| QuirkyAlone? Posted: 7/25/2007 6:37:28 PM | I recently became aware of a new description for a type of single person: the QuirkyAlone. On her website about this group, Sasha Cagen describes them as follows:
We are the puzzle pieces who seldom fit with other puzzle pieces. We inhabit singledom as our natural resting state. In a world where marriage and proms define the social order, we are, by force of our personalities and inner strength, rebels.
Yet make no mistake: We are no less concerned with coupling than your average serial monogamist. Secretly, we are romantics, romantics of the highest order. We want a miracle. Out of millions we have to find the one who will understand.
For the quirkyalone, there is no patience for dating just for the sake of not being alone. On a fine but by no means transcendent date we dream of going home to watch television. We would prefer to be alone with our own thoughts than with a less than perfect fit. We are almost constitutionally incapable of casual relationships.
It would be better to be untethered and open to possibility, living for the exhilaration of meeting someone new, of not knowing what the night will bring. We seek momentous meetings.
By the same token, being alone is understood as a wellspring of feeling and experience. Our weekends are full of intricate rituals. There is a bittersweet fondness for silence. All those nights alone, travelling, going to movies alone—they bring insight.
"You should not let yourself be confused in your solitude by the fact that there is something in you that wants to break out of it. People have (with the help of conventions) oriented all their solutions toward the easy and toward the easiest side of the easy; but it is clear that we must hold to what is difficult."
This description seems to fit me pretty well... Anyone else? | |
|
| QuirkyAlone? Posted: 7/25/2007 6:47:23 PM | I think this can apply to Guys too,
Having read that, there is a lot I can relate to as well, My last relationship being the worst I have ever had, has made me in no rush to go into another one. I do enjoy my time out to myself but at the same time I do sometimes think it would be nice to have a partner again... but it always comes back to the fact that I dont want to get involved again. I am also an Aquarian and we can be very independant as it is a noted character of our sign (I don't normally do Horoscopes but the characteristic descriptive is spot on) I think at the moment I am following just that, being very private and fiercely independant. | |
|
| QuirkyAlone? Posted: 7/25/2007 6:59:30 PM | Oh yes. I fit that description almost to a T. One part that doesn't quite match is the intricate rituals. I'm lucky enough to be blessed with some good friends who have common interests and hobbies, so my weekends are usually spent with them--that and doing housework and spending quality time with my kid.
I'm not afraid to eat in a restaurant alone or travel alone and in fact, I usually enjoy it and most often make friends. I find the comments about solitude interesting. For a time in my life I was so insanely busy, all I craved was solitude and couldn't get it.
Then, I came to a place where I got it, then got bored and became lonely. So I fell into a relationship with a man who wasn't right for me and realized the loneliness that comes from actually being alone is much better than that empty, cold loneliness that comes from being in a relationship that's not working. Once I transcended that, I learned to appreciate and enjoy my solitude again and now I'm pretty content.
Also, I wouldn't say that I conciously inhabit singledom as my natural resting state. I am naturally wired to have a partner and I'm one of those that does function better with a good man in my life, so this state I've adapted to has come by circumstance not necessarily by choice. However, I've also learned how to live without one and stay happy regardless.
I wonder how many of these "quirkyalone" people are INFJs? | |
|
| QuirkyAlone? Posted: 7/25/2007 7:16:40 PM | That description is so close to home, I'm considering carrying a copy around with me to hand out to those that wonder why I am the way I am! LOL
I don't know how many of us might be INFJs, but I'm an ESTJ | |
|
| QuirkyAlone? Posted: 7/25/2007 7:18:28 PM | sounds cool...where do I sign up? | |
|
| QuirkyAlone? Posted: 7/25/2007 7:25:17 PM | I'm a Gemini, but I do identify with much of what is mentioned in the article. I think it has to do with being your own best friend, when all other connections fell through. Feeling Out of place is commonplace for me, but always sought by others for consolation, advice or just to be listened to. Sometimes being surrounded by too many people confused and distracted me from the calm i felt when alone- and the clarity that sense of alone-ness brought me. I would often laugh to myself, and ususally no one seemed understand my humor or wild imagination.
Secretly, we are romantics, romantics of the highest order. We want a miracle. Out of millions we have to find the one who will understand. As a kid, I had a vivid sense that I knew what it was like to have the right 'fit' partner for me- and have that connection and understanding. I still have a sense of 'knowing' it exists- but just not having found it yet. QuirkyAlone . Q | |
|
| QuirkyAlone? Posted: 7/25/2007 7:41:38 PM | The article seems to mess up the very real issue that some are alone... because they are quirky. Lets face it, not everyone was meant to be in a relationship. | |
|
| QuirkyAlone? Posted: 7/26/2007 3:00:48 AM |
We are the puzzle pieces who seldom fit with other puzzle pieces. Defines me and my special someone. We're both very quirky, neither of us believe in dating, we are not remotely on the same wavelength as most people we meet. And we won't compromise or quirkiness either because we have strong beliefs in our way of being.
