|
|
|
|
|
| Is there really a Second Coming? Posted: 1/10/2008 4:18:17 PM | The fact that Christ comes in a 'cloud' is used in scripture to reveals that His coming is spiritual and not physical...Cloud refers to spirit/moving air..
~ this one's way in left field Consigliere!! In Scripture--it is used exactly as it was intended to be used at the time of the writing..agreed? So when those gathered with Christ were viewing His Ascension--they literally watched as He rose up into heaven. The two witnesses then asked the following: "....ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven? this same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven." I don't know how much MORE literal you can get than that.
The Second Coming of Christ is "The Blessed Hope." Writing to Titus Paul said--"Looking for that 'Blessed Hope,' and the 'Glorious Appearing of the Great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ." Titus 2:13
Most Christians when speaking of their "Hope" mean their "Hope of Salvation," but we cannot "hope" for a thing we have and salvation is a present possession if we are trusting in Christ as our Saviour. The Christian's "Hope" then is the "Return of His Lord!!"
The world will never see Christ again.
What? This one is clearly out of the ball park IMO.
Matthew 25:31, 32:
"When the Son of Man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the "Throne of His Glory;" and before him shall be gathered all nations; and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats." | |
|
| Is there really a Second Coming? Posted: 1/10/2008 9:28:41 PM | ~ this one's way in left field Consigliere!! In Scripture--it is used exactly as it was intended to be used at the time of the writing..agreed? So when those gathered with Christ were viewing His Ascension--they literally watched as He rose up into heaven. The two witnesses then asked the following: "....ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven? this same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven." I don't know how much MORE literal you can get than that.
Does the literal intepretation mean that Christ was physical and then He turned spiritual when He ascended to the Father. And a literal reversal of this process would mean that Christ returns back again from the Spritual to descend into becoming a physical being again......?
Or is the literal interpretation that Christ enetered heaven as a Spirit, and if He comes back in the same way He enetred, He would literally have to come back in a Spiritual manner.
The Second Coming of Christ is "The Blessed Hope." Writing to Titus Paul said--"Looking for that 'Blessed Hope,' and the 'Glorious Appearing of the Great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ." Titus 2:13
Most Christians when speaking of their "Hope" mean their "Hope of Salvation," but we cannot "hope" for a thing we have and salvation is a present possession if we are trusting in Christ as our Saviour. The Christian's "Hope" then is the "Return of His Lord!!"
These christians that Paul was addressing were most likely waiting for the kingdom of Christ to be manifested and the Jewish religion/temple, to be destroyed, so that the persecutions they were living under would come to an end. It should be remembered that the enemies of the first church was the Jewish authorities. When you are waiting for the kingdom of Christ's grace to be put into authority because your fellow brethren are being tortured daily...then I think the 'hope' of the christian of that paticular time wouldn't be some rapture away in the sky, but would be for the Lord's justice and vengeance to be fulfilled upon thier enemies who were the Jewish authorities, in order they could serve the Lord without fear..
Luke 1 73the oath he swore to our father Abraham: 74to rescue us from the hand of our enemies, and to enable us to serve him without fear
Romans 11:28 As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies on your account; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs,
Matthew 25:31, 32:
"When the Son of Man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the "Throne of His Glory;" and before him shall be gathered all nations; and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats."
So, we see the straightforward separation of the accepted by God from those who are not accepted. The “sheep” are, of course, the Christians. 1 Peter 2:25 –
“For you were like sheep going astray, but now you have returned to the shepherd and overseer of your souls.” [NIV]
Part and parcel of this judgment, however, is the actual inheritance of the Kingdom of God by the “sheep.” We all know that an inheritance from a will can only be had once the testator has died (Hebrews 9:16-17). Also, the inheritance is given to the beneficiaries shortly after the death. The inheritance to the Christians was the Kingdom. Did they come into possession of the Kingdom? Yes, they did. As Daniel prophesied in Daniel 7:1 8–
“But the saints of the most high shall take the kingdom, and possess the kingdom for ever, even for ever and ever.’’
so we read in Hebrews 12:28 –
“Wherefore we receiving a kingdom which cannot be moved, let us have grace…”
and Colossians 1:12-13–
“Giving thanks to the Father, who has qualified you to share in the inheritance of the saints in the kingdom of light. For he has rescued us from the dominion of darkness and brought us into the kingdom of the Son he loves.” [NIV]
If the Kingdom came into their possession during these first times of the church, then we must assume that the judgment also has occurred. In 1 Peter 4:17, he says:
“For it is time for judgment to begin with the family of God; and if it begins with us, what will the outcome be for those who do not obey the gospel of God?” [NIV]
If this great judgment event has not yet begun, then God has not yet defeated all his enemies as we know that he has done. Evil would still have power over the Christian and the inheritance of the Kingdom would still be off in the future. We know, however, that this ultimate judgment began with that first generation of believers and it is an ongoing spiritual judgment that we are subject to today. It judges men on their belief in God and the kind of lives they choose to live on this planet.
