|
|
|
|
|
| The infamous NICE GUY rant Posted: 8/16/2006 5:16:09 AM | my brother is one of the nicest guys you will ever meet. sure he will let his girlfriend walk all over him but she better clean the house and have two meals ready for him and she can do all the walkign she likes. my brother is no wimp It's just in his mind there isn't much that there is worth fighting over. If he gets into a fight with her it's over something that matters other wise he just say yes ma'am . He is not romanic. but if she tells him she wants to go and she wants flowers and if it doesn't get in the way of anything that swhat he will be doing that night. He doesn't complain about all he has done for her he's happy to do it. and he always states just what he thinks, and needs he wouldn't bother telling anyone what he wants if he doesn't think they can provide it.
if you don't speak up how is a girl to know? we aren't mind readers. I personaly don't like people giving me flowers it's just I read this book when i was small and impressible and, what I got from it was the flower is the sexauly organ or a plant and your going to ripeit off give it to someone and they are going to put it on display Frankly that really use to freak me out an dit really doesn't make a lot of since if I get flowers I would like them to have roots. but I'm getting off track here just because your a nice guy doesn't mean you have to "give in" all the time if it's not worth fighting over then I will give into anything I don't like fighting but if it matters to me i will stand up for my self (and still try to avoid a fight. thats where learning tact comes in) | |
|
| The infamous NICE GUY rant Posted: 8/16/2006 5:38:22 AM | the thing I find most amusing (and yeah I mean this about the original article and the compulsion that the OP must have had to post it) about the forums on POF...is that there are so many people who are quite obviously not all that good at relationships (I include myself here) or else they wouldn't be wasting their time online on a dating site...they'd be frolicking with their love in the real world (if not then they aint got much of a keeper) who are so eager to trot out advice on relationships. Too effing funny. The blind leading the blind...
 | |
|
| The infamous NICE GUY rant Posted: 8/16/2006 5:44:56 AM | You know .. up untill I joined this site about a month ago .. I thought that I was a nice guy .. I am an azz hole acording to this post .. and the dozens like them. I dont want to be an azz .. I like being nice .. or is it just that I have all the answers that I need in my life and am fishing in a pond of confused people. Get me out of here .. I like being nice. oh .. and delete this thread .. its pure propaganda.
 | |
|
| The infamous NICE GUY rant Posted: 8/16/2006 5:47:50 AM | Man, some people can hit the nail on the head. Yeah, that was me 10 years ago and every bit of it was true. No more. And my relationships now are much better for it.
Props. | |
|
| The infamous NICE GUY rant Posted: 8/16/2006 6:49:51 AM | People reel each other in with a fasle face to some extent. Then they are equals or not. Saying one LET the other run over them is like blaming a store clerk for getting shot by an armed robber. For those of u not relating to last sentence go take the Millers analigies test. The intial post here does not understand basic human relations and the power all people give each other, or take away which is what I am doing(for those of u tryin to catch up) . | |
|
| The infamous NICE GUY rant Posted: 8/18/2006 10:17:06 PM | | Well put must-love-cats! But I agree with the poster who said that what you are describing is a man - a well adjusted one at that. I was married to a "nice guy" who was such a chameleon he had no identity of his own. Passive aggressive - they can't bear to face the truth about themselves and when they fail it is always your fault. Male or female - these people can never be filled up and tend to suck you dry. | |
|
| The infamous NICE GUY rant Posted: 8/18/2006 11:07:34 PM | The cut and paste from the OP is the stupidest piece of sh*t I've ever read. My thoughts after reading it - and I did read it all - DUUUUUUUUUUUUHHHHHHH !!!!!!! 
Guys who are doormats don't have successful relationships? Really? Holy sh*t, what a revelation!!!! Come to think of it, neither do women who are like that. OH MY GOD, it's the answer we've all been waiting for!!!!!
GIVE ME A F*CKING BREAK.
NICE DOES NOT EQUAL WEAK NICE DOES NOT EQUAL INSECURE NICE DOES NOT EQUAL SELF-HATING NICE DOES NOT EQUAL SUFFOCATING OR CLINGY NICE DOES NOT EQUAL ANY OF THE OTHER STUPID LABELS THE OP USED.
Did it ever occur to any of the geniuses who puked out a chorus of that people do not have to be either one extreme or the other? That not being a mean, inconsiderate, selfish as*hole does not necessarily mean you are the exact opposite? No - it hasn't occurred to any of you....it's much easier to read these cleverly written, conveniently superficial Dr. Phil-esque nuggets, than to use your fu*king brains.
NICE CAN MEAN GROUNDED NICE CAN ALSO MEAN FLEXIBLE YET STRONG NICE CAN ALSO MEAN SELF-ASSURED NICE CAN ALSO MEAN DECISIVE AND FORCEFUL NICE CAN ALSO MEAN ASSERTIVE
People who are confident can still be nice. People who don't need a relationship to have a great life can still be nice. People who have a good sense of self can still be nice. People who stand up for their rights can still be nice. People who know what they want and don't rely on others can still be nice. People who don't accept less than second-best can still be nice.
For the love of Christ or whatever deity you worship - stop thinking in extremes and convenient labels that justify your easy, cop-out, IGNORANT FU*KING STEREOTYPES.
