online dating service
REGISTER | MAIL/PROFILE | HELP | NOW ONLINE | SEARCH | RATING | FORUMS | SUCCESS STORIES

 

     
Posted In Forum:
Home   login   MyForums  
Show ALL Forums  
 
 Author Thread: Should Flooded New Orleans ever be rebuilt,...where it is?
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 147 (view)
 
Should Flooded New Orleans ever be rebuilt,...where it is?
Posted: 9/10/2005 9:10:51 PM
I think they should definitely have a port there, oil drilling there. Nothing wrong with that. Let the insurance companies deal with how they're going to insure businesses at the port, drilling, etc. Don't use the bowl except for business. If something is going to drown again, let it be the businesses of the rich. They can afford it.

But RESIDENCES? Entire cities/parishes/neighborhoods? Nope. Make that a while away from the dangerous area of the port. Transfer all the Napoleonic style buildings and homes of N.O. to 50 miles away. Make it safe for everyone. It will still have that awesome Mardi Gras, the gay parade, the mysterious cemeteries, etc.



When my ex-boyfriend was studying at Tulane Medical School, I remember N.O. being a very fun but excessively humid place. I was always almost on the verge of passing out from the intense humidity. I think it's because of the marshes near N.O. or something. N.O. was built where nothing is supposed to be built. It's like areas of Miami, FL., which are built upon Everglades marshland, where there is nothing but muck under. These areas are not supposed to be built upon. They spell really bad news.

Unfortunately, they will build N.O. again in the same spot, and, until the next time, when there will be hell to pay again when a very bad storm comes along due to global warming.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 144 (view)
 
Should Flooded New Orleans ever be rebuilt,...where it is?
Posted: 9/10/2005 8:17:57 PM
I know I'm goign to take some ribbing over this but I think they shoud rebuild NOLA someplace upstream that has higher elevation. The ancient Egptians did it with the temple of Abu Simbel, and that temple is pretty big, so such a thing is possible.



Makes perfect sense to me.

I say every residence and business on the edge of ocean should NOT be insured.

In addition to making cities be built in safer areas, that would clear beaches real quick and make it possible for the rest of us to see the ocean when there are no hurricanes blowing.

 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 105 (view)
 
Bush to lead investigation into hurricane debacle
Posted: 9/9/2005 8:39:49 PM
You have to see that it's kind of like getting Osama bin Laden to investigate 9/11, or Nixon to investigate Watergate. He's an interested party.


It's the Mafia investigating itself and its own crimes.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 117 (view)
 
Should Flooded New Orleans ever be rebuilt,...where it is?
Posted: 9/8/2005 6:10:21 PM
Am I paranoid or did it seem like the Feds really wanted people out of there for good..?


The Republican administration wanted people out of there so they would not photograph the estimated 40,000-plus dead. It might cause a riot, who knows. Funny, how the water did not "become" so infectious and dangerous that Marshall Law was declared and people evacuated, until the levels of water were dropping enough to walk around comfortably. No sooner was Marshall Law declared than they announced they were going to prohibit the photographing of the dead. Some photos have gotten out. Even 1 photo is terrifying. 40,000 bodies tho? Definitely it would cause riots. I pray people publish photos. However, they'll go to jail, as FEMA has banned them.

In any case, it wasn't to search for oil that they suddenly declared the water too dangerous, where they hadn't before.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 82 (view)
 
Bush to lead investigation into hurricane debacle
Posted: 9/8/2005 5:55:06 PM
***sigh*** okay...let's review this one more time:

Leadership comes from the TOP.


Not according to Republicans. They believe it doesn't always work that way. Republican rules work like this:

1) If it's a Republican leader that f*cked up, somebody else is to blame. If the leader is anything else but Republican, he has only himself to blame;

2) If it's a Republican leader that is braindead, you're being mean-spirited, unpatriotic, and a liar to say he's dumb. If the leader is anything else but Republican, he's a failure, dangerous to the entire nation, and amoral;

3) If a Republican is an adulterer, Jesus forgives and nobody's perfect. If it's anybody else that's an adulterer, he's amoral and anti-Jesus.

I can go on endlessly. Wolves in sheep's clothing doesn't begin to describe it.

The other day I heard someone talk about FOX News, then about foxes. They were describing the Repugnican control of this nation as foxes in the henhouse, with the foxes claiming to be the victims.

Bush's administration will now "conduct" the investigation to see whom they can blame for their murder of 40,000-plus innocent sub-poverty people. The foxes in the henhouse, pretending to be innocent or wrongdoing.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 69 (view)
 
Bush to lead investigation into hurricane debacle
Posted: 9/7/2005 6:54:36 PM
For George Bush to lead an investigation into the 40,000-plus deaths in New Orleans, is equivalent to a murderer being allowed to run the investigation into who killed the person he is accused of murdering.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 59 (view)
 
Bush nominates Roberts for Chief Justice
Posted: 9/7/2005 5:32:49 PM

Reagan was seen as one of the greatest presidents we ever had. Not that I agree with EVERYTHING he ever did, and I was too young to know much about him. But in a simple websearch, what I found wasn't "right-wing fundamentalist".


oi vei.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 46 (view)
 
Bush nominates Roberts for Chief Justice
Posted: 9/6/2005 9:01:38 PM
What? Stop accusing me of being Roberts. If I had to be a piece of crap like that, I'd probably kill myself.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 44 (view)
 
Bush nominates Roberts for Chief Justice
Posted: 9/6/2005 8:52:13 PM

Roberts is going to be appointed.


Another Nazi to make you delighted.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 88 (view)
 
.. and Nero played his violin while Rome burned.....
Posted: 9/6/2005 8:48:06 PM
The WBRZ people said it was confirmed that Blanco did indeed ask for 24 hours.


There was a typhoon in Japan. I watched some scenes on TV. The federal govt. there, evacuated and/or rescued all people except for like, 4?

What happens in the U.S. when there's an emergency? Oh easy...

1) First, the president is on vacation, resting up his lazy ass for the 5th week (despite having taken many other vacation weeks already during the year) and not about to give that up;

2) His butt-buddy, Brown, a useless, rich horse trainer whom he named as head of our federal emergency catastrophe services, FEMA, admitted (to our horror) that he hadn't even heard about the monster-catastrophe going on in N.O. until 4 days after it had occurred, despite the fact that the rest of the nation had been watching it on TV for 4 days, and had watched it head that way for several days. So he did shit. And what he did do, he did so ineptly, it created even worse situations. How in hell does that happen? This man should be in jail as we speak.

As I said before, we are SO totally screwed in this country. We either have clowns and imbeciles for leaders, or they're just plain satanic, and the Satan-fans carrying Teflon are hell-bent on defending them, even if it kills them too. God help us all if we have another catastrophe, and there are Republicans in the White House, and infesting the rest of the govt.

Right now they are guessing the dead count will go above 40,000 and the rest of the world is in gaping-mouth shock at the horror and seeming genocide. And folks, it IS genocide. This would be another story if these people were white.


'Katrina' and America's Race Problems

The horror in New Orleans has exposed the United State's dirty secrets of race and poverty. Coverage of the disaster, argues American journalist Joan Walsh, at times portrays New Orleans' African-Americans as victims and at others as barbarians. Americans are ready to help their poorer neighbors, she says, but is the country ready to take up a national debate about racial inequity and poverty?