In John 3:18 he says of Christ:
“Whoever believes in him is not condemned [literally: judged], but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son.” [NIV]
| |
|
| Is there really a Second Coming? Posted: 1/10/2008 10:42:02 PM | Firsty I think we would all agree that the following plain language (no allegory here) below took place.
(Mat 21:42 KJV) Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes? Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.
The Gentile church is being spoken off here
(Mat 21:45 KJV) And when the chief priests and Pharisees had heard his parables, they perceived that he spake of them.
Note here he obviously is speaking to the chief priests - and they very likely understood he was speaking to them.
(Mat 23:37 KJV) O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.
Quite plain language again - no allergory, easy to understand.
(Mat 24:1 KJV) And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to show him the buildings of the temple. And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.
Again quite plain language - no allegories.
(Mat 24:6 KJV) And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet. For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.
Plain language - no allergories.
(Mat 24:35 KJV) Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.
Prior to the above the are lots of figures of speech, parables and stories. Example :-
(Mat 25:1 KJV) Then shall the kingdom of heaven be likened unto ten virgins, which took their lamps, and went forth to meet the bridegroom.
He then states Heaven and earth will pass away. Why would Christ use the term heaven and earth to represent Jewish authorities (heavens) and the unbelieving Jewish peoples of Palestine (earth) ??
This makes no sense when he plainly spelled out to them that the kingdom would be taken from them and given to a nation/s (Gentiles)
It is possible there is more in the 24th and 35th chapters - possibly that another event in the future yet to be fulfilled.
And the heavens and earth spoken of by peter :-
(2 Pet 3:10 KJV) But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up. (2 Pet 3:12 KJV) Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat?
What allegory would suit the "elements"?? From Strongs
1) any first thing, from which the others belonging to some series or composite whole take their rise, an element, first principal
a) the letters of the alphabet as the elements of speech, not however the written characters, but the spoken sounds b) the elements from which all things have come, the material causes of the universe c) the heavenly bodies, either as parts of the heavens or (as others think) because in them the elements of man, life and destiny were supposed to reside d) the elements, rudiments, primary and fundamental principles of any art, science, or discipline 1) i.e. of mathematics, Euclid's geometry
Lets try and copy and paste only the points to be addressed rather that the whole of a posters post, otherwise the responses end up being overly long. | |
|
| Is there really a Second Coming? Posted: 1/10/2008 11:23:21 PM |
What allegory would suit the "elements"?? From Strongs
1) any first thing, from which the others belonging to some series or composite whole take their rise, an element, first principal
a) the letters of the alphabet as the elements of speech, not however the written characters, but the spoken sounds b) the elements from which all things have come, the material causes of the universe c) the heavenly bodies, either as parts of the heavens or (as others think) because in them the elements of man, life and destiny were supposed to reside d) the elements, rudiments, primary and fundamental principles of any art, science, or discipline 1) i.e. of mathematics, Euclid's geometry
Lets try and copy and paste only the points to be addressed rather that the whole of a posters post, otherwise the responses end up being overly long.
nevercanezzar
The 'elements' spoken of would be the law.
This is where an understanding of how 'ages' is applicaple in defining the difference between the end of the age of the law and the age of grace...
The Greek word for “elements” used here is “stoicheion.” According to Young’10, the literal meaning of the word is “elements, rudiments, first step.” The root of the word is “stoichos,” which refers to a straight ruler or rod, and is used to signify those who walk according to a straight rule. Throughout the New Testament this word is used to mean one thing. In Galatians 4:3, Paul wrote:
“Even so we, when we were children, were in bondage under the elements of the world.”
Paul is not saying that they once lived as slaves in caves under the ground. He is teaching that “we Jews” who are now heirs of Christ, were, before Christ, under the elements, or rudiments of the world. This was a world of people and the rudiments that they were under were the ordinances of the old Law of Moses. They were bound to or in bondage to that Law. It was the elementary way in which God interacted with his people. As Paul said in chapter 3:23-24 just prior:
“…The law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.”
