online dating service
REGISTER | MAIL/PROFILE | HELP | NOW ONLINE | SEARCH | RATING | FORUMS | SUCCESS STORIES

 

     
Posted In Forum:
Home   login   MyForums  
Show ALL Forums  
 
 Author Thread: Why pull out of Afghanistan ? ?
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 45 (view)
 
Why pull out of Afghanistan ? ?
Posted: 12/6/2006 11:00:56 AM
Speaking entirely separately from the Iraq situation, we should not withdraw from Afghanistan we should put more troops in and clean out the mountainous regions where Al Queda actually hides.

Iraq has sucked in resources that might have really made a difference in Afghanistan, and is the only place where we know Al Queda to be training and recruiting (specifically to hit us).

Our letting Pakistan 'finish' the Afghan thing was a huge mistake, they are not only ill prepared for the task but riddled with sypathizers to Al Queda.

We're going to wind up 'losing' in both of these places if we don't do something fast. Iraq may be beyond repair, but that is not the case in Afghanistan (unless we continue to ignore it).

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 22 (view)
 
Accused killer was 'disgusted' that transgender teen was male
Posted: 6/23/2006 5:23:59 AM
While I think common courtesy would dictate that a transgendered person should discuss this with potential partners, the killer was a grown man who made a choice to have sex with this person, and murder is murder.

Could a court find mitigating circumstances? Of course, especially in today's environment, but wrong is wrong and the killer knows that. It's not like 'she' raped him, he was willing.

I would have been disgusted too, but disgust is a far cry from murder.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 21 (view)
 
High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
Posted: 6/15/2006 4:04:42 PM
K-town

I understand your position as a policeman, but when those 'few and far between' instances occur it creates a preventable situation where either a citizen or policeman can be killed by mistake. No one enters my house that way without receiving fire or whatever defense I have handy, as yelling police and wearing jackets has been used by several groups of criminals raiding homes.

My point is this: I would never fire on real police, so showing an ID could save their lives and by extension mine.

Lastly, re "better safe than sorry", I refer back to my quote in my earlier post and disagree.

MajMike

p.s. I mean no disrespect nor do I wish ill upon any LE personnel, I'm just a Libertarian who is appalled by the ever-increasing presence of Big Brother in our lives.
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 3 (view)
 
We can assume people the police search have NO right to privacy: High Court Backs Police No-Knock Searches
Posted: 6/15/2006 12:12:56 PM
This is one more step towards a police state, unless a tactical entry (read SWAT) is required there is no reason not to knock and annouce. We have to quit giving up essential restraints on govt in order to gain some microscopic perceived advantage in fighting crime.

We don't we abandon this bs war on drugs, legalize the minor ones and stop wasting time and money on things we can never end. Is this law about a crack addict or a pot smoker? Don't you see the difference there?

And to reality here, if someone barges in my house without warning they are liable to get killed. Screaming "police" at me doesn't prove anything, anydody can do that, just like anybody can get hats and jackets that look official. However, if they knock and identify themselves to me no mixups can occur, and they can still enforce the law.

"Any man that would give up liberty for safety deserves neither." Benjamin Franklin

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 21 (view)
 
Mexico legalizes possession of small amts of street drugs, but not manufacture or selling
Posted: 5/4/2006 5:00:08 PM
Maybe they were afraid of illegal immigration?

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 15 (view)
 
Mexico legalizes possession of small amts of street drugs, but not manufacture or selling
Posted: 5/4/2006 8:51:02 AM
Viva Mexico!

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 93 (view)
 
Army Recruiters Get Desperate
Posted: 5/2/2006 6:03:33 AM
marita

I'm a cynic, so I believe those 10 things apply not only to a military career but to most things in life, ala caveat emptor. For some the military is a good choice, whether it's for one tour or a career, for others it's not the right path.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 88 (view)
 
Army Recruiters Get Desperate
Posted: 4/29/2006 3:47:01 PM
Neither party is the answer to our difficulties, until we learn to meet in the middle and quell the extremists on either side (include them too but not as voices of reason) we are doomed to waste our blood/treasure on petty infighting.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 25 (view)
 
What is it with the Mormon thing
Posted: 4/28/2006 6:12:26 AM
To those who got their 'knowledge' of the LDS church from ex/anti Mormons websites/books, I ask you to remember they might not be the most balanced sources. Not only are they often bitter about personal experiences and/or offenses real or imagined, but they must put their tales into a profitable format (the authors et al).