The nightmare in New Orleans has a lot to tell us about poverty: the desperate poverty of the city's African-American population, of course, but also the poverty of political debate in the U.S. today. The crisis unfolding before us -- dispossession, looting, people shooting at rescue workers, the president's dim response, and now, people dying in front of our eyes outside the Superdome -- rubs our noses in so much that's wrong in our country, it's excruciating to watch. But I'm especially struck by the inability of our existing political discourse to describe, let alone to solve, the intractable social problems that have come together in this flood whose proportions and portents seem almost biblical.

Ever since the first looting photos made cable news I've felt sick, like here we go again, we're going to have a new round in the culture war about the poor. Are they victims, or barbarians? If Sean Hannity's attacking them, well, I sure as hell have to defend them. When right-wing blogger Boortz is saying shoot them on sight, somebody has to say that's sick and crazy, right? Personally, with all the destruction in view on Tuesday and Wednesday, I couldn't be horrified by people stealing food; I didn't even care much about people running off with sneakers and beer and TVs. Looting Wal-Mart? I don't defend it, but what do we expect? These are desperately poor people who've been deliberately left behind, in so many senses of the word -- left behind by society, shut up in housing projects and hideous poverty, and now truly left behind by local and federal officials who failed to come up with an evacuation plan for people too poor and isolated to leave on their own. If looting Wal-Mart was the worst of it, I thought, we should consider ourselves lucky.

But it wasn't. Thursday we saw people shooting at rescue helicopters (with guns they stole from Wal-Mart, perhaps?), at hospital supply trucks, at workers trying to evacuate the sick from hospitals, the horrifying next chapter in an already awful story. I started to feel like my indifference to yesterday's looting was morally lazy, a reflexive shrug at having to really think about the poor, who they are, why they are. What a crazy, depraved way to treat people who are trying to help. But having said that, we're not absolved from trying to understand and reckon with the chaos. Like it or not, this crisis is going to be with us for a long time, because it's been coming for a long time -- we're going to have to face issues of race, poverty and civil rights we've long chosen to ignore.

As I watched buses make their way from the Superdome to the Astrodome in Houston, in a surreal and perverse echo of the Freedom Rides of the '60s, a few thoughts were inescapable. Why didn't we send a caravan of buses into the city's poorest neighborhoods on Saturday or Sunday, when the dimensions of the disaster were already predictable? And what is really going to happen in Houston? These are dispossessed people who've been further dispossessed -- do we have a word for that? After a few days, the Superdome is already a slice of hell, with overflowing bathrooms, fights, rape allegations and now, people dying outside. Do we expect the Astrodome -- abandoned by the Houston Astros in 2000 for Enron Field, excuse me, Minute Maid Park -- to fare much better? Sure, Houston's got electricity and running water, but tens of thousands of scared, angry people packed into an abandoned sports stadium -- we couldn't come up with a better symbol of how little we care about the poor, how little we've thought about what to do with them, for them, if we tried.

As if to make sure we didn't miss the ironies, the same week as Katrina came news that the poverty rate has climbed again, the fourth straight year under President Bush. But let's be fair: John Kerry barely mentioned the poor last year. And while President Clinton's booming 1990s lifted some boats, and his welfare reform at least muted the ideological sniping about whether poor folks were victims or freeloaders, nobody's bothered lately to pay much attention to whether welfare reform made people's lives better, whether it paved a path out of poverty or just moved its subjects into the vast ranks of the working poor.

Then came Katrina, and we're forced to pay attention. We're forced to look at New Orleans, to really see it -- one of the nation's great party cities and also one of its poorest. If you go for Mardi Gras or the annual Jazz Heritage Festival, really if you go any old time, you know its majority black population is mostly hidden from white tourists. Beyond the gorgeous French Quarter and Garden District it's long been a crime-plagued, gang-ridden, corruption-befouled city. But as long as you stuck to Fodor's, you didn't have to care.

Now you do. Before Katrina, we were warned of coffins floating out of cemeteries, but instead we got poor black people flushed out of slums, and to some people they're apparently just as scary. But they're not going back any time soon. They're our responsibility now. They always were; we just ignored it.

Maybe we can't anymore. On cable news, our normally buttoned-down blow-dried correspondents, almost all of them white, are cracking under the strain of bearing witness to the suffering and even death of the people who weren't looting, who did the right thing and headed to the Superdome, only to find a worse hell awaited them. They've dropped their script and they're asking tough questions. CNN's Chris Lawrence was clearly shaken describing what he saw: "We talked to mothers holding babies, some of these babies 3, 4, 5 months old, living in these horrible conditions ...These people are being forced to live like animals. When you look at some of these mothers your heart just breaks ... People need to see this ... what it's really like here. We saw dead bodies. People are dying at the convention center, and there's no one to come get them."

Later, Anderson Cooper was even harsher, challenging Sen. Mary Landrieu for thanking President Bush for his efforts to aid her state. "Senator, I'm sorry for interrupting," he said. "For the last four days I've been seeing dead bodies in the streets here in Mississippi ... You know, I gotta tell you, there are a lot of people here who are very upset, and very angry, and very frustrated. And when they hear politicians thanking one another, it kind of cuts them them wrong way right now. Because literally there was a body on the streets of this town yesterday being eaten by rats because this woman had been laying in the street for 48 hours and there's not enough facilities to take her up. Do you get the anger that is out here?"

Of course, it's unfair to blame the president for an act of nature like Katrina. And yet it's irrefutable that this administration's backward policies and politics made this disaster worse than it had to be, and its belated response will do nothing to address the problems that have suddenly been flushed out into the open. The death toll from Katrina is likely to be higher than 9/11, but most of its victims will be black and poor, and I doubt we'll wage a war on poverty and neglect to match the war on terror launched after al-Qaida struck -- and if we did, I doubt it would be any more effective. The president, who continued his vacation while Katrina raged, just the way he kept reading "My Pet Goat" on 9/11, is headed for the Gulf on Friday. I'd like him to bring some answers, but I don't expect him to.

What I'd really like is to see him head today for the Superdome, bring his dad, and Bill Clinton, and John Kerry and Howard Dean -- any Democrat or Republican who cares, really -- and go to work, feeding and comforting the refugees and finding out what they need. Then I'd like to see them put people to work, rebuilding the amazing historic city we've apparently lost.

Americans are ready to do the right thing. Americans want to help their neighbors -- even when those neighbors are people they don't know, who are poor and have different colored skin. If you close your eyes, you can imagine a silver lining. Inspired by a president who got down in the water himself and started bailing, America could find the will and the resources to put people to work building a country, not destroying one the way we're doing in Iraq. But that is just a dream. In the real world, the water is likely to keep rising. Still, I'd be thrilled to be proven wrong.

Joan Walsh is Salon's editor in chief.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 24 (view)
 
Bush nominates Roberts for Chief Justice
Posted: 9/5/2005 10:03:07 PM
I understand your opinion, but you didn’t answer my questions, what countries have more privacy rights than we do?


Let's start, for example, with ALL the countries of the European Union. Is that too little for you?


What part of your sex life can be investigated exactly?


I already told you. Scroll up. If you have specific questions, fire away.


