Paganism is the religion for free thinkers

Christians are very good at tossing flack at us

Christian friends didn't know that from my religion came theirs

One must be open minded and respect the thoughts and feelings of others

I have Jewish friends; Muslim friends; Catholic friends and yes...I even have Christian friends

rude and insulting

This isn't ment as a religious bashing thread, more so of a "Why are some, or all the religious people I have met so cruel, mean, and disheartening" and when I say that I myself am Athiest, they think im the scum of the world because I choose to not believe in a higher power, but i'm a good person. I never cheat, I don't lie, if someone needs help, I help them out.
I'm just fairly confused here, if anyone can help me out with this... it would be awesome! Thanks.

That's just it, the people you refer to are "religious", but are not "Christian". There's a difference.

I have dated multiple religious people or have met multiple religious people in my life. Now, I understand that religion is an ideal good, but why are all of the people that I have met bad people?

This isn't true at all. "Good" and "bad" are social constructs made by societies and refined by personal experience on an individual basis.

Another critique of moral relativism which falls into this category postulates that anyone who claims that no moral absolutes exist undermines their ability to justify their own existence. According to this argument, if a moral relativist is intellectually honest, they have no right to claim that they should remain unharmed by other individuals who adhere to a subjectively determined or culturally-bound moral theory which does not regard causing harm to others, or at least moral relativists, as wrong. In this sense, it is difficult for a moral relativist to hold that they have a right to exist (and in doing so, formulate their own set of moral values) in the first place. Just as they are unable to argue that slavery, the Holocaust, etc. are ultimately immoral, moral relativists are unable to argue that the discontinuation of their own lives at the hands of another individual (who adheres to a different set of values) would be ultimately immoral, either. They can claim that it is wrong in the sense of being against their moral code, but what is important here is the behaviour of the attacker; there is no necessary reason why their attacker should be swayed by someone else's personal or cultural beliefs. In this sense, it is argued, moral relativists suffer from an inability to defend their own interests, regardless of their own moral code.

Relativism is sometimes identified (usually by its critics) as the thesis that all points of view are equally valid. In ethics, this amounts to saying that all moralities are equally good; in epistemology it implies that all beliefs, or belief systems, are equally true. Critics of relativism typically dismiss such views as incoherent since they imply the validity even of the view that relativism is false. They also charge that such views are pernicious since they undermine the enterprise of trying to improve our ways of thinking. Perhaps because relativism is associated with such views, few philosophers are willing to describe themselves as relativists.