| anatomy/physiology - not sure how to catagorize this topic ?!?
Posted: 5/16/2008 8:33:19 AM | From a male perspective.....he is looking for an excuse .
She is hurt (because she is emotionally involved) and he is looking for an out (one that cannot be corrected) ...thus, it is not his fault we have to break up.
Dump him.....just a sign of the future.... make believe problems. | |
|
| anatomy/physiology - not sure how to catagorize this topic ?!?
Posted: 5/16/2008 8:45:20 AM | I taught Anatomy in college... So I think I might be able to answer this one :)
Humans are the only mammals that do not have a baculum or 'penis' bone. In the animal kingdom it is like a lock and key mechanism to ensure female orgasm to carry the sperm up the vaginal cavity.
I'm not sure why our make and model came without one of these bones cause I know many women that would appreciate an orgasm everytime!
as far as 'not' fitting together... I've seen some pretty 'odd' couples... you know the kind where you see them and think... hmmm 'I wonder how that works?'
Where there's a will there's a way. he says her thighs are to large? try a different position. Her hips too narrow maybe? try from the side (her legs draped over his waist, her on her back him on his side)
I'm assuming that his lack of effort is probably due to another deeper underlying issue.
-S | |
|
| anatomy/physiology - not sure how to catagorize this topic ?!?
Posted: 5/16/2008 8:58:51 AM | Of course they're be able to "fit together" if he wants them to. I don't know about him but I wouldn't be a woman's boyfriend if I didn't think we were sexuall compatable. I'm average framed and I've dated and had sex with both smaller women and larger women. I've found the type that fits the best are the average sized ones. That's just my personal preference, though. I've known a couple of guys who actually preferred very large women for some reason. I dated and had sex with one woman who was around 5'4" and 350 lbs. It was pretty bad, though, and not very satisfying.
Ed | |
|
| |
| |
| anatomy/physiology - not sure how to catagorize this topic ?!?
Posted: 5/16/2008 5:12:14 PM |
: I taught Anatomy in college... So I think I might be able to answer this one :)
Humans are the only mammals that do not have a baculum or 'penis' bone. In the animal kingdom it is like a lock and key mechanism to ensure female orgasm to carry the sperm up the vaginal cavity.
I'm not sure why our make and model came without one of these bones cause I know many women that would appreciate an orgasm everytime!
The Penis Bone - Erection without blood
By: Stefan Anitei, Science Editor
Most mammals have a unique bone called baculum (also penis bone, penile bone or os penis) in their penis. The only mammal species without baculum are the humans, horses, donkeys, rhinoceros, marsupials, rabbits, cetaceans (whales and dolphins), elephants and hyenas.
But baculum is present in most primates, rodents, carnivores, seals. The penis bone is kept in the abdomen and, when needed, a set of muscles push it into a sheath in the fleshy part of the penis.
...........................................................
The baculum is for speed: sliding a bone in and out of a sheath is much faster than waiting for the hydraulics to kick in and limits the time spent mating, which is, after all, in a vulnerable position.
Indeed, mammals without a baculum have in change larger erectile penises and they perform much longer during copulation! ....
The baculum explains lion's sexual marathon of roughly 250 copulations in 4 days, even if each copulation lasts 30-70 seconds ....Because, in this case, erection depends more on a willingly moved muscle and not in tissue turgescence.
^^^^^ So no foreplay and a quickie so quick that if you blink you miss it ensures female orgasm....... And you taught that crap at the college level  | |
|
| anatomy/physiology - not sure how to catagorize this topic ?!?
Posted: 5/17/2008 2:46:58 AM |
heres the problem - he is used to dating women who are small framed - the model type body build. My best friend is very tall and has a big bone frame, and larger build then he is used to dating.
Yes, it's possible - I'm used to women with athletic builds and I find it very awkward to have sex with women who as you put it, have a `` big bone frame.'' The closest description I can think of at the moment is that it's like swimming in molassas. Tall isn't the problem. ``Big'' is. I don't know what to tell you, other than being thinner and more lithe would help. | |
|
| |
| anatomy/physiology - not sure how to catagorize this topic ?!?
Posted: 5/17/2008 11:59:38 AM | I have made love to many different shapes and sizes, etc.
There has yet to be a fat girl--and that is what we are talking about here--that I could not ****!
As another poster put it: where theres a will theres a way.
(The issue might be the nly way the guy knows to try to break up with a fat girl. Have you considered that?) | |
|
| |
| anatomy/physiology - not sure how to catagorize this topic ?!?
Posted: 5/17/2008 3:21:28 PM | Take it from me, tell her to get out.
I was with a guy that said a lot of things (we even got engaged)
he would never tell me what he liked sexually he just said it would be easier if i was lighter :O
He used to tell me about the great sex with his ex's (models) that were thin.
He liked it his way and wouldnt try anything i liked.
And then after we got engaged a few months he said the ultimate which lead to me breaking up with him, he told me to go to the gym because he prefered 'thinner' women, he wasn't trying to hurt me he said he just had preferences.
I realised he would never accept me how i was and that he would make me hate myself when i love myself, im a curvy girl and proud.
They are not worth it | |
|
Home
login 
