online dating service
REGISTER | MAIL/PROFILE | HELP | NOW ONLINE | SEARCH | RATING | FORUMS | SUCCESS STORIES

 

     
Posted In Forum:
Home   login   MyForums  
Show ALL Forums  
 
 Author Thread: What is going to happen to/in America?
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 4 (view)
 
What is going to happen to/in America?
Posted: 9/22/2009 10:23:06 PM

Personally, I'm hoping for the rapture . . . then I can have all their stuff and we can move on.

I haven't had a good rapture since I hooked up with that gymnast who had a penchant for farm-fresh vegetables while swinging on the uneven parallel bars.

I'll never be able to look at an eggplant in the same way again......
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 48 (view)
 
Islam Goes to bat for America
Posted: 9/22/2009 10:16:47 PM

It doesn't seem as though you've addressed the "every other nation and society" statement, even though you assert that it is "catagorically true." Fairly sound examples, though. Good start.

That's why I gave examples - so I wouldn't *have* give an exhaustive list of each country, along with when it abolished slavery, to show how ideas changed over time.

Actually, there was justification in your "explanation. Let's at least be honest about that.

Not quite. I tried to explain the prevalent moral/philosophical ideas of the time, from which they would have derived their own justification. That's not the same as justifying it myself.

"...the historical fact of why..." Now if that isn't a red flag of oversimplification then I'll be a monkey's uncle!

Of course it's a simplification - do you want to try to explain a few hundred years of history in an internet forum? I stand by my statement, and believe it to be correct. If you want to argue about whether or not it's an oversimplification, well that's an entirely different arguement.

You're trying to hide the ball here. Careful what you call intellectually dishonest. Keep in mind that you don't have to defend the US against implications of being some evil empire. It gets you off track and it's really not the point.

Where did you get that idea that I *was* defending the US? All I was trying to do was show that it was no better - or worse - than any other country in the world.


That is your response to a poster calling fundamentalists ignorant of world events. Do you always support gross generalizations so vigorously?

No. I misread - I was thinking zealots, not fundamentalists.
@ismene2:

What you have illustrated is that you have a biased, one sided, limited and self serving vision of history and apparently no relevant understanding or awareness of the broader world as far as current events and circumstances.

ummm ..... you might want to re-evaluate that last statement. I was agreeing with you.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 41 (view)
 
Islam Goes to bat for America
Posted: 9/22/2009 6:44:50 PM

even if this were true (which it isn't)

Which it catagorically is. The first developed/European country to make slavery illegal was Portugal, in 1761, for mainland Portugal and India - their other colonies were unaffected. Britain followed in 1772; the first US state to abolish slavery was Vermont, in 1777.

The major reasons for wars in sub-Saharan Africa - even during the height of Shaka Zulu's empire - was to raid for slaves and cattle, not to control territory. And *every* African slave that wound in in America was either sold willingly by the family, or captured during a raid and sold from one to another in order to get to the docks so they *could* be put on ships in the first place. Slaves that wound up in Europe or North America wound up there because they were sold out by their own long before they ever saw a white man.



sounds a lot like what my five year old nieces and nephews say when caught doing something bad.

"well, johnny did it too."

barbarity on the part of someone else is not an excuse for it on your part.


First - what your nieces and nephews are doing is trying to excuse and justify their actions. I am explaining, not an excusing.

Second - the fact that it offends your sensibilities doesn't change the historical fact of WHY it happened.

Third - when the European population at large didn't even consider black Africans to be even human, you shouldn't be surprised when they don't treat them as human. If you went back in time and told a slave owner what YOU believe, they would give you the same funny look that people give PETA activists when they say the equivalent of "well, animals are people too, yanno".

Fourth - Context is everything when you're dealing with history. You took an event from history, totally ignoring the context. Every other society IN THE WORLD - with very, very few, localised exceptions - also kept slaves at that time. You pulled one sad chapter from history, ignored the fact that *nobody* did anything different at the time, and used it to attempt to make the USA look like some evil empire, totally ignoring the fact that everybody else was doing the same thing, for no other reason than to try to make the US look somehow more evil than anybody else.

Fifth - morals, mores, and beliefs change over time, whether you like it or not. You may consider it to have been barbaric - that's absolutely your choice. And fortunately for us all, there are only a very few people in the world today who would disagree with you. But it doesn't change the fact that they didn't see anything wrong with what they were doing, or that the rest of the world believed, and acted, the same.

