|
|
|
|
|
| Why didn't the US Army go after Bin Laden Posted: 10/25/2004 2:01:47 PM | The command and control of the Tora Bora operations remained in the hands of the US military and a large number of US troops and aircraft participated in the battle and suffered casualties. However, the US troops did not raid the caves. They made the Afghans do it. They avoided a frontal confrontation with al-Qaeda.
In war soliders die. it's sad but thats what war is all about....killing human beings why didn't Commander and Chief George Bush order US troops to go after Bin Laden. Why did he leave the business to Afgan warlords and drug dealers Why is Bin Laden still at large ?
Seems a lot like what he did in the Texas Air National Gaurd. George seemed to enjoy the benefits of being American, he just didn't want to fight for them, let some else do that.
Maybe it was Chaney, no problems making money from the good ole US of A, but defend her Dick had other "Priorities" | |
|
| Why didn't the US Army go after Bin Laden Posted: 10/25/2004 3:18:11 PM | | paddler, Hi ! ENEMY PAWN bin Laden. Guys like him are ARAB OIL CELL LIGHTENING RODS. They MUST be used to ferret out threats to the British Petroleum BCT oil pipeline that will shut down what the US military refers to as RAG HEAD OIL. BAKU... The NAZI's tried. The Russians tried. Now the US and UK and Red Chinese are trying to control the Monster of the Caspian Sea-- the oil at Baku... This time the effort will succeed at least to the extent that a military road for the PLA ChiCom's, and Maygog, Tubal, and Rosh is built leading to the Levant and following the Old Silk Routes. Russia and the Chinese ChiCom's know THEIR time is short. The Earth's core is shifting and magnetic north is accelerating toward Siberia at 40 miles per year and picking up speed. Soon their homelands will be OPEN to the SOLAR WIND and Particle radiation. Where's my SUN SCREEN ! LOL ! | |
|
| |
| Why didn't the US Army go after Bin Laden Posted: 10/27/2004 2:11:30 AM | The reason The US Army did not go after Osama Bin Foolin you,is because he died 3 years before 911 ever happened...(-;
Now if you want the master mind of 911???
You will find him in Kinny Bunkport Mane and his last name also start's with the letter " B " ...(-;
Go findem Sherlock...(-; | |
|
yna6
| Joined: 5/2/2004 Msg: 5 | |
| Why didn't the US Army go after Bin Laden Posted: 10/29/2004 12:48:48 AM | | Cause Binny and the boys are locked up in some cave complex, and getting their beards longer and whiter. Hopefully they will stay under their rock (LOL....oh man, I mean this literally! LOL!) and not bother coming out. | |
|
| Why didn't the US Army go after Bin Laden Posted: 10/29/2004 1:28:02 AM | yna6, yes--this smacks of some truth. Like Noriega and JUST CAUSE...
You can sing this to Garyowen:
We're drivin' through your neighborhood ! We're drivin' hard we're drivin' Good ! Just like MR. Rigers said we should !
HELLO NEIGHBOR ! IT's A WONDERFUL DAY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD !
Well, Noreiga's locked up real tight ! I guess that's just his legal right ! O'Noriega locked up real tight ! I guess that's just his legal RIGHT! | |
|
| |
| |
| Why didn't the US Army go after Bin Laden Posted: 3/17/2007 12:17:05 PM | It's quite simple actually. Bin Laden was smart enough to move himself into a region where he had a back door into Pakistan. With his friends in the Pakistani intelligence service (including the head of it at that time, who thought Bin Laden was actually a great guy, and that Mossad had actually been behind 9/11) , those same people that had been the conduit for CIA cash to Bin Laden during the Russian occcupation, he probably had about as much intel on what was going on as any US field commander.
The border between the two countries is rather porous, and difficult to control. The back door to Afghanistan was guarded by his friends, and not his enemies.
Once across that border, he was well protected by the Pakistani government. By going into the tribal regions, they could wring their hands and say "So sorry". You can bet your bottom ruppee that, were Bin Laden to be a threat against the Pakistani state, he would have assumed room temperature years ago.