You must truly and emphatically be out of touch that you would have to ask me about what Christian Charities give to the poor, most charity assistance you see in the US comes form Faith Based originations not only do they help the poor here, they help the poor all over the world. That has to be the dumbest question I’ve seen on this site.


Pardon? Where did I ask you WHAT Christian charities give to the poor? I asked you to provide me with factual data, statistics, showing what percentage of money the poor receive, comes from Christians.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 74 (view)
 
Billions and our military in Iraq, but no help for New Orleans
Posted: 9/5/2005 9:59:11 PM

Was he running the country from that stage in Cali? Guess there was a sat phone in the body of that guitar keeping him up to date on the events in NOLA huh? I heard he played his favorite song that day a tune called "My Pet Goat"





Gawd. I shouldn't even laugh... having Bush at the head of this country is like having a mental retard with his hands on the controls of missiles.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 80 (view)
 
.. and Nero played his violin while Rome burned.....
Posted: 9/5/2005 9:54:36 PM
Mike, I'm not attacking you personally. I've seen how you are truly concerned over everything that's happening in New Orleans. However, though a tragedy could not have been averted, if help had arrived on Monday night, it would not have reached the caliber we are currently watching unfolding day by day. Every day is a new horror. TV Azteca is recounting the horrors resulting from not providing *any* help whatsoever for days.

The fact is, that our president is inept. There is no question about this anymore. Even Republicans are saying so now, which took me by complete surprise, as I never thought I'd hear anything like that from Republicans. This is not the first time he's failed this nation. He has no interest in anything, knows nothing, feels nothing.

I'll be watching and waiting to see what comes of this. If the people of this nation have any brain cells left at all, they will make sure they never, ever make the mistake of putting a selfish, conscienceless, low I.Q., greedy, evil individual like Bush at the helm of this nation.


The point on this should have been the Governor, and through her FEMA and DHS, and they all share in the blame for the delayed and discordant response (imo).


You keep repeating this non-sensical statement. The governor of the State of Louisiana asked for help till she was blue in the face. Do you want me to start throwing links in here on that? Your president once again failed the nation, this time causing thousands of deaths.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 157 (view)
 
National Health Care? Is it for the USA?
Posted: 9/5/2005 9:46:00 PM
The Bible says that the idler shall not eat the worker's bread; Veterans Hospitals are for those who served in the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, or Coast Guard.


Holy moly, Legal Wizard! Are you a MORMON? You just pulled that quote from a Mormon book called, Doctrine and Covenants:


“The idler shall not have place in the church, except he repent and mend his ways” (D&C 75:29). He also commanded, “Thou shalt not be idle; for he that is idle shall not eat the bread nor wear the garments of the laborer” (D&C 42:42).


If you are Mormon, that would explain a great deal about what you stand for, and now I understand your punitive nature.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 72 (view)
 
Billions and our military in Iraq, but no help for New Orleans
Posted: 9/5/2005 9:32:20 PM
For all those who wanted a blurb of Imlistening's article by Walter Block, so they could avoid having to read it, here it is:


To conclude, here is what I see as the libertarian position on the storm


For anyone who has no idea what Libertarianism is all about, just look up, "Ayn Rand." If you're too lazy to do so, let me tell you who she was. Ayn Rand was a Jewish Russian with a serious mental problem which probably included nymphomania (her bio makes her seem like a porn starlet). But I digress. She wrote several books, all of which are guaranteed to put you to sleep. The essence of all of these books was her philosophy of life, which is best summed up as follows: "I got mine, you got none, f*ck you, a**hole-loser!"

I tried getting through The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged, but it turned out these became kickass sleeping pills instead, and later they became coasters (albeit tall ones, as she was entirely too prolific and without cause to be). In any case, I simply couldn't get past about 50 pages of either book, before I was off into deep slumber, like a baby after feeding. However, as a result of the series of incredibly boring books Rand wrote, she developed a fan club of folks (practically all of them male) who worshipped the "f*ck you a**hole-losers" ideology. They call themselves, "Libertarians."

Now, it is my understanding (from what someone Canadian has explained to me), that American Libertarians are the Ayn Rand-obsessed ones, while Canadian Libertarians stand for something altogether different. I couldn't swear to this, but I'm mentioning it, before anyone takes issue with me on this.

Oh yes, and before I forget, Ayn Rand liked committing adultery with the husbands of her female friends, tho, to be perfectly honest, Rand was rather a homely woman and nothing to write home about, but hey, I guess some men just got very aroused with her philosophy. They still do. Must be some sort of aphrodisiac?
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 19 (view)
 
Bush nominates Roberts for Chief Justice
Posted: 9/5/2005 7:19:20 PM
Yep. Christians are not all right wing, but Republicans have been getting it on with churches for so long, that it's hard to tell where Republicans end and Christians begin. They're all this fuzzy, ugly, sticky, monstrous thing. Sure, there are libs in there, but they're silent and in shock from being surrounded by freaks.

Yep. There probably aren't any stats on how much $ the Christians actually DO give to the poor in money. It's probably a pittance. However, he should make an effort to find them, since he mentioned them. Right wing Christians have this little gimmick of, "Well, we Christians donate to the poor," as a justification for getting rid of welfare to the poor. Getting rid of welfare to the poor is what has been happening since Reagan on to the present because we haven't managed to get ourselves rid of the right wing cancer in govt. since then. It's part of the reason that in New Orleans 1 out of 4 lived in the kind of sub-poverty that makes one's hair stand on end.

I want to hear just one frikkin' time from a right wing Christian that he's working overtime to get rid of welfare to the rich, but hell, I'll probably die without hearing that. Right wing Christians are there to serve the rich. As they say, "You gotta serve somebody...."
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 17 (view)
 
Bush nominates Roberts for Chief Justice
Posted: 9/5/2005 6:42:04 PM
You must have missed the part where I said the Democrats know him very well too, that was part of the point I was making. As a Chief Justice or any Justice they are there to interpret the law and follow the constitution not their political aspirations or agenda’s, I know that’s important to liberals to get their side in, but even their side is supposed to defend the constitution. What countries have more privacy rights than we do?

What part of your sex life can be investigated exactly? As much as people criticize Christians, its Christians and faith base organizations that the country comes to depend on particularly what we are going through with Katrina.


Democrats know him well for sure. They know he's a religious whacko. Democrats these days have been overcome and overwhelmed by the marketing Republicans have been engaging in since before Reagan. I fear that if they don't stand up to Republicans soon, there will be a revolution here. And, hey, I'm all for that. When there's injustice and the helpless are being stepped on, there's nothing wrong with a good, solid revolution. The French Revolution comes to mind. Lovely thing, in my view.

Ways in which Christian wingnuts fight hard to deny Americans privacy? Let me give you a few Christian targets: Sodomy. Abortion, doing whatever the hell I want with my body parts, like my uterus. Growing any plants I feel like in my backyard and doing with them what I want. Having my child attend public school without having to learn Christian prayers in his home room, and Christian mythology in science class.

As for depending on American Christians for donations:

How much of the money that goes to the poor do Christians give? I know they give 10% to their preacher so he can live nicely, but give me some stats on how well the American Christians are supporting the poor.

As for Katrina, I don't know how much Christians are giving, but I'm seeing about 60 other nations giving huge amts of money to the U.S., including those which the U.S. held out its hand to asking for charity. What a disgrace that we had to hold out our hand and beg for money to help our own people, after spending BILLIONS in Iraq. This country is a complete disgrace every time Republicans are in Congress, the White House, or both.

