Free Dating Site    

Afterall, if you’ve got nothing to hide, who really cares.

When fascism comes to America, it will be because the majority didn't care.

By Berit Kjos
http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/2002/spy.html

Perhaps our government assumes that people are too afraid of terrorism -- or too oblivious to the recent history of totalitarian oppression -- to see the threats behind this program. But ignorance is never bliss to those who have faced the tyranny of Nazism, the cruelties of Soviet socialism or the betrayal of civilian spies who masquerade as trusted neighbors.

The last of those practices is being revived in China as well as in America. In an article titled "China's Neighborly Snoops Reinvent Themselves," Eric Eckholm wrote,

“The old ‘neighborhood committees’ that watched over every household are among the more obnoxious memories of the early decades of Communist rule. Staffed… by one’s nosiest neighbors, the committees were empowered to scrutinize every visitor, report every antisocial activity and even monitor pregnancies….

"With the decline of Marxist fervor… the committees waned…. Now, with experiments in Shenyang and 19 other cities, the government is trying to reinvent this venerable institution."[4]

I barely remember the last year of World War II. Hitler's forces had occupied Norway, and my father faced torture and probable death in a Nazi concentration camp for his part in the Norwegian resistance movement. My grandparents' homes had been confiscated by Nazi officials and their sympathizers who had succumbed to the politically correct dogma and heady promises of power and prosperity.

Neighbors were afraid to trust each other. A chilling message on a plaque in the "Nazi Propaganda" section of the Holocaust Museum (Washington DC) explains why:

"The Gestapo gathered much of its information from private citizens. Even children were taught to report on their parents. The Gestapo's main sources, however, were Nazi party officials who constantly monitored the activities of all citizens [and] used such information to track political opponents."

Could this be happening in America? Strange as it seems, it could. And with today's sophisticated information and surveillance technology, no one would be free from the prying eyes of an intrusive government and its willing servants. Consider these reasons:

1. The blueprint for social control and loss of freedom was drawn decades ago. In 1934, former NEA Executive Secretary Willard Givens warned that "...all of us, including the 'owners', must be subjected to a large degree of social control... the major function of the school is the social orientation of the individual. It must seek to give him understanding of the transition to a new social order." [see Chronology] The leader of the powerful National Education Association would have been pleased with our "progress."

Two years earlier, Aldous Huxley's Brave New World had shed some light on the change process. The masses would have to be so addicted to pleasure and so dulled by trivial pursuits that few would resist the envisioned transformation.[5] Like the proverbial frog, the masses would barely notice the rising heat.

2. School children are trained to tattle on each other. While the 9-11 crisis conveniently prepared the adult masses to accept oppressive controls, the promotion of community spies had already begun to change the minds of our children. Bolstered by the school shootings of recent years, our government put increasing pressure on students, as well as staff, to report all activities that fit a new list of politically incorrect behaviors and attitudes.

To the dismay of agencies that sought more control, many children resisted telling on their friends. "It's the same story over and over," said June Arnette, associate director of the National Schools Safety Center (NSSC), "They don't want to be a snitch."[6]

Even so, the NSSC's guidelines call for tattling on friends and relatives as well as strangers. Its "40 promising strategies" includes social tactics that match UN strategies for conforming "the mental health of the population"[7] to global standards. For example, tactic No. 6 prompts educators to "Encourage students to report any suspicious individuals on school grounds. Provide students and staff with a toll-free, anonymous hotline."[8]

3. The neighborhood spies extends a pattern already tested in schools. When students use those anonymous "hot-lines" to report on classmates, they are not asked to prove their suspicions nor back accusations with witnesses. While most of the student informers probably tell the truth, others could feed slanderous reports into the government's life-long file on someone who happens to offend them. [See Zero Tolerance For Non-Compliance] The victim would never see the message or be able to set the record straight.

"Lifelong learning" is key to the international education system that links American education to the UNESCO blueprint. All people - from cradle to grave - become part of a system intent on producing "responsible" global citizens for the global community. Promoting solidarity by reporting non-compliance is part of that responsibility.

In his article, "US planning to recruit one in 24 Americans as citizen spies," investigative journalist Ritt Goldstein includes this warning:

"Historically, informant systems have been the tools of non-democratic states. According to a 1992 report by Harvard University's Project on Justice, the accuracy of informant reports is problematic, with some informants having embellished the truth, and others suspected of having fabricated their reports.

"Present Justice Department procedures mean that informant reports will enter databases for future reference and/or action. The information will then be broadly available within the department, related agencies and local police forces. The targeted individual will remain unaware of the existence of the report and of its contents."[9]

4. "Mental Health" and "hate crimes" policies promote such reporting. At the 1997 White House conference on Hate Crimes, former President Clinton announced that "The Justice Department will make its own hate crimes training curriculum available. A lot of hate crimes still go unreported.... If a crime is unreported, that gives people an excuse to ignore it." Then he announced a Justice Department website which invites children to tell "trusted adults" about "hateful" or exclusive expressions they might hear at home -- such as a negative comment about unbiblical lifestyles.[10]

The UN plan for "Healthy Cities and Communities" makes this kind of "prevention" a personal duty. "I challenge our young people to realize their important role in this seamless system," said former DHHS Secretary Donna Shalala at the 1996 National Children’s Mental Health Initiative. "Many times, you as friends are the strongest link in the chain of contact. You know best when your brother, your sister or your friend is facing problems..."[11]

Her call for young spies goes far beyond the need to stop violence, and each dramatic social crisis justifies more government control. We shouldn’t be surprised. "Brother will betray brother..." warned Jesus, "and children will rise up against parents.... And you will be hated by all for My name’s sake." Mark 13:12-13

5. All must be included in the global network of data banks. On July 16, 1996, President Clinton signed Executive Order #13011, creating a massive new bureaucracy with authority to manage "Federal Information Technology." It links the data gathered by the health, education, and labor departments to the data accessible to the FBI, CIA, EPA, other federal agencies and international data systems.

Standing alone, this executive order might raise little alarm. But examined in the light of UN documents and stated government intentions, it looks ominous. The UN has called for a sophisticated international computerized information system that would (1) disseminate its politically correct data and pseudo-scientific risk assessments into every community, (2) build consensus based on its visions, goals, values, and choices, then (3) monitor individual and collective compliance everywhere--including our homes.

That data tracking system was mandated in the Beijing Platform for Action, the official UN document signed by the nations at the close of the 1995 UN Conference for Women. "Develop gender-sensitive databases, information and monitoring systems," it states. It calls for the "consistent flow of information" among "national, subregional/regional [FEMA?] and international institutions" - all under the watchful guidance of the United Nations Social and Economic Council. [12]

So when President Clinton established an agency to oversee the implementation of the Beijing Platform, he endorsed a system that would snoop into homes, schools and workplaces. When in place, it would monitor all citizens and organizations (including churches) for compliance with feminist views on gender and a woman's place in the family and society. [See Mine is the Power]

6. Global surveillance networks lessen government accountability. The EU wants communications companies to record all phone calls, e-mails, faxes and net use -- an easy challenge with today's technology.[13] Echelon may be the most extensive global network. It allows the USA, Australia, England and Canada to bypass their own constitutional bans on domestic spying by spying for each other, then sharing the information. In other words, Canada can't spy on its own citizens, but the USA can legally spy for Canada -- making a mockery of law."

7. "Community Policing" programs have been preparing people to accept neighborhood spies. The website for the San Mateo (CA) program explains the new policy: "...continued communication must be maintained with the community. Keep them informed; this provides for a sense of accomplishment and opens up the citizenry to bring forward other problems. Reinforce the philosophy that citizens are the eyes and ears of the community."[14]

Neighborhood Watch is undoubtedly one of the oldest and most well-known crime prevention programs in history. While the modern day concept of program rose to prominence in the late 1960s in response to an increasing burglary rate, the roots of Neighborhood Watch can actually be traced all the way back to the days of Colonial settlements, when night watchmen patrolled the streets.

The modern version of the Neighborhood Watch Program was developed as a result of the multiple requests from sheriffs and police chiefs around the country who were looking for a crime prevention program that would incorporate citizen involvement and address the increasing number of burglaries taking place, especially in rural and suburban areas. In 1972, the National Sheriffs' Association (NSA) took the concept a step further by seeking funding to make the program a national initiative. Thanks to a grant from the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, the National Neighborhood Watch Program was started.

For the first two years, the program was devoted primarily to disseminating information on the nature and volume of burglary and securing residential property and making it less vulnerable to break-ins. From there, it evolved into a program that promoted the establishment of ongoing local neighborhood watch groups that encouraged citizens to partner with their law enforcement agencies in an effort to reduce various types of "neighborhood crime."

Since its beginnings, Neighborhood Watch has grown from an "extra eyes and ears" approach to crime prevention to a much more proactive, community-oriented endeavor providing a unique infrastructure that brings together local officials, law enforcement, and citizens for the protection of their communities. Today's Neighborhood Watch programs incorporate activities that not only address crime prevention issues, but also restore pride and unity to a neighborhood. It is not uncommon to see members of Neighborhood Watch groups participating in community cleanups and other activities that strive to improve the quality of life for community residents.

In addition, the adoption of community policing by local law enforcement agencies has contributed to a resurgence in Watch groups over the years. Neighborhood Watch fits nicely into the framework of law enforcement/community partnerships, and Neighborhood Watch meetings provide a useful forum for airing neighborhood problems and practicing problem-solving techniques.

Furthermore, Neighborhood Watch has become especially practical in our current society, in which two-income families are the norm and many neighborhoods are deserted during the day. While criminals have attempted to use this statistic to their advantage, law enforcement has uncovered an important reality: the communities in which citizens have observed and reported suspicious activity have enjoyed lower crime rates.

As communities throughout the country have adopted the program and reported success, the popularity of the Neighborhood Watch Program has grown, and it continues to still.

http://www.usaonwatch.org/AboutUs/AboutUSAOnWatch.php

Hmmmm, LOWER CRIME through a more close knit community.
and this is an abuse of power????????
Give me a break...

So I am getting from the previous posts that most people here are against Neighborhood Watch?