Don't forget that the name of the country is The Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Don't forget that the Saudis gave the Pakistanis a billion or so for the Islamic bomb. Don't forget that Bin Laden is also appreciated by a great number of extremist arabs.
Saddam was too, and that's based in the entire culture of the modern arab world. Someone who stands up to the West, even if a madman, will be respected simply because of their courage to do so.
Tribal connections are paramount, in a way the West cannot understand. Turning over Bin Laden would be seen by many in the Arab world as being an act of treachery, especially to the Saudis. Remember, Bin Laden's family is well connected to the Saudi Royal family.
Pakistan is hard enough to run as it is. The political outrage of the extremists over such a move would topple the government violently within months.
Look at how the Taliban are also allowed to regroup inside Pakistan's borders. That's not an accident either.
As such, Bin Laden is in the perfect place. American forces cannot come and get him, and the Pakistanis won't. I'm pretty sure that at least the top people in the Pakistani security community know exactly where he is. | |
|
| Why didn't the US Army go after Bin Laden Posted: 3/17/2007 12:22:52 PM | | I will have to agree with some of that, but im sure we will get the **stard evetuly, as for the taliban..... they wont last long,, i hope lol | |
|
| Why didn't the US Army go after Bin Laden Posted: 3/17/2007 1:17:57 PM | You want a good possible way to get Bin Laden ?
Ask the Indians if they would contribute a rather large military force, and station them on the Afghani border next to Pakistan. You want to see the Pakistanis suddenly have a heart attack ?
You'd probably get him handed over in a week. | |
|
| Why didn't the US Army go after Bin Laden Posted: 3/17/2007 1:34:53 PM | | A group called The Shadow Wolves made up from Navajo,Sioux,Lakota,Apache,have been sent to Afghan border region to teach the local units the traditional mathod called "cutting sign" so they can track and find these terrorists ,should of brought them in long time ago. | |
|
| Why didn't the US Army go after Bin Laden Posted: 3/17/2007 10:36:56 PM | three theories surround bin laden..
1) he is alive and well in the tribal areas of pakistan 2) he was wounded and eventually died in tora bora 3) he is in some other country...
What makes more sense? ..he is alive and well in the tribal areas of pakistan what makes a terrorist invisible to the world...sanctuary...and support In that area he has sanctuary, support...
The problem lies in one problem..logistics and how to root him out...
Do I think he will ever be captured...nope... | |
|
| Why didn't the US Army go after Bin Laden Posted: 3/18/2007 9:14:59 AM | | If the us had caught bin laden then bush wouldn't of had an excuse to invade iraq. Also he's bush's buddy, cia trained, and who can say he is still not working for the americans. | |
|
| Why didn't the US Army go after Bin Laden Posted: 3/18/2007 9:40:46 AM | Naw, they didn't go after Bin Laden, because they figured all the forum people here would find him. Sure enough, the CIA couldn't do it, the FBI couldn't do it, the special forces couldn't do it, but I'll be damned, The people on here like Montreal guy figured out where he is, and knows how to get him.....
LOL....... Freakin Genius...........LOL......... | |
|
| Why didn't the US Army go after Bin Laden Posted: 3/18/2007 10:02:23 AM | Because even Cheney couldn't bluff his way through an attack on Camp David. Well, maybe.
I'm not suggesting that the Bush administration was complicit in the 9-11 attacks, but they certainly took full advantage of the situation.
Likewise, they took advantage of bin Laden as their "poster boy" for terror, providing a focal point on which to launch their "war on terror". Perhaps they gave us Americans just enough credit, in coming to the conclusion that we wouldn't support a war on a concept or strategy, but would go to war against people - even if they were not a nation state. Wiping out the poster boy would have been a bad strategic move from the agency's point of view; not the C.I.A., but Hill & Knowlton.
Speaking of wars "on" things ... wasn't destroying the Taliban a brilliant move ... allowing, as it did, the return of opium production, thus helping to sustain the "war on drugs"? It's a "war on" two-fer, baby! | |
|
| Why didn't the US Army go after Bin Laden Posted: 3/18/2007 10:20:15 AM |
The people on here like Montreal guy figured out where he is, and knows how to get him.....