Just please, try not to be quite so selective in your criticisms - it's intellectually dishonest, and doesn't help your case.

@ismene2:

Oh yes, I forgot ignorant. Fundamentalists in every religion tend to be extremely ignornant about history and current world events and situations.

A-freaking-men.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 29 (view)
 
Islam Goes to bat for America
Posted: 9/22/2009 3:18:33 AM

any nation that enslaved an imported population for 250 years and then repressed them brutally following that

Which is basically the same thing that every other nation and society did at the time, because ideas about human rights (and even who/what was human) was not as advanced or sophisticated as what it is today.
Remember - before that "enslaved imported population" got to North America, they were probably sold 10/15 times by people on their own continent before the even set foot on a ship. And even then there would have been competition from every other western country for the best specimens .... so it's hardly a failing peculiar to the USA.

has 4% of the worlds population and 25% of the worlds wealth

May those damned Yankees roast in hell for having the most efficient, productive workforce in history, along with the education, resources, and drive to innovate, invent, and develop. How *dare* they!

has 10 million children who lack hot food every day

I think there's some toilet paper stuck to your number - probably due to where you got it from. This of course ignores the fact that even the poorest child in almost any of the western industrialized countries is orders of magnitude better off than the vast majority of the worlds' population.

has the largest prison population per capita in the civilized world

That may make them anal retentive, but it hardly makes them barbarians.

has killed at least 100,000 civilians by bombing in the last ten years doesn't have a lot of room to be calling other civilizations barbarous.

Another number with toilet paper stuck to it. Here's a little exercise for you:
a) take your pick of any middle-eastern or African countries you choose, so that their population adds up to equal that of the USA.
b) total up the number of people killed by their own governments.
Which number is higher?

God knows that the USA isn't perfect - no country is. And God knows there is more than enough things about the US to criticize. But if you're going to do it, why don't you try using some real, meaningful statistics, instead of using hand-wavy, broad-brush insinuations that do nothing more than show intellectual dishonesty and laziness?
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 22 (view)
 
Do you think today's western culture influences women to be ego inflated?
Posted: 9/17/2009 12:09:35 AM

Really? Or do a lot of men on here **** because the chick they have a hard on for does not write him back, and we all know that means she is a stuck up **** who is looking for Mr Perfect, and only goes for bad boys, and is probably a dike, and is just looking for a free meal and, and, and, ....

I have no doubt whatsoever that happens - being delusional isn't restricted to women - not by a long shot.

That being said, a lot of what was in that article rang true though I'd hardly call it an endemic. And the last time I met somebody from here - just for coffee - it felt so much like a job interview that I was starting to wonder if I should have worn a suit and brought my resume. Maybe I should have filled out an application form in triplicate and paid a filing fee or something?

As for the "strong, independent woman" bits that other mentioned: there is a very big difference between being strong, capable, having a mind of your own and standing up for your beliefs, and being a **** - just as there is a difference between a man being strong, capable, having a mind of his own and standing for HIS beliefs, and being a domineering, abusive arsehole.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 49 (view)
 
Who owns the world and has power to control us all?
Posted: 9/16/2009 11:05:04 PM
I started reading this thread out of a sense of curiosity, which grew to amusement, then surprise, and then incredulity. Then I went and had a cup of coffee, came back, and re-read it to make sure I hadn't been hallucinating.

A partial list of all the groups that have been fingered/blamed in this thread (from memory only, because I am NOT going to subject my brain to this crap for a 3rd time): christians, non-christians, muslims, the illuminati, Masons, Bilderburg, merchant bankers, n0n-merchant bankers, big government, little government letting individuals/corporations have their way, politicians, the military-industrial complex, the UN, the World Bank, the IMF, and god knows how many others - my eyes started to glaze over.

Each of the accusations for each of the guilty parties was supported with "irrefutable proof" of their guilt, provided you were not a sheeple, were not blinded by the mainstream press, the left, the right, special interest groups, corporate advertising, greed, christian ideals, non-christian ideals, or your grandmother's cookie recipe. (OK, I made the last one up - but I could construst just as believable case for that, as anybody else has done for anything else).

So, a couple of comments:

- if there is irrefutable proof for each of these guilty parties, and we assume that only ONE group can own the world and has the power to control us all ..... then only one of you can possibly be correct.

- EVERY SINGLE ONE of the "proofs" advanced here are nothing more than "6 degrees of Kevin Bacon" type constructs that can connect anything to anything, anywhere, any time.

Do you REALLY want to control the world? I'll tell you how - and it's dead simple - so much so that even anybody in this thread can do it.

