REGISTER
|
MAIL/PROFILE
|
HELP
|
NOW ONLINE
|
SEARCH
|
RATING
| FORUMS |
SUCCESS STORIES
Posted In Forum:
All Forums
Alabama
Alaska
Alberta
Arizona
Arkansas
Art/Music
Ask A Girl
Ask A Guy
Australia
British Columbia
Broken Hearts
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Dating & Love Advice
Dating Experiences
Dating Sites
Delaware
District Of Columbia
Event Hosts forum
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Health & Fitness
Humor
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Introductions
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Manitoba
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Brunswick
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
Newfoundland
News/Current Events
North Carolina
North Dakota
Nova Scotia
Off Topic
Ohio
Oklahoma
Ontario
Oregon
Over 30
Over 45
Pennsylvania
Plentyoffish Get Togethers
Plentyoffish Site/Suggestions/Help
Poems And Quotes
Politics
Prince Edward Island
Profile Reviews
Quebec
Recipes & Cooking
Relationships
Religion/Supernatural
Rhode Island
Saskatchewan
Science/Philosophy
Sex and Dating
Single Parents
South Carolina
South Dakota
Sports
Stories/creative writing
Technology and computers
Tennessee
Testimonials
Texas
Uk Forums
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Volunteer Moderators Only
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Home
login
MyForums
Show ALL Forums
Author
Thread: What's with the baby pics for women in their 50s
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
9 (
view
)
What's with the baby pics for women in their 50s
Posted:
8/27/2009 7:04:10 PM
Just because you don't like grandmothers doesn't mean there's those who don't.
I always try to keep Dylan's "Rainy Day Women" in mind, when I post a thread on POF. You know, the one that goes "they'll stone you when you're riding in your car, .....I would not feel so all alone, everyone must get stoned".
I don't "dislike" grandmothers. I've dated several over the past few years. I have a 26 and 21 year old daughter, so I "could" be a grandfather.
The question was about posting pictures with grandchildren on a dating site, because it make me curious about what message is intended. It wasn't a "slam" on anyone....just "wondering".
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
1 (
view
)
What's with the baby pics for women in their 50s
Posted:
8/25/2009 5:52:49 PM
I love kids.. I have two daughters, who are the light of my life, and when they have children, I have little doubt that I'll be thrilled.
Still, I'm really curious about what seems to be a new trend amongst women in their 50s, to have pictures holding their infant grandchildren. This is a dating site, and it seems to detract, a bit, from seeing them as "youthful" and sensual, when attention is drawn to grandchildren visually.
It's not that big a deal. Just more curiousity than anything else. I just wonder what message is intended with those sorts of pictures?
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
232 (
view
)
Leagues do not exist
Posted:
8/24/2009 8:21:09 PM
a functional society must practice it when ever it can to make that society a better place. Believing and convincing yourself about the need for "leagues" merely cements the pecking order and mentality of privilege that is killing our current societies.
People are attracted to those of the opposite sex for reasons that have nothing to do with "political correctness" or "building a better world". It hss ever been thus, from the dawn of time.
It is what it is, partly animal instinct, when you come right down to it. I really don't care what "should" matter in terms of "ideals". I'm either attracted, or I'm not, and I assume that, no matter what "nice" things they say, it's much the same for women.
Those who have gained wisdom from life experience, will know who is likely to be recirprocally interested, and who is unlikely to be "interested". One can complain that "it's not fair", but each of us gets to decide for himself/herseelf, if there is enough initial attraction to warrant "getting to know" each other.
It's not complex, or difficult. I''m not going to want to "get to know" a woman unless she is physically attractive to me, and 'turns me on". Likewise, I don't expect a woman to have an interest in me, if I don't "turn her on". I have a pretty good sense of who might be interested in me, who I find "interesting". It is among those women who seem to be, reaalistic possibilities, that I have sought and found relationships.
If others choose to ignore the obvious factors of attraction, so be it. Most of them are frustrated by the process, simply because they refuse to accept reality.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
141 (
view
)
good body or face?
Posted:
8/24/2009 6:35:09 PM
don't find extremely thin men attractive. Many men prefer curves on a woman. We all have our preferences.
Absolutely. Otherwise, 100% of the men would be interested in only 5% of the women, or vice versa, and the human race would go extinct. My preferences are far from universal, but they are undeniably what they are, and, for me, there is no point in dating someone, if there isn't mutual physical attraction.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
229 (
view
)
Leagues do not exist
Posted:
8/24/2009 3:59:20 PM
The concept of "Leagues" is created by people who feel the constant need to "validate" or "value-ate" them selves against other people in life.
It is a fool that practices the concept of Leagues, but a bigger fool that does not achnowledge that the weak in society think that way. One easy way to tell the herd from the free thinkers I suppose.
Through life experience, most people gain a realistic sense of those who are likely to be interested in them, based on the combination of looks, social status, education, income, and occupation, and who they are likely to find interesting using the same criteria. Most successful relationships are formed with that as a basis. Approaching ONLY those who we perceive to be "better" looking, more successful, and with higher social status, trying to deny that such things do, or should, matter, is the way to end up dating no one at all.
Call that "leagues", or something else. It's merely applying one's life experience to one's current circumstances and remaining grounded in reality.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
134 (
view
)
good body or face?
Posted:
8/23/2009 8:52:30 PM
If she's got a hot face (not just 'oh, she's pretty...'), requiring no baggage in real life -- there's about a 99.9% chance she's not significantly overweight.
Likewise, if she's thin and "tight", it's rare that she doesn't have an attractive face.
In any case, for me, it all starts with overall weight. I can't think of a thin woman I've seen in the recent past, who wasn't, overall, very attractive facially. Nor can I think of a single time, in recent memory, where an overweight woman has seemed attractive to me.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
1059 (
view
)
Why women want guys to come to THEM
Posted:
8/23/2009 8:05:39 PM
Do you think that happens often at this day and age? Back in the old days it was the case. These days, one pay check isn't enough for most families. Thats when childcare comes into it and that's why it's difficult to get your children in a place in childcare facilities. You are just about 60 years old, you are talking about your generation.
The last statistic I saw was that, in the United States, about 40% of married couples, the mom stays home at least through the first 2 years of a child's life.
Yes, it can be an economic strain, for those who aren't prepared in advance. On the other hand, when one factors in the cost of "baby day care", it often doesn't make sense economically, for the mom to go back to work right away.
At least in the U.S., it's not uncommon, and when a woman is a "stay at home mom", the norm is that, while she's at home, that she chooses to fulfill the "traditional" role, which was what you asked about earlier.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
1057 (
view
)
Why women want guys to come to THEM
Posted:
8/23/2009 7:31:20 PM
I think most women at this day and age would refuse to do a man's dishes or his house work because he believes its her traditional responsibility. On the other hand, these same women and many others expect a man to pay for dates because they think its a man's traditional responsibility. It wouldn't be considered a turn off if a woman showed an attitude against traditional responsibilities that favoured men but it's somehow a turn off if a man has an attitude towards traditional responsibilities that favour women. I wonder why?
In the real world, where people make decisions based on what makes sense, rather than someone's "philosophy of equality", about 40% of married couples having children decide that it's best for the children, if "mom" stays home with the kids.
I know that was the situation with my ex, as our daughters grew up. And, as a natural consequence, she did take care of the traditional things inside the home. There was never any feeling on my part that I had the more "important" role, because I was the one earning a paycheck. Our daughters came first, and the money coming in was "our" money. On the other hand, she never complained about the traditional things that a stay at home mom does. As a consequence, there was never any friction over petty things through a 20 year marriage.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
1048 (
view
)
Why women want guys to come to THEM
Posted:
8/23/2009 6:30:24 PM
ROFL so in other words I am emotionally unavailable and I have unresolved issues all because I want equal and fair treatment with women? Seriously, can it get any more simplistic than this?
Having a positive and open mind is believing in equality and fairness instead of expecting privileges. Expecting privileges is having a negative/sexist outlook in dating.
Last comment on this, because it's boring, redundant, and too petty to discuss.
When I call up a guy friend, to meet for lunch or have a couple of beers at a Sports
Bar, I intend to pick up the tab. Over time, most of my friends will do the same, but who cares? I don't keep score, and don't worry about petty things.
Your focus on this issue, including the implications of your screen name, make it seem that you're so focused on your version of "equality" that you can't see the forest for the trees.
When you're meeting a woman for the first time, what's important. For you, apparently, it's "who pays?". For me, it's about "is there chemistry?" The last thing I care about is "who picks up the tab?". I do the inviting, so I expect to pay, and in the grand scheme of things, it's "no big deal".
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
128 (
view
)
good body or face?
Posted:
8/23/2009 6:22:01 PM
A very pretty face can't hardly ever be had unless she's got at least a close-to-average body.
As many of the "head shot only" profiles will bear out, there are women with pretty faces, who are significantly overweight. For me, that's the "deal breaker".
On the other hand, a woman who isn't a great beauty, facially, but who has a thin, sexy figure can get me all hot and bothered pretty easily.
So, for me, it's 99% her body, and 1% her face.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
1045 (
view
)
Why women want guys to come to THEM
Posted:
8/23/2009 6:08:31 PM
So why does this "cultural norm" stay and the "cultural norms" that privilege men are forbidden? Why do women get to keep their traditional benefits while men have to give up theirs?
Why is it not acceptable for men to complain about paying for a date but it is acceptable for a woman to complain about men believing that they shouldn't pay for dates?
Quite simply, if your interest is in fighting a "gender war" over minor things, you aren't really emotionally available to make a meaningful connection. Your post tells me that you have "unresolved issues" with women in your past. So long as that's the case, you will be more focused on "evening" the "score" from past relationships, rather than entering into meeting someone new with a positive, open mind.
Who cares about "who pays?" for coffee, or dinner at a mid level restaurant. Unless you're living in a cardboard box, you easily piss away the $5 for coffee for two on a daily basis.
Let the small stuff slide, dude. It just doesn't matter.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
84 (
view
)
Long Distance Relationships?
Posted:
8/23/2009 3:52:16 PM
I actually have been through two of them, and we both survived intact. Got married, actually :)
Long distance relationships don't usually work out, which is not the same as saying that they "never" work out. In the 10 years since my marriage, I've had 52 "first meets" from online, or dates made in the real world. Of those, only 6 rose to the level of being ongoing "dating relationships" that lasted a year or more.
Half of those started out as long distance relationships, and half as geographically close ( 2 hours or less of travel). There is no substantive difference in the end results, and the fact is, near or far, finding that "one person" with whom to have a relationship that lasts til death us do part, has so far eluded me.
There are several forumites, who ended up married to someone who was a "long distance relationship" to start. In one case, the woman is a college professor in Wales, and he was in Canada. Apparently, so far so good two years later.
It's a challenge, and a big one, but far better, in my experience, to have a good connection with someone you only see twice a month, than to have a bad connection with the "girl next door".
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
1038 (
view
)
Why women want guys to come to THEM
Posted:
8/23/2009 3:26:01 PM
why do women use the lame excuse of expressing that if the man does the asking out or makes the approach one way or the other, he has to pay for the date?
Men pay for the first date, because it's the cultural norm. I'm not interested in debating the issue with anyone. Those for whom it's a big deal, on "principle", about who pays for coffee, have "issues" and enter into dating wit a chip on their shoulders.
I don't care about making a point. If I'm meeting someone, it's in the anticipation that it might turn out to lead to a relationship. The cost of a cup of coffee, or even a dinner at Applebee's, is inconsequential in comparison to the potential reward of finding a meaningful connection.
Same thing with who "goes" to whom. It's a cultural norm for men to assume that burden initially. Those who are more interested in making a meaningless point about the social issue of "equality" in a social situation, are, IMO, being foolish.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
17 (
view
)
Odd favorites issue
Posted:
8/23/2009 9:29:57 AM
The Favs count has been removed from our profiles. Hallelujah. I thought it would never happen (miracles "do" occur...lol). It was by far the single, biggest irritation for many, so needed to go.
Wish they bring back "Last 5 forums posts", though. I never received even one complaint about it from anyone.
As several people have noted, this post is off topic. For those who want to talk about the favs list or last 5 posts, here is the thread that is currently running about those topics:
http://forums.plentyoffish.com/datingPosts12990074.aspx
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
1032 (
view
)
Why women want guys to come to THEM
Posted:
8/23/2009 8:26:53 AM
Zangie--Just as a practical matter...if we are talking distance..it would be foolish for a woman to travel a long distance for a first meet..safety issue?
I have traveled to meet men...and still would. But, as a woman, you have to be careful not to do it all, and give too much , and not expect anything in return...because then they don't think they need to?
1. For safety reasons, as well as traditional courtesy, I agree that it should be the man who travels to meet the first time. Men and women are different in more ways than just plumbing, and there are some things that are the role of a "natural man", and that involves leading the way in taking the small risks in early dating like: giving out his phone #, divulging his first and last names (so she can do some preliminary research, if that makes her feel safer), and taking on the burden of travel, etc..
2. IMO, Zangie, a relationship will only develop if both people are open and giving without keeping score. If someone is aware of how much she is "giving" and trying to measure how "equal" it is, it will never even out. Men and women give of themselves in different ways, and there's no way to objectively measure it.
Besides which, as with friends, it only works when what you give is freely given, hoping only that it will bring something good to the other. If "giving" is in anticipation of "getting" something, then it's an "agenda". Yes, if at some point, after freely giving of self, and realizing that the other doesn't seem to giving of himself/herself, you've found out that a relationship isn't going to work with that person.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
29 (
view
)
last 5 forum posts.. gone.
Posted:
8/23/2009 6:14:07 AM
I can usually understand the business reason that Admin changes things he does. In the case of listing the number of favorites and the last 5 forum posts, I really can't come up with a theory.
Following someone's forum posts was the reason that most people were on my favorites list, or I was on theirs. As candid1 mentioned, some people seem to consistently find interesting threads, and checking posts of my favorites was a good way to find good threads.
It doesn't make all that much difference in the grand scheme of things, of course, but those were nice features, and I'm sorry to see them gone.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
15 (
view
)
not understanding this at all
Posted:
8/23/2009 6:01:29 AM
Came to my house 2x. The last time he was there, he stayed for like 5 hours, yeah, we kissed but no sex. Now, I havent heard from him,
OP, first, one of the reasons for dating is to discover if you "fit" together. It's not uncommon for men to "disappear", if they find that the relationship isn't working for them. Just do a thread search on "disappearing man", and you'll find many posts on that topic.
I'm not sure this is it, but many people have some variation of the "3 date rule" in the back of their minds. A lot of people won't say anything about it, but if sex doesn't just naturally happen, they just stop calling. Your description of what went on between you, when he was at your house, could well be such a situation.
Whether that, or something else, if he doesn't want to talk about it, you'll never really know "why" he stopped calling. It's frustrating, of course, to be left hanging and not "know", but sometimes, that's the way things work out.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
56 (
view
)
when are standards too high?
Posted:
8/23/2009 5:37:07 AM
spicynicegirl--There is no point dropping your standards, whatever they may be.
There can be a "point" to adjusting one's standards, when there are no others available, who meet those standards.
Some things can't be compromised. Physical attractiveness is what it is, and if you aren' t at all attracted to someone, there's no point to dating him/her. Other things, though, are merely preferences, which could be "adjusted".
For example, if your preference is to find someone who lives within 25 miles, and you haven't found anyone suitable in 3 months, how critical is that really? I found, when I first joined POF, that there were only 17 women, who lived within 25 miles, only two of which I found to be "attractive". Neither of them were interested. So, I "adjusted" to what the "market" was telling me, and expanded my geographical preferences to 200 miles, and found that there were more women than I could ever possibly even look at, let alone try to contact. In the ensuing two years, I had many "first meets" and two "live with" relationships that lasted longer than a year.
Having certain "absolutes" is fine, so long as they don't have the effect of "excluding" everyone. Knowing what those are and why is critically important. However, not every preference is an "absolute", and some preferences can be adjusted, if you are sincere about wanting to meet someone.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
204 (
view
)
Leagues do not exist
Posted:
8/23/2009 5:23:43 AM
When my parents first started dating, my mom was pretty and my dad was dorky.
I'm willing to bet that a few people told my dad that my mom was out of his league.
It's a good thing he didn't listen.
Exceptions do happen, but, when they do, they result from interaction between two people in the "real" world.
In an experiment that has been replicated many times by sociology grad students, if you randomly select a group of people, equally divided between men and women, and then assign a grade to their physical attractiveness from 1-10 and then put them in a room, they pair off predictably. The 10s will find the other 10s, the 5s will pair off with 5s, etc..
While there are compensating factors, such as great wealth, celebrity, power, etc.; the vast majority of people who are exposed to a lot of strangers of the opposite sex will select someone who is close to his/her equal on the attractiveness scale. Online, obviously, is much like walking into a singles bar, and like will usually pair off with like.
The "2s" who will ONLY attempt to contact "10s" will find the whole process frustrating, and will often be found posting "why don't women answer my email?" on the Ask a Girl forum. Or, often, they will post the "why can't a nice guy find a woman?" threads.
Developing a "feel" for who is, and who isn't, likely to be interested is something most people develop through life experience. Most people who are successfully dating from online kind of "just know" who might be interested. Those who insist on "trading up", or going out of their league, are the ones who can be found moaning, griping, whining, and complaining, insisting that the opposite sex is "shallow" or that "online dating doesn't work".
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
10 (
view
)
I need help.. or advice, I dont know
Posted:
8/23/2009 5:03:39 AM
OP, there were too many things that are vague in your OP to really offer much in the way of constructive comments. If she moved in with you 3 weeks after you first met her "due to circumstances", it may well indicate that she is dysfunctional in terms of supporting herself. That you say that you're both "ill" with "issues" yet to be resolved, could mean anything.
If her issues, or yours, are emotional/psychological in nature, the simple truth is that "two sick people together don't get better" usually. Some emotional/psychological issues would explain why she's "cheating" on someone else by seeing you, and why, when she was with you, she cheated on you.
The only thing I can tell for sure from the OP is that this is a dysfunctional, perhaps toxic, relationship, and that you'd be better off without her in your life.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
84 (
view
)
Exclusive dating???
Posted:
8/22/2009 9:18:21 PM
it happens...in my experience, the guys that press for exclusivity early on are the ones still looking.
If you have to "press", it's not worth having. When the pieces fit, it's a very natural, simple, and exclusive focus. I've dated a lot in my life, and had a fair number of relationships. Never once has there been a need to have a formal "talk" about exclusivity. It's pretty simple. Yo want to date others, fine, I don't have any problem with that, except that I won't be part of it.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
79 (
view
)
Exclusive dating???
Posted:
8/22/2009 12:39:55 PM
If you mean you can't date two people on different days and give them your attention at that time, then it's no different than saying you can't have two friends in your life period because having more than one takes away from knowing the other.
I fail to see the "logic" in that statement. Dating someone, in anticipation of forming a relationship, is completely different from any other friendship. It's monogamous by nature, and requires, IMO, a singular focus. In fact if, there isn't strong chemistry to start, that makes you NOT want to be dating anyone else, then, in my experience, there is zero potential for it be "the one" that most people seek.
You simply can't be "in love" with more than one person romantically. If you think you are, then you're not in love with either, or any, of them. So, for me, that initial infatuation, that is exclusive by nature, is a key component of it ever becoming "serious", and I wouldn't date someone, who is dating others, nor would I date more than one at a time.
It's not as if it takes all that long to figure out if someone you're seeing is someone in whom you're interested for the long term. Often, the first meet results in "one and done". At most, you know after 3 dates, which shouldn't involve more than a week or two. Why stretch it out over weeks or months, hoping that "lightning will strike" later? It never does. If there is no "there" there, then you simply move on, after "losing" what? A week or two?
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
6 (
view
)
criminalizing consensual sex
Posted:
8/20/2009 4:25:40 PM
OP, societal norms are what they are, and most people embrace the belief that sex is part of, and the point of, to some degree, for dating. Do some people "disapprove"? Of course, but they are a smaller minority, and aren't about to pass any laws making sex illegal.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
4 (
view
)
The economy and dating
Posted:
8/20/2009 4:22:52 PM
OP, out of every 100 people, 9 are out of work and looking, whereas a year ago it was 6 out of 100. For those who are employed, most people aren't really "hurting", nor does dating present any greater economic challenge than it did a year ago.
Of course, if you're one of those who is out of work, and looking for a job, that pretty much defines everything in life.
So, no, I'm not feeling any economic "pinch". I'm actually doing better now than I was a year ago, when it comes to economics.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
224 (
view
)
What motivates you to look for a relationship?
Posted:
8/20/2009 4:19:38 PM
oblivion77--Maybe because it's 'the thing to do'. The normal thing, the expected thing. Don't know what else to do? Lonely sometimes. Miss sex. It feels weird to think there's nobody who really cares about you. All of the above? Who knows?
In the moment, this post really hits home. It capsulizes a lot of my current feeling on the subject.
Ordinarily, or up til now, I am far more proactive about it, and have always been more sexually driven than in need of "companionship". That "hard driving" need just isn't as intense, nor do I feel overwhelmed with loneliness. Still, dating is the "normal" thing, the "expected thing", so I have been doing it, just not with the intensity that has always been my norm.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
9 (
view
)
When will it happen for me?
Posted:
8/18/2009 8:28:58 PM
The bad news, OP, is that you are the common denominator in this. If you are picking felons and abusers, then you have to look within to find what it is that makes you choose such men. The good news is that you're only 19, and didn't marry or make a baby with one of the low lifes you've invited into your life, so you can change your results, and look forward to making better choices in the future.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
207 (
view
)
What motivates you to look for a relationship?
Posted:
8/18/2009 6:17:03 PM
ren, sometimes when the "rowing" gets tough, it's time to let the boat drift--in essence, letting go.
Oh, I know that, in my head, serenity. It's just that "not dating", and not having someone in prospect, would feel really weird. In actuality, there is someone, who seems fascinating on one level, but impossible to imagine in a dating relationship. So, maybe I'll content myself with seeing someone as "friends" That's a concept that I've always resisted, but maybe it's time to try something different, and see where the journey leads? :)
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
30 (
view
)
Single after 25 years
Posted:
8/18/2009 6:13:31 PM
POF is for mainly people who want a chat friend or to play around on the forums. People do meet here and click but I think they are in the minority. I've noticed those who couple up tend to be living in large cities or willing to relocate.
If a "deal breaker" requirement is that someone must live close, like within 1/2 hour drive, an international website is probably not a great choice. A small, more localized site would be the way to go, in that situation.
I've made a lot of first meets, and had a couple of relationships that lasted over a year from POF, but, initially, the ones that turned into relationships were about 2 hours away. I've met women from here that involved a bit of travel, and if that's out of the question, it might not work for you.
Personally, I'd rather deal with distance, if it means meeting someone who is "well matched", rather than having to make all the compromises that might be necessary, were I to make geogrpahical proximity the priority.
However, lots of people are meeting and dating in the real world from this site. It is decidedly NOT just for those who are looking for "chat partners".
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
27 (
view
)
Should I make a move?
Posted:
8/18/2009 5:26:33 PM
OP, given what you've shared about you, I think that you accomplished a lot. She defined that she's thinking of you in relationship terms, and that's about the best possible outcome.
Don't screw it up by overthinking. Things will develop naturally from here, if you don't screw it up by overanalyzing it. In essence, this is a "first love" for you, and possibly for her too.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
16 (
view
)
Should I make a move?
Posted:
8/18/2009 4:51:17 AM
The date was supposed to have been last night, I think. It will be interesting to see if the OP will come back and let us know how it turned out.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
22 (
view
)
Single after 25 years
Posted:
8/18/2009 4:48:50 AM
3-4 to one guys is the norm. A lot higher in certain demographic groups.
For instance; men without children vs women without : About 8 to 1
Statistics about how many members there are of each gender are misleading, and self-defeating, if you focus on them. Remember "back in the day", where everywhere that men went to meet women, there were always more men than women, like in the singles bars?
When you get right down to those who are really motivated to meet in the real world, the numbers tend to even out. Men who are putting some effort into it, seem to be making dates from this site.
For those who aren't making an effort, it wouldn't matter if there were 5 women to every man. They still wouldn't make a connection.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
202 (
view
)
What motivates you to look for a relationship?
Posted:
8/17/2009 5:46:45 PM
I do know that when you're with the "right" person it should be easy.
When you really fit, I think it is. A lot of what makes people averse to wanting a relationship, I think comes from the times we've tried to "talk ourselves into" continuing to date someone, when it's not easy and natural. Finding that "perfect fit" isn't really something that any of us can "make happen", so we try to fit square pegs into round holes, and it almost never works. And, then, because it doesn't, we start to "give up" on the whole thing.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
48 (
view
)
when are standards too high?
Posted:
8/17/2009 4:46:58 PM
--goodewitchbeth---Your standards are too high if you're a two and you're messaging tens.
I'm glad it was a woman who was that direct, but it's the essence of things, really. Some people view online with a "catalog" mentality, and have the delusion that if a profile is there, that it's "for sale", and all they need do is "point and click" and proceed to checkout.
The reality is that the people most likely to be interested are those who are very similar to those with whom you've had relationships in real life. It's a just a venue for being exposed to a lot of people of the opposite sex, but very few "upgrade" successfully.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
41 (
view
)
Venting - but would love some advice to ground me
Posted:
8/17/2009 4:18:37 PM
If you don't have the "perfect" relationship, often living together will ruin what might have been a "good" relationship, while living apart.
http://forums.plentyoffish.com/datingPosts12668044.aspx
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
13 (
view
)
Single after 25 years
Posted:
8/17/2009 4:10:07 PM
actually i think pof is a great place to meet some really fantastic gals. i admit i am prejudiced because all my pof experiences have been good ones, but i cant say enough about the gals on pof
POF works just fine, if you approach it with a good attitude and reasonable expectations. Shrug off the stuff that doesn't matter, like unanswered emails, or that you're talking to someone a few times, and she stops answering. Who cares? If you just keep at it, it doesn't take all that long to make a connection that leads to real life meeting.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
199 (
view
)
What motivates you to look for a relationship?
Posted:
8/17/2009 3:14:41 PM
serenitycw---this is one things that, for me, seeks a path of least resistance and commands a gentle journey that winds through life as a creek winds through valleys amidst mountains and hills. for me, it's a very personal and intimate journey. i hope to share my path with another and be trusted with knowing his. the intertwining will be interesting and soothing and often exciting.
That's a beautiful word picture, serenity. It's been a long, long time, though, since I've had a relationship that felt like that. All the way back to college, to be honest. It's nice to imagine being with someone who brings greater peace into life, and a heightened sense of adventure about a journey shared.
Unfortunately, it hasn't been that simple or serene, and compainionship has often led to the feeling of having no personal space. That's part of the disincentive, really.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
2 (
view
)
Single after 25 years
Posted:
8/16/2009 9:21:41 PM
If you approach it with a defeatist attitude, you will meet your negative expectations. The reality is, though, that all the polls show that for people over 30, the most common way that people in relationships cite as how they met is online dating sites.
It's not simple or easy, but as a man, at 59, I've found that you can find someone compatible online, within 6 weeks or so. It only works out, once you get to real life, about one in three times. Still, if you're motivated to have a relationship, most people can find one within 6 months.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
2 (
view
)
what do you do when your wife is no longer interested in sex?
Posted:
8/16/2009 7:23:12 PM
If she is a Christian, you could show her that refusing sex to one's partner in marriage is just as much a violation of the marriage covenant as would be infidelity.
Whether she is Christian, or not, if she's not interested, it would seem to open the door to justifying you looking elsewhere, or leaving the marriage. She's being selfish and dismissive, so why would you want to remain in a marriage like that?
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
98 (
view
)
my kids don't need a father, they already have one
Posted:
8/16/2009 7:18:15 PM
Now that the mods seemed to have come in and cleaned up this thread, the topic is about women putting "my children don't need a father, they already have one" on one's profile.
There seem to be a lot of women who insist that men reading that "should" understand what they mean, and a lot of men explaining to women that it's seen as a negative. There are several women, who seem to insist that men are "wrong" for having the visceral response that many do. Nothing new about women telling men that they're wrong.
Nothing new, either, in "female logic" that is based on "I think, THEREFORE, IT IS"
The greater point, for everyone, is that if something is expressed as a negative, it rarely brings a positive response.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
38 (
view
)
when are standards too high?
Posted:
8/16/2009 7:13:34 PM
I pretty much agree with you as far as attraction goes. I'm a pretty instinctual person myself, and if I feel no attraction, I can't change that. Even a person's scent can determine if the match is successful. If you don't like someone's natural scent (at rest), that's not a good sign. I bet you already knew that. ;)
By shallow, I meant more like if a person MUST be a spot on measurement, a certain hair colour or you won't give them the time of day, etc.
I stand corrected, then, equusreined, although the point on which we agree is one that is frequently disputed. A lot of people, especially those without pictures, seem to disdain that physical attraction should matter. The simple truth is that it does, and without it, there's not much point in dating someone.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
33 (
view
)
when are standards too high?
Posted:
8/16/2009 6:44:52 PM
are they based solely on shallow, physical things?
Physical attraction is not "shallow". It's instinctive, and without attraction, it's difficult, or imposssible, to have a meaningful relationship. People dismiss that at their peril, and attraction factors are the ones that are hardest to change.
One can modify geographical distance requirements, for example. Expanding the radius from 25 miles to 75 will expand the list of possibles 10 fold. One can expand age limits a little, or let go of other, relatively minor things on his/her wish list.
Very few of us, though, could have a relationship with someone who isn't attractive to us. So, it's far from "shallow".
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
10 (
view
)
The marrying type?
Posted:
8/16/2009 5:43:16 PM
How do you describe the marying type when it comes to the opposite sex. I may like a guy and then I try to picture a future with him and I never can see that future quite wel enough because I don't know if he could hack it or not or if we would even last.
OP, I don't think you mean the "marrying kind", as in the ones who have been married 5 times.
In terms of the ones who might be open to it, at the appropriate point in a relationship, it's hard to know in the beginning of a new relationship. For example, I've had many relationships in life, but have only been married one time. That lasted 20 years. It's a step that, to me, is a major life committment, and not one entered into quickly. For me, a relationship would have had to have matured, to be good and solid after 2 years, before I would marry again. No relationship for me, post divorce, has looked like it would support marriage, even those that still continued past 2 years.
Far better to hesitate to marry, IMO, than to marry in haste, and become part of the statistic that 65% of second marriages end up in divorce.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
2 (
view
)
Have you tried a work/travel combination?
Posted:
8/16/2009 5:06:27 PM
OP, the most obvious examples would be those in the service industries, who go to vacation areas to work for the season, then return North to work in the summer.
I don't think that there are many "career positions", where you could do that, although I'd love to hear about possibilities. :)
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
191 (
view
)
What motivates you to look for a relationship?
Posted:
8/16/2009 4:31:25 PM
It's interesting for me personally to see the progression from March until now in terms of my thoughts about what motivates me to date. In reality, the current answer would be "not much".
In a way, it feels weird not to be dating, so I did this week, but the truth is, my heart's just not in it. I don't need "companionship", nor do I want another relationship that is based, primarily, on meeting mutual sexual need.
There was a thread, now deleted, that was focused on people losing their motivation to date. Yet, even now, at 59, I feel as if there is something wrong, if I don't date, yet no positive motivation to work real hard to find someone.
That's a new place for me to be.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
53 (
view
)
Why doesnt he wanna meet me?
Posted:
8/16/2009 4:10:05 PM
I learned my lesson, way back, when I spent 3 months, and got hooked into one of those "virtual relationships" that can seem so real. She wss never "quite ready", for one reason or another. Then, almost 4 months into it, I got a phone call from her husband, who had stumbled across our emails, and found my number on her cell phone bill.
Turns out, the whole life she had presented was a fake. It was all just a bored housewife's fantasy. In addition to the emotional toll that took, those are 4 months of my life that I'll never get back.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
9 (
view
)
POF Advertising a Scam
Posted:
8/16/2009 1:26:07 PM
POF makes millions of dollars per year. There is no excuse for them not filtering the ads that come here.
You have access to the books, so as to know what the P&L statement looks like? Or is that just something you pulled out of the air?
In any case, if you don't like the way POF conducts it's business, why are you here?
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
15 (
view
)
my bloke of 4 years found met someone on here and now i dont know what to do
Posted:
8/16/2009 12:45:14 PM
I'm sorry for your pain. However, there is no relationship question here to which to respond. It's a "broken hearts" post perhaps?
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
30 (
view
)
when are standards too high?
Posted:
8/16/2009 10:57:19 AM
Diamonddingleberry-- when are standards too high?
When you are consistently on at least one dating website with millions of members for more than 3 months and you've really never gone out with anyone more than twice.
Either your standards are too high, or you simply have chosen your career over your social life (because you don't have time to use the dating site or date).
That's it in a nutshell. Online dating is a perfect market, where your "offer" (y0urself) is evaluated by the "buyers" ( those who are, or aren't, interested in your offer). If there are no "takers" amongst those who meet your "standards", then the market is telling you that your standards are too high.
You can either adjust to the market, by changing the standards that aren't that important, or you can decide not to date. Your offer, in the end, is "worth" what the market dictates, not what you wish for.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
882 (
view
)
Why women want guys to come to THEM
Posted:
8/16/2009 10:06:57 AM
"The bottom line is, females don't have anything to offer a man but SEX because he doesn't need anything else BEING STRONG AND SELF-SUFFICIENT, so whatever she offers other than sex (caringness, emotional connections, etc) is useless. She instinctively knows this and feels humiliated about it, so seeks to pretend she has something to offer, so if males don't see THAT, but instead get happiness from sex, voila, she's pissed.
WHOA!!
I'm the first one to be "reactive", when women say that men who are interested in sex, should go find a prostitute. But, if that quote cited at the top is a guy's attitude, he really should focus on finding intimate encounters with women looking for that, or else go find a prostitute.
The desire to be romantically involved does emanate from the mating instinct, which is sexual at its base. It's a lot more than that, though. As that instinct has evolved, it's an instinct to find a "mate for life", not just a "warm place to put it" . There is a natural emotional bonding that comes from making love, and most guys over 30, have come to understand how unfulfilling it is to have sex without feelings, and how extraordinary it is to make love, when the feelings are there.
Part of sexuality for a man are the thoughts and feelings that he has for his lover, when they aren't making love. In a good relationship, sexual desire is part of how each partner sees the other. In a good relationship, everything in the relationship, in one way or another, becomes "extended foreplay". It creates an intimate closeness, while doing the most ordinary things together.
I think the poster highlighted above just doesn't get it. It is in no way reflective of the general opinion of men. It's as "off", IMO, as those who dismiss the importance of sexuality in a good relationship. Neither attitude will ever result in a full, serious, committed relationship.
RenaissanceMan1950
Joined:
2/20/2009
Msg:
175 (
view
)
Must the goal be 24/7 in a committed relationship?
Posted:
8/16/2009 8:45:20 AM
I believe that is one of the real issues in your thread... people jumping their relationships towards living together prematurely, before they know each other really well.
Yes, that is part of the original point. There seem to be many who make the "judgment" that if you aren't quickly moving to living together, that it's not a "committed" relationship and is, therefore, "friends with benefits".
While I, personally, couldn't care less what other people think, that does seem to permeate the thinking of many women, so by the time you've been seeing someone for 6 months, there is often an "expectation" that you "should" be making plans to live together.
In my experience, if you move in together that soon, you invite in a whole bunch of "issues" that have nothing to do with the quality of the relationship, per se, but that are about adjusting to someone else in day to day life. Inevitably, that brings some friction, or resentment, or feelings of being "smothered" and an ever growing yearning for some personal space.
In the ideal, marriage somewhere down the road is a fine goal, it takes a lot longer than 6 months, or even a year, to have that degree of certainty.
It would seem that, in Canada, living together is almost the same thing, legally, as marrying. So, perhaps, it would be more difficult for Canadians to "get it", that living together, for many, in the United States is still a common practice, and for some indicates a "stage" or progression in the dating process that indicates "committment".
Show ALL Forums