10/03/2007
Last week, Adml Mike McConnell, the new US Director of National Intelligence, told a Senate committee that bin Laden, who turns 50 tomorrow, is in Pakistan and actively re-establishing al-Qa'eda training camps there.
It was the most specific information about bin Laden given by a US official for several years and prompted speculation that surveillance photographs of the al-Qa'eda leader or his deputy might have been obtained.
Adml McConnell said of the Pakistani tribal area that "to the best of our knowledge the senior leadership, Number One and Number Two, are there, and they are attempting to re-establish and rebuild and to establish training camps."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/09/wladen09.xml
Seems that reading and research isn't a bad thing now , after all.
Are you familiar with a man called Abu Zubaydah ?
Zayn al-Abidin Muhammed Husayn Abu Zubaydah is a Palestinian long believed to be one of Osama bin Laden's top lieutenants. Experts think Abu Zubaydah became al-Qaeda's chief of military operations after Muhammed Atef was killed in a U.S. bombing raid on Afghanistan in Nov. 2001. Early in 2002, intelligence experts said Abu Zubaydah was reorganizing the far-flung remnants of the al-Qaeda network to plan further terrorist actions. He is suspected of helping plan a wave of incidents that was to have taken place after Sept. 11, 2001, including attacks on the American embassies in Paris and Sarajevo.
Abu Zubaydah has a long history of involvement with al-Qaeda. In 1999, a Jordanian military court sentenced Abu Zubaydah in absentia to death for plotting to attack tourist sites in Jordan around the millennium.
Abu Zubaydah also organized terrorist attacks on the millennium celebrations in the Los Angeles in Dec. 1999, according Ahmed Ressam, an Algerian convicted of involvement in that plan. During his trial Ressam also said Abu Zubaydah directed Afghan terrorist camps and recruitment for al-Qaeda. Ressam indicated that Abu Zubaydah told him to obtain Canadian passports so others could carry out attacks against the U.S.
Assumed to travel widely to work with al-Qaeda terrorist cells, Abu Zubaydah has a light complexion and apparently enjoys considerable success assuming false identities and moving from country to country undetected. He is likely one of the few people who knows the identities of thousands of al-Qaeda soldiers trained in Afghanistan.
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0900557.html
That's a pretty good terrorist pedigree, if I say so myself. Funny thing happened when he was captured in Faisalabad, Pakistan in 2002, and it will back up what I was saying as per Bin Laden.
Posner elaborates in startling detail how U.S. interrogators used drugs—an unnamed "quick-on, quick-off" painkiller and Sodium Pentothal, the old movie truth serum—in a chemical version of reward and punishment to make Zubaydah talk. When questioning stalled, according to Posner, cia men flew Zubaydah to an Afghan complex fitted out as a fake Saudi jail chamber, where "two Arab-Americans, now with Special Forces," pretending to be Saudi inquisitors, used drugs and threats to scare him into more confessions.
Yet when Zubaydah was confronted by the false Saudis, writes Posner, "his reaction was not fear, but utter relief." Happy to see them, he reeled off telephone numbers for a senior member of the royal family who would, said Zubaydah, "tell you what to do." The man at the other end would be Prince Ahmed bin Salman bin Abdul Aziz, a Westernized nephew of King Fahd's and a publisher better known as a racehorse? owner. His horse War Emblem won the Kentucky Derby in 2002. To the amazement of the U.S., the numbers proved valid. When the fake inquisitors accused Zubaydah of lying, he responded with a 10-minute monologue laying out the Saudi-Pakistani-bin Laden triangle.
