online dating service
REGISTER | MAIL/PROFILE | HELP | NOW ONLINE | SEARCH | RATING | FORUMS | SUCCESS STORIES

 

     
Posted In Forum:
Home   login   MyForums  
Show ALL Forums  
 
 Author Thread: Circumsision and its woes.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 113 (view)
 
Circumsision and its woes.
Posted: 11/20/2009 11:33:01 AM
Wow, this thread has taught me way more about the penis than I ever wanted to know.

And I find myself on the same side of the fence as scorpio in this argument. What a strange and surreal feeling that is.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 40 (view)
 
The double slit experiment (the elephant in the room).
Posted: 11/20/2009 11:28:14 AM
I don't know much about the experiment but I wonder if in order for the observer (whatever device that is) to observe (or rather, detect) the photons, it requires an interaction with those photons which can adjust their behaviour (such as altering its direction or staggering its motion) and that change in behaviour changes the results.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 89 (view)
 
H1N1 vaccine. Are you getting a shot?
Posted: 11/20/2009 11:02:54 AM

No. The chances of a crisis erupting from an approaching comet or black hole are microscopically slim, but there is a very real prospect of smallpox reappearing - by mutating again, because we missed some repository of it somewhere while vaccinating everyone, or (perhaps most of all) because somebody uses it as a biological weapon. That makes it very relevant to discussions of whether vaccination is a good idea.
Since vaccines save lives, they are a good idea. If your imaginary smallpox disease comes along, giving vaccines and saving lives is a good idea. If your smallpox does NOT come along, giving vaccines and saving lives is still a good idea. If you muddy the waters by imagining various other diseases, giving vaccines and saving lives is still a good idea.
whether flu shots are a good deal or not depends entirely on the details, and there is lots of reason to consider they are not.
Which is why we should compare the risks. I'll take a sore shoulder and possibly a fever over being bedridden for a week or two and possibly dead any day.
My point, and hence the relevance of autism diagnosis, is that those studies only prove there is no obvious and measurable connection, because that's all they're capable of showing. The probability of error in diagnosis is so high that there's no chance of showing a subtle effect, which is the big concern here.
I've seen this kind of rationale before when studies don't support what someone wants to believe. The bottom line is that the studies do not support any link between vaccines and autism. If you didn't like Reebok running shoes you could also say that the studies don't support the idea the Reebok shoes have an obvious connection with autism because that's all they're capable of showing, but they could have a subtle connection so be wary when you throw on your Reeboks and that subtle connection is the big concern here. So should we be concerned when we put on our Reeboks because of the possibility of subtle connection with autism? - Hardly.

Your argument here is no more than handwaving and blind speculation. Just because there's no evidence linking vaccines and autism doesn't mean there isn't a subtle connection. Just because there's no evidence linking picking your nose and autism doesn't mean there isn't a subtle connection. Just because there's no evidence linking scratching your ass and autism doesn't mean there isn't a subtle connection. Its all the same pointless, meaningless speculation. Your argument is not supported by evidence.

Bad example... Doctors and scientists do advise against eating too much tuna or other high-mercury seafood .
True enough, I'll concede that point. I often see people demonize thimerosal because of the mercury inside it so I like the seafood example to give mercury a prettier face, so to speak.
Almost certainly there are more and more false diagnoses caused by practitioners stretching the boundaries of diagnosis for various reasons; pressure, bias, simple keenness.
A good example of this is when an institution gets additional funding for supporting someone with autism - this leads to its practitioners being motivated to diagnose someone as having autism even if they aren't sure if they really have it.
The bottom line is we can't conclude much of anything definite about what relationship there might be between environmental effects and autism, or any other neurological disorder, until we can reliably diagnose them on some physical basis and then track correlations.
On post #83 you claimed that vaccines are a cause of autism (they are "not the sole cause" you said) and now you are admitting that diagnosing autism is subjective and you also agree that there is no evidence linking vaccines with autism. In short, you've admitted that your claim about vaccines being a cause of autism was unfounded and unsupported by evidence.
All three of those criteria are very subjective and diagnosed on the basis of observation, not through any actual physical markers.
You're right that diagnosis is primarily based on behaviour, but there's many physical markers linked with autism. For example, autism often accompanies fragile X syndrome, autism in girls has been linked to mutations of a gene called MECP, autism accompanied by abnormal head size may be related to mutations of the PTEN gene, and MRI imaging may reveal evidence of autism as well. (http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/96448.php). Tuberous sclerosis and mutations on chromosome 13 may reveal evidence of autism too (http://www.medicinenet.com/autism/page3.htm).

