online dating service

Free Dating Site    

REGISTER | MAIL/PROFILE | HELP | NOW ONLINE | SEARCH | RATING | FORUMS | SUCCESS STORIES
Plentyoffish dating forums are a place to meet singles and get dating advice or share dating experiences etc. Hopefully you will all have fun meeting singles and try out this online dating thing... Remember that we are the largest 100% free online dating service, so you will never have to pay a dime to meet your soulmate.
     
Show ALL Forums  > Politics  > Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Pro      Mod Threads Home login  
Page 1 of 2 1, 2
 Author Thread: Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
 SoTexMan

Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 1
view profile
History
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 8:03:19 AM
Hey, all:

Big Pharma member Merck hired the former Chief of Staff for Texas Gov. Rick "GoodHair" Perry as a lobbyist, doubled their lobbying budget for the state, and between them and the lobbyist and the increased budget, got GoodHair to sign an executive order requiring all 6th grade girls in Texas to receive the Gardasil HPV vaccination. There was no debate, no legislation, both of which being odder still since the Texas State Legislature is in session right now. Apparently Merck had tried the usual legislative route in 3 other states but failed. The Texas deal may mean $60 million in sales in Texas alone (~$200 per shot), so the motive of greed is clear, as is the effectiveness of the lobbying effort.

This is not about the medical/health value of the vaccination, although that is worth a thread itself, this is about the politics of elected officials doing deals with businesses at the expense of public debate, and with no apparent concern for the public will. It is about the corporate oligarchy that in fact is in charge of government. It is about elected officials and corporations circumventing the legislative process for greed. This is about the conflict of interest of a former staffer turning around and working as a lobbyist.

Merck has apparently increased their lobbying efforts in other U.S. states. Have they done so in Canadian provinces? Isn't it time to change the policy of allowing corporations to run the world? Does the corporate oligarchy concern you?

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 rev0218

Joined: 3/6/2006
Msg: 2
view profile
History
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 8:10:55 AM
I thought that a strange position for a self proclaimed conservative Texas governor to take. What ex chief of staff? If it is who I think it is, I can illuminate on this one a bit.
 cotter

Joined: 10/17/2005
Msg: 3
view profile
History
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 8:18:46 AM

... between them and the lobbyist and the increased budget, got GoodHair to sign an executive order requiring all 6th grade girls in Texas to receive the Gardisil HPV vaccination.
Well it seems to me if GoodHair is getting a kickback ... then someone needs to go after him.

I don't know anything about Texas law, but can't someone start a petition to request that it be put up for a vote? What about civil rights? ACLU might enjoy going after this one.
 Sombient

Joined: 9/29/2006
Msg: 4
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 8:58:40 AM
An executive order can only mandate that an HPV vaccine must be administered.

GlaxoSmithKline has sought approval in the United States for a similar preventive HPV vaccine, known as Cervarix. In the European Union, GlaxoSmithKline filed the application for approval in March 2006.

GlaxoSmithKline will likely file an objection if the State chooses to use only one vaccine; I'm pretty sure the decision requiring mandatory vaccination will also be challenged as well on principle of parental rights as primary custodians of their children's health, by conservative family rights groups.
 gtadaizee

Joined: 10/22/2006
Msg: 5
view profile
History
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 9:17:25 AM
I intensely dislike lobbyist and their backers. They take the people out of the equation and then it is only money speaking. The lobbyists spread money around very freely. I just don't know what to say re any enforced vaccinations. Small numbers of people react very badly and usually suffer severe permanent brain damage at a young age and vacs seem to benefit the masses. BUT those small numbers are still people! I think it should be a paarent or guardians choice NOT forced and YET education is needed to teach people the reasons behind any kinds of meds. Too bad the lobbyists didn't set up educational sessions at the people's levels instead of lining pockets of gold and silver! HATE LOBBYISTS!
 SoTexMan

Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 6
view profile
History
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 9:19:11 AM
Hey, all:

Here is the news report from the major Austin TX newspaper:

http://www.statesman.com/search/content/gen/ap/Cervical_Cancer.html


Texas governor orders anti-cancer vaccine for schoolgirls
By LIZ AUSTIN PETERSON
Associated Press Writer

AUSTIN, Texas — Bypassing the Legislature altogether, Republican Gov. Rick Perry issued an order Friday making Texas the first state to require that schoolgirls get vaccinated against the sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer.

