|
|
|
|
|
| Mr.Wright Posted: 3/17/2008 3:13:45 PM | Steven02151 said:
Mr. McCain's pastor would have us make war on 2 billion muslims.........to "destroy Islam" ... and how would that happen? Nuclear bombs on three continents? I think prescribing nuclear war is a far more serious enterprise than someone going off on America..........and telling us that it needs to search its soul, which I agree with.
Again, false information. Show me the reputable source that documents whomever you're talking about as Mr. McCain's pastor. I want to see where it says that this individual you are referencing is McCain's pastor and that McCain regularly attends his church. I'll be waiting. | |
|
| Mr.Wright Posted: 3/17/2008 5:19:19 PM |
And amazingly, while some are actually defending Wright's words
Girl, I know you can read....I said I did not defend his message, but pointed out the part of the speech you purposely put out of context. Not that it matters I guess, as long as it helps your arguement...in your own mind.... | |
|
| Mr.Wright Posted: 3/17/2008 5:38:18 PM | Someone explain how after someone (or multiple someones) posts part of an article and asks a question about it's logic it makes sense to just post the entire article? Southernlass, for some reason I get the impression you are just ignoring half what is posted since it doesn't agree with what you think. If you aren't going to at least pretend to listen and form a reasonable argument to some of these posts, then why do you even bother to post things in the first place?
I'm not trying to be offensive, and maybe it's just how I'm looking at things, but it seems like you are just taking things as you want to see them and don't want to consider anything that may not be directly in line with your own views. I start to wonder if you're maybe afraid that if we manage to get a black president in office, he'll take revenge on the south for the Civil War. (oh wait, it's the War Between the States, or War of Northern Aggression, I forget which). Well, that would be if anyone had actually declared war at least.
Honestly, one of my biggest fears is that if Hillary or Obama doesn't win, people will start to say that voters are sexist or voters are racist. We don't think that a women/black man can be president - at least Opera isn't running, then we would hear both at the same time. The President may be a powerful person, but he can't exactly do a whole lot of Congress won't let him. People complain about the war in Iraq - well, if Congress hadn't given Bush the money and the troops, then we wouldn't be there right now.
It shouldn't matter who is President, who's in Congress, who's on the Supreme Court. What is right and wrong is mostly universal between cultures/religions/races/etc... The elected officials are there to do what is right for the people. Maybe if we could trust all of them to do that we would have a more productive system rather than arguing over if a person's heritage (supposed or real) matters in an election. | |
|
| Mr.Wright Posted: 3/17/2008 5:50:58 PM | As usual, you're truly entertaining, Southernlass. It's funny how you think so many are brain washed. Even those who aren't voting for Barack still think he is a good guy.
And, you're still deflecting. When ya gonna answer? | |
|
| Mr.Wright Posted: 3/17/2008 5:51:07 PM | Tridigee said:
Someone explain how after someone (or multiple someones) posts part of an article and asks a question about it's logic it makes sense to just post the entire article?
It's not the same article as the first one I posted. I posted the second article which refutes the one Outdoor posted. As for the question about its logic, well that is a subjective matter, now isn't it? In my opinion, it's very logical to ask the reader to think in depth about what Muslims might feel in regard to someone who they consider to also be Muslim by birthright, leading the nation. If they consider Obama to be Muslim and he has turned from his Muslim roots to become a Christian, the article states that he could be in danger, as could the country under his leadership. Of course, in order to see this as logical, one has to be able to think logically.
I am listening to (reading) these various arguments and I am reading every single post. It's just that there are some posts that simply do not need a response, in my opinion. Some are simply responses to my response and since both are opinions, arguing over them is mostly futile. I'm definitely not going to attempt to change hard core, entrenched, locked in opinion. That's not my purpose in posting. My purpose in posting is to express my own opinion, exchange opinions with others politely and courteously, and point out things that other people may not have considered. What they do with what I've pointed out is their own business and visa versa.
And another thing, this thread is about Rev. Wright. It's not about Obama's Muslim roots, or to be completely fair to the other side that says these Muslim roots don't exist, Obama's lack of Muslim roots. lol.
VioletSkye said:
And, you're still deflecting. When ya gonna answer?