The Law was the collection of rudiments, or elements, that the people lived by. The Christian brethren were warned not to return to those laws and ordinances. A little further on in chapter 4:9, Paul tells them:
“But now, after that ye have known God, or rather are known of God, how turn ye again to the weak and beggarly elements whereunto ye desire again to be in bondage?”
The word translated “elements” here is, again, “stoicheion” and was the Law that once kept these former Jews in bondage (because no man could keep that Law perfectly).
In Colossians 2:8,20, Paul warns the brethren of some of the Jewish scoffers:
“Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.”
“Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances?”
The word used here is also “stoicheion.” It was the old Law of Moses that Christians had left behind when “with Christ” they became “dead from the rudiments.” The Jewish world of people still following those rudiments and elements were still a physically live and powerful force, however, and this is the world that would be coming to a cataclysmic end!
In our passage in 2 Peter, we see these same “elements” melting away with fervent heat. It was the old Law which had constrained them that melted away. There is no justification for assigning this imagery to a presumed end of the physical universe.
What is the meaning of the symbol “fervent heat” or “fire”? The author of Hebrews tells us in Hebrews 12:29 –
“For our God is a consuming fire.”
It is the word and actions of God himself that would cause the Law and the followers of it to come to an end. Christ ended its religious authority by fulfilling it at the cross, and God destroyed the earthly manifestations of it in his coming in A.D. 70.
In the last part of verse 10 of our study passage, once the Jewish religious authorities (“heavens”) have passed away and the old Law of Moses was deactivated by God (“elements melt with fervent heat”), then:
“…the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.”
This symbol “earth” refers to the place of the prophecy – in this case Judea – and tells what would become of it in the times being prophesied. It would be burned up along with the “works that are therein.” What works were in the land of Judea at the time that the Romans destroyed that land? The Jewish nation was there and it was the Judaic culture, religion, and political system that was “burned up” in the actions of war in A.D. 70. The Bible does not speak of the physical destruction of this planet here or anywhere in the scriptures. In fact, it speaks of its permanence. The Psalmist wrote (Psalms 104:5) of God:
“Who laid the foundations of the earth, that it should not be removed forever.”
and Ecclesiastes 1:4 tells us:
“Generations come and generations go, but the earth remains forever” [NIV]
In this prophesied destruction of the “earth,” the subject of the destruction was being presented as a symbol.
In verses 11-12, Peter goes on to say:
“Since everything will be destroyed in this way, what kind of people ought you to be? You ought to live holy and godly lives as you look forward to the day of God and speed its coming.” [NIV]
The Christians were to be living righteous lives in the face of the adversities they were experiencing. They were looking forward with great eagerness to that “Day of God” which would bring them out from under the persecutions and make them victorious in Christ over all their enemies. This is what Peter means in verse 13, when he states
“But In keeping with his promise, we are looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth, the home of righteousness.” [NIV]
What promise was this? It was the promise of Luke 1:70-74, that they should be “delivered out of the hand of our enemies. The new heaven and earth are also symbols. The heavens are the new religious authority, sanctioned by God. The new earth is the place of that prophecy and the people who dwell there. That new authority and people are, as the Hebrew author tells us in chapter 12:23, the “general assembly and church of the first born” – a “kingdom which cannot be moved.” It was the Kingdom of God, the Church of Christ,’ which being established on Pentecost, was to be soon redeemed from its mortal earthly enemies. It was this victorious Church that Peter and the others were looking forward to – this new era of relationship with God where instead of unrighteous men wallowing in tradition, there would be only the “spirits of just men made perfect.” | |
|
| Is there really a Second Coming? Posted: 1/10/2008 11:42:26 PM | Thats all fine Consig - however ya didn't address the following :-
He then states Heaven and earth will pass away. Why would Christ use the term heaven and earth to represent Jewish authorities (heavens) and the unbelieving Jewish peoples of Palestine (earth) ??
This makes no sense when he plainly spelled out to them that the kingdom would be taken from them and given to a nation/s (Gentiles) | |
|
| Is there really a Second Coming? Posted: 1/10/2008 11:53:24 PM |
Thats all fine Consig - however ya didn't address the following :-
He then states Heaven and earth will pass away. Why would Christ use the term heaven and earth to represent Jewish authorities (heavens) and the unbelieving Jewish peoples of Palestine (earth) ??
