Show ALL Forums
Posted In Forum:

Home   login   MyForums  
 
 Author Thread: Should the President render salutes to military personnel ?
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 67 (view)
 
Should the President render salutes to military personnel ?
Posted: 11/8/2009 9:06:19 AM

What are you going to do if the president salutes the military?
Bring charges against him?

Grab hold of reality.

This is such a non-issue.
He salutes, he doesn't salute.
Either way, this particular president is going to catch hell from someone.


Precisely!
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 60 (view)
 
Should the President render salutes to military personnel ?
Posted: 11/6/2009 8:58:43 PM

Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower, and John Kennedy were all officers in the military in WWI and WWII , but once they took off the uniform they never returned military salutes as president.


Bullschit. This whole nonsensical idea that saluting started with Reagan is just stupid.

Calvin Coolidge saluting:
http://www.corbisimages.com/Enlargement/Enlargement.aspx?id=U93983P-A&ext=1

Dwight Eisenhower saluting:
http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/images/h68000/h68541.jpg

FDR Saluting:
http://history1900s.about.com/library/photos/blyfdr4.htm

Kennedy didn't salute because he couldn't. He didn't wave very often for the same reason. The guy was wearing a back brace during most of his time in office. Snapping to attention to render a salute wasn't exactly something he could have done even if he wanted to.



Doing it is only pandering, for political purposes.
I want him to stop it !


I see... Saluting is pandering for political purposes and you'd rather he pander to you.

 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 4 (view)
 
Men, tell me whats the attraction
Posted: 10/31/2009 7:44:46 AM

Why are men attracted to damaged women?


"Damaged" women are the only one's out there!



*ducks and runs*
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 30 (view)
 
Gold-digger is just a term men invented to
Posted: 10/3/2009 4:13:17 AM

I was reading a book by Steve Harvey Act Like A Lady, Think Like A Man where he said on pages 26-28 something to the effect that men have created a certain mindset among women that if she expects him to pay for her drink, then she is automatically a golddigger, that women should expect a real man to do that, that because there are so many men out there who walked out on their families leaving women supporting their kids alone now women take pride in paying for things men should be "man enough" to pay for.

This was the first time I read/hear such thing ever, anf from a guy!

He adds that although that he is aware of women who pursue/marry men for nothing more than the "hard cold cash", the term gold digger was invented by men to cop out on their financial responsibilty of supporting the woman they love.


IMO, the issue with whether a woman is or isn't a gold-digger has nothing to do with the guy's responsibilities to anyone else. It lies in the word "expects". I have no problems with paying for drinks or dinner for the women I date (and almost always do so...). I DO take exception when women display an attitude that they are somehow owed drinks/dinner just for gracing me with their presence.

Why should anyone "expect" to get more than what they give? (Especially during the early stages of the dating process.)
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 16 (view)
 
Prosecuting Authors of torture memos
Posted: 10/3/2009 3:46:04 AM

If you read my post I said retirement pay and the GI bill, I did not mention disability pensions that have been paid out since the continental congress authorized them in 1776 to promote enlistment.


And? Where did I say anything about disability pensions? The legislation passed in 1789 awarded pensions to military members who served as career service members - whether they had an service-related injuries or not. It was NOT a disability pension.


As for your claim of no GI bill I say bull$hit there has always been a GI bill since 1944 , it was revamped in the fifties and sixties and if I'm not mistaken by your age you fall under the Montgomery 1984, According to what I've found and I knew alot of this already as I said I've been surounded with the military all my life.


You can claim it's BS all you'd like but that just furthers your display of ignorance. The GI Bill as passed during Roosevelt's administration ran from 1944 to 1956. Vets who served during that period (WWII and Korean War Era) could use if after that point but those who entered the service after 1956 had no GI Bill benefits because there was no GI Bill in effect. It was started again as the Vietnam Era GI Bill in 1966 and that bill ran through December 31st, 1976. Those who entered the service between 1977 and mid-1985 again had no GI Bill (they had "VEAP"). Those who entered post-1985 had the Montgomery GI Bill and/or the later Post-9/11 GI Bill. So yes, you are mistaken on all points but hey, don't let stop you from shooting your mouth off about things you apparently know nothing about.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 2 (view)
 
Whats up with the copy and paste?
Posted: 10/2/2009 8:35:45 PM
People who do that are just playing a numbers game. For many it seems that the response rate is pathetically low (if their forums posts are to be believed) so they find every possible target within their area and bombard them with a canned message thinking that will speed up the process of actually engaging in conversation with someone.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 14 (view)
 
Prosecuting Authors of torture memos
Posted: 10/2/2009 8:30:31 PM
Ohhhhh! You've known some Marines and Navy people during your lifetime. Good for you! Since when did the handful of people you've met become the entire military? It sounds to me that YOU are the one that's been indoctrinated here.

