| has anyone tried this?
Posted: 1/9/2008 7:40:33 PM | Oh geez........a man with no intuition! How rare!
How about screening on the phone? It works wonders!
Are you sending blanket e-mails, or individualized? Outmind...you are always sooo hilarious!
A wee bit too clinical for me.... There's something to be said for the adventure of not knowing if the attraction is mutual until that first face-to-face meeting So true.... The mouse that doesn't come is the smart one :)))! | |
|
| |
| has anyone tried this?
Posted: 1/9/2008 9:14:34 PM | OP there have been a lot of negative things said but lets take a logical look at your plan. If you are going to contact 60 women that are that close to you then they are close to themselves. Here in lies a problem, women talk to each other and chances are great more than one of them will know each other. Needless to say this may not be good since they like to exchange notes and may expose your plan before it reaches fruition. Though your plan may have merit it may need to be revised. If you were to meet one before work for coffee, one at lunch time for coffee, and one after work for a drink you could decrease your time line to 20 days. By doing so the chances of the women you are meeting talking to each other would decreases exponentially. I hope you will give this some consideration and find it helpful.
BTW, I would never try anything so crazy but if it works let us know ok?
 | |
|
| has anyone tried this?
Posted: 1/10/2008 10:04:14 AM | | Three mile area?? Yah right! That limits me to 2 or 3 women if I were lucky. Around here I have to read the legals in the paper to see who is getting a divorce so my odds might increase! | |
|
| has anyone tried this?
Posted: 1/11/2008 10:03:55 AM | Considering that the ONLY single, attractive and available females in my town
[1-mile square]
are _Still in High School_. . . .
I couldn't try the technique . . !
****
Do Raccoons Count . . ?? . . | |
|
| has anyone tried this?
Posted: 1/11/2008 1:31:23 PM | i guess 60 within a 3 mile radius isn't an impossibility . . . IF he lives in a 35 story condo tower . . . . and IF he is surrounded by 4 or 6 or 8 OTHER 35 story towers, then YES . . . . 60 within 3 miles is certainly not out of the question . . . .
here, fishie fishie . . . .  | |
|
| has anyone tried this?
Posted: 1/12/2008 7:56:23 AM |
*wipes the screen*
OP,
I hope this little plan was shared with us for entertainment value only.
If so - good job.
But, if you are serious about it - go and read posts 31 and 46. And then think long and hard about what they said.
I am not even going to open your profile and see how interesting/not interesting you are. But, to assume that every woman will say yes to a date , and with a guy who does not have a picture posted is either a sign of 1) delusion of grandeur or 2)... there is no 2.
Ok, I went to your profile.... could not resist ... ... Not much there OP. Lot's of Prefer not to Say, no picture and one line description.
Methinks expand the search criteria to 400 miles.
OR
Thanks for a good laugh. This was a good way to start the day... I suppose there ARE people who take this approach, after all.
Best of luck blanketing (or carpet bombing, if you wish).
 | |
|
| has anyone tried this?
Posted: 1/12/2008 8:10:40 AM | What ever floats your boat. That would limit me to one man to every 4 ..women...
Don't sound like fun to me. of course I believe in dating one man at a time... | |
|
| has anyone tried this?
Posted: 1/12/2008 6:23:13 PM |
But, to assume that every woman will say yes to a date , and with a guy who does not have a picture posted is either a sign of 1) delusion of grandeur or 2)... there is no 2.
Too funny, Red Cassandra! I checked out his profile after reading your post and I agree, reading it was like biting into a cotton ball...boring fluff, no taste and just plain annoying.
MS | |
|
Home
login 