This makes no sense when he plainly spelled out to them that the kingdom would be taken from them and given to a nation/s (Gentiles)
The gentiles received the kingdom of God and the message of grace shortly after the crucifixion on the cross. The temple was still in full operation in Jerusalem for almost a full generation, before it was destroyed, and the destruction of the temple is what ended the ability to practice the ordinances of the law. During this time the law was continually enticing new converts of Christ to fall away from faith, and keeping others from coming to Christ.
2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. | |
|
| Is there really a Second Coming? Posted: 1/11/2008 8:11:39 AM | | I think human evil (and a little help from hell) has been a constant obstacle to the second coming. ..and the biggest obstacle to the second coming has yet to come, but God's patience will run out for sure... | |
|
| Is there really a Second Coming? Posted: 1/11/2008 8:22:24 AM | | ironicaly, the second coming will be when we will have created the biggest obstacle ever to the return of the messiah... | |
|
| Is there really a Second Coming? Posted: 1/11/2008 12:31:51 PM | | Consigliero :- I was asking why Jesus plainly states in none allegorical language that the kingdom would be taken from them and given to another nation. And then switch to allegorical language of "heaven and earth" - what would be the point? - you never addressed that question. | |
|
| Is there really a Second Coming? Posted: 1/11/2008 2:30:30 PM |
Consigliero :- I was asking why Jesus plainly states in none allegorical language that the kingdom would be taken from them and given to another nation. And then switch to allegorical language of "heaven and earth" - what would be the point? - you never addressed that question.
nevercanezzar
Matthew 25 is completely allegorical. parables are not spoken in plain language and Jesus clearly tells the disciples that He teaches in parables to keep the secrets of the kingdom from their understandings, while only the disciples were given the ability to see and understand...
So your qustion is not really valid because both are allegorical...the parables and also the usage of heaven and earth....In fact the interpretation of heaven and earth centering completely on the religious system and the works it produces, is completely strengthened by the lessons in the parables. | |
|
| Is there really a Second Coming? Posted: 1/11/2008 2:44:30 PM | (Mat 21:42 KJV) Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes? Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.
Consig - above is the plain language I was talking about - why speak plainly of the kingdom be taken away and then switch to allegory (heaven and earth) in what appears to be the same discourse (chaps 21 -25). | |
|
| Is there really a Second Coming? Posted: 1/11/2008 5:42:29 PM | Well, as a man, I've never had an experience where I've come twice in one orgasm, but...
Oh wait, you mean Second Coming, with all the heirophantic capitalization, right?
Well, I think it's bunk.
~ David | |
|
| Is there really a Second Coming? Posted: 1/11/2008 8:24:48 PM | 1Cr 15:50 I declare to you, brothers, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God, nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable. Listen, I tell you a mystery: We will not all sleep, but we will all be changed – in a flash, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed. For the perishable must clothe itself with the imperishable, and the mortal with immortality. When the perishable has been clothed with the imperishable, and the mortal with immortality, then the saying that is written will come true: “Death has been swallowed up in victory.”
So what is this "last trumpet" when the dead are raised??
Mat 24:21 For then there will be great distress, unequaled from the beginning of the world until now – and never to be equaled again.
Mat 24:29 “Immediately after the distress of those days “ ‘the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from the sky,and the heavenly bodies will be shaken.
Mat 24:31 And he will send his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of the heavens to the other.
Rev 11:15 The seventh angel sounded his trumpet, and there were loud voices in heaven, which said: The kingdom of the world has become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Christ,and he will reign for ever and ever.”
That seventh angel sounded the 7th and last trumpet, the one spoken of in 1 Cor 15:50.
That seventh trumpet I believe has yet to sound..
All you pun artists - this is not about the las strumpet.. . :) | |
|
| Is there really a Second Coming? Posted: 1/11/2008 11:14:24 PM | Had posted another post on this it got delete I guess I had TMI so I'll just say this things have to take place before the second coming of Christ. What, where and with who are in the Bible. But you have to read the Whole Bible. Read Daniel, Ezekiel and Micah well as most of the last book's. And open your eyes you will see them happening and there is no stopping it. Jesus said I came not to change only to fulfill. | |
|
| Is there really a Second Coming? Posted: 1/12/2008 12:30:03 AM |
“And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.”
