|
|
|
|
|
| Is the government making people lazy? Posted: 10/8/2009 12:39:46 PM | | Does easy access to welfare payments make people less inclined to look for work? Does the single parent pension provide an unintended incentive for women to just have kids and stay at home rather than look for work? Should taxpayers be obliged to provide a living for those who see the welfare system as nothing else but a way to bludge their way in life? Lots of loaded questions here, now let's see what kind of responses we get :) | |
|
| |
| Is the government making people lazy? Posted: 10/8/2009 2:01:48 PM | Subsidised welfare is the best recourse for imposed social class structure with the economic system we have. It is the benevolent government of capitalist tendencies to victimise the vulnerable, and even so it is a difficult battle to legislate effectively to govern economic cannibalism and social predation in our capitalist society, where it is far less an intrinsic element of culture as somewhere like the United States or presently the CIS and other 'developing' nations. Interestingly the nations with the highest government subsidy particularly in terms of welfare, although with comparable or higher taxation, also have the highest average standard of living, such as Switzerland (which is a democratic Parliamentary government in a socialist economy with varying subsidy between electoral terms). Also interestingly Switzerland is a world leader in mental health. | |
|
| Is the government making people lazy? Posted: 10/9/2009 6:52:35 PM | Yep....but im sure the lazy people would disagree.....its their right after all to be supported while sitting on their asses isnt it.....the world owes them...apparently. | |
|
| Is the government making people lazy? Posted: 10/10/2009 3:37:59 AM | welfare does provide the majority of citizens with "social security"...
and for most of us we don't have to put bars on our windows and high walls around our houses... and have rottys on guard for when we aren't home... ie.. at work/shopping/enjoying the outside world,.... as one consolation...
this country would turn into "mad max ville" if people who weren't/can't work weren't provided for at the most basic level in a rich society like ours... cheap/or free - bread, housing,grog,entertainment was the Roman norm to keep the great unwashed happy... times aren't that different...
masses of unhappy poor people being treated like shiite...have a habit of causing huge problems for Govs.... as the french kings found out.. people with nothing to lose are dangerous, en masse...
and what of our kids?... should we create a lower class of "slum dogs"? ... or have mothers turning their kids out onto the street to earn money however they can instead of going to school...perpetuating the problem...?... working for dodgy employers in sweatshops for a few bucks an hour.. take it or leave it... or starve?...
not a society I'd like to have develop here...
though, being a metal worker more bars,grilles and gates is more work for me... | |
|
| Is the government making people lazy? Posted: 10/10/2009 5:44:57 PM | | With all the disasters happening over-seas we are apparently suffering from 'compassion fatigue', so the obvious solution is to shoot all the lazy people...or better still, the film industry could use them as stunt doubles. | |
|
| Is the government making people lazy? Posted: 10/11/2009 2:37:36 AM | machines are making people lazy .... or reduntant.... that's for sure.. not governments..
there's a machine for the simplest of tasks these days....
for one example..imagine what it was like when the first back hoe arrived at the construction site.... .. and a generation of shovellors was out of work in their chosen field for ever... sorry boys.. no jobs today... to do what then ?.. for the interim and feed their families..? assuming all the existing jobs locally already had blokes doing them... beg for charity ?...
.... the back hoe owners didn't seem to care.... mhea.. go and get a job you bludgers...
leaves the government to offer some support.... if your government cares that is... | |
|
| Is the government making people lazy? Posted: 10/11/2009 3:32:37 AM | Ummmm ... whatever makes you think they are all lazy.
Have you been at home raising kids ??? And I am not talking about evasive parenting, I am talking about active, developmental parenting.
Some women work until they have their kids, wouldn't you know it, some are even professionals, that put their career on the back burner to be present in the most important initial years of the child.
So that society can't assert that yet another child was raised by those who put their career over their children. And you know what dammit ??? They paid enough taxes on their high salaries to warrant them making use of a facility that is otherwise abused by some of the people that may be lazy, or have difficulty in finding work, due to a lack of training.
Then on the other hand there are other types of benefits. Assistance that is offered to those that are in poor health, and are found unable to work due to either mental, emotional or physical constraints. These are certified ailments by a Medical Practitioner. But wait, the Medicos are doing it for their dollar ... but wait aren't they tied to the Government.
What would you do ??? Stone them all. Because they don't have your perspective.
Heaven forbid you become ill, or are taken by an unexpected event and need to reach out for assistance.
Just remember, karma is in force, and the power of attraction is in play.