By employing an executive order, Perry sidestepped opposition in the Legislature from conservatives and parents' rights groups who fear such a requirement would condone premarital sex and interfere with the way Texans raise their children.

Beginning in September 2008, girls entering the sixth grade — meaning, generally, girls ages 11 and 12 — will have to receive Gardasil, Merck & Co.'s new vaccine against strains of the human papillomavirus, or HPV.

Perry also directed state health authorities to make the vaccine available free to girls 9 to 18 who are uninsured, enrolled in Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program or whose insurance does not cover vaccines. In addition, he ordered that Medicaid offer Gardasil to women ages 19 to 21.

Perry, a conservative Christian who opposes abortion and stem-cell research using embryonic cells, counts on the religious right for his political base. But he has said the cervical cancer vaccine is no different from the one that protects children against polio.

"The HPV vaccine provides us with an incredible opportunity to effectively target and prevent cervical cancer," Perry said.

Merck is bankrolling efforts to pass state laws across the country mandating Gardasil for girls as young as 11 or 12. It doubled its lobbying budget in Texas and has funneled money through Women in Government, an advocacy group made up of female state legislators around the country.

Perry has ties to Merck and Women in Government. One of the drug company's three lobbyists in Texas is Mike Toomey, Perry's former chief of staff. His current chief of staff's mother-in-law, Texas Republican state Rep. Dianne White Delisi, is a state director for Women in Government.

The governor also received $6,000 from Merck's political action committee during his re-election campaign.


The order is effective until Perry or a successor changes it, and the Legislature has no authority to repeal it, said Perry spokeswoman Krista Moody. Moody said the Texas Constitution permits the governor, as head of the executive branch, to order other members of the executive branch to adopt rules like this one.

But opponents said Perry should have let the Legislature decide whether to impose a mandate.

"He's circumventing the will of the people," said Dawn Richardson, president of Parents Requesting Open Vaccine Education, a citizens group that fought for the right to opt out of other vaccine requirements. "There are bills filed. There's no emergency except in the boardrooms of Merck, where this is failing to gain the support that they had expected."

Texas allows parents to opt out of inoculations by filing an affidavit objecting to the vaccine on religious or philosophical reasons. Even with such provisions, however, conservative groups say such requirements interfere with parents' rights to make medical decisions for their children.

Legislative aides said they are looking for ways to make it even easier for parents to get around the mandate.

The federal government approved Gardasil in June, and a government advisory panel has recommended that all girls get the shots at 11 and 12, before they are likely to be sexually active.

The New Jersey-based drug company could generate billions in sales if Gardasil — at $360 for the three-shot regimen — were made mandatory across the country. Most insurance companies now cover the vaccine, which has been shown to have no serious side effects.

Merck spokeswoman Janet Skidmore would not say how much the company is spending on lobbyists or how much it has donated to Women in Government. Susan Crosby, the group's president, also declined to specify how much the drug company gave.

A top official from Merck's vaccine division sits on Women in Government's business council, and many of the bills around the country have been introduced by members of Women in Government.
[my emphasis]

Ah, and $360 per person, and 3 shots. I also read a comment to the effect: 'Circumcision of males has been found to reduce the rate of HPV--too bad Merck can't patent that.' And circumvent legislative processes to get states to require it.

Not surprising that some would apparently automatically defend Big Pharma. So goes the corporate oligarchy.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 rev0218

Joined: 3/6/2006
Msg: 7
view profile
History
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 9:41:26 AM
Delisi is also part of the Scott and White family. Increasingly that group has been more about politics and money making than about medical care.
 packagedealx3

Joined: 2/4/2006
Msg: 8
view profile
History
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 11:54:27 AM
I don't believe that it is time from a research standpoint to mandate the vaccine but it is unfortunate that because of the conflict of interest angle, the debate about whether the concept is good or not will probably be ignored.