Who were the “elect”? These were the people who had followed the Messiah into the new Law of grace, the Christian disciples who had accepted Jesus. Where were these “elect”? Jesus says that the angels gathered them from “one end of heaven to the other.” These Christians were not on the receiving end of this “coming” of Christ, for they were already in the heavenly realm with him. Ephesians 2:5 tells us:
“And [Christ] hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus.”
In fact, these Christian souls were going to be a part of that coming, along with Christ! Colossians 3:4 tells us:
“When Christ, who is our life, shall appear, then shall ye also appear with him in glory.”
The Christians were (and are) already in the spiritual heavenly realm, for Christ had already come to those who were looking for him, and now Christ consolidated all of them in the glory of victory over the persecuting Jewish authorities.
In Matthew 24, verses 32-34, Jesus gives his disciples an answer to one of their original questions, “When shall these things be?”. He does not give them a specific day or time for this great “coming” against the enemies, but he has told them what signs to watch for and now he places a well–defined time limit on the prophecy:
“Now learn a parable of the fig tree; when his branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is nigh. So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors. Verily I say unto you, this generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.”
“All these things” includes all the signs Jesus outlined, all the tribulations he said they would have to endure, and it also includes the “coming in the clouds of heaven” at the end of the tribulations. All these things would happen before that literal generation had passed completely away, or, as Jesus put it in Matthew 16:28 –
“There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.”
It is plain that none of these events belong in our future. To try to force them into the far future is anachronistic – putting something out of place in time. These events belonged to that generation of Christians and Jews and the events of history match the events prophesied, point for point. There is no need to extrapolate the images of the prophecy into our future once we realize the nature of the symbols that are being used by Jesus. We see this use of symbolic language again in the next verse, verse 35:
“Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.”
Jesus is still prophesying, and these are still symbols. The “heaven” and “earth” that shall pass away are not this planet and universe that we inhabit. That is not the subject of Christ’s prophecy here. This refers, again, to the religious authorities of the old Law of Moses and the people who follow them, who would be destroyed by these war actions and would “pass away.” Christ’s words would never pass away, for they are the New Law that took the place of the Old Law which was “abolished in his flesh” by Christ’s sacrifice on the cross (Ephesians 2:15).
Verses 36 through 39:
“No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark; and they knew nothing about what would happen until the flood came and took them all away. That is how it will be at the coming of the Son of Man.” [NIV]
“That day” was the day of visitation, the coming of God against the enemy. No human being or even any spiritual creature other than Jehovah God knew the exact timing of the thing, but it was to be preceded by distinct and identifiable warning signs. To emphasize his point, Jesus compares this current situation with the one Noah was in where evil overran good and the tiny minority of good men and women were saved from the vast majority of evildoers by the divine intervention of God himself. Those evildoers were taken by surprise when the flood came. This time, the Jews would be taken by surprise when the flood of war came to their country and fortress and destroyed them. | |
|
| Is there really a Second Coming? Posted: 1/12/2008 9:17:57 AM | Does the literal intepretation mean that Christ was physical and then He turned spiritual when He ascended to the Father. And a literal reversal of this process would mean that Christ returns back again from the Spritual to descend into becoming a physical being again......?
Or is the literal interpretation that Christ enetered heaven as a Spirit, and if He comes back in the same way He enetred, He would literally have to come back in a Spiritual manner.
well Consigliere let me ask you this first? When Paul on the road to Damascus saw Christ and Christ stood by him later on--what do you think he saw?? The fact IS that He will be: a)visible and b) KNOWN to be Christ. Do you not find it strange that Paul, a man who has ALREADY seen Christ, speaks again repeatedly about His reappearing?? (as in Titus) For shame I say it would be for us to say He is done appearing or otherwise...for shame. Christ is ALREADY glorified correct? As such He STILL maintains a 'form' Consigliere. We simply cannot make Him vanish away into thin uhh..air, atmosphere, anamoly, ufo, WHATEVER!! GOD CHOOSES THIS WAY TO GLORIFY HIMSELF--HE HAS DONE IT IN THE PAST --HE WILL DO IT AGAIN!! Let's look at testimonial evidences : Paul, Dr. George Ritchie, Tom Papania, my brother....they claim to have seen Christ and the 'BRILLIANT' appearance of Him BUT it DOES NOT MEAN THAT HE HAS RETURNED TO FULFILL THE SCRIPTURES AS OF YET.
His appearance would be as 'incorporeal;' 1. not made of matter 2. pertaining to spiritual beings or things....but with the capacity to appear as He desires I would think..as those same that would 'sit' with Him and with The Father as well. This fact is evidenced by the fact that while here on earth He 'walked thru walls, walked right thru the midst of various crowds etc., etc., God will NOT be limited.