What did you get wrong? How about all of it? GI Bill? What GI Bill? I don't have any GI Bill benefits and neither do thousands of others that entered the military around the same time I did. VA and retirement pay are all due to Democrats? Really? Since both were instituted at the Federal Level in 1789 when the Federalist Party controlled the Federal government and your Democratic Party didn't even exist until 35 years later, how exactly are either anything anyone owes the Democrats for?

The only joke here is you.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 12 (view)
 
Prosecuting Authors of torture memos
Posted: 10/2/2009 3:35:28 PM

[Sorry my experience with the military all my life has informed me on the indoctrination of the enlisted ranks.


Don't feel to badly for yourself. At least you are willing to admit right off the bat that you have nothing intelligent to say.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 15 (view)
 
Can someone classify Dating?
Posted: 10/2/2009 4:17:54 AM

Or , is it the fact that your with one person , thats just fresh and you dont call it a relationship?


Well now that would be pretty silly, wouldn't it? If you are "in a relationship" with someone and you go out somewhere on Saturday night did you go out on a "date" or did you "relationship" with them?

Dating = seeing other people with the intent of forming/furthing a romantic relationship.
Exclusive dating = Seeing one other person exclusively with the intent of furthing a romantic relationship.

The whole "in a relationship" thing is the part that bugs me. "Friends" is a relationship. "Strangers" is a relationship. Since I have never interacted with anyone who has responded to this thread thusfar I guess I could say that you are all strangers. Congrats! We're "in a relationship"!
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 21 (view)
 
Men Over 50 and Facial Hair
Posted: 10/1/2009 4:05:18 AM

Personally, I find that facial hair tends to "obscure" or hide a man's true and natural good looks.


You have a bit of a contradiction here. What is "true" or "natural" about shaving? You are aware that the "natural" thing for a guy to do would be to NOT shave and end up with facial hair, right?

But to address your basic question, most of the men you are encountering are probably divorced. Which means many of them got out of a relationship with a woman much like yourself and now they can do whatever they want to do without being nagged about it daily. They have a beard and/or 'stache because they couldn't have one when they were in their 20s/30s without hearing about it all the time.

And no, it isn't just you. There is a very lengthy thread on this very question in the Over 45 forum.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 10 (view)
 
Prosecuting Authors of torture memos
Posted: 10/1/2009 3:02:55 AM

Justice Thomas (along with Justice Scalia), in his dissent in Hamdan v. Rumsfelt wrote that:

"[T]he experience of our wars," Winthrop 839, is rife with evidence that establishes beyond any doubt that conspiracy to violate the laws of war is itself an offense cognizable before a law-of-war military commission. . . . . In [World War II], the orders establishing the jurisdiction of military commissions in various theaters of operation provided that conspiracy to violate the laws of war was a cognizable offense. See Letter, General Headquarters, United States Army Forces, Pacific (Sept. 24, 1945), Record in Yamashita v. Styer, O. T. 1945, No. 672, pp. 14, 16 (Exh. F) (Order respecting the "Regulations Governing the Trial of War Criminals" provided that "participation in a common plan or conspiracy to accomplish" various offenses against the law of war was cognizable before military commissions)."

The Nuremburg trials set the precedent that it was not only those who directly apply the criminal violence and other forms of brutality, but also government officials who authorized it and military officials who oversaw it. Could you argue, under this framework, that Yoo was involved in a conspiracy to violate the law?


The nutcases on Huffington Post and Democratic Underground have argued this for some time now and yet... even the Obama administration doesn't buy it.

Where are the witnesses and transcripts from these meetings where this conspiracy was set in motion? Where is the evidence that Yoo was a willing/cognizant part of this conspiracy and where is the evidence that his memos were his part of an effort to forward this conspiracy? Without conclusive proof of Yoo's knowing participation in any such conspiracy there isn't even a starting point for his prosecution.

Rumors of plots by the infamous "vast right-wing conspiracy" or the "Neo-con revolution" don't get you very far in court. They make great talking points for whipping up fervor amongst the gullible but when it comes time to prove they actually exist in a courtroom it's a different story.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 6 (view)
 
Laptop is going crazy on me
Posted: 9/30/2009 4:54:17 PM

Ok i have a weird problem using Ubuntu 9.04 on my laptop that seems to have started last month and seem to be getting worser.

