Are there any men out there that want more than just sex?

You made a comment about how most women "normally" get off easily...That's a FALLACY.

The entire reason you are capable of thought/etc. is due to electricity.

So now what - are we voting on who gets to invade/visit us? Never thought we'd have a choice.

Not in my world. Rock is king.

Standards are cool too.

I did take college level courses in just that

* I also said that I take advantage of that fact that we BOTH agree happens and utilize it to help select numbers!
* Capitalize on that aspect and USE it to help select numbers
* But you can make a series of selections to increase your chances

Check ANY web page that has "lotto tips" on it

Jeeze, contradictory or what?

Kind of like playing the stock market....which way will it go....nobody knows for sure....

Using math you CANNOT increase your chances.

By using observation and following the clusters, etc, you CAN, and DO increase your chances for a win.

Because the draws ARE random, you have as much chance as I do...except that I have far more chances of hitting a win than you do because I was able to put MY money on selections that are MORE probable to come up!

But by observation, I can....

Never underestimate the power of simple observation.

Disco died in the 70's. Thank God!

I disagree, as do many others. I've outlined certain things that can and DO help generate a better chance of winning.

I've outlined certain things that can and DO help generate a better chance of winning.

But WHICH number gets chosen?

Would it be better to choose THAT number than the one that ins't chosen as often? Of course!

I know exactly what I'm seeing.

But, cycles repeat.

I take advantage of that.

I harm nobody.

But...if those "patterns" follow along a certain path, why wouldn't I follow to see where it goes? 

Whereas, in the lottery, there ARE winners, every week. 

There is just too much evidence pointing towards that to ignore it. 

Sure, I wish I could express it mathematically. I can't.

But they don't...A glance at any chart that shows the number of times a the balls have dropped shows that clearly. 

And "google is my friend"? Don't patronize me.

Jeremy and James...I do understand where you are coming from.

Anyhow's...mathematically speaking....no...you can't increase your odds...but with observation and a few tips and tricks, you still get to increase your chances.

Some people are just quiet lovers.

I don't refuse to listen to ideas, I refuse to listen to folks like you

it's your whole attitude about it.

I can paint a pretty picture for you but you'll think it's ugly.

I could increase the chances of getting a win...and have done so

But observation has brought out some oddities which I take advantage of.

Mathematically, each ball should come up at about the same rate.

Name one.

I'm not a math genius either and my understanding of this could be all wrong...
I don't know enough about physics to know if he's a charlatan or not...
I haven't the slightest clue how the following works …
I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed when it comes to physics …
I'll confess that I haven't fully wrapped my head around special relativity …
I don't have any facts to confuse you with, just speculation...

free speech=freedom of expression. So the owner of the tennesse titans was fined 250000 dollars for flipping off the opposing teams fans after his team won the game. It is time to decide if freedom of speech still exists or not because I am confused.

non-consecutive number sequences are more likely than consecutive ones. That doesn't translate into "3,17,26,29,37,44" being more likely than "1,2,3,4,5,6"."

Perhaps I should say something like ANY non-consecutive sequence IS more likely to come up than a consecutive one. 

Oh...just for fun...the sequence of 3, 17, 26, 29, 37, 44 has won just over $700.00 since the 649 was launched. The 1,2,3,4,5,6 sequence has won just under $500.00 for the same timeperiod. (Told ya, I've been tracking things.... )

Guess the proof is in the winnings huh?

Why? Do you want me to do your work for you?

No, because I place myself under the jurisdiction of natural law

As I said before I'm losing my emotional investment in helping people, but I will leave you with the key that can unlock the chains of oppression. You are NOT a person, you HAVE a person. If you can remember that and study a bit, you'll be able to handle yourself against the system.

The institutions the acronyms stand for ARE the evidence!

My position is that a criminal gang of bankers

controlling various countries by controlling their economies.

It is no coincidence that most of the western world started operating in receivership in 1934.

It is true of both the commonwealth countries and of the US. What we once called countries are really corporations, owned and controlled by boards composed of these bankers and their more local henchmen

That Nathan Rothschild took control of the economy of the British empire after Waterloo is a matter of record.