These christians that Paul was addressing were most likely waiting for the kingdom of Christ to be manifested and the Jewish religion/temple, to be destroyed, so that the persecutions they were living under would come to an end. It should be remembered that the enemies of the first church was the Jewish authorities. When you are waiting for the kingdom of Christ's grace to be put into authority because your fellow brethren are being tortured daily...then I think the 'hope' of the christian of that paticular time wouldn't be some rapture away in the sky, but would be for the Lord's justice and vengeance to be fulfilled upon thier enemies who were the Jewish authorities, in order they could serve the Lord without fear..
Luke 1 73the oath he swore to our father Abraham: 74to rescue us from the hand of our enemies, and to enable us to serve him without fear
Romans 11:28 As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies on your account; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs,
we will get into much more of this when we open up the eschatology and get more involved..until then..my courageous sword-slinging buddy..I bid you adieu..(there is nothing wrong with delving into the deep symbolism of the word of God..but we must be cautious to not do it to the extreme that we sacrifice the literal glory that God desires to present to the world at the end of the age....and then...rule in it Himself from Jerusalem...
“There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.”
It is plain that none of these events belong in our future. To try to force them into the far future is anachronistic – putting something out of place in time. These events belonged to that generation of Christians and Jews and the events of history match the events prophesied, point for point. There is no need to extrapolate the images of the prophecy into our future once we realize the nature of the symbols that are being used by Jesus.
ok Consigliere here goes--this was a preview of what was to come in the future IMO!! He showed this to strengthen them and to glorify and honor the Son IMO. It was a revelation of 'things to come.'
This particular prophecy clearly was pertaining to ONLY 'SOME" (Mat. 16:28) and was intended for those whom Christ chose ONLY. The verse just PRIOR to this states "For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works." Notice here that on the Mount experience, there are NO angels present as of yet aye--nor is there a reward given to ANYONE, a clear demonstration that this is not the exact fulfillment of his previous words, but a foretaste only.
Furthermore, as we follow this a bit further in chapter 24 of Matthew's Gospel, we find Jesus' words- "And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory." You see here that it is not the same appearance of Christ whatsoever as in this appearance, ALL the tribes of the earth SEE the Son of man COMING. Hence, the two prophecies simply are NOT and Cannot be the same. They are TWO different prophecies concerning two different groups obviously.
Furthermore, in Matthew 23, verses 38-39, Jesus gives yet ANOTHER prophecy and this has NOT taken place as of yet either. And oh, incidentally...came across a most interesting verse..in or about this same area: Christ makes the accusation and asserts the destiny of certain of those that would oppose His mission. In Matthew 23:33, He states: "Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?" Here Christ is speaking of a literal "damnation" AND a literal "hell" as awaiting them. It is as a CERTAINTY that He speaks of it. It is therefore of a certainty that they will go there or be found there. He has practically 'sentenced' them and He CAN as He has the foreknowledge to do so.
Damnation:
???´s?? krisis kree'-sis (Subjectively or objectively, for or against); by extension a tribunal; by implication justice (specifically divine law): - accusation, condemnation, damnation, judgment.
Hell:
?e´e??a geenna gheh'-en-nah Of Hebrew origin ([H1516] and [H2011]); valley of (the son of) Hinnom; gehenna (or Ge-Hinnom), a valley of Jerusalem, used (figuratively) as a name for the place (or state) of everlasting punishment: - hell.
The 'Fig Tree' parable also stands as a 'SIGN' (a major one at that) of the Lord's return. The 'budding' of the Jewish nation has only occurred in the LAST century and is a clear indication that Christ is near to return AND much worse events, of course will ensue. Christ spoke of 'nuclear proliferation' at a time when not so much as the concept of the gasoline engine was even evolved.
 | |
|
| Is there really a Second Coming? Posted: 1/12/2008 12:19:13 PM |
The 'Fig Tree' parable also stands as a 'SIGN' (a major one at that) of the Lord's return. The 'budding' of the Jewish nation has only occurred in the LAST century and is a clear indication that Christ is near to return AND much worse events, of course will ensue. Christ spoke of 'nuclear proliferation' at a time when not so much as the concept of the gasoline engine was even evolved.
How this 'fig tree' turned into such a major worldly sign concerning Israel and of Christ's coming is beyond me.