- Gain control of an aluminum smelter.
- Start a company that specializes in making tin foil hats. (which has never been made of tin, but always of aluminum - wonder what group is behind THAT plot, hmmm?)
- Sell said tin foil hats on bulletin boards and chat rooms just like this.

I guarantee, that within 10 years you'll own the world from all the money you've made.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 33 (view)
 
Question's of choice.
Posted: 9/13/2009 7:01:24 PM

Students in public schools are fed huge doses of anti-American and humanistic propoganda. Joseph Stalin would be proud to see the progress of the American public school system in turning our youth in to radical communists.


Apparently, you have no idea what Stalin, Stalinist Russia, or Communism is like - and especially not the school system.

I'm starting to wonder why I bother to read some of these forums .... the jingoism is over the top, and the ignorance of most people about even the basic definitions of socialism and communism is astounding - don't get me started on the incredibly delusional ideas about history.

If some of you lot were as quick to learn as you were to speak, we'd all be a lot better off.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 7 (view)
 
Social Sites
Posted: 9/13/2009 12:39:54 PM
@WhataSmart1:

Those sites are doing nothing illegal - they're just taking advantage of people's stupidity.

When you give somebody your ID and password for msn, yahoo, or whatever, if you look you will see in the fine print that you are also giving them authorization to contact people in your contact lists.

They then spam everybody on your lists with the email, messages in chat, etc. The only way to stop them is to change your password.

Oh, yeah - you can also be pretty sure that the ID/email addresses they glean from the contact lists are subsequently sold to every spammer in the country, too - so when the volume of spam you receive after your friends "invite" goes through the roof, you can thank your friend's stupidity.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 17 (view)
 
Made in China
Posted: 9/13/2009 12:26:38 PM

Hmm - why are the carmakers having such problems now ? Japanese competition?

Because the Big 3 decided to focus on the SUV/high end car market, where the profit margins are larger, and conceded everything else to the Japanese, because they couldn't compete on price OR quality.

Price of gas goes through the roof, nobody wants their big guzzlers any more, and poof - the American manufactures are screwed.

but if the Japanese experience is anything to go by, there could be major economic problems down the line.

People's ****ing about the Japanese trade deficit is just that - noise and ****ing.

Did you know that Canada and the US to more trade EVERY DAY, than the US does with Japan in an entire year?
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 3 (view)
 
Left-handed people
Posted: 9/13/2009 1:20:46 AM
I'm left handed, and so is my daughter. Nothing pleases me more than to see her friends come over, and ask to borrow either mine or the rodent's computer - and then see the look of total confusion on their faces when they try to deal with a mouse to the left of the keyboard, with the buttons reversed :-)

Yes - we're definitely different.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 26 (view)
 
Are The Youth of Today Narcissistic?
Posted: 9/13/2009 1:18:43 AM
When I was growing up, my sisters would come home from school, and immediatly get on the phone and spend the evening talking to the girls they'd just finished spending all day with.

When my daughter comes home, she sits in front of her computer with msn, google talk, yahoo, facebook, and livejournal - and spends the evening chatting with her friends.

What's the difference?
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 7 (view)
 
Made in China
Posted: 9/13/2009 1:15:17 AM
China is going through what Japan did in the '50s, '60s and '70s - massive industrialization of what was essentially an agrarian economy.

Just as Japanese goods were crap then, Chinese goods now have quality control issues. But the American economy didn't implode then, and it won't implode because of the Chinese now.

As far as your mp3 player is concerned - when you pay $9.95 (or whatever it was) for one, wtf do you expect?
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 49 (view)
 
As you've gotten older, are you more sensitive regarding suffering in the world?
Posted: 9/12/2009 3:29:06 AM
@SmilingSalmon:


I believe the world has always been a hard, cruel, killing, evil place, except for brief periods of specific history. I think that during the Victorian era and the proceeding 50-75 years, individuals in the western world were trained and cultured to present more civil, humane and formal virtues, so most people were less cruel and more gentle and genteel; while armies went out to conquer and cruelty stayed mostly on the battlefield and women stayed at home learning to be proper and obedient.

Well, what was the Victorian Era really like?
- slavery
- workhouse/poorhouse, where you went if you could not pay your debts
- the start of the industrial revolution, with 14/16/18 hour work days for children as young as 6.
- the "rule of thumb", which in English common law, meant that it was legal for a man to beat his wife as long as he doesn't use a stick thicker than his thumb.
- European attitudes about non-European peoples that made Hitler and his ideas about race look positively enlightened. Let's not get into attitudes about non-christians.

