You MUST be Canadian. It's been my experience that most crooks adopt the "Spray & Pray" method of gunfighting. They aren't very accurate & definitly not very well trained in firearms use...even when shooting at each other. The homeowner has a DISTINCT advantage in knowing their own home...and how to defend it with a weapon they've practiced with.

On another note, guns are used for MORE than just home defense, they're also used to keep predatory animals at bay.

If Canucks were allowed to carry pistols, that young lady would likely be alive & healthy.

This is why in media, video and movies we get this evil alien disinformation … The Star nations are not evil at all. We humans have psychopaths as leaders and people with great wealth and influence all pretending to be goodie two shoes. They may fool you, but will never fool me.

First let me say, two things. I don't believe in UFOs since I've never seen one

Liberals see the Constitution as an archaic document that has little relevance in the world today. After all it was written by some old white guys whose views don't represent the people of color, minorities. Liberals feel they know better than the founders what is best for the country.

They view it as an ever changeable document to suit the "needs" of our time without following the requirement to pass amendments.

Conservatives view the Constitution as the highest law in the land, that is timeless in it's wisdom. It was, is and will be relevant for all generations of Americans. They view the founding fathers as perhaps the most fortuitous gathering of wise men in the history of the world.

They view it as a sacred document whose ideas and ideals need to be preserved and only changed carefully using due diligence utilizing the constitutionally prescribed amendment process.

True, but the article was made unavailable initially

I only brought it up to illustrate the attempt at suppression of information, you know like Obamas Thesis equivalent paper mysteriously disappearing....

you check Snopes they say that access to Michelle Obamas Thesis was made unavailable until After the election

uh, dude, try not sending hateful messages full of immature insults and racist remarks if you want to pass yourself off as 1.) a christian 2.) a gentleman 3.) an adult (dude, you are 45, come on...)

^^^^^^ All this ranting has nothing to do with the thread.

You obviously are unable to comprehend it if it went over your head the first time

Fox news ratings speak for themselves. Seems that Fox has the highest ratings of any Cable News network. Guess many others like seeing what is happening in the world too.

Not only is Fox the highest rated Cable News network it seems to have more viewers than CNN and MSNBC combined, actually a bit over a 1/2 million more viewers the CNN and MSNBC combined.

Most of the week was jokes about Obama's Nobel Prize, not just Fox but all the other major networks, and many networks overseas. (just look at previous threads and you will find a slew of jokes and sites for jokes).

Warren Buffet then gives the same charity 10 times the Prize amount as a congratulations to Obama.

What do you think?

These are just a few of the misstatements/lies Obama made during his campaign and in his book.

No proof they exist.

Boy is that a great statement considering all the misstatements from his books, campaign and just the last 9 months he has been in office.

Lessons learned over the past 8 years I am sorry to say.

Ghosts are not real

The decline in Barack Obama's popularity since July has been the steepest of any president at the same stage of his first term for more than 50 years.

Name calling or racial bigotry on any side is not right just because of differences in thought or appearances.

Wonder Woman doesn't even wear glasses in her alternate identity. She relies solely on the masking power of a Stars and Stripes bustier - apparently nobody looks at her face when she's wearing it.

The fact is that this award is still at issue today.
From the Washington Times they found that the committee was split.

Much opinion and criticism but thats about it....

Why is it necessary to use slurs or insults just because someone or some group is different or believes differently than you and is not a threat to your own freedoms.

Our country was founded on the freedoms speech and differences. Our country's freedoms are about the ability to be different and think differently without people singling you out, as long as there are no threats to others. Its been a long battle to keep these freedoms and to make them available to all.

Apparently racial slurs are OK if you disagree with the Democrat party line.

These are just a few of the many jokes that are floating around the internet...they don't include some of late night shows or that many news station comments.

Very true, and it is where I ended up to since no one has provided any information that disproves my contentions

we can argue about the words manipulate influence or whatever but the committee chairman made it very obvious by his own admissions that the prize was awarded not based on what Obama had done but on what the committee would like him to do......

I may be wrong but in my opinion Obama got the award simply for having similar political and world views to the committee members.

He accomplished very little if anything tangible to deserve a Peace Prize and the committee awarded it to him hoping that in some way it would influence his future decisions... After all of these pages there has been no proof offered that contradicts my contention..

because saying you saved jobs is not an indicator of anything other than the willingness of your supporters to believe anything......if we apply this logic then everyone who presently has a job has a saved job........funny how this "saved" jobs has never been used before as an indicator...it is only being used because Obama administration knows that if jobs being created were the litmus test he would be failing miserably..

This is not an award that one usually sees within the skits of comedians. Since Obama won the prize it has been the point of many opening late night comedian shows and jokes throughout the media, and internet.

As to something being deleted from the thread, you might want to speak to the moderators or read the rules. There are ways to present information on any thread and moderators don't just go around deleting posts just because of nonsense complaints.

I really think you are fishing for a reason where there is not one.

Do some of you honestly believe that all these folks would turn their guns on their own families? Some may, but I'm sure the majority would not; the US is more intergrated then it was in the time of Lincoln and Davis (the Civil War).

Well since you seem to be anti gun

liberals think the constitution doesn't matter.

George Washington's political philosophy were not those of Obama, Pelosi and Reed.

Its there you just don't want to see it

It is interesting to see how people who support Obama support everything about him even things that he has no control of like winning the Prize, that level of devotion is kind of scary..

Whether he keeps the money, donates it, or whatever, isn't the point. The point is, is he even allowed to accept it without Congress' consent? Geez, don't be so defensive...I think it's an interesting question and might even set a precedent one way or the other.

so if we were to meet on the street..and we had a discussion would you then insist that any comment I make..needs to be supported?..would you tell me to go to the library and bring back books as proof?..

Cite?

Right, but the amendment also covers harassment and emotional distress. Its interesting that people keep leaving that part out. I think thats the problem the Republicans had with it. It still does not make it an Anti-rape amendment.

sigh...........there are none so blind as those who refuse to see.................

while its proubly pointless.heres a site that shreds the anti gunners claims

http://www.guncite.com/

I watched the video and listened to what the committee had to say the rationale they used to justify picking Obama and was left wondering how any one could see it as anything more than a Political statement

and a subtle effort to influence Foreign policy

Obama may have been chosen to Win the Prize...but in my opinion did not do anything to EARN it

here you go msquared....this is "handgun inc's"agenda

And you still have not sited any concrete examples of what he has done to deserve the Nobel