The lack of critical thinking on these forums is absolutely maddening 
HOW'S THAT FOR A RANT...... | |
|
| The infamous NICE GUY rant Posted: 8/19/2006 5:48:09 AM | | For a rant it was immature, filled with teenage explicatives, had angst better reserved for a couch session with a skilled social worker or an anger management advisor. Your opinion would have been better received if it had been deilivered in a mature fashion. Good day to you. | |
|
| The infamous NICE GUY rant Posted: 8/20/2006 12:33:34 AM | Oh my profound apologies, sir, that it did not live up to your lofty standards.
It just means the world to me that people on the internet approve of my words. Perhaps you can take your self-righteous, condescending, high-falootin' self and kiss my a**.
If you had the critical thinking skills (and the spelling skills - it's "expletives", dumba$$) to interpret the message, and realize it was railing against the OP's ignorant, stereotypical, and just plain stupid generalizations (which were ripped off the highly credible internet site "heartlessbitches.com"), perhaps you would have "received" it better.
And a good day to you, sir. If you happen to be crossing the street, I would encourage all approaching vehicles to avoid hitting you. But not if it's in any way inconvenient.  | |
|
| The infamous NICE GUY rant Posted: 8/20/2006 3:30:34 AM | It is called communication skills, not lofty standards. It is called getting your ideas across without resorting to childish language. It is pointing out you attacked a whole group of people with your lack of tact and care. Its a shame someone can reach your age and still have no inclination toward civility. I can only imagine the kind of pain and suffering you must have gone through in life and go through on a daily basis if your mind constantly revolves around such hostility. You were quite liberal with your generalizations as well. I have heard that almost all anger that you feel towards others is actually anger that you feel towards yourself. Perhaps you don't get to voice your opinion in the real world and are using this venue to "let go"?
If your rantings make you feel better I am glad for you. I do however believe your relief is probably short lived. There are better ways of handling stress. Your rant about ignorance sterotypical generalizations is interesting because you can see you did the same thing in your first post. If you stop and let go of the need to fight for one second can you see that?
I have questions regarding the credibility of an internet site called "heartless****es.com" but I will admit my ignorance and check it out in the near future. Wishing you truly the best, not sarcastically. | |
|
| The infamous NICE GUY rant Posted: 8/23/2006 8:08:47 PM | I am so sick of seeing these threads.
There is nothing wrong with being a nice person. Being a nice person does not make someone ineffectual, a wimp, insecure, etc.
It's so stupid.
Yeah, nice guys don't "score". Yeah, they don't get girls. Why? Because they don't play games or misrepresent themselves.
Our society needs more nice guys. Part of the problem with our society is that being male is equated with being abrasive, rude, in it for yourself, and having a lack of compassion and respect for others. Men are afraid to treat women and other people in general well for fear of being booted out of the "dude" club.
Yeah, the jerks do well. They do. Because they're good b*llsh*tters. They go for women that are weak-minded, naive, etc. But they never seem to maintain relationships. They just go through one woman after another. The nice guys don't succeed because they don't want to play a game, which is all that the jerks are doing.
I'm so sick of "nice" being equated with something negative. One can be sensitive and strong at the same time.
I'm not changing who I am. If I end up alone for the rest of my life, then so be it. I'm not succumbing to the frat-boy culture.
There is nothing wrong with opening your heart to a woman. There is nothing wrong with being romantic. There is nothing wrong with being a good, respectful person. Any woman who doesn't want flowers on a first date or be told that she is loved isn't someone worth being with because she obviously doesn't love herself or want to be loved. Either that or she just wants convenience. And of course people in general are so cynical anymore. | |
|
| The infamous NICE GUY rant Posted: 8/24/2006 12:48:30 AM |
I am so sick of seeing these threads.
There is nothing wrong with being a nice person. Being a nice person does not make someone ineffectual, a wimp, insecure, etc.
It's so stupid.
Yeah, nice guys don't "score". Yeah, they don't get girls. Why? Because they don't play games or misrepresent themselves.
Our society needs more nice guys. Part of the problem with our society is that being male is equated with being abrasive, rude, in it for yourself, and having a lack of compassion and respect for others. Men are afraid to treat women and other people in general well for fear of being booted out of the "dude" club.
Yeah, the jerks do well. They do. Because they're good b*llsh*tters. They go for women that are weak-minded, naive, etc. But they never seem to maintain relationships. They just go through one woman after another. The nice guys don't succeed because they don't want to play a game, which is all that the jerks are doing.
I'm so sick of "nice" being equated with something negative. One can be sensitive and strong at the same time.
I'm not changing who I am. If I end up alone for the rest of my life, then so be it. I'm not succumbing to the frat-boy culture.
