online dating service
REGISTER | MAIL/PROFILE | HELP | NOW ONLINE | SEARCH | RATING | FORUMS | SUCCESS STORIES

 

Plentyoffish dating forums are a place to meet singles and get dating advice or share dating experiences etc. Hopefully you will all have fun meeting singles and try out this online dating thing... Remember that we are the largest 100% free online dating service, so you will never have to pay a dime to meet your soulmate.
     
Show ALL Forums  > Religion  > The "gay gene"; homosexuality vs: abortion?? [Thread Closed]      Mod Threads Home login  
Page 1 of 4 1, 2, 3, 4
 Author Thread: The "gay gene"; homosexuality vs: abortion?? [Thread Closed]
 Raveninns

Joined: 7/19/2005
Msg: 1
view profile
History
The "gay gene"; homosexuality vs: abortion?? [Thread Closed]
Posted: 8/12/2008 4:42:42 AM
I was reading the Current Events thread, "interesting new theory on what causes homosexuality"

http://forums.plentyoffish.com/datingPosts10462271.aspx

The OP cites an article which postualates that homosexuality may be linked to genetics.

http://psychologytoday.com/articles/pto-20080420-000003.xml


Finding the Switch
Homosexuality may persist because the associated genes convey surprising advantages on homosexuals' family members.

By: Robert Kunzig


I've been thinking about this all morning with some amusement and decided to bring it to the Religion forum.

I've always been pro choice, that is no secret. But I've been attacked on my opinions by the anti abortion/pro life folks on the grounds that it is a religious issue, and that their faith demands that all life is sacred according to their dogma.

Their same dogma emphatically and inherently pronounces that homosexuality is against the wishes of their God. (I've always felt that homosexuals brought their own gifts to the table.) Their outrage at same sex marriages is always under consistent attack, and their lobbying to federal governments is nothing less than heroic.

But just say, in the future, parents are able to identify exactly what traits their unborn child will inherit? What will the anti homosexual proponents do with this paradoxical dilemma?? Will there suddenly be scripture that will be interpreted as a "get out of jail free" card and endorse abortion as they would rather endure this "sin" than contemplate the knowledge that they will be raising a child who is immediately labelled as "sinful" within their doctrine and dogma?

I realise, at this point, this scenario is purely theoretical, but it would appear that science is coming ever closer to at least, partially proving the "gay gene". Interesting times ahead indeed for theologians.

Cheers, Raven
 whitefether

Joined: 6/8/2008
Msg: 2
view profile
History
The gay gene; homosexuality vs: abortion??
Posted: 8/12/2008 5:06:43 AM
I, too, am pro-choice. (hope you don;'t mind my writing on your thread)! But, indeed, it will be a sticky wicket when we start deciding who lives and who is not allowed to live, by genetics,. Brings to mind the "master race" of Hitlers. I, like you Raven, feel that homosexuals bring their own unique gifts to the table (what a wonderful way to say it). Homosexuality is accepted in many cultures around the world. Why do the Christians continue this persecution? When there are murderers and rapists and thieves and God know what else that are needing the attention of those that wish to police the planet. I think that these that wish to condemn the homosexual should someday have someone they love be homosexual. Perhaps then they would see where we are all alike, and quit focusing on the differences.
What you brought up, Raven, makes my blood run cold.


Sherry
 cyranodb1970

Joined: 3/9/2008
Msg: 3
The gay gene; homosexuality vs: abortion??
Posted: 8/12/2008 5:12:50 AM
See, I don't think it should matter if people are gay by genetic or by choice. What two (or more) people do in the privacy of their bedroom is their business and no one else's business. We should not use what they do on their own private time as a basis to deny them the same level of human rights anyone else is entitled to. I think we need to grow up and mature on the topics of gender and sexuality and stop being the bedroom police. Just my two credits on this topic
 Raveninns

Joined: 7/19/2005
Msg: 4
view profile
History
The gay gene; homosexuality vs: abortion??
Posted: 8/12/2008 5:40:39 AM
Been noodling around a little more on this, and actually thought of a few new questions as well.