In any case, looks like we're veering off topic.

If you have any evidence to support a link between autism and vaccines, I'd love to hear it. If all you have is blind speculation, that's not very convincing.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 84 (view)
 
H1N1 vaccine. Are you getting a shot?
Posted: 11/19/2009 3:18:20 PM
TravellerSEB
No. You're lumping all vaccines together, and they are decidedly not all of equal effectiveness, safety or benefit. Immunizing kids against polio is a no-brainer. That doesn't remotely prove that it's a good idea to immunize them against flu as well.
What an odd thing to say. You seem to be saying that [insert whatever claim you're trying to say here] does not 'prove' that its a good idea to immunize people against the flu and I suppose that you're right. But we don't immunize people because of [insert your claim, whatever it is, here], we immunize people against the flu to prevent illness and death. As the H1N1 vaccine prevents millions of people from getting sick and hundreds or perhaps thousands from dying, its absurd to think that isn't enough to make flu immunizations "a good idea."

What they never tell you with these boasts is this: if and when smallpox re-appears (fairly likely since it's thought to be just a random mutation of cowpox) it will be absolutely devastating because almost nobody will have any immunity to it.
Another thing they don't tell you is that if a planet-sized comet strikes the earth, that will be devastating too. And another is that if the earth got sucked into a black hole, that would be devastating. Another thing they don't tell you is the color of the underwear they wore that day. There's lots of irrelevant things they don't tell you, because they're irrelevant. Should they announce that their vaccine does not provide immunity to make-believe diseases that don't exist? - there's no need, because we already know.
The smallpox vaccine saved hundreds of millions of lives, perhaps more than a billion, last century alone. Regardless if some imaginary illness comes along after the fact, saving lives is a good thing.

I've probably been immunized against more things than most people ever will be (last time I checked, I think the list was smallpox, polio, tetanus, diphtheria, whooping cough, yellow fever, typhoid, hepatitis A & B, Japanese encephalitis
And Japanese encephalitis too? Damn. You got me beat hands down.

It's also very well known from case studies that heavy metal poisoning (mercury in particular) can cause symptoms much like autism, as well as other neurological disabilities.
I don't see the relevance.
Mercury is found in seafood btw. There's far more mercury in a can of tuna than there is in a vaccine containing thimerosal (which is approx 50% ethylmercury, which is the 'good' mercury - methylmercury is the 'bad' mercury that is neurotoxic).
Furthermore, the current state of psychology/psychiatry/neurology is such that diagnosing neurological disorders, including autism and even more grossly obvious things like MS, is subjective and difficult - and there's no likelihood of that changing any time soon.
Irrelevant. And not entirely correct either - we are getting better and better at diagnosing autism, even when its subtle, and this increased awareness is shown by the increase in autism diagnoses (changing diagnostic criteria is another factor that increases these numbers as well).
That presents obvious problems in running large-scale surveys to answer the question of whether small doses of neurotoxins cause subtle damage; even if there is a real effect there's not much chance of seeing it.
Ethylmercury and methylmercury have very different toxicities. Methylmercury accumulates in the body in repeated exposure over time, and thus is toxic. Ethylmercury does not. Thimerosal contains ethylmercury.
And if mercury was a legitimate concern, people would rally against seafood, not thimerosal, since seafood contains more.

Thimerosal is just a preservative, and you can get some shots without it.
Very true.

The World Health Organization has concluded that there is no evidence of toxicity from thimerosal in vaccines.
Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (2006-07-14). "Thiomersal and vaccines". World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/topics/thiomersal/en/index.html.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 81 (view)
 
H1N1 vaccine. Are you getting a shot?
Posted: 11/18/2009 11:58:02 AM

The American Medical Association have acknowledge earlier this year that there may indeed be some correlation with Autism.