There are substantial links between this virus and cancer and any woman chances exposure to it even if she marries a virgin. The argument will be made that this vaccination will constitute another constraint against pre-marital sex being removed but from a medical standpoint, this is really no different than the polio vaccine, just because of the sexual connotations that apply.

I don't see a hoard of young women running out when they are teenagers thinking, 'I had that vaccination when I was 11, now I can have sex and I won't get cancer.' Yup, there is good logic there.

If we found a vaccination against a virus that could cause breast cancer would there even be a debate? That vaccine too would likely only be given to girls. It is the transmission of the virus that changes this issue into something else and it is at the root of any attempt to mandate a vaccine. Children must have the polio vaccine to attend school, so parents are already forced to give their children vaccines but parental rights will be argued in this case as well as gender bias because it will be given to girls.

The drug still needs more testing so a mandate is inappropriate at this time regardless of the political machinations. It is incumbent on any governmental agency to choose the most cost-effective vaccine, particularly if it is specified in legislative text, so by the time the legislation is passed, one would think that the manufacturer with the best deal would win the contract. This seems too much an about-face for Perry for his motivation to have much to do with preventing cancer.
 jakeo_germany

Joined: 6/17/2006
Msg: 9
view profile
History
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 12:07:50 PM
I am surprised whenever a government-science-health issue comes out of Texas without the lunatic majority of the Texas Republican Party emerging triumphant.

I have no doubt whatsoever that somewhere in Texas, a politically powerful church leader believes immunization from STDs is temptation from the devil, much in the same way that dinosaur fossils are temptation, sent from the devil, to doubt God Almighty's Holy Unerring and Literal Word, as found in The Bible, and interpreted by God's Chosen People, Republicans. And that many (most) Texans accept such beliefs as self-evident.
 Panagonia

Joined: 7/7/2006
Msg: 10
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 12:27:40 PM
It would be wise to look at the incidence of cervical cancer for American women as part of the analysis:

The incidence of it is fairly low, only affecting approximately 11,150 American women based on projected figures for 2007. (There is roughly 148 million women in the US) Out of these numbers, it is only expected that 3,670 will die from it. This is based on the total population of women in the USA.
(Based on figures from the American Cancer Society)

In comparison, projected 2007 deaths from other cancers affecting American women are:

Lung Cancer 70, 880 deaths
Breast Cancer 28, 020 deaths
Colon Cancer 26, 180 deaths
Pancreas 16, 530 deaths
Ovary 15, 280 deaths

As you can see, cervical cancer is a low, low risk and these numbers support the analysis of the situation as a profit making scheme for Merck...with the Texan governor receiving kickbacks for making the drug company's profits bigger.

 Sombient

Joined: 9/29/2006
Msg: 11
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 12:32:10 PM
Not sure the religious right wing is a fair representation of the conservative family movement rightfully questioning this vaccine.

At issue is the trade off between the vaccines purported effectiveness at treating three common forums of female genitourinary cancers (cervical, vaginal and vulvar cancers) and enforced parent cooperation in obtaining these shots, at $150-200 (present costs) for each of three shots. Thats quite an expensive to voluntarily assume - as much as six hundred bucks for a vaccine that many private health insurance providers will not cover at present. So thats precious out of pocket household expense money.

Note that HPV is now the most common viral STD in the US subadult and adult population.

In a recent evaluation in Europe (reported June 2006) of an 18,000 female patient test cohort vaccinated for 2 years, the number of HPV-associated cancer cases in the control group was 24 and none in the treated population. The likelihood of cancer formation increases dramatically over time, with age and other environmental factors, in HPV-infected female adults.

Now, this vaccine can be used up to the age of 29 (I'm still not sure why it can't be used in older patients who haven't been exposed to the virus). So pressuring parents of 6th graders into voluntarily having their daughters vaccinated for HPV isn't a good idea unless private health care insurers are also pressured to accept the preventive treatment as an acceptable charge against their covered patient policies - as are many other vaccines.