There is nothing wrong with opening your heart to a woman. There is nothing wrong with being romantic. There is nothing wrong with being a good, respectful person. Any woman who doesn't want flowers on a first date or be told that she is loved isn't someone worth being with because she obviously doesn't love herself or want to be loved. Either that or she just wants convenience. And of course people in general are so cynical anymore.
 | |
|
| |
| The infamous NICE GUY rant Posted: 8/24/2006 12:43:25 PM | | Funny thing is, my ex ex is wot I wud class as a "Nice Girl", and she drove my mad wiv her insecurity. When I stayed at my parents for two weeks ova chrimbo she wud ring me at like 6am in the morn on my mobile then straight after she would ring me on the house phone, if she knew I had gone out the night b4. And then she claimed she wasn't insecure HAHAHA. So glad I ditched her sorry ass. Afta I ditched her she climbed onto me for sex so I flung her off me and the look on her face was priceless. | |
|
| The infamous NICE GUY rant Posted: 8/24/2006 1:11:27 PM | In Iwarriors statement, and to all those who give him a : you are completing your own self-fulfilling prophecy by believing your own lies. This is not meant to be an antagonistic post, so hear me out objectively before your rebuttal is posted. Let me explain how you are lying to yourself to justify your own behaviour, and how lying to yourself is common "nice guy/doormat" behaviour, which makes this subject so much more difficult, because the ones it is meant to help are the same ones that can't understand the words because of their own emotional walls connected to being a "nice guy/doormat".
The following is not intended for people who consider themselves nice guys, but possess all or most of the "normal guy/real man" traits. Sit back and think about which one you are. If you are a nice guy that generally is not afraid of people (male or female), or not afraid of being in a big group of people, not afraid to speak in public with all attention on you and things of this nature than you are probably a well rounded, non-doormat nice guy, and this post is not aimed at you. Now, if you occasionally think that people are making fun of you behind your back, and that worries you, or the idea of formal speaking in front of a large group of people scares you, or you don't have as much success with women as most men do, then you may benefit from this post.
Iwarrior: I read your profile and I hope it's okay that I share parts of it with the audience of this thread to help me underline the ideas I'm trying to convey. First off, your profile is very well written grammatically, congratulations, but I see the "nice guy" shining through in your words. Your profile will be viewed by women as one belonging to a man that is overly apologetic, unsure, approval seeking and "wussy". No woman wants that. These are just my opinions, and I'm only trying to help, but maybe I'm way off base anyway. Either way, let me explain why I believe this to be true:
Your headliner: Hey, hey hey, don't just walk on by.
While this is different and clever, here is what I think the confident, no time wasting, "desirable" girl will see: Hey! Please give me a chance before you ignore me like the rest.
It kinda smells like you've been "walked by" too many times before, you know? So, "desirable" women see this and will take the hint from the previous girls that have "walked by", because "desirable" women don't want to waste your time, or theirs by picking up the baggage of, an under-confident due to over rejected/self-esteem issued, man. Yes, from a male point of view it is an unfair game that women play, but it is instinctual for them to make such snap decisions. Here's why. Imagine if you were a "desirable" woman. That means you get hit on 10 or more times per day by every kind of guy imaginable, from the aggressive to the rich to the "nice". She has to filter through these personalities quickly to find the ones she is interested in, and if you're not what she is interested in, you'll know it quickly. This is the reason some of you might consider the really hot girls to be "bit*hes". The truth is, she knows exactly what she wants, and won't bother wasting precious time with anything less, and she has every right to do this, since she can just about get any guy she wants.
Your final statement was also something that seemed kind of like you were begging for approval. It was two phrases that read something like: If you will go out with me, you might be known as the girlfriend of a rockstar someday. If I've captured your imagination, drop me a line.
The first sentence is humourous, but the way you worded it sounded more like a bribe done by someone that's running out of game. How about: If I choose to go out with you, you might get to be a rockstars girlfriend someday. You see? Second sentence also sounds like your asking for her to like you, and not the other way around as it should be. Maybe: If you think you can keep up to me and have your imagination captured, then why don't you drop me a line.
Now, I'm going to dissect your post. I'm going to show you what I promised earlier, why it's a lie to yourself.
"Yeah, nice guys don't get the girls. Why? Because we don't play games or misrepresent ourselves."
Guys that are succesful with women misrepresent themselves less often than a "nice guy/doormat". Being successful with desirable women does not in any way mean that you are being caniving, or that you are operating smoothly with a hidden agenda. In fact, it's quite the opposite. Being successful with those types of women usually requires the honesty of a confident man. It requires being a sexual power that understands that he is trying to convey attraction to a woman through attitude and body language, and has no fear of doing so. That does not mean that this man simply wants to get in her pants, but only that he is interested in her as much as one can be on a first meeting with a women. He is interested in beggining the courting process, and if things work beyond that, perhaps more. This is the early stages of the courtship process from EVERY man's perspective, but tactics vary greatly. The "nice guy/doormat" will shy away from conveying a sexual attraction in it's instinctive form, and instead will resort to things like: buying drinks/gifts, being a "good friend" when you hardly know her, and just tip-toeing around the issue of sexuality and dating. DESIRABLE women view this type of behaviour as dishonest, and it is. Women that are desirable do not appreciate this type of behaviour because they understand the true motives behind them, yet you can't make a move since the thought of doing so paralyzes you with fear. So you see, this type of behaviour is the truly misrepresental one, masked by being a good deed or two with no valid reason, but always wanting more.
"Part of the problem with our society is that being male is equated with being abrasive, rude, in it for yourself, and having a lack of compassion and respect for others. Men are afraid to treat women and other people in general well for fear of being booted out of the "dude" club."