Christ used the 'fig tree' merely to parallel that when the fig tree shows certain signs in its growth that harvest is soon ready. The signs demonstrated in the fig tree, reveal that the time of harvest is near. Christ could have used an apple tree or an orange tree, or a grain of wheat if He so desired... The fig tree has no significant relevance in itself other than it is a seasonal tree that bears fruit, and Christ used the example only to show that the signs displayed would mean that the time frame is immediate.
By the way, I have already done that study link I emailed you, why are you making me do it again for you...all these issues are addressed in a much better way than I can address them... | |
|
| Is there really a Second Coming? Posted: 1/12/2008 1:26:55 PM | Jesus is still prophesying, and these are still symbols. The “heaven” and “earth” that shall pass away are not this planet and universe that we inhabit. The problem with using the heaven and earth as symbols is it does not square with what scripture says :-
(Isa 65:17 KJV) For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind. The former is still well remembered by all alive today : - due to it being the same old earth and heavens. Constantly on my mind as to the evil that exists on said earth.
(Isa 66:21 KJV) And I will also take of them for priests and for Levites, saith the LORD. For as the new heavens and the new eart, which I will make, shall remain before me, saith the LORD, so shall your seed and your name remain.
(Isa 65:17 KJV) For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind. But be ye glad and rejoice for ever in that which I create: for, behold, I create Jerusalem a rejoicing, and her people a joy. And I will rejoice in Jerusalem, and joy in my people: and the voice of weeping shall be no more heard in her, nor the voice of crying.
(2 Pet 3:12 KJV) Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat? Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.
(Rev 21:1 KJV) And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.
(Rev 21:4 KJV) And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.
Has death, pain, sorrow or crying passed away?? NO - then we are not on the new earth neither is there yet a new heaven.
Is pain an allegory? Is death and sorrow allegory?
"By the way, I have already done that study link I emailed you, why are you making me do it again for you...all these issues are addressed in a much better way than I can address them..." Not sure if this was directed at me, if it was I did check the site but I don't have the time to go into it in depth - I'm really tied up with things till mid March. | |
|
| Is there really a Second Coming? Posted: 1/12/2008 1:40:19 PM |
By the way, I have already done that study link I emailed you, why are you making me do it again for you...all these issues are addressed in a much better way than I can address them...
right O ..will have a closer look soon...but meanwhile...would you agree that Matthew 16:27; 24:30; Rev. 1:7; are not the same prophecy as found in Matthew 16:28?
I'm really tied up with things till mid March.
well I hope that doesn't tie you up for the 'prophecy convention' to be held here on POF soon. | |
|
| Is there really a Second Coming? Posted: 1/12/2008 2:08:17 PM | Fitman my comments were directed to Consig. He had posted a link to the topic of heaven and hell and the lake of fire at. http://www.tentmaker.org/books/
I'll be there for the convention - haha
http://www.tentmaker.org/books/heavenandearth.htm
There was a specific site within tentmakerorg but I cant find it - thought I'd bookmarked that - have a look at the links above. | |
|
| Is there really a Second Coming? Posted: 1/12/2008 2:19:56 PM |
Has death, pain, sorrow or crying passed away?? NO - then we are not on the new earth neither is there yet a new heaven.
I beg to differ and so do the scriptures.
2 Timothy 1:10 but it has now been revealed through the appearing of our Savior, Christ Jesus, who has destroyed death and has brought life and immortality to light through the gospel.
well looky there, it states that Christ has appeared and destroyed death and has brought life and immortality through the gospel.
1Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and there was no longer any sea. 2I saw the Holy City, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride beautifully dressed for her husband. 3And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, "Now the dwelling of God is with men, and he will live with them. They will be his people, and God himself will be with them and be their God. 4He will wipe every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain, for the old order of things has passed away." 5He who was seated on the throne said, "I am making everything new!" Then he said, "Write this down, for these words are trustworthy and true."
6He said to me: "It is done. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End. To him who is thirsty I will give to drink without cost from the spring of the water of life. 7He who overcomes will inherit all this, and I will be his God and he will be my son.
Lots of points in this passage
1)new heaven and new earth 2) manifestation of Holy City 3)NOW the dwelling of God is with men 4)no more death,sorrow, tears 5) offer extended of free spiritual life. 6) called sons of God
Aside from your interpretation of heaven and earth being the literal kosmos...have any of these other points been fulfilled?