There is little left to say to you, Violet. Seriously. And I know when not to waste my time. I think we're both clear on one another's perspectives. Further discussion upon this particular topic with you is futile. | |
|
| Mr.Wright Posted: 3/17/2008 6:03:01 PM | southernlass, here you go:
http://www.motherjones.com/washington_dispatch/2008/03/john-mccain-rod-parsley-spiritual-guide.html
I dont give a damn what either pastor says, but if its important to you.... | |
|
| Mr.Wright Posted: 3/17/2008 6:10:44 PM |
There is little left to say to you, Violet. Seriously. And I know when not to waste my time. I think we're both clear on one another's perspectives. Further discussion upon this particular topic with you is futile.
Yeah, I didn't think so. You can't do it. And you won't. Because it's not possible.
Brick wall anyone? | |
|
| Mr.Wright Posted: 3/17/2008 6:14:19 PM | Steven,
Ron Parsely is not McCain's personal pastor. Ron Parsely is not McCain's spiritual advisor. McCain stated that Ron Parsely is "a spiritual advisor." He did not say to whom. This particular pastor has endorsed John McCain. That is all he has done. That is such a completely different animal than McCain regularly attending his church, or seeing him as a family member and personal spiritual advisor. McCain has not done any of the above. McCain has merely accepted an endorsement from this person. | |
|
| Mr.Wright Posted: 3/17/2008 6:26:30 PM |
Senator John McCain hailed as a spiritual adviser an Ohio megachurch pastor who has called upon Christians to wage a "war" against the "false religion" of Islam with the aim of destroying it.
Why would McCain court Parsley? He has long had trouble figuring out how to deal with Christian fundamentalists, an important bloc for the Republican Party. During his 2000 presidential bid, he referred to Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell as "agents of intolerance." But six years later, as he readied himself for another White House run, McCain repudiated that remark. More recently, his campaign hit a rough patch when he accepted the endorsement of the Reverend John Hagee, a Texas televangelist who has called the Catholic Church "the great whore" and a "false cult system." After the Catholic League protested and called on McCain to renounce Hagee's support, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee praised Hagee's spiritual leadership and support of Israel and said that "when [Hagee] endorses me, it does not mean that I embrace everything that he stands for or believes in." After being further criticized for his Hagee connection, McCain backed off slightly, saying, "I repudiate any comments that are made, including Pastor Hagee's, if they are anti-Catholic or offensive to Catholics." But McCain did not renounce Hagee's endorsement.
McCain's relationship with Parsley is politically significant. In 2004, Parsley's church was credited with driving Christian fundamentalist voters to the polls for George W. Bush. With Ohio expected to again be a decisive state in the presidential contest, Parsley's World Harvest Church and an affiliated entity called Reformation Ohio, which registers voters, could be important players within this battleground state. Considering that the Ohio Republican Party has been decimated by various political scandals and that a popular Democrat, Ted Strickland, is now the state's governor, McCain and the Republicans will need all the help they can get in the Buckeye State this fall. It's a real question: Can McCain win the presidency without Parsley?
The McCain campaign did not respond to a request for comment regarding Parsley and his anti-Islam writings. Parsley did not return a call seeking comment.
"The last thing I want to be is another screaming voice moving people to extremes and provoking them to folly in the name of patriotism," Parsley writes in Silent No More. Provoking people to holy war is another matter. About that, McCain so far is silent.
Ok he may have not been sitting in the pews with this guy, but he did 'hail him as a spiritual leader'. How's that so different? | |
|
| Mr.Wright Posted: 3/17/2008 6:39:54 PM | Sim...
I think it was the letter 'a' that cinched for her...
Ron Parsely is not McCain's personal pastor. Ron Parsely is not McCain's spiritual advisor. McCain stated that Ron Parsely is "a spiritual advisor." | |
|
| Mr.Wright Posted: 3/17/2008 9:47:29 PM |
McCain has merely accepted an endorsement from this person. ....with open arms....
....excerpting from Parsley’s 2005 book, Silent No More:
In fact, I will tell you this: I do not believe our country can truly fulfill its divine purpose until we understand our historical conflict with Islam. I know that this statement sounds extreme, but I do not shrink from its implications. The fact is that America was founded, in part, with the intention of seeing this false religion destroyed, and I believe September 11, 2001, was a generational call to arms that we can no longer ignore.
Parsley has also called Allah a “demon spirit” and said that explorer Christopher Columbus’s dream was to “defeat Islam.”
Along with several other quotes, yup...he wants to kill em all..... Merely...... This is where your "objectivity" has clearly gone arye!
You question Obamas childhood documents....which he clearly had no control over...yet whe it comes to McCains (an adult) open-armed endorsement of a call to arms against a billion or so peoples....you call it merely....and a endorsement....