We want a miracle. Out of millions we have to find the one who will understand. We are grateful each day that we did find each other and if two people as quirky and happy to be alone as we were/are can find each other and fit together like two puzzle pieces that were never meant to be apart, then I think others can too. I think the key is not to compromise yourself and to stay open to the possibility of finding someone amazing who you will not perhaps see in the first instant but who will take time to get to know in all their quirkiness, just as you and all your quirkiness take time for anyone to get to know. | |
|
| QuirkyAlone? Posted: 7/26/2007 3:20:39 AM | wow....I thought I was the only one...very interesting read | |
|
| QuirkyAlone? Posted: 7/26/2007 3:53:05 AM | It seems A Lot of people also miss the difference between being alone and being lonely. Being Alone has to do with the ability to be on your own and comfortable with it as well as needing and really enjoying your time alone. Being Lonley has to do with feeling the need for companionship (to some it is a constant need). I have seen some people that can't bear to be with themselves- and always have to be accompanied. It is nice to know others that understand the difference. Cheers Q | |
|
daisie
| Joined: 9/22/2004 Msg: 11 | |
| QuirkyAlone? Posted: 7/26/2007 4:04:47 AM | Count me in. I adore being single....I adore the silence (nothing bittersweet about it).
I also adore being in a great realationship...and I've had a good share of those.
When I'm single I dont crave a relationship...I embrace the solitude and the INSGHT and growth that comes from being MINDFUL of the moment. There is nothign to compare with that kind of serene personal experience and new outlook on the world. I love it! I'm not in any hurry to give this up.
But like I said, being with a GREAT guy in a GREAT relationship has a lot to offer too. :-) Note: I did not say an "ok guy in a problemmatic relationship". that kinda thing doesn't have much to teach me. There are definite lessons in that, but they can inhibit other life lessons. so you have to decide WHICH one (great relationship or problemmatic relationship) will ultimately lead to the most growth for you.
I think the key is to learn to do both and to experience BOTH ways of life (single and coupled) to be confident with both lifestyles......that kind of confidence origniates WITHIN YOURSELF...and that is discovered and developed while being alone. Then you take it with you to enhance all future relationships with more appreciation, patience, flexibility, openess, expression, trust, and less defensiveness.
So.....one crucial key to successful interpersonal skills is to develop your intrapersonal skills first. Embrace bing single and all it has to offer...get to k now the universe within yourself!! Then have fun getting to know all these different "puzzle pieces" in the world...you find that you even enjoy the ones who are NOT a good match, because you still learn something from them and you rarely/never feel a need to be angry or hurt about anything....they have their own intrapersonal journeys and many of them are not tuned into all that. This causes them to behave and think irrationally. But.....thats their journey....and you are free and able to let them take their journey....without you needing to be tangled up in it.
BON VOYAGE!! | |
|
| QuirkyAlone? Posted: 7/26/2007 4:13:20 AM | I'm Aquarian also, I would like to find my man but not at the expense of my happiness. I'm not lonely, I need someone who complements me, not someone I have to fight to get to fit. I want the perfect fit right away..... he he..not asking for much am I. I'll share a poem I found, if I can find that, the poor man will never be rid of me, lol
Love me without fear Trust me without questioning Need me without demanding Want me without restrictions Accept me without change Desire me without inhibitions For a love so free.... Will never fly away. ~ by****Sutphen ~ | |
|
| QuirkyAlone? Posted: 7/26/2007 4:53:24 AM | Typologies of that kind have their pros and their cons. While they seem to satisfy a need for labelling and self-definition, their scientific or even applied value is debateable, IMO.
I fit SOME of the element of the type. But not all. So what?
Alert: "QuirkyAlone" types, as described, seem to me excellent "prey" for sophisticated PLAYERS. Seeking momentous experiences or whatever, that may lead into the one-nite-stand bed of pro players who know how to offer ST "momentous" experiences while the allude to LT ones. "Quirky Alones", be aware and careful of your Achilles Heel! Protect it, else see what happened to Achilles! He was a romantic too, chose glory over family life (see movie Troy or Homer's Iliad). | |
|
| QuirkyAlone? Posted: 7/26/2007 5:41:16 AM | | ^^^^^^ Good point Nick, I've realized the same thing. | |
|
| QuirkyAlone? Posted: 7/26/2007 5:42:33 AM |
Alert: "QuirkyAlone" types, as described, seem to me excellent "prey" for sophisticated PLAYERS. Seeking momentous experiences or whatever, that may lead into the one-nite-stand bed of pro players who know how to offer ST "momentous" experiences while the allude to LT ones. "Quirky Alones", be aware and careful of your Achilles Heel! Protect it, else see what happened to Achilles! He was a romantic too, chose glory over family life (see movie Troy or Homer's Iliad). I don't think this is right, NickThinker. A "QuirkyAlone" type is by definition happy alone and by definition quirky. It'd be far too much hard work for a player: they'd be far more likely to target those who are a) more keen to find someone, anyone, to love them and b) more predictable. It's hard to get to know quirky types who enjoy their own company. It's hard to play someone who doesn't buy into conventional patterns. As Douglas Adams said: "predictable people get caught". I think quirky types are fairly safe from the typical "numbers" players.