California and Michigan state legislatures have already begun evaluating the legal and ethical considerations of mandatory vaccination of young female school children.

The treatment may be opted out by parents who object on religious or ethical grounds. I suggest that the State consider pressuring health care providers to cover the costs of this vaccine.

I am neither for nor against vaccine use for HPV; its a prudent move to make it available as at present there is no other means of preventing HPV infections in young women, a disease spread by infected males.

I mentioned the competing vaccine that works in an almost identical manner, targeting the two most prevalent strains of HPV associated with oncogenesis activity, because it challenges the misguided notion that one company will benefit from the proposed bill.

Its unlikely that the CDC and FDA will back one vaccine over the other.


Acetowhitening diagnostic for cervical viral infection:
http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?URI=OPEX-13-13-4963
 Fall Line

Joined: 1/8/2007
Msg: 12
view profile
History
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 1:59:08 PM
Actually if we want to look at this from a cost benefit analysis we need to look at the incidence of cervical dysplasia. According to the American Cancer Society they predict roughly 500,000 cases of high grade cervical dysplasia in 2007, of which about 10k will result in cervical cancer. We should measure the cost of treating those 500000 women vs the cost of vaccination.

I personally believe that this is the type of pro-active aproach to disease prevention that needs to take place. As long as the vaccinations are paid for by the state, and that parents can opt out their daughters, this is a great idea.

Merck took the risk and cost to develop the vaccine, shouldn't they be allowed to see some sort of return on their investment?
 Panagonia

Joined: 7/7/2006
Msg: 13
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 2:09:29 PM
Funny...

How we have a medical sales person ^^^^^^ supporting Merck's position.

500, 000 cases of cervical dysplasia (abnormal cell growth). Out of these 500,000 cases only one percent develops into anything serious.

Another fact:

The death rate from cervical cancer continues to decline by nearly 4% a year.

Again, why is there a huge push on for this vaccination?
 Fall Line

Joined: 1/8/2007
Msg: 14
view profile
History
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 2:29:14 PM
The reason that cervical cancer is so rare and is so treatable is because it is almost always caught as cervical dysplasia and treated. If the cost of treatment is less than the cost of prevention then maybe it is a good idea to vaccinate.

I'm not supporting Merck's position as much as I'm supporting the Govenor of Texas in his, rather bold in my opinion, move to mandate the vaccinations. I could care less who manufacures the vaccine.

Just because I'm in medical sales doesn't mean I'm not a human being. Both my ex wife and my sister have been treated for cervical dysplasia...it wasn't a fun time for either one of them.
 Sombient

Joined: 9/29/2006
Msg: 15
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 2:42:22 PM
Food for thought.

The prognostic significance of acetowhitening of the vulva and HPV-DNA test. A multicentre study. Cancer Letters. 2001, vol. 172, no2, pp. 133-135 (5 ref.)

Acetowhitening of the vulva has been related to a suhclinical human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. No consense has been reached about undertaking -or not- any therapy for these acetowhite changes. We have observed from our clinical experience and in a 10 years observational follow-up, that acetowhitening of the vulva regarding high risk (16-18) and low risk (6-11) HPV groups (as assessed by PCR analysis) significantly decreased; and acetowhitening areas negative to polymerase chain reaction (PCR), significantly increased from 53% (202/382) to 85% (276/325) (P < 0.001). Our findings suggest that independently from HPV type and in the absence of cofactors, there is a statistically significant spontaneous remission of these areas.

This multicenter study clearly indicates that the body has a natural ability to achieve spontaneous remission of HPV following infection - when other factors known to be associated with HPV oncogenesis are absent.

This would be my choice in research follow up with public health practitioners encouraging those patients who are already infected to actively manage lifestyle to reduce uroitogenital hyperplasia and cancer risk.

The use of expensive vaccines should be limited to high risk populations and MUST be coupled with frequent screening and public education of the cofactors that elevate cancer risk for the general population.
 Fall Line

Joined: 1/8/2007
Msg: 16
view profile
History
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 2:48:35 PM
Summary of CDC study of the cost effectiveness of HPV Vaccine.

