REGISTER
|
MAIL/PROFILE
|
HELP
|
NOW ONLINE
|
SEARCH
|
RATING
| FORUMS |
SUCCESS STORIES
Posted In Forum:
All Forums
Alabama
Alaska
Alberta
Arizona
Arkansas
Art/Music
Ask A Girl
Ask A Guy
Australia
British Columbia
Broken Hearts
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Dating & Love Advice
Dating Experiences
Dating Sites
Delaware
District Of Columbia
Event Hosts forum
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Health & Fitness
Humor
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Introductions
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Manitoba
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Brunswick
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
Newfoundland
News/Current Events
North Carolina
North Dakota
Nova Scotia
Off Topic
Ohio
Oklahoma
Ontario
Oregon
Over 30
Over 45
Pennsylvania
Plentyoffish Get Togethers
Plentyoffish Site/Suggestions/Help
Poems And Quotes
Politics
Prince Edward Island
Profile Reviews
Quebec
Recipes & Cooking
Relationships
Religion/Supernatural
Rhode Island
Saskatchewan
Science/Philosophy
Sex and Dating
Single Parents
South Carolina
South Dakota
Sports
Stories/creative writing
Technology and computers
Tennessee
Testimonials
Texas
Uk Forums
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Volunteer Moderators Only
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Home
login
MyForums
Show ALL Forums
Author
Thread: The Game and its effectiveness
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
283 (
view
)
The Game and its effectiveness
Posted:
11/15/2009 8:07:07 AM
Bottom line: You don't want to be "the boss", ie. the initiator, because you fear what walking up and initiating things can bring -- the word "no".
Firstly, I'd like to say that I enjoy most of your posts. But moving on - I don't mind initiating conversations, I simply detest having to carry them. I think there's as many women who can't hold a conversation as there are men who cannot start one.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
281 (
view
)
The Game and its effectiveness
Posted:
11/15/2009 12:41:53 AM
That's why women spend so much money and time making themselves look good, not to mention a lot of the beautifying is also painful, like high heels, skimpy clothes (freezing) and waxing (ouch) or dying your hair (chemicals stink and make you feel ill). It's a hell of a lot of work for most women - very few can just shit shower and shave and be ready to go and ALSO look the way men exepct them to.
Well, apparently most women find the high heels, skimpy clothes, waxing and hair dying easier than developing social skills or getting some character. And why shouldn't they? It is.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
280 (
view
)
The Game and its effectiveness
Posted:
11/15/2009 12:29:40 AM
Are you kidding.
Women spend hundreds of dollars on one evenings outfit and beaty routine only to bi ignored by all the guys she wants.
To my knowledge, men spend more money on 'gear' and 'kicks'. In high school and beyond I have never seen women held to the same standards of fashion as men. If a chick fills out her clothes nicely I don't think any guy is going to care which overpricing designer made them.
We suffer rejection all the time. It's just not in the same style as men do.
How so? To be rejected people have to first put themselves in a position to be rejected, which most women are not willing to do. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rejection
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
38 (
view
)
Does reading the forums make you more or less cynical about dating?
Posted:
11/8/2009 11:25:43 AM
Does reading these posts now affect the way that you approach new dates? Good or bad? In other words, do you think that it might be easier if you weren't exposed to the experience and attitudes of the other fishies.
I actually find a lot of the posters in these forums to be quite positive and supportive. Most of it is patronizing but not intentionally. Overall, I don't think viewing the forums has hindered my possibilities of connecting with someone. People either want to get to know you or they don't.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
1102 (
view
)
Why do hot girls never give a chance to an average looking guy?
Posted:
11/8/2009 11:12:50 AM
Forget about 'hot' girls. Most average looking girls don't even give average looking guys the time of day. 'Tis 'falling upward'.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
72 (
view
)
Gold-digger is just a term men invented to
Posted:
10/4/2009 10:16:20 AM
A lot of women feel that the men who complain about gold diggers are usually the ones who have nothing to dig. But one could also say that most of the women who do the gold digging aren't super models either. Perhaps both sexes are a little deluded?
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
36 (
view
)
Why Some Woman Remain Single...
Posted:
10/1/2009 6:53:25 PM
I remain single because of girls like you treating guys like losers and it comes back threefold on me and every other nice girl.
Though I don't have much sympathy for this Dimitri guy (who seems to be as narcissistic as a lot of women are) I do agree that many women generally view men as losers. I believe that the way in which men are viewed in popular culture helps to promote that view. In most of the commercials that you see on t.v. men are rejected, ridiculed, or physically harmed by women in a comedic light.