Good luck with your whole perspective on this matter ... | |
|
| Is the government making people lazy? Posted: 10/11/2009 5:35:38 PM |
Ummmm ... whatever makes you think they are all lazy.
I didn't say that all welfare recipients are lazy. But I believe some people become lazy because it's just easier for them to get money from Centrelink than to go out and earn it.
What would you do ??? Stone them all. Because they don't have your perspective.
No. I ran out of stones so I'll just have to resort to expressing my opinions instead :)
Heaven forbid you become ill, or are taken by an unexpected event and need to reach out for assistance.
I never said I was against people asking for assistance when they genuinely need it - as long as they make an effort to get off welfare when they don't need to be helped any more.
Just remember, karma is in force, and the power of attraction is in play.
Karma isn't just for me. It's for you and everyone else :) Karma is not something to be feared when one asks legitimate questions. I certainly don't go around wishing that bad things happen to people on welfare. Maybe karma will take care of those who abuse the welfare system first, but it's not for me to decide who does and does not deserve to be punished - I'm not God :) | |
|
| Is the government making people lazy? Posted: 10/11/2009 6:55:03 PM | I recently found out I could have applied for government assistance after my husband died. I was quite surprised, although it's true that at that time I was too bereaved to work. That, combined with the time I didn't work so I could look after him in his terminal stages...I earned no money for about 7 months. Of course the bills didn't stop, plus all the costs when someone is so sick, and funeral costs and so on. And we hadn't had life insurance because we were young and bullet proof. But I guess my thoughts didn't turn towards "oh, the government will help me". My life, my problem...not really anyone else's responsibility, what happened to us. Luckily we had been somewhat responsible with our money and I had means of surviving, but apparently I still would have been eligible for assistance, despite that. In hindsight, some help would sure have been nice, eased the burden at that time, made it less stressful and scary...but I just didn't even consider that the government might help me let alone feel it was any kind of entitlement. Didn't even cross my mind. And yet, I have met others who immediately start talking government assistance, whatever the situation.
Sometimes I get the impression that "government money" is perceived as 'free money' from some faceless entity. I am not sure there is always much conscious thought given to where that money comes from. If 'the government' are giving you money, then what it all boils down to is...other people in the community are basically giving you some of their earnings. And not all of them are these filthy rich b@stards who deserve to be taxed out of existence. Most of them are struggling to build security for themselves and their kids, working some overtime only to find they are thrown into a higher tax bracket, paying tax on everything they earn, as well as on most things they buy, paying tax on anything they manage to earn from investing their untaxed income in an effort to get ahead. It's not 'free money', it came from someone else who also wants to survive in this world.
I can see there is a need for assistance in some situations, but I don't like to see attitudes of "entitlement" develop in people. I don't like to see people make comments that indicate an evolving sense of self-righteousness about being on the receiving end. I don't like to see people take advantage of the system, or who demand more more more despite really being quite OK. I don't like to see people expect to have everything handed to them, to expect to be able to opt out of the capitalist system and yet still gain all the perceived benefits of capitalism as those who go out and work. And sorry, but I think having kids, and staying home with kids is a choice, and every choice involves some degree of cost of lost opportunity...sacrifices. Some things are not choices, but rather things that happen to a person...marriage split ups or death of one parent that leave people struggling to raise kids already in existence...getting old (that's definitely not a choice)...being incapacitated and unable to work. There are certainly situations where people need help...but it is still help...not an entitlement.
Saw this thing on tele...a woman handing out cash to people in the street, not representing any company or promotion, just saying it was a random act of kindness... with a hidden camera watching their reactions. The reactions went from suspicion, to refusal, to gratitude, to comments that they thought it a lovely gesture and would pass it on to someone more in need. Some got quite emotional, and one woman got all teary about it. They all thought about it, reacted to it, ...experienced it...this being given money thing, from one person to another...not a faceless entity. Receiving from someone is an experience. I am not sure receiving money from 'the government' has any of that sense about it for some people. And, those paying taxes...do they see where there money is being given? I think sometimes the ones who are more seen are the ones rorting the system rather than the genuine ones who need and deserve help. I am not sure if the government is making people 'lazy' as such, but I get the sense the process of community helping some of its members in their time of need has been very dehumanised...going both ways. | |
|
| |
| Is the government making people lazy? Posted: 10/12/2009 4:29:48 AM | is that you Trent?.. .http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RjC-vh06_c...