If the "gay gene" is proven, what does that say about God?

(Personally, it tells me that God don't make no junk..)

But really, how will the dogma driven folk interpret this? Can it be asumed that they've offended their god, so they and their unborn will go to hell? Or will the "Grace" card be played? Me, if I were a believer, would be wondering at this point, what the hell? What did I do to deserve this??? Does a believer have the child, then subject their poor homosexual child to questionable gender re-programming despite their "gayness" being ordained by God? How do you get around this little bit?

Will this begin a new round of genetic tampering/engineering and how does one marry God's gift of life to believers to changing His gift to suit their dogma?

I'll probably think of more....

Cheers, Raven
 romanticoptimist

Joined: 10/1/2007
Msg: 5
The gay gene; homosexuality vs: abortion??
Posted: 8/12/2008 7:06:49 AM
I'm not sure what are facts and what are fiction in this theoretical neverland wander, but I'll try to sort it out and give you the most intelligent response I can.

MY GOD LOVES HOMOSEXUALS AS MUCH AS HE LOVES HETEROSEXUALS.
Let me say it again so that I'm really, really clear on this:
MY GOD LOVES HOMOSEXUALS AS MUCH AS HE LOVES HETEROSEXUALS.

His Grace is as available to the one as it is to the other. His love is as abundant to the one as it is to the other. Jesus death is as available to one as to the other. His forgiveness is as free to the one as to the other. His promises are as valid for the one as the other. The value of a homosexual is equal to the value of a heterosexual in God's eyes. He set no upper or lower limit on all of these things based on the sexual attraction, orientation, or choice of the one or the other.

The "Gay Gene": There are a variety of motives to finding the "gay" gene . The most common seems to be a desire to establish without doubt that "gayness" is something you can do nothing about, something you're born with. This (presumably) then makes homosexuality fully acceptable because it's not a choice. The problem I have with the theory of a "gay" gene is that it provides a simplistic answer to a complex problem and it creates a danger to the people it seems to want to help.

Homosexuality seems to cover a wide range of human activity that doesn't appear to be a result of any one factor. Some homosexuals were "born that way" (the total absence of any other factor, influence, or choice), some were attracted to homosexuality during teen discovery years, some later in life, some are occasionally curious and experimenting, some are so for a period of time in order to satisfy their sexual needs and then abandon homosexuality completely when heterosexual needs can be met, some are bisexual, some are metro-sexual, some are any sort of mix of any of the above and more. And some people I have no reason to doubt have clearly expressed that they have an attraction to the same sex but have chosen not to act on that attraction. These people are still technically "homosexual" but not actively so. Therefore, even if a genetic reason for homosexuality is discovered, it can only be a small part of the answer to why some people are homosexual.

The danger? Even since the late 1800s, scientists have studied humankind in an attempt to remove undesirable traits. Probably the most infamous use of the is Science* of Eugenics was during the Nazi Era in Germany. Eugenics - sometimes dressed in finer clothes and with prettier names - continues to be a part of the scientific community. What would a man like Hitler do with information like this? How much more efficient it would be to test the fetus and remove it before it could be born. Are there leaders of today's world who could and would use such scientific data in an attempt to "cleanse" their population of homosexuality?

*Yes it is a "Science" and those involved are "Scientists" and their methodology is "scientific" -- hmmm. maybe the next time the Crusades get brought up.... :smile

An unrealistic assumption? I don't think so. A simple test of the amniotic fluid can tell the gender of the fetus. That information came as a by-product of another test. However, the amnio test has been used to decide whether to abort or not based purely on the gender of the child. In countries like China it has resulted in the untimely end of millions and millions of female fetuses.

