REGISTER
|
MAIL/PROFILE
|
HELP
|
NOW ONLINE
|
SEARCH
|
RATING
| FORUMS |
SUCCESS STORIES
Posted In Forum:
All Forums
Alabama
Alaska
Alberta
Arizona
Arkansas
Art/Music
Ask A Girl
Ask A Guy
Australia
British Columbia
Broken Hearts
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Dating & Love Advice
Dating Experiences
Dating Sites
Delaware
District Of Columbia
Event Hosts forum
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Health & Fitness
Humor
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Introductions
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Manitoba
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Brunswick
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
Newfoundland
News/Current Events
North Carolina
North Dakota
Nova Scotia
Off Topic
Ohio
Oklahoma
Ontario
Oregon
Over 30
Over 45
Pennsylvania
Plentyoffish Get Togethers
Plentyoffish Site/Suggestions/Help
Poems And Quotes
Politics
Prince Edward Island
Profile Reviews
Quebec
Recipes & Cooking
Relationships
Religion/Supernatural
Rhode Island
Saskatchewan
Science/Philosophy
Sex and Dating
Single Parents
South Carolina
South Dakota
Sports
Stories/creative writing
Technology and computers
Tennessee
Testimonials
Texas
Uk Forums
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Volunteer Moderators Only
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Home
login
MyForums
Show ALL Forums
Author
Thread: do guns really matter?
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
12 (
view
)
do guns really matter?
Posted:
11/24/2009 7:09:18 AM
I'm a gun collector myself, and wouldn't use that picture as my main one. The pose itself looks just like that, a pose. A lot of people don't like guns, and poses tend to scare them. That doesn't mean that you're wrong for enjoying your hobby, but I'd suggest that if you wish to include firearms in your photos to make them more natural/non-posed photos. On a side note, its good to see that you're properly indexing your firearm. A lot of "trained" people still can't grasp that concept.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
42 (
view
)
Personal protection canines
Posted:
11/23/2009 10:47:19 AM
^^^Dog fighting already is illegal in every state as far as I know.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
72 (
view
)
Hardest profession to date?
Posted:
11/23/2009 10:28:31 AM
That goes both ways though. How many people won't give officers information or cheer when one gets hurt? The us vs them mentality usually doesn't come from no where, but from experience.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
69 (
view
)
Hardest profession to date?
Posted:
11/23/2009 8:40:36 AM
I guess I might as well delete my profile then. I'm a corrections office that works evening shift and weekends. I don't know whats with all of the hate for LEOs though. I live on a lake and we had people riding their 4wheelers around the lake and were tearing up the beach. I stopped them to tell them again not to ride on our property and ended up getting into a debate over it. Long story short, she called the SO and I happened to know the officer from when I worked in sales. He was all business in front of her, but was small talk with me once she left. Point being, LEOs are people too. You just have to understand that they have an important job and ethical guidelines to follow. I can only think of one bad experience with an LEO and I think it was because he was trying to profile me.
Also curious why the hate for butchers. Its just a job. Does that same hate cross over for hunters who process their own meat?
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
61 (
view
)
Why is violence for self defence acceptable by law since you can just run away instead?
Posted:
11/22/2009 9:55:58 PM
I'm well aware of that incident where the guy shot the two criminals breaking into the neighbors house and heard the phone call back when it was first released (I'm very active on another forum that quickly post any kind of news story like this). It was stated that all you have to do is drag the bodies through the doorway. That's very bad advice. That could get the person charged with tampering with evidence. The fact is that you have to know the laws in your area to know if you are justified in using deadly force to defend yourself. You can't just go around moving bodies and think that you are going to get off. I'd have to look into Texas law again because I don't remember how it reads, but I'm pretty sure that its similiar to FL's in that you can use deadly force to prevent a forciable felony, which includes burglery..
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
14 (
view
)
Female Athletes
Posted:
11/22/2009 7:59:21 AM
All I know is that Maria Sharapova still looked good even in her booking photo. Unfortunately I only took the photo and wasn't able to get her finger prints too. (she got arrested back in spring of '06 in Jacksonville, FL)
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
56 (
view
)
Why is violence for self defence acceptable by law since you can just run away instead?
Posted:
11/22/2009 7:44:00 AM
Well, Texas is it's own country. You could shoot someone out in the street and as long as you drag the body across your doorframe before the cops get there, no jury will convict you. Not saying that's right, it's just Texas.