Kevs' a sickooooo.. kev's got a big ****oooo.... .... all you need in Gov... | |
|
| Is the government making people lazy? Posted: 10/12/2009 5:59:15 AM |
And, those paying taxes...do they see where there money is being given? I think sometimes the ones who are more seen are the ones rorting the system rather than the genuine ones who need and deserve help. I am not sure if the government is making people 'lazy' as such, but I get the sense the process of community helping some of its members in their time of need has been very dehumanised...going both ways.
Good post.
I think that because people who have never, or rarely, had to survive on social benefits don't tend to meet many recipients of benefits, they can often gain a misconstrued view of them, because, as you said, the only information they get is of the ones rorting the system. Likewise' the welfare recipients quite often don't mix with those paying taxes and also base their opinions on hearsay. This division can easily lead to polarisation and an 'us and them' mentality. I believe personal experience, rather than watching 'A Current Affair', is a far better way to get an understanding, and form an opinion of people living in differant social and economic situations.
When my kids were younger I hung out with a lot of other single parents and other people on centrelink payments, and I'd have to say the vast majority of them were either completely incapable of working because illness or injury, or worked part time in paid or voluntary employment: I have a single parent friend who spent the time that her kids were at school, teaching prisoners non-violent behaviour and social skills, I knew another who sat on the then state advisory committee for social housing, and another who spent his spare time developing community gardening and farming projects, all voluntarily...so that's where some of our taxes are going. I also know a few people who run small businesses and donate a portion of their profits to charities. | |
|
| Is the government making people lazy? Posted: 10/12/2009 6:19:55 AM | Well balanced views as usual from Naamah and Julian. It is scary seeing just how much the government hands out on a daily basis and how is it administered. It must be 8 or more years ago that I saw figures that the DAILY social welfare payout was in the region of $370 million. I saw a budget pie chart and remember that welfare in some form or other is about 65% of the total budget for the country.
When you take into consideration the other things the Government pays for like medical, education and the Armed Forces and yet welfare more than doubles the lot of them together. So I spend my working life paying taxes for the benefit of others but then I'm told to stack away what little I have left in my own retirement fund because the cupboard may be bare when I get there. Not a great incentive. I don't begrudge those who need it but I strongly support a "work for benefits" scheme. A minimum 10 hours Voluntary work for those capable or they can pick up rubbish on the highways and along rail lines.
The other side of it is the admin of such handouts. I've been to Centrelink with friends and seen the "don't care" attitude of the people that work there. I have friends on disability (who do Volunteer work) who tell me of the constant run around, filling in forms, benefits cancelled, paperwork lost, constant changes to Case Managers. Again this is 65% (or more) of the total budget of the country and we have fools running it! How do "don't care" people inspire others to want to do anything? | |
|
| Is the government making people lazy? Posted: 10/12/2009 6:23:16 AM | here's a gauge I use in my local sunny coast area.. on the amount of guys goofing off and not working during the week...
go to the beach .... if there is any sort of surf running...
in the bad old 80's.. there would ALWAYS be guys surfing up and down the beaches if it was any good... not just the town breaks...
the last few years I've noticed if I get some days mid week to go down to the local break... and go up the beach a bit... there's usually no one....
plenty of holidaymakers walking, old crew walking dogs, some young mums and small kids, etc.... just a few local guys and learners surfing off the town breaks.....
for a place that's got twice as many people living here than in the 80's.... for the most part everyone seems to be working to some degree... or not surfing.. which is kinda odd... I shake my head and pinch myself out in the water some days, thinking where is everybody?.... it's going orfffffff!!!!!... | |
|
| Is the government making people lazy? Posted: 10/12/2009 6:37:02 AM | ^^^ Those are some scary figures Photoman. And how sad that the perceived answer to sustaining the balance is for us all to keep breeding simply to try to produce more taxpayers to support the outgoings, when our environment is struggling with population pressures as it is.
So I spend my working life paying taxes for the benefit of others but then I'm told to stack away what little I have left in my own retirement fund because the cupboard may be bare when I get there. Yes, I do find that very unpalatable myself.