Zubaydah, writes Posner, said the Saudi connection ran through Prince Turki al-Faisal bin Abdul Aziz, the kingdom's longtime intelligence chief. Zubaydah said bin Laden "personally" told him of a 1991 meeting at which Turki agreed to let bin Laden leave Saudi Arabia and to provide him with secret funds as long as al-Qaeda refrained from promoting jihad in the kingdom. The Pakistani contact, high-ranking air force officer Mushaf Ali Mir, entered the equation, Zubaydah said, at a 1996 meeting in Pakistan also attended by Zubaydah. Bin Laden struck a deal with Mir, then in the military but tied closely to Islamists in Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (isi), to get protection, arms and supplies for al-Qaeda. Zubaydah told interrogators bin Laden said the arrangement was "blessed by the Saudis."
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101030908-480226,00.html
If this lower level fellow is that confident about Saudi protection, imagine how bullet proof Bin Laden must feel ?
Even stranger ?
Those three Saudi princes all perished within days of one another. On July 22, 2002, Prince Ahmed was felled by a heart attack at age 43. One day later Prince Sultan bin Faisal bin Turki al-Saud, 41, was killed in what was called a high-speed car accident. The last member of the trio, Prince Fahd bin Turki bin Saud al-Kabir, officially "died of thirst" while traveling east of Riyadh one week later. And seven months after that, Mushaf Ali Mir, by then Pakistan's Air Marshal, perished in a plane crash in clear weather over the unruly North-West Frontier province, along with his wife and closest confidants.
Without charging any skulduggery (Posner told TIME they "may in fact be coincidences"), the author notes that these deaths occurred after cia officials passed along Zubaydah's accusations to Riyadh and Islamabad.
- Ibid
Three men, all named by this insider, who all conveniently die shortly afterwards at rather young ages. It seems some secrets are worth killing for.
As for Pakistani Intelligence ?
Updated: 10:30 a.m. CT Feb 28, 2007 ISLAMABAD, Pakistan - Pakistan on Wednesday rejected a claim by the U.S. intelligence chief that Osama bin Laden and his deputy were hiding in northwestern Pakistan, and that al-Qaida was setting up camps near the Afghan border.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17380397
The guy that was HEAD of the Inter Services Intelligence Directorate at the time Bin Laden "vanished" into thin air - and CERTAINLY NOT PAKISTAN ?
Here he is talking to a journalist, shortly after 9/11 happened. Remember this is the guy RUNNING the show in Pakistan, in regards to "tracking him down".
De Borchgrave: So who did Black Sept. 11?
Gul: Mossad and its accomplices. The U.S. spends $40 billion a year on its 11 intelligence agencies. That's $400 billion in 10 years. Yet the Bush Administration says it was taken by surprise. I don't believe it. Within 10 minutes of the second twin tower being hit in the World Trade Center... CNN said Osama bin Laden had done it. That was a planned piece of disinformation by the real perpetrators. It created an instant mindset and put public opinion into a trance, which prevented even intelligent people from thinking for themselves.
Q: So you're already convinced bin Laden didn't do it?
A: I know bin Laden and his associates. I've been with them here, in Europe and the Middle East. They are graduates of the best universities and are highly intelligent with impressive degrees and speak impeccable English. These are people who have rediscovered fundamental Islamic values. Many come from the Gulf countries where ruling royal families have generated hatred by the way they flout divine law, wasting billions on gratifying their whims, jetting around in large private jets by themselves, and sailing the Mediterranean in big private boats for weeks on end. Osama's best recruits come from feudal areas that are U.S. protectorates and where millions of poor people are seeking human dignity. I have even visited a Christian convent school in Murree, 60 miles from here, where my 13-year-old daughter is studying. The young girls there have told me Osama is their hero. Osama's followers identify with Mujahideen freedom fighters wherever they are defending Islam and its values.
Q: So what makes you think Osama wasn't behind Sept. 11?
A: From a cave inside a mountain or a peasant's hovel? Let's be serious. Osama inspires countless millions by standing up for Islam against American and Israeli imperialism. He doesn't have the means for such a sophisticated operation.
No wonder they can't find him, because they are looking in every synagogue.
"Binny's a GREAT guy....really.....completely misunderstood. "
With friends like this, you don't need enemies.