Back to the topic at hand:

I don't think the world has become more cruel - we're just more aware of it.

Even 20 or 30 years ago, you didn't hear about something bad or cruel unless it was truly spectacular, or it happened in your local area. Now with 24 news networks and the internet, I can sit here in Canada and hear about a rape in Botswana.

I do agree with you, however, that as we grow older and see more and more - and yes, become aware of our own mortality as well - we do become more sensitive. It's much easier to be able to identify with others, when we have children of our own to worry and think about.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 80 (view)
 
What books would you recommend to me?
Posted: 9/12/2009 1:10:15 AM
If you want sci fi, go way old school - The Lensman series, by E. E. "Doc" Smith. (this is what Buck Rogers was based on).

Classic SciFi - try the Ringworld series, by Niven and Pournelle, or The Foundation series by Asmov.

Fantasy - I agree with the posters about the Pern books. You might also think about The Sword of Truth series by Terry Goodkind, or the Wheel of Time Series by Robert Jordon. The 13th (and final) book is due out this fall, written by his daughter - a good writer in her own right - based on copious notes and instructions Jordon put together for her before his death.

Fiction with a purpose - I recommend the Big Three - Animal Farm, 1984 and The Lord of The Flies.

Historical Fiction - how about something like The Robe? Like most books, much better than the movie.

Most of my reading nowdays has been history, so I can't give you much in the way of pointers for anything published in this century :-)
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 306 (view)
 
How did you come up with your screen name?
Posted: 9/11/2009 2:02:51 PM

I think you win for coolness story.

Alli oop .... I have been accused of many, many things during the course of my life - I've been guilty of some, not so guilty of others. But this is the first time I've ever been accused of being cool :-)
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 302 (view)
 
How did you come up with your screen name?
Posted: 9/10/2009 3:18:59 PM
Back in the good old days of the cold war, I was in an intelligence trade in the navy, where I learned to speak Russian. I got out after a few years to go to university, where I got an honours degree in Soviet & East European Studies.

Admiral Sergei Gorshkov was the architect of the Soviet Navy. So, Gorshkov I became, and Gorshkov I've been, everywhere on the internet, since about 1984 or so.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 215 (view)
 
Are vegans and PETA more moral and ethical than society?
Posted: 9/8/2009 8:31:15 PM

In fact PETA is practically considered a terrorist organization because it stands in opposition to our society's position on animal rights.

As far as I'm concerned, PETA *is* a terrorist organisation - not "practically" about it.
But that is not because of their beliefs - it is because of their tactics and their behaviour.

As I said in another thread ..... I have no problem with you risking your life for your beliefs. I do, however, have a very BIG problem with you risking somebody else's life for your beliefs. And that is exactly what PETA does with a lot of their bullshit.

Personally, I find it much easier to admit to my immorality and lack of authenticity, than to lie to myself. I will never proclaim that decent, ethical people, fighting a just cause for animal rights, are "terrorists" out to destroy our way of life; I know better; do you?

We're omnivores. We're *designed* to eat meat. Morality has nothing to do with it.

As far as people in PETA being "decent, ethical people" is concerned .... what is so ethical - or moral - about endangering the lives of the animals they claim they're trying to save when they pull one of their release stunts? How do they gain moral superiority when they put people's lives at risk? Are you trying to claim moral superiority because they risk people's lives, instead of animal's lives?

I think your moral compass has been sitting a wee bit too close to a loadstone, because it seems to be spinning in circles, without pointing in any predictable direction.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 25 (view)
 
Central banking... Flawed system?
Posted: 9/8/2009 4:33:28 PM

I am unsure if you were insulting me or the other poster, but insults do nothing to further a discussion, regardless of the receiver.

If you want to take it as an insult, it's a free country - go right ahead. Personally, I was always under the impression that ":-)" at the end of a statement showed humour.

As per topic, I was wrong about history. I was not there, that does not change my stance on the idea of a Central Banking System.

OK - so now you DO have me curious. Your justification for your opinions on a central banking system were based on history .... but since the history was wrong, doesn't it follow that maybe you SHOULD revise your opinions somewhat?

Now might be a good time to point out that one of the reasons we haven't had a big crash since 1929 was BECAUSE of the central banking system, where the rules and regulations have been fine-tuned after each event to lessen the swings in the market.