I also would like to see a payment introduced for those who happen to have chosen to have children of other species. The cost of feed, vet bills...and do you know how much it costs to keep ducks in shoes??  | |
|
| Is the government making people lazy? Posted: 10/12/2009 7:03:52 AM | didn't the "great" kerry Packer ... australias richest "used to be" man...say
if you're paying tax.. you're an idiot.... or something of that nature... or you should be doing everything you can to avoid it....
so then... why should the "idiots" of Australia have to pay any tax either?... ..or are they the only ones left paying it?... ie.. all of us, GST,fuel, grog, ciggies,food,wages,stamp duties,....want to add one?...
there's more money to be saved from the top end of town... than the bottom....
the bottom is more acceptable to smack though... than a big head shot.. | |
|
| |
| Is the government making people lazy? Posted: 10/12/2009 7:50:54 AM | I got a special gift from Mr Rudd recently. It came at a really good time coz I was struggling to pay a few bills. I blessed and worshipped He that dropped money in my bank account from on high.
I have recreated the same circumstances that led to my first gift from above being attracted to my bank account, and yet... it does not come. It's like with drug dealers at a party... the first one's always free hey?
"Where is my money now, you B@stard!" I call out to the heavens, daily.
I feel like a cargo cult of one. A one member lult cult, you could say. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_cult | |
|
| Is the government making people lazy? Posted: 10/12/2009 8:25:23 AM | Message 17: So clearly you find it more acceptable to smack the middle class and wealthy? I guess that's feeding the "us and them" divide Jules directly referred to. Not sure what those on welfare would do without them though? Unless they don't really need the help?
"Suppose that every day 10 men go to a restaurant for dinner. The bill for all ten comes to $100. If it was paid the way we pay our taxes, the first four men would pay nothing; the fifth would pay $1; the sixth would pay $3; the seventh $7; the eighth $12; the ninth $18. The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59."
The 10 men ate dinner in the restaurant every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement until the restaurant owner threw them a curve. "Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily meal by $20."
Now dinner for the 10 only costs $80. The first four are unaffected. They still eat for free. The men had to figure out how to divvy up the $20 savings among the remaining six so that everyone gets his fair share. The men realize that $20 divided by 6 is $3.33, but if they subtract that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would end up being paid to eat their meal.
The restaurant owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same percentage, being sure to give each a break, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay. And so now the fifth man paid nothing, the sixth pitched in $2, the seventh paid $5, the eighth paid $9, the ninth paid $12, leaving the tenth man with a bill of $52 instead of $59.
Outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings. "I only got a dollar out of the $20 discount," complained the sixth man, pointing to the tenth, "and he got $7!"
"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got seven times more than me!"
"That's true," shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $7 back when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!"
"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor."
Then, the nine men surrounded the tenth man (the richest one, paying the most) and beat him up.
The next night the richest man didn't show up for dinner, so now the nine men sat down and ate without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They were $52 short.
And yeah yeah all of us pay GST, even those who also pay income tax and capital gains tax and tax on anything they try to put money into when they go without stuff in order to try to get ahead financially. I had to pay tax on behalf of my husband 6 months after he died (cos his work paid out his long service and holiday pay when it was realised he wasn't ever coming back to work), so gosh, I sure hope that helped someone doing it tough.
I try to maintain a balanced outlook, but it irks me when I see people trying to perpetuate the myth that all tax payers are Kerry Packers. There are everyday people with their own problems in life putting tax into the public purse, ya know, as well as paying GST. I really wish that face of the people was seen, because as I tried to say, there are people on both sides of this equation. Because to see the sort of stuff Photoman posted, and then see someone pooh pooh the idea that there might be cause for concern at the ratio we seem to have ended up with...and then bringing up Kerry Packer as if he somehow personifies 'taxpayers'...it's just an inaccurate representation of the reality I think. | |
|
| Is the government making people lazy? Posted: 10/12/2009 2:59:51 PM |
And how sad that the perceived answer to sustaining the balance is for us all to keep breeding simply to try to produce more taxpayers to support the outgoings, when our environment is struggling with population pressures as it is.
Makes me think of parents in some third world countries who continue having more and more children only to watch them starve, in the belief that more children equals more wealth. Humans are the same the world over.
And with Australia's aging population it seems the answers are not so easy to find. | |
|
| Is the government making people lazy? Posted: 10/12/2009 3:23:33 PM |
I saw a budget pie chart and remember that welfare in some form or other is about 65% of the total budget for the country.
Hmmm...not sure where you got those figures from but
Total welfare expenditure in 2005-06 was $90.2 billion, of which $61.3 billion (68%) was cash benefits and $28.9 billion (32%) benefits-in-kind (welfare services). Spending on welfare services in 2005-06 was 3.0% of GDP or $1,404 per person. http://www.aihw.gov.au/expenditure/faqs.cfm#welfare
You really should check things before you post, else you might add to the 'us and them' mentality.