Further....Obama has....in no uncertain terms....denounced Wright....
Further....your pathatic attempt to re-post the parts about murtadd....when the page you quote states it will have little or no effect on the presidency.
McCain accepted the endorsment purely for political reasons.....and you're ok with that......
 | |
|
| Mr.Wright Posted: 3/17/2008 9:59:17 PM | McCain is like any other professional politician, including Obama; he is not above accepting dubious political endorsements. None of them are. Don't delude yourself to the contrary.
Now back on topic, Obama cannot denounce Wright. How can he? It's bull..well, you know what it is.
Obama sat in the minister's pulpit for twenty years. This minister married him and Michelle, baptized their kids, and advised him as a close personal friend on spiritual matters and who knows what else. This man is considered an "uncle" to Obama and his family, a family member. How does one backtrack and distance oneself from that after being on the receiving and accepting end of it for twenty years? How does one denounce this man now, just because one is running for president and wants the vote? He denounces Wright now because he finally gets that it's unpopular, unwise, bad for his pristeen image, and ends his bid for the presidency if he doesn't? What the hell kind of judgment is that, Outdoor2?
I'll tell you what kind of judgment it is, it's the kind we don't need running this country! | |
|
| Mr.Wright Posted: 3/18/2008 3:33:13 AM |
McCain is like any other professional politician, including Obama; he is not above accepting dubious political endorsements. None of them are. Don't delude yourself to the contrary.
Obama denounced and rejected Farrakhan's endorsement several weeks ago....wonder if that was seen by anyone but me? | |
|
| Mr.Wright Posted: 3/18/2008 7:34:50 AM | Funny how times change, isn't it ?
Bush praises baptists despite leading pastor's anti-muslim rant
Church & State, Jul/Aug 2002
President George W. Bush addressed a national meeting of the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) June 11, one day after a denominational leader bitterly attacked Islam and told pastors attending the convention that many of America's problems can be blamed on religious pluralism.
The Rev. Jerry Vines, a former SBC president, blasted pluralism at a pastors' meeting June 10, telling attendees that people who believe in religious diversity "would have us believe that Islam is just as good as Christianity, but I'm here to tell you, ladies and gentlemen, that Islam is not just as good as Christianity."
Vines, currently pastor of the First Baptist Church of Jacksonville, Fla., went on to say, "Christianity was founded by the virgin-born Jesus Christ. Islam was founded by Mohammed, a demonpossessed pedophile who had 12 wives and his last one was a 9-year-old girl. And I will tell you, Allah is not Jehovah either. Jehovah's not going to turn you into a terrorist that'll try to bomb people and take the lives of thousands and thousands of people."
The Rev. Jack Graham, the newly elected SBC president, endorsed Vines' comments, calling them "accurate." Muslim groups were outraged.
"It's really unfortunate that a top leader in a mainstream Christian church... would use such hate-filled and bigoted language in describing the faith of one-fifth of the world's population," said Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the Council on AmericanIslamic Relations in Washington. "This is the level of bigotry that requires a clear statement from the top leadership of the Southern Baptist Convention."
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3944/is_200207/ai_n9101237
Hmm , even Bush's pastor is backing Obama...and Bush went along with it....
Bush Spiritual Confidante Backs Obama
January 23, 2008 12:16 PM
ABC News' Jennifer Parker Reports: A longtime spiritual confidante of President George W. Bush is backing Sen. Barack Obama in the '08 race.
Rev. Kirbyjon Caldwell, senior pastor of Winsor Village United Methodist Church in Texas, plans to campaign for Obama, and says the Illinois senator may even pay a visit to his 15,000 -member church.
Caldwell, a highly influential black pastor in Texas, advocates taking "sanctuary" to the streets.The endorsement comes as Obama is engaged in a pitched primary battle in South Carolina, where black voters make up about half of the state's registered Democrats.
He told the Houston Chronicle's Ruth Rendon that he's endorsing Obama because of the senator's "character, confidence and courage."
The pastor said he called President Bush to tell him about his decision and Bush was "okay" with it, reports the Houston Chronicle.
In an interview posted to the spiritual website Beliefnet.com, Caldwell said he has prayed with Bush over the phone several times, and believes the president is comfortable with him because both are "known as straight-shooting CEO-types who don't get tangles up in a lot of introspection."
Caldwell introduced Bush at the 2000 Republican nomination and gave the benediction at both of Bush's inaugurations.
