| Panties -little shorts, or thongs, visable or not?
Posted: 5/6/2008 5:02:41 PM | I stick to my earlier comment. Going commando is the best. Then you dont have to worry about them showing or leaving visable panty lines. and last but least its easy axcess  | |
|
| Panties -little shorts, or thongs, visable or not?
Posted: 5/6/2008 5:11:25 PM | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
never mind the " easy access" bit because the vast majority of guys are not going to get any form of access .
the whole fun , sexy , erotic bit is in the view of a womans knickers , the glimpse up her skirt, the stocking tops etc etc etc.
thats the challenge to be able to see her panties, whilst she is struggling to prevent the whole world from seeing her knickers there will be many more guys breaking their necks for a sighting.
boobs and bras do nothing for me, the sight of cleavage and a bit of bra or a bra thru her blouse does nothing for me at all, her matching knickers are a different story tho.
women in general do very little to prevent any one from seeing their bras either thru an undone blouse or seen thru her blouse..........whilst the vast majority of women wearing skirts and dressess continue to struggle to prevent anyone from seeing their knickers there will be many many more men doing their upmost to see her knickers. | |
|
| Panties -little shorts, or thongs, visable or not?
Posted: 5/6/2008 5:25:33 PM | Well I like woman a bit on the trashy side. So going commando is kinda a given and its kinda sexy to see some chick in a short skirt and catch a brief glimpse of her snatch when she opens her legs | |
|
| Panties -little shorts, or thongs, visable or not?
Posted: 5/6/2008 5:36:11 PM | A great set of legs and the shortest shorts that are legal
have my undivided attention. A former GF of mine
never wore panties because she feared the lines
showing through her jeans. I don't quite understand
the thinking behind that. It's not like she wore boxers!
The thong is quite nice to see in public here and there but
too many women that wear the low rise jeans that go with
them, are always hoisting up their drawers, or end up with
baggy bottoms and crotches which gives them the Gangsta
look which I'm sure wasn't their intention. | |
|
| Panties -little shorts, or thongs, visable or not?
Posted: 5/6/2008 5:41:05 PM |
A former GF of mine never wore panties because she feared the lines showing through her jeans. I don't quite understand the thinking behind that.
i agree with her. when i see panty lines on jeans it says to me the wearer is trying to wear jeans that are too tight for her. kinda of trailer trashy, if you ask me. | |
|
| |
| |
| Panties -little shorts, or thongs, visable or not?
Posted: 5/7/2008 2:38:26 PM |
Upon closer investigation, BS's debut album came out in 1999, her first single at the end of 1998. This was 1-2 years after Demonica Lewinsky was showing The Prez her thong.
So Britney is off the hook. Wikipedia is vague on the chronological history, saying only "in the 1990's, the thong began to gain widespread acceptance and popularity in the US". So it's been well more than a decade, which is pretty long for a fashion trend. "Girls Gone Wild" goes back to at least 1992, the year of the first lawsuit it was involved in. So the whole 'stripper chic' thing in general is soooo 1990's. With any luck it has run its course.
Always seemed to me that Sisqo should take a large part of the credit for the rise in popularity of the thong. That seemed to be around the time people like Britney and Lita started doing the whole visible thong thing.
At any rate, I don't think thongs as a whole are a trend. Only the way they were visible. As garments, I think it's a safe bet that they're here to stay. Full backs are now the VCRs of lingerie; still existent but completely obsolete. | |
|
| Panties -little shorts, or thongs, visable or not?
Posted: 5/7/2008 4:23:50 PM | HAhaha.
It really is a sight for sore eyes and a major turn off when you see a girl with those low waist jeans, a big fat arse sticking out & a tiny thong struggling to keep it all in. Why do they even wear them, yet alone show them off in public.
I was at Chester Zoo this weekend & I saw it again - in a public place. It was a disgrace. It put me off my food.
 | |
|
| |
| Panties -little shorts, or thongs, visable or not?
Posted: 5/8/2008 9:55:24 PM | Boy shorts! No thongs! Definitely no thongs showing!
....I'll take a business skirt suit, sun dress, dress, or classy soft casual skirt over any; tight jeans, lycra, mini skirt, low cut top, mini-tees or any other skank-wear. | |
|
| Panties -little shorts, or thongs, visable or not?