Do me a favor, send me some stats on how much of what the poor get in charity comes from Christians. I'm really really curious. If I had to guess, I'd bet it's not even 5%.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 13 (view)
 
Bush nominates Roberts for Chief Justice
Posted: 9/5/2005 5:59:38 PM

You mean you don’t know Roberts isn’t a mystery man that applied for the Job. The President is the one who appoints Justices. It’s a concern for Liberals, but he’s a very well known judge by the President and Congress, not to mention people in law.


Actually, Buz, he's just another religious whacko, so you're probably right about Bush knowing him well. There's a great deal that concerns about this man, not the least of which is that he does not honor the American right of privacy. Most advanced nations have far more privacy rights than we do. But of course, we're stuck with the Bible-banging whackos.

As I ran the treadmill today, I watched CNN about Roberts, and thought to myself, "America the Beautiful, where my sex life can be investigated and legislated, where my uterus might well be legislated upon, and where my kids might be forced to adopt Christian prayer in schools." Aren't we lucky.

However, what really concerned me about this freak from the start, is that he trained other would-be justices for the process of questioning before the Congress, explaining to them what they should not divulge, etc. Anyone who is that good at keeping things hidden, is someone I definitely don't want for my country.

However, we're stuck with the right wing Bible-banging whacko now, aren't we? You must be too happy.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 60 (view)
 
Billions and our military in Iraq, but no help for New Orleans
Posted: 9/5/2005 5:39:33 PM
The president is the LEADER.

Lead
v. led, (ld) lead·ing, leads

To show the way to by going in advance
To act as commander, director, or guide
To go first as a guide
To guide or direct in a course
To serve as a route for; take
To go or be at the head of
To be foremost in
To begin or open with
To guide
The first or foremost position.
One occupying such a position; a leader
Command; leadership

American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company

This one has failed, miserably, in a way that is either criminal or borders or genocide. Drop the Teflon.


Perhaps a looser schedule for people who don’t know the system, the President is entitled by law to take vacation.


But not to BE on vacation constantly. This one has taken more vacations than any other president in the history of the United States. The amount of vacation has become a joke, though I don't find it amusing at all.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 55 (view)
 
Billions and our military in Iraq, but no help for New Orleans
Posted: 9/5/2005 5:30:01 PM
Oh! So Bush didn't order war. It was ordered before he could do anything, and now he's just the project manager, and not the boss. Same with the Katrina fiasco. Now I think I understand.

Think I smell Teflon around here....
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 423 (view)
 
Pat Robertson - A christian bloodlust for murder?
Posted: 9/5/2005 5:26:07 PM
All I get from those who know better is obfuscation wjhen the facts and the law are not on their side, and from the rest of the libs all I get is twisted words to mean what they want them to mean, so they post smokescreens.


Are you saying you've being victimized by everyone? I have a suggestion or two:

1) Get a new photo;
2) Lose the Black's Law Dictionary;
3) Tell your mother to stop interrupting you when you're typing out your thoughts on here, so you can manufacture more cohesive ideas.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 53 (view)
 
Billions and our military in Iraq, but no help for New Orleans
Posted: 9/5/2005 5:12:50 PM
Buz, a CEO is the leader of a corporation. HE, and only HE is ultimately responsible when things go wrong. When things go wrong for a corporation, he goes to work and LEADS the corporation to success, which is why when corporations are in trouble, they hire successful CEOs, to LEAD. When there is an emergency, such as a strike, the CEO doesn't go on vacation and says, "Well, the department of finance is in charge of that." He STAYS UP ALL NIGHT TO FIGURE OUT WHAT TO DO.

Please stop defending Bush. Yes, I know, you need to apply Teflon to him. It's sort of a compulsion, a need. However, I will not allow you to select Bush as the only president that is not responsible for emergencies and failures which he failed to lead properly, much as you may want to find him guiltless as a little lamb.

Next thing you know, the defenders of Bush will be saying he's only there as a figurehead to make us feel "warm and cozy."

Please... spare me. Leave the TEFLON at HOME!
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 50 (view)
 
Billions and our military in Iraq, but no help for New Orleans
Posted: 9/5/2005 4:54:04 PM

The President himself doesn’t do these jobs, this is why he has various people in these positions. He depends on this people to do their jobs, when these people don’t do their jobs it’s not the Presidents fault. This should be common sense.


I see. He cannot order a rescue to begin and how fast, and which agencies, but he can order a war to start, how much of it, where, when, how, etc.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 416 (view)
 
Pat Robertson - A christian bloodlust for murder?
Posted: 9/5/2005 4:51:03 PM
You can't. BUT, while I do maintain that it is important not to stop "speaking up," I do not at all apply that to PoF.


I am, in real life, the same as I am on POF. While it's true that POF is more of an organized group of people, and a more constricted environment (threads, rules, etc.), and that in real life there are no threads titled, "Bush is inept", for example, so the opportunities for discussion might not come daily or even every half hour, every chance I get in real life, I am as direct about what's happening in the U.S., as I am on here... up-front and holding nothing back.

I think being direct is important, whether in real life or in a forum with subject threads on different topics.

But yes, real life doesn't exactly have threads on subjects where you can post.

(You can join groups of like-minded people to get things done tho)
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 46 (view)
 
Billions and our military in Iraq, but no help for New Orleans
Posted: 9/5/2005 4:42:53 PM

What's the use in having a mayor and a govorner


You need to keep up. The mayor and governor used all their resources. They had no more left to give. They asked for help and your beloved idiot in the White House took 5 days to lead get FEMA or anyone else to do anything.

Ah but yes, he was on vacation until the day after the hurricane hit. A president *must* take as much vacation as humanly possible.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 45 (view)
 
Billions and our military in Iraq, but no help for New Orleans
Posted: 9/5/2005 4:39:40 PM
I fail to understand how one man (the president) can be blamed for this disaster. There are many levels of government, and it appears that they did nothing either, no plan, no action afterward.
the presidency has already stated that the results are unacceptable and are doing everything they can.


So basically the role of the president is to take responsibility for...... nothing. Everyone else is to blame. He's just immune. Lookin' purty. Like the queen of England. Collecting a salary for nothing. Presidents are supposed to be leaders. They're supposed to LEAD. They're not supposed to spend their time on vacation, scratching their ass, smirking, doing nothing and blaming everyone else when things go wrong.

I don't buy it. Sell it elsewhere.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 78 (view)
 
.. and Nero played his violin while Rome burned.....
Posted: 9/5/2005 4:28:44 PM
It must be nice to be so sure of oneself, especially about a process with which you have no familiarity (the CONUS Emergency Management Process). Before the Federal govt responds to a disaster like this the respective Governor must request it, which if you have followed this story closely you will have noticed she delayed that for several days. Even if they wanted to respond they are not the experts on NO or the surrounding area, most of those folks are casualties or are just overwhelmed.


I’m not so sure of myself. That’s why I would never run for president. Only people who are brilliant and capable of leading should run for president. I'm not a born leader, and I'm not a genius. People who are inept, incapable or mentally feeble should not run for president, and should not be voted for. This nation did, however.