Well last month my laptop decided to start playing silly buggers with me it would dim the display at random times even sometimes when i opened a program such as vlc, virtualbox, xbmc and i had to open power management every time so it would get the display back to 100% .

after about 2 days the programs started acting up on me like xbmc would crash or open office would freeze and i rebooted my laptop more than enough times to get a program working so i though it might be a corrupt system so did a re install everything went fine for about 1 and a half weeks then it went again first the dimming then the programs. then it corrupted the system well i think so.

I did a complete Hard disk swipe 3 times in the month due to it just failing on me and i haven't the slightest why it keeps doing it it's puzzling me. is my hard disk on it's way out or is it another problem im really confused and it's getting to the point now it's a joke.

Acer Aspire 5315 Notebook Laptop
Celeron M530 1.73GHz
15.4" TFT,
1 gig ram x1 and 2 gig ram x1
80GB Hard-drive
DVD±RW, Intel Graphics Media Accelerator X3100



Ubntu 9.04


I'm running into the same sort of issue with Ubuntu 9.04 on my Toshiba laptop. I've completely wiped the hard drive and done fresh installs a few times now but as soon as Update Manager runs and it downloads/installs the latest updates to anything the system takes on a life of it's own.

Once the system locks up there isn't anything I can do other than pull the power cord and battery and then when I restart it tells me the file system is corrupt. after 2 or 3 times running fsck to fix the file system the system pretty much gives up trying and it's time for a re-install again.

The Ubuntu help forums all suggest that the laptop power-save settings are the problem but I have them all disabled and still have the problems.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 2 (view)
 
Prosecuting Authors of torture memos
Posted: 9/30/2009 4:34:32 PM
This topic has been beaten up before and I've seen no argument that convinces me that he can be successfully prosecuted or sued. Yoo was an advisor. He wrote several legal opinions as did hundreds of others. As far as I know, it is still completely legal for a lawyer to offer their legal opinion on any issue. That doesn't mean their opinion is correct, but they aren't the person carrying out acts listed in the opinion either. I've yet to see anyone even suggest that Yoo actually directed or participated in an interrogation. If Yoo is subject to prosecution then so is every judge that has ever issued a ruling that has been over-turned.

Those who followed Yoo's advice and ignored other contradictory advice are another issue. Many are covered by immunity that covers most government employees that are acting in their official capacity but they might be subject to prosecution/civil suits depending on their level of involvement and what the specifics were.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 14 (view)
 
Entrepreneurship question
Posted: 9/30/2009 4:18:36 PM

What you are planning on doing is illegal. World of Warcraft can sue you for selling anything attached to the game.

Read the WoW terms of service.


What law is it in violation of? Don't confuse illegal (i.e. against the law) with violating a civil agreement (i.e. terms of service). Suing is a means of enforcing a CIVIL agreement. An act doesn't need to be illegal to be sued for it.



And for the record, an on-line contract can be difficult to inforce, but it is legally binding.


If you can't enforce it then it isn't legally binding. You can't have it both ways.

But as to the OP's question - who cares? You don't want them to log in while you are twiddling with their on-line persona? Change the email account and password the account is linked to and give the account back to them when you are done.

Even if you could manage to find a way to make your requirements legally binding in your location, they aren't going to be legally binding across the entire globe. As an on-line entity a user isn't required to sue you in your location if they choose to sue. What are you going to do if your customer in France decides to sue you in French courts? Are you going to fly around the globe trying to defend yourself?

I think you need to look at the reality of your proposal here. You are looking to start a business that provides a service to people who are cheating at a stupid game because they are to inept to play the game by the rules themselves. What are they going to tell a judge when they try to file a lawsuit against you? "Ummmm, yes your honor. I paid the guy $200 to help me cheat at a game and we got caught and I got thrown out of the game so I want my money back!". Are you really worried about some 16 year old paying court fees to sue you for an amount of money that is less than the court fees are to begin with?

It isn't very likely that you'd get sued by anyone other than the promoters of the game itself and if that happens your proposed restrictions aren't going to help you anyway.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 2 (view)
 
BUG: Persistent NEW MESSAGE indicator after deletion beyond 14-day period
Posted: 9/26/2009 5:54:20 PM
Wrong forum.