Even this theoretical scenario is based on the assumption that a certain group will be caught in a conflict of values because of the assumption that they would choose to abort a fetus that would grow up to be "gay".
 passionandsong

Joined: 10/9/2007
Msg: 6
view profile
History
The gay gene; homosexuality vs: abortion??
Posted: 8/12/2008 7:19:13 AM
it says in the bible that a man should not lay with another man.(always wondered why lesbianism seemed fine). how then do you deterine what an hermaphradite should do? i believe your gender is of the soul not the body.if you were born to have sex with men ,you have a soul of a woman. hense the femeninity. thereby,a man that has sex with you is having sex with a woman....and yes most people think i am nuts,but the more i delve into this theory the more it appears to be so.
 nexthyme

Joined: 9/12/2007
Msg: 7
view profile
History
The gay gene; homosexuality vs: abortion??
Posted: 8/12/2008 7:42:15 AM
Raven, homosexuality has also been a trait found in animals as well... While writing a paper, I found an article about homosexual, bi sexual, and hetero sexual male sheep.

In fact this trait has been found in most animals... As well they have found that these creatures brains that are found to be homsosexual are more like that of female sheep.

In the future there will be designer babies, where gene traits can be swapped out... Example, Bu polar, homosexuality, blue eyes verse brown, blonde hair, et al, can all be swapped out.

Sometimes things that are different are deemed wrong by man kind, and it isn't until the future that it is discovered that perhaps maybe someone might have made a mistake in judgment... To me this is very sad, because many people have suffered needlessly, simply because they were misunderstood, and judged by another mans ideal of what is holy and what isn't...

Yes I know for those who believe the bible to be 100% correct, this smacks of being a heretic, however I am ok with that, because I don't believe that there are any mistakes created by the Great Divine anyway...
 WeAre1

Joined: 3/18/2008
Msg: 8
view profile
History
The gay gene; homosexuality vs: abortion??
Posted: 8/12/2008 7:51:56 AM
my very basic thoughts are

1. if everything is sacred,
then that means everything and everybody - no exceptions - are sacred...which means heterosexual, homosexual, creating what we want as perfectly chosen babies/people, the choice for abortion, or not....it all is included in sacredness....

or

2. everything, it seems, is a sin
as I have been privy to now that I was not aware of before - ever since reading the religious threads, especially (it seems to me) when posters back up their thoughts on this subject of sin by referencing the bible....

It is no paradox, Raven, as far as I can see.....it seems it is either one or the other with no grey....for there is no room for grey when it comes to religion (imo).

EDIT: to post below: perhaps some don't realize, but in Judaiism, the New Testament is not considered 'the bible', just the Old Testament and so believing in Jesus is not part of using the bible in that religion, for he is, very basically, the 'new addition' of the 'new testament'. So, perhaps just be aware that not everyone who says they believe things from the bible are talking about Jesus at all.....we must always be careful with our assumptions (imo and including me in that thought too!).
 passionandsong

Joined: 10/9/2007
Msg: 9
view profile
History
The gay gene; homosexuality vs: abortion??
Posted: 8/12/2008 8:07:43 AM
Yes I know for those who believe the bible to be 100% correct, this smacks of being a heretic, however I am ok with that, because I don't believe that there are any mistakes created by the Great Divine anyway

to believe that the bible is 100% correct is also to believe that we are not to cast others to sin.our role is to simply persuade our brothers and sisters to except jesus. you do not have to stop sinning to do that.the love the lord gives will provide the strength to do so. those who cast others into hell for their supposed wrong doings are performing a task that is not theirs to take on. jesus didnt die on the cross for those who were following the lord only.he died for all.inclueding those that were torturing him.he loved everyone.
 georgiabulldogfan

Joined: 9/22/2007
Msg: 10
view profile
History
The gay gene; homosexuality vs: abortion??
Posted: 8/12/2008 10:38:15 AM
I think all humans have what you call a "sin gene" not "gay gene", or "straight gene". At them moment we are born we are born into sin, we have fleshy desires that is enmity against God. Whether or not you are born gay or decided to be gay or whatever it may be it is against God. Society today has embraced sin and thumbed their noses at God when it comes to this issue. So when it comes to the "oh they was born that way" that actually supports christian beliefs not discredits it. We are born sinners and God has provided a way in which we can turn from certain areas in our lifes and be who we should be.
 romanticoptimist