The current crisis is because the POLITICIANS changed the regulations, at the behest of the MERCHANT bankers, not the central bank.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 23 (view)
 
Central banking... Flawed system?
Posted: 9/6/2009 11:43:18 PM

quite the history student huh? did you notice the Great Depression started with the crash of 1929. the Federal Reserve Bank was created in 1912 and FDR didn't even become president until 1933 . and the Fed was created because of the Panics of 1873, 1893, and 1907.

wudger - one thing you'll find in these forums is that a posters knowledge of history is inversely proportional to the frequency and lengths of their posts :-)
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 22 (view)
 
Central banking... Flawed system?
Posted: 9/6/2009 11:31:50 PM

The concepts that gave birth to the World Bank arose out of the neo liberal globalization movement in the 70s, and was pimped by western leaders like Reagan, Thatcher and Mulroney in the 80s, ...it's a failure. The idea was to shift power from nation states to economic market forces and mega corporations (no national loyalty, just a loyalty to greed). This methodology was akin to viewing societies through the prism of markets, as opposed to people.

Nice explanation, but absolutly incorrect. The World Bank, and the IMF, arose out of the Bretton Woods Conference in 1944. Kinda/sorta long before Reagan, Tatcher and Mulroney, and not related in anyway to ANY "globalisation" movement in the 1970s, or any other decade.

Many nation-states, presented with utter financial failure have opted out of the model, and in spite of the hew and cry of the globalization proponents, they have all seen their national economic catastrophes turn to recovery, and even thriving economies, by adopting a positive nationalist stance that was the norm prior to the 70s/80s.

Care to offer even a single example?
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 8 (view)
 
Forums can be annouying!
Posted: 8/25/2009 5:56:21 PM
Some people just don't like to admit that they don't know everything, or could possibly be wrong. Coming to the forums to learn something is like going to an abattoir in search of carrots.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 8 (view)
 
The hunters of Saskatchewan
Posted: 8/11/2009 4:01:00 PM

People who hurt animals are truly worthless garbage.

I grew up hunting. Those guys are not hunters.

When you see people in the woods with firearms, you see two types of people - hunters, and sportsmen.

A hunter is somebody who is looking for food.
A sportsman is somebody who, every now and then, has the urge to go out and kill something.
 NotGorshkovAgain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 2 (view)
 
The hunters of Saskatchewan
Posted: 8/11/2009 12:06:51 PM

$7,000 fine for the idiot firing his gun out a window of his truck.

As far as I'm concerned, he also should have lost the gun and the truck.
 NotGorshkovAgain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 37 (view)
 
This hasn't made the News, but it should.....
Posted: 8/9/2009 2:06:55 PM

She must be pretty stupid to think her intestine has a head, arms and legs.

Women aren't like us menfolk. They don't normally look down to admire their handywork before flushing.
 NotGorshkovAgain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 3 (view)
 
***police misconduct, POLICE MISCONDUCT, police misconduct***
Posted: 8/8/2009 4:56:08 AM
I suggest we panic and shoot the horde
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 10 (view)
 
Lorena Bobbitt`s sister charged with similar crime
Posted: 8/8/2009 4:52:02 AM
I wonder what the reaction would be from some of you ladies if the news story was about the man trying to cut off her breast? Would they find it quite so amusing then?
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 47 (view)
 
does lack of dating make you homicidal?
Posted: 8/7/2009 6:50:08 PM

No, but being married has been known to make a person suicidal.

50% of all marriages end in divorce. The remainder end in death.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 8 (view)
 
Will You Survive The Global (panic) Depression ?
Posted: 8/4/2009 7:03:50 PM
Given that a lot of countries are already starting to turn around, don't you think these doomsday questions are a bit out to lunch?

Why are there never enough tin foil hats to go around .......
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 32 (view)
 
Men and Unpleasant Subjects
Posted: 8/2/2009 1:07:12 AM
One thing that's guaranteed to make me shut down, stand up and walk out if to try to have a conversation with a woman who will not say what she's talking about, but who just hints around the edges and expects me to use chicken bones or the tarot to figure it out myself.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 15 (view)
 
Unfair Judge?
Posted: 7/29/2009 5:29:11 PM

Due to me not attending yesterday the judge felt that my appeal to vary the order was just tit-for-tat, he wouldn't allow CAFCASS to get involved. Nor would he force my ex to attend mediation to sort this out faster (which is the result I was hoping for).

People can say anything, and often do. But it is their actions that tell the truth about what they believe, and who they are. Anybody who's ever spend 10 minutes on a dating site knows that.