Further, I don’t care if it’s called CONUS or GET-YOUR-ASS-BACK-TO-WORK-IDIOT. If the president of the U.S. is still on vacation the day before a MAJOR warned catastrophe hits, he needs his ass kicked out of the Oval Office so fast, his eyeballs spin and fly out of his head

No, emergency does not mean, “Let’s have a series of meetings over five days to see what we might come up with.” It does not mean, “Let’s call the Secret Service and get them to order in food from The Peking Duck, and I want duck and lobster.” It does not mean, “I’m tired and going to bed. Shall we continue this meeting tomorrow?” while people are drowning. It means Emergency NOW. You don’t SLEEP, you don’t EAT, you don’t even SH*T, if hundreds of thousands of citizens in the U.S. have been attacked by a catastrophe and they’re on the verge of DEATH. It means you stay up on Thursday before the catastrophe hits, and begin ordering FEMA, ordering the National Guard, and ordering everyone’s mother to get food, water and help of every imaginable kind from whereever you have to to get ready NOW, not 4 or 5 days later.

But that’s not what happened is it? This is what happened while people were drowning:


They've had press conferences. I'm sick of the press conferences. For God's sakes, shut up and send us somebody." - Aaron Broussard Jefferson Parish president pleads for help on NBC's 'Meet the Press' Sunday.


And this is what happened while people were drowning:


"We wanted soldiers, helicopters, food and water," said Denise Bottcher, press secretary for Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco of Louisiana. "They wanted to negotiate an organizational chart."


And this is what happened while people were drowning:


"If one person criticizes them, or says one more thing, including the president of the United States, he will hear from me. One more word about it... and I -- I might likely have to punch him."
-- Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., on ABC's 'This Week' defends sheriff's department.


And this is also what happened while people were drowning:


"Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job."
-- President Bush praises Brown during visit to Alabama Friday



The storm hit Monday. The help came 4 days later, on Friday AFTERNOON. And THIS is the plan Homeland Security has to help us in case of catastrophe? God almighty, we’re screwed.

FEMA is crap. Brown is crap. He’s a liar, to begin with, claiming on Thurday, that he only heard about the bad conditions in New Orleans that very day, on TV. I’d been hearing about it since Monday nite on Miami local TV stations, and I don’t have the ear of dumbass Bush, and I’m not privy to inside information on what’s really going on.


Now, before you dismiss my comments, I was in Homestead for Hurricane Andrew and several weeks afterwards (lost almost everything and damn near died). I was here in Panama City for Opal and Ivan, and assisted the military response to several Caribbean nations after hurricanes. My military specialty was medical disaster and contingency planning, and I am a Certified Emergency Manager in the IAEM. I have worked in the arena at all levels, local, state, regional and national (military and civilian), and even coordinated humanitarian trips to several African nations.


Fine. And? I’m waiting for you to tell me how this changes the course of events which allowed thousands to die drowned, infected, dehydrated, in the United States of America, and apparently more will die from this. Are you telling me that a 5 day turn-around is what Americans can expect to get ANY help if catastrophes hit????? Is that what you’re basically saying? Not even 1 bottle of water thrown to anyone till the 5th day?


I understand the process and I am telling you this exceeded even our wildest estimates.


Then let me tell you, if the fastest that FEMA or the military can react to a catastrophe in the U.S. is 5 days (MONDAY NITE, TUESDAY, WEDNESDAY, THURSDAY, FRIDAY NITE), then we’re all f*cked, royally f*cked, with idiots and systems of rescue that are completely inept, antiquated, or just are bogged down with American-style corporate bureaucracy of the kind that requires 10,000 meetings and memos. Excuse the verbiage, but I find the words light compared to what has been allowed to happen to thousands of human beings.

And since you’re blaming the rescue services (FEMA, National Guard, etc.), rather than Bush (here we go again with the buck stops anywhere but on Bush), read this joke. If what you are describing is accurate, this joke describes the manner in which the U.S. does things. Stupid is as stupid does:

photos1.blogger.com/blogger/6678/1086/1600/americans.gif

And sorry, I know you’re not to blame for these thousands of deaths, but any hint, albeit remote, of trying to defend the smirking chimp, just makes me livid.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 34 (view)
 
Billions and our military in Iraq, but no help for New Orleans
Posted: 9/5/2005 10:33:41 AM
Tens of thousands dead under their attics, drowned, because no help came Monday nite, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, or even Saturday morning. The rescue folks already said they will not be able to save everyone who is still alive under the attics of apartment buildings and houses; they don't have enough personnel. (I guess they're in Iraq, fighting a war of Bush's invention for his own enrichment and that of his oil pals).

The rescuers who are landing on roofs, are sick emotionally and mentally from what they're seeing. Some don't know how they're going to continue. They break a roof, enter and find cadavers rotting. Where they find people alive, the people are deathly ill. Those who are deathly ill cannot be moved and will be left to die. The ones that are ill and can be moved, are being moved. Since they cannot go to every roof, there are many right now who are still alive but will die.

There are no longer words to describe what Bush has been allowed to happen here.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 407 (view)
 
Pat Robertson - A christian bloodlust for murder?
Posted: 9/5/2005 10:18:19 AM
The legal doctrine of "Respondeat Superior" was posted here in order to confer upon Saddam Hussein, constructive culpabiltiy for the acts of the terrorists holding Iraqi Diplomatic Passports, upon the suggestion by msquared that an accuser would be required to show that Saddam personally directed the terrorists to murder an American Citizen.


Okay, Legal, so you're using the *concept* of respondeat superior as an illustration of what you believe is a "truism" you think ought to apply to Saddam Hussein's behavior. As my friend from Rega used to say, "NU?" (Which means, "AND?")

You still have yet to prove that it's any of our F****** business to be in Iraq. It's particularly heinous that our tax billions and our military should be in Iraq, when such a horrid catastrophe has befallen our people here. We are now in the process of taking welfare handouts from other nations for this catastrophe. This war is unjustified, there was never any reason for it, and the waste of money in this war has resulted in an economic crisis in this country. You can thank your president for this.

Further, the topic of this forum is Pat Robertson: A Christian Bloodlust for Murder?

Oh and do please try to come down to earth soon. Pendanticism is tiresome. Pendanticism and bs? Unbearable.


Truly, it is a scary thing when politics and religion are mixed. I felt as though I was responding to drones, or cult members. There was no point in which I could level with them. So I gave up.


Don't give up. When people stop speaking up, bad things happen.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 65 (view)
 
.. and Nero played his violin while Rome burned.....
Posted: 9/5/2005 9:49:04 AM
why does BUSH not see,.....

that the world is watching,....and they will remember


Marita, I think Bush sees. I think it's possible to have a low I.Q. and be evil, all at the same time. I think that pretty much describes this president.


The deaths in NO from the lengthy evacuation process are sad, and I hope that after-action reviews help us to prevent future recurrences. When an incident of this magnitude occurs (eclipsing any plans/projections/preparations) we unfortunately have to use military type triage, which includes accepting that some will die and using our finite resources to help those who can be helped.


