| Steele new leader of the RNC, how do you feel about that? Limbaugh most influential republican? Posted: 2/5/2009 9:42:32 AM | Steele has just been presented as the new leader or image of the RNC. Is this just a plow to pull minorities to the party. Many tend to forget that many African Americans were republicans before they became democrats. The republican party was the original party of the black community. Will this truly have an impact on the image of the RNC.
---------------------------
Michael Stephen Steele[2] (born October 19, 1958) is an American politician currently serving as the chairman of the Republican National Committee. He is the first African-American to hold this position. Steele was also the first African American to serve in a state-wide office in Maryland, as the Lieutenant Governor of Maryland from 2003 to 2007, and he was the first Republican elected to that office. From 2003 to 2005, Steele and Lt. Gov. Jennette Bradley of Ohio were the highest-ranking elected black Republicans in the United States. Steele held this distinction solo from 2005 to 2007 after Bradley resigned to become Ohio State Treasurer. Steele ran for a Maryland United States Senate seat being vacated by retiring senator Paul Sarbanes, but he lost the 2006 election to Democratic Congressman Ben Cardin. Steele then served as chairman of GOPAC and worked as a partner at the law firm of Dewey & LeBoeuf.
---------------------------------------------
It was also stated on CNN that Rush Limbaugh is the most influential republican at the present time. What is really going on?
---------------------------------------------
Limbaugh is GOP party leader
By Joan Weysler | Wednesday, February 4, 2009 4:33 PM CST | () comments The Republicans in Congress vote in lockstep because they fear the backlash from their true party leader, Rush Limbaugh. One congressman who criticized Limbaugh found the backlash so great that he apologized the next day.
In spite of the fact that Limbaugh is a thrice-divorced convicted drug abuser who has pledged his best to make President Barack Obama fail, Republicans must follow their leader. They’ll follow him over a cliff, if necessary, and take America with them.
Joan Weysler
Iowa City
| |
|
| Steele new leader of the RNC, how do you feel about that? Limbaugh most influential republican? Posted: 2/5/2009 10:01:58 AM |
The republican party was the original party of the black community. So what if the republican party was the original party of the black community? Things change.
Lots of uppity rich Democrats that made their millions while the republicans were in office have switched to being greedy republicans. People cater to the political party that will cater to them and meet their needs.
I have lived in Ohio, Hawaii, Arizona and now Florida. In all that time, I have never seen a Republican "embrace" the black community in any way, shape, or form.
I had OBAMA signs for my yard, a bumper sticker for my car.
I live in a predominantly Republican area outside of Tampa, Florida ... "Hillbilly Haven"/"Redneckville"/"KKK Town".
Believe me ... if I would have put those signs out in my yard or the bumper sticker on my car ... they would have burned my house and car down.
I don't see much hope in this area of any black being voted in to office from the Republican side no matter who the RNC is.
I don't give a flying leap about Rush Limbaugh ... he's an idiot. | |
|
| Steele new leader of the RNC, how do you feel about that? Limbaugh most influential republican? Posted: 2/5/2009 10:05:37 AM | African Americans were republicans after the civil war. Lincoln was a republican. Martin Luther King's family was republican. During the civil rights movement when the dixcrats (working class whites) moved over to the republican party blacks moved over to the democratic party. But, yes the RNC is the original party of the African American community. No, it would not have been in your lifetime, because you have only been alive since or during civil rights. | |
|
| Steele new leader of the RNC, how do you feel about that? Limbaugh most influential republican? Posted: 2/5/2009 10:09:40 AM | I like what I've heard of Steele thus far.
But saddest of all is now Joe the not a Plumber is a Republican advisor!!! Combine that with Limbaugh and Hannity the Republicans can quit worrying why they lost this past November and start wondering why they are going to lose more the next election cycle. As long as they look to and represent the narrow-minded hate-filled faces of the recent Republican party they will be in an ever growing minority. | |
|
| Steele new leader of the RNC, how do you feel about that? Limbaugh most influential republican? Posted: 2/5/2009 1:23:25 PM | I am so happy Michael Steele won the chairmanship. Not because he is black, but because he understands how to connect with people. He is such a great choice.
