peers, excitement. Even emotional pain is a high that's better than nothing for attention-whoring women. If anyone reads this doesn't believe me, you're either naive or in denial. I truly don't like players, but that's because I like to call the shots, and was a player myself at a younger age. I sort of know the tricks...if I sleep with a man, it wasn't his idea, it's more something I want and he agrees with - although he might not really argue or fight it (that thing you mentioned earlier about "luck" I guess).
And as much as I like UglyBetty, she has a wrong idea about men. Since women see men are normally active and taking charge of things, they also believe that men can get sex almost as easily as they can. Or when they instinctively realize they are still the gatekeepers of sex (with the exception of the alphas at the apex, which get to choose when and who they want), they play games with men and get men to jump hoops for them with the lure of sex, and can change their minds in mid-stream---"Hey buddy, you're a perv, thats NOT what I meant" in order to get what they want. Or give in to someone else when the bigger, better deal comes along and dump her last beau unceremoniously. I don't believe men can get sex in the same way women can, any more than I think they want the same sex women do. But I do believe there are ways men can satisfy that need if they want to. If I say to a guy "pay for it", I'm not trying to be insulting. Someone in another thread (Ukobalt maybe?) posted something along the lines of not wanting to pay for sex because they know the woman's only doing it because he's paying. Well, you can't really get laid and start complaining about the details of it...the plus side is you don't have to call her back, you don't have to take her out, no one has to know. Who cares if she really likes you? Do you think a woman you just met in a club will know you? Dating women and even picking up a random chick in a bar costs money, so I know that can't be the complaint. Sex is sex right? Then just take it already. lol
I know the whole "use sex as a lure" thing isn't directed at me, because sex happens when I want it to - or it doesn't happen. I'm never confused about it, and most of my exes will tell you that. Do I expect it when I ask for it? Yes - if you don't want to give it to me, will I threaten to get it elsewhere? You bet. But I don't promise without delivering - although my business is all import and not much export.
Of course, by implication, women being the gatekeepers of sex means they are still perceived as sexually more powerful, but can (and still) abuse that power. Funny how feminists claim women have little or no power in the sexual realm, but feed that status quo with complete adherence to it. I don't tease or withhold sex, because I usually want it as much as or more than the person I am with. Withholding means I don't get any either, so to me it's dumb. I suppose if I didn't care if I had sex, it would work better for me, but since that's not the case, I don't really do it. | |
|
| |
| gals are call sluts and guys get congratulated Posted: 1/7/2008 9:24:27 AM |
Im sorry but If someone has NEVER had any kind of a relationship with a woman before or if they have never had a serious relationship - there is something wrong with them.
Of course, you would make that false premise, bona dea. Either that, or you would claim that man is being too judgmental, picky, or looking for women "out of his league" even though he might be a good catch for them. It's always the man's fault.
The fact of the matter there are women with too much baggage or serous problems themselves doesn't always occur to some posters here, and why should a man simply get involved when it's not in his best interest? When a guy does show self-respect and doesn't sleep with every women that offers him "some," he's often condemned as if "there is something wrong with them" even though it's entirely possible he possesses his own standards.
And if a woman were to not be in a serious relationship herself, it's often justified---she's waiting for the right one, or will not settle. | |
|
| gals are call sluts and guys get congratulated Posted: 1/7/2008 9:28:30 AM | Hang on, hang on! your getting hold of the wrong end of the stick.... We are not talking about a man who's been single for a good amount of time or someone that's waiting for the 'right one'. It is perfectly normal to have a relationship with someone by the time your 40....
What I think is not normal is someone in their 30/40's who has NEVER had a relationship with a woman outside of one night stands....
Now, is this you? If not..... give it a rest x | |
|
| gals are call sluts and guys get congratulated Posted: 1/7/2008 9:31:15 AM | bona dea, msg 67:
Yep, just like when you call people skewed for sharing their opinion and knowledge.....
My posts were not directed towards you, they were replies to Sapphire... And as you cannot see his profile, you dont actually know what the conversation what really about...