That there are different ideas and doctrine from Protestant Christianity no Mormon denies, that was the purpose of the Restoration, to give us back what was lost (imo and per the church). But, just as I would expect you to seek other sources if all your info was from the missionaries, you need to do so in addition to these hate sites.

The LDS church does not and has not condoned/participated in plural marriage (polygamy) in over a century, and in fact any member who does so is excommunicated. Some splinter groups who have split off at various times in the Church's history still practice polygamy, but do so in secret and are their own religion, they are not LDS.

If you are interested in a well-written and readable book describing the differences between Evangelicals and Mormons, read "How Wide the Divide", it looks at what the doctrine really says and gives a very good rational for both sides. You still form your own opinion, but at least you have seen the whole picture.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 7 (view)
 
What is it with the Mormon thing
Posted: 4/25/2006 10:21:17 AM
All

I am a convert to the LDS church who investigated most faiths in my search, and I too find it amazing the things I see written that we 'believe' that are just ridiculous. But the same happens to other faiths, see the recent vilification of Islam due to their radical element.

As with most "anti" anything sites, the authors are usually either folks who know nothing but their own propaganda or those who left or were excommunicated and are bitter. No institution run by men is perfect, so neither is any church including the LDS, although I do believe most of our lay clergy really try to do their best and seek their answers in prayer.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 5 (view)
 
Osama alive?
Posted: 4/25/2006 6:50:44 AM
rainpanda

I too have seen the backlash against Muslims in general, and like all such stereotyping it's wrong. But I have to say I don't think 'most' Americans feel that way, though I admit the ones who do are very vocal about it.

Since 911 the religion of Islam has become part of the American conciousness, for good and ill. But I sincerely believe (and hope/pray) that our people are smart enough to realize that there is good and bad in every religion, race, creed, etc., and true Islam really is a religion of peace. It teach faith, charity, brotherhood, all through surrender to God's will, but some mullahs use their will to twist those teachings and make it something ugly, that's not Islam.

My longest tour in the Middle East was with a diverse group, including two Muslims (Americans), and we were able to see much of the local community (before the current conflict). I never felt in danger and everyone I interacted seemed to be good people, my only complaint was the way the poor and common workers (usually TCN's, third country nationals) were treated and underpaid. But God knows we have that in the US too, along with our very own homegrown terrorists, anybody remember Timothy McVeigh?

About free speech, I have written Bush, my Senators and Congressmen, and other public officials who can do something about it. Just as I opposed the Patriot Act, I abhor the way we have surrendered some basic freedoms to gain a marginal (and possibly illusory) measure of safety. Have you seen the movie "Uncon" about his inauguration and the civil right's violations there? We must resist wherever possible, I like how many libraries have started shredding their book registries when the books are returned to keep the Feeb's from using them. Other businesses are doing the same, small but significant acts of conciousness.

Let's hope a backlash at the grassroots level might shift our paradigm.

A few relevant quotes I like:

"Government is not reason. Government is not eloquence. It is force. And, like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master." General George Washington

"A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul."
George Bernard Shaw

"A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government." Edward Abbey

"There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws...you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt."
Ayn Rand


MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 16 (view)
 
Gangsta rappers VS. the U.S. Military
Posted: 4/23/2006 4:18:09 PM
Maybe we should regulate pool and require a license, it's obvious society cannot ignore this moral crisis (insert Monty Python reference here).

I've seen a knifefight erupt after a pool game (dude tried to welsh), and I saw two women fight over a guy playing pool, I thought one of the suddenly kissed the other one (insert lesbian fantasy here) when she drew back . . . . and spit the other girls bottom lip on the floor. This is a dangerous game folks.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 59 (view)
 
Rummy is number one in my book. I would, rather serve under him then anyone like William S. Cohen or
Posted: 4/23/2006 4:12:53 PM
While I have lost faith in Rumsfeld myself, I also believe that any change of SecDef right now would give us a lame duck with no power given the upcoming election. Plus I still subscribe to the top down theory, so if the same guy is the 'decider' (smirk) then why would we expect different results?

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 3 (view)
 
Osama alive?
Posted: 4/23/2006 3:50:56 PM
anticon

While there appears to be some confidence that this is in fact Bin Laden (if one trusts the CIA, haha), there has been discussion about whether or not the US would conceal his death should they manage to find and kill him. His death would be a martyrdom and therefor a problem for the efforts against radical Islam, if I was Bush and it was confirmed we 'got' him, I would tell them to drop a mountain on top of him and forget the last 24 hours ever happened.