I hate not being a member of a party, and it is mostly because I don't see either party working for the majority of the people. I have great hopes that Mr. Steele has a more centrist vision of the direction the Republican Party needs to go, and will be able to lead the party to a more realistic and centralized platform. | |
|
| Steele new leader of the RNC, how do you feel about that? Limbaugh most influential republican? Posted: 2/5/2009 1:49:19 PM | Michael Steele is one of the best PEOPLE out there...from either party. He is honest,direct and I believe he will bring our party back to the forefront. As for el Rushbo...I listen to him on occasion and find him to be rude and obnoxious at times...but he does have some very good points...either way...he is not the most influential person in the Republican party...that honor belongs to Michael Steele! | |
|
| Steele new leader of the RNC, how do you feel about that? Limbaugh most influential republican? Posted: 2/5/2009 2:54:16 PM | Steele is a proven liar and a cheat, a Rove and Cheney protege. Just another republican puppet that will help in the demise of the RNC.
With financial and other support from Karl Rove and Cheney, Steele formally announced his candidacy for the U.S. Senate on October 25, 2005. Polling in February 2006 showed the Lieutenant Governor lost significant ground against Cardin, although he remained statistically even with Mfume. He was endorsed by Mike Tyson during the campaign. Steele's television ads for the election never stated that he was the Republican candidate. Cardin won the primary election on September 12, 2006.
Steele's campaign hit several speed-bumps. Just prior to formally announcing his candidacy, Steele took flak for his defense of former Gov. Bob Ehrlich's decision to hold himself a $100,000 fund-raiser at a country club which had a whites-only membership policy, saying these policies were "not an issue" because "I don't know that much about that club and its membership...nor do I care, quite frankly, because I don't play golf."
Steele lost the general election to Cardin on November 7, 2006, getting 44% of the vote to Cardin's 55%. The Washington Post reported that on election day the Steele campaign arranged for buses of low income and homeless people from Philadelphia to distribute fliers at polls. The flyers contained incorrect information, including a statement that Michael Steele was endorsed by prominent state Democrats and African American leaders who had not, in fact, endorsed him. The homeless people were falsely identified as volunteers although they were paid, and the campaign funds used for this purpose of hiring the homeless were not timely or properly reported or attributed to the campaign.
I'm pretty happy about Limbaugh being held up as the standard holder for repugnantins, He continually reinforces my opinion of why he flunked out of college and can only make money as a jerk on the radio. The repugnantins are learning the hard way that their dogma and style have lost the power of influencing mindless dittohead mentality.
We now have someone that will show intelligence and intellect as a role model in the president. | |
|
| |
| Steele new leader of the RNC, how do you feel about that? Limbaugh most influential republican? Posted: 2/5/2009 8:16:38 PM | I don't know anything about Steele, beyond his name, but I will be researching him. Limbaugh, I am all too familiar with, and I don't plan to spend a nanosecond reading about him. Whata gasbag. Bellicose, overly-inflated, egotistical, distortion expert.
The Republicans took a whuppin' this year. My hope is that those with their faculties about them will show some grace and try to lend a hand in healing this country and its citizens.
I suspect that if you cut them, they will bleed--just like the rest of us.
God Bless--Peace to All. | |
|
| Steele new leader of the RNC, how do you feel about that? Limbaugh most influential republican? Posted: 2/5/2009 9:11:38 PM | What I don't understand at all ... is all this pre-occupation with the blacks this and the blacks that. Who cares what political party the blacks frequent or what political party they used to frequent?
** ... Does anyone care what political party the Native Americans frequent? ** ... Do we care what political party the Irish or Chinese frequent? ** ... Does anyone care what political party the Germans or French frequent?
All were part of making this country what it is.
My ancestors contributed in many ways to what this country is. My German ancestor was a cook for the Union Army (an indentured slave) and his Native American wife followed him from battlefield to battlefield helping him. Helping him to cook for the soldiers that eventually won the war and the result was to free the black slaves. My own ancestor never got his freedom, but he sure contributed to the freedom of the blacks. His wife was eventually banned to a reservation ... but she also contributed to the freedom of the blacks.
So I just fail to understand why some folks are so pre-occupied all the time with the blacks this and the blacks that?
What's with that?
The Chairman of a national political party doesn't make up the party ... it's the people who make up the party and ultimately the people who vote for whomever. If the head of the party is a jerk and the people follow blindly ... then shame on them.
How about if we focus on that aspect and not always just the "black" aspect of things?
If you want, I can focus on black. Do you realize that ... If I put down on work applications that I am "black" ... I could have 10 times as many job offers here as I now have? If I had put down on my children's applications for a special school in Columbus, Ohio years ago that they were "black" ... they would have been accepted immediately? If they thought for one minute that I was even part "black" at my last job ... I wouldn't have been discriminated against?