Discussion
We evaluated the usefulness of a potential vaccine against high-risk HPV types administered to adolescent girls and found it to be cost effective as compared to current practice ($22,755/QALY). Although the increase in quality-adjusted life expectancy from a vaccination program is modest for the individual, the increase aggregates to substantial numbers of HPV infections, cases of cervical cancer, and prevented cancer-related deaths (Table 2). Furthermore, the life-expectancy gains are similar to those realized by current vaccination programs. Vaccination against high-risk HPV saved 2.8 life days and 4.0 quality-adjusted life days per person. In comparison, vaccinations against measles, mumps, rubella, and pertussis each save 2.7, 3.0, 0.3, and 3.3 life days, respectively (28,29). Sensitivity analyses found that the HPV vaccine would be cost effective, even assuming vaccine efficacy as low as 40% or that booster shots would be required every 3 years.

Here is the url for those who wish to read the complet article.

http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol9no1/02-0168.htm
 Panagonia

Joined: 7/7/2006
Msg: 17
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 3:01:13 PM
Fall line:

The case in point is a 'forced' vaccination for a disease where there is less than a 5,000 projected death rate for all of the women in America. Based on this number, what is the percentage of Texan women being affected? Hundreds? There is a huge amount of money changing hands in order to save hundreds of lives for something that could be preventable by using condoms, limiting sexual partners, sex education, etcetera.

The returns on this mean a high profit in Merck's pockets.

My empathy in your family members being affected by it. I am only demonstrating that the Texas policy does not play out when you look at the statistics of women infected.

Furthermore, if you actually read the article that was posted in the OP's post, a Merck spokesman says that cervical cancer is the second leading cause of death in women!!!!That's misrepresentation of the facts.
 Fall Line

Joined: 1/8/2007
Msg: 18
view profile
History
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 3:28:32 PM
The vaccination is not being forced, anyone that does not wish to be vaccinated may opt out.

California is also considering a similar requirement for vaccination...I personally think it's a good idea, especially after reading the CDC study. Also HPV is not preventable by using condoms or by sex education. The CDC estimates that 80% if women have been, or will be, infected with HPV in their lifetime. In other words, if you're a sexually active female odds are you will be infected eventually.
 Panagonia

Joined: 7/7/2006
Msg: 19
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 3:39:44 PM
The vaccination is operating under what is called "negative consent": You must opt out instead of making it optional to opt in.

According to the University of Maryland, Medical Centre, the risk of cervical dysplasia (abnormal cell growth which could lead to cervical cancer) can be lowered by practicing safe sex, or in other words, using a barrier method of birth control (condoms). Also a diet rich in vegetables dramatically reduces the risk of affection.

By sex education, I mean: Safe sex/using condoms. Multiple partners increases risks of a number of diseases.

And no, Fall line you have grossly overexagerated something. You said, "if you are a sexually active female you will be infected eventually". That is not true, even by your own posting where you said 10 thousand women in all of america would be affected.

There is a higher incidence of it occuring in Afro Americans.
There are higher risks associated with women who have and/or are doing:

Human papilloma virus (HPV) infection
Genital warts
Smoking
Early onset of sexual activity (younger than 18 years old)
Multiple sexual partners
Having a partner whose former partner had cervical cancer
History of one or more sexually transmitted diseases, such as genital herpes or HIV
Having suppressed immune function from, for example, HIV or the use of chemotherapeutic medications to treat cancer
Long-term use (5 or more years) of birth control pills
Being born to a mother who took diethylstilbestrol (DES) to become pregnant or to sustain pregnancy (this drug was used many years ago to promote pregnancy but it is no longer used for these purposes)
Low levels of folate (vitamin B9) in red blood cells
Dietary deficiencies in vitamin A, beta-carotene, selenium, vitamin E, and vitamin C

 SoTexMan

Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 20
view profile
History
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 3:48:27 PM
Hey, all:

Hey, Panagonia: Thanks for pointing out the purpose of the thread as spelled out clearly in the title and the first message. This is about politics, hence the Politics thread. If someone wants to talk ad nauseum about medicine and vaccines, there is a thread in Health and Wellness that awaits you. I did a search beforing starting this thread--go do it yourself and Go There.