Ahhh yes, I have the AMA (American Medical Association) article right here:

AMA: Ruling Shows More Evidence of No Connection Between Vaccines and Autism
For immediate release:
Feb. 12, 2009

Statement attributable to:
Joseph Heyman, MD.
AMA Board Chair

“Three recent rulings by the Special Masters of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims provides even more overwhelming evidence that there is no association between vaccines and autism or related disorders. Vaccines are one of the best public health accomplishments of all time and have proven time and time again their ability to keep horrific diseases at bay. Measles, rubella, and polio are among the success stories of diseases eliminated in the U.S., but are still active in other countries and could rebound here.

“Autism is a heart-wrenching condition, and the upheaval felt by parents whose children suffer with autism is understandable – as is their search for answers. We need ongoing research into the causes of autism, but cannot let unfounded myths keep us from giving our children the proven protection they need against infectious diseases.”

# # #
Contact:

Mollie E. Turner
Public Information Officer
American Medical Association

http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/no-index/news/vaccines-autism.shtml

Incidentally, I'm very impressed by this
I knew something had gone wrong with my child around the time she was given her vaccines of HTP....but then I know that is was ...it is my obligation to try to continue to protect my children from illness. My children continue to receive their vaccines on a regular basis.
Even though you suspected the vaccine, you still made a tough decision in favor of your children's health. That is the sign of a great parent. Props to you.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 142 (view)
 
Is a guy that cooks *so* rare?
Posted: 11/18/2009 11:49:49 AM
A couple days ago I made myself this great big awesome beef and potato gratin.
...and now I'm sick of gratin. ugh. Anyone want some leftovers?
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 79 (view)
 
H1N1 vaccine. Are you getting a shot?
Posted: 11/18/2009 11:29:36 AM
^*Ever, You are suggesting that vaccines kill people I see. And look, you've backed it up with so much evidence!

Anti-vaccine websites are everywhere. And whenever someone gets a vaccine and they get any kind of illness shortly afterward (which of course almost never has anything to do with the vaccine) they pounce on it and point the blame squarely on the shoulders of the vaccine as the only possible cause....
...and yet, strangely, after checking multiple sites that whine about the H1N1 vaccine,I don't see these sites blaming it for deaths - only stuff like guillain barre, dystonia and milder things like fever, sore arm, aches, etc.

But by all means, feel free to pretend that vaccines kill people. Its very amusing to the rest of us.
And as the H1N1 vaccine saves hundreds or thousands of lives, feel free to try your best to convince others that saving lives is a bad thing.


As a parent of 3 children.... one with mild Autism...due to I strongly belief to some side effect of her childhood immunizations.
The time when kids are typically diagnosed with autism is also the time when they get a vaccine shot so parents often correlate the vaccine as the cause. The connection seems even more plausible when an autistic child regresses - for example s/he starts talking less - which is very common in autism.

From a biological standpoint, it doesn't make sense though. The vaccine didn't invade your child's 30 trillion cells and change the DNA in each of them to make him autistic. The child had autism when he left the womb, you just didn't know it yet.

Of historical note, the idea that vaccines cause autism began with a study led by Dr. Andrew Wakefield. He performed the study with 12 other authors who were unaware that Wakefield was being paid by 12 parents of autistic children who were trying to sue manufacturers of the MMR vaccine - when this information came to light, Wakefield's obvious conflict of interest was revealed and he was charged with professional misconduct. Essentially, these 12 parents believed MMR caused their childrens' autism and they paid Wakefield £400,000 to rig a study to support that idea.

He is also guilty of falsifying data, data fixing, and scientific misconduct, and his conclusions resulted in a large drop in MMR immunizations which naturally led to increased incidence of illness. 10 of the other 12 authors of the study quickly retracted their support and exclaimed "We wish to make it clear that in this paper no causal link was established between (the) vaccine and autism, as the data were insufficient. However the possibility of such a link was raised, and consequent events have had major implications for public health. In view of this, we consider now is the appropriate time that we should together formally retract the interpretation placed upon these findings in the paper, according to precedent."
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 2 (view)
 
The Art of Discourse
Posted: 11/18/2009 11:13:53 AM
Depends on who I'm arguing with. More specifically, it depends on why they believe what they believe.

Personally, I think its silly to believe something merely because its a tradition that has been handed down through generations, or because its a rumor that is spread by many, or because its told to me by my parents, or teachers, or elders, or priests, or scientists.

