Normally I'm big on compassion.

But not in this case.

Aww poor woman. I bet Sharon Tate would have liked some compassion too. Rot in hell freak.

An intelligent driver is constantly reminded of the necessity of driving safely and defensively.

A truck owner embodies the opposite logic .

There happen to be a lot more idiotic PickUp owners in the USA than Lambo owners
so I picked on them first. It's easy because they don't read well and they have no sense of logic.

originally posted by crash1967:

....then let me explain it for you again using very small words...

...bush lied to the American people to get us to invade another third world county where lots of innocent people have died, 12 billion dollar in cash flat out dissapeared, 12 billion dollars are being spent there a month, and has put our economy into the shitter as a result....just like he did with the other "corporations" that he's ever been at the helm at.

now, we are talking about crimesa against humanity, acts of treason, and a betrayal of what our government is supposed to be about... if we don't do something about that as a people who claim to love this country then we deserve more pain....perhaps you just don't understand the weight of the words i've just written but if this sort of crap is given a pass then kiss everything else goodbye....

huukdonfoniks wrote:

The back seat of my car is rarely occupied. I guess I should have purchased a 2 seater.

I live alone in a house that has 4 bedrooms. I should have purchased a 1 bedroom cottage and had the occasional friend sleep on the kitchen floor.

I have a fishing pole I only use a few times a year. Guess I'd be better off renting since it just sits there most of the time.

What a ludicrous thread.

Montreal Guy wrote:

Sorry , but calling American ( and other Western military forces) terrorists doesn't cut it with me either.

I have a great respect for the job that they do, and have had the great honor of knowing more than my fair share of troops serving in various military units.

U.S, British, Canadian, Dutch, and Israeli....amongst others.

I've also met an shook hands with a lot of vets, from various countries, and that's always a thrill.

I've also read enough military blogs to tell me that some of the best and brightest people out there are wearing uniforms - and serving their countries. I nearly signed up myself, and the only thing stopping me now is my age.

If you have a problem with wars, don't blame the soldier - blame the men that sent them there.

No matter what you think about the war, never disrespect the warrior.

And calling them, as a group, terrorists.....is doing exactly that.

Originally posted by Reddwine:
Let's give her the benefit of the doubt. The adrenalin is running so high I'm sure the candidates have scrambled eggs for brains by now...think about it.

grandmabooboo wrote:

At age 31, this comment makes perfect sense....you're still in "party til you puke" mode. Keep in mind however that you're looking for women who are in the "childbearing years", and are much more likely to see "stability" with a particular number attached to it.

Haven't had that experience, thank god (!) but I did find out that a man I was talking to on here had a previous conviction for domestic violence...Whew...he actually admitted it to me amazingly enough!

loveoregon wrote:

The woman in Applebees was obviously trying to cope with the fact that the guy preferred the dog over her.

Being mauled to death by a tiger is a just punishment for taunting the animal? What if it was your son or daughter? I can't believe some of the responses i have read in this thread. Those kids did not deserved to die. As far as who was at fault here..it was the Zoo. How can you come to any other conclusion? That animal should not have been able to leap the wall to get to ANYBODY.

Faithnoman, if you don't have anything useful to contribute to the topic at hand, please keep your comments to yourself. You are not here to critique or judge my posts, so if the only thing you want to do is attack me personally you really have no place in this thread.

Originally posted by cocytus:


Are you capable of debating a subject w/o attempting personal attacks?

Originally posted by mizbeth:


P.S. Tony wants his shirt back.

originally posted by UnzippedPassion


The tiger was a victim of circumstance

originally posted by mixbex

And I can't believe you wrote that. You must be a Liberal.

Hardly. However, stupid people tend to irritate me.

You strike me as judgmental and unable to read people.

Am I correct?

The lack of empathy for fellow human beings in the posting is disturbing.

HAHAHAHAHA kids got drunk and did something stupid and now one of them is dead ...im glad you are all celebrating this here... yeah miss claudia im sure u and all of your saintly siblings never did anything stupid. the zoo is at fault here for not being up to code,as it has been many times in the past.

and maybe what the tiger did wasn't ENOUGH.

this is the reason i only taunt the weak and small animals when i go to the zoo...
i/e, flamingos, spider monkeys, prarie dogs, lizards, occasional ant eater, etc.

I will tell you why because all most of the ladys are looking for boy toys, A women of say 45 says she is looking for some one between the age of 35 and 47 so does that tell why we are chating with people alot younger. Some one might be 44 and put looking for someone under 49 so thier is an opening for a 25 years old

Originally posted by Bethlet:

Answer to first part:

Because they really want to screw you.

Answer to the second part:

Because they prefer to screw 20 somethings.

And they are hoping that you are too young and dumb to know the answers to the above questions. Men that age that prefer to do young always prefer that they are also dumb.