Osama bin Laden's principal Pakistani adviser before Sept. 11, 2001, was retired Gen. Hamid Gul, a former ISI chief who, since the 2001 attacks, is "strategic adviser" to the coalition of six politico-religious parties that governs two of Pakistan's four provinces. Known as MMA, the coalition also occupies 20 percent of the seats in the federal assembly in Islamabad.
Hours after Sept. 11, Gen. Gul publicly accused Israel's Mossad of fomenting the plot. Later, he said the U.S. Air Force must have been in on it since no warplanes were scrambled to shoot down the hijacked airliners.
Gen. Gul spent two weeks in Afghanistan immediately before Sept. 11. He denied meeting bin Laden on that trip, but has always said he was an "admirer" of the al-Qaida leader. However, he did meet several times with Mullah Mohammed Omar, the Taliban leader.
Since Sept. 11, hardly a week goes by without Gen. Gul denouncing the United States in both the Urdu and English-language media.
In a conversation with this reporter in October 2001, Gen. Gul forecast a future Islamist nuclear power that would form a greater Islamic state with a fundamentalist Saudi Arabia after the monarchy falls.
A ranking CIA official, speaking anonymously, said the agency considered Gen. Gul "the most dangerous man" in Pakistan. A senior Pakistani political leader, also on condition of anonymity, said, "I have reason to believe Hamid Gul was Osama bin Laden's master planner."
The report received by the Sept. 11 Commission from the anonymous, well-connected Pakistani source, said: "The core issue of instability and violence in South Asia is the character, activities and persistence of the militarized Islamist fundamentalist state in Pakistan. No cure for this canker can be arrived at through any strategy of negotiations, support and financial aid to the military regime, or by a 'regulated' transition to 'democracy.'"
The confidential report continued: "The imprints of every major act of international Islamist terrorism invariably passes through Pakistan, right from September 11 — where virtually all the participants had trained, resided or met in, coordinated with, or received funding from or through Pakistan — to major acts of terrorism across South Asia and Southeast Asia, as well as major networks of terror that have been discovered in Europe.
"Pakistan has made a big case out of the fact that some of the top-line leadership of al Qaeda has been arrested in the country with the 'cooperation' of the Pakistani security forces and intelligence. However, the fact is that each such arrest only took place after the FBI and U.S. investigators had effectively gathered evidence to force Pakistani collaboration, but little of this evidence had come from Pakistani intelligence agencies. Indeed, ISI has consistently sought to deny the presence of al Qaeda elements in Pakistan, and to mislead U.S. investigators. ... This deception has been at the very highest level, and Musharraf himself, for instance, initially insisted he was 'certain' bin Laden was dead. ...
"ISI has been actively facilitating the relocation of the al Qaeda from Afghanistan to Pakistan, and the conspiracy of substantial segments of serving Army and intelligence officers is visible. ..."
"The Pakistan army consistently denies giving the militants anything more than moral, diplomatic and political support. The reality is quite different. ISI issues money and directions to militant groups, specially the Arab hijackers of September 11 from al Qaeda. ISI was fully involved in devising and helping the entire affair. And that is why people like Hamid Gul and others very quickly stated the propaganda that CIA and Mossad did it. ..."
"The dilemma for Musharraf is that many of his army officers are still deeply sympathetic to al Qaeda, Taliban militants and the Kashmir cause. ... Many retired and present ISI officers retain close links to al Qaeda militants hiding in various state-sponsored places in Pakistan and Kashmir as well as leaders from the defeated Taliban regime. They regard the fight against Americans and Jews and Indians in different parts of the world as legitimate jihad."