Beyond the martyr aspect there is the political one you pointed out, when govt can focus people on a specific target they get a lot of latitude in other arenas (see the knee-jerk Patriot Act and the Padilla detention). But, IF he is even in marginal control of Al Queda, then he is a real threat and needs to be neutralized (see mountain reference above).

The mistake he makes in his (alleged) message is simple, we are not at war with Islam. However, we and most civilized nations are at war with RADICAL Islam, and rightfully so (imo). The new millenium has no room for those who prefer slavish obediance to peaceful coexistence, who wish to repeal free speech and women's rights and return us to a fuedal theocracy. Maybe the US et al isn't the right motivator, but these guys (all male remember) are living in the 18th century and want US to accomodate THEM, and are going to have to be dragged into the future kicking and screaming by somebody.

It just sucks that so many innocents have to suffer too, whether through the harsh creed of radical Islam or through Allied mistakes and accidents.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 5 (view)
 
Why Iraq Was a Mistake - By LIEUT. GENERAL GREG NEWBOLD (RET.)
Posted: 4/18/2006 2:11:33 PM
rks58

There is a very simple reason that no new 'nuclear' (weapons not energy) nations are desired by the World at large, that power is so terrible and feared that it can only make the world more dangerous. Since we cannot disinvent them We (the World, not just the US) only wish them to decrease, with the eventual hope of a global ban upon them.

MajMike

p.s. With nukes, if the get the US they also get Canada, they call it collateral damage.
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 85 (view)
 
Army Recruiters Get Desperate
Posted: 3/31/2006 5:11:09 AM
Here's an article from military.com which I thought pertinent to this thread.


10 Secrets to Visiting a Recruiter

Recruiters are generally honest and trained professionals, but keep in mind they need you to sign up to meet their goals. Meeting a recruiter should be an informative, stress-free experience. Print these 10 secrets, take them with you, and make sure you're prepared for your interview.

1. Get it in writing. There is no such thing as a verbal promise. Guarantees such as MOS, bonuses, GI Bill, and duty station must be reflected in the enlistment contract.

2. Don't make emotional decisions. Never make the decision on your first or second visit. Take your time. Don't make a snap decision and don't let your emotions influence it.

3. Go with a buddy. Talking to a recruiter by yourself is a bad idea. Take a friend, your parents or someone else you trust. Remember they will try to recruit your buddy too.

4. Can I have the job I want? Most likely. Score well on the Armed Service Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) and you can get the job you want, assuming you meet any other specified criteria, such as physical or security requirements. Keep in mind, however, that certain jobs may not be available due to over manning. In that case, you may want to wait until there is an opening for the job you want. Depending on how important the choice of a particular branch is to you, consider the possibility that another service may be able to offer you the job you want. Practice and take the ASVAB. Consider retesting if you believe you can achieve a better score and qualify for the job you want. Make sure that any guarantees are in the enlistment contract.

5. Can I be stationed where I want? Military people move, but recruiters sometimes offer programs for qualified candidates to start at the base or in the region of their choice.

6. Can I get paid more? If you have special training or education, you could qualify to go in with higher rank and pay than others. Ask the recruiter, as these high-demand specialties change.

7. Can I choose when to start? The delayed entry program is often used to allow high school students to graduate, but it can be used for other reasons, such as training in the spring or fall to avoid extreme weather.

8. How long should I sign up for? The length of your commitment often determines the amount of benefits (like money for college) you'll receive. Make the recruiter spell these out for you. Remember the shortest term possible is generally two years but some job training requires a longer commitment. The service will give you plenty of opportunities to re-enlist, extend your term, or make it a career. Enlisting for two years also makes you eligible for re-enlistment bonuses later and lets you keep your options open down the line.

9. Correct the contract before signing. Typos and errors can cost you money, put you in the wrong job or send you to the wrong place. Get the contract perfect before you sign it. Don't let anyone tell you it can be corrected later.

10. Remember you're signing up to be a soldier, airman, Sailor, Marine or Coast Guardsman. It is important that you are candid and frank with your recruiter. Don't hesitate to ask questions. You should work to get the job you want, but understand that your role as a servicemember comes first. Don't sign up just to get money for college or a job. Be honest with yourself. Serving in the military is not like a regular job. You cannot just quit when the going gets tough. The military requires diligence, dedication and a commitment to teamwork. Remember, your actions could potentially cost or save lives.

