|
|
|
|
|
| Men in diapers
Posted: 8/19/2009 2:05:47 PM |
I'm not seeing that people are close-minded.
Are we reading the same thread????
Here, let me point out the parts I think are 'close minded':
We still chuckle about him wearing diapers from time to time.
Infatilism is a fetish, NOT a BDSM thing. Let's just clarify.
the simplest solution to men with that fetish would be a bullet to their head,put them out of their misery.
Oh for crying out loud. Put on your pants and knock off the crap.
Time to grow up!
I'm pretty open-minded but I think this one is selfish and I pity the women who cater to it. Think of how disgusting it must be for the woman to have to deal with, you're not a baby you're a grown man.
jerry springer show ripp off
Those guys seriously need psychological help. Such a thing just cannot be passed off as a harmless fetish for there are deep rooted issues that can negatively affect other people that they come across in their lives.
this has to be the sickest thing I've heard
That's pretty damn sick.
This is really odd., in a creepy kind of way is this the Jerry Springer show?
* How come there is no puke emoticon in here!!!!!!!
i think they're ****ed in the head
Didn't even know this fetish existed... GROSS!
OMG I'm LMFAO
thats just so wrong....omg I am laughing and so grossed out at the same time..thanks
The compunction for grown men to poop indiscriminately into their shorts for pleasure is not normal.
A real sicko for sure
Adults who wear diapers have got some serious issues... have developmental issues and a good percentage of them are probably into "scat play" as well.
You have issues because you wear diapers and you do it for fun
Again I ask, "What century is this?" And you wonder why I am so denfensive? Is it not obvious by those statemtents? If not, here let me make it easy to understand:
Each one of those is a different post, and all are attacks on my lifestyle choices. Not to mention the amount of ignorance spewing forth, it is like a foutain of filth!
Just for fairness let's look at 'nice' comments. Same deal as before, all from different posts.
If someone enjoys that, than that is fine by me.
Who is to to say which is better?
Yeah, what's the big deal?
This is a really intresting topic.
You're OK......just living outside the "BOX".
As you can see it has been a bit 'one-sided' in here. I thought I would even up the odds, I have a lot of information and fast fingers. (Could use a spellchecker now-and-then. But I have a valid excuse ;) ) | |
|
| Men in diapers
Posted: 8/19/2009 2:58:52 PM |
Well, that's from always working with those safety pins.
HA!
I don't like using saftey pins, might stab my finger, and who likes a little prick?
(That is what happens when one 'tries to hard' to be funny, I should just fall back on my looks for laughter.) | |
|
| Men in diapers
Posted: 8/27/2009 1:13:30 AM | We all have taboo or fantasies that can be considered a bit out there , what's the big deal really  | |
|
| Men in diapers
Posted: 9/11/2009 4:32:08 AM | most of your guys that have to be indiapers have been abused as children.Lets get one thing straight this is not a fetish.Most of these things happen because of the way the kids are treated as children.abused,molested sexually,punished by haveing to wear diapers/put back into them as kids for punishment.People need to understand the reasons behind this an all.Not be judgemental an be more open minded.people that wear diapers is no diffrent then anyone else.We all have feelings an like to express them an are open to everything.most people are judgemental an not open minded due to there defects in life an have a hard time dealing with change.People deal with things diffrently then others,lets not judge others by there covers see whas on the inside of that person.You might be passing a great person up an lose out on the future of undrstanding that person.thanks for taking time to read hope this helpped some.(Abs)  | |
|
| Men in diapers
Posted: 9/11/2009 4:57:13 AM | ha ha ha ha omg diapers? wow...........
 | |
|
| Men in diapers
Posted: 9/11/2009 6:29:56 AM | I applaud SPAGETT for stepping into the ring of fire here..
The original post asked for information and if anyone has this as a lifestyle as well as other opinions.
He stepped forward and dispite........a virtual stoning kept on..trying to give info...
Last year I met a man who asked me to "work" some issues thru with him with me as his mommy and him in diapers and as my baby...after many discussions we
went forward and I gave him what he had lacked initially as a baby...which was life affriming care and attention as well as nurturing.