Do you honestly believe that? For starters the police would be able to tell that the body was moved. Also most of the states with decent gun laws don't require that the person be in the house for the homeowners to use self defense.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
189 (
view
)
Pharmacist defends store with gun. Charged with murder
Posted:
11/21/2009 7:30:21 AM
^^^Thats exactly right. Let the decent person die and it gets swept under the rug, anything else and it'll be in the news. Lets it be a law abiding citizen that takes out the trash and they'll be after his head. Though I know one guy personally who I didn't see much in the news about
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
7 (
view
)
Dad or Jail?
Posted:
11/20/2009 11:40:47 AM
^^^^I'm a little tired and must have missed that part of the story. Mind pointing it out to me? I saw the part about the kids reasons being part of a confidentiality agreement, but not the part where it said what they were.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
21 (
view
)
couple arrested for not tipping.,,
Posted:
11/20/2009 7:53:02 AM
Oh bull! If I choose to go to a nice restaurant...one that serves good food and (of course) wine, I expect the prep to take longer, the service to take longer and if the place is packed (because of their good reputation that drew me there in the first place), the whole thing to be a "dining experience" rather than just "a meal".
So what do you do with the restaurants that have lines streaming out the door and hand out those buzzy/vibraty thingys? Shut them down, cuz they're too busy?
If she was so thirsty and in such a freaking hurry, she should have just told her old man to go through the drive-thru at Burger Whop.
Unfortunately, I've had and dined with, friends who will go to nice places and find any excuse they can to get something comp'd, for free, discounted, etc. Pieces of shyt they were, and glad to say, no longer my friends.
All of that said, though...if the 18% gratuity for a party of 'x' is "mandatory" rather than "expected" was written...IMO, they get what they deserve. If they were that dissatisfied, they should of got up, paid for their drinks and left
Thats funny, I didn't realize that food could tell what kind of place it was being cooked at and therefore changed the cooking time. Wait, it doesn't. A steak cooks the same way if its part of a $15 meal or a $100 meal. Having a line out the door doesn't matter, because they aren't being waited on. Only those sitting at the tables or bar eating effect the wait time. If they're so busy that they can't serve people in a timely fashion then they should call more people in. I was at lunch on day and saw an applicant get hired on the spot, because they were short handed. There should also be no mandatory gratuity. The level of service often drops because of it, and instead of having to keep up 3 different tables, they can deal with one bigger one, there requiring fewer trips.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
81 (
view
)
New Civil War
Posted:
11/19/2009 5:48:31 PM
^^^You mean not allowing states rights? There's bickering going on about that fairly often
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
44 (
view
)
Why is violence for self defence acceptable by law since you can just run away instead?
Posted:
11/19/2009 5:46:23 PM
^^^Why not recommend something like a Keltec P3AT. Its small and is a decent round for self defense. Its the smallest I'd use, but its still better than a .22lr. There's also other good guns out there, by other companies. In a .22lr pistol the Browning Buckmark is an excellent gun. In something in a bigger caliber you have Glock, Sig,HK, Springfield Armory, and Kahr. That isn't all of the companies and that doesn't include getting into 1911s and varients. As far as the stopping power of .25 and .32, its really kinda pointless. I'll agree that both rounds lack power and the .25 flat out sucks. However I know of a guy who got shot in the face with a 12ga slug and lived. I don't recall the distance, but it wasn't all that far away. Pointbeing, just because you have a powerful round, it doesn't mean that its definately going to work
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
38 (
view
)
Why is violence for self defence acceptable by law since you can just run away instead?
Posted:
11/18/2009 11:55:01 AM
^^^Actually you can be justified in defending yourself agaisnt a spitter. You don't know what they have and could end up with catching something you really don't want. Depending on state laws, under the right conditions they could face assault with a deadly weapon, or attempted murder. Spit on an LEO in FL and you can be facing 3rd degree felonly charges, even under the most basic circumstances.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
69 (
view
)
Suicides increase as foreclosures rise
Posted:
11/18/2009 10:12:52 AM
^^^I never said there wasn't government waste. There's a lot of it. I can see in my job alone where probably a 1/2 million could be trimmed from the budget in a matter of just a month or two. Probably could be a lot more than that if some things were handled differently in certain areas. I think people should have the option of taking their portion of taxes that go to government handouts and using them for charities in how they see fit. Of course that would be abused, but I'm willing to bet that we could still do a better job than the government can at it.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
67 (
view
)
Suicides increase as foreclosures rise
Posted:
11/18/2009 9:50:58 AM
We can drive around the poor neighborhoods with joy, joking that "those people" (in FL_CO's words) just need to find a job. How ironic, considering that "those people" pay FL-CO's paycheck in their taxes every year. A man's character is not judged by whether he bought his first house at 19, or has 3 Hummers in the driveway. It's what he does for the people who can't do for themselves. Stuff is meaningless - only life is important. Just my 2 cents. And a line from the Fifth Element
Really? People who pay no income taxes and are living off of the government through welfare programs are paying me? Wow, I didn't know that people who didn't pay anything in, paid for my salary.