The judge chose to base his decision on your actions (not showing up), not your words. Personally, I'd have done the same thing.

Don't like it? Show up when you're supposed to. It really is that simple.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 74 (view)
 
Medical Terms you won't hear used in Canada
Posted: 7/28/2009 6:44:44 AM

And how many of those people actually need medical attention on the days when they don't have coverage? It isn't having a significant effect on overall life expectancy if they can go in the following day/week/month.

Would you want to be the one to risk it? We are, of course, ignoring the fact that when (if) they do get subsequent insurrance, they risk running into the dreaded "pre-existing condition" bits.

And I'd take you bet for all you've got. The census report where the 47 million number came from states that less than 16% of that 47 million had no healthcare coverage at all throughout the entire year surveyed.

Which makes about 6 million people for the entire period - how many others are close? Your one-day window is beginning to look more and more suspect.

No, in fact, you just made mine. People get access to them without the need for a Universal Heathcare system.

Because that particular part IS universal.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 72 (view)
 
Medical Terms you won't hear used in Canada
Posted: 7/27/2009 11:19:16 PM

I, for one, do not want some government 'official' deciding if my life or the life of my child is worth trying to save.

Yes .... it's much better to let a PRIVATE 'official' decide if your life or the life of your child is worth trying to save, while he worries about being fired if he says yes too often.

I never said you claimed that the gap was widening. The point in mentioning that the gap isn't widening is that if universal care was responsible for the gap at all, the gap SHOULD BE widening. It isn't, hence unniversal care isn't responsible for it.

Ummmm ... not quite. If the difference in the gap is because universal health care adds a PERCENTAGE, then what you say is true. But if it is responsible for adding a fixed amout (say, 3 years?) the gap will remain the same.


#1 - not all trips to a health care provider or facility will prolong a person's life. If I go to a doctor and they tell me there is nothing wrong with me will I live longer then if I hadn't gone?

Nope. But the trips you make where the doctor says "You have a spot on your lungs - let's do a biopsy just to be safe" WILL make a difference.
That is one of the biggest, most underestimated advantages of universal health care - there is more of an incentive for PREVENTATIVE medicine, so that things are dealt with *before* they become big, major, life-threatening problems.


#2 - Not all who have healthcare insurance make use of it. The longevity numbers are for the total population. You could, under your theory, raise the longevity rates by getting people who already have insurance to get better/more frequent medical care. Even if there was 100% coverage, you still wouldn't have 100% participation.

Not at all - because the same type of person who would not use the system there when they have access to it, would also not use the system here when they have access to it. it's not a variable - it's inviolate, and would not affect the numbers either way.

The problem is not the people who don't use the system. The problem is the people who *can't* use the system.


#3 - those who don't have healthcare coverage in the U.S. aren't a static group. The often touted "47 million" that don't have healthcare coverage in the U.S. is actually 47 million people that didn't have coverage at some point during the 2 years prior to the survey. Some may have only been without for a day.

if we assume that each of those was out of coverate for only one day, then we have 47 million man-days without healthcare.
That's still 128,000 people, every day, without health care.
if it's a week, 900,000
if it's a month, it's 3.6 million.
6 months, it's 21.6 million.
Now - how much would you like to bet that that average is probably a lot closer to 2 years, than it is to 1 day?


#4 - a large portion of the uninsured aren't U.S. citizens (45% of non-citizens in the U.S. have no insurance) and wouldn't be covered under any of the proposed health plans so their impact isn't going to be changed.

I'm pretty sure that when you hear about "XXXX AMERICANS do not have health insurance, that they're talking about American Citizens. Otherwise, they wouldn't be Americans, would they?


You can claim that it doesn't make sense but the stats don't lie.

Absolutly right. The people that use them, however, often do.


Heath insurance does little to impact longevity overall.

Almost, but not quite.


Advances in medical science drive those changes.

Wrong. ACCESS to advances in medical science drives those changes. In the US, that means health insurance.

It doesn't matter if you have found a cure for 99.999% of all cancers, if I can't get treatment.


The discovery of antibiotics and widespread use of immunizations did more to impact longevity in the industrialized world than anything else.

And thank god that they are UNIVERSALLY available, regardless of health coverage. Oh, wait - I think you just helped make my point.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 61 (view)
 
Medical Terms you won't hear used in Canada
Posted: 7/27/2009 5:36:00 AM
@killene:

Octomom might be the extreme,

you think?

but there are numerous premies born in the United States where the parent's tab is picked up by the the state/federal government just as Canada paid his daughter's.