The worst thing for quirky types is the pressure to conform and the idea that if you want to meet someone you feel pressured to do so through modes of interaction that seem quite bizarre, like dating. Over romanticising and wishful thinking are dangers for everyone but I think less of a danger, in terms of romantic attachments, for someone whose self-esteem is not dependent on others opinions of them. | |
|
| QuirkyAlone? Posted: 7/26/2007 6:04:23 AM |
It'd be far too much hard work for a player: they'd be far more likely to target those who are a) more keen to find someone, anyone, to love them and b) more predictable. It's hard to get to know quirky types who enjoy their own company. It's hard to play someone who doesn't buy into conventional patterns. As Douglas Adams said: "predictable people get caught". I think quirky types are fairly safe from the typical "numbers" players.
I said from pro players, sophisticated ones, ones who seek the challenge of the hard work it takes to "score". And then they walk away content "victors" with the championship trophy from a "battle hard fought". Did I mention "typical numbers players"? Nope. | |
|
| QuirkyAlone? Posted: 7/26/2007 6:06:22 AM | Thinks I am a "quirky-quirky"..... | |
|
| QuirkyAlone? Posted: 7/26/2007 6:18:06 AM | Ah crap; yet ANOTHER label to stick on my forehead...
Fry | |
|
| QuirkyAlone? Posted: 7/26/2007 6:31:26 AM |
I said from pro players, sophisticated ones, ones who seek the challenge of the hard work it takes to "score". And then they walk away content "victors" with the championship trophy from a "battle hard fought". Did I mention "typical numbers players"? Nope. Oh sorry, that wasn't clear. It might be useful if you could explain this type of player in more detail, perhaps with examples; because its nothing I have ever heard of, let alone encountered and it might be useful to others on this thread if it is truly a vulnerable area. To me the behaviour you outline just sounds psychopathic. As I understand it, a QuirkyAlone person is not a challenge because they are defensive (in fact they are quite open) but is a challenge in the sense that they are different and therefore hard to understand and relate to. What would be the "victory" here? I feel that I am missing the point somewhere and would appreciate more explanation. | |
|
| QuirkyAlone? Posted: 7/26/2007 6:32:43 AM | I'd rather be alone...than wish I was | |
|
| QuirkyAlone? Posted: 7/26/2007 7:03:01 AM | | If a poster boy is needed to represent the "Quirky Alone" I am available for a photo-shoot Monday-Friday...and weekends too! | |
|
| QuirkyAlone? Posted: 7/26/2007 7:12:07 AM | Wow, Fanny (that was my mother's name) that was really very interesting. I think someone has been following me around and taking notes. And, as so many other posters have noted, it does seem to be a characteristic of Aquarians. I too, am an Aquarian. Being alone doesn't bother me at all, I sometimes tell people that my favorite sound is the garage door closing when I'm home. However, I am a very romantic individual who enjoys being in love when it happens, it just doesn't happen easily.
Thanks again for sharing. | |
|
| QuirkyAlone? Posted: 7/26/2007 7:36:15 AM | It partially describes me. I do the 'being alone' part; I like to travel by myself and go to a restaurant with a book, I didn't go to any proms, I get upset if I don't have enough private time, etc.
However, the whole 'looking for a perfect relationship' part isn't me at all; I'm not a romantic as they describe it, I'm more of a pragmatic. I'm fine with a casual relationship; I just want someone reasonable for those times I don't want to do things alone. | |
|
| QuirkyAlone? Posted: 7/26/2007 7:55:46 AM | Sounds like me, yes,.. Quirky/alone. I do think you'll find quite a few INFJ types in there, I'm one myself,.. and its a fair description of an INFJ type, or any introverted intuitive I suppose. I'm not sure that quirky /alone's would suffer from even a 'Pro player though. most quirkys are just pottering around, doing their own thing. The time and effort involved in just getting to know one, and trying to get past that Intuition would make it very hard work. I tend to think the 'quirky may cinfuse and bamboozle the 'player' not the other way around. i Just being the type of people we are, means that we dont follow societys dictates as closely as others, we are what we are because we like it. I really value my alone time,.. and it would take a very special connection to bring me out of total isolation. never say never though, it may happen, if not, I'm very content to be Quirky/alone. x | |
|
| QuirkyAlone? Posted: 7/26/2007 8:06:57 AM | interesting read. while i'm not a big fan of labels, i have to admit i tested as an INFJ, and the description of a "quirkyalone" seems to feel kinda familiar......
i'm not sure if this has been mentioned yet because i haven't read all the posts, but there appears to be an online community dedicated to quirkyalones. i don't know if you can post direct links here, but a simple search will find it. | |
|