The kind of male that has this attitude is not usually one that is successful with women. Women aren't stupid you know, they can see right through that chovenistic, brutish, rudeness almost immediately. You are talking about the type of guy that actively seeks out fights so he can beat up on others cause he's bigger or stronger, and not the type that's just defending his rights or pride in a fight. You are talking about a wife abuser. You are talking about the type of guy that would violate a woman's privacy by wooing her by getting her drunk, and then secretly broadcasting his conquest of her in the bedroom over the internet with a hidden camera. I assure you that most men that are like this are not successful with women the way they truly want to be. The problem is that you have associated men that are honestly successful with women as being of this type as well, which is a stereotype you have to stop believing.
"I'm not changing who I am. If I end up alone for the rest of my life, then so be it."
No, no one is suggesting that you change your personality, but trying different methods to attract the women you want does not mean you are changing yourself. This thinking is like refusing to take a defensive driving course on the basis that you don't want to change who you are, despite all the accidents you get into.
"There is nothing wrong with opening your heart to a woman. There is nothing wrong with being romantic. Any woman who doesn't want flowers on a first date or be told that she is loved isn't someone worth being with."
That's true, but not before she is attracted to you. A first date set of flowers depends on how well you know her. If you don't know her that well, than the flowers are to bribe her to have feelings of attraction toward you, which IS sneaky and underhanded. If you sense that the woman you are trying to woo is not attracted to you, and you try to pull this stuff off, that IS wrong and rude. It's wrong because it is a blackmail tactic. It's like saying, "I really love/like you and I think you should go out with me" before she is attracted to you. When you do this, it is intended as a come on with a tiny bit of guilt attached because they don't feel the same way you do about them. Doing this before you have established the attraction is most certainly wrong, and a typical "nice guy/doormat" type of behaviour.
Saying that you are righteous for behaving this way is your lie to yourself, but it's only because society has taught you to act this way. I won't go into how society does this, but I could prove it with another long winded essay or two. For now, you'll just have to believe me. One truth that must be admitted, on behalf of all men is this. If we see a woman and find her attractive, we immediately think lusty thoughts. This is true for ALL male personalities, be it "nice guys", "real men", "bad boys" etc. But, the "nice guy/doormat" personality views himself as being above his own biology by doing the things that "nice guy/doormats" do. Sometimes the "nice guy/doormat" can be found listening to a woman complain about something and being reassuring even when she's wrong, or when he'd rather be anywhere else. This is his classic behaviour, among others. Do not justify this type of behaviour to yourself as being the right thing to do, because when you act this way, your motivation is to gain her approval and hopefully become romantically involved, and your motivation is not to genuinely help her. What do you think what you call an "a$$hole" would do in the same situation? He'd point out where he believes that she acted inappropriately, and tell her that she should make amends. That does genuinely help her, and he won't have to listen to her complaints anymore either. This is what women mean when they say that they want "honesty".
Summary: You either still feel you are right, and will continue acting this way. Or, you will realize that there must be a reason that "a$$holes" are getting all the women you want, and then you will realize that maybe the common denominator with your lack of luck for women actually is you, and maybe there is a way to work on it instead of blaming the rest of society for your entire life. Your choice. I made my choice to come to the "dark side" a few years ago, and even though I'm not the super-stud I'd like to be, it's a road well worth travelling.
Good luck. | |
|
| The infamous NICE GUY rant Posted: 8/24/2006 3:18:14 PM | I do so love when ignorance and arrogance convince mask themselves as logic and reason confusing even those with good intentions. Poster 91 you very much remind me of another individual who likes to post long winded text but doesn't actually think the entire equation through. However in the interests of discussion and the hope that eyes can be opened..
"nice guy" does not exist. "doormat" does not exist. These are parables fables of absolutes created to convey an idea. Some have posted the works of another and decided to pass these off as legitimate beginnings to discussion and repair. They are not its supermarket phsycology and its not acurate or helpful. To make the issue clearer about why its bad to continue this "nice guy"="doormat" insanity let me take it out of context and bring you into another concept with more measurable results.
Lets say you have an infection and I give you penicillen which clears it up. If I continue to treat everyone with an infection the same way I am likely to cure many others, until I reach the person who is allergic to penicillen if I give it to him.. he dies. Or until I come across an infection that has a bacteria that is not effected by penicillen at which point something else needs to be used. But Fireknight that has nothing to do with "nice guys" Well actaully it does.
Lets take the "nice guy" senario for a moment there is a number of factors that go into the stories here but the simplest of them sums up as the following.
Person A with shall we call them social graces observes either directly that Person B without social graces has interactions with Person C who despite all indicators that should be warnings against Person B such as lack of social graces continues that interaction. Person A continues to show Person C that there are better behaved and perhaps more respectable options then Person B. Person C smiles pats Person A on the head and runs off with Person B anyway.
Now things get interesting the reality is there is more then one story going on here, and therefor more then one answer to what is going on contrary to the ignorance often reposted here. For brevities sake I will stick to the three simpilest and most obvious and we are going to call the end result an infection just to tie in the penicillin point
Cause of infection 1 Person A while maintaining social graces and politeness is not sincere Person A is faking it in the belief that somehow they will get something out of it hopefully Person C. Person C by some means of insight realizes this and figures the Genuine lack of redeeming qualities of Person B is easier to deal with then Person A's deluding nature.
Cause of infection 2 Person C has been subjected to abuse over time Person C has come to believe that affection is demonstrated by abuse. Person A overwhelms Person C's ability to understand what Person C has come to accept as normal and so clings to Person B who treats Person C as what they understand to be normal.