At times it was complex..becuz humiliation /punishment came into it at times..sexual feelings arose and more but as we communicated and he PLANNED the scenerios he was then in control ..being a baby but an adult...and this made for a lot of healing,growth and change.I was happy he shared all this with me.
He continues to wear diapers for his own reasons...and it is his business..
He harms none by it and feels more at peace and a has a freedom ....not many understand.
T | |
|
| Men in diapers
Posted: 9/11/2009 1:13:09 PM | Thank you TantraD
And it only works as a stoning, if the stones are not ignorant comments based in prejudice.
And as you can see by the post right above yours, prejudice is still commonplace.
Just remember, I know why I am on a dating site (The diapers). They are on it because of their blind prejudice/ignorance/bigotry. | |
|
| Men in diapers
Posted: 9/11/2009 1:19:19 PM | I don't know how someone would get off on acting out childhood, but it's not associated with BDSM in any way, shape or form.
This is a lie, I have shown SEVERAL times that it is indeed related.
There is a whole submissive/dominate role-play going on with an Infantilist. To say that it is different, because there are diapers used as bondage instead of rope, well that is just silly.
Edit (To Add)
Here are two BDSM sites that list AB/DL information, just to solidify my position:
http://www.domsubfriends.com/cgi-local/wwwdir/db.cgi?db=res&uid=default&category=AGE/INFANTILISM+PLAY&view_records=View+Records
And
http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/dictionary/Infantilism/ | |
|
| Men in diapers
Posted: 9/11/2009 1:42:51 PM | It is NOT a Fetish, please do research before spouting unfounded claims.
As for you claim about it not being related to BDSM, you can have your opinion but that doesn't make it fact. BDSM and Infantilism ARE related.
Keep in mind INFANTILISM IS NOT A FETISH (I think people are having a hard time reading, of course with the ignorant comments big surprise.)
Keep saying it is a fetish, and I will bring out my big guns (Research, links, and other proof)
Remember readers, I posted 'proof' that it is related. The person I am responding to did not, bad debating tactics...
Edit (To Add:)
This entry is part of the BDSM Dictionary hosted by Informed Consent.
Infantilism (paraphilic) is a certain psychological condition experienced by those whose level of physical maturity has clearly progressed beyond the life-stage of infancy. The defining aspect of this condition is the derivation of a profound sense of well-being or of a certain type of great pleasure that becomes associated with various infantile objects and/ or infantile roleplaying .
Infantilists usually combine the submission of the baby role with the fetishes of diapers, though not all infantilists actually practice coprophilia or watersports. Some, known as diaper lovers (or DLs) enjoy wearing diapers without taking the role of an infant. Those who prefer to role play as infants are often referred to as adult babies (or ABs). Some forms of infantilism are purely regressive, without any sexual contact, however most forms include some aspect of sexuality. Where dominance and submission are involved, the top or dominant plays the role of a parent, nursemaid, or babysitter.
http://www.informedconsent.co.uk/dictionary/Infantilism/
In contrast, infantilism focuses on the self. Paraphilic infantilism involves the desire to wear diapers as an expression of role. This roleplay may involve acting like and/or being treated as an infant, toddler, or small child. Infantilists are, in one sense, masochistic: Assuming the role of baby inherently involves surrendering control and status. While some translation is involved, the interests of infantilists expressed in concepts familiar to BDSM enthusiasts. However, these interests often don't include typical masochistic elements such as adult themed restraints. etc.
http://understanding.infantilism.org/what_is_infantilism.php
As you can see, I have shown even more proof that they are related. I have plenty more under my bib. | |
|
| Men in diapers
Posted: 9/11/2009 2:03:58 PM |
Infantilism is a specific genre of fetish play, period.
THIS is a BLATANT LIE.
And I thought babies were the ones that could not read.
HA not proof?? Did you even click the links provided? They were done by medical professionals in one instance. Guess your OPINION is better than their FACT.