The report also says, "According to a senior tribal leader in Peshawar, bin Laden, who suffers from renal deficiency, has been periodically undergoing dialysis in a Peshawar military hospital with the knowledge and approval of ISI if not of Gen. Pervez Musharraf himself."
http://www.worldthreats.com/Asia/Pakistan's%20ISI%20Involved%20in%209-11.htm
So, after this little read, you still think Bin Laden's NOT in Pakistan ? | |
|
| Why didn't the US Army go after Bin Laden Posted: 3/18/2007 6:53:43 PM | | I have no idea where Osama Bin Ladin is. I don't know for sure why we did not go after him but my best guess is that he is way too valuable as a boogie man for the current administration. As long as he is free, we have a devil to hate. | |
|
| Why didn't the US Army go after Bin Laden Posted: 3/18/2007 7:34:52 PM |
The command and control of the Tora Bora operations remained in the hands of the US military and a large number of US troops and aircraft participated in the battle and suffered casualties. However, the US troops did not raid the caves. They made the Afghans do it. They avoided a frontal confrontation with al-Qaeda.
Actually there were not that many American troops in Afghanistan at anytime before the actual collapse of the country. This war was fought with mostly special operations and less than the equivalent of a division of more conventional troops of the army and marines. At Tora Bora all Bin Ladin had to do to escape was to bribe one of the Afghans working as our ally. In a country where loyalty changes quite frequently, it was foolish to think the local warlords would strongly support us.
Many in the military wanted more troops to have greater operational flexibility but were over ruled by Rumsfeld. The same mistake he would make a year later in the ramp up to the invasion of Iraq. | |
|
| Why didn't the US Army go after Bin Laden Posted: 3/18/2007 8:03:07 PM | | That's an easy answer....because he was never really after Bin Laden anyways. It was all about controlling the oil. Most countries outside of USA realize this and don't look to highly on it. If he had utilized the time he spent chasing Saddam into finding Bin Laden, the REAL danger would have been put out of his misery by now. But it was never about that in the first place... | |
|
| Why didn't the US Army go after Bin Laden Posted: 3/19/2007 10:49:03 AM | | Because there isn't enough money in it. Do a search about retired Marine General Smedley Butler, recipient of two Congressional Medals of Honor, who explains clearly (based on his own experience) that the U.S. military are "musclemen for big business." He nailed it before World War II, and it's even worse now. | |
|
| Why didn't the US Army go after Bin Laden Posted: 3/19/2007 11:02:02 AM | the invasion of AFghanistan was influenced by our last war - the Gulf War. The Gulf War was the perfect stage for a classic army with superior equipment - flat terrain - no where to hide. because of our equipment superiority, including smart bombs and night vision, we blasted a large army with virtually no casualities - most of our casualities were from inadvertant friendly fire.
Fast forward to Afghanistan - we wanted the same thing - a clean war with few American deaths - it didnt work. | |
|
| Why didn't the US Army go after Bin Laden Posted: 3/20/2007 1:09:34 PM | | oil oil oil oil oil oil oil but seriously this is much deeper and politically motivated than we are being led to believe by the worlds Media! Someone is getting mighty rich from this fight on terror Mr B**h. | |
|
| Why didn't the US Army go after Bin Laden Posted: 3/20/2007 2:08:08 PM |
because of our equipment superiority, including smart bombs and night vision, we blasted a large army with virtually no casualities - most of our casualities were from inadvertant friendly fire.
Nice fantasy world you have there.... | |
|
| Why didn't the US Army go after Bin Laden Posted: 3/21/2007 10:06:48 AM | paddler said: The command and control of the Tora Bora operations remained in the hands of the US military and a large number of US troops and aircraft participated in the battle and suffered casualties. However, the US troops did not raid the caves. They made the Afghans do it. They avoided a frontal confrontation with al-Qaeda.
That isn't what happened.
The British Special Forces (the SAS who are often regarded as the best special forces unit in the world) were at Tora Bora and engaged the Taliban right down to hand-to-hand combat in the caves. The figured out where Bin Laden was in the cave complex and called in reinforcements. At that point they were told that, for political reasons, it had to be the Americans who captured him and that they should hold back. More SAS troopers could have been on the ground within the hour but the ones already there were told to hold off so that Americans could come in...and it took the Americans several days (four if I rememebr correctly) to get any forces on the ground (the American military has a long history of screwing things up because of over-planning, rather than just keeping things as simple as possible...Operation Eagle Claw is a prime example). The Brits could have had him but the Yanks screwed up. | |
|
|
| Page 1 of 5
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 |
|