Bonus Tip: The Buddy Deal. Services have programs where friends who sign up together can go through training together, be stationed together or even start with advanced rank and pay just because you sign up together.


All good tips, because caveat emptor applies here most of all.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 28 (view)
 
Army Recruiters Get Desperate
Posted: 3/20/2006 10:25:58 AM
southrn outlaw

God bess the PJ's! They were there with me at the Khobar bombing, Bosnia in Christmas '95, and other undisclosed locations, and their skills and especially their calm leadership in crisis mode always impressed me.

rainpanda


I'm wondering if you can tell me, if a recruiter wanted to get out of that pressure cooker, how difficult would it be for a recruiter to ask to be reassigned to combat or whatever other field s/he was trained in prior to becoming a recruiter? Are recruiting assignments something that generally come at midpoint in a military career, and it would be like career suicide to try to get reassigned? And can you tell me, what happens to recruiters who chronically miss their quotas? I'm just trying to get a better idea what the circumstances are that might lead a recruiter to make the totally wrong decision to threaten or to be untruthful or non-forthcoming to potential recruits.


They can ask to be reassigned like anyone else, but depending on 1) what point they are in their tour, 2) availability of replacement personnel (recruiters are hand selected and require lengthy training), 3) and current military requirements (a catch-all), it may take a while to get replaced through channels.

Recruiters are usually an E-5 to E-7 when chosen which puts them around 6-12 years of service, and they can return to their original job if they so choose (although after all the training the service will try to talk them into staying on), or cross-train to another field depending on the needs of the service and their nearness to retirement.

A recruiter who misses quotas will be questioned about it, much depends on where he/she is relative to their peers. If they underperform consistantly they will get bad reviews, but if everyone is having the same problem Command understands that other factors are involved. So there is a lot of pressure on recruiters, but outright lies are never part of the package.

Nothing justifies lies and threats, and the explanation is the human weakness in us all. He thought it would get him what he wanted and he ignored what was right for this perceived expediancy. But the military is held to higher standards and our recruiters are supposed to exemplify that to the public, not to do the opposite and cast a stain upon us.

I still say if he's guarding convoys next week in Fallujah I think the others will get the message.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 19 (view)
 
Army Recruiters Get Desperate
Posted: 3/19/2006 10:21:11 AM
snowman

Supporting liars isn't patriotic it's just plain wrong, just as vilifying all recruiters is also wrong.

I don't want a guy who feels betrayed/lied to by the military in my unit, because he (usually) won't pull his weight and brings down the morale of the entire unit.

MajMike

Major(R), USAF
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 9 (view)
 
New Obstacle to Military Recruiters: Parents
Posted: 3/19/2006 10:10:08 AM
I think good parents should ensure that their children see all sides of the equation when considering ANY career choice (or other big choice while still in high school), and especially with the committment required of the military.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 2 (view)
 
Federal Judge allows Bush Administration a limited look inside Google
Posted: 3/19/2006 10:02:31 AM
A Left Coast Cali judge actually getting one right? Way to go Judge Ware!!

MajMike

 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 28 (view)
 
Officials Make Public Intoxication Arrests Inside Bars
Posted: 3/19/2006 9:58:22 AM
Legal or not makes no difference, this is anti-American fascist crap.

Omage to civil disobediance demands we get drunk as soon as possible (but not drive!) and perhaps even urinate in public for emphasis! Okay, sort of kidding but not really.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 17 (view)
 
Army Recruiters Get Desperate
Posted: 3/19/2006 9:47:23 AM
Folks

The vast majority of recruiters and their commanders are honest people, whose job is to find suitable recruits and convince them to join up, not always as easy job and always more difficult in times of conflict. The 'turds in the punchbowl' like the one in question here are the exception to the rule, but unfortunately exist in the military just as in the civilian world.

It is the recruiters job to 'sell' the military, so they're not going to emphasis the negative aspects, something every career has including many which face death daily (cops, firemen, etc). But, as a retired officer, I say outright lying and threats such as that above are absolutely not permitted, and all those who practice them or tolerate those who do need to be discliplined.

He needs to be in Iraq riding shotgun on convoys tomorrow, that will stop this bullshit quick.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 81 (view)
 
Creation BY Evolution
Posted: 3/19/2006 9:20:03 AM
Folks

If you take the argument for the incidental creation of Universe/Life and subsequent evolution at it's core, namely that an infinity of possibilities makes such a 'miracle' inevitable, you could also say that the same infinity of possibilities could just as easily include God/ID (or whatever your definition of God is).