You sir are wrong, and until you show proof otherwise, you are spouting lies as facts.
I am not going to post more 'proof' for you, for it is apparent you have a closed mind. Which is funny, considering you are not a "normie"
Again I ask, remember when men who wore womens clothing were 'gay' by proxy?
Now I ask, Men who wear diapers are 'Fetish' by proxy.
Do some research, before making unfounded claims. Unfounded claims just make one look like, well, a stupid baby. And that is my job, apparently. | |
|
| Men in diapers
Posted: 9/11/2009 2:09:22 PM | Actually it’s called Abnormal Psychology. We can call it a fetish, add it to the rest of the things we call “a fetish” whatever group we want to place it in. To cover up the real fact that this is abnormal behavior! The brain: which is trained to respond to stimulation be it sexy lingerie, stockings, high heels, whatever the fetish may be, has a large part of what we allow and do not allow to be done. To degrade oneself by making diapers now a fantasy to stimulate pleasure, is far beyond acceptable.
I need diapers and a woman taking care of me as the above mentioned post has said? Truly a sad state of mind, far from reality and normality! Do not make the mistake of categorizing them with having a fetish! This is beyond what is normal. Whatever we do, don’t let these people work in the health care profession; especially old age homes were in fact we do have some patients wearing Depends. This is not even a funny post or an amusing one. It is a sad reality of what this world is coming to.
Call me harsh and judgmental but I am willing to stand alone if need be on this one.
Abnormal …is all I can say while shaking my head!
Wild | |
|
| Men in diapers
Posted: 9/11/2009 2:23:40 PM | Wild DNA: I will accept your claim, when you can define what is "normal".
And I am in a sad state of mind? Please explain why you have the need to insult me? And how you are able to read my 'sad mind'?
Whatever we do, don’t let these people work in the health care profession; especially old age homes were in fact we do have some patients wearing Depends. This is not even a funny post or an amusing one. It is a sad reality of what this world is coming to.
OH MY GOD!??! Are you actually suggesting that I would do something to the elderly? Where do you get your bigotry??
And I will take you up on your offer: "You are harsh, and judgemental."
And how is the view from up on your hill? Do you still oppress the Gays and African Americans? Or are they allowed to become part of 'normal'?
EDIT (To Add:)
To further prove that INFANTILISM IS RELATED TO BDSM:
Bondage (B in BDSM)
Bondage can be divided into six main categories:
* Bondage that pulls parts of the body together (rope, straps, harnesses).
(A "snuggie" that is lockable will restrain just as well as a "harness", oh wait they have something called a "baby harness".)
* Bondage that spreads parts of the body apart (spreader bars, x-frames).
(A thick diaper will spread apart the legs.)
* Bondage that ties the body down to another object (such as chairs or stocks).
(A "Walker" or "high-chair" or "play-pen")
* Bondage that suspends the body from another object (suspension bondage).
(Yes they have those seats that can hang in doorways for adults too! Oh and regular kiddy swings.)
* Bondage that restricts normal movement (hobble skirts, handcuffs, pony harness).
(Diapers, Footed Pajamas, Onsies, etc.)
* Bondage that wraps the whole body or a part of it in bindings such as cloth or plastic (saran wrap or cling film "mummification") as well as sleepsack bondage.
(Footed sleepers, and "Snuggies" both of which come with "locking versions")
There are also some common fantasy settings in which bondage is often played:
* Rape, ravishment and/or abduction: The top fictitiously seizes or abducts the consenting bottom and has complete control to do what he/she pleases.
* Dominance/slavery: A training session occurs in which rewards for obedience and punishment for defiance are given. Humiliation is usually involved.
(Like a Mommy (Dominate) and a baby (Submissive) Or do kids ALWAYS obey their parents?)
* Predicament bondage: The bottom is given a choice between two tortures. For example, caning on the rear or flogging on the chest. If the bottom cannot stand one any longer, the top will start the other. This can also be done mechanically, like having a bottom squat and rigging a crotch rope to tighten if they attempt to stand.