Conflicts of interest, flouting the legislative process, lobbying, the corporate oligarchy, are the issues, not the efficacy of a vaccine. It is about greed and power and its abuse.

This is about, as one person said, about an ostensibly conservative politician presumably in the mold of 'less-government' Republicans, subverting the legislative process--no debate, no notice, no process, and caving into corporate interests for corporate greed. It is also a warning to other states and provinces--the subversion is real.

It doesn't make a goddam bit of difference what company or what product it is--it is about the corporate oligarchy. Who is straining to see the Big Picture?

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 Panagonia

Joined: 7/7/2006
Msg: 21
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 3:54:35 PM
Yuppers, David. I got side tracked too! I'll stay on the path here.

In response to your ''straining to see the Big Picture", I'm kind of curious...what kind of waves is this making in Texas? I've only read about the parents groups who feel the government is overstepping their boundaries.

Again, Fall Line. Please measure out cost effectiveness when there is such a low fatality rate? Even the infection rate of cervical cancer is low, low, low. The stats don't measure up to the Texas governor's policy nor does that same policy allow for a discussion by Representatives in the State forum to bring up probablity factors.

It's a done deal. That's the disturbing part. More erosion of the democratic process.
 SoTexMan

Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 22
view profile
History
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 5:11:42 PM
Hey, all:

Hey, Panagonia: Fortunately there have been waves here in Texas. It has been in the news since it was announced, and by the way, it surprised everyone but Merck and the little inside clic involved. A Republicanm State Senator Nelson, chair of a pertinent committee to the issue, has spoken up about it. The 'Ledge', as Texans dryly refer to the State Legislature, is planning hearings. And, as you mention, the usual parents groups, including the one in the story from the Austin American-Statesman, are up in arms about it. Some are appealing to the State Attorney General for a ruling, but he apparently has already ruled that students in private schools can not as such opt out of the vaccine.

I guess it is a 'done deal' for now anyway, in Texas, but the Big Picture has nothing to do with the vaccine, as I have said, but about the creeping abandonment of democratic process for greed. As far as I am concerned, it is another lie of the so-called 'conservatives' in power. The name of this is corporate oligarchy.

I have been trying to find out what other states in the U.S. have had legislation rejected. This is apparently one reason why this corporate end run was done. $60 million in Texas, compared to other states' populations, X all 50 states? There is the calculation that illustrates the greed. As someone pointed out and as some news stories will illustrate, Merck's balance sheet appears to look rather weak, also providing motive for the end run.

I am still wondering if there is any similar legislation--or governmental corruption--in other U.S. states or Canadian provinces.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 Sombient

Joined: 9/29/2006
Msg: 23
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 5:20:57 PM
18 state legislatures have discussed the issue.


January 31. 2007 Indiana Senate reworks HPV vaccine bill


Bill would give parents information on vaccine to prevent cancer
By DEANNA MARTIN
Associated Press Writer

INDIANAPOLIS (AP) -- A Senate committee watered down a bill Wednesday that would have vaccinated most sixth-grade girls against a sexually transmitted disease that can cause cervical cancer, a move designed to address concerns from some family groups.

The new version of the legislation would send home information about the link between human papillomavirus, or HPV, and cervical cancer and would tell parents that an HPV vaccine is available.

The amended version pleased some opponents who wanted parents to have more choice over whether their children were vaccinated. But supporters of the original plan noted parents could have opted out of the vaccine and that girls would not have been prevented from enrolling in school without it.

''It seems to me that parent has a choice either way,'' said Sen. Gary Dillon, R-Columbia City.

The revised bill passed the Senate Health Committee 11-0 and now moves to the full Senate for consideration.

Bill sponsor Sen. Connie Lawson, R-Danville, said she thought most parents would get their daughters the vaccine, which is given as a series of three shots over six months.

''This bill is about saving the lives of Hoosier women,'' Lawson said.