Does it occur to some that we all have some sort of heritage and our ancestors have all paid a price ... at one time or another? How do you think it feels to grow up with an obviously German last name ... right after WWII? I could tell you. | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| Steele new leader of the RNC, how do you feel about that? Limbaugh most influential republican? Posted: 2/6/2009 2:47:42 PM | Come on Frank...do you actually think the DEMONCRATS care about the blacks, Hispanics or anyone else? If they did they would not hold them back with welfare, making them a dependent class ...voter base for the Demons...you bet...all politicians care till they get your vote...
History says when democrats get in control unemployment goes down, repugnantins destroy jobs when they are in power. Steele thinks the only thing unemployed people are good for is promising to pay them to lie for him and then he welches on his promise. | |
|
| |
| |
| Steele new leader of the RNC, how do you feel about that? Limbaugh most influential republican? Posted: 2/6/2009 4:30:17 PM | Correct Steele,
The democratic party is not pure. They were once known as the dixiecrats and had a very negative image. A friend of mine said that the pendulum swings back and forth.
I was just wondering if the republican party was doing this as a form of exploitation, trying to change the image? I do think more blacks will eventually move toward the republican party because they align themselves with many of their core beliefs (religion, gay marriage, etc.)
Only time will tell until then I am a proud independent. | |
|
| Steele new leader of the RNC, how do you feel about that? Limbaugh most influential republican? Posted: 2/6/2009 5:17:06 PM |
Got any proof there Kev...back it up with an unbiased report...Our taxes go thru the roof...more welfare...more entitlement programs...this is what happens when the DEMONCRATS are in power. Show me other wise....
Google the department of labor statistics and cross-reference the dates of presidents in power. That shouldn't be too challenging for you.
However, I believe you've been too indoctrinated to see the real facts and provide us with more pithy comebacks. i.e. Clinton left us the lowest unemployment in recent history and you can talk about his BJ. | |
|
| Steele new leader of the RNC, how do you feel about that? Limbaugh most influential republican? Posted: 2/6/2009 5:43:26 PM | The Democrats had a woman do really well in her bid for the Democratic nomination, so the Republicans ran out and got Palin. oops. Now the Democrats have a black man in office, so the Republicans go get their token black to head their party. A game of follow the leader is going on.
If the Republican party allows itself to be branded as the party of Rush Limbaugh, you guys are in for major losses during the next elections. The guy is nothing but a cheerleader. An armchair quarterback with a microphone hoping the country goes down the toilet under Obama's watch. That's not patriotism. That's borderline anarchy. | |
|
| |
| Steele new leader of the RNC, how do you feel about that? Limbaugh most influential republican? Posted: 2/6/2009 6:39:27 PM |
Kevie...Kevie... It is your job to post the facts...not run your mouth[or keyboard]...back up your posts...show the proof. You can stop flaming and baiting ...your not doing much for your credibility here bub!
I guess you don't know how to google and you definitely can't stay on topic.
This thread is about how we feel about Steele, which I've already stated as I feel great republicans picked a liar and a cheat to lead them as it means their days are numbered. | |
|
| Steele new leader of the RNC, how do you feel about that? Limbaugh most influential republican? Posted: 2/6/2009 8:10:24 PM |
The democratic party is not pure. They were once known as the dixiecrats … OP ... let's tell them the whole story. Actually, they were just a splinter party of the Democratic Party … not at all the entire party as is insinuated.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Who_were_the_Dixiecrats
The Dixiecrat party was a segregationist, populist, socially conservative splinter party of the Democratic Party in the mid-20th century who were determined to protect what they saw as the Southern "way of life" against what they perceived as an oppressive federal government.
And here is more about them … again not at all what the OP is insinuating:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6174879/
Disaffected Democrats formed the nucleus of today’s GOP Black Americans were beneficiaries of Democratic policies, including President Truman's 1948 signing of Executive Order 9981, committing the U.S. government to integrating a long-segregated military. Civil rights programs under President Kennedy and, more dramatically, under President Johnson (the Great Society program and his role in the passage of the 1965 Voting Rights Act) further cemented the relationship between blacks and Democrats. But by then, the split that started between the Democrats and many of their white southern counterparts — who bristled at Truman's 1948 desegregation order and the Democrats' subsequent support of the civil rights movement — had widened into a chasm. The Dixiecrats — those disaffected Democrats who bolted to the Republican party in 1964 — were pivotal to the success of Richard Nixon's “southern strategy” in 1968, and formed the nucleus of what would ultimately become the modern GOP. So it was not the entire Democratic party … just a fraction of it.