Cause of infection 3 Person B has learned by watching others and societal cues that there is no advantage in being a redeemable person. Person B has also learned that people such as Person C find excitement in danger and since Person B really doesn't care about anything but themselves B figures as long as C can be kept around with little effort the advantage is Person B's.
Now here we are one infection, and three causes. Just like the infection I mentioned before penicillin can have three effects. It could work, it could kill, it could do nothing.
Now comes along the "web experts" who are each of us. Since those who are untrained relate with what the most understand how do you think the choices of treatment are going to go?
Bottom line. Drop the fictional its useless to talk in stereo types. Listen to what people are saying and try to understand where they are comming from. Contrary to the opinions posted the common Denominator in someone's relationships is not always them. Sometimes infact most times there is FAR more involved if you take the time to look.
So when I say Iwarrior posts well he does.
He presents the fact that Person A is not always disengenious. That society has some responsiblities for the lack of civility and increase in violence hate and intolerance that are VERY evident these days. That a person can choose to take the harder path of not bowing to those presures and live as they belive is right. Not to gain but because it is right.
He represents another option several here are afraid to face because really people don't like what they don't understand. | |
|
| The infamous NICE GUY rant Posted: 8/24/2006 5:51:15 PM | | This is the most concise and well communicated version of what I believe. Thanks for writing it here. Amen to strong, sensitive, NICE guys! If the women don't like it, they are missing out big time. I'll not hear any more ****ing about guys who treat women like crap. | |
|
| The infamous NICE GUY rant Posted: 8/24/2006 6:41:11 PM | I don't see anything too wrong with the original post except for the word nice. Replace every instance of the word "nice" with "insecure doormat" and retitle it, "The infamous Insecure Doormat rant" and you have yourself a moderately legitimate post and opinion.
I'm guessing that the original author felt that by using the word "nice", instead of the words "insecure doormat", he could create a much more interesting, controversial, and heated post. By the looks of this thread he was right. What's the word for that again? Oh yeah.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll
For those of you who read this post and decided that hrmm, maybe it's not good to be nice anymore, I think I'll be a d*ck instead... To quote Douglas Adams, "So long and thanks for all the [extra] fish." Get it? Plenty of fish? Oh never mind, it was a bad joke and you're probably too stupid to understand anyway. | |
|
| The infamous NICE GUY rant Posted: 8/24/2006 7:13:47 PM | There are "Nice Guys: who have enough intestinal fortitude to be themselves / be comfortable around the ladies / be understanding and a good listener without giving up their right to opinions and views / be independant yet be part of a couple too / be comfortable with themselves. There are "Nice Guys" who are, as the article stated, insecure / overbearing / door mats / or will settle for anything rather than be alone. The latter are not realy nice guys ...... they are desperate ....... and everything they do is focused on getting a girl/mate/partner rather than finding something interesting and compatable / finding a person they could appreciate and be appreciated by --- giving respect and getting it freely in return / finding an equal /. This type may consider themselves nice guys - but there is a vast difference. I am a nice guy, but I would never be a door mat or date someone I didn't at least expect to rrespect or treat someone to my life without some expectation of equality. That is what a partner/mate/whatever has to have .. and it covers both genders and all lifestyles. The labels are self affixed (Nice Guy / Nice Girl) but the scrutiny is up to us to be certain. | |
|
| The infamous NICE GUY rant Posted: 8/24/2006 7:22:04 PM |
In Iwarriors statement, and to all those who give him a : you are completing your own self-fulfilling prophecy by believing your own lies. This is not meant to be an antagonistic post, so hear me out objectively before your rebuttal is posted. Let me explain how you are lying to yourself to justify your own behaviour, and how lying to yourself is common "nice guy/doormat" behaviour, which makes this subject so much more difficult, because the ones it is meant to help are the same ones that can't understand the words because of their own emotional walls connected to being a "nice guy/doormat".
The following is not intended for people who consider themselves nice guys, but possess all or most of the "normal guy/real man" traits. Sit back and think about which one you are. If you are a nice guy that generally is not afraid of people (male or female), or not afraid of being in a big group of people, not afraid to speak in public with all attention on you and things of this nature than you are probably a well rounded, non-doormat nice guy, and this post is not aimed at you. Now, if you occasionally think that people are making fun of you behind your back, and that worries you, or the idea of formal speaking in front of a large group of people scares you, or you don't have as much success with women as most men do, then you may benefit from this post.
Ok, first of all, who's lying to oneself here? I know what I am.
Secondly, the vast majority of people are fearful of speaking in public. It's a common, normal fear. It does not make someone inferior to someone else. Not being afraid of public speakign doesn't make someone desireable.
Most people at some point feel "less than" for whatever reason. That is normal.
I am not the****of-the-walk, and have no desire to be that way. If women don't find that attractive, then whatever. I don't need them. I was taught to be humble, not a hotshot flash in the pan.
"Iwarrior: I read your profile and I hope it's okay that I share parts of it with the audience of this thread to help me underline the ideas I'm trying to convey. First off, your profile is very well written grammatically, congratulations, but I see the "nice guy" shining through in your words. Your profile will be viewed by women as one belonging to a man that is overly apologetic, unsure, approval seeking and "wussy". No woman wants that. These are just my opinions, and I'm only trying to help, but maybe I'm way off base anyway. Either way, let me explain why I believe this to be true:
Your headliner: Hey, hey hey, don't just walk on by.