Joined: 10/1/2007
Msg: 11
The gay gene; homosexuality vs: abortion??
Posted: 8/12/2008 11:14:37 AM
^^^^ Hmmm. Wonders out loud if there's an "adultery" gene? Maybe a "liar, liar,pants on fire" gene? How about a "profiting from a false gospel" gene? A "cheating on taxes" gene? A "judging" gene? Oh, the possibilities are endless.
 Diva_31

Joined: 6/24/2008
Msg: 12
The gay gene; homosexuality vs: abortion??
Posted: 8/12/2008 1:38:30 PM
Does it really matter? At the end of the day, we're all human aren't we?
 Raveninns

Joined: 7/19/2005
Msg: 13
view profile
History
The gay gene; homosexuality vs: abortion??
Posted: 8/12/2008 3:07:48 PM

MY GOD LOVES HOMOSEXUALS AS MUCH AS HE LOVES HETEROSEXUALS.
Let me say it again so that I'm really, really clear on this:
MY GOD LOVES HOMOSEXUALS AS MUCH AS HE LOVES HETEROSEXUALS


What did you say? lol lol

lol, just joshin' with ya. And I agree, the Jesus I know says that God loves everyone. Absolutely no argument there with you Romantic. None.

BUT



Even this theoretical scenario is based on the assumption that a certain group will be caught in a conflict of values because of the assumption that they would choose to abort a fetus that would grow up to be "gay".


Are you deliberately being coy here? You well know that it has been repeated here in the religion forums, time and time and time again, ad nauseum, by Christians, that a homosexual is against God's laws in the Bible and they're goin' to hell, one way ticket. That "certain group" , the "Moral Majority" in the US, pays millions and millions of dollars to lobbyists to get the laws changed regarding same sex marriages.

So what will their answer be to this "theoretical" dilemma, I ask again? And actually, I just checked back in the Current Events forum and a poster Kaos86 has cited articles to show that politicians have already introduced bills to stop abortion of gay fetuses.

hmmm, probably not so theoretical after all.....

Cheers, Raven
 Kaos86

Joined: 3/7/2007
Msg: 14
The gay gene; homosexuality vs: abortion??
Posted: 8/12/2008 3:47:11 PM
Raven you are misinterpreting the Bible.
A key componant for Christians is the concept of sinner versus sin.
Love the sinner and hate the sin was the message of Christ.

It is an interesting question though what would I do if I knew my wife was carrying a gay child?
As a Christian(Roman Catholic) I would never abort. Certainly there are Christians on the extreme that might feel differently.

Thanks for the acknowledgement Raven. You are a class act.
 Apologist~D.A

Joined: 2/28/2008
Msg: 15
view profile
History
The gay gene; homosexuality vs: abortion??
Posted: 8/12/2008 4:41:31 PM
Confucius say "If one truly desires to debate with others from another mother (religious that is), being caustic and ridiculing their beliefs is a sure way to repulse their sensibilities and end up all alone with no one to taunt."
 nexthyme

Joined: 9/12/2007
Msg: 16
view profile
History
The gay gene; homosexuality vs: abortion??
Posted: 8/12/2008 5:41:40 PM
The moral of this story, adding what was stated that a bill was being introduced that a child that is gay could not be aborted, is very interesting, and will be extremely contraversial...

Abortion is legal, and those that chose it, don't write on a little card (from what I know) as to why they are terminating their pregnancy. Inconvenience is good enough for the abortion clinic.

In China, it is called double xx syndrom to be a female fetus, and a perfectly great reason to terminate.

I can here a lot of lot of pro choice getting their guns ready on any bill that takes away a womans right to chose whether to remain pregnant or not...

Don't get me wrong, I am not one who believes in abortion for myself, and whether any of my children had been born gay, well that just would have been something to embrace, and deal with... I have a child that is Bi polar, and I never would of considered if there had been some test to terminate her either... However not all people feel the same, and have terminated for less of a reason.

WOw, the things people come up with as a reason to preselect what they deem a perfect child...

I have relatives that are gay, and including a closet lesbian older sister...