He said Obama "would do a wonderful job to bring people together to pursue a common vision we all have," reports the Chronicle.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/01/bush-spiritual.html
Seems Bush wants to keep some visits officially Top Secret...
Black Pastors White House Visits On Blast Posted December 18, 2007
By Pamela Gentry, Senior Polticial Producer
Posted Dec. 18, 2007 – Black ministers who have quietly met with the Bush administration at the White House regarding faith-based incentive dollars may now find politics from the pulpit risky business. Their names and visits will now become part of the public record.
A federal judge’s ruling Monday was a blow to the Bush administration, which had hoped to keep records private showing visits by prominent conservative religious leaders.
The judge rejected the White House’s argument and ordered the information be turned over to Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, the liberal watchdog group that made the request.
Early in the Bush administration, senior adviser to the president, Karl Rove, arranged several meetings with Bush and religious leaders to develop a “buy-in strategy” for Bush’s new faith-based incentives.
Some folks agreed to meet because the meetings were behind closed doors and their attendance and the topics discussed were not available for public consumption.
Several well-known African-American pastors were included in one of the first such meetings in March 2001. After the meeting, Bush told reporters, the ministers are “very crucial for helping change” their communities.
“Many of those preachers are bishops over churches that have got great programs and change people’s hearts and provide hope in neighborhoods where there is no hope,” Bush said at the time. “So I view them not as agents of politics; I view them as agents of change.”
Claude Allen, Bush’s former domestic policy adviser, along with Rove, arranged meetings with Black ministers, including the Rev. T. D. Jakes, of Dallas; the Rev. Kirby John Caldwell of Houston; and Bishop Eddie Long, of Atlanta.
Some Black pastors were more public about their support: Caldwell delivered the prayer at Bush’s inaugural in 2005. But others were more low key and had hoped to keep their attendance at these pow-wows, hush-hush.
That’s why Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington wanted to know who was meeting with the administration. They went to court to get the Secret Service to turn over visitor logs about nine conservative religious commentators, including James Dobson, Gary Bauer and Jerry Falwell, with whom the president met.
Anne L. Weismann, the watchdog group’s chief counsel, told The Associate Press. “The judge saw their arguments for what they were.”
It will be interesting to see exactly which Black religious leaders met with the Bush administration over the last six years.
http://blogs.bet.com/news/pamela/category/president-bush/
President and Mrs. Bush Saddened by Death of Jerry Falwell
RSS Feed White House News
Laura and I are deeply saddened by the death of Jerry Falwell, a man who cherished faith, family, and freedom. As the founder of Thomas Road Baptist Church in Lynchburg, Virginia, Jerry lived a life of faith and called upon men and women of all backgrounds to believe in God and serve their communities. One of his lasting contributions was the establishment of Liberty University, where he taught young people to remain true to their convictions and rely upon God's word throughout each stage of their lives.
Today, our thoughts and prayers are with his wife Macel and the rest of the Falwell family.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070515-8.html
Falwell was pretty well known for his over the top hatred of certain groups, he not only visited the President at the White House - they officially mourned his passing.
Another visitor, Dr James Dobson, is a rather interesting person too.....
Dobson, a psychologist by training with a Ph.D from the University of Southern California, nurtured the FOF ministry while largely staying out of the political limelight. Instead, he published reams of books, pamphlets, newsletters on parenting advice, albeit with evangelical underpinnings, and increasingly bashed gays as dangerous to children and Americans’ well-being in general.
His first book, Dare to Discipline, sold more than 3 million copies, according to FOF’s website, and was a call for parents to be sterner in the rearing of children. His latest book, Marriage Under Fire, warns of a nation “Hurtling Toward Gomorrah.” According to Dobson, gays, “radical feminists,” “liberal lawmakers” and Hollywood filmmakers have gone unchallenged in their zeal to bury values Americans celebrated in the 1950s with calls for civil rights for gays, gender equality and too much sex and violence in music and movies.
http://www.au.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=7195&news_iv_ctrl=0&abbr=cs_
| |
|
| Mr.Wright Posted: 3/18/2008 7:37:53 AM | Obama denounced and rejected Farrakhan's endorsement several weeks ago After it got the attention of the public,much like what is going on with Dr Wright..Obama has been a member of a basically separatist church for 20 years which has been lead by a controversial pastor during that time. He did not disagree with any of the preachings or the endorsement of Farrakhan until it negatively impacted his campaign. As each day passes he becomes more and more like the politicians that he has been trying to distance himself from.... up until recently the press has given him a free pass now, that he has been questioned about his nefarious affiliations he alleges to denounce these views and people, doesn't say much for his "Character"!