Gardasil, made by Merck and approved by the federal government in June, protects girls and women against strains of HPV that are responsible for most cases of cervical cancer. A government advisory panel has recommended that all girls get the shots at 11 and 12, before they are likely to be sexually active.

At least 18 states are debating whether to require the vaccine, but no state has yet to add Gardasil to the list of vaccinations youngsters must have under law to be enrolled in school.

Some conservatives and parents'-rights groups say such requirements would encourage premarital sex and could interfere with the way parents raise their children.

Indiana Health Commissioner Judy Monroe dismissed arguments that the vaccine would promote promiscuity.

''There's no evidence that seat belts have increased reckless driving,'' she noted. ''There's no evidence that when we get tetanus shots, we seek rusty nails.''

The watered-down bill displeased some advocates, who said lawmakers needed to do more.

Kelsey Kauffman, who has worked with low-income children in Greencastle, said children with irresponsible parents are more likely to be sexually active at an early age and could be exposed to HPV. But because their parents often are not very involved in their lives, the chances of them getting a non-mandated vaccine are lower than other children, she said.

''My concern is that the children that we most want to cover are the ones who are least likely to get the vaccine,'' she said.

Some opponents of the original bill questioned the safety of the vaccine and said more studies should be done.

Monica Boyer, with Indiana Voice for the Family, said Merck stands to make billions from the vaccine if states require it. Several health officials who spoke for the bill Wednesday had done business with Merck in the past, although they said Merck did not urge them to speak in support of the bill.

Lawson said it didn't matter who makes the vaccine.

''Have you ever dreamt that someday we might have a vaccine against cancer? And it's here,'' Lawson said. ''What difference does it make what company makes it? If it's there, and if it's available, why wouldn't we want to protect the health of Hoosier women?''

Indiana's health commissioner agreed.

''To have a vaccine that prevents cancer is a milestone in public health,'' Monroe said. ''We have eradicated smallpox. We have almost eradicated polio, at least in this country. We have an opportunity now to eradicate cervical cancer, and we should all join together to do so.''
 SoTexMan

Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 24
view profile
History
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 7:32:56 PM
Hey, all:

As has been pointed out in the Forum Violations thread, there is another thread that has a tenuous connection to this one. However the ONLY shared feature is the HPV vaccine. But since it PREDATES the POLITICAL events we have been referring to, it cannot be redundant--unless someone has a time machine. Someone's bias and duplicity is showing. Someone may want to move to that thread and leave this one to the politics of the issue. Attempting to conflate the 2 is typical and disingenuous.

The issue of the erosion or abandonment of democratic principles and the growth of the corporate oligarchy is one that has been constantly present for generations and covers a huge range of daily life, far beyond medicine or any single issue. One Big Picture issue is this closer and closer cooperation between business and government. A simple example of the corporate oligarchy is wrapped up in supposed efforts to "shrink the size of government". One way they attempt to achieve this is to privatize a host of traditionally government services, and elected and non-elected government and private industry share the profits.

Among many facets is privatization of the "corrections" industry. I invite everyone to look up "Corrections Connection", where you will find a resource used by the fast-growing private for-profit jail industry. Why is a there a War on Drugs? Occupants for jails. Higher and more extreme jail sentences? More occupants for jails. Why are funds for drug rehabilitation cut? Repeat occupants for jails. We all know the first rule of business: "a successful business is built on repeat customers".

Defense, medicine, food, petrochemicals, energy, jails, manufacturing--all are corrupted by the cooperation of government and business. This is the subject of the thread--the corporate oligarchy in whatever form it takes. That is the BIG Picture. We can do much better than this.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 rev0218

Joined: 3/6/2006
Msg: 25
view profile
History
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 9:43:22 PM
Perry also wants to privatize the Texas Lottery. This gov got elected with 38 % of the vote. It is obvious that he will not get another term after this one. Just maybe he is feathering his nest. Texas is not going to do any better until we throw out those Republican pretty boys that we gave all of the leadership roles.
Page 1 of 2 1, 2
 
Show ALL Forums  > Politics  > Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?