Would you care to refute my allegations?

There are more than ever. You just don't recognize them.

quit being such a jealous, whiney BEATCH. Grow up a little.

Did our science teachers explain those exact experiments and their results?

What happens then, if our teachers explain to us a theory that has not been proved, or is even wrong?

we are just accepting what we are told without question

then argue that anyone who disagrees with us is wrong

Is that a good thing? Nope. Does that guarantee that a lot of what we think is true, is probably wrong, and pure manipulation, to make us willing slaves?

we never had the guts to question our science teachers and demand that they back up what they said, when it was our right to, and when we should have done.

As opposed to telling them to go piss up a rope the next time they try to collect income tax, and maybe suing for all the taxes they've bilked you out of over the years in a class action suit. If you are still a free country, you should be able to pull it off (though I'd bet they'd rather settle quietly out of court).

If you aren't still free, at least you'll know where you stand (at the point of a gun)

In my world, the people are self-governing and their own highest authority.

Pretty simple really...rightfully yours all along.

That one is laughable...It's happening now!

I mean it's ludicrous to think that the richest, most powerful men on the planet would ever have a plan to increase their power, right?

Actually it is fairly easy to argue it. In point of fact anything else is the most egregious form of censorship. It is far better to have these things out in the open, where lies and fallacies can be exposed for what they are, than to hide such unreasoning philosophies and give them the appeal of the forbidden fruit and a just reason to cry foul.

I'm not a math genius either and my understanding of this could be all wrong...
I don't know enough about physics to know if he's a charlatan or not...
I haven't the slightest clue how the following works …
I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed when it comes to physics …
I'll confess that I haven't fully wrapped my head around special relativity …
I don't have any facts to confuse you with, just speculation...

I did post a couple of links...
As for refusing to post links...

I can't help it...I like to pout.

Let's. Where on Earth did I use the word "defend"?

 I guess you don't know that half the gadgets you own come from someone watching Star Trek, seeing them use a gadget, and thinking "that would be cool. I wonder if it's possible?"

You think that you've read all the scientific knowledge and archaeological knowledge there is

I don't think you'd find many who would say it's not theoretically possible for you to appreciate "good" just as much as someone who had been through "bad".

But from what we see of cancer patients in remission

There is Judaism's view of G-d, and there is the Xian view of G-d.

Isn't the ambiguity of verbal communication a pain in the behind?

When did I ever say just because it came from a dream it makes it true? How about never? Yup, never.

What I did say, however, is that it doesn't mean it's BS just because it came from a dream, which is a completely different statement. English 101, anyone?

I then used Einstein as an example because of the supposed rumor 

dreams have some merit as far as the discovery of new ideas.

and probably why he's not more widely accepted.

I see how that can be threatening to old school physicists...

I said plague in the thread heading not to be sensationalistic

Am I being an alarmist?

Excuse me all to hell for wanting to make people aware of something the general media seems to be ignoring.

From here on in I'll do what George Carlin did and just watch the show.

I'd say you guys can all go hang yourselves, but you've already done that and don't seem to mind, so what's the point?

If you really like living under a bunch of powermad, crooked thieves who rob you at every turn you're welcome to it.

I'm tired of trying to lead people out through the hole in the fence when they won't even look to see it.

Enjoy the upcoming depression and the unelected global government it will bring with it.

Guess who gets the bill?

China will be the next #1 superpower within the next ten years

You've looked at all of the data personally?

BukkRogers, sounds like you have an old case of, I've made up my mind, don't confuse me with facts."

The drawback is that I don't have any facts to confuse you with, just speculation.

It's funny you should mention that because it's also been mentioned that Einstein derived his famous equation from a dream.

Oh isn't that nice of them. Do you have any idea how much that sounds like a plantation worker bragging about how good the "massa" is?...or a kid bragging about how Mom & Dad let him keep a portion of what he makes make delivering papers?

Just who is the boss in the country?

It obviously isn't "the people" anymore!

These clowns are supposed to be YOUR SERVANTS...WAKE UP!!

do you think this is what your founding fathers had in mind for you?

Your post indicates pretty strongly that your country is no longer the "land of the free."