Montreal guy I see this on every thread would you please quit copying and pasting such long articles it is obvious that you try to derail threads that you dont agree with by overwhelming them with superfluous articles..express your opinions,quit posting such long pieces just post the links ..Please... | |
|
| Mr.Wright Posted: 3/18/2008 8:33:47 AM | It's called a citation, and most people probably won't read the links.
 | |
|
| Mr.Wright Posted: 3/18/2008 8:37:29 AM | and those wagging their finger because Mr.Obama is closely associated with him.
Wagging fingers? Why must those who are curiously sceptical or unsupporting of this Church's choice of leader or Obama's choice of Church be "wagging their finger"??
The Pastor of the Church that Sen. Obama is a member of, made horrible statements about our country, our current leader, our politics, and all but one of the other candidates running against Obama during a "sermon" at Church service. That is a fact.
Senator Obama has known this man for over 20 years. More than enough time to know the man well.
Now, as a Christian, who is also an active member of a Church, as well a member of its staff, I can share details regarding how the majority of "Church-goin" folk make a decision to join a Church. First, one will obviously consider association. If you know you are not Catholic, nor agree with their doctrine or creed, you will not attempt to become a member at a Catholic Church, neither visit said Church. Youre not Baptist? Same drill. Now, say you have no "association" and enjoy non-denominational Churches. Rock on. You visit a variety of said Churches and after reading their "Church Creed or Beliefs or something similar to that, if you find said document, which is approved by the Pastor or Minister or whatever, to be Biblical, you would "visit" several times before requesting "membership" of the Church". Now, say you struck gold and found a nice quiet Church with a wonderful godly Pastor. You visit several times. You read the "creed" of said church. You agree. After visiting a few more times, you are accepted as a member. Yeah! After the 4th visit, the Pastor of the Church begins to speak of your nation in a fashion that is ungodly, altogether leaving his Bible in his car. You question rather you may have been wrong in your choice. You do not attend Church to hear political views of clergy folk, but to hear the Word of God. Since you are not a mute invalid, you make a wise decision to leave said service and consider the possibility that you were mistaken in choice of Church and/or Pastor. You may even attend once more just to be sure. If a man, claiming to be a vessel of God, used to preach the Gospel to the people commits sin, by preaching , intolerance, political issues, as if it were appropriate to bash the government during Worship services, and even encourage his flock to sin as well, by leading them to disrespect their leaders, 9 times out of 10, he will do it again.
And again. And again. Until he gets caught or thrown out of the Church by its elders.
But back to the mere pew warmer. Obama. He has known this Pastor for over 20 years, long enough to know what kind of Spiritual/Biblical views the man believed and taught. (Unless he wasnt really listening to the man, or rarely attended service.)
If one associates themselves with a Church by becoming a member of its congregation, a pupil under its Pastor and protected by its power, this person can not claim disassociation when convenient. Especially after having claimed alliance to it on national television in order to produce proof of Christianity, when challenged.. Obama chose this Church and the Pastor of the Church. He could have chosen another Church. He did not. He could have even grew a pair and rebuked the Pastor for sinfulness. He is a Presidential candidate, no? Backswimming from a Presidential Candidate is so unbecoming and leaves one....untrusting, to say the least. | |
|
| Mr.Wright Posted: 3/18/2008 8:37:30 AM | MG, that's why I wish POF would allow us to create hyperlinks in here. It would save a lot of unnecessarily long posts. | |
|
| Mr.Wright Posted: 3/18/2008 8:51:23 AM | There seems to be a growing segment of society that is more concerned with a candidates religious affiliations than their political ideology.
Theocracy here we come! | |
|
| Mr.Wright Posted: 3/18/2008 8:58:11 AM | How come a serving President, with a guy like Falwell VISITING the White House (and being officially mourned by the President) raised ZERO eyebrows ?
He was already elected, and not one of the people I'm seeing here expressing such outrage probably even gave it a second thought.
Maybe a few of Jerry's videotaped rants should have been posted on YouTube and tied to Bush.  | |
|
| Mr.Wright Posted: 3/18/2008 9:27:22 AM | We all must keep in mind this context, too, that churches like Trinity are not all that unique in their radicalism. Many popular black-centered churches are vociferously anti-Bush, anti-White, and pro-African-American. The astonishing things I've read the past few days since this story exploded has been a real eye-opener regarding this phenomenon. I really think the white population in this country has no idea just how radical many of these churches are? If some say Obama should have just picked up and left for another black church, I think he just would have just traded one embarrassment for another unless he was very careful about exactly which one he picked. In defense, there are many radical white churches that preach racism, too.