Well balanced views as usual from Naamah and Julian. ...Just restoring balance to the universe.
Now I better go and earn some money...it's BAS time again | |
|
| Is the government making people lazy? Posted: 10/12/2009 6:05:28 PM |
I saw a budget pie chart and remember that welfare in some form or other is about 65% of the total budget for the country. then
Spending on welfare services in 2005-06 was 3.0% That's a massive difference, and Julian's quoted figures are far more reassuring. Personally I feel quite relieved after reading that. Imagining myself endlessly running on a treadmill in an unsustainable machine is really stressful as a mental image.
Any comment from any passing Super-Economists?
Actually a passing Super-Economist emailed me something from the ATO last night, regarding those who are contributing to the tax dollars, to demonstrate that any impression that aaaaaall the money is coming from the rich b@stards is not realistic and just more of the 'us and them' mentality.
46.2 per cent of the tax burden is paid by those earning in the $25,001 to $75,000 income range, which is 63.7 per cent of taxpayers.
So as I said before, there are real, everyday humans, with their own struggles and difficulties, who are putting into the purse, just like there are real, everyday humans receiving help. It'd be nice to see respect and compassion going both ways....an understanding by those receiving that someone else is doing without in their own lives in order to help and therefore gratitude would not be inappropriate... and an understanding by those paying that there are more genuine situations quietly going on where help is needed than just the rorters that hit the media and therefore graciousness would not be inappropriate. The faceless entity in the middle is merely the administrator of the community helping those members who are in a time of need. If only the two sides could get a real visual on each other without all the propaganda. | |
|
| Is the government making people lazy? Posted: 10/12/2009 8:09:38 PM | Sorry, I am too late to edit this in ^^^ but with regards to the stuff Jules and Photoman are focussing on...
Government revenues
Direct taxes * $142 billion (includes personal income tax $98.7 billion, company tax $36.3 billion)
Indirect taxes * $27.6 billion (includes customs duties $5.6 billion, fuel excise $13.5 billion)
Total income $187.6 billion
Government expenses The government spends money on many things but the major expenses are for a few departments with big programs. These include:
* Twice a year, the Parliament scrutinises how the government has spent these funds. * Defence $12.9 billion * Education $13.3 billion * Health $31.7 billion * Social Security $80.1 billion
Parliamentary Education Office http://74.125.153.132/search?q=cache:Vam1Ft-bHM8J:www.peo.gov.au/students/fss/fss53.html+how+much+is+spent+on+social+security+in+australia&cd=10&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=au
So, doesn't that work out to be about 43% of the gross revenue being spent on social security?? (80.1 billion as a percentage of the 187.6 billion)
Now I am really confused.
These figures are for 2003-2004, the year before the figures Jules is citing, and yet they are closer to reflecting what Photoman was saying he remembers than what Jules found. And they show we spend waaay more on welfare than on health or education, just like he said. So now with Julian's figures I am finding it hard to believe that if there would be such a difference from one year to the next, and it seems to me that perhaps I am not reading that 3% Jules mentioned correctly. It dawned on me after I posted last time that it does say 'welfare services', and they had already distinguished with the cash payments...so I am thinking these are breakdowns of something rather than simplistic gross stats??? and that other breakdowns have been omitted??? So now I don't think what I understood Jules' post to mean was right, and it seems? as if Photoman was closer to the mark.
I would really appreciate it if someone with knowledge about this stuff could please clarify...what are we, as a country, spending on welfare/social security? | |
|
| Is the government making people lazy? Posted: 10/12/2009 8:21:27 PM | Makes me think of parents in some third world countries who continue having more and more children only to watch them starve, in the belief that more children equals more wealth. Humans are the same the world over.
Far too simplistic especially from you. There is precious little to no access to contraceptive in many of these countries, terminations if acceptable are backstreet and dangerous. ANd in farming subsitance communities absolutely more children equals wealth aka realistically food cos more hands to work the land. Included in this is the high infant mortality rate.
Naamah...wish I could help you on this one. But would suggest that the 80 odd billion also incorporates, disability pensions, low income earners, (thank god some people do clean our public toilets, streets etc) Austudy, old aged pensioners (more especially now some have lost their entire private retirement funds). I consider maybe that just like the hospitals that include people who die of natural causes and put them in the category of having left the hospital successfully (ie...not killed by malpractise) that so too with the amount mooted is somewhat misleading, possibly inflammatory. But then I do english not maths and I do humanity not capitalism. | |
|
|
|