But many others believe for those reasons, so I often tailor my arguments accordingly. If their beliefs are based on rumors, hearsay, etc I may point out that their beliefs are unjustified. If they say their beliefs are based on evidence then I present evidence (although I usually do anyway).

If talking to them in real life, I make sure to listen carefully. The best way to be heard is to listen, and besides, you have to know what their argument is in order to address it.

For a while I was ignorant in my beliefs and I would stubbornly cling to certain ideas, not because they were true, but because they were palatable. I attributed my stubborness to nice sounding terms like 'strength of conviction' and 'faith.' The awful truth is that being stubborn is weak, not strong, and accepting a lie and calling it 'faith' is like pouring syrup on sh*t and calling it 'pancakes.'

Some people are too proud to admit when they are wrong, even when they know they're wrong. Real character and real honesty comes when you have the courage to admit when you're wrong and to adjust your beliefs accordingly. I'm respectful of those who search for truth and wary of those who say they found it. The path that I take towards truth is one of observation and analysis, its one with the humility and courage to accept things even when I don't want them to be true, its one that forms a reasoned opinion based on the evidence. The best days are when I'm shown to be wrong, and the adjustment I make in beliefs accordingly results in personal growth.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 76 (view)
 
H1N1 vaccine. Are you getting a shot?
Posted: 11/18/2009 10:45:26 AM

What if this 'vest' is full of stones and you know it. Woud you still encourage people to wear one ????
I'd rather wait for other ,safer "devices"....if any (since our 'lifeguards' have seemed to have a pact with devil).
If he 'knew' that then he'd be delusional. And when you ask him how he 'knows' that will be the time when he shows that he doesn't know it, he just believes it, and that his beliefs are based on ignorance instead of evidence. Vaccines kill no one, and they save many. Every million H1N1 vaccines given may elicit nasty side-effects in a few people, but the number of lives saved is far greater.

The lifeguards with their 'pact with the devil' have been giving these 'lifejackets' year after year after year after year preventing countless millions of illness' and deaths. Lets look at the results of these demonic atrocities they cause:

Pediatric immunizations are responsible for preventing 3 million deaths in children each year worldwide.
Bonanni P. (1999) Demographic impact of vaccination: a review. Vaccine. 17(suppl 3) :S120 –S125

Thanks to immunization programs that require children to receive vaccinations, infectious diseases like smallpox and polio have been completely or nearly eradicated in the United States. Rates of most other vaccine-preventable diseases have been reduced by 98% to 99%, and studies have shown that serious side effects of the vaccines are rare.
http://www.thechildrenshospital.org/wellness/info/news/43134.aspx

And did you know that children with parents who refuse immunizations for them are 23 times more likely to get whooping cough? And that is only one of the many benefits of refusing vaccines! We must stop protecting our children and focus more of our time complaining about pharmaceutical because they turn a profit....just like every other company in the world but we won't complain about those ones though.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 96 (view)
 
Circumsision and its woes.
Posted: 11/18/2009 10:18:58 AM
edisto
funny no one responded to my comment that the American Academy of Pediatrics writes:

"Existing scientific evidence demonstrates potential medical benefits of newborn male circumcision; however, these data are not sufficient to recommend routine neonatal circumcision. In circumstances in which there are potential benefits and risks, yet the procedure is not essential to the child's current well-being, parents should determine what is in the best interest of the child. To make an informed choice, parents of all male infants should be given accurate and unbiased information and be provided the opportunity to discuss this decision. If a decision for circumcision is made, procedural analgesia should be provided."...

Its funny no one responded to my post when I wrote:

For every study that says there is less enjoyment of sex for circumcised males I can likely find one that says there is no difference in sexual enjoyment. And some studies say things like...
Adult male circumcision was not associated with sexual dysfunction. Circumcised men reported increased penile sensitivity and enhanced ease of reaching orgasm."
Krieger, JN; Mehta SD, Bailey RC, Agot K, Ndinya-Achola JO, Parker C, Moses S (August 2008). "Adult Male Circumcision: Effects on Sexual Function and Sexual Satisfaction in Kisumu, Kenya". The Journal of Sexual Medicine

As for health, foreskin harbors bacteria and viruses, therefore circumcision has health benefits. In addition to those already mentioned, circumcision can greatly reduce the incidence of HIV.