Future recurrences? Are you trying to tell me that this was some mysterious catastrophe that befell New Orleans that is utterly new to the federal govt, so they could do nothing? That the fed. govt. didn’t know what a hurricane was like? That this was a surprise? The federal govt. didn’t know N.O. was a bowl? They had no idea it was surrounded by water? They didn’t know there was a hurricane headed there? That they didn’t realize the money for the levees repair had been misappropriated for Homeland Security? The federal govt. didn’t realize that 1 out of 4 of N.O.’s people lived in sub-poverty and had no car or money to get out of the city? They didn’t know any of these things, but now they do for next time?

There are no excuses.

On Thursday, the day before the hurricane was said to be headed for New Orleans, even in Miami, Florida, local TVs had already declared this would be catastrophic beyond everyone’s wildest imagination. Meanwhile, Bush, who has taken more vacations than any other president in the entire history of U.S. presidents, was on his ranch enjoying himself, and not ordering FEMA to be in N.O. by MONDAY NIGHT. No. He was there riding his horses, having a grand time. A president must enjoy himself, no?

7 days after the entire nation knew this had been a catastrophe of monstrous proportions, Bush’s pal, Brown, the head of FEMA said it was the first time that he heard that New Orleans was seriously in trouble. In my opinion, this is outright criminal behavior.

There is NO excuse.

In Cuba, a very poor country, which has been crippled by a 40-plus year embargo declared by the U.S. and enforced by the U.S. upon other nations with equal economic threats, citizens are far safer because of the care their FEDERAL govt. provides for them. Whenever there is a hurricane, the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT sends every vehicle possible to evacuate the entire area, with a result of less fatalities than in the U.S. The FEDERAL GOVT.in Cuba DOES NOT just say, “Okay, towns, you're on your own, baby!!! Everyone save themselves as best they can!”

That’s exactly what Bush did to New Orleans here in the U.S.

Where was the federal govt. help for New Orleans on Monday nite, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday morning? I’ll tell you where it was. It was in Texas, smirking, and having another vacation, then on Tuesday it was in Washington D.C., again doing absolutely nothing as people drowned. Nero/Bush played his violin....

This hurricane was tragic, but I’ve never seen any other advanced nation (and almost no poor nations!) where 5 days are allowed to pass without the country’s FEDERAL HELP going into action. Nowhere is this seen, but here in the U.S. While our military is stretched beyond capacity on a war of Bush’s invention for the profits of oil companies and his other buddies, thousands of citizens of the U.S. drown without help. While billions of our tax dollars are spent in Iraq on a war of Bush’s invention, the city of New Orleans, where there is a state of emergency of proportions never seen before in the history of the U.S., is now dependant upon the FINANCIAL CHARITY OF OTHER COUNTRIES, like Qatar, the countries of the European Union, and about 60 countries more. This is sick.


It was my undertanding that while NO had some flooding from the hurricane, the area was comparably small in relation to what we saw after the levee broke.


SMALL? Unless we, the residents of the City of Miami in Florida, were having an out-of-body experience, I can guarantee you we were all watching the same local news as helicopters were showing neighborhood after neighborhood of New Orleans completely covered in water on MONDAY NIGHT, people using boats where they could, and many unable to leave their apt. buildings, waving. This was before the levees broke. Note, that this same hurricane, Katrina, as a category ONE had left our Homestead and Cutler Ridge areas in South Florida like Venice. People here in Cutler Ridge and Homestead had to use BOATS to get around. People here in Cutler Ridge and Homestead had NO DRINKING WATER, NO ELECTRICITY, NO PHONE, no anything!!! And this was as a category one, plus Homestead and Cutler Ridge are not shaped like bowls, nor are they surrounded like water, nor are they next to the beach. What in hell did Bush think was going to happen with New Orleans being struck by a category FOUR, a city that is shaped like a bathtub, and surrounded by water that would surge up from Lake Pontchartraine and land inside it? Sure it got worse after the levees broke. After the already-weak levees broke, entire houses disappeared under the water. It wasn’t just a matter of apartment houses covered to the 2nd and 3rd floors. It was now a matter entire buildings covered in water. But there were monster floods BEFORE the levees broke.

Frankly, I’m exhausted. I’m exhausted knowing that over ten thousand have died from dehydration, from having to drink contaminated water, from drowning inside their attics while Nero played his violin. It’s exhausting listening to the defenders of George Bush try to come up with newfangled ways to defend, justify and blame on other people, the way he’s murdered thousands upon thousands in New Orleans. It's exhausting listening to right wingers apply Teflon to Bush, to make him immune from all the wrong decisions he's made. He’s destroyed this country. It’s time to leave it or take drastic measures.

AztecaTelevision said this morning, “May God and history judge George Bush accordingly.” I agree. I will add, may God and history judge Republicans, for they are as responsible for this as Bush is. God willing, it will.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 52 (view)
 
Should Flooded New Orleans ever be rebuilt,...where it is?
Posted: 9/4/2005 8:43:10 PM
How many times do you have to be told that the flooding occurred on Tuesday and not Monday...I know I have mentioned it to you on at least 3 separate posts...On Monday nobody was trapped in their houses since there was no major flooding...

As to using "infrared technology" to detect the survivors well hon. we don’t have any...that is a 1960 era technology that is no longer in use...We now use thermal imagery 1990's era technology, which is far more refined...the point is moot since there was no flooding on Monday....


The flooding already existed after the hurricane. It was the day after that the water began to rise due to the broken levees, however, there was already water covering houses before the levees broke due to giant surges from Lake Pontchartraine. CNN and local news were showing the houses, the flooding. It was like Venice. They were under water. I will never forget watching on the Spanish channel, a Hispanic woman and her daughter discussing how she and her family went up to the 2nd storey, then to the attic, tried to use plastic objects to float, and they didn't work, and they could not go back down because everything was flooded. They discussed the advent that they would all drown. Here's a news story explaining the flooding after the hurricane. cbsnews.com/stories/2005/08/29/national/main798862.shtml

The levees broke on Tuesday, August 30, I believe. At that time the level of the flooding began increasing. However, that there were huge floods after the hurricane and before the levees broke, there were floods. The broken levees just kinda finished turning the area into hell.

As to "infrared", that was me. I said it was infrared. You're right that now they have the new and improved thermal. In either case, they used neither infrared, nor thermal, nor anything till today. Now it's too late. Too many days have passed. They're now saying they don't have enough personnel to break roofs and see if they can pull out the people. They have to leave people behind to die.

One story explains how they walked into a house where 3 old people in beds were very very sick, so they left them there. Another story explains how they entered a hospice and there were 10 cadavers and 10 people alive. All were sick, so they left them there. And so on, and so on. Right now they are unable to reach all the houses where there are people, so these people will die. The numbers of people drowned in their houses is making the rescuers sick and mentally ill.

This is a slow kind of murder.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 483 (view)
 
Should it be legal to shoot looters on site?
Posted: 9/4/2005 11:27:26 AM

what are u gonna do carry around a 40 inch plasma tv that u can t plug in ...u know that every store owner is going to claim 100 % loss whether or not that is the case ...is nt it more important to try to save the lives of people who are stranded and sick and starving than have some ***hole w/ a gun shoot them ??? the situation in new orleans is so messed up ...the gov t really blew it ...bush is the worst ..that they were nt there the next day w/ food and water and relief workers is a disgrace ...what do u do if u have no money ,no place to evacuate to ..and u r running out of food ..people thought bill clinton was bad for getting a blow job in the white house ..well bush has screwed and killed thousands ..he should be impeached and thrown out of office ..who did he ask to help w/ the relief ?? bill clinton !! Zarek


I agree.