While this is different and clever, here is what I think the confident, no time wasting, "desirable" girl will see: Hey! Please give me a chance before you ignore me like the rest."
Yeah, you're way off base.
I honestly do not see how anything in my post lead you to believe that women find me "wussy". Unless it's because I don't go on and on about how great I am.
Women generally don't make the first move anyway, and I've had a lot of women message me first.
Meanwhile you say in your listing that you put the "G" in "geek". Who's self-effacing here?
And your main pic is of your car. What message does that send?
And what is a "desirable" girl anyway? Some blonde bimbo?
It kinda smells like you've been "walked by" too many times before, you know? So, "desirable" women see this and will take the hint from the previous girls that have "walked by", because "desirable" women don't want to waste your time, or theirs by picking up the baggage of, an under-confident due to over rejected/self-esteem issued, man.
Do you REALLY think people read my headline and have all of those things running through their minds? Please.
I said what I said because I wanted to be different, funny, and get people's attention w/o being an obnoxious, fatuous jackass.
Yes, from a male point of view it is an unfair game that women play, but it is instinctual for them to make such snap decisions. Here's why. Imagine if you were a "desirable" woman. That means you get hit on 10 or more times per day by every kind of guy imaginable, from the aggressive to the rich to the "nice". She has to filter through these personalities quickly to find the ones she is interested in, and if you're not what she is interested in, you'll know it quickly. This is the reason some of you might consider the really hot girls to be "bit*hes". The truth is, she knows exactly what she wants, and won't bother wasting precious time with anything less, and she has every right to do this, since she can just about get any guy she wants."
You're thinking way too much about this.
I don't want Paris Hilton, ok? How many women get hit on 10 times a day anyway? Please.
Your final statement was also something that seemed kind of like you were begging for approval. It was two phrases that read something like: If you will go out with me, you might be known as the girlfriend of a rockstar someday. If I've captured your imagination, drop me a line.
I was being funny.
The first sentence is humourous, but the way you worded it sounded more like a bribe done by someone that's running out of game. How about: If I choose to go out with you, you might get to be a rockstars girlfriend someday. You see? Second sentence also sounds like your asking for her to like you, and not the other way around as it should be. Maybe: If you think you can keep up to me and have your imagination captured, then why don't you drop me a line.
I think that's stupid.
Guys that are succesful with women misrepresent themselves less often than a "nice guy/doormat".
What is "successful with women" mean? All I want is one girl. That's it. I don't want to date a million women.
And yes they do misrepresent themselves. Their "confidence" is a mask.
Being successful with desirable women does not in any way mean that you are being caniving, or that you are operating smoothly with a hidden agenda.
Again, what is a desirable woman? And yeah, guys that get lots of dates and screw around are usually liars. They don't want a real relationship. They just want as many notches on their belt as they can get. You talk about it as if it were a game. I do not want to play a game.
In fact, it's quite the opposite. Being successful with those types of women usually requires the honesty of a confident man.
No. It usually requires being a liar and having a lot of money. If of course I'm thinking of the kind of women you [probably want.
I want women to like me because they think I'm a good person and because they find me attractive, interesting, funny, and smart. I don't want a woman to be attracted to me because I think I am the king of the mountain.
It requires being a sexual power that understands that he is trying to convey attraction to a woman through attitude and body language, and has no fear of doing so.
Ok, what men's rag did you crib that from?
That does not mean that this man simply wants to get in her pants, but only that he is interested in her as much as one can be on a first meeting with a women.
Nah, he wants to get in her pants.
Of course, upon first meeting a woman, I'm not going to totally fawn over her. I can't fall in love with a woman I barely know.
He is interested in beggining the courting process, and if things work beyond that, perhaps more.
That's what I want too.
This is the early stages of the courtship process from EVERY man's perspective, but tactics vary greatly. The "nice guy/doormat" will shy away from conveying a sexual attraction in it's instinctive form, and instead will resort to things like: buying drinks/gifts, being a "good friend" when you hardly know her, and just tip-toeing around the issue of sexuality and dating.
So, in other words, be a pig and view her as just another conquest. And of course, she'll just submit to your machismo because she doesn't respect herself right?
DESIRABLE women view this type of behaviour as dishonest, and it is.
A woman I find desirable will not see me as dishonest by acting like a gentleman. I want to get to know a woman for a while before we start having sex. I don't want a f*ckbuddy.
Women that are desirable do not appreciate this type of behaviour because they understand the true motives behind them,
What are my true motives? *GASP* I know! I want a meaningful relationship! The horror!!!!!
yet you can't make a move since the thought of doing so paralyzes you with fear. So you see, this type of behaviour is the truly misrepresental one, masked by being a good deed or two with no valid reason, but always wanting more.
If I meet a girl I really like and care about, f*cking the hell out of her isn't the first thing on my mind. I'm not afraid of anything. It's not as if I really want to nail her but am afraid to make a move. Even if I do, I'm not going to act like a sleazeball or a creep.
The kind of male that has this attitude is not usually one that is successful with women.
And you are?