This is a site specific issue. Try the PoF Help forum.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 2 (view)
 
Unable to Get To www.plentyoffish.com?
Posted: 9/26/2009 5:53:13 PM
Have you asked any of the hotel staff if they filter content? Some do...
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 17 (view)
 
Overdraft fees
Posted: 9/26/2009 4:26:21 PM

There is at least one major difference between debit cards and checks. Debit cards deduct the amount immediately, checks do not post until AT LEAST the next day and often more than one day later.


That isn't completely accurate. Most people can use their debit card as a credit card and if you do so the charge will only appear when the retailer processes the charge. Many smaller retailers only process charges once a week.


(whether people deliberately write bad checks is not the issue)


Why not? No one is screaming for banks to eliminate overdraft fees for paper checks yet we all know that people float bad checks all the time. People can and do abuse debit cards in the same way.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 2 (view)
 
Phantom Message Notification
Posted: 9/25/2009 3:46:52 AM
This is a site specific issue and should be posted in the PoF Help forum instead of here. But it is a recurring problem for many so a quick search on that forum will come up with several threads with explanations.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 23 (view)
 
Daddy Issues!
Posted: 9/25/2009 3:27:22 AM

Now, i am not planning on getting my boy to call my boyfriend dad. Me and my boyfriend are just starting off, and i have planned not to let my little boy get to attached by having him around my boyfriend too much. Very little time does he spend with him when he is around. But, i don't see the harm in it if me and him last for 2-3 years and plan on getting married and are in the engaged phase.

Does anyone else not see this as a problem?


Well gee whiz. How could anyone POSSIBLY see anything wrong with that? I mean, come on, if your relationships last 2 or 3 years your kid will only grow up calling 7 or 8 different guys "daddy" before he moves out on his own. That's not so bad, is it?
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 7 (view)
 
A question for builder's, someone with knowledge of flats.
Posted: 9/17/2009 1:15:00 PM
While those who noted that no one can give you a specific answer I'd be a bit shocked if the floor couldn't support the weight of a treadmill. Those thing don't usually weight more than 200lbs (even the heavy ones at the gym...). The typical model that an individual would own usually weighs much less. That wouldn't be any different than having a friend come over and move around in your flat. If your floors can't support that then you should be moving out immediately anyway.

As for soundproofing, well that's anyone's guess.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 15 (view)
 
Taxing junk food!!!
Posted: 9/17/2009 12:59:26 PM

Listening to radio this morning and the host open the lines to the public to an opinion on taxing junk food ex....candy bars, pop, chips food that we all know is no good for us. I will ask the POF forums the same question do you think it is a good idea to tax junk food to help with the high cost of Health Care....

I personally think it is a great idea!


It is a stupid idea and completely backwards. If the idea is to curb the high cost of health care then the last thing you want is "healthy" people. What you want is people that die quickly.

It would be more direct to just tax the use of healthcare itself. That way, all those healthy people who live forever and make use of it are paying for it.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 10 (view)
 
Is antivirus neccessay with firewall?
Posted: 9/15/2009 1:51:32 PM
Think of it as you would your house. A firewall is like your front door. You can open it and allow friends and family in or you can close/lock it and keep strangers out.

What a firewall won't do for you is prevent you family/friends who are carrying the flu from passing it on to you once they are in your house. That is what the anti-virus software does for you.

Yes, you should run both an firewall and have some sort of anti-virus software. Adware/malware scanning is an additional bonus.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 5 (view)
 
Dating on CABLE TV
Posted: 9/15/2009 1:18:10 PM

Never tried it before, and really am not sure if im that interested in trying it, but do think it, just at its basic nature, would be likely to be more effective than your traditional online dating website. For my own reasons. So do you think that this is something you would consider doing if you havent already.


At the moment it doesn't seem to be worth using. I'd seen it before on Comcast but never looked into it (and it is a service owned by Comcast so it is limited to their subscribers). After seeing this thread I popped into it. There are 5 women in the "Over 30" category in the entire system. Anyway, I viewed one. On the screen they refer you to a WWW site.

I popped into that site and looked that their FAQ:

Question: How do I contact someone?
Answer: If you'd like to know how to contact someone on Dating On Demand, or how others can contact you if you already have a video profile, we kindly ask to please hang in there! Dating On Demand is currently being upgraded to better serve your dating needs, and the contact feature is temporarily not available. Please check back later for the new improved version.

In other words, you can't contact anyone. That pretty much makes it useless.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 28 (view)
 
arguments in a relationship...needed or not?
Posted: 9/15/2009 1:02:10 PM
I had a great-aunt/uncle who both passed away during 2008. They were married for 71 years when he passed. They never once argued about anything. They also never spent more than 8 hours apart during their entire marriage. They adored each other and they were that old, doddering couple you see walking down the street holding hands.