Posted: 5/8/2008 11:41:08 PM | | I love women in little shorts undies... love them in French knickers and camisoles... love them in panties... hate G strings! they look so tacky, especially when a woman bends over or squats down. | |
|
| Panties -little shorts, or thongs, visable or not?
Posted: 5/9/2008 7:53:13 AM | lol, if they are "tacky" when she bends over, maybe she should shower a LITTLE more often.....
I wonder though: how do you know they're "tacky"? You reaching down to give em a tug? lol
(sorry, I couldn't help myself, really, I couldn't hehehehe) | |
|
| |
| Panties -little shorts, or thongs, visable or not?
Posted: 7/22/2008 11:55:38 AM | | A lot depends on what type of mood I am in as to what panties I prefer. I have almost 200 pair. About half are thongs and G's and the rest are bikini and boyshort. Because I am a guy I am very careful about the waistband showing but I do find it exciting to glimpse a little peek. Not having 4 inches sticking out but just enough to see the panty. | |
|
| |
| |
| Panties -little shorts, or thongs, visable or not?
Posted: 7/23/2008 2:42:45 PM | | Variety is the spice of life. So have it all. Even go as one said here, comando. My gf loves thongs, and so do I, but then she loves to surprise me with little things she buys just for me, just so I enjoy taking them off of her. | |
|
| Panties -little shorts, or thongs, visable or not?
Posted: 7/23/2008 2:49:24 PM | Hey im not a guy but i hardly wear thongs anymore. im all about those booty shorts!!!
it helps that ive got the booty for them  i still think thongs are hot for sure but id say it all depends on your body type. and i think the panty line showing a little is sexy depending on what your wearing.the thong showing with the low cut jeans is hot in a trashy way. | |
|
| Panties -little shorts, or thongs, visable or not?
Posted: 7/23/2008 6:06:46 PM | Since you ask... There is nothing sexier than a womans panties, not thongs and not shorts. They can be almost any style, white, black, lace or healthy cotton. There is little in this life more exciting than removing a womans panties. I hope I an not offending anyone.
Paul | |
|
| Panties -little shorts, or thongs, visable or not?
Posted: 7/23/2008 6:18:26 PM | i think thongs are a little passe right now unless you've got a killer ass. i'm all about the booty shorts & the guys who love em!
anyway i just wanted to say.. it's really interesting that some guys like full panty lines sticking above jeans. i thought only thongs looked good that way.. i always thought having boyshorts stick over the top was really unsexy and it sucks when you're dancing and your shirt rides up lol. glad to hear that's not always the case and some guys actually like it! | |
|
| Panties -little shorts, or thongs, visable or not?
Posted: 7/23/2008 11:28:23 PM | If it is a complete stranger that I will never see again, only passing by on the street I love the peek of a thong or VPL.
If it is someone I know or am dating or related to I would rather not see it. With the exception of relations I would much rather it be a secret and surprise for later.
I am not sure if the OP meant boy short underwear or just regular tiny shorts. I was at the theater tonight and noticed more than a dozen women (ages ranging between 14 and 30) that were wearing mini micro shorts, jean shorts to cotton/sweat shorts. The funny thing was they spent a lot of time trying to pull the legs out of their crotch, or down more. It kind of looked like they were scratching for crabs or lice. I found it highly amusing rather than sexy. | |
|
| |
| Panties -little shorts, or thongs, visable or not?
Posted: 7/24/2008 1:10:25 AM | I prefer a woman in panties or short-short type knickers.
I have never been turned-on by a g-string.
I love a woman in silk French knickers and camisole also.
And then there's... commando!! lol | |
|
| Panties -little shorts, or thongs, visable or not?
Posted: 7/24/2008 1:33:26 AM | I usually find visible highly shorts, thongs, panties, boxers or briefs on women a bit disgusting downtown. You don't want to dress like that if you work in an office or in retail. And they look terrible with even a little bit of a muffin midsection.
(I prefer bras to be as seamless and invisible as possible. To me, most women look best when their surface is a mixture of gentle convex and concave curves, with minimum rumples and seams.)
However, on a girl with a nice lean mid-section, or a lean muscular build, pretty much anything she wears will look great.
On a date, playing a sport, camping, hanging around the house, style is more relaxed. But the more prominent the display of underwear, the better the body has to be for it to be attractive. | |
|
Home
login 