Type in the word 'misogyny' and no red dots appear under it, type in misandry (the hatred of men) and it's not even recognized as a word? Why? Because misandry is not acknowledged.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
236 (
view
)
The Game and its effectiveness
Posted:
9/28/2009 2:54:13 PM
This is pretty much crap.
I dont know a single woman who waits around without putting out any effort.
Sure some of us put out more effort than others but seriously...if you sit at home in your flannels waiting for Prince Charming to come banging on your door you are going to be waiting a hell of a long time.
I have to disagree with this. Go to any social gathering and you will see that this is not true. If women were actually putting as much effort into male-female interaction then there would probably be no such thing as a PUA culture.
I know a lot of people try to make it seem as if PUA culture revolves around addressing the average man's supposed inability to comprehend women, but I do not believe that that's really the issue. Women don't have this...unearthly, infallible comprehension of men, it's just that their approach (if you can call it that) is very favorable in terms of perception. For example, let's say I'm up on a stage in front of a large audience, and you're in the crowd staring up at me. You'll most likely have a better chance at sizing me up than I will you - you're sitting comfortably in a chair while I'm up there trying to maintain my composure, trying to say the right things, trying to suppress whatever awkward mannerisms I have, and ultimately, trying to convince you that I am worth listening to.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
227 (
view
)
The Game and its effectiveness
Posted:
9/27/2009 8:37:10 PM
But I will say this -- not all guys are embarrassed about their ability to get girls, even if there's some mild frustration at times.
Fair enough. I'm simply going off of my perception. I recently read a study on virgins and the results showed that black Americans are less likely than any other ethnicity to be virgins, and so I think it's fair to say that the reactions and the way that success with women is viewed tends to vary from people to people.
I'm certainly not embarrassed about my ability/inability to get girls but at the same time I'm not going to run up to a crowd of people and say "Hey, I've never had a girlfriend". As one of my friends pointed out: as soon as you let people know they want to bombard you with questions and suggestions, and stare at you like some circus freak. Because, after all, it is unusual.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
225 (
view
)
The Game and its effectiveness
Posted:
9/27/2009 7:05:15 PM
Women can mope and whine and complain all-day, every week of their life about how unfair their life is and they can still get a date or a boyfriend, but if men do the same thing, they would not even get an inch close of getting a woman.
If you already know this, then it would be wise to stop wasting your time here . You're right, the world is more receptive when it comes to the emotional or physical suffering of a woman. Not too long ago I was watching First 48 and one of the detectives was trying to solve a case that involved a murdered man and he said that it would be hard to get information because the world does not feel as compassionate towards a man as they do a woman. Ironically, that reminded me of Chris Rock's stand up where he talked about how a murdered woman gets more publicity than a murdered man. But such is life, for the time being anyway.
There are people who will listen to you. There's counselors, support groups, and anti-feminists (they'll probably be more willing to listen to you than anyone).
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
224 (
view
)
The Game and its effectiveness
Posted:
9/27/2009 6:39:18 PM
Perhaps they should regroup on this mindset. This is 2009, not 1959. Happiness comes from within - once you're maybe 26 at the latest, it's time to grow up and stop worrying what others think.
I can agree with that. People need to be happy with themselves because if you are truly happy with yourself then you don't need anyone to fill an emptiness. That's really the difference: there are people who want a companion and there are people who want a compensator.
Ego and place in society are outdated concepts.
Old, ancient, but not entirely irrelevant. Men have and always will want to be viewed as men, whether you're talking about the Spartan boys who entered the agoge, the Massai who have to kill lions to become men, or just plain old American guys who have to get a girlfriend and get laid.
I would say it's true for these type of guys:
- Can't pick up a girl to save their lives, but don't want to look like an idiot in front of their friends
- Low self-esteem and/or not liked well by others, so picking up girls is a way to get some pats on the back
- Popularity-craving guy -- low self esteem, much like previous, but that's just one way to boost his image for all to see
I'd say that the types of men that you just described make up a good deal of the population, and so I stand by what I said. Often, (I won't overstep my boundary and say more than often) it is about boosting self images and male validation, but I also believe that these types of men tend to belong to younger age groups, which I didn't state earlier. From a personal point of view, I've seen many men that I grew up with go from a braggart to a low key ladies man.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
220 (
view
)
The Game and its effectiveness
Posted:
9/27/2009 10:27:42 AM
Why? Because if you honestly hated women, you would live without them gladly. Therefore it's a dramatic statement meant to get people to stop and talk to you, which in this thread, seems to be working. If you hate the fact that you want a woman, be honest and say that. Based on your history, all that will happen if you continue to do what you do, is more of the same thing you claim not to like.