They didn't need at argue. They had calm discussions and could tell when the other felt passionately about something and if one wanted something badly enough, that was good enough for the other. Compromise was quickly reached (even if it meant that one of them had to settle for something they disliked).

IMO, if people get to the point where they argue, they've been holding in something that they should have opened their mouth about long before then. What it says to me is that they don't communicate with each other as well as they could.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 18 (view)
 
A Vast Wasteland
Posted: 9/14/2009 3:20:33 PM
I wouldn't say it's a vast wasteland. It seems more of a large suburban neighborhood with a few leaky cesspools.

There is a huge amount of useful information available to anyone that wishes to look for it. But like anything else, some people prefer to hang out in the seedy section of town for the excitement factor.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 47 (view)
 
Ridiculous car insurance rates
Posted: 9/14/2009 12:53:40 PM
You pay $200/month just for comprehensive and you aren't upset with that? You should be. I pay $16/month and that covers 3 vehicles.

Or did you confuse Comprehensive with Collision? Comprehensive covers things like a tree falling on your vehicle and such.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 10 (view)
 
Just wondering...
Posted: 9/12/2009 11:25:32 PM

If you meet someone on here, talk, date and become intimate. If the other person tells you they are only interested in you. Not interested in anyone else. And like you a lot and want to see where the relationship goes, is it within reason that I should be upset if she continues to keep her profile active?


Well that would pretty much depend on your response to what she told you wouldn't it? If you told her to bugger off there isn't any reason she shouldn't continue looking elsewhere is there?
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 20 (view)
 
Why not TORT Reform?
Posted: 9/12/2009 11:19:40 PM

And why do people sue? For sure, some do it to make money. But people are harmed and, in the absence of guaranteed care, they have to sue to make sure they will get covered. If some sort of system were in place that guaranteed they would get taken care of, they wouldn't have to sue.

Even when you have insurance, it doesn't cover everything. A man I know was blown up by a bomber - a case of mistaken identity by a really bad person who was caught almost a year later for other bad things. He was seriously burned, was in the hospital for a month, had several skin grafts. Even after he was sent home there was months of recovery. He had *very* good insurance and still there were many things they didn't cover. They didn't cover "wound care." His burns were such that, even after he went home, his bandages had to be changed three times a day and it took over an hour to do it. They had to be carefully peeled from his burns and skin grafts, some sort of ointment applied, and then carefully wrapped again. This went on for several weeks, every day, three times a day. Insurance did not cover it.

People seem to think these things cannot happen to them but they do.

What do *you* suggest to someone who has been injured?


We're talking about medical malpractice suits here. If you are blown up by a bomber you can't really sue your doctor for that now, can you? The doctor didn't cause the harm here.

Tort reform, doesn't eliminate the process of suing for malpractice. It is "tort reform", not "tort elimination". Yes, people are harmed. But a minor harm that doesn't result in permanent disability doesn't warrant a multi-million (or multi-billion) dollar settlement either.

Should an award cover the cost of correcting the harm? Sure it should. Should it cover the cost of correcting the harm, buy you a new mansion, a yacht and a small country? Nope!
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 15 (view)
 
I found someone! now what?
Posted: 9/12/2009 3:40:31 AM

I think it's highly inappropriate to be on a dating site while in a committed relationship.
I know you come on the forums, but you don't need a profile at all to do that.


Ummm. Yeah, ya do. Your account IS your profile. Someone doesn't need to fill out all of the profile details but it IS a profile none the less.

But overall, IMO, deleting the profile every time you start dating someone seems a bit silly. It is easy enough to change your status to "Not Single/Not Looking" and make that clear in the text. The profile can also be hidden so the user doesn't show up in searches and the body of the profile can be replaced with some silly space filler if need be.

As long as the two people involved are both aware the profile exists and you are honest with each other then there shouldn't be any problems. If you can't trust your partner to be honest with you about why they might come one here then why are you with them to begin with?
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 3 (view)
 
Her sister is coming
Posted: 9/12/2009 3:24:23 AM
IMO, you seem to be awfully concerned with what your girlfriend may or may not do with her money. It isn't any of your business.



Now that her sister will here, and that she will most likely be using my girlfriend's money I just don't see the romantic days happening for a while as she'll probably be 'forced' to look after her sister.