Experimental evidence was needed to establish a causal relationship between lack of circumcision and HIV, so three randomized controlled trials were commissioned as a means to reduce the effect of any confounding factors.[147] Trials took place in South Africa,[148] Kenya[149] and Uganda.[150] All three trials were stopped early by their monitoring boards on ethical grounds, because those in the circumcised group had a lower rate of HIV contraction than the control group.[149] The results showed that circumcision reduced vaginal-to-penile transmission of HIV by 60%, 53%, and 51%, respectively. ~wiki


Ultimately there are benefits and risks as well as contrasting literature on whether or not it results in more or less pleasure during sex.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 587 (view)
 
New Swine Flu vaccine is dangerous business
Posted: 11/18/2009 10:11:32 AM

lets ask the 6.6 million in 5 years from now after the flu is gone.
Heck, we can do that now by asking the 6.6 million people who got vaccinated in 2001 or 2002 or 2003 and so on. Any side effects they had are likely long forgotten and they're probably thankful for the vaccine since they weren't one of the millions who got sick or the hundreds that died.

I love how easily you dismiss 198 deaths as being so trivial, yet those 36 who had side-effects are OMG what a tragedy!

But I suppose that's the rationale you need to have to be an anti-vax person - you need to see deaths as a good thing and side-effects as a bad thing.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 16 (view)
 
What is the source of our questions ?
Posted: 11/17/2009 10:00:53 PM
perhaps its an innate sense of curiosity
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 70 (view)
 
H1N1 vaccine. Are you getting a shot?
Posted: 11/17/2009 12:38:55 PM
I was told a few times that they don't turn anyone away, regardless of whatever groups they're providing shots to that day.
Besides, if in doubt you could say someone in your household is immunocompromised. ;)

I've heard from a few people with H1N1 that its the worst flu they ever had.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 583 (view)
 
New Swine Flu vaccine is dangerous business
Posted: 11/17/2009 11:33:25 AM
earthpuppy

Why have humans survived and thrived for millions of years without pharmaceutical companies dictating the rules?
I believe that humans have been around for about 100,oooyrs to 200,000 yrs, depending on the flexibility of your definition of 'human.' During that time we were ravaged by disease and enjoyed a life expectancy less than half what we have now. Pharmaceutical companies dictate the rules? - lol.
Why are viruses evolving more rapidly than ever before and re-combining in ways unseen in our recent history?
What makes you think they're evolving more rapidly? What do you mean by recombining?
Why are our immune systems self-destructing?
This question is ironic considering that humans today are the healthiest that they've ever been.
Apparently you miss the good ol days where people died of old age when they were around 30yrs old.
Why are we being force-fed GMO foods?
People have been holding you down and forcing you to eat? That's horrible!
I suppose we could get rid of GM foods if we wanted lesser yields, less healthy food, and an increased need for pesticides.
What effects have pesticides and other man-made poisons had on our immune systems?
They're the best they've ever been.
How sustainable for the species are these trends in the long run?
What trends? Having more and better foods to eat? Being more resistant to disease? Seems to be helping so far.
If numbers are the sole measure of success as a species, why do most other populations of creatures on earth crash when the numbers and density become too much for the ecosystem to support?
You measure success with numbers? What about health and quality of life?
Your second question seems to be asking why populations are limited by available resources, which is self-evident.
If we wipe out synergistic and vital biodiversity, all the canaries in our coal mine, how does this portend for our future as a species?
I suppose if we decided to wipe out our biodiversity, that would lead to serious problems. But how is that relevant to the conversation?

Why do anti-vax people whine so much about pharmaceutical companies? "Oh wahh, they make money, boo hoo." Unlike every other company on earth apparently - lol.
Oh well, if they don't care about protecting themselves or their children that's their choice I suppose. I care more about my family than I do about spreading lies and whining about pharma companies, so I make responsible, healthy decisions.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 7 (view)
 
Choosing the Perfect Gift!
Posted: 11/16/2009 2:55:59 PM
Strangely, all the ones on my christmas list that are hard to buy just so happen to be all the ones who don't drink alcohol.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 573 (view)
 
New Swine Flu vaccine is dangerous business
Posted: 11/16/2009 2:52:27 PM

I think the rest of the folks on this thread are interested in finding out the truth about vaccines.
Great! Lets explore that truth together then.