Not necessarily. For men, being popular/successful with women is often more about impressing other people than it is about impressing/satisfying themselves. That's pretty much what the forensic psychiatrist Michael Welner said about George Sodini. We live in a society where a man's masculinity is largely dependent on his relationship with women, and when some men can't get that validation they feel castrated and snap. That being said, there are men who don't really care for women at all but they want to be accepted by society.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
219 (
view
)
The Game and its effectiveness
Posted:
9/27/2009 10:02:58 AM
I'll probably be single for the rest of my life.
Drusurfer06, I am a man who has been as unsuccessful (if not more) with women as you have been, and there is a possibility that I may be single for the rest of my life also. But strangely, it doesn't seem all that unappealing as it used to because I am at peace with myself. Of course it would be nice to have someone to share my joys and sorrows with but if women fail to see what I have to offer, I am not going to let it keep me down.
Most people look down on introversion, however, I've found it to be a good way to get to know some key things about myself and it is a rational alternative to depression, suicide, drugs, etc. Some may associate it with narcissism but in actuality, it's just a way of converting loneliness into solitude, which can be productive if one makes proper use of it - take Nikola Tesla for example, the celibate genius to whom we owe credit for modern technology (Googling, cell phones, air planes, etc.).
I'm not trying to give you a 'man up' speech, because the men and women of this thread have amply supplied you with those, I'm just saying I believe that you're probably a good person with some good qualities and you don't need a woman to tell you that, it's just that society has told you that you do.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
1 (
view
)
Relationship status won't show up
Posted:
9/27/2009 8:39:37 AM
If you click on my profile, it says N/A where Single should appear. What's up?
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
188 (
view
)
The Game and its effectiveness
Posted:
9/24/2009 1:04:51 AM
Why is this a bad thing? If they're merely along for the ride, that means we get to do whatever we want and make all the decisions. That's hardly being women's slaves. If anything, wouldn't that make them ours? In fact, this very thing is what feminists complain about when they refer to men "oppressing" women.
By 'slaves' I believe he is referring to the average man's eagerness to learn and work at ways to become more compatible with the opposite sex - an eagerness that is rarely reciprocated. And by 'ride' I assume he means the transformations that men undergo. But I could be wrong.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
181 (
view
)
The Game and its effectiveness
Posted:
9/23/2009 3:27:23 PM
PUAs and other 'experts' emphasize confidence and self-esteem, which is a good thing, but what we should really be focused on are the things that made men so hopeless and spineless in the first place. I suppose PUAs can help to treat the symptoms but the disease is still alive and well.
That's just my take on it, I'm not complaining. Like Gandhi said, "You must be the change you wish to see in the world". And that's right. If I had a son I wouldn't want him to struggle with women the way that I have/do, or not fully appreciate his masculinity, and so it is up to me to do something.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
12 (
view
)
Shy, Disinterested, or Boring?
Posted:
9/19/2009 6:35:49 PM
Just cause a person is quiet, shy, sucks at conversation doesn't mean their a bad person and can't be a great person for you
Good point. But it seems that when it's a guy who's shy or quiet then he's automatically lumped into the not-so-great-person category, just read the threads. I suppose it's because of our traditional views about men and women.
Male or female, I don't think that shyness or quietness is an excuse for being an unenthusiastic conversationalist, especially when someone is opening up to you and being receptive to your thoughts.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
30 (
view
)
male hiding his virginity( women's opinions only)
Posted:
9/19/2009 5:24:45 PM
Do you think there are more virgin males in the world? or more virgin females?
I believe so, but it is very hard to gather solid data because many people (especially men) are very shy and ashamed about their virginity due to ridicule from peers and from mainstream culture (American Pie, The 40 Year Old Virgin, Super Bad, etc.). Women are more likely to be open with their virginity because it is not as big of an object of ridicule for females.
This particular study showed that male virgins outnumbered female virgins by five percent. http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2009/06/who-is-the-40-year-old-virgin.html
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
999 (
view
)
Why do stunning women go for geeks
Posted:
9/17/2009 8:50:28 AM
Where do you see this? Where I am stunning women only date pretty boys plain and simple
Where I'm from, they don't necessarily have to be pretty boys but they're certainly not geeks. Billy Joel even said "I really wish I was less of a thinking man and more of a fool not afraid of rejection".