Women aren't stupid you know,
You seem to think they are.
they can see right through that chovenistic, brutish, rudeness almost immediately. You are talking about the type of guy that actively seeks out fights so he can beat up on others cause he's bigger or stronger,
Not necessarily.
and not the type that's just defending his rights or pride in a fight.
I've done that many times. Again, you're equating being a decent person with being a wimp.
You are talking about a wife abuser. You are talking about the type of guy that would violate a woman's privacy by wooing her by getting her drunk, and then secretly broadcasting his conquest of her in the bedroom over the internet with a hidden camera.
Not only men like that.
I assure you that most men that are like this are not successful with women the way they truly want to be.
Oh, I think they are.
The problem is that you have associated men that are honestly successful with women as being of this type as well, which is a stereotype you have to stop believing.
They get lots of ass. You have to have a lack of respect for women to be that way.
No, no one is suggesting that you change your personality, but trying different methods to attract the women you want does not mean you are changing yourself. This thinking is like refusing to take a defensive driving course on the basis that you don't want to change who you are, despite all the accidents you get into.
I don't really care anymore. I just want one girl. That's all. I don't want to play a game. This is not a sport. Love should happen naturally, w/o having to be prowling around.
That's true, but not before she is attracted to you.
But how do you know if she is or not? If you've known her for a while, and it's gone unrequited, then hell yes you should tell her.
A first date set of flowers depends on how well you know her. If you don't know her that well, than the flowers are to bribe her to have feelings of attraction toward you, which IS sneaky and underhanded.
I can agree with that.
If you sense that the woman you are trying to woo is not attracted to you, and you try to pull this stuff off, that IS wrong and rude. It's wrong because it is a blackmail tactic. It's like saying, "I really love/like you and I think you should go out with me" before she is attracted to you. When you do this, it is intended as a come on with a tiny bit of guilt attached because they don't feel the same way you do about them. Doing this before you have established the attraction is most certainly wrong, and a typical "nice guy/doormat" type of behaviour.
I'll agree with that.
Saying that you are righteous for behaving this way is your lie to yourself, but it's only because society has taught you to act this way.
I never said I was righteous. I am just being true to myself. I'm not a hot-shot. I don't want to be.
I won't go into how society does this, but I could prove it with another long winded essay or two. For now, you'll just have to believe me.
I'm having trouble believing you.
One truth that must be admitted, on behalf of all men is this. If we see a woman and find her attractive, we immediately think lusty thoughts. This is true for ALL male personalities, be it "nice guys", "real men", "bad boys" etc.
Eh, not necessarily. I used to lust after women, but they were usually ones I barely knew and didn't care much about. I grew out of that. Usually, I don't really become attracted to a girl unless I think she's interested in me, sending me some sort of signal or whatever.
I can see a pretty girl and not imagine getting her out of her clothes. In fact, I don't do that anymore. And of course it depends on how she's dressed and carries herself. I never leer at women. If I see a "hot" girl, I'll glance at her, and that's about it. I'm not interested in sleeping around anyway. I just want a relationship.
But, the "nice guy/doormat" personality views himself as being above his own biology by doing the things that "nice guy/doormats" do.
Being mature and having self-control doesn't mean that one is a doormat. You're justifying boorish behavior.
I don't want to screw every pretty girl I see. I really don't. We as a culture oversexualize women. No woman I've known wants to be lusted by every man that she passes when walking down the street.
It's not that I don't get horny. I do. A lot. But I take care of it, and forget about it.
Sometimes the "nice guy/doormat" can be found listening to a woman complain about something and being reassuring even when she's wrong, or when he'd rather be anywhere else.
That's not me.
This is his classic behaviour, among others. Do not justify this type of behaviour to yourself as being the right thing to do, because when you act this way, your motivation is to gain her approval and hopefully become romantically involved, and your motivation is not to genuinely help her.
So don't listen to women. Don't. Part of our society's problem is that we don't listen. If I really like a girl, I want her to confide in me. I want to confide in her. I want to help her if I can. I really don't see what is so wrong with that. You guys all have inverted all positive behaviors because you don't think it will get you laid, because in your world, a man is measured by how much sex he gets (as well as how much money you earn).
What do you think what you call an "a$$hole" would do in the same situation? He'd point out where he believes that she acted inappropriately, and tell her that she should make amends. That does genuinely help her, and he won't have to listen to her complaints anymore either. This is what women mean when they say that they want "honesty".
I would do that with a woman I cared about. It all depends. I mean, if I'm on a first date with a girl, and she's going on and on about something she was clearly wrong about, I probably wouldn;t want to see her again.
Summary: You either still feel you are right, and will continue acting this way. Or, you will realize that there must be a reason that "a$$holes" are getting all the women you want,
I don't want a woman who wants to be with an a$$hole.
and then you will realize that maybe the common denominator with your lack of luck for women actually is you,
I think it's a combination of things. I don't think there is anything seriously wrong with me. I think I'm a good person. I think I'm attractive. I think I am worthwhile. If other people don't see that then that's their problem not mine.
Your worldview (well, it's probably someone else's actually, some guy who writes for Maxim or something) assumes that women are weaker than men and want to be chased down like prey and dominated.
and maybe there is a way to work on it instead of blaming the rest of society for your entire life.
Oh our society is seriously screwed up. If you can't see that, then you are the one with your head in the sand. Really. And it's people who think like that that prevent our society from getting better.