There is about a one in a million chance of having a severe allergic reaction to the H1N1 vaccine. I wouldn't be surprised if there is a higher risk of severe allergic reaction to eatting a piece of fruit. Less severe reactions - such as aches, a sore shoulder, and fever, are fairly common. So that's the risks.
The benefits: it prevents H1N1 influenza in a majority of the ones getting the vax which would have led to death and disease in many of them. Every million people vaccinated correlates to saving hundreds of lives that would have been lost to the virus, as well as preventing thousands from getting ill. Therefore, the benefits massively outweigh the risks.

As for vaccines in general, here's some info:
Pediatric immunizations are responsible for preventing 3 million deaths in children each year worldwide.
Bonanni P. (1999) Demographic impact of vaccination: a review. Vaccine. 17(suppl 3) :S120 –S125

Thanks to immunization programs that require children to receive vaccinations, infectious diseases like smallpox and polio have been completely or nearly eradicated in the United States. Rates of most other vaccine-preventable diseases have been reduced by 98% to 99%, and studies have shown that serious side effects of the vaccines are rare.
http://www.thechildrenshospital.org/wellness/info/news/43134.aspx

Ironically, the fact that vaccines are so effective is one of the reasons that they are so underappreciated. We often forget the devastating effects of polio, smallpox, measles, and other vaccine-preventable diseases. Even as vaccines save millions of lives each year - we can't physically see these benefits unless we are objective enough to acknowledge the decreasing rates of illness. But if one person gets a serious side-effect, that is immediately obvious and plain to see.

Websites that are critical of vaccines are common. A previous post mentioned some Dr.Tenpenny website that states that vaccines are not even effective. Its very obvious that they are effective if you have the courage to look - for example, children with parents who refuse immunizations for them are 23 times more likely to get whooping cough. Is that a coincidence? Is it a coincidence that we are no longer ravaged by polio and smallpox? Hardly.

I proudly support people who spread the truth about vaccines. But the anti-vax crowd has spread nothing but lies on this thread - which results in fear and ignorance that costs lives. If you want to spread truth - then explore all sides of the issue honestly and objectively. Doing nothing but pointing out only the side-effects or making up imaginary connections to autism/guillain barre/etc with no evidence to support that is not objective nor honest. If you spread lies that cause death - that IS monstrous. /my opinion.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 70 (view)
 
Assisted suicide - the right to die with dignity
Posted: 11/16/2009 2:16:26 PM
The last episode of House touched on this issue too.
At one time I felt that health care workers should try to save everybody. More and more I realize how barbaric that is in some cases - I am often horrified at the long, slow, tortuous agony that some patients endure - their bodies kept alive by chemicals and machines which reduces the human experience to little more than inflicting pain and removing dignity.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 5 (view)
 
Commonly Held Beliefs?
Posted: 11/16/2009 2:06:29 PM
Everybody dies. That seems to be universally held.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 35 (view)
 
Circumsision and its woes.
Posted: 11/16/2009 8:48:08 AM
And then there was the rabbi who didn't charge a fee for circumcision...
...he only took tips.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 558 (view)
 
New Swine Flu vaccine is dangerous business
Posted: 11/15/2009 9:01:15 PM

Va teen develops Guillain Bare hours after SF Shot (MSNBC):

www.msnbc.com/id/33845867/ns/health-cold_and_flu/

-Oh--and of course!! the CDC claims this is not from the vax!! Total BS!!
If it was caused by the vax, that makes you a monster who finds death acceptable and guillain barre syndrome unacceptable.
Vaccines save lives. So if you make two more comments about side-effects, or 5 more, or ten more, go ahead - because what you are saying that we should stop saving lives because people might have a fever, a sore arm, temporary paralysis, aches, etc.

Its mindblowing that anti-vax people don't realize the silliness of their arguments. Even toddlers should realize that people are dying is a bad thing, but anti-vax fundies dont.
Unsurprisingly, that link to msnbc said nothing about some teen with guillain bare. Not that it matters - if she stubbed her toe on a rock you would have blamed that on the vaccine too. Apparently if someone gets a vaccine and if anything negative at all whatsoever happens to them any time after that, its the vaccine's fault.


Incidentally, guillain barre appears to be sometimes caused by the flu - so flu vaccines may actually prