|
|
|
|
|
| He is sick, she left him... Posted: 5/20/2008 10:30:24 AM | Interesting post ,,,,,,,,,
My ex-mother-in-law ,, found herself in a similar situation . She did stay with her hub , though he had had a a brain malfunction , and she looked after him and their 5 children . She also decided she need to satisfy her needs , so she found a friend . She was open about her situation to the family and expected them to accept the situation . She satisfied her needs, looked after her husband , and raised the children . Sounds like the ideal solution ? Well she raised 5 very screwed up children thanks to her selfishness to have her "needs" fulfilled.To this day , none of those children have found fulfilling lives , and the reflection of her actions are very obvious in each of them. (all adults now ) Seems like similar situations here,, where both women decided their "needs " were of a greater priority than the people around them . Seems also to be a reflection of today's society , where "me " comes first ,, and to hell with the rest . Bit sad I think . Oh , and just in case it's of interest ..my ex-father-in-law was not greatly incapacitated , in that he still led quite a normal life , held a job , and lived quite well.. his mind just slipped a bit from time to time . See, you may do all the right things , look after the incapcitated partner , make sure the kids get their education , etc etc ,, but little minds watch and listen , and the effect on them is huge . I think both ladies could have had their "needs" fulfilled discreetly . Which would have been a far wiser move for everybody involved. Life is tough sometimes , and sometimes we are dealt the hard road . A little bit of forethought goes a long way . And a little bit of consideration for others involved . | |
|
| He is sick, she left him... Posted: 5/20/2008 10:32:30 AM | Shad... You got that right. I work in assisted living, and no way would I ever be able to afford to live there later on in life, and our social services cover none of it.
I took care of my mom too, and would do it again in a heartbeat if she were here. I never say anything to them, but did wonder where my other 6 brothers and sisters were when my mom needed care. They seemed to disappear. It is sad, but they also have to live with themselves. JMO | |
|
| He is sick, she left him... Posted: 5/20/2008 11:49:01 AM | | THIS HAPPENED TO ME! I had a serious adverse reaction to a sleep medication that I was on. It took me 10 months to wean off of it and then awhile longer to recover from the effects. My ex dumped me 2 days before christmas and moved her boyfriend into my home that I had built for us within 3 weeks! She flat out says that withdrawal from the sleep medication WASNT working for her! She met the guy during the 10 months of weaning. She even told the attorney's and the mediator that I was a great father, person and husband but that she did not want to wait around for me to get through the adverse reaction. (head aches, insomnia, feeling like the flu). We have 2 kids that are 10 and 11. The 10 year old went from a gifted program in school to not sure if he will pass 4th grade now. I could go on and on about how selfish she is BUT I was the person that married her.....choices...choices..choices...UGH!! | |
|
| He is sick, she left him... Posted: 5/21/2008 4:35:05 AM |
No one can judge her on this one. She must live with any decision she makes, for only she knows everything involved in making the decision. I can empathize...I take care of my mom, who's in ailing health. She lives with me, so I am familiar with how dating decisions are impacted.
Yet everyone has judged her. Some have judged her act as selfish and an affront to the vows she made him to get a ring and others have judged she deserves pity.
Then some have judged the judges and don't like losing their appeals to refrain from judging her act.
When making vows to marry someone, one is supposed to understand that there will be no justifications for not honoring them.
Seems to me when agreeing not to make judgments, one is simply capitulating for the sake of avoiding the ramifications of making judgments someone doesn't like. Like being judged as the leader of a lynch mob. | |
|
| He is sick, she left him... Posted: 5/21/2008 5:20:03 AM | | Why do you not understand how one could judge your friend for this? It is a moral imperative to judge others by their actions. We do this all the time. You make judgments about people all the time based on less significant information. Your friend abandoned a man she allegedly loved because he was ill. She is disloyal. It is that simple. Any man knows he would be abandoned just like her husband. Her actions had consequences and now you think she deserves our sympathy? I cannot sympathize with abandoning a loved one because he is ill. | |
|
| When the going gets tough, the tough get going... Posted: 5/21/2008 5:39:10 AM |
yes, well walk a mile in someone elses shoes, then decide.... it is all about choices, not really about emotions at all. Nobody really knows their limits until they actually come face to face with them.
According to your logic, we could have no moral values at all unless we personally have lived through every possible moral crisis. That is nonsense and is the typical excuse thrown out by those who are trying to excuse those who have committed immoral acts. I do not need to murder someone to know that murder is immoral. Likewise I do not need to abandon a spouse to know this is immoral. If your friend abandoned her children because she could not get dates and just couldn't take it, should we all just say that since we haven't faced that situation personally it is moral for her to abandon her children? Life is full of hard choices. The choices we make define our character. Your friend defined her character very clearly. Your admiration for her action defines your character just as clearly.
What do you and your friend think the marriage vows "in sickness and in health" and "'until death do us part" mean? If they can be discarded at will, they are hardly vows. If they do not matter, then why take them?
We all do really know what we would do in such situations. We may lie about what we would do to others, but we each know our own values and what we would give to maintain them. One's spouse is one's highest value. If one would abandon one's spouse, one would abandon any and all of one's values. | |
|
| He is sick, she left him... Posted: 5/21/2008 5:57:37 AM |
Your friend has to do what she needs to do. We humans are not infallible.
So, because we are not infallible we are not to be held accountable for our actions? If I punch you in the face because I just did what I needed to do, I should suffer no consequence for that? If fallibilty absolves one of responsibility, then we cannot punish criminals and should just shut down our judicial system.
No one knows what will happen until they are faced with this situation.
So, you don't judge Nazis for killing Jews because you have not faced their situation? Of course you judge them! The fundamental dishonesty of your argumentation is very disturbing. | |
|
| When the going gets tough, the tough get going... Posted: 5/21/2008 6:44:33 AM | Marriage commitments are somewhat meaningless. In the end, people do what they do because of reasons other than the superficial "for better or for worse" ceremonial platitudes.
There's nothing wrong with that except that marriage "vows" seem to create a lot of false expectations that lead to pain and confusion and misery when they conflict with the direction one or both want to take later in life or the unforseeable circumstances that arise.
In reality, any marriage is a day-to-day thing. So is life itself. I don't think anyone can be expected to sacrifice a huge portion of their life to circumstances that they did not truly foresee at the time of marriage. If they in fact choose to do so then that is an incredible act on their part but those who do not should not be judged or beat themselves up.
It's not as necessary to always judge others as some folks seem to think. It's a pointless, unnecessary and fallacious pursuit in most day-to day social circumstances. If people spent more time judging themselves, and acting upon that, rather than judging others then maybe things would really change for the better.
It's probably better to avoid making marriage commitments in the first place and accept that a relationship is really about each moment together and the law of attraction rather than the law of contract.
In the end, we are each responsible for our own happiness, no matter what curve balls life may throw at us. | |
|
| He is sick, she left him... Posted: 5/21/2008 7:22:08 AM |
When making vows to marry someone, one is supposed to understand that there will be no justifications for not honoring them.
Really?? So hypothetically if, 20 years into the marriage, a spouse was exposed as a pedophile serial killer there would be no justification for "not honoring" marriage vows ?
I guess by your argument that you support women staying in the marriage when they are getting beaten too?
A good argument is one that doesn't crumble instantly when applied to various hypothetical circumstances. Generally it's fairly difficult to come up with a good argument for controlling and/or judging other people's lives. | |
|
| He is sick, she left him... Posted: 5/21/2008 8:27:49 AM |
Really?? So hypothetically if, 20 years into the marriage, a spouse was exposed as a pedophile serial killer there would be no justification for "not honoring" marriage vows ?
I guess by your argument that you support women staying in the marriage when they are getting beaten too?
That pedophile serial killer and wife beater has already broken the vows and divorce should be eminent.
To marry knowing a person has such behaviors would be just plain stupid. Same as getting involved with someone that has a history of cheating on an ill spouse.
Got any more dumb hypotheticals? | |
|
| He is sick, she left him... Posted: 5/21/2008 9:43:04 AM | MINISTER TO GROOM:
Do you GROOM'S NAME take BRIDE'S NAME to be your wife – to live together after God’s ordinance – in the holy estate of matrimony? Will you love her, comfort her, honor and keep her, in sickness and in health, for richer, for poorer, for better, for worse, in sadness and in joy, to cherish and continually bestow upon her your heart’s deepest devotion, forsaking all others, keep yourself only unto her as long as you both shall live?
GROOM:
I will. Except if she get's fat, can't keep up with me when we go hiking, I find the waitress is more appealing, she spends too much money, dosen't like my toys, football games and drinking too much.
MINISTER TO BRIDE:
Do you BRIDE'S NAME) take GROOM'S NAME to be your husband – to live together after God’s ordinance – in the holy estate of matrimony? Will you love him, comfort him, honor and keep him, in sickness and in health, for richer, for poorer, for better, for worse, in sadness and in joy, to cherish and continually bestow upon him your heart’s deepest devotion, forsaking all others, keep yourself only unto him as long as you both shall live?
BRIDE:
I will. Except if he loses his job, looks at other women at the restaurant, doesn't provide sex on demand, gets too fat, goes bald, my friends laugh at him and he doesn't live up to my emotional standards.
 | |
|
| He is sick, she left him... Posted: 5/21/2008 10:01:05 AM |
Got any more dumb hypotheticals? Nope....We're STILL waiting for you to comment on my question about your hypocracy. Did you, or did you NOT state in Message # 5 in the thread "The Selfish Factor"
Ann Rand had an interesting point of view on pure selfishness that I share, that one wants to feel as good as they can but most choose the wrong things to define their selfishness. For those of you unfamiliar with the Objectivist Philosophy, this is AYN Rand's (not ANN) theory which the lynch mob leader agrees with.
Ayn Rand rejects altruism, the view that self-sacrifice is the moral ideal. She argues that the ultimate moral value, for each human individual, is his or her own well-being. Since selfishness (as she understands it) is serious, rational, principled concern with one's own well-being, it turns out to be a prerequisite for the attainment of the ultimate moral value. For this reason, Rand believes that selfishness is a virtue. So WHICH is it Mac? Do you or do you NOT agree with selfishness? Have you lied??? Which of your lies are we to believe????
Let's pretend for 1 moment that the person in question has NO desire for a relationship with another man. Let's say.....she's just exhausted. She's 20 years older than when she began, and she's simply worn out. With the "debililtating" nature of his illness, he requires more and more care daily.....with rising prices, she must work more and more hours to make ends meet....and there simply are not enough hours in a day for her to meet ALL the obligations that she is expected to meet. It's been disclosed that there is NO help from any other family members...so her alternative is to hire "adult babysitters"....to the tune of $14 per hour. She only makes $15 an hour, add travel time to and from her job...let's not forget that she needs at least an hour a week in addition to stop off at the grocery store....I'd frankly like to know how she's managed to fit cheating into that hectic schedule? If she simply said....there are not enough hours in the day for me to do ALL that is required...I need HELP.....then why are we condemning her? Ohhhh, I know....it's because she failed to also fit a college education into the schedule so that she could earn $40 an hour so that she could handle all of her obligations?
My problem with your judgements are that you are criticizing someone for not being able to do what you yourselves couldn't do....yet you have the audacity and the small mindedness to criticize someone else. I strongly suspect that if she were to fall over dead from the burden that you'd all be pissing on her corpse and cussing her for being selfish for dieing knowing that she was needed in order for someone else to survive.
Once again MacK......WHICH one of your lies are we to believe? | |
|
| He is sick, she left him... Posted: 5/21/2008 10:02:07 AM | LOL @ Mac
However not everyone knows they are marrying a pedophile. My very best friend, after 18 yrs of marriage, found out her husband had molested his step-daughter from his previous marriage when he got arrested visiting their old home town.
Marriage vows or no, I would have kicked this man to the curb, as in my heart there is no more heinous crime than harming a child. She however felt compelled by her marriage vows to stay in the marriage. Believe me, I argued with her, but I saw the pain she was in, and could only do what a friend should do - support her in the end.
There is no way you can ever know what went on in your spouse's life previous to you two meeting. You take a leap of faith, hoping they are telling you the truth and are basically good people - but it is just that - a hope and faith, not necessarily, a fact. | |
|
| He is sick, she left him... Posted: 5/21/2008 10:34:40 AM |
I say 'don't cast stones if you live in a glass house'. Everyone is different and so are the couples and none of us knows what we would do until hits where we live. How many boys left their pregnant girlfriends, husbands when the kid had physical problems and wives struck by breast cancer....walk a mile in someone elses shoes before casting stones.
I couldn't have said it better Rustytraveler. Who are we to sit and judge this woman? | |
|
| He is sick, she left him... Posted: 5/21/2008 11:29:38 AM | However not everyone knows they are marrying a pedophile. My very best friend, after 18 yrs of marriage, found out her husband had molested his step-daughter from his previous marriage when he got arrested visiting their old home town.
This would make a good case for annulment of the marriage as he was not honest from the beginning. Where was the honor he promised in those vows. I't good your friend has a friend that would try to help her in such circumstances. After 18 years though annulments are very difficult. I'd tell your friend those vows were not made to the person she thought he was.
So WHICH is it Mac? Do you or do you NOT agree with selfishness? Have you lied??? Which of your lies are we to believe????
Do you still beat your children too?
I suggest you actually read about how the objectivist theory addresses selfishness.
"The Objectivist ethics proudly advocates and upholds rational selfishness—which means: the values required for man’s survival qua man—which means: the values required for human survival—not the values produced by the desires, the emotions, the “aspirations,” the feelings, the whims or the needs of irrational brutes, who have never outgrown the primordial practice of human sacrifices, have never discovered an industrial society and can conceive of no self-interest but that of grabbing the loot of the moment."
The Objectivist ethics holds that human good does not require human sacrifices and cannot be achieved by the sacrifice of anyone to anyone. It holds that the rational interests of men do not clash—that there is no conflict of interests among men who do not desire the unearned, who do not make sacrifices nor accept them, who deal with one another as traders, giving value for value.
From: The Virtue of Selfishness, by; Ayn Rand.
Why don't you go find someone with a mind as small as your's to bicker with. You won't appear so foolish when someone shows your name calling and irrational postulations are just stupid ranting. | |
|
| He is sick, she left him... Posted: 5/21/2008 12:10:20 PM | Ms. Wildirishrose (msg. 114), with due respect, the right we have to judge others with respect to this example is a moral one, and as such, will always be open to great discussion and differing opinions as different people's moralities clash. My opinion of it is that there is a morality of what is right to do and what is wrong, and circumstance and personal experience doesn't change it. I judge other moral issues like murder, racism, bullying, etc. as wrong without having personal experience with any of them. I would have a difficult life indeed if I had to 'walk a mile in the shoes' of everything that I view as morally wrong, before I was able to view them that way. And I'm not saying that I would do things any differently than OP's friend did, as I've not experienced a similar situation in my own life. I'd like to think that I'd stay and stick it out and honour my marriage vows, but until faced with the situation (as others have said), I do not know for sure how I would react. But whether I would leave or whether I would stay would not change the fact that what I did was either right or wrong. And I'd like to think that I have enough moral strength to at least judge myself as doing something very wrong if I were to walk out on an ailing spouse -- just as I have judged OP's friend.
cdn guy | |
|
| He is sick, she left him... Posted: 5/21/2008 2:19:27 PM | Got any more dumb hypotheticals?
LOL - I gave you examples of situations where your absolutist premis was clearly false. They're not all that hypothetical - if you read the papers you'll see it happens quite a lot. Lot's of people enter into marriages and then find out that not everything was as it seemed at the time.
| |
|
| |
| When the going gets tough, the tough get going... Posted: 5/21/2008 4:37:27 PM | It is hard to make a good call on this one as the OP said """ Walk a mile in their shoes """
BUT I would like to comment on SOME posters who were so against this woman, seems they have forgotten their own posts on other threads. Threads in regards to people with mental health issues and not visible physical issues.
So many posters ..... yeaaa she/he is on meds and screwed up, you have the right to leave. Isn't it interesting. Posting one day ... ditch the biitch on the meds ... now its a bit nasty of this woman for not being able to stand by her man.
So hypocritical. | |
|
| He is sick, she left him... Posted: 5/21/2008 4:44:47 PM |
My problem with your judgements are that you are criticizing someone for not being able to do what you yourselves couldn't do....yet you have the audacity and the small mindedness to criticize someone else. I strongly suspect that if she were to fall over dead from the burden that you'd all be pissing on her corpse and cussing her for being selfish for dieing knowing that she was needed in order for someone else to survive.
Once again MacK......WHICH one of your lies are we to believe?
Well isn't this interesting. I didn't read all the pages, just the start .... I was trying to be somewhat nice ....
THANK YOU GRANDMA !!!!
Anyway, talk about your two faced bull crapola !!! Mac you so anoying and so full of your own crap. | |
|
| He is sick, she left him... Posted: 5/21/2008 6:16:08 PM | After reading this thread for the past several days, I am thankful to be single!
Yesterday, I had 4 nerve blocks on my back, with no medications, drove there and back and doing just fine by myself.
By the way, if I were still married to the person I was married to I would probably be doing the same thing..  | |
|
| |
| He is sick, she left him... Posted: 5/21/2008 7:30:03 PM | How typical of you Mac to pick and chose out of context that which suits your own purpose. You fail however to quote:
Rand writes, "[A]ltruism permits no concept of a self-respecting, self-supporting man—a man who supports his own life by his own effort and neither sacrifices himself nor others … it permits no concept of benevolent co-existence among men … it permits no concept of justice" (VOS, ix).
For her, the truly selfish person is a self-respecting, self-supporting human being who neither sacrifices others to himself nor sacrifices himself to others. This value-orientation is brilliantly dramatized in the character of Howard Roark in The Fountainhead. The further elements of selfishness - the character traits that, when translated into action, implement a concern for one's own real interests - are discussed and illustrated in that work, in Atlas Shrugged, and throughout Rand's non-fiction.
OP writes:
I have a friend that was married to a man who was diagnosed with a debilitating disease many years ago. At first she was devoted to him and their children, she worked, looked after the children, kept them in sports and recreation and basically did most of the things that a single parent would do, except she also cared for her partner. The prognosis of the sickness was/is not known and after many, many years (double digits), she finally came to a conclusion that she needed more in her life and that she had to leave him or at least have something on the side. As her friend, I understood her dilemma and supported her decision, while other friends did not, they judged her and condemmed her for deciding to leave and to top it off, her partner eventually decided to leave the matrimonial home and go into a centre that cared for people with the disease. Now she regrets having told her partner (whose initial reaction was a terrible bout with depression). Not only that, she is finding that she gets numerous invites out, but when potential new relationships begin to bud, very often, the man backs off and disappears when she tells him about her past with her husband. Do you think this is a good reason for not wanting to be involved with someone? I don't understand how someone could judge a person this way, if they had not had the experience or witnessed the experience themselves, can anyone enlighten me (and ultimately her)? Let's pretend for a moment that what we read was this:
I have a friend who WAS married to a WOMAN who was diagnosed with a debilitating illness many years ago. At first, HE was devoted to her; worked AND took complete care of the children, not only cooking their meals, and making sure that they were bathed and always wore clean clothes and had their homework assignments done each night, but he made sure that they were involved in many sporting and recreational activities. For double digit years he's basically done all the things that a single Mother would do in addition to caring for his ailing wife. The prognosis of her ailment is not known and after MANY MANY years he came to the conclusion that he needed something more in his life. He longed for just one time before he died to once again be looked at as a man....not as a nurse or a babysitter. Although he had loved her and took his vows seriously, after decades of setting aside his needs and desires as a man, he was exhausted, depressed and devoid of his own identity. He was no longer a man, but simply, Johnny, Susie, and Charlie's Dad; and Jane's nurse; and the paycheck. In his desperate desire to have a woman look at him for who he was...not just what he could do for her; he determined that he either had to leave her....or at least fulfill that ONE "selfish" need of his own....after so many years. (NOW, here's the the story goes awry) As his friend....and his brother- in -law (Jane's brother) I'm frankly surprised that he's waiting so long to come to his senses and realize that he NEEDS to have a life of his own. He has gone above and beyond the call of duty, and is past the breaking point from all the demands put on him. I know a divorced woman who is very discreet, and who has no desire to be married who would be perfect for him to relieve his stress and anxiety; which I believe would go a long way toward revitalizing him and would help him gain renewed strength and patience in dealing with the thankless job of caring for his wife, my sister. The problem is.....my Mother and sisters. They question every minute that he is away from Jane. When his cousin comes to sit with Jane while he takes the boys to football practice, they criticize him for putting his sons ahead of his wife. Mom insisted that she would do their grocery shopping so he can't even get out of the house for an hour on Saturday....and since she deliberately ignores things on the shopping list that he needs....like razor blades, he gets the 3rd degree about why he was 10 minutes late coming home from work (He stopped to get the items that Mom neglected to get.) He's a good guy and he's proven that through the years of sacrifice he's made for his family, but I'm afraid that if he doesn't get some relief soon he's going to either have a heart attact or commit suicide. He's done everything anyone could ask of a man and I think it's time that he considered his own life. I really want to help him, but my one fear is that even if I introduce him to women who seem dead set against marriage or committed relationships, they will change their minds once they meet a guy who has demonstrated such a capacity for selfless devotion and compassion.
My problem was and IS the hypocracy. 70 % of all "caregivers" are female. Of the 30% of male caregivers.....33% of those are homosexual partners. Certain males here would have us believe that women simply are never sick or disabled. NAYYY boys. The difference is LESS than 2%! If we disreguard the 33% of the 30% of homosexuals then that changes it to an 80% vs. 20% ratio. So tell me please??? WHERE ARE ALL OF THESE MEN who are working, raising kids...and being committed to their marriage vows? I'm sorry, but the statistics simply do NOT support your rants.
I will give you this Mac.....you are absolutely correct that men WILL run from a woman who's burned out; but NOT for the reasons that you suggest. Women will look at "caregiving" as a virtue....but men are looking to be "careTAKERS"....it has nothing to do with her sense of morality....and everything to do with how easily she can be stuffed into that role a second time. | |
|
| He is sick, she left him... Posted: 5/21/2008 7:30:57 PM |
And I'd like to think that I have enough moral strength to at least judge myself as doing something very wrong if I were to walk out on an ailing spouse -- just as I have judged OP's friend.
You !!!!!!! | |
|
| He is sick, she left him... Posted: 5/21/2008 7:38:58 PM | How typical of you Mac to pick and chose out of context that which suits your own purpose.
Hmm....GBB, you chide Mac, then you proceed to edit the OP's post to suit your own agenda!
I've got some kettles around the house that don't know their color if you want to come around and straighten them out, Ms. Pot. 
"....it has nothing to do with her sense of morality....and everything to do with how easily she can be stuffed into that role a second time. She stuffed herself into that role when she took her marriage vows. Now if she thought the vows were unreasonable or that she was unable to fulfill them, she should not have taken them.
The point behind everyone's sour judgment is that this woman has a track record of not living up to her promises. The solution for her is simple. Don't make any, don't expect any in return.
| |
|
|
|