My mother made the comment that she really screwed up, and created a gay child....

I don't get along with my oldest sister at all, BUT to hear my mom say that nearly made me hurl... Sometimes people just don't get it, people are people, and it is about being able to love others as you would have them love you, that makes this world more at peace.
 sassyaquarius

Joined: 4/10/2006
Msg: 17
The gay gene; homosexuality vs: abortion??
Posted: 8/12/2008 5:42:11 PM

But just say, in the future, parents are able to identify exactly what traits their unborn child will inherit? What will the anti homosexual proponents do with this paradoxical dilemma?? Will there suddenly be scripture that will be interpreted as a "get out of jail free" card and endorse abortion as they would rather endure this "sin" than contemplate the knowledge that they will be raising a child who is immediately labelled as "sinful" within their doctrine and dogma?
Wow, very cool question Raven!!! Way to get people thinking :)

If the "gay gene" is proven, what does that say about God?

(Personally, it tells me that God don't make no junk..)
Have to agree.. regardless of whether this gene theory is proven 100% correct. As far as I had heard, a lot is determined by prenatal hormones. And who cares anyway? As though science can determine what we should know already (imo)... that we are ALL worthy to be here and equal in God's eyes, regardless of skin color, sexual orientation or anything else that isn't in the so called mainstream of what is acceptable.

But really, how will the dogma driven folk interpret this? Can it be asumed that they've offended their god, so they and their unborn will go to hell? Or will the "Grace" card be played? Me, if I were a believer, would be wondering at this point, what the hell? What did I do to deserve this??? Does a believer have the child, then subject their poor homosexual child to questionable gender re-programming despite their "gayness" being ordained by God? How do you get around this little bit?
Will this begin a new round of genetic tampering/engineering and how does one marry God's gift of life to believers to changing His gift to suit their dogma?
The absolute irony! An innocent little baby being looked at that way before it even opens its eyes to this world..

I too am pro-choice, but the very thought of the likelihood of all this sickens me to the core.
 Apologist~D.A

Joined: 2/28/2008
Msg: 18
view profile
History
The gay gene; homosexuality vs: abortion??
Posted: 8/12/2008 5:50:57 PM
An innocent little baby being looked at that way before it even opens its eyes to this world..

I too am pro-choice, but the very thought of the likelihood of all this sickens me to the core.
But youre ok with a baby's neck being twisted until broken, then their brains sucked out through a tube while their mother gives birth at nine months? Because that kind of abortion happens every day that pro-choicers vote for the savage act of barbarism.
I am outraged every time I hear of someone that pities everyone but the defenseless infant..they dont have a voice but by God, you'll hear mine, if it kills me.
 Ravenstar66

Joined: 8/27/2007
Msg: 19
view profile
History
The gay gene; homosexuality vs: abortion??
Posted: 8/12/2008 5:52:43 PM
I agree with Romantic that there are some cases where choice has more to do with homosexuality than say, genetics.. SOME cases. Unfortunately a fair amount of these cases also have child abuse behind them..sad, but true. Most homosexuals I know though are decidedly born that way.. and for the life of me I can't figure out what the problem is, they love, bleed, work and die just like anyone else.. it isn't part of my make-up to see any wrong there (and I include lesbians as well.. to me "Homosexual" covers both). As far as the BIble goes.. well there's a LOT in there that is considered "forbidden" yet most modern christians (or the Church) seem to be able to pick and choose which those things are.. I haven't yet seen the addendum from God that points out which of his directives count and which don't. Isn't eating pork and shrimp and having sex with menstruating women, or being near a dead body on the same list somewhere? Who has decided which of these things pisses God off the most?

As far as genetic screening goes.. it's kind of like stem cell research, isn't it? Are we as a race going to be able to draw up workable ethics for messing with the code of life itself? If we can't stop blowing each other up and abusing one another and allowing children to starve in a world of plenty how the hell are we going to be able to agree on who deserves to be born or not?

We are technnologically WAY ahead of our ethical ability.. we have so much to learn before we are remotely capable of wielding that power with any kind of true love for our own race.