The problem is that we humans have trouble grasping the concept of infinity, which closely parallels believers inability to understand the totality of God.

Do I have a point? Yes, neither side can be 'proven' to be correct or incorrect, it comes down to Faith for believers (of all faiths) and best SWAG for the rest of humanity.

MajMike

p.s. SWAG: scientific wild-ass guess

 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 13 (view)
 
Iranian nuke's: Truth or diversion
Posted: 3/10/2006 6:43:27 PM
I see a lot about oil and other issues mentioned in this thread, but let us remember that the crux here is easy: does the mainstream world trust Iran with the capability to produce nuclear weapons?

The issue is not should they have access to nuclear power . . . the issue is that some of their power plants produce enriched uranium . . . a condition not required just for power. A condition easily avoided through proper engineering and cooperation (by Iran, don't hold your breath) with the IEA and UN safety personnel.

Any nation whose leaders (political and religious) encourage violence over caricatures in a newspaper is not a nation I want to have the bomb. Of course, I'm not happy anybody has it.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 7 (view)
 
Wounded
Posted: 1/10/2006 10:07:51 AM
Squeak

First I am sorry this happened to you, you seem like a nice person. If he continues to bother you I'll come to Wisconsin and have a little chat with him, I enjoy taking these sob's to the woodshed and I'm bored down here.

Can I recommend a book? It's called "The Gift of Fear", and it talks about how our senses often warn us of danger and how we can become more sensitive to these warnings. I enjoyed it and learned a lot from it, next time you look for a book consider this one.

Lastly, although wounded, don't get scar tissue on your heart, most guys are not like that.

MajMike

p.s. My divorce was final in late August, I found out about an affair right before that (denied, of course), and she married the sob in mid-October and moved him into my house with my daughter. Point being I understand being wounded, remember you're not alone.
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 26 (view)
 
Index of all of Kreationism MYTHS DEBUNKED!
Posted: 12/21/2005 12:52:42 PM
To me the bottom line is that our understanding of science is changing/expanding so rapidly that to dismiss the possibility of 'intelligent design' (ID) can only be based on anti-religious sentiment. The possibility that a 'Designer' used the Laws of our Universe to create that Universe, including evolution, can no more be disproved than the existence of such a Designer can be proved.

I believe in ID myself, but recognize that the laws of probability in an infinite Universe would allow for the Life we have here on Earth without the attention of a Creator. However, to state unequivically that no such Designer/Creator exists is not possible, unless one uses opinion instead of facts.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 17 (view)
 
How to discuss sex with a virgin . . . ladies help please!
Posted: 12/2/2005 5:05:31 AM
blastkist

The last three years we were married my wife withheld 'marital favors', so I have been celibate for way too long now.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 12 (view)
 
How to discuss sex with a virgin . . . ladies help please!
Posted: 11/30/2005 6:13:29 PM
shescomeudone

We haven't been dating for 8 months, she's been in the States for 8 months but we have been dating only about 2 1/2 months. Her English is pretty good, and I work at making myself understood, but I have no clue how to bring up the subject of oral sex with any woman I haven't even kissed yet.

This is not about pressuring her to do something she is not ready for yet, we are still talking about careers, desires for children, what I expect from a wife (partnership), and most of the other issues that comprise basic compatibility.

I just don't want to wait and get married and find out that she finds oral sex distasteful or sinful, or that it has to be pitch black in the room for her to disrobe, or that sex is a chore or duty. I do understand that we might have to compromise on some things, that's life, but I cannot bear to think about another near-frigid marriage bed. I want my next marriage to be my last, and I don't think I can do that if things are that way.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 1 (view)
 
How to discuss sex with a virgin . . . ladies help please!
Posted: 11/29/2005 8:13:24 PM
Ladies

This sounds improbable, but I have been dating a Chinese lady who just came to the US about 8 months ago, she's 27 and (says) she has never even been kissed properly much less had sex. My understanding of her culture (Chinese/Indonesian) confirms that this is considered 'proper' and intimacy waits until marriage (being human, I'm sure there are exceptions), and her manner certainly bears this out.

Assuming this is true, and seeing as how sexual differences were one problem leading to my divorce (I wanted it and she didn't, and pretty much anything other than the missionary position was 'porno' sex), how do I discuss this topic with this lady?

Now, I consider myself pretty normal sexually. I love the female form and enjoy most of the basic positions as well as giving and receiving (for a change, lol) oral sex. But, how do you discuss these intimate subjects with a woman who has yet to even experience the basics?