However, that said, churches like Trinity started out as a product of the environment in which they reside, and in many cases that means inner-city ghettos and economically depressed communities largely abandoned and left to die. The people that make up these church congregations are mostly made up of the poor and disenfranchised (or feel as such), and harbor a special hate and anger for a power structure they feel ignores them. This is not an apology for the black community; just what I believe is the reality.
This in no way excuses what Wright said or his obvious political beliefs. Even for all the racism he might have endured in his life, for someone to benefit as much as he has (his congregation is the largest African-American one in the country, and I'm sure it's financial base is quite secure), and then "damn" the very country he calls home, "should" be firmly rebuked and criticized. If he really does feel as strongly about how unfair life is here, I have no problem with him leaving. I'd even help him to the door and say good riddance.
I do not think Obama shares Wright's views, nor has any secret wish to tear down the country if elected. Nothing in his educational background or political life has revealed any of Wright's radicalism, so I will give Obama the benefit of doubt until conclusively proven otherwise. I strongly urge others to do the same. | |
|
| Mr.Wright Posted: 3/18/2008 10:33:43 AM |
There seems to be a growing segment of society that is more concerned with a candidates religious affiliations than their political ideology.
Theocracy here we come! [ and Naw, really, you should skim through the Book of Revelation. The topic refering to the exact statement you voiced is found there. The fact that those outside of the Church have begun to notice and rebell is actual confirmation of It's contents.. 10 ninja points for you!
How come a serving President, with a guy like Falwell VISITING the White House (and being officially mourned by the President) raised ZERO eyebrows ?
He was already elected, and not one of the people I'm seeing here expressing such outrage probably even gave it a second thought.
Maybe a few of Jerry's videotaped rants should have been posted on YouTube and tied to Bush. Deflecting again, puppet?
We all must keep in mind this context, too, that churches like Trinity are not all that unique in their radicalism. Many popular black-centered churches are vociferously anti-Bush, anti-White, and pro-African-American
*prays for strength* LOL Lord knows that I dislike rebuking any post that is not Pro-Obama, *musters strength* but did you state that many black-centered churches are anti-white? Pluuuuuse give a citation. ~Any Christ centered Church is not anti-anything. | |
|
| Mr.Wright Posted: 3/18/2008 10:54:18 AM | Any Christ centered Church is not anti-anything.
Maybe "churches" is not the right term. There are plenty of religious "organizations" that promote radicalism which include race-oriented themes. Trinity is just one case. If you don't think so, you haven't been reading/seeing Wright's sermons that's been the whole focus of this issue? | |
|
| Mr.Wright Posted: 3/18/2008 12:09:04 PM | WOW!!! So THIS is where everybody's gone, eh?!!
I see so many of my old friends , allies , and debate adversaries !!! And I miss you all -- even Insolent1, SouthernLass, and (is that -- ???) Sum1Real over there??!! Hey, pal!
We're missing Deagle, though. I may have to send him a message in invite.
So what are talking about today? Anybody catch Obama's response today on this most recent, issue-diverting, mudslinging, and particularly-below-the-belt momentum and campaigning-killing effort?
Ya know ... it's really tough not to love this guy! Rather than retreat and publicly disown Mr. Wright, he steps up, grabs the rather thorny issue by the horns and (in MY view, at least) wrestles it down to the ground as best as could be hoped or expected.
Here is the full video and print versions, for those who may be interested:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp=23690824???
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/18/us/politics/18text-obama.html
 | |
|
| Mr.Wright Posted: 3/18/2008 12:23:24 PM | Sadly, it seems like Carlos Mencia called it months ago. People on this post might be envisioning this happening.
http://www.comedycentral.com/motherload/?ml_video=89492
There are plenty of nuts out there advising and associated to prominent people right and left. Does it mean they share those views? No. I don't think McCain is persuaded by his racist spiritual adviser nor do I think Obama is influenced either.
I personally think a lot of organized religious figures have lost it. It doesn't matter the affiliation of that religion. Maybe it is time we all start using our own minds instead of relying on a group to tell us how to think. I know, a horrible anti-american concept but hell it seems between McCain's, Obama's nutty advisors and priests having sex with kids, it might be about time. | |
|
|
| Page 4 of 29
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 |
|