As for this:
u r a fu8king idiot


Don't be too hard on buno. Buno is one of those people we need around, to make everyone else feel glad to be who they are.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 478 (view)
 
Should it be legal to shoot looters on site?
Posted: 9/4/2005 11:06:53 AM
Oh my dear< but I did vote for bush


Gosh, cuteathleticman! I **never** ever would've imagined THAT! I'm simply shocked.

Ahem.

Now let's get back on topic: Looters in chest-deep water, trying to find water, food. or something they could barter for water or food for themselves and their children. (There sure as hell isn't much else that can be done when one is on the verge of dehydrating to death in a chest-deep infected pool of floating human cadavers).
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 74 (view)
 
Why do women wear makeup?
Posted: 9/4/2005 11:03:08 AM

It's quite funny but every single person in this thread that has claimed to be wearing no meakeup in their pictures CLEARLY looks like they are wearing makeup! even if it's just eyeliner or lipstick, still counts as not being au naturale.


we all do it, why make excuses for it? It's part of being a woman. Men here's a newsflash for you: even the most natural looking women wear at least a little bit of something.

To quote Doris Day I think it was: (!?!?) "it takes me an hour to look like I am not wearing make-up at all!"




Women can go from this to this with a little Revlon.

Next, we'll tackle the topic of the truth about women and their orgasms.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 476 (view)
 
Should it be legal to shoot looters on site?
Posted: 9/4/2005 10:58:08 AM

Why????? Bush didn't cause the hurricane! food , supplies are great and Im sure they will come to good use BUT I believe we as a country donated over 10 bill to the sunami effort and countless other. Loans Getting repaid?


There's nothing as interesting as finding out who voted for Bush, and how it happened. They "out" themselves the minute they attempt to express themselves. They're exactly like him in every way.

 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 475 (view)
 
Should it be legal to shoot looters on site?
Posted: 9/4/2005 10:49:10 AM
Yes we are ok! We actually can take care of ourselves!! Wish other countries could do the same.. Thats why we are the "superpower of the world"


Oi vei. Really? Is that why we accepted 10,000,000 from Qatar as a handout, and Condoleeza has stated that we will be accepting handouts to help us with the catastrophe? After billions of my tax money spent on Bush's whim of attacking an innocent country (Iraq) we now have nothing to help our people with and need handouts. Aren't you proud?

Oh and by the way, these handouts, unlike the money we give other countries, which constitutes LOANS we get paid back to us, these are real handouts. Gifts.

_____________

On another note: Bush needs to apologize to those who suffered in New Orleans and ask their forgiveness.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 468 (view)
 
thank you, saritamiami
Posted: 9/4/2005 10:11:45 AM
My point was that my sister and these people got MOVING on a minutes notice.Thats entirely different to accepting death .They wanted to LIVE so they ran and with no thought of wat,who and where..Thats my point


You're not reading newspapers, watching news reports, reading blogs, reading our posts, or anything, are you?

I sometimes get the feeling that you just type anything at all, stick 50,000 smileys on your post, and send it off.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 71 (view)
 
Why do women wear makeup?
Posted: 9/4/2005 10:07:25 AM
this is why: http://www.ebaumsworld.com/celeb.html


That's pretty funny.

You know, you can take any woman, remove her makeup, give her a very short haircut or shave her head, remove her implants, have her dress in an ordinary pair of jeans and a shirt, and she looks like a man.

Human faces are generic.

Maybe makeup helps differentiate us from men. (So does hairstyle).
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 465 (view)
 
Should it be legal to shoot looters on site?
Posted: 9/4/2005 9:58:22 AM
From what the news has reported I don't think these folks knew what they were up against. I think the mayor should have told these folks, 'Hey look we have a cat 4 maybe 5 hurricane approching and the leeves are not built to withstand this. Get out now'.


On Thursday, we were watching TV at work, when it was announced that the Gov of the State of Louisiana and the Mayor "ORDERED" everyone out of New Orleans. I live in Miami and I heard the news report over and over again. "GET OUT OF THE CITY." In fact, we at work were discussing how N.O. would look completely empty, since we'd all been to N.O.

The rich of N.O. left asap by plane, car, or had already left before the announcement. The middle class of N.O. in their cars, clogged all the highways. I remember seeing that there wasn't one highway that wasn't clogged with traffic. At one point they announced that I-10 wasn't too bad, and suddenly within 30 minutes, it, too, was stopped with traffic.

What was left behind in N.O. we already know: the old, the ill, babies, the poor, the sub-poor. The helpless.


I find this an offensive juxapostion to just trivialize human suffering in this way. What a careless notion. Hope that noone ever trivializes your suffering in such a way.


Javan, I agree.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 36 (view)
 
Galveston, Tx survives & rebuilds a lot easier
Posted: 9/4/2005 9:46:22 AM
I had suggested in another forum that they could drop food and water out of hellicopters to the people scattered about wating to be rescued from their roof tops,...it was a suggestion that was scoffed at,...4 days later it was a suggestion that was implemented,...and seemed to work pretty well.....with air bases so close to the affected area why wasn't it done sooner?


You had an excellent idea, Marita, which I'm sure some people had up in the top echelons, including Bush's FEMA personnel, but it was a suggestion that probably GW Bush and his administration chose not to give the okay to. Louisiana's resources were used up to the max by Sunday evening, and Louisiana had no more to give or put out there, but this administration did nothing. Nothing.

2 policemen in N.O. have committed suicide from the horror of what they saw. 200 N.O. police officers have walked off the job from the horror. Louisiana's state employees were left alone to deal with this monster catastrophe, while Bush sat on his butt in air conditioning, in his Texas ranch, and pondered whether or not to deal with this at all, or just let people die, and entertain himself otherwise.

Monday night, I began to tell people I spoke to, that infrared technology (which the entire military has by now) should be used that very night, MONDAY NIGHT, by military helicopters, to determine which apartment houses and houses had LIVE, still living people (about to drown) in the attics, unable to break through the roof. It wasn't done. The apartment houses and houses were almost completely covered in water, and still the water level continued to rise, but it wasn't done. It wasn't done Tuesday, nor Wednesday, nor Thursday, nor Friday. Finally, yesterday NITE (Saturday NITE) it began to be done by the military. By now, many, many have drowned in the attic... entire families. I don't know how anyone is alive, but they say they've received a couple of calls of people who are still alive. The numbers of dead will probably be hidden from us. Count on it. I'm sure Bush's administration is discussing right now, as we speak, how to hide those numbers from the general population.

This is genocide, murder, call it what you want. It's the ugliest thing I've seen in my lifetime.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 431 (view)
 
Should it be legal to shoot looters on site?
Posted: 9/3/2005 11:10:58 PM
Somebody mentioned it earlier. What does a bus ticket to the next city cost?


A hell of a lot if you don't have money to pay it. Very little, if the person is one of us sitting behind our computers in complete comfort.


I remember interviews with residents on the week prior to the disaster. Many placed their fate with god. They chose to stick it out. No one mentioned being incapable of leaving.