I am not wanting to rush her into sex (yes I am a normal horny male), because I really like her and see long-term possibilities, but the prospect of another asexual marriage depresses me so.

Comments . . . advice?

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 52 (view)
 
Divorce finalized = Instant boyfriend for my ex
Posted: 11/13/2005 4:29:16 PM
UPDATE: The **** married him on October 15 and the sob now lives in my house with my daughter. I guess the betrayal is complete.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 3 (view)
 
Bombings in Amman - Help or hurt the insurgency?
Posted: 11/13/2005 4:25:45 PM
epsilonbj

I agree that killing innocents is wrong, but to say it never helped any cause ignores history. I would have said it has never helped a good cause, but unfortunately terror has worked for some before, recently we see how the protracted insurgency in Iraq has hurt America in the international community (and Iraqis on all sides).

Also, the VC used many bombings of political, intellectual and spiritual leaders (of all walks of life) who opposed their cause as well as Americans (bars, hotels, etc). They assassinated anyone of leadership ability who worked against them, it was a favorite tactic and usually included their families as well. They did it the old-fashioned way alright - scorched earth and all who oppose put to the sword.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 1 (view)
 
Bombings in Amman - Help or hurt the insurgency?
Posted: 11/13/2005 1:02:15 PM
I've given a lot of thought to this latest bombing attack, and wonder if (although a tactical success) this will backfire on them in the international community/media and show them for the evil men they really are?

Thoughts?

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 15 (view)
 
My ex has found someone, I'm not handling it well
Posted: 10/1/2005 6:05:19 AM
Soulfishy

I am in the same boat, how about we trade out and eliminate the problems?

Just kidding . . . . . . . . . I'm selfish and want the **stard for myself.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 13 (view)
 
Lynndie England going to prison
Posted: 9/27/2005 10:40:03 AM
Considering the motivational effect on the Muslim fundamentalists/insurgents ALL participants in the Abu Ghraibscandal are guilty of killing many American soldiers and Iraqis from all walks of life. The human consequences of their acts far outweighs the justified outrage the World felt, and (imo) has lead directly to increased casualties from the insurgency.

I recognize that this event did not create the insurgency from a vacuum, but it certainly added gas to the fire. PVT England is one of a cast (and I include her immediate chain of command), and everyone who participated or had (or should have had) knowledge of the events shares the guilt.

MajMike

p.s. On a deeply personal level I say these people (all of them) are a disgrace to the uniform, and should be lined up and shot as traitors for the suffering they caused. How many mothers got metal boxes back instead of their child because of their acts?
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 23 (view)
 
Do we really want/need the Gov't to save us?
Posted: 9/26/2005 7:38:26 AM
This is a double-edged sword folks. I believe people need to do a better job of preparing for the known events that can affect them, but I also think that when a disaster destroys parts of three states that the Fed govt should be there to help.

Could more folks have left NO? Yes. Could those living there have prepared better in the years/weeks/days leading up to Katrina? Absolutely. Should the state and local govt's have been more proactive? Yes again. But the scope of this disaster exceeds the ability of anybody but our Fed govt and military to respond effectively, and to question the need for their involvement in this case is asinine.

I'm all for personal responsibility, and went through Hurricane Andrew while at Homestead AFB as well as several here in Panama City. I stock non-perishables, water, batteries, a radio and CB, medications, etc., in an attempt to be prepared (and of course I am armed), but none of that helps when your home is under 20 feet of water or scattered over a few square miles of your destroyed neighborhood (assuming you survived).

Lastly, as a spiritual person I say help them because they need it. These people are our families, friends and neighbors, and simple decency dictates we do all we can to help them.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 1 (view)
 
500 Abu Ghraib prisoners released - Hope for GTMO?
Posted: 9/26/2005 7:20:28 AM
500 prisoners were released by US and Iraqi officials from Abu Ghraib in a gesture to Sunni's before Ramadan and the coming elections.

What the US needs to do now is release some GTMO prisoners in the same way, this is a great opportunity to bridge some gaps and there must be some folks there who could be released without endangering national security. A tradition in Islam is to pardon some lesser offenders before Ramadan each year (as a demonstration of forgiveness), this presents the US a golden opportunity to heal some wounds by doing the same.

I only hope our govt be astute enough to recognize this and not allow the chance to pass without action.

Thoughts?