Sometime I hope that aliens DO land on our little blue world, just to shake us up and make us realize just how precious it all is, how small our world really is and how fvcking STUPID and FEARFUL and SELF-ABSORBED we have been.

It is SO horrible to love in this world, yet murderers and liars are given positions of honour and power.

Sometimes I am ashamed to be human.
 sassyaquarius

Joined: 4/10/2006
Msg: 20
The gay gene; homosexuality vs: abortion??
Posted: 8/12/2008 6:31:51 PM

But youre ok with a baby's neck being twisted until broken, then their brains sucked out through a tube while their mother gives birth at nine months? Because that kind of abortion happens every day that pro-choicers vote for the savage act of barbarism.
I am outraged every time I hear of someone that pities everyone but the defenseless infant..they dont have a voice but by God, you'll hear mine, if it kills me.
Hey Da... I understand that you are passionate about being pro-life, and so long as you don't go bombing abortion clinics, I am totally cool with that, I actually understand where you are coming from even if my beliefs have a different slant.

Personally I could never do it, but I know and love a few people who have. One of them is my own mother, and it isn't my place to judge her actions. Do I hate her for preventing me from having a little brother or sister? No.. my mom was not really prepared to be a mom, and was abusive in virtually every way possible. So... would I have wanted my little sister or brother to take a beating along with me? Not so much. Perhaps God felt the same.. who am I to say?

Guess you didn't really need all of that information, but I thought I would provide it nevertheless. You are pro-life and I respect that, I am pro-choice and hopefully you can afford me the same in return.

As to the stance that God is somehow against gays? That one I will not stay quiet on, not now and not EVER.
 Kaos86

Joined: 3/7/2007
Msg: 21
The gay gene; homosexuality vs: abortion??
Posted: 8/12/2008 6:42:24 PM

o.. my mom was not really prepared to be a mom, and was abusive in virtually every way possible.

I would never claim to know who God favors or disfavors however their is a better way.
How about adoption?
I have an adopted niece and we are all so blessed with her birth mothers decision.
 swedishcarrina

Joined: 11/23/2006
Msg: 22
view profile
History
The gay gene; homosexuality vs: abortion??
Posted: 8/13/2008 6:38:48 AM
"See, I don't think it should matter if people are gay by genetic or by choice. What two (or more) people do in the privacy of their bedroom is their business and no one else's business. We should not use what they do on their own private time as a basis to deny them the same level of human rights anyone else is entitled to. I think we need to grow up and mature on the topics of gender and sexuality and stop being the bedroom police. Just my two credits on this topic"

Well said.

I am not pro choice personally. I think abortion is messed up, I could not do it, but then again I have no right to judge anyone. You want to mess your body up like that, hey go for it. I do see the point being made by this thread. I have always believed there was some sort of biological or genetic thing going on. My brother is gay. It is something that has been apparent since we where kids. It never occurred to me that he choose to be gay as we grew up. It seemed more it choose him, you know? No one else that I know of is gay in my family, BTW.

Interesting topic.
 Raveninns

Joined: 7/19/2005
Msg: 23
view profile
History
The gay gene; homosexuality vs: abortion??
Posted: 8/13/2008 6:49:27 AM

Raven you are misinterpreting the Bible.
A key componant for Christians is the concept of sinner versus sin.
Love the sinner and hate the sin was the message of Christ.


Respectfully, I do not believe I have misinterpreted the Bible. "Love the sinner, hate the sin" is a wonderful message, yet so often, never followed. Views on homosexuality, from a Biblical perspective, fall neatly into this category.

They are damned to eternity in hell. Their only salvation is to not practice their sexuality at all. What kind of life is that? Why would a parent bring in to this life a child who would be forever damned and cause this new life untold misery for the rest of their life? Reading articles by gay people who face this has led to the decision(s) of either celibacy or suicide, sometimes both.

I couldn't really find anything to support homosexuality by and for Christians.