Errr.. so your g/f has been paying for all of your "romantic days" thusfar? Is that what has you concerned here? Who will you sponge off of if her sister is able to hit her up before you are?
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 3 (view)
 
too much in debt?
Posted: 9/11/2009 4:26:38 PM

i met a person on a dating site. we have talked about getting married. this person is in debt with a house she bought a couple of years ago and has a lot of other debt. maybe 20 - 30 thousand dollars worth. would you consider marrying this person?


I think I'd consider meeting them in-person long before I worried about getting married. But hey, that's just the way I am....
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 18 (view)
 
Why not TORT Reform?
Posted: 9/11/2009 3:05:33 PM
How is Washington Independent article citation of 2% not significant? U.S. healthcare spending is estimated to hit $2.5 Trillion for 2009. 2% of that is what? $58 Billion a year? And what is the cost of Obama's plan in comparison? If tort reform cut that portion of healthcare spending down to 1% it would cover about 33% of Obama's claimed cost for his plan.

The Bloomberg citation also doesn't mean much. “Of the top 25 awards so far this year, only one was a malpractice case.” Yeah, and? What about the hundreds of thousands of suits for lesser amounts? And why only look at awards? What is the cost of bringing/defending ALL of the suits?
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 14 (view)
 
if you want your pic to stick
Posted: 9/9/2009 4:03:30 AM


#3 Sunglasses in dating headshots went out of style in 1980!-that was about 40 % of pics next delete

#5-Hello out there oh hiker man in (Timbuktu?) Can't see you close enough to make out your face Next delete


And this is the problem with random users being able to vote pics off. The "rules" very clearly say that the face must be visible for the MAIN PROFILE pic. These two you are clicking delete for are perfectly acceptable for any other pic. Yet the power-hungry decide to make up little rules all by themselves...
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 10 (view)
 
Insecurities
Posted: 9/8/2009 4:58:46 PM

Although there it is against the forum rules to post polarizing threads, I just want to know what insecurities men in positions of authority at work have in their relationships or starting one? Example: military. Of course, this would extend to just about anybody. I also want to know if they can separate themselves from that mindset of work and switch to relationship mode. Some people bring that attitude of work home with them and sometimes forget to switch that off.


They have the same insecurities that anyone else has. Why would they be any different?

And why do so many people assume that just because someone is in the military they are incapable of having feelings or expressing emotions? Being in the military doesn't make one into a robot. Can an accountant separate their work from their personal life?
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 9 (view)
 
Respect, Honor, & Sex
Posted: 9/8/2009 4:53:37 PM

My brother is a born again Christian, and I dance in a Burlesque show. He prays for me, and says that the men who watch my shows aren't "honering me" with their thoughts. What's dishonerable about finding someone attractive, and thinking about sex with them?


If a family member told me that they were "praying for me" I'd ask them how it is that they are supposedly "honoring me with their thoughts" by assuming that I'm unaware of my actions and incapable of taking care of myself.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 3 (view)
 
do guys just like the idea of me?
Posted: 9/8/2009 3:58:11 AM

am i unapproachable when it comes to single guys and only attached people have the confidence to hit on me? or is there something else that i am not aware of ?


No one is going to be able to answer this without actually observing you in a public setting. Some women do give off a "not available" (or at least a "not readily available") vibe.

It might be that the attached guys that do chat you up figure they have little or nothing to lose. If you shoot them down they can always go back to their current S/O.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 3 (view)
 
Missing Human Touch
Posted: 9/5/2009 6:47:57 AM

have a friend of mine who has worked at a legitimate spa as a masseuse for many years. It's well known in that industry that the percentage of single people who get massages is much higher than people who have relationships. There seems to be a direct correlation that people will pay for a massage just to experience being touched. I find this a sad commentary on our culture.


Correlation and causation are two very different things. Making the assumption that something with a correlation is the cause usually results in error. Single people may also get massages more often simply because their stress levels are higher because they don't have a S/O to go home to and complain about daily life events. It may have nothing to do with touch at all.


When we crave touching so deeply, does that need cause us to make poor choices in dating, accepting dates with people who aren't a good match, we move too quickly to physical intimacy, and we make decisions that we regret later? What has your experience been?


Some people are "touchy" people. Some aren't. I don't think it makes much difference in who or how often they date. It may make a difference in how long they maintain a relationship if the two aren't on the same page.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 13 (view)
 
Safety issues at POF
Posted: 9/5/2009 6:09:27 AM

We've all heard about the dangers of meeting someone on a first date in a non-public place...which caused me some alarm when I read the following advice given by POF in someone's "chemistry view", under the category of openness:

.... On first dates, perhaps you might suggest to your partner that the two of you spend a quiet night having dinner at one of your respective homes instead of going out to a restaurant or club.

Who writes these up? Does this advice bother anyone else?


Perhaps I'm simply reading the statement differently from others here but I get a totally different take-away from it. The statement suggests discussing a private dinner while ON the first date - not FOR a first date...

Hard to say what the actual "feel"for the intent is without the entire context.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 10 (view)
 
Lets make it more social - Facebook / iPhone integration, thoughts?
Posted: 9/2/2009 3:42:29 AM

I see these as huge benefits to users and would love to see it implemented sooner than later.


These are, at best, minor benefits to the users that might wish to use them. I mean really, think about it. You find some woman on here that piques your interest. She tells you she's not interested. You're going to turn around and start hitting on her friends? Sharing credentials is a benefit? Really? So someone gets ahold of your Facebook password and they can muck with your profile here too? That could be interesting... You, of course, won't mind if your buddies decide that your suddenly gay and change your profile here for you right?

And for all of these supposed benefits, what benefit is there to those that run PoF? Once linked to Facebook you can just as easily play there as you can here. But being that PoF subsists off of ad revenue that drops when user's chat elsewhere. I doubt Facebook is suddenly going to start sharing ad revenue with PoF... What might be of minor benefit to a few users here has HUGE drawbacks to the site owners here.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 3 (view)
 
bueller.....bueller.....bueller - PROFILE REVIEW ON ISLE 2 PLEASE!!!
Posted: 8/31/2009 4:36:49 PM
#1 - Use spell/grammar check on it. It's not terrible but you have a few missing letters in there.

#2 - in your first 5 paragraphs you have a total of 19 sentences. 18 of them begin with the word "I" (The remaining one quickly references "me" too! lol). I.... I.... I.... play with things and find some way to change things up a bit.

#3 - You give a pretty good picture of "you" but not much about what you seek. If a woman is reading your profile how does she judge if she's a fit with what you seek? Yeah, you have your list but to be honest, it's pretty lame.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 5 (view)
 
Dating men without kids an unreasonable request?
Posted: 8/31/2009 3:53:45 PM
No, it isn't unreasonable. It's your preference and you are entitled to it. It will limit your options but that's the sort of trade-offs we all live with every day.

If guys respond to you with negative emails about it make use of the "block" feature and cease any further discussion with them about it.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 19 (view)
 
Sex & Guilt
Posted: 8/31/2009 1:08:09 PM

I battled for equality in sexual relationships with men, but they always felt like they had all the power - and because they could make me feel cheap and worthless, they did. But then I hated myself for allowing them to do this to me...


This is absolute tripe. You have no way of knowing that "they" thought or felt they had any power at all. It isn't about what "they" thought/felt at all. It is 100% about what YOU thought/felt. If "they" had the power it is because YOU gave it to them. No one can make you feel cheap and worthless but yourself.

You were worried about being rejected and judged. Those are your own insecurities showing. Those are YOUR feelings. Own your feelings and quit blaming others for what you feel.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 2 (view)
 
Are the pre-marriage rituals BS?
Posted: 8/29/2009 12:52:32 PM

Why would you want to see naked strippers dancing and giving you lap dances if you're sure that you have already found the woman/man you want to do these things with?


I've probably been to 30 or 40 bachelor parties during my life. Only 1 had strippers of any sort. It would be a mistake to assume that strippers and "one last fling" is all there is to it. The over-whelming majority I have attended have been to celebrate the impending marriage, nothing else. (And several of them have been mixed-gender parties.)



Its funny how people give all the time and consideration to material things and instant gratification but never once think that if you love, respect and are faithful to someone, thats all it takes to make a marriage work.


A lovely thought... It's not attached to any sort of reality but... lovely none the less.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 13 (view)
 
Hardware Issue (Hard Drive)
Posted: 8/29/2009 11:06:40 AM

Computer freezing on the Windoze splash screen is odd...


It isn't odd at all. In this sort of case it should be expected. You hit on the main issue yourself...


The fact that it hangs during the Windows splash screen tells me that it is a driver issue, really.


Bingo! When someone installs Windows, the install routine detects all the necessary drivers for the devices on the motherboard. When you replace the motherboard with a different model you change all of those devices. Windows is trying to start up with all the wrong device drivers.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 2 (view)
 
Manipulation or acceptable behaviour?
Posted: 8/26/2009 11:49:26 AM

've been perplexed by how many people don't see the difference between manipulation and acceptable behaviour. The latest form of manipulation I've seen is people who appear like nice guys who use what women crave most to get what they want. Being emotionally demonstrative.