Callous comment by someone who evidently has enough money for a ticket out of a city, and is currently sitting in comfort behind his computer.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 428 (view)
 
Should it be legal to shoot looters on site?
Posted: 9/3/2005 11:08:30 PM

Totally obvious to me other are in fear to admit this they don't want a possible race war on their hands, so people are just going to say over and over again race and or class had nothing to do with it...And how many people leave an area they live in when there's a warning of bad weather? Especally when they don't have money, for gas, lodging, food...I wonder how many of these people that died were old, or handicapped on monthly checks? We will find out...Soon.


Byrd, you just made a point that hadn't even occurred to me. You're right. A lot of this insistance on political correctness, and encouraging to not mention that almost all the displaced people in those areas are black, could indeed very well be because they're afraid of a possible race war.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 419 (view)
 
Should it be legal to shoot looters on site?
Posted: 9/3/2005 10:38:49 PM

I honestly think people were hoping for the best case scenario. Many times, we've witnessed hurricanes coming toward the coast only to sputter out or change course. I think the residents believed this and decided to hunker down.


That's not what actually happened. The rich left the areas. The middle class left the areas. All those who could afford to, or had an automobile and money for gas, and were not unhealthy, left the areas. What was left was the poor, the sick and the old. It is they that the news reports have been talking about constantly since Monday night. Why are we still wondering what the populations being rescued consist of? This has been explained over and over ad nauseaum. Are we going to pretend it's Monday night again and have to discuss all over again what this population of displaced actually consists of?
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 417 (view)
 
Should it be legal to shoot looters on site?
Posted: 9/3/2005 10:29:33 PM

I'm white actually the color of my skin is white and in my opinion it's racism, I don't care what others think, just my opinion...It's also racism of class "Poor people, and African Americans..."


Precisely. Thank you for that, Byrd.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 413 (view)
 
Irishmary is Chromatically Mnemonic ?
Posted: 9/3/2005 10:18:02 PM
Nittany, listen closely 'cause you're evidently not thinking clearly tonight. The point is not how many people there are or are not in New Orleans, how many are black, how many are not, etc. The point is that in every angle of every shot, of every camera, it's an OCEAN OF BLACK PEOPLE. I don't care what the stats are anywhere. The delay on the part of George W. Bush was remarkably slow and it's not just me saying that it was a racist delay. Republicans and Democrats, rappers and celebrities, the entire nation, other countries, everywhere people are coming out with the comment that it was a RACIST DELAY.

Please stop bringing up inconsequential information such as, "Well, New Orleans has a lot of black people", when what's being discussed is the slowness of the response that it actually took this freak 5 days before he sent anyone in to drop water to these dehydrated, sick, dying people.

Now please stop responding to me. I do believe you need to get some sleep or something. Your thinking is remarkably cloudy.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 407 (view)
 
Irishmary is Chromatically Mnemonic ?
Posted: 9/3/2005 10:06:20 PM
Yep before bushy boy and his croonies even went out on their little tour of the destruction they were patting each other on the back like a rerun of cops good old boys, "You can put the race card away for a rainey day..." I don't think so what happened here is racism at it's finest and I thought we were beyond all this. Bullshit we bomb the crap out of a country because they might have weapons of mass destruction, and none were ever found..Then one of our greatest cities is neglected for awhole week during a disaster because the victims were people of color, and poor it's very clear to me...


I agree Byrd. I'm trying reeeeeeeeeeeal hard to be politically correct and not call it racism, but I've yet to turn on the TV that I don't see an OCEAN of black people. Sure, once in a blue moon there's a white. Seldom, tho. But I'll keep trying my damndest to not call it racism. I guess I'm going to have to do some pretending. Every foreign newspaper I've read has said "black people" because the whites in the crowd are negligible. But I'm trying to not call it racism.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 403 (view)
 
Irishmary is Chromatically Mnemonic ?
Posted: 9/3/2005 9:48:52 PM
^^^ I can defend Irishmary's posts.. But I won't touch this one ;-)


I expected that. That's because George W Bush DID wait from Monday to Friday to help thousands of black people. If they'd been white, Bush would've sent help Monday night. Even Republicans are speaking out (which comes as a total surprise to me!) Newt Gingrich (whom I *never* thought I'd hear speak out against Bush), is speaking out on this saying the slow response to help these people is inexcusable.
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 400 (view)
 
I've never heard such bs in my life
Posted: 9/3/2005 9:41:08 PM
You can put the "race-card" away for a rainy day.


The "race" card? Is that the card that says, "George W Bush and his administration waited from Monday to Friday to send help to thousands of black people who were drowning, dehydrated, dying and injured?"
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 26 (view)
 
Should Flooded New Orleans ever be rebuilt,...where it is?
Posted: 9/3/2005 9:39:11 PM

The USA should bring in some engineers from Holland to assist in planning things. They have reclaimed land from the sea, and have done an excellent job at keeping their country safe - even though it is mainly below sea level.

The only thing they would have to learn about, and factor in, is the physics behind the weather there.

It won't ever happen, based on good ol' Yankee pride though.


The suggestion of the engineers from Holland is great. They have awesome experience. The only problem I see is that at least the Netherlands is out of harm's way with respect to hurricanes, whereas Louisiana is practically a bull's eye for hurricanes, and scientists have advised that the next few decades will bring many killer hurricanes due to the global warming man has caused.


No. It shouldn't be rebuilt. Why? So every year people can suffer and rebuild and suffer and rebuild? I know New Orleans has suffered from natural disasters alot already but why do people have to live in places that are potentially dangerous. I have considered moving closer to the ocean many times because I love it but I can't get over the troubles that come with living by the ocean, not to mention how expensive it is. No, I think I will stay in the interior of BC where I do feel safe and I know my family is safe. I am not staying out of fear, I am staying due to pure logic.


That sounds pretty logical to me, Flex!
 saritamiami
Joined: 12/3/2004
Msg: 397 (view)
 
Should it be legal to shoot looters on site?
Posted: 9/3/2005 9:29:42 PM
1) On Miami TV, there were warnings on Saturday night that the hurricane was headed to New Orleans, and that if it did, there would be a catastrophe of mammoth proportions.
2) On Sunday it was KNOWN that the hurricane would hit New Orleans, and Miami TV was reporting what was expected (a catastrophe of mammoth proportions).
3) New Orleans' rich class had left. The middle class was leaving.
4) Monday morning the hurricane struck and it continued to strike till late in the afternoon. Miami TV was showing the rampant destruction, and describing what would be the loss of life for those who didn't have the money or means to get out. George W. Bush was still on vacation, enjoying himself. He made no effort to do anything but enjoy himself.
5) On Monday night, Miami TV showed people on roofs begging for help, people who had tools breaking open roofs and getting out, from amidst oceans. People neck-deep in water begging for help. People hanging on to whatever they could begging for help. GW Bush was still on vacation. The mayor and governor had begun to freak out seeing no help was coming.
6) On Tuesday morning, GW Bush decided that perhaps he should cut his vacation short due to this pesky hurricane, and go to Washington. The water levels had continued to go up. It was known that people inside attics without means of breaking roofs were going to drown if federal help didn't arrive soon.
7) Bush did nothing till Friday. On Friday, when the Mayor tore him a new ***hole publicly, and riots due to dehydration, death and devastation were breaking out, only *THEN* did he call out the military, allotted funds and decided maybe it was serious.

This is an evil country that allows evil individuals to commit genocide.
 
Show ALL Forums