However, I've been reading an article by Kevin J. Sanders, entitled, "What options are available for two Jewish gay men to have a physical relationship?"
see: http://members.tripod.com/~djs28/gayrelations.htm

Really good article! He postulates:


Also in Hilchot Shabbat, the Tzitz Eliezer and the Chelkat Yaackov allow the desecration of the Sabbath for the purposes of saving someone who is suicidal.

In the case of someone who is dying, many poskim permit such a person to forego treatments which may extend his life somewhat because of mental anguish of the patient and the family.

While all these cases seem to imply that mental anguish would be enough to permit transgression of a Torah commandment based on the concept of someone in mental anguish being considered someone equivalent to those whom are dangerously ill, the question arises if this is allowed because of a one-time dispensation or in theory, could mental anguish be enough to permit regular violations of Torah law?

The fact is that the Torah and halacha do not deal with letting a person off with a warning "this time" or letting you get away with this "just this once." Were someone to need to violate a Torah law on a regular basis to save life, this would also be permitted again and again.


and in another example where Jews were to face death if not prepared to convert to Islam, their law was suspended, as staying alive was paramount, rather than minding the rules...


This left the majority of Jews in these countries with the unenviable choice of converting completely to Islam or accepting martyrdom. Rabbi Berel Wein in his book of Jewish history explains that many Jews asked one of the rabbis of the time if it would be permitted to convert outwardly to Islam while remaining Jewish in private. He had told them no, and they should prepare for martyrdom. Rabbi Wein relates that many Jews cracked after this and converted to Islam completely, while others preparing to be martyrs cracked under the tremendous emotional strain. Into this melee, Rambam injected himself and offered proofs that it would be permissible to convert outwardly to Islam while retaining as many as possible of the Jewish laws as the people could.

Another case which is quite similar is that of the Jews in Egypt. According to legend, Rambam used to sign all his letters, Moshe Ben Maimon who transgresses three negative commandments in the Torah every day of his life. This is based on the biblical injunction against returning to Egypt. Again, while theoretically the Jews of Egypt could have moved elsewhere, because of the mental anguish of such a possible move, they were permitted to stay where they were.

It would seem clear then, based on the halacha, that there would be room to provide certain leniency for homosexual Jews to have some form of physical expression of their feelings. Nor would it seem that it is necessary to try to spend years going through therapy or to try to get married. I certainly would not advocate simply accepting on faith that someone is homosexual. After a competent therapist has been consulted and it has been determined that this person is indeed homosexual, it would seem that conversion therapy or marriage would not be called for and would actually be prohibited.


So, in cases where all options have been explored, and suicide remains as the only sensible recourse, I feel that many Christians, if faced with having a homosexual son or daughter, will revert to more Jewish law. After all, Jesus was a Jew, wasn't he? lol, There, perfect solution!

But still, no-one has answered the question yet, have they? Will their stance on abortion change when faced with the probability that their offspring will probably go to hell?

Interestingly, the same article quoted cites the Jewish law on abortion, which goes on to say:


In Hilchot Ibur (pregnancy), Rav Elyashiv, the Sheelat Yaavetz, the Torat Chesed and the Even Haezer permitted an abortion within 40 days of conception for a woman who was suicidal over having a child. The Tzitz Eliezer permitted abortions up to the 7th month for similar reasons and in cases where the baby is going to be severely deformed or will die soon after birth. All this is based of course, on the mental anguish of the mother.

The reasoning of the poskim (rabbinic authorities) who permit before 40 days is also relevant to our case, since the reasoning is that until that time, the Talmud considers the fetus as "mere waters" and therefore the only prohibition involved is shikvat zera (spilling seed) as opposed to murder. The Tzitz Eliezer brings a different proof to allow abortions up to 7 months, however this is not relevant to our case.


bold is mine

So, the Jewish faith allows for abortion. Can't help but think that many, when faced with a choice, will fall back on the comforting fact that Jesus was a Jew.


But youre ok with a baby's neck being twisted until broken, then their brains sucked out through a tube while their mother gives birth at nine months? Because that kind of abortion happens every day that pro-choicers vote for the savage act of barbarism.
I am outraged every time I hear of someone that pities everyone but the defenseless infant..they dont have a voice but by God, you'll hear mine, if it kills me.