You ever heard of the saying "Give a man a fish and feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and feed him for a lifetime"? If we can get people to do for themselves this country would be much better off. Some truly can't, but most can and just refuse to.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
28 (
view
)
Why is violence for self defence acceptable by law since you can just run away instead?
Posted:
11/17/2009 8:49:07 AM
BTW... We now have a wooden wheelchair ramp out our front door because of Mother. The local cops told me that actually is an ADVERTISEMENT for burglars. So I got us a BIG dog. Any stranger enters my house, uninvited, in the middle of the night... my dog has my permission to maul them to death. If they do survive... that should make them think TWICE about doing that ever again!!! And I do have a Beware of Dog sign.
10 yrs ago, I did have 2 situations. 1 was a stalking/drunk ex-boyfriend. The other was troubled teens. Both times, they did not have weapons. If I had a dog back then... chances are it would of ended in my behalf, instead of the way it did. Granted if they have a weapon, chances are my dog will be dead, but then so will I.
People put too much faith in dogs. I've got nothing agaisnt them, I like dogs, and own one. However you don't know what it will actually do until something happens unless its been professionly trained for that type of situation.
As far as your situations, had you been armed and shown that you weren't afraid it probably would have been different. A lot of times just standing up to the threat can make them back down. I don't just mean verbally either, make yourself look like a threat to them.
As far as your "Beware of Dog" sign, I hope that its also written in Spanish, brail and with a picture. Criminals have won lawsuits before they couldn't read English or read at all.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
27 (
view
)
Why is violence for self defence acceptable by law since you can just run away instead?
Posted:
11/17/2009 8:36:22 AM
Those laws are a complete farce and are already being abused. In Florida, Louisianna and several more you can legally shoot someone "if you are afraid".... That's right afraid there need not be any real threat at all and the person you are afraid of can even be fleeing. this castle doctorine was supposedly meant to address CIVIL suits by criminals injured in things like carjackings, home invasions etc.
There is no reason to not investigate use of force by a civilian, and have civil law modified to clearly state that one cannot sue for damages arising from any act while in commission of a crime. Then legitimate use of force incedents will have no repercussions on a law abiding citizen but will get the crazy dirty harry off the street just like any other criminal.
Sorry, but you're mistaken. Its not just because someone is afraid. The use of deadly force in FL can only be used to stop/prevent a forcable felony (rape, robbery, kidnapping, aggrivated assault/battery, etc). The person has to believe that there is a threat of death or great bodily harm to be justified if it doesn't fall under one of the things listed that constitute a forcible felony. Its also agaisnt the law for a civilian to shoot a fleeing felon, because the threat is over. There's three things needed in order for a crime to take place/attempted. Ability, intent, opportunity. If one of those are missing then its going to be very hard to justify. If someone has the intent and opportunity, but not the ability, how are you going to justify it? If someone has the ability and the opportunity, but not the intent, you can't justify it. Same goes for not having the opportunity. I suggest you read the laws before making claims. Here's FL Statute 776 which talks about the justifiable use of force. I suggest that you read it before saying what the law allows
http://www.flsenate.gov/STATUTES/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=Ch0776/ch0776.htm
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
26 (
view
)
Why is violence for self defence acceptable by law since you can just run away instead?
Posted:
11/17/2009 8:00:45 AM
Because you shouldn't have to run away. If you are doing nothing wrong, why should you have to suffer, in more ways than one, by having to run away? The other person is the one breaking the law, they are in the wrong, and the other person has the right to defend themselves by whatever means neccessary. My state used to require a person to try to retreat first before using deadly force, but they thankfully changed that a coulpe years ago. If you have to ask that question you'll probably never understand anyway
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
66 (
view
)
New Civil War
Posted:
11/17/2009 7:57:03 AM
Those who actually think there will be less than 50 states 20 years from now are fooling themselves
There's 57 states remember? Comrade Obama said so himself.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
58 (
view
)
Suicides increase as foreclosures rise
Posted:
11/16/2009 11:21:16 AM
You are lucky that your company is like that.
Not many workers have jobs (because there aren't many out there) that have a lot of sick/vacation time anymore. And of course - if you are hurt at 22, you haven't had time to work your way up or out into another job. Or rack up months of sick time, for that matter.
I think you are getting the brunt of the responses on this thread because you are, for the most part, showing such a lack of empathy. "I did this, I have that"...that's great. But not everyone is in your position.
You go back and forth from "take any job, some money is better than nothing" - to "if someone takes a job with no or bad benefits it's not my problem". But you don't allow that sometimes - THINGS happen. Sometimes - they happen one after another, no chance to recover from #1 , before #2, #3 and on and on.
Back to the OP's subject though...I think it's awful how desperate people become. I think that we are all so busy looking out for ourselves that the milk of human kindness, that empathy and compassion, are dying out. Oh, I know - it's not true of everyone (and I pray it won't ever be true of me!), but I think it's a lot more prevalent these days.
I'm only 25 and my benefits are from a base level position just walking in the door. I get 4 hours of vacation time and sick time every 2 weeks, as well as 13 paid holidays (which end up being used as vacation time since I normally still put in 40 hours during holiday weeks). It doesn't take long to build time up. I also have the option instead of getting paid overtime to get time off at the overtime rate (1.5 hours for every hour worked)
They reason I have what I do is because I try to be smart with my money and my career. I think long term instead of thinking about making an extra buck right now.
I'm not going back and forth. The orginal job should be a good one and meet the persons needs and have some benefits or pay enough money so that the person won't go under if they have to take a little time off of work. If by chance they lose that job, then getting another job as soon as they can so that they have some income coming in is the best option. I've had multiple things happen back to back before. Because I had money in the bank I was able to survive it
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
55 (
view
)
Suicides increase as foreclosures rise
Posted:
11/16/2009 8:06:00 AM
Post #39
If I got hurt on the job I'd get workers comp, and have a few months worth of sick/vacation time saved so I wouldnt be struggling.
Think so? My son got hurt on the job - Jan. 2, 2008 - and hasn't gotten ANYTHING yet. Except a laywer...and a lot of grief. Almost 2 years now! As for having "months" of sick/vacation time saved up - really? How are you going to do that with a job that gives you NO sick time, and 5 vacations days a year?
I can only speak for me personally. If someone doesn't get a job with any, or bad benefits its not my problem. Thats something that you have to take into concideration when you get the job. I know that my job is good about dealing with workers comp cases. One of my supervisors was out for 6 months, and was on light duty for a few months after that. No problem with getting paid. He's not the only one. I work in a high risk job, and if they try to jerk us around a call to the PBA will straighten them out.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
36 (
view
)
Suicides increase as foreclosures rise
Posted:
11/15/2009 7:52:38 AM
^^^If you got injured at work or were in a debilitating accident and had to go on disability, would you still be able to afford your payments on your $115k mortgage? Depending on what you do for a living, can you keep your home if you lose your ability to make what you do now?
If I got hurt on the job I'd get workers comp, and have a few months worth of sick/vacation time saved so I wouldnt be struggling. If by some reason I lost my job and had to work two to pay the bills I would. I have equity that I could tap into if need be to get me by. You just have to be willing to do something you may not normally be willing to do.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
35 (
view
)
Suicides increase as foreclosures rise
Posted:
11/15/2009 7:46:14 AM
No , actually you're missing the point.
You think that it's simply a question of money management. You think that the reason all these people are in such desperate financial waters is because they're irresponsible and are too stupid to handle their own money or plan in any way. You're completely forgetting about why they can't make their payments. They HAVE NO JOBS ANYMORE ! How are they supposed to pay any of their bills without jobs ? Move to a smaller place ? Well , gee , don't you think that that has occured to people ?
You give people absolutely no credit for common sense. OF COURSE they're going to cut all their costs. Worse , you're assuming they're living in the lap of luxury to begin with. You really don't realize how arrogant you come across as. So YOU made certain choices ... good for you. Some people never had those choices to make in the first place. What I'm willing to bet that your response to them is that they should simply put their enjoyment of life on hold until they're ready to retire.
Not everybody has had any of the opportunities you have. You bought a house when you were nineteen ? Good for you. It's great that YOU had a cosigner to help you do that. Did you work 40 hours a week and go to school at the same time ? Did you try to support a family at the same time ? Did you lose your job and have nowhere to apply to for a job afterwards ?(like millions of people in America today) Could you just go and buy a simpler , cheaper home right now ? How easy would it be to sell your home ? The list of questions is endless. That you assume I'm missing the point when you don't even realize what you yourself are saying is so incredibly precocious , it smacks of elitism and snobbery. You just assume that everybody has led the same life as you and that if they'd just not be so stupid or lazy , they'd be just fine.
Well , go tell them. I wonder what they'll tell you. I suggest you wear padding.
If they had money in savings then they would have money to pay the bills. Remember the whole 3 months of expenses saved up thing? I don't give people credit for common sense because it doesn't exist anymore. There's things that should be common sense, but like the saying goes "Common sense isn't to common anymore". I never said anything about people living in the lap of luxury, but a lot of people today do live beyond theirs means to have a more luxurious lifestyle or to keep up their "image". What choice have people not had the chance to make?
If you read what I wrote, my co-signer was my soon to be wife, so she was my age, and making less money. I have worked full time and gone to school as well as worked two full time jobs. M-F from 7a-330p and Sat, Sun, Mon from 330p- around 2a. I'd leave a little early from my day job on Monday to make it to my other job on time. I'd also go to my night job on Thursday afternoons to get in my full 40 hours. I had a family to support (wife and kid), and a year later when I was at my "career" job I ended up losing it. At the same time we were in the process of moving. With no job, we couldn't get into the place we were supposed to be buying so we lived in an apartment. My wifes aunt had a major stroke and was in a coma, so I stayed at home with our daughter for a month and a half, so my wife could be with family at the hospital. We lived off the equity from the house until I got another job. So yes, I've been through a good bit, and know what I'm talking about when it comes to such matters. I could sell my house and go to something simplier but it would be a mistake, because I paying the simple house price to own a nicer house. As far as selling my house, I've owned it only a few months and have over $50k in equity. I could sell it at a lower price to move it and still make money. It all comes down to making smart financial decisions
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
33 (
view
)
Suicides increase as foreclosures rise
Posted:
11/15/2009 7:27:10 AM
And what if the Bank accelerates their loan because they pay a single payment one day late?
Now the entire amount of the mortgage is due immediately , as well as interest, and (just to rub it in) the Bank's attorney's fees.
If the Bank wants your property, the Bank is going to get your property.
Legally, Banks always win.
You act as if thats the normal thing to happen, but its not. I've never heard of that happening before. When I was married, my ex stayed at home and chose to take care of the bills. More than once she forgot to pay the mortgage. All that happened was the next month we had a double payment with a $35 late fee. Banks don't want to foreclose because they lose money. An example would be the foreclosure that I bought. The last selling price was over $250k. The bank first put it on the market at $160k and I ended up getting it at $115k. Thats over a $135k difference.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
27 (
view
)
Suicides increase as foreclosures rise
Posted:
11/14/2009 11:19:57 AM
^^^You're missing the point. If someone is without income, every little bit helps. Even $10 here and there makes a difference. It all adds up. Its not any one thing that would drive a person to suicide, but everything being additive. If they can't make their bills then they're in trouble. A lot of people are so accustomed to their lifestyle that they have a had time downgrading. Also by a few months of bills in the bank, I mean at their current standard of living. If they were to drop their standard of living from the start then they could probably stretch it out another few weeks depending on how they lived before. Also it could mean working part time, or even full time until they get a job that will pay all of the bills. Some income is better than no income. So even if they got a job paying only half of what they made before, that 3 months of expenses in the bank just became 6 months
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
23 (
view
)
Suicides increase as foreclosures rise
Posted:
11/13/2009 10:14:30 PM
A few months ? I'm sorry but how much disposable income do you think the average home owner has ?
Believe it or not , some people have families to pay for. Then they get crazy luxuries like cars and food. Pretty soon they want electricity and water in their homes. It's just decadence if you ask me but for some folks these things are actually necessary. I don't know what it costs for all of this but I'd imagine that to afford a few months of unpredictable costs associated with possession of these things would drain the vast majority of bank accounts pretty quickly. Of course , it's been more than a few months since the recession set in....maybe they did have the necessary funds (as per your standards) when their employer gave them the pink slip. Now , if they'd just learn to live without luxuries like heat and clothing they'd be in a fine position to whether the economic storm.
What's wrong with some people eh ?
People can cut back in a lot of areas. Instead of going out to eat, cook at home, don't buy the fanciest car you can "afford", catch things on sale. You don't have to have the latest mall fashions, 200+ channels, AC set down real cold in the summer, or the heat up high in the winter. I know people that'll have their heat up a good bit higher than their AC temp is set at in the summer. Figure that one out. Its not about not being able to enjoy these things when/if you can afford them. Its about cutting back when/if you need to. Believe it or not people can survive just fine without having the AC set at 72 or lower, without going to upscale restraunts, without luxery cars, the fanciest clothes, etc.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
21 (
view
)
Suicides increase as foreclosures rise
Posted:
11/13/2009 10:04:11 PM
What a stupid statement that only a 25 year old - who's unlkely to have many responsibilities in life - could make!
Go and read message 12 (excellent post from 1happywoman) and maybe you'll think before you post such nonsense
Stupid? Nonsense? I bought my first house at 19. Granted I had a co-signer (my fiancee at the time). Things didn't work out with me and her, so I moved back in with my parents for a couple years. Now at 25 I bought another house on my own. My truck is paid for, and by the end of the month I should be debt free except for my mortgage, and should have about 4 months of expenses saved up by the middle of summer. Its called being smart with your money. I also have a daughter, that I pay childsupport for. So I have responsibilities in life.
Post 12 doesn't refer to most of the people having problems. Some people do have things come up that you can't really get ready for. Others just use poor judgement. I must have hit a nerve, because it sounds like you're one of those people.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
43 (
view
)
New Civil War
Posted:
11/13/2009 9:05:57 AM
^^^I explained how it could work. I'm sorry if your so closed minded that you can't see it. If we're affected by "global warming" then people up north must of brain freeze rendering them unable to think.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
41 (
view
)
New Civil War
Posted:
11/13/2009 7:40:39 AM
There is not one state in the country which can handle even a little hurricane, or tornadoe, or flood, damage without help from the Feds. Even with all it's: precious metals, high tech industries, tourism, crops, etc, for income California is broke. Less wealthy states are worse off. The days of any state, or small number of states, being able to sustain themselves are long gone. Their own resources, taxes, etc, can't handle the demands from their own populations...let alone the illegal aliens they must deal with. Secession is the wet dream of inbred idiots. It won't happen...not until cow pies become currency.
First off a hurricane is a little different than a flood or tornado in the fact that the hurricane causes both, so its not just a single thing that happens. On topic CA is a bad example, because of how poorly run it is. What you seem to fail to realize is that if a state breaks off from the union then the Federal taxes that were being paid, could not be paid to the state. Therefore increasing that states revenue. Also, states could handle problems how it see's fit. I doubt that TX would pay to take care of illegals, so there's a tax burden that they would no longer have. They can set their own taxes on trading goods overseas, and set guidelines on people accepting government help so that the system wouldn't be so easily abused. It could be done, and would probably be a good place to live unless you're used to government handouts
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
10 (
view
)
Suicides increase as foreclosures rise
Posted:
11/12/2009 4:25:24 PM
Losing ones home/property should never be a reason for losing ones mind, to the point of making the ultimate irrationality of suicide. Maybe it's possible some of these folks have never lived under impoverished conditions, (i.e. homelessness/ghetto upbringing) so the thought of living without, coupled with a lack of coping skills on how to physically deal with loss, leaves them emotionally destitute.
Maybe their loss of hope is motivated by a perception of how/what they 'think' others will think of them. Humility is a hard pill to swallow for some. Either they have no TRUE friends to help them, or some other contributing mental/emotional condition leads them to a fatal decision. So sad. May their relatives and friends find peace in their time of grieving
I think you're right when it comes to a lot of cases. People couldn't think of being without their cellphone with unlimited talk, texting, internet, etc. I was talking with a co-worker about it recently, and how I'd really like to have internet on my phone. He told me that I should get it, but I can't justify spending the money for it. Same with all these fancy cable/direct tv packages, internet, etc. People don't have to have the name brand stuff all the time, but they think that they do. I'm willing to bet that the average American family can easily trim a few hundred from their monthly budget almost instantly by doing without some of these so called "neccessities".
Another problem is people not reading their contracts, or getting sucked into introductory rates. All they see is that big advertises number, and how great it is, but totally miss the one beside it in smaller print.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
104 (
view
)
Next Election and Obama
Posted:
11/12/2009 4:16:30 PM
^^^Yes I have. I've also been in a car accident and didn't get to seek medical care (non-emergency) until it was "after hours", which meant a trip to the ER. I was in and out in a little over an hour. Filled out the paperwork, got "fast tracked", questions, Xrays, discussion, co-pay and out the door. Also if you get decent Drs they are pretty good about keeping their appointment times. They don't triple book just for the money.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
6 (
view
)
Suicides increase as foreclosures rise
Posted:
11/12/2009 2:11:42 PM
Not only that, but its commonsense. The bank can say that you're approved for anything. That doesn't mean you don't pull out a pad of paper and a pen and run through the numbers. I don't know how many times I did that before I bought my house.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
3 (
view
)
Suicides increase as foreclosures rise
Posted:
11/12/2009 12:32:36 PM
People should be smarter with their money and not get to a point where a few months without work puts them completely under. Its not like life insurance pays for suicides
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
22 (
view
)
New Civil War
Posted:
11/12/2009 11:34:49 AM
Anyone still living in a FEMA trailer from Katrina is a leech. There's a difference in a true American and a leech
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
20 (
view
)
New Civil War
Posted:
11/12/2009 10:14:25 AM
You will never see another civil war in this country as long as there is big govt. Hell who in their right mind would want to take on the US military without having any of the same toys they have? What are you gonna do use a sling shot against a tank? Gone are the days of true tea parties and revolutions and successions
I'm willing to bet the most of the military won't be willing to fire an people who were/are American citizens. The military tends to lean to the right, and thats who I think will try to break off from the government if there were to be a civil war
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
101 (
view
)
Next Election and Obama
Posted:
11/12/2009 10:03:59 AM
How much were you out of pocket to fix your finger?
How much do he lose because of lost wages? Even if it was paid due to sick time, its still his time thats being used up that could have been used when he was truly sick and not just sitting there waiting. A days wages would probably come close to covering his premiums for the month, and he'd probably receive bettercare without having to take as much time off of work
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
50 (
view
)
kids today and yesterday
Posted:
11/12/2009 9:53:36 AM
Just about all of the kids today have cell phones, we never had that, if they existed, my father would never pay a cell phone bill for me.
Yes, they are smarter but less creative than we were. My brothers built forts and go karts
So how does the lack of the ability to use basic tools and understand simple concepts make them smarter? Putting a few boards up in a tree isn't creative, neither is building a go-cart unless you come up with something new/different from most of the other things out there. No, they simply don't have the basic knowledge needed to do such things. I heard one who was needing a wrench, call it a screwdriver. I can forgive, not knowing speciality tools, but run of the mill stuff a guy should know, especially if he's driving.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
5 (
view
)
New Civil War
Posted:
11/11/2009 8:36:55 PM
^^^There's been lots of talk on different forums about there possibly being another Civil War in the near future. I think the side that decides to break off will win. They'll either get their session or win get the government to change how it runs things.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
47 (
view
)
kids today and yesterday
Posted:
11/11/2009 8:33:26 PM
^^^I think we are getting lazier as a whole as the generations go on. I also think that there's been a dumbing down of American. There's been technology changes, so obviously younger people will have an edge there, but things that were basic just a decade ago, people can't take of now. I know someone who was into their car, and how fast it was, and this and that, and spend almost an hour trying to figure out why it wouldn't start. Within 5 minutes I had it going, and I'm by no means an automotive expert.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
45 (
view
)
P.P.& Rapists
Posted:
11/11/2009 11:09:17 AM
vast majority? great. "hey yeah we kill some innocent people but what the hell. can't make an omelet without breaking a few eggs. as long was we kill somebody I'll feel better about the whole thing."
how do you think you'd feel if you were one of the innocent ones executed. how do you thing THOSE families would feel"
You act like innocent people die all of the time. The fact remains that they were convicted of that crime for a reason. There has to be substantial evidence. Its not a simple process by any means, there's standards that have to be met
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
39 (
view
)
P.P.& Rapists
Posted:
11/11/2009 9:23:22 AM
^^^ You act like it happens all of the time. It doesn't. Besides with capital punishment there is supposed to be no doubt about the person and the crime that took place
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
5 (
view
)
::COMPELLED TO STEAL::
Posted:
11/11/2009 5:21:10 AM
^^^^Completely agree. Then again, that might think that she spelled it correctly. I've seen all kinds of spelling errors, especially in profiles, from people my age and younger.
Back on topic. Its a lacks of morals and values in todays society. Add that with entitlement and a bit of mens rea (look it up if you have to) and you've got yourself a criminal.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
15 (
view
)
P.P.& Rapists
Posted:
11/10/2009 8:12:30 AM
The question about how many have met a child rapist, and particularly the answer the poster gives, reflects the real problem.
We've all met child rapists. Just because they're not wearing big red signs or haven't been caught, doesn't mean they're not among us. This is not some group of aliens that can't pass for human - they're everywhere. I don't think all men are potential rapists, as was a popular slogan at one extreme. But the mindset reflected in that post represents the other extreme.
I don't mean just passing them on the street, or making small talk with one while you wait for the bus. You don't know what they have done and can't truly see how they behave. Thats the difference. There's a guy at the facility I work at that likes little boys. He had modified his sweat pants to that the elastic wrapped around his genitils. He'd be watching America's Funniest Videos, rocking back and forth, and his setup would allow him to take care of himself hands free. He's a predator even inside the system, seeking out younger or babyfaced people. He can't be rehabilitated. When you actually sit down and talk with one, and see how most of them truly are, then you might understand
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
9 (
view
)
P.P.& Rapists
Posted:
11/10/2009 7:15:23 AM
There's another thread going about child rapist and people taking action into their own hands. Most seem to want to give the rapist a hug and take them by the hand while twaiting for the police to arrive. I wonder how many of them have actually met someone who has sexually abused a child. I'm willing to be very few of them have.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
191 (
view
)
Child rapist - beaten by neighbors
Posted:
11/10/2009 7:08:30 AM
^^^I've seen the system fail. Just because I work in the profession, doesn't mean I think that the system works as it should. My statesment imply that I'm not afraid to stand up for what is right. Some people don't understand anything but physical pain. You can put them in jail/prison, even in isolation, and they wouldn't care.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
36 (
view
)
Strange hobbies/collections
Posted:
11/10/2009 7:04:29 AM
^^^I've got a small collection of the old Avon cologne bottles that were shaped like cars. Never actually used any of it, just interesting cologne bottles. I do have some though that are full or half full.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
188 (
view
)
Child rapist - beaten by neighbors
Posted:
11/9/2009 10:59:28 PM
^^^Its not about being weak. Its about emotion taking over. Its about fight or flight. Natural human reactions. Let it be your kid, and your the one who catches the person in the process or the first one to find him afterwards and see what you do.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
30 (
view
)
Strange hobbies/collections
Posted:
11/9/2009 10:49:03 PM
How long ago did you get your FFL? From my understanding its hard to do now, and they want you to have a storefront and other stuff to show that its a business. Also whats the cost on the manufacturing license if you don't mind me asking? I like the the supershorty shotgun, but the price is way to high for what it is. Its taxstamp is only $5 under the AOW, but the gun itself shouldn't be more than $400 for what it is.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
356 (
view
)
for the gun control people
Posted:
11/9/2009 10:42:55 PM
Wow. That's quite a list.
There has only been one incident of a school shooting in Australia... ever.
This happened at Monash University in Melbourne in 2002, when a mentally-disturbed overseas student arrived with several handguns and began shooting up a lecture. 2 students were killed. When he stopped to change weapons he was restrained by the injured lecurer and tackled to the ground by the lecturer and two students. All three received bravery awards.
When it was discovered the shooter had obtained the guns legally, what did the Victorian and Australian governments do? Changed the law and instituted a 'buyback' scheme to make it ever tougher to get handguns.
I fully understand the culture is different in the US, you're guarenteed your right to guns, but I would rather live where I live, where my kids can go to school and only have to worry about their grades.
In all of those instances in that big list, those guns had to come from somewhere, and, at least in the case of the Columbine killers, the guns belonged to their parents.
Firearms aren't allowed in school zones in the US. I guess someone forgot to tell the criminals that. Oh wait, the school shooters where mostly kids, who were breaking the law just by having it in their possession, not to mention how the obtained the firearms or ammo, which you have to be over 18 to buy. There's also laws in place about proper firearm storage to keep them out of the hands of children. Now the guns didn't do any of this. People breaking the law did. So its obviously (you'd think so anyway) the persons fault and not that of an inanimate object.
As far as the shooting there that you mentioned, I applaud those that stepped in to do something. At least they were willing to act.
fl co
Joined:
12/23/2008
Msg:
26 (
view
)
Strange hobbies/collections
Posted:
11/9/2009 10:19:27 PM
^^^I'd want it just for the lower. I'd set it up to be more modern. There's other stuff I'd want to but the M16 would probably be the most versatile.
Show ALL Forums