I do think more blacks will eventually move toward the republican party because they align themselves with many of their core beliefs (religion, gay marriage, etc.) People need to do what is right for themself.
Again though ... what is all this pre-occupation with the blacks this and the blacks that? Are you just as concerned about the political flow of all the other ethnic groups in the United States?
I wonder which political party the Native Americans will follow in the next election? Hmmm ... can anyone guess which political party the people of German heritage will follow? | |
|
| Steele new leader of the RNC, how do you feel about that? Limbaugh most influential republican? Posted: 2/6/2009 8:32:28 PM | I wouldn't call it a splinter of the party it was more like most of the democratic party itself dating back to its formation in 1792.
The Democratic Party was formed in 1792, when supporters of Thomas Jefferson began using the name Republicans, or Jeffersonian Republicans, to emphasize its anti-aristocratic policies. It adopted its present name during the Presidency of Andrew Jackson in the 1830s. In the 1840s and '50s, the party was in conflict over extending slavery to the Western territories. Southern Democrats insisted on protecting slavery in all the territories while many Northern Democrats resisted. The party split over the slavery issue in 1860 at its Presidential convention in Charleston, South Carolina. Northern Democrats nominated Stephen Douglas as their candidate, and Southern Democrats adopted a pro-slavery platform and nominated John C. Breckinridge in an election campaign that would be won by Abraham Lincoln and the newly formed Republican Party. After the Civil War, most white Southerners opposed Radical Reconstruction and the Republican Party's support of black civil and political rights.
The Democratic Party identified itself as the "white man's party" and demonized the Republican Party as being "Negro dominated," even though whites were in control. Determined to re-capture the South, Southern Democrats "redeemed" state after state -- sometimes peacefully, other times by fraud and violence. By 1877, when Reconstruction was officially over, the Democratic Party controlled every Southern state. The South remained a one-party region until the Civil Rights movement began in the 1960s. Northern Democrats, most of whom had prejudicial attitudes towards blacks, offered no challenge to the discriminatory policies of the Southern Democrats.
One of the consequences of the Democratic victories in the South was that many Southern Congressmen and Senators were almost automatically re-elected every election. Due to the importance of seniority in the U.S. Congress, Southerners were able to control most of the committees in both houses of Congress and kill any civil rights legislation. Even though Franklin Delano Roosevelt was a Democrat, and a relatively liberal president during the 1930s and '40s, he rarely challenged the powerfully entrenched Southern bloc. When the House passed a federal anti-lynching bill several times in the 1930s, Southern senators filibustered it to death.
-- Richard Wormser
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/jimcrow/stories_org_democratic.html | |
|
| Steele new leader of the RNC, how do you feel about that? Limbaugh most influential republican? Posted: 2/6/2009 8:58:10 PM |
The democratic party is not pure. They were once known as the dixiecrats … OP ... let's tell them the whole story. Actually, they were just a splinter party of the Democratic Party … not at all the entire party as is insinuated. ... it was more like half of the democratic party Since when is the "South" considered 1/2 of the United States?
I know you are from "The South" ... but believe me ... "The South" does not make up 1/2 of the United States. For certain, not in land mass. Also, the states that are being referred to as the "splinter" states ... were by far not those states that technically made up the "Rebel" states.
The point I was trying to make is that the "dixiecrats" were not the ENTIRE Democratic party. I'd say "dixie" pretty much indicates the "dixie" states ... that hints of just the south.
They were just a "splinter" party and not at all the "ENTIRE" Democratic party as was insinuated by the OP.
Besides ... my bigger concern is her obvious pre-occupation with the "blacks" this and the "blacks" that.
What's that all about all the time?
What about the other ethnic cultures in this country? | |
|
| Steele new leader of the RNC, how do you feel about that? Limbaugh most influential republican? Posted: 2/6/2009 9:01:33 PM |
Since when is the "South" considered 1/2 of the United States?
When? From 1792 to 1877.
I know you are from "The South"
For starters i'm not from the "South" i'm from the "North".
Since when does it make up most the democratic party?
How about this line..
Northern Democrats, most of whom had prejudicial attitudes towards blacks, offered no challenge to the discriminatory policies of the Southern Democrats.
| |
|