2)manifestation of Holy City..according to the author of Hebrews this city was a present reality when he wrote the letter.
Hebrews 12:22 But you have come to Mount Zion, to the heavenly Jerusalem, the city of the living God. You have come to thousands upon thousands of angels in joyful assembly,
3)NOW the dwelling of God is with men....Is God dwelling with men?
1 John 4 4You, dear children, are from God and have overcome them, because the one who is in you is greater than the one who is in the world.
13We know that we live in him and he in us, because he has given us of his Spirit.
4)no more death,sorrow, tears....already shared that death has been destroyed, but I consider this pasage in Revelation to reflect the present situation of persecutions that the church was facing, and that they would be delivered out of thier persecutions and sorrows, when thier enemies(Jews) were defeated by the Romans.
5) offer extended of free spiritual life.....Is this offer available today?
6) called sons of God....Are we called sons of God.
In order for all these events to be in fulfillment the heaven and earth must first pass away and be established anew. If the New heaven and earth have not been manifested, then neither are any of these other points yet valid. | |
|
| Is there really a Second Coming? Posted: 1/12/2008 2:23:06 PM | to understand the second coming you've got to look at the nature of Time in Eternity Christ is the Singularity, that comes first follows after, the way to the father (in heaven all things are happening at once simultaneously)
the past & future extend from now, that's the nature of Eternal Life | |
|
| Is there really a Second Coming? Posted: 1/12/2008 3:13:07 PM | no more death,sorrow, tears....already shared that death has been destroyed, but I consider this passage in Revelation to reflect the present situation of persecutions that the church was facing, and that they would be delivered out of their persecutions and sorrows, when their enemies(Jews) were defeated by the Romans.
Well you can dance around all you want with scripture - there are in my opinion things that are fulfilled some not - the debate is around what has been accomplished and not - you seem to be able to do a double take on things - thats fine. I'm not yet solidifed in my stance as you seem to be. I really don't have a position to defend really - I have pointed out what I think lacks in some of your argumentation. The only thing I believe we have in common is that the spiritual kingdom was taken from Israel and given to the Gentiles and that was not written with an allegory -
(Mat 21:43 KJV) Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.
The rest is very much open to interpretation - I have given some examples in this thread where prophecy and dates of events in this current non allegorical earth substantiate those interpretions - the same cannot be said of your statements - you can play with allegory till the next heaven and earth arrives - allegory can be used to explain whatever you want it to mean - historical events cannot.
How can it be said that :-
(Rev 11:15 KJV) And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever.
When this planet is filled with unrighteousness - the kingdoms of this world are still very much in the hands of the deceiver - to claim otherwise is make the whole thing a mockery and takes a mind unwilling to accept that all thing have not yet been fulfilled. Haggle all you want about "ever" being an "age" - the facts are plain to see all around us - explain that the kingdom is here and there is no pain, sorrow or tears to some starving people in Africa and blood being shed in the world.
(1 Cor 15:19 KJV) If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men most miserable.
(1 Cor 15:23 KJV) But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at his coming. Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power
Currently we do not see "all rule and all authority and power." under God. To state otherwise is to deny the obvious.
I've no doubt you have an allegorical/symbolic interpretation of all rule and all authority and power also. | |
|
| Is there really a Second Coming? Posted: 1/12/2008 3:31:10 PM |
you seem to be able to do a double take on things - thats fine
Actually nevercanezzar it is you who are doing the double take.
How can it be said that :-
(Rev 11:15 KJV) And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever.
When this planet is filled with unrighteousness - the kingdoms of this world are still very much in the hands of the deceiver - to claim otherwise is make the whole thing a mockery and takes a mind unwilling to accept that all thing have not yet been fulfilled.
If you didn't do the double take you wouldn't swith back to 'kingdoms of the world' as pertaining to the physical realm, but would keep in stride with the 'kingdoms of this world' as being the spiritual authority instead of the physical.
Christ is presently sitting on the throne and reigns in the spiritual realms...He is said to be at the right hand of God.
Are you denying that Christ is presently sitting on the Throne of God's authority, and instead saying that satan is presently the ruling authority? | |
|
| Is there really a Second Coming? Posted: 1/12/2008 3:34:31 PM | what are the odds?
is there any betting / bookmaker agency offering you odds for let's say second coming before 2010, 2020 and so on?
could be nice to see the odds, than based on your beliefs make your bets -so you could actually make money on the second coming (or the lack of it)  | |
|
|
| Page 2 of 6
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
|