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
997 (
view
)
Why do stunning women go for geeks
Posted:
9/17/2009 8:34:03 AM
Stunning women go for geeks? I guess it happens. Not to me though, and not to the point that it's putting PUAs (pick up artists) out of business.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
12 (
view
)
Can somebody please explain Maury guests? haha...
Posted:
9/17/2009 8:01:14 AM
It's all part of our culture. Americans have a very feminist, anti-male culture and our media reflects that.
ON PATERNITY
When it's a guy who denies being the father they boo him as soon as he comes out on stage, despite the fact that they haven't heard the results yet. And if it turns out that he is the father then the audience cheers and applauds the mother, as if a man has no right to be in doubt sometimes.
If it's a woman, and the paternity tests say that the man is not the father then she cries and Maury reverts to his fatherly role and tells her how he's going to do anything he can to help her find the real father. Even though she has brought a man on national television, accused him, and embarrassed him, she's still the victim.
When it comes to a guy who believes that he is the father, and he's told that he may not be the father, he usually gets misty eyed and asks the woman why she cheated. The woman usually turns on a stream of tears also to mitigate the devastating news she's just delivered. After that, Maury gives the guy a father-to-son type of speech. He encourages the man (who is now a bit confused as to what course of action he should take) to take care of a child/children that are not his, and tells him things like "I have kids that I'm not the biological father of, and I love them just like my own (totally leaving out the fact that he's wealthy, and can afford to take care of kids that aren't his!)". It doesn't really matter what the results are. If he is the father then they makeup and live 'happily ever after'. If the child isn't his they makeup and live 'happily ever after', then the Maury and the audience applaud him for being stupid.
I'm not going to type much more. I'll just say that when the shoe is on the other foot, it's the exact opposite. I saw an episode this morning in which a guy had cheated and Dr. Gardere (a frequent guest on the show) basically told the woman that if she got rid of the man she'd be doing much better.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
5 (
view
)
Pic with shirt off
Posted:
9/16/2009 12:16:00 PM
Yeah...e-dating is not the easiest environment to meet in, particularly for the younger age
group. I find the real world to be a better venue, but this is a good addition to other dating/meeting options...cause you never know.
I can't really say that I dislike one more than the other, as I've had zero luck with both.
Maybe change your headline on your profile. Might be meant as humour, but if it's the
first thing the gals read...not the best first impression, and you only get one chance to do that.
I actually just made the headline yesterday. I don't think I've missed out on a ton of spectacular girls on account of it. This cycle of failure just brings me back to the Einstein quote: insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. I'm just playfully experimenting, and my skepticism makes me comfortable enough to believe that I am not losing much by doing so.
G'luck
~mizz
Thanks again, and good luck to you as well.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
3 (
view
)
Pic with shirt off
Posted:
9/16/2009 11:17:48 AM
Their pics have just not been caught by the vetting process...yet.
New photos are looked at more often, so they tend to get reported & deleted faster.
Nothing personal...just the way it works right now.
Thank you for the clarification.
You're a handsome man. Keep your shirt on & the ladies will appreciate
your physique more when they get to unwrap the present themselves.
Thank you for the encouraging compliment, but the accumulation of dust on this unopened 'present' tells me otherwise.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
1 (
view
)
Pic with shirt off
Posted:
9/16/2009 9:20:30 AM
I know there are guys who have pics with shirts off, but every time I post one it's taken down in a flash. What gives?
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
1065 (
view
)
Why do women date mutiple guys at once?
Posted:
9/15/2009 8:59:52 AM
Anybody who keeps up with my posts knows that I am no feminist, but guys date multiple women just as much as women date multiple guys, if not more so.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
144 (
view
)
The Game and its effectiveness
Posted:
9/15/2009 8:42:04 AM
Silly boys...tricks are for kids.
Cheers.
I'll agree with that, but I believe that the tricks say more about the vast amount of women who fall for them. In all honesty, I think that a lot of guys would like to be able to approach a woman with something like "Hi, what's your name? My name is ________ and I'd like to get to know you better". But, as they pointed out in the movie Hitch, that just doesn't work. Despite their passionate requests that men be honest with them, women like to be tricked a little because it appeals to their need for instant gratification, as opposed to simply taking the time to get to know the real person. Neil Strauss is right about how approaching women with common sense doesn't work.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
140 (
view
)
The Game and its effectiveness
Posted:
9/14/2009 6:05:04 PM
If you ever went to a sales seminar, what is the fist thing that they tell you. First you have to fake it to them make it. YOu start by believing that whatever you are set to achieve, you can do it. Then they teach you a lot of technique. They don't tell you, oh, just be yourself when your prospect says this or that. No, they give you the perfect strategy so you turn the situation around. Then you drill, drill, drill, so when you go out on the field, it becomes second nature, it become part of the way you relate to people. You begin to ask questions, you begin to turn the situations that they are talking about into selling points, and in the end they sell themselves. This is the same thing.
I can see what you're trying to get at with the analogy, but I believe that your choice to buy the books or not buy them depends on your perspective. In my eyes, PUA culture is very feminist and one sided. When it came to royal marriages between a princess and a prince for instance, they would both be raised from early childhood on proper etiquette and similar tutelage took place in the lower classes I'm sure. With this PUA stuff it's just like...women are super advanced creatures that we now have to study in order to date, marry, and procreate with. How many women are reading dating books? Very few I'll bet, and that's because they don't need them. Neither do men.
PS A guy that I know keeps begging me to read Strauss's book so I'm going to give it a look. I'll get back to you on it.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
139 (
view
)
The Game and its effectiveness
Posted:
9/14/2009 5:28:48 PM
I think a better way to have said it might have been that this genre of products in general describes the work a guy must do in order to obtain equality with women in the dating realm. This is obviously only going to appeal to those guys who see themselves as being "one down" to women to begin with.
I agree. That is the main reason that those videos and books are not very appealing to me: they seem to imply a social and sexual inferiority inherent in men.
From the standpoint of most women, it's sorta like the proverbial bologna factory: they may want and like the end product, but they tend not to want to see how it's made.
Similarly, most men don't want to see women before the makeup, eyeliner, and sweet perfume.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
35 (
view
)
Would you date a guy who never had a girlfriend before?
Posted:
9/14/2009 1:16:13 PM
I could see how it would seem kind of weird to meet someone over 25 that has never been in a relatioship. I can relate to this and don't know what to do either.
I can relate also. People assume that if you've never been in a relationship that there must be something terribly wrong with you. Shy/lonely guys, in modern times, have been stereotyped as the 'creep', and men like George Sodini are used to generalize all men who don't have any women in their lives. A lot of people (especially women) commented that Sodini didn't have any women in his life because he was a psycho creep, and that women sensed that with their super duper perception. But one could also use men like Ryan Jenkins who had it all - looks, beautiful women, money - and still ended up being a murderer. Why didn't any of the beautiful women he was with sense that?
People fail to realize that when you're a guy it is fairly easy to go through life without having been in a relationship when men are socially expected to do all of the legwork in terms of initiating relationships. Despite the pressures and ridicule (The 40 Year Old Virgin, Napoleon Dynamite, Super Bad, American Pie, etc.) hurled at men, I find it more odd for a woman to have never been in a relationship to be quite honest.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
4 (
view
)
is there anything such as a woman being too shy/plus self hate
Posted:
9/13/2009 9:27:01 PM
another thing in my opinion all women are beautiful why are so many women i come across calling them self ugly some of them i see seem to be extremely beautiful. and why would they be looking to date if they think bad of there self
I think that if a good looking woman calls herself ugly then she's simply trying to get a guy to say that she's beautiful. La Rochefoucauld said that a refusal of praise is a desire to be praised twice. So true.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
130 (
view
)
The Game and its effectiveness
Posted:
9/13/2009 8:07:25 PM
They can absolutely be divided up this way.
Maybe into three catagories actually.
Three categories is more understandable I guess, but how, prithee tell would you divide up women?
Wussies- who most women want nothing to do with because they are pushovers with no independent personality.(can benefit greatly from Game tactics! and become "good guys")
I don't conform to the whims of women, so...the whole 'wussy' label cannot be branded on me (FYI, women do like pushovers, they just have to be rich ones - what do you think Hugh Hefner is?!). The only thing I could possibly get from these books is what David D'angelo calls 'cocky funny', which is being arrogantly playful, as the term implies. But the whole jester routine is not my style, or at least not on a regular anyway.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
124 (
view
)
The Game and its effectiveness
Posted:
9/13/2009 7:11:40 PM
If you read the paragraph over, you'll see that I was referring to the book called 'The Mack Within', and that was my personal opinion. But I can see how you might have gotten confused, so I'm not going to be a****about it. I should have added further clarification. As for the Neil Strauss book, I already admitted that I didn't read it.
It's not about men catering to women and kissing butt. It's about men being men
You'll have to elaborate on that. PUA's, along with women, seem to believe they know what a man is supposed to be. For example, David D'angelo talks about how most men are unsuccessful with women because they're wussies. And I personally do not believe that men can simply be divided into wussies and men.
PS If the PUA books are working for you then that's good, I'm not knocking you. I'm just saying that they're not for me. When I log into my POF I see ads (I'm sure you've seen them too) saying stuff like "The number one mistake that 8 out of 10 men make when dating online" and other such drivel. But you know, there's a saying that goes something like "The people who never make mistakes are the ones who aren't doing anything", and I believe that saying can be applied to the dating scene. So, naturally, men are the ones who make mistakes. No dating books are going to change that.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
122 (
view
)
The Game and its effectiveness
Posted:
9/13/2009 1:18:15 PM
I'd have to say that the 'game' is effective to a certain degree, but it's just that: a game. I've never read any books by Strauss or David D'angelo but my brother kept shoving Tariq Nasheed's 'Mack Within' down my throat, and so I finally gave in and read it. Although I haven't read Strauss's book, I assume the outline is similar. He makes some good points but in my opinion, his book, like the books of other PUAs, revolves around guys catering to women.
On Jimmy Kimmel, Neil Strauss even said that some guys get so obsessed with 'The Game' that they drop out of college to perfect it (I'm glad that Neil added that he didn't recommend that, especially considering how impressionable many men are). I think that says a lot about the frightening extent to which men are willing to go in order to strengthen their relationships with women, but women on the other hand make little to no effort understand and interact comfortably with men. And that's why I don't like PUAs. I wouldn't mind so much reading a book on how to fly a plane, because a plane is inanimate and cannot get to know you. People on the other hand can get to know you without the help of books if they make an equal effort and cease to behave as if they were inanimate.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
100 (
view
)
How long have you been single??? Whats the longest?
Posted:
9/11/2009 12:33:56 PM
I've been single my entire life actually. But there are worse things, worse things that I've seen with my own two eyes.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
65 (
view
)
Is being added as a favorite an invitation to e-mail?
Posted:
9/11/2009 10:03:40 AM
I got added as a favorite once. I naturally assumed it was an invitation, and so I sent a message but I didn't get any reply. Speaking as a man to another man, sometimes it is a lot like guerrilla tactics with women: you try to respond to contact in a logical manner but find that it doesn't work because guerrilla tactics have no orthodox pattern. Never is it contact, contact, it's contact, evasion, contact, contact, evasion, evasion, contact - you never figure it out.
A lot of women associate responsiveness with 'easiness', and therefore feel that they have to be responsive in small doses. One time a girl even admitted to me that sometimes she doesn't answer her phone because she doesn't want to seem (emphasis on the word SEEM) desperate. But I personally don't believe that refraining from playing games makes a woman 'easy', or desperate. I find these social maneuvers very strange, and what is more strange is the fact that people who refuse to play the games are considered socially awkward.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
62 (
view
)
How many George Sodini's are out there?
Posted:
8/18/2009 8:22:19 PM
I don't believe that MissMewsic is throwing a pity party. She's simply not adhering to the general "He was psycho, end of story" theory. The answer isn't as superficial as that, but it's much easier than thoroughly analyzing the issue and it makes society feel better about itself, and in many ways I can't reproach it for its inherent behavior/responses. For example, if the classic movie monster Jason was coming after me I wouldn't be worried about the fact that he was teased, bullied, and drowned under the neglectful supervision of camp counselors. I'd be trying to kill him before he killed me or get away! Similarly, when society is dealing with a monster its first priority is not to analyze it, but to get rid of it as quickly as possible.
Every man (aside from transsexuals and feminized gays) wants to be viewed as a man. But in this day and age a man's masculinity is null and void without the accompaniment of female interaction. Women on the other hand can neglect male attention/company - which many of them do - and it will be perfectly fine. If Katey Perry's HIT SONG about girls kissing each other isn't a sign of the times I don't know what is.
In short, it was George Sodini's gullability that led him to do those things. He really believed that he wasn't a man without women, and I've allowed people to make me feel that way before too, but never again. Never.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
2570 (
view
)
Internet dating: sucks for guys, good for women.
Posted:
8/1/2009 2:21:53 PM
Absolutely. I agree. I just joined this site, because it's different from all the other sites. But the same concept still applies. I once interviewed a lady who runs one of these dating services, and she let me know that these dating services normally have twice as many men in them than they have women. It gets even worse in the sites that hire pretty models to advertise for their sites, in some cases pretending like they're members of the site. Sites hire these models because that's the easiest way to increase membership, and you know these types of sites are bound to get oodles and oodles of more men joining, I guess they think they'll get those models. It gets very frustrating being a man. I think dating in general sucks for men, it doesn't for women.
Let's face it, this is the way nature is designed for whatever reason, the way the world is, not just for humans, but also for animals, males have to make the advances, women don't. I really think that us men have an uphill struggle, we need them a lot more than they need us. Life's not fair.
Well said, well said AbdulM. Samuel Johnson said that nature has given women so much power that the law has very wisely given them little (this was in his time of course). But now that they're pretty much on equal footing with men, the scales have been undeniably tipped in their favor in terms of male-female interaction.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
120 (
view
)
What do men really want?
Posted:
8/1/2009 1:51:56 PM
besides the obvious? Girls? Guys? When I say men I mean, good men real men! Not players?? I mean really, I get tons of questions . . . with the way you look, men are probably falling all over you. . . yeah so what they are after sex . . . almost all men are. . . then when you finally think you have found someone, that you are completely attracted emotionally, intellectually, and physically. . . it doesn't work out. . . . why I am been waiting on "the right one" since I was 15. . . . where is he?? I'm tired of heartache!
It's not that all men are after sex, it's just that those are the types of men that most women attract because of the way that they advertise themselves and sex is often the only thing that women offer. It's really a two way street.
Generally speaking, the ball is in the woman's court. Rarely is the man in a position to do the rejecting and accepting (unless he's rich or a model). That being said, women get what they want, or rather, they get what they think they want.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
471 (
view
)
Why do women who show cleavage get upset when a guy stares at their breasts?
Posted:
7/17/2009 8:30:27 AM
"It upsets a woman to be or not to be stared at hungrily" -Mignon McLaughlin
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
16 (
view
)
A woman's vision
Posted:
7/7/2009 1:03:26 PM
You mean there are actually women out there who make bad decisions about men? The mind boggles. I'm sure more research is necessary to definitively confirm that finding.
Actually, the studies pertaining to the 'nice guys finish last' theory WERE conducted mainly for confirmation. A lot of people deny the 'nice guys finish last' theory and it does seem to be more of a personal opinion than anything, but there's some fact behind it.
And please do not tell me you cannot figure out plenty of things about a person based on their appearance, haircut or otherwise. Consider the mullet, for instance.
What does the mullet tell you? The mullet tells you what the person does for fun? What the person reads? What the person is most passionate about? I'm dying to hear.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
15 (
view
)
A woman's vision
Posted:
7/7/2009 12:56:41 PM
It's not always about the woman making a bad choice.
I never said it was. I'm just saying, women are not imbued with this presupposed sixth sense that the OP speaks of. But I can see how I might have came off that way.
As far as the deadbeat fathers...and single moms. Again many reasons for a woman to get pregnant. The woman has the option of saying NO to a guy...and the option to use birth control or have an abortion. Unless it's rape no one forced her into such a circumstance. But many women use children to hold onto men who don't wish to be held.
No argument there. In fact, the ball is almost always in the woman's court, so to speak.
Some people are easy to figure out...They can be seen as no good. But others are very good at being bad and manipulative....they easily convince others about how great they supposedly are. Both men and women can be fooled at any given point in their lives.
I still disagree. It's true that you can gather certain ideas about people but that doesn't necessarily mean you've figured them out. For example, you might see a guy who has spiked blue hair and assume he's a brute, but for all you know he might be well versed in the works of Martialis and Juvenal.
The problem is that people are lazy. They don't want to get to know people. They want everything laid out for them right there...much like the way young children prefer picture books to books without pictures. It's really quite childish.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
45 (
view
)
How to impress a girl.
Posted:
7/7/2009 12:19:59 PM
I've realized that impressing women is fairly simple; it's acquiring the means with which to impress them that's difficult. Anybody remember that Reebok commercial that went something like "A jump shot can get you a shoe deal, a big house, a supermodel, fancy cars, a bunch of 'yes men', a Swiss bank account, but none of these things can get you a jump shot."?
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
11 (
view
)
A woman's vision
Posted:
7/7/2009 11:43:14 AM
Actually, women aren't as perceptive as they make themselves out to be. Look at the divorce rate, and the growing number of single mothers. A study done at the University of New Mexico revealed that 'bad boys' are more likely to get the girl, and they're more likely have a larger number of partners than other guys but they also have shorter relationships and they also tend to leave the child to be raised by the mother. Doesn't seem perceptive to me.
I don't think anybody can figure out a person just by looking at them, although many people think they can. And that's why a lot of people miss out.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
16 (
view
)
double standards
Posted:
7/7/2009 10:57:27 AM
P.S. OP - men can have sex as easily as women, they're just pickier about it. Most men can sleep with certain women but don't want to, and they can always pay for it but for some reason usually seem insulted by the suggestion.