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 8 (view)
 
Divorce finalized = Instant boyfriend for my ex
Posted: 9/23/2005 6:45:18 PM
Trapped

I understand your point, but don't really care. It might be worth a few days in county to beat the living sh*t out of him, but I'm hoping by talking about it here I can release some of the anger without it involving traction for him.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 1 (view)
 
Divorce finalized = Instant boyfriend for my ex
Posted: 9/23/2005 3:14:43 PM
My divorce was final one month ago, and the 'friend' (as my ex had assured me) is spending most afternoons at (still) MY house, meeting the family and friends, the whole shebang. The locks were also changed (coincidently) and I don't have a key to my own house (caveat: she is refinancing in her name, thankfully).

We were getting along okay, despite my being against the divorce. Sixteen years of marriage, seventeen and a half together, and a seven yo daughter together. The experiences I went through in the military changed me in so many ways, she just couldn't make the transition from who I was to who I am. I accept much responsibility for the bad times, but wish she could have forgiven me (as I do her) and tried to make it work.

Anyway, I am so hurt and angry at her and Jack(a*s) that I dream about breaking his bones. I would never hurt (nor have I ever wanted to) my ex, but ways to hurt him are never completely out of my mind. To me he is a dishonorable little sh*t who didn't have the balls to be up front about their relationship, and she sullied what we had together by doing the same.

I don't want to kill him, but I believe that would happen should a problem occur, as I am much bigger than him (and trained to kill people). I have stayed away from her (our) house as much as possible, and because I physically ache to get my hands on him.

Pray for me, or send me some good vibes or kharma. I'm going to need it.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 21 (view)
 
Poll at SF Chronicle: Is President Bush to blame for slow federal response to Katrina disaster?
Posted: 9/19/2005 6:22:22 AM
I was on terminal leave from the USAF when 911 happened, and wasn't aware of the tremendous changes made to FEMA in response to that tragedy. Formerly FEMA had a quasi-Cabinet level position within the govt and it's leaders (typically) had some real experience in the disaster response process. After 911 FEMA went under DHS, and the politically appointed leadership has limited or no actual experience in disaster/emergency response.

This to me is the primary cause of the Katrina problems. While not a Clinton fan I felt he hit the nail on the head when he said recently that "in the event of a domestic disaster the head of FEMA becomes the most important person in America". To have that person a) several levels removed from the President, and b) with no real relevant experience, accounts for the communication and leadership deficiencies.

The Patriot Act reminds us that the changes to FEMA aren't the only 'knee-jerk' reactionary mistakes made by our Congress, our President and the Supreme Court (with their abandonment of a US citizen to the GTMO prison camps AND the imminent domain crap).

It has been an expensive lesson, both in human and monetary terms. We need to make the most of it and get it right the next time, and I think enough folks are upset enough to make sure that happens (including myself).

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 19 (view)
 
High Competition for resources causes social stratification, inequality and violence in society
Posted: 9/18/2005 2:09:11 PM
No doubt that wealth inequities (real or perceived) have sparked much of the violence we have seen this century (and in previous ones), and to take the road less traveled is a good choice. I would submit that 'we' have taken such forks before (our Revolution, the Civil War, extending the right to vote to all races/sexes, the Civil Rights movement, EEO, etc, etc, etc), and we should remember that our path today is but one more step in a long line of footprints.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 17 (view)
 
High Competition for resources causes social stratification, inequality and violence in society
Posted: 9/18/2005 6:17:41 AM
I think we are basically in agreement on this, but I wanted to mention one more thing. How much of human progress has been sparked by the competition for scarce resources?

Medical, technological, societal, etc., all areas with advances due to conflict, war, and other competitive actions. If there was less competition would we be as advanced as a species as we are today?

Plus we need to remember that capital is required for growth, if the wealth of the past had been redistributed more equally would there have been the investment dollars available to finance the progress of the last century or two?

I guess my point is that we need to view this question carefully and consider both sides of the coin (not just who has the money but how is it being used).

MajMike

 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 15 (view)
 
High Competition for resources causes social stratification, inequality and violence in society
Posted: 9/17/2005 5:26:35 PM
I agree that we can learn from most societies, especially those who have found better ways to include all of the people in the progress of the nation. But violence and tough competition is everywhere, to change such methods will require a sea change of attitudes at all levels of society, from the wealthy seeing how helping the poor helps themselves to the poor daring to believe that things can really change.

Compared to 2/3 of this Earth's nations the West has done well in serving the needs of all the people (although problems still linger obviously), if we can take it a step (or three) further then maybe we can truly achieve a country where all wo/men are equal in truth and not just theory.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 13 (view)
 
High Competition for resources causes social stratification, inequality and violence in society
Posted: 9/17/2005 5:47:42 AM
It seems that we are forgetting that domination by the upper class (i.e. aristocrats) has been the norm for many centuries, and was brought to America by the immigrants who came from their various lands.

If any of you think this problem is limited to the US you are sadly mistaken, some countries may conceal it better, but the same folks own the resources as did when this nation was founded. The problem is global, and must addressed as such to have any hope of change.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 18 (view)
 
Poll at SF Chronicle: Is President Bush to blame for slow federal response to Katrina disaster?
Posted: 9/15/2005 2:43:26 PM
No matter who is ultimately responsible, I vehemently agree with those who want a VERY thorough look into the problems evident to all in the debacle called Katrina.

BUT, there also needs to be emphasis put on people being better informed and prepared, and taking responsibility for themselves. Many of those in the area affected perhaps could not evacuate due to various reasons, but there are also many there who just chose not to leave. Maybe the memory of Katrina will raise awareness of personal responsibility as well.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 47 (view)
 
Just wondering where were you on Sept.11th
Posted: 9/13/2005 6:42:48 PM
I was on terminal leave from the USAF, and visiting my parents in Mississippi. We caught the broadcast as it began, and saw much of it live. It was sort of like the Challenger accident (I saw that too), too foreign to be real, your mind couldn't wrap itself around the new reality yet.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 68 (view)
 
Explain to me Christians, About The Devil!
Posted: 9/13/2005 6:36:37 PM
Bushido: "Life in every breath"


It is people who constitute both the givers/servants/protectors in life and their polar opposites. The good and bad experienced in mortal life both come from within man, people acting as instruments for good or evil thus showing both God and the Devil as being within us all.

This then leads one to consider yin/yang, the duality of gender (male and female in all things), and many other religious parallels from around the world.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 2 (view)
 
Why is Canadian Currency worth LESS?
Posted: 9/10/2005 12:21:28 PM
Simple, the demand for US dollars is greater, probably because our money is the basis or peg for so many other currencies. It does seem a little weird though, with our economies tied so closely together I wouldn't expect a 15% difference in the currencies, I can only guess investors see the US dollar as a better hedge against inflation.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 112 (view)
 
Should Flooded New Orleans ever be rebuilt,...where it is?
Posted: 9/8/2005 6:11:50 AM
Burn the devastated buildings to the ground, build up the ground level with fill dirt and only then allow rebuilding. Fix the problems which led to this disaster before rebuilding.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 58 (view)
 
Explain to me Christians, About The Devil!
Posted: 9/6/2005 1:59:36 PM
Just a comment: No one can ""redeem" themselves (in Christianity), only the Savior (also called the Redeemer) can do that. Now, as to Lucifer being forgiven, I think for us to assume we understand the entirety (or even much) about an Unknowable Mystery is foolish. I also believe that it is unlikely given his greatest of sins, but God is also merciful, and the Atonement is all-encompassing (imo) and may even apply to the fallen ones. It is beyond my understanding to I am hesitant to say with any surety.

kce33

I believe that a good person can find much of value in the Scriptures regardless of his/her actual religion. I do however agree that with greater faith comes greater understanding, and as this occurs we see deeper and deeper meanings to the same verses. In Christianity we attribute this to the Holy Spirit growing within us (hopefully), others attribute it to inner peace, life experiences, etc. Whatever one calls it, it does (imo) help us to see further into God's words and find that which we need to help us live happily.

It's funny, but Islam features a component of this more than we do and I think they have the right idea. The very word Islam means 'surrender', as in surrendering to God's will and doing what He has taught. This to me is a good description of real faith, belief that makes us strong enough to admit our weakness and surrender to God's plan for us.

MajMike
 MajMikeW
Joined: 10/9/2004
Msg: 84 (view)
 
.. and Nero played his violin while Rome burned.....
Posted: 9/6/2005 1:51:03 PM
nitanylion

I've been around my folks a lot lately and that is one of my Dad's sayings, he got it from his Dad, and so forth. Southern (and country, us anyway) folks have their own metaphors, as you well know. After a while no one really knows where it came from, but one can think of some disgusting possibilities, can't one?

MajMike

p.s. Have you ever been cow tipping or snipe hunting?
 
Show ALL Forums