So how about you stop assuming other people's comments are skewed and I wont class you an an infantile little boy with the intelligence of a nats arse.... eh? I didn't assume anything based on what you said in msg 60:
Im sorry but If someone has NEVER had any kind of a relationship with a woman before or if they have never had a serious relationship - there is something wrong with them.
| |
|
| gals are call sluts and guys get congratulated Posted: 1/7/2008 9:35:11 AM |
ut I do believe there are ways men can satisfy that need if they want to. If I say to a guy "pay for it", I'm not trying to be insulting. Someone in another thread (Ukobalt maybe?) posted something along the lines of not wanting to pay for sex because they know the woman's only doing it because he's paying. Well, you can't really get laid and start complaining about the details of it...the plus side is you don't have to call her back, you don't have to take her out, no one has to know. Who cares if she really likes you? Do you think a woman you just met in a club will know you? Dating women and even picking up a random chick in a bar costs money, so I know that can't be the complaint. Sex is sex right? Then just take it already. lol
Because men "paying for it" is a basic admission that it's prostitution, but that's too politically incorrect for many to handle.
because sex happens when I want it to - or it doesn't happen.
You're basically entering my argument which I outlined; men who want sex when they want don't always get it. Women who do have to show up and be in the mood.
Who cares if she really likes you?
Well I have lower inclinations for social approval (this is from personality tests I've done) than your "average" person, what women think of a man can make or break his social standing and even effect his sex life. Why? Because with women is a high priority. They usually don't sleep with a men that their social circle doesn't approve of always they are temporarily rebelling or seeking attention and drama, or will not talk about getting banged by a janitor that was "hot" but would reap scorn by their peers.
Do I expect it when I ask for it? Yes - if you don't want to give it to me, will I threaten to get it elsewhere?
Again, you re-affirm what I was saying. A decent looking and worldly woman has little problems getting action from another man, even on the same night, whereas most men have to deal with longer periods of finding someone else, unless they have a network of available and willing women. Many men don't have this at all. | |
|
| gals are call sluts and guys get congratulated Posted: 1/7/2008 9:37:34 AM | "I've never had a serious relationship before either, and it's not because I don't want one. There must be something wrong with me too, according to bona dea's skewed and irrelevant perspective"
You make yourself a victim James.... I'd just stop trying to make an intellectual comment on the matter if you have nothing constructive to add.... Its obviously out-stretching your intelligence to think of something worthwhile to say rather than calling people 'moron', 'skewed' or 'stupid'....
Why bother? Silly boy. | |
|
| gals are call sluts and guys get congratulated Posted: 1/7/2008 9:38:47 AM |
Now, is this you? If not..... give it a rest x
Typical knee jerk reaction that's bordering a personal attack. I don't need to prove myself to you, and explain that I've already had relationships to gain your approval.
Get off your high horse.
Women will even shun men do prove to themselves someone is weird or a creep, even if he's nothing of the sort. It takes a long time for men to remove that stigma, even if he's worthy of a healthy relationship. | |
|
| gals are call sluts and guys get congratulated Posted: 1/7/2008 9:39:58 AM |
You make yourself a victim James.... I'd just stop trying to make an intellectual comment on the matter if you have nothing constructive to add.... Its obviously out-stretching your intelligence to think of something worthwhile to say rather than calling people 'moron', 'skewed' or 'stupid'....
Why bother? Silly boy. Congratulations, you're an idiot. | |
|
| gals are call sluts and guys get congratulated Posted: 1/7/2008 9:40:39 AM | ^^^ Is this really true? Yes, I am very cranky about not getting my sex, especially in a relationship - it's one of the main reasons I would even agree to be in one. I expect to get sex regularly, but by the time I get that serious with someone, he's already pretty aware of it. I think he has every right to say no for himself, but I don't believe for a second that because my SO doesn't feel like getting laid that I should go without as well.
Naturally it wouldn't be something I did right away, but after a considerable amount of time, I'd find someone who was interested - as in, I'd break it off. As many have stated earlier, there are too many other men who don't get enough sex to stay with one who doesn't want it. | |
|