How do you know that the guys simply isn't more emotionally demonstrative than you are? Why do you assume that a man showing his emotions is manipulating? Perhaps the problem here is entirely your's?


Has anyone ever been caught in such a situation and then later learned that their new found interest couldn't maintain this level of intimacy exponentially and or that their behaviours switched when the feelings were not reciprocated? Or even worse they accuse you of being exactly what you are trying to avoid in the opposite sex? ie.. emotionally unavailable, cold, emotionless, etc... etc...


When are you emotionally demonstrative towards someone and it isn't reciprocated, what do you do? Do you continue doing the same thing or do you change your behaviors?


And do you think they are being manipulative or genuine?


You don't provide enough info to make any sort of determination here. I have little doubt that there are cases of manipulation but... there are also going to be men out there that are more emotionally demonstrative then you are. Contrary to popular opinion, men can and do show their emotions.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 7 (view)
 
Do you think about the difference?
Posted: 8/20/2009 1:43:36 PM

But I have guys my age talking to me, asking me to hang out, are they just ignoring the whole daughter thing, I means thats a pretyt big elephant to not notice.


Until/unless things get a little more serious than just hanging out is there any reason to acknowledge the elephant? Unless you are bringing the kid with you when you hang out, why should they care?
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 15 (view)
 
Speaking the language in a foreign place
Posted: 8/18/2009 3:53:06 AM

What female language would I use to get my "interest" across to this guy?


Whats wrong with plain old English? Why not just suck it up, walk up to him and say "I find you to be attractive and interesting and I think we might do pretty well together. Interested?"

Nah, that'd never work! Waaaaay to simple.
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 54 (view)
 
Why are Americans so Anti Socialist?
Posted: 8/17/2009 4:07:21 PM

From my lofty moral perch...


Your opening words probably do more to identify the problem with socialism in the U.S. than anything else. People who support it generally take their position on their "lofty moral perch" without having any actual moral authority to do so.

They talk about things being "fair" and, of course, choose to define "fair" to mean whatever they want it to mean. Who cares if it isn't "fair" to others? They also tend to speak about large social programs and how these will help so many people but when it comes down to the fine print, they want someone else to pay for it.

The annual cost for healthcare in the U.S. is currently running just over $6,000 per person. Is EVERYONE is the U.S. willing to pay an additional $6,000/year per family member in taxes for socialized coverage? That would make things pretty simple wouldn't it? Eliminate all the middle-men and create one huge, single-payer system that everyone would use - no exceptions. THAT would be socialized medicine. Everyone would pay the same amount into the system and everyone would get the same treatment from the system.

But NO ONE advocates for that. Why not? That's easy enough to answer. People want all of the positive benefits of any program. They aren't willing to suck up the negatives. The negatives in this case are paying for the system and as soon as that is brought up those in favor of such a system start looking for someone else to stick with paying while they enjoy the benefits. - all of course, in the name of being "fair".
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 66 (view)
 
Where are the love-help articles for men?!
Posted: 8/17/2009 11:51:08 AM
These sorts of books and articles are geared toward women for one simple reason - women pay attention to (and pay their $$ for) them. Open an issue of Cosmo or any mag targeted at teen girls and there are a host of articles/columns that cover the full spectrum geared toward soothing women's insecurities and providing advise about dating and relationships. Open Maxim (for example) and you'll find a quick quip telling men to shine their shoes and put on clean pants before they go out on a date.

But the same sort of thing applies to the dieting industry, clothing and a host of others. It's all driven by marketing. Society builds insecurities up in women and then provides them the "help" (in the form of books/magazines) to get past them. That same society tells men we aren't supposed to have (or at least show) and insecurities. How can they sell us something to fix what they tell us we aren't supposed to have?
 Jim978
Joined: 7/10/2009
Msg: 8 (view)
 
Are preferences dealbreakers?
Posted: 8/17/2009 3:46:55 AM
IMO, preferences become dealbreakers when there are ample people who meet the preference.

If you state that your preference is for 5'2", blue-eyed blondes and you get 1,000 people that meet that criteria you won't bother paying much attention to anyone that isn't a 5'2", blue-eyed blonde. i.e. it becomes a dealbreaker.

If you get zero people meeting that criteria you'll bend on your preference. i.e. it isn't a dealbreaker.
 
Show ALL Forums