And I will bet you there are just as many where the tab is NOT picked up.

@jimbo slice:

While the U.S hasn't surpassed these other countries, those countries haven't made gains on the U.S. either.

I didn't claim the gap was widening - I just said it existed, and that universal medical care is a big part of that difference

]The trend lines all remain on a parallel and implementing universal care in the U.S. isn't going to change that.

Objectively, that just doesn't make sense. Even if only 1% of the population gets medical care that would not get otherwise, and lives longer as a result, the average for the nation as a whole will increase.

Given that a) it is much more than 1%, and b) those who do not have coverage tend to be among the poorest and unhealthiest, there is no way you will ever convince me that it wouldn't make a difference.

@joanne1357:

if insurance did not cover it all , the child can be covered by Medicaid (in the US) as catastrophic care. The social worker assigned to you in the hospital should be working on it at time of birth. Granted there is about a 3 mo period before it kicks in , but you shouldnt be getting a bill once its pending- they can & do backbill

Correct me if I'm wrong - I may misunderstand how medicaid works. But what about the working poor? Those who have too high an income that they don't qualify, but do not have employment that gives sufficient medical coverage?

What about all the plans that have life-time caps? I'd have exhausted that just with my daughter's birth.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 54 (view)
 
Medical Terms you won't hear used in Canada
Posted: 7/26/2009 12:13:54 AM
Anybody see that beautiful young lady standing next to me, in my profile picture?

My daughter, now 19.
Born after 27 weeks. 2 lbs, 10 oz. Incubator for 4 months in NICU.

The only thing I had to worry about was getting to the hospital after work to visit - I'd probably still be bankrupt trying to pay for it all if I lived in the states.

Oh, yeah - anybody know why the life expectancy is higher in Canada than it is in the US?
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 20 (view)
 
Rude People......
Posted: 7/22/2009 11:55:08 PM
You should be thanking those rude posters, not complaining about them.

They make the rest of us look better :-)
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 26 (view)
 
Should wearing Lycra be against the law for middle aged people?
Posted: 7/22/2009 3:30:31 PM
Cher only looks good because she's got more plastic in her than the lycra does.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 19 (view)
 
Should wearing Lycra be against the law for middle aged people?
Posted: 7/21/2009 6:07:23 PM
Just because they make it in your size, doesn't mean you have to wear it.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 14 (view)
 
Who can you call?
Posted: 7/19/2009 10:41:50 PM
My father or my mother, depending on the situation. Kinda complicated, given that they're both dead - but I've never come across a situation that couldn't be solved by asking myself, "What would {mudder|fodder} do?
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 8 (view)
 
New global currency?
Posted: 7/19/2009 2:55:01 PM
From TFA:


[This disclosure signals the end of the dollar. Just to remind you, it has been alleged in this story, that there will be a "bankers' holiday" in September, where all withdrawals are frozen, to be followed by the introduction of a totally new global currency when they reopen.
Anyone who prefers to have cash in their pockets better take heed! Tomorrow will be very different from today. Better hurry with those last minute purchases of shotguns and canned goods.

Can we come back to you folks in September for an admission that your tin foil hats are sometimes worn just a wee bit too tightly?
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 52 (view)
 
Whale Wars, anyone else love it for the wrong reason?
Posted: 7/19/2009 1:51:49 AM

They at least credit from me for standing up and risking their lives for their beliefs. Something most people won't do .

I don't have a problem with somebody risking their own lives for their beliefs. I do, however, have a problem with people risking OTHER people's lives for their beliefs.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 43 (view)
 
How do you know that you know?
Posted: 7/17/2009 10:39:29 PM

All 7 Billion people on the planet know exactly what happens, the stone sinks.

Unless the stone happens to be flat and wide, and the body of water in question happens to be the dead sea. Then it floats.

Isn't physics wonderful?
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 2 (view)
 
terrible jobs/managers..how have you handled these to get happier at work?
Posted: 7/17/2009 7:37:29 PM
Manage your manager.
Observe them - pay attention to them. Try to get inside their head, and understand why they do what they do.

Once you're armed with understanding, you can deal with them. You still might not like them, or enjoy working with them, but your understanding will go along way to allowing you to do your job and keep your boss off your back. Hell - it might even help you get that raise, or get some other things done.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 12 (view)
 
How do you know that you know?
Posted: 7/15/2009 8:17:08 PM

How do you distinguish correct insight from incorrect insight? ( Philosophical quest).