I have to disagree with that. If anything, women are pickier than men (this usually holds for the ones that are overweight too) and that's because they can afford to be. Case in point: a fellow recently made a thread about how 95% of the people who ask for profile reviews are men (I guess POF felt the thread was too negative and deleted it). The desperation of men is what permits women to be picky.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
14 (
view
)
double standards
Posted:
7/7/2009 10:49:56 AM
I have to argue with you there ... I haven't lost mine yet; not because of like religious reasons or anything, just the situations and timings were never right. And both my male and female friends call me fridget, strange and are constantly at me to go get laid.
It is viewed as saintly, usually by elders/parents though. Either that or it's assumed that she's a virgin by choice....it's definitely not as embarrassing or as socially awkward as it is for a guy. Also, I think female virgins are more desirable too because it's seen as purity - a girl that hasn't been 'deflowered', whereas the guy is just seen as a dud. Ever hear of that girl Natalie Dylan who sold her virginity for a couple million? There was also an Italian model who was selling hers for a million euros or something.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
6 (
view
)
double standards
Posted:
7/7/2009 7:56:21 AM
It's just a fact of life, not much we can do about it.
I have to disagree with that Hanneke. There is something that men can do about it (some men are working hard to), but it's not going to be easy. Bringing about any social/political change is no small task.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
5 (
view
)
double standards
Posted:
7/7/2009 7:53:50 AM
Promiscuity is a double edged sword. If you're a guy and you don't have a woman/women, you'll be looked down upon. If a guy hasn't lost his virginity at the socially expected time then he is considered strange, if a woman hasn't lost hers she's considered saintly.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
20 (
view
)
Should the guy initiate chat?
Posted:
7/7/2009 6:24:16 AM
I don't initiate. Since I've been on this site I've sent two casual messages, just saying things like "nice profile" and I didn't receive or expect to receive any responses because they were purely casual messages, not "I wanna date" type messages. All of the correspondence between myself and POF women has been initiated by them. I'd say I've gotten about eight messages (in all eight cases the correspondence seemed to cease rather abruptly) in all - not very many, but not too bad considering the fact that women rarely make the first move.
When I read the threads I always notice that women talk about how they're so utterly flooded with messages from undesirable guys, and so I figure: why send them? And I notice that guys are always talking about how women have it so much easier than them when it comes to dating. Both men and women are behind the problems which they complain about. If every man on POF stops messaging every girl they like, then women won't be flooded with so many options anymore. They'll have to take some initiative and go after the guys that they're interested in. Both problems solved.
PS: Being old-fashioned has nothing to do with why women don't initiate, it's just convenient. For example, you can go out to any dance club and you'll see girls with short skirts, visible thongs, etc. (which is anything but old-fashioned!) and they'd give the same contradicting excuse.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
671 (
view
)
Why do Babes dig ugly guys?
Posted:
7/6/2009 1:31:36 PM
Some women are sadistic....I think that some of them just get with ugly guys to drive normal/good looking guys crazy. LOL. On a more serious note though, I don't think that women wake up in the morning and say "I think I'll go find me an ugly guy", it just seems like a lot of ugly/fat guys have qualities and abilities that transcend looks, and they hone those abilities because they know that they don't have looks to rely on.
This may sound sexist (I don't care) but women need something that they can benefit from. I observed this in elementary school, Jr. high, and high school. In general, a guy's looks are rarely as relevant as a woman's because of the different standards of attractiveness applied to each sex. And so, unless a guy meets those standards his looks will not gain him popularity.
A good sense of humor, a unique personality, or a tough guy attitude seem to be the most common ways to get attention from women. A guy with a good sense of humor can make them laugh, a guy with a unique and intriguing personality can make them wonder, and a tough guy can give them the excitement that they seek and a sense of taming the beast, so to speak. Those are all types of guys that they benefit from in some way. Women want to be entertained and looks don't do that.
LDF85
Joined:
6/20/2009
Msg:
44 (
view
)
If someone said to you...Did you lose weight?
Posted:
7/2/2009 1:09:47 PM
Unneedlessly? I don't think that's a word dear. As for the weight comment...I'd probably take it as a compliment, but then again, I'm a guy. We're not so touchy about our weight (nor our age). I remember back in high school when I first began to work out - people would always say "Man, you're getting bigger, have you been working out?", because I had been so scrawny before. I always felt proud about it.
Show ALL Forums