Holy Smokes girl, I don't believe it will kill you. But your example is, in my opinion, one that is hardly the norm, and a sensationalist tactic. I don't know of any hospital or physician who would support abortion in the NINTH month. Care to supply some evidence for this? And does your ideology extend to your Christian president who has started a war built on lies that has displaced hundreds of thousands of children in Iraq from their homes?


As far as genetic screening goes.. it's kind of like stem cell research, isn't it? Are we as a race going to be able to draw up workable ethics for messing with the code of life itself? If we can't stop blowing each other up and abusing one another and allowing children to starve in a world of plenty how the hell are we going to be able to agree on who deserves to be born or not?


Wise words.


As to the stance that God is somehow against gays? That one I will not stay quiet on, not now and not EVER.


Me either. I am so upset that they have to make decisions of either being celibate, believing in no God at all or suicide. Wow, some choices.

{By the way, to all Gay folks, as a matter of historical interest, Native people revered you all, as it was thought that the Creator gave you to us as gifts as you had "two Spirits", meaning you were blessed with both the male and female gifts of understanding.}


I would never claim to know who God favors or disfavors however their is a better way.
How about adoption?


A simple and quite sensible solution. But as a former Adoption worker, I can speak from experience that unless the child is newborn, and the family history is more or less pristine, many folks would rather pass. Sadly, there are thousands and thousands of kids in permanent care that stay in care until they are eighteen.

And finally, lol, Koas brought up another situation in the other thread that cracked me up too....


Considering that the alternative lifestyle lobby has been instrumental in the abortion rights movement how will they argue against people aborting a "gay fetus"?


lol lol, maybe Kaos, you'd might consider starting a new thread???

Cheers, Raven
 VADancer63

Joined: 7/3/2008
Msg: 24
view profile
History
The gay gene; homosexuality vs: abortion??
Posted: 8/13/2008 7:32:35 AM
The cause for homosexuality is quite simple. It's a choice.

Most people won't want to admit that for various reasons, but fundamentally denying the fact that it's a choice, denies (or sets aside) the responsibility that one has over that choice.

i.e. : I'm gay but it's not my fault it's genetic. (He knows something isn't right with it. He's a misfit because he's gay. It doesn't fit into society's norms, but" hey it's not my fault I'm a misfit.")
My son's gay but it not his fault something is wrong with him. (reduces shame a man has for his gay son)

Everything that a person likes or dislike is a choice he/she makes at some point. Most people do it so automatically they don't realize they are making a choice. Next time you experience something new, take notice to the choices you are making & and ask yourself why. It's very enlightening.

I want to also point out why psychology/psychiatry would lead you to believe it's genetic or a chemical imbalance. It's for profit! They want you to believe they can do something about it if you throw enough money at them. They invent some drug or therapy that does nothing but make them money. It's a fantasy they put up to make money. They have no pathological proof that any of this is genetic or a "chemical imbalance of the brain".

I know this may infuriate some people, for that I apologize. I hope my viewpoint opens some eyes.

Thank you.
 romanticoptimist

Joined: 10/1/2007
Msg: 25
The gay gene; homosexuality vs: abortion??
Posted: 8/13/2008 8:00:04 AM
^^^^ How phenomenally ignorant of you! No, make that magnanimously foolish! Some are homosexuals by choice, some are homosexuals because life and circumstances made them so, some are homosexuals because of genetic or factors surrounding their conception, and some are homosexual sometimes and other times not. There is no one "way to become gay". Except to the terminally clueless, bigoted, and truly ignorant.

As for wanting to deny responsibility for being a homosexual. Why? Why would anyone want to deny responsibility for being shorter or taller than the "norm". Should someone born with a rare blood type apologize for being thus?

As for eye-opening, YOU FIRST!
Page 1 of 4 1, 2, 3, 4
 
Show ALL Forums  > Religion  > The "gay gene"; homosexuality vs: abortion?? [Thread Closed]