Hindsight. Anything else is a crapshoot.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 12 (view)
 
early birth scare
Posted: 7/15/2009 8:09:44 PM

Thank you waz and alli... I had yet another scare... I am only a fingertip dialated... and not dialating anymore. Hopefully they have stopped until it is closer to my due date.

For what it's worth ... you see the 5'10, 140 lb gorgeous 19 year old young lady in the pic with me?
2 lbs, 10 oz when born after 27 weeks.

You'll be fine.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 13 (view)
 
Where's the Ask a Sapiosexual forum?
Posted: 7/15/2009 7:52:11 PM

Just occured to me; we've got 'Ask a Girl' and 'Ask a Guy', where's 'Ask a Gay'?

ummm .... in the closet?
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 21 (view)
 
Intelligence Assessments: How it works, and what can go wrong
Posted: 7/15/2009 4:49:25 PM

guess you will never admit you made a mistake when you said the yellowcake info was rushed up the chain of command in order to score brownie points even though the record clearly shows Cheney learned about it from his aide who had been told about it by Italian intelligence.

I talked about one aspect of it - you talked about another.

I guess it's too much to expect you acknowledge a fact. That's too "political" for you.

Ask an honest question, looking for an honest answer, and you'll get it. Rant, browbeat, and act like a troll and you'll be ignored.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 19 (view)
 
Intelligence Assessments: How it works, and what can go wrong
Posted: 7/15/2009 1:42:17 PM

It's interesting how you're willing to talk about the politics of this with others who agree with you, but when I point out your errors of fact, you claim I'm talking about the politics of it (though I'm not) and refuse to discuss the politics

This is the last explanation you get from me about anything.

JWG86 made a comment about the relative important of politics vs intelligence. You went on a political rant that would have made an 18th century pamphleteer proud.

I will address comments and honest questions. I will ignore trolls flamebaiting, and partisan propaganda, from all sides.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 43 (view)
 
Whale Wars, anyone else love it for the wrong reason?
Posted: 7/15/2009 12:37:55 AM
@nexthme:

I do know that there are places that can harvest Canadian Geese, and have shot them for shyts and giggles then dumped over 30 dead birds over an embankment.

When you go into the woods, you run into two types of people - hunters, and sportsmen.
A hunter is somebody who is looking for food.
A sportsman is somebody who every now and then has the urge to kill something.

Sportsmen should be shot on sight. If you don't need something to survive, then leave it the hell alone.
@CassaGo:

I am an avid supporter of eco-terrorism, frankly. I was happy when they burned down Vail properties a few years ago. It takes radicals to make "normal" people understand how bad it's gotten.

The only difference between an "eco-terrorist" and a sportsman (see above) is the species they target. They're both repugnant and just as equally morally bankrupt.


I disagree with your assessment about this show in particular not gaining support for anti-whaling. The popularity of the show sort of points out that is IS garnering support -- perhaps a lot of people never knew how icky whale butchering is; now they do, so can be outraged.

The show is popular for the same reason survivor, Growing up Gotti, Bitg Brother, the Osbornes are popular - people like to see other people acting like idiots and arseholes so they can feel superiour.
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 24 (view)
 
Chinese Building an Aircraft Carrier
Posted: 7/14/2009 1:01:04 AM

India is expecting to retire the VIRAAT in two years when they commission their refitted Kiev class carrier, which would be the ex-ADMIRAL GORSHKOV (I wonder which poster on this thread might get a kick out of that).

Not a clue ... but whoever he is, I bet he's been getting major boners for years, every time he thinks about it :-)
 notgorshkovagain
Joined: 4/29/2009
Msg: 16 (view)
 
Intelligence Assessments: How it works, and what can go wrong
Posted: 7/14/2009 12:54:58 AM

Iraq is an interesting situation and "Intelligence" played a lot smaller role than politics.
Absolutly. That is where the US felt the lack of HUMINT the most ... with any sort of reasonable assets on the ground, enough certainty may have been able to be established that the politics never would have been an issue.

I know some of the people who monitored our ground assets and those of the enemy. Countless times they saw our assets closing in on an objective in superior numbers and with the tactical high ground only for the attack/hit to be called off and for them to stand down.

You might be surprised at how often that happens in the field. Given the cloud of mismanagement and suspicion surrounding how the US wound up in Iraq in the first place, it is easy to assume that that was caused by political interference of some sort - but you have to remember that it is still an assumption.
 
Show ALL Forums