I mean, capitalism is a-okay. The people on welfare are just lazy and stupid.
Your choice. I made my choice to come to the "dark side" a few years ago, and even though I'm not the super-stud I'd like to be, it's a road well worth travelling.
You don't seem to be someone I want to emulate.
Good luck.
Uh yeah Skippy. You too. | |
|
| The infamous NICE GUY rant Posted: 8/24/2006 8:55:39 PM | | One other thing. Sociopaths usually believe that decent normal people are faking and deep down want to be sociopathic. | |
|
| The infamous NICE GUY rant Posted: 8/24/2006 9:02:59 PM | For Fireknight:
I think I see what you're saying, and for the most part I agree with you, but there is one fundamental difference in the foundations of our arguments that is becoming more and more apparent to me. Before I get into that, tell me if the following assumption is consistent with your text:
Person A. Is generally someone who is stereotyped as a "nice guy". Not necessarily a "doormat" from what you've explained, but perhaps he shares some of that labels' traits. Person A does not believe he needs to change his methods of attracting a woman for fear of it being an immoral type of behaviour. He is sticking to that belief despite him not having the success with women he'd like to have and feels he deserves. He is also frustrated because he views himself as a more compassionate, understanding and deserving person for the affection of the woman he desires, but all the Person B's of the world just keeping getting the upper hand by having the relationships with women that the Person A's want. About right?
Person B. Is generally someone who is stereotyped as "alpha male/real man". Not necessarily a "jerk/chovenist" from what you've explained, but perhaps he shares some of that labels' traits. Person B approaches women with a definite intent, he is sexually interested in those women and uses the tactics most women admire in hopes of elevating the relationship between the two to something beyond acquaintances/friends. Person B isn't against the idea of a commited relationship with the woman he is attempting to attract, but she will have to work hard to keep his interest long enough for that to happen. For now, Person B is satisfied with exploring the physical aspect of their relationship, with no definite attempt at furthering that relationship as he has not been persuaded yet to think that a relationship between the two would work. Am I close?
Person C. Is generally what society (all the person A's and B's) in this world consider to be an attractive woman. Person C tends to be attracted to the Person B's in the world, but befriends Person A's.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You are trying to convey to me that most of the Person C's in this world really don't know what they're doing. You think that B's lie, cheat and canive their way into the hearts of C's. Meanwhile A's see themselves as being above the acts of B's, since any girl that would fall for a B is certainly under some intoxicated influence. So the A's refuse to use such under-handed tactics, and sit back blaming their lack of success on all the B's and C's of the world.
The B's never tell the whole truth to women. The B's always use every advantage they can to get what they want. The B's have no feelings either way about the woman they are with as long as B's demands are met. The B's care more about womanizing than being loved.
Are these the traits you see when you think of someone who is successful with women? If I am correct, let me know and I'll explain the rest of the story. | |
|
MarkCK
| Joined: 9/24/2005 Msg: 98 | |
| The infamous NICE GUY rant Posted: 8/24/2006 9:03:26 PM | you go, ho!
what about nice women?
nice guys can actually be good, caring guys, and not stupid about it, not all guys bitch about their ex's, or women they couldn't get, only lowlifes do that
anyway its stupid to judge a person on a their character like that its hardly reflecting, people are either good or bad, and spend their time doing positive, or negative!!! things
| |
|
| |
| The infamous NICE GUY rant Posted: 8/24/2006 9:44:51 PM | Ok, I have a few questions. I typically talk about my Ex. You all knwo I do. Anyway, my friends believe its because Im not over her. Well, a small part of me still yearns for her. But the pain was almost to excruciating, being torn from her, that I really dont know if I could go back. That, and she didnt remain loyal to me. {Sorry, cheaters are the lowest scum of all.} And I could not even get the girl I fell in love with back anyway. She has changed in the years we have been apart, and the girl I fell in love with is nothing more than a sweet dream in my minds eye. I have always been a "loner" in ways. I dont have many friends, but of the ones I do have, they are very very close to me. And amongst other men, I tend to keep quiet, and watch people go about their lives. I imagine this is one reason I do not get women to notice me. Im not ripping my****out, just to show that its longer { } and tend to get overlooked. Sorry, I only fight for things worth fighting for. Love, and protection. And throughout my life, these have been the only things I have ever thrown myself on the line for. Anyway, I speak about my Ex typically, because I have no other real basis for speaking of relationships. For example, a girl at my job and I tend to speak about love and such. I use my ex usually, and she, as my friends, say I am not over her. Which is false. Does this make me insecure? I will admit I worry a bit about my weight. But then again, I also love my size. Honestly! I read a post a while back, and it spoke about what attributes turned women on. And practically all of them have 3 things in common:
1.Tall 2.Broad Shouldered 3.Blue Eyes
Well hello ladies! Plus, strength is such a great and enjoyable high at times. When Im lugging these huge peices of whatever around, I feel such a high. Its like, wow, you are just...impressive. Now, does this mean I am truly insecure? Or am I just discomplacent about certain parts of my body?
And if I am insecure, is there counseling for it? Heh, asking this entire topic is probably insecure. Ok, everyone just forget you read it. {By the way, Ladyzoot.....KICKASS NAME!!! } | |
|
|
| Page 4 of 6
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
|