Dominance(D in BDSM)
This part should be self explaintory: "Mommy" = Dominate AND "Baby" = Submissive
Sadism(S in BDSM) and Masochism (M in BDSM)
Sadism refers to gratification in the infliction of pain or humiliation upon another person. Masochism refers to gratification from receiving the same.
Alright, let me put it this way to remove ALL confusion:
Sadism refers to gratification in inflicting humiliation of another person. Do you not think it is humiliating to wear diapers in public? Do you not think that people are not forced to do such things by their Doms/Mommies?
Masochism is the gratification in reciving Sadism. So are you saying that the Subs/Babies do not enjoy this treatment? If they don't then why continue? Are the crickets chirpping yet?
Still want to say it is not related to BDSM?
Sources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BDSM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sadomasochism | |
|
| Men in diapers
Posted: 9/11/2009 2:36:50 PM | but it is clearly not accepted as part of BDSM
Yes it is!...check collarme.com..alt.com..fetlife
.there are many WOMEN and MEN on there looking for babies and otehrs who are AB...The friend I spoke of in a previous post is on 2 BDSM sites and has found compatible friends there..and acceptance...
I am a natural DOMINANT and would never look at men in diapers as something associated with BDSM
I...I.....I...........
Natural DOMS are rare and those who say they are are usually laughed at in the BDSM world.....men who laugh at other's kinks are common though..
not anything I'd classify........
of course not..this is your opinion YOU ARE MISTAKING IT FOR FACT
T | |
|
| Men in diapers
Posted: 9/11/2009 2:49:23 PM | Spagett
A. I was not addressing YOU I was addressing the original post, posted by Ghostwind.
B. I have not read one thing you have said nor what anyone else has said, my comments are not directed to anyone in here but again … to the original post!
C. That being said. Go study for yourself what is abnormal and what is not. You may be the judge of where you fit in.
D. They are called sexual dysfunction for a reason.
E. To answer your question of what is normal? There is a report done each year according to the NHSLS study.
F. Types of sexual dysfunctions are noted as such.
Sexual desire disorders.
Sexual arousal disorders
Orgasm disorders
Sexual pain disorders.
Feel free to take your pick as to where you stand or wish to stand in your mind, life and reality. And call yourself whatever you wish to be called.
Or
You can take four years of schooling for Abnormal Psychology and find out for yourself!
Up to you.
May I add:
I am not addressing gays or any other mentioned behaviors you are mentioning here. I am addressing the point of men wearing diapers and getting sexually aroused by a woman taking care of them. To the point of becoming sexually satisfied. That was the original topic of discussion and I have no intentions of venturing off track. My opinion is still entitled here along with yours.
READ carefully before your imagination runs wild! I did not call you a sad state of mind. Unless you get off in diapers and women changing them for you.
Is there anything else you want to proclaim to the world?
Feel free. You have the floor!
| |
|
| Men in diapers
Posted: 9/11/2009 3:28:01 PM |
F. Types of sexual dysfunctions are noted as such.
Sexual desire disorders.
Sexual arousal disorders
Orgasm disorders
Sexual pain disorders.
And I have said TIME AND AGAIN:
INFANTILISM IS NOT A FETISH
And, in many cases, Infantilism has NOTHING to do with SEX.
So how can you label it as a "Sexual Dysfunction"? Or is that just the "armchair therapist" talking?
Furthermore, the insinuation you made about Infantilists and The Elderly was very much directed at me/my lifestyle. Of course I notice you did not elaborate more on that point...
Again NO SEXUAL FEELINGS in MANY MANY CASES
That is what is called a "Diaper Lover" or DL, and THAT is fetish. An AB "Adult Baby" or Infantilist, HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH FETISH OR SEX. (Unless they are both AB and DL and then it is just the DL doing the sex.)
Research is your friend, and the floor is yours.
EDIT (To Add:)
Also:
I am not addressing gays or any other mentioned behaviors you are mentioning here.
I was showing how your statements were formed in prejudice/bigotry. See how the labels are interchangeable (Infantilist for Gay, or Infantilist for African American)
Furthermore, responding to a 2008 post *edit*From a user no longer here*/edit*. And responding to someone that had a lack of information on the subject. Then someone comes in (me) with an in-depth understanding, and you admit to ignoring the facts presented. Great debating!
Edit2 (To Fix spelling/date) | |
|
| Men in diapers
Posted: 9/11/2009 3:32:22 PM | I dont care what other people do
Why do you keep coming back to make a point about diapers then?
natural doms don't need leather..props ,toys..
what's the point of gags..?...all of that is a joke...they are more comfortable playing a role than who they are naturally
People who profess they are a natural DOM are entitled to their feelings..
and opinion but in saying that they are AND saying as you do ...that there are 'fakes"
then you say YOUR WAY IS THE ONLY WAY...
NOT!
Just as your opinion of BDSM/domming differs..so does everyones...it is A FEELING..
Leather..props..toys are part of what turn some people on and what they use to increase pealsure and build a realtionship of fun and excitement.
Just becuz you dont see it as neccessary does not make IT A JOKE.
Are high heels a joke...lingerae?short skirts?red lipstick? anything another may see as a turn on..or part of what they like?
RE:ROLES...
yes..some people role play..it is a form of play between two people..NOT for people
who are not comfortable being them..wtf?
RE: GAGS..
the" point" is FOR SOME PEOPLE...it increases a sense of submission..eroticism..
etc...it is an addition to their playing.
If you cannot see the point of a simple addition of an item that someone may PREFER..wow
I understand you are talking about your natural ability to LEAD..take control..
many can..
however...narrow mindedness and inability to see the ways of others are simply THEIR way is not a good quality for leadership.
There is also a difference between domineering and domming.
I did not want to de-rail .........SO....... back to the DIAPER QUESTION:
We all have experiences...we all have feelings..
FROM PERSONAL EXPERIENCE comes personal response...
as indicated on here...
If a thread such as this could be taken as an indicater/symbol/metaphor of tolerance and understanding in society.
.....well ..........
T | |
|
| Men in diapers
Posted: 9/11/2009 3:44:09 PM | lol@the floor is yours. Ok...
Spagett......You are on another debate, totally off topic to this one.
If you want to give your opinion in this thread than do it according to the question asked from the OP. NOT from how far it has gone off-track. Stays focused and stop copying what online dictionary says. Speak your own mind and in your own words.
This is your chance to say what you have been trying to say. Forget the BDSM talk for a moment we are talking about MEN IN DIAPERS GETTING SEXUALLY ARROUSED BY THAT!
So... to put the question directly to YOU!!!!... Do you or do you not see men wearing diapers, then getting off to a woman changing them and everything else that was mentioned in the original post!
Do you or do you not think that this is an abnormal behavior?????
Last chance to get it right lol | |
|
| Men in diapers
Posted: 9/11/2009 3:51:03 PM | If you want to give your opinion in this thread than do it according to the question asked from the OP.
OP TOPIC ALERT!!
So are any of you crazy kids out there into this stuff? If so, please enlighten the masses and tell us what you get out of this? How does infantileism turn a man or a woman on.. Whether you be the baby or the care giver???? Enquiring minds wanna know..
Crazy kid, into this stuff? Check.
Enlighten the masses, tell us what you get? Check...In progress
How does it turn on man/woman? It doesn't if we are talking about infantilism (Check.)
Alright, I have shown that ALL OF MY POSTS are on topic.
I am an infantilist, I have been explaining what infantilism IS. You have not been reading, and supplying the thread with FALSE Information.
As you can see, I had 'it right' from my first post. Which you ADMITTED to NOT READING.
Edit (To Add:)
So... to put the question directly to YOU!!!!... Do you or do you not see men wearing diapers, then getting off to a woman changing them and everything else that was mentioned in the original post!
You have no idea what Infantilism is, please do some research first then re-post your question.
Do you or do you not think that this is an abnormal behavior?????
I have yet to see a definition of "normal" that EVERYONE fits, or even the MAJORITY. I know something that is morally wrong though, insulting anothers lifestyle. Don't feel bad though, I understand. I remember when men were "gay" for wearing dresses. (Transvestites). They are gaining ground to the "normies" though.
Normies: People who spout "That is abnormal" or "You are not normal". | |
|
| Men in diapers
Posted: 9/11/2009 3:55:20 PM | | Im into many non-vanilla "fetishes" or whatever you might call them.Infantilism isnt one.But to say its abnormal,or stupid.....well many would say that about homo/bi-sexuality,anal sex,using toys,etc etc.To each their own,i say,as long as its between consenting adults. | |
|
| Men in diapers
Posted: 9/11/2009 5:15:10 PM | Addressed to Spegett, and the last time I do so I might add
You don't answer my questions even if I spell them out to you in black and white. Stop skirting around what I am asking.
Diapers, men sexually getting off, with them on them… what part of MY discussion do you NOT understand? Or is it that you do not like what I am saying when I say it is abnormal behavior? Are you saying this is “normal behavior?” because to disagree with me is to claim that men wearing diapers as OP posted is normal? According to you… because that’s what it sounds like to me.
Normal VS Abnormal, are you trying to say that all psychology is wrong and you are right? Are you trying to say there is no such thing as abnormal sexual dysfunctions? That every sexual desire is normal no matter what and how far that desire is taken to? Every level is acceptable so they can fit into society and god forbid least we offend any, reject any, or other????? Are you trying to say that the rest of us are just off the wall because we don’t approve, and don’t accept it?
There is only one side of the fence to stand on here and I can see clearly that you and I will never see eye to eye on this issue at hand. Men wearing diapers and getting off by that… IS ABNORMAL!
End of discussion! | |
|
| Men in diapers
Posted: 9/11/2009 5:35:50 PM | OMG Men in diapers....
I am a very open minded individual, but sorry that is just to much!!! | |
|
| Men in diapers
Posted: 9/11/2009 5:44:59 PM | You don't answer my questions even if I spell them out to you in black and white. Stop skirting around what I am asking.
Diapers, men sexually getting off, with them on them…
If you knew anything about infantilism, you would know that we don't sexually get off with diapers. So your question is based on false pretences. Is that too hard to understand?
As for the normal, how much plainer can I say THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS NORMAL. Sooooo, by proxy, I think EVERYTHING is NOT NORMAL.
Normal VS Abnormal, are you trying to say that all psychology is wrong and you are right?
How dare you call me abnormal, oh wait it doesn't exist. And show me some proof that psychology says that it is abnormal. Like I stated earlier, never had a therapist say that being an infantilist was "abnormal" or "wrong". So are you saying you are right and the psychologists are wrong? I will post proof that it is not abnormal, but you must post proof on your claim first. Outstanding claims require outstanding evidence..
Are you trying to say that the rest of us are just off the wall because we don’t approve, and don’t accept it?
I am saying, implying that I would do something sexually to the elderly is "off the wall" and "ignorant". Notice how you keep forgetting to elaborate that point...
There is only one side of the fence to stand on here and I can see clearly that you and I will never see eye to eye on this issue at hand. Men wearing diapers and getting off by that… IS ABNORMAL!
And that is just your OPINION. I, on the other hand, have the FACTS.
End of discussion
EDIT (To Add:)
A previous post of mine that applies now, figured it was not the OP so it wasn't read:
Well this is a difficult question to answer, I will answer it how my life turned out. I do not know if this is average for infantilists, but I have talked to a few others who had similar circumstances:
My 'lifestyle' started at (or around) the ripe old age of 3. I remember beaing spanked (father again) for wearing diapers. We still had 'left-overs' due to I was in potty training. My memory of childhood is not strong at all, so that is a story from mom/dad.
After that school began, and I remember a couple instances of stealing diapers from the 'pre-school' area. This was around 2nd/3rd grade, this is also when the 'therapy' started.
Long story short, I have never been to a therapist that said "Infantilism is a mental disorder". It best can be described as a lack of development in a humans neural network. So, while my brain fires properly. I do not have the 'average' pathways when it comes to certain aspects of my life, which is the same for every person on the planet. (Hence why there is no 'normal'.)
So there you have it, I have been to therapists (In all fairness, not since I was a freshman in HS.) None ever said the nasty comments I have seen in here, nor did they compare them to those comments. (Hence my comments on ignorance.)
Lastly, thank you so much for a 'real' question/comment! You have no idea how much that was welcomed, against the tide of bigotry.
(Heh, guess the bigotry is still going strong!) | |
|
| Men in diapers
Posted: 9/11/2009 5:52:07 PM | | Just sayin on "fetish" type sites,women are into that too.LOL not just dudes want to be in a crib and given pacifiers/or whatever to suck on ; ) / | |
|
| Men in diapers
Posted: 9/12/2009 5:57:52 PM | Just sayin on "fetish" type sites,women are into that too.LOL not just dudes want to be in a crib and given pacifiers/or whatever to suck on ; ) /
This is an EXCELLENT point! If a thread were to pop up regarding "Girls in diapers" I bet the bigotry would be missing, for the most part. Some people are just too close minded to accept anything further than their pore-clogged noses. Also, girls have that 'cuteness' going for them in the "minds-eye". So when your brain pictures a girl wearing a diaper, it isn't the same as the brain picturing a guy wearing one. If I were to guess, just by the reactions in here:
Girl in diaper: Someone famous, very attractive in a 'cute' kind of way. (Drew Barrymore, Cameron Diaz)
Guy in diaper: Someone fictitious, horribly fat and/or ugly in a 'RUN' kind of way. (Dick Cheney, President Taft, Joseph Merric)
That is the trouble with not having control of one's thoughts. They will take control of you, and more often than not, not in a 'good' way. All I ask is that one tries to be respectful in their disagreements. And, forgiveness is easy when the comments are made out of ignorance, so "It's okay" in advance. (This is to all upcoming posts by everyone)
Take the majority of the posters to this thread. Instead of trying to learn about something, before making an assessment. They pre-judge an entire group of humans as "sick" "gross" "nasty" and a plethora of other insults. THEN one of those humans comes forward, to offer genuine information, and instead of listening, they stick to those tired prejudice comments.
I am willing to bet money that many of them still think that I deficate/uriniate myself. And those that don't either consider this a fetish still, or that I am 'mentally-ill'. And instead of making sure, by reading. They just assume, which brings me to this: "If you continually do something you know to be wrong, over and over again, that is a sign of insanity."
Just remember, I am not a fat, ugly, creepy little man who is the definition of mentally-ill. I do not smell like pee, or poop, and I know how to flush a toliet (and put the lid down). The only difference between me, and what people think is "normal" is that my underwear choices are different, and I still like pretending. I do not 'talk to myself' or 'walk in circles', I do not do anything that would require me to be put under the term of "crazy" or "insane", unless you count being on a dating site. According to the numbers it isn't something "normal" people do! Lastly, I am more than some letters in a thread on some website. I am a human, the same kind as all the other ones on the planet. I think I deserve better treatment than a post in a thread on some website. (Appeal to emotion, sorry take it or leave it.)
My offer still stands, I have all the information needed for one to make an "informed decision" about the OP's question(s). And, if one doesn't need the info to make the decision, take it anyways. That way you can learn how to dislike something, without insulting other people. Remember, the world revolves around itself; we are just along for the ride.
EDIT (For clarification:)
This post is for the thread as a whole, not as a response to the post above it... | |
|
| Men in diapers
Posted: 9/12/2009 11:39:04 PM | | yup thats right.Not my thing but most of "my things" would freak average ppl out(i guess) so to each their own.Hell maybe Thomas Jefferson wore diapers LOL.And if you read about the true life of the great Benjamin Franklin he was a total freak and swinger!Its america,so as long as its between consenting adults stick ur judgement up your ass!(not that we cant poke fun at each other) | |
|
|
| Page 5 of 7
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
|
Home
login 