If you don't rise up in righteous revolt over how you've been conned out of everything you worked for by a crooked gang of banking thieves (and their lawyer cronies) called the Fed (who have bought most of your "representatives"), you won't be able to claim it as the "home of the brave" either.

You guys fought a (just) war over this kinda crap two hundred years ago.

Have you got the guts to do it again, or is it easier to think that the "massa" is good to you?

Therein lies the deception that puts you in bondage.

There is a very real difference between money and promissory notes. I suggest you learn it.

Gold and silver coins are money.

I think JFK issued some real "non-Fed" money too, but I'm not sure. He may have been assassinated before he had the chance.

I might, but you probably won't listen to it...I'm just another nut case conspiracy theorist ranting about the "international bankers".

* I said that if there were some variables that affected the picks, you can't simply dismiss them without knowing what effect they have.
* I'd like to point out, again, that without knowing the effect on the system, you can't say whether it's statistically significant or not.

I've been arguing with yna6 that there ISN'T a way and all of the number sequences are equally likely

You CAN'T call the difference minuscule if you don't know what the difference is or what effect it has on the system.

 Read some of my other posts.

I'm done reading dribble about people who haven't the first clue about statistics waxing on as if they do.

Guys should take note here, don't take the competition with you.

Like I said before, all you guys are being played for suckers and you don't own anything you think you do. It all belongs to the government. They (in all their wonderful beneficence) just let you use it to fool you into thinking you're getting something for your labour; it keeps you working & producing for them.

Your dollar isn't money, it is only a promise to pay that discharges the debt

Okay smart-ass, why don't you explain it to those us not possessing your obvious superior intellect?

Your responses are nothing more than snarky quips, leading me to believe you don't know what you're talking about.

Next time you attempt to contribute something to a thread, try not to come off sounding like such an arrogant genius.

If there were characteristics about a ball that made it more likely to be picked, you can't say whether or not it's statistically significant without knowing how much more likely it is (or defining "significant").

Another quote you comment on starts out with "If perfect randomness is presumed impossible" and you go on to talk about how the fact that it is random means it doesn't matter (did you even read it?!). If a particular machine was predisposed to certain numbers for whatever reason (the actual reason isn't important) and WASN'T random, then yes, knowledge of this can help your chances of winning.

So are you saying that you would rather wait until it turns up on your doorstep before you'll believe it exists?

There is plenty of info on the web (and a little in the MSM). At least have a look before you start with the "Chicken Little" crap.

The Health Ministry confirmed 315 deaths of flu and acute respiratory viral infections in 23 regions, the city of Kyiv and Crimea as of November 16

Seriously, any alien intelligence smart enough to conquer the navigational and propulsion problems behind interstellar travel would probably consider us little more than a disease.

However, it's possible the weight of the extra paint for the number 49 compared to the number 1 makes it more likely (just a tiny bit more likely) to pop out first ;)

during the time that a certain few numbers are picked at a disproportianate level, would "betting" on those numbers give you and edge?

you can't discount a bias in the physical process that chooses the numbers, even if it's very small.

What do you mean by this? I've only taken one stats class, and can't claim to remember all of it......

If perfect randomness is presumed impossible, on the other hand, and if you knew which of the machines they'd use that week, you could study previous draws from that machine for patterns and choose the most common numbers.

Groupings seem to be a characteristic of randomness.

All things considered, I think greed - the desire to pursue one's self-interest - is a very good thing in our free market economy. 

Call that whatever you want, but it IS greed. 

But I don't buy that as a valid definition of greed.
A better definition of greed is the pursuit of one's self-interest

That's pisspoor logic in my opinion.

Is it not greed to contiue working to earn more money when you already have a roof over your head, food on your plate, and clothes on your back? 

According to your logic, that is a bad thing. To me, it is very, very good.

I can think of one good reason not to....how can appreciate anything that is "good" if you have never experienced anything "bad"?

the existence of God being one of those things.

i dont understand how after a year and a half of nothing but good times and learning experienes our relationship can turn into this.

now i have nothing but a basket of confusion

he smiled and said that i would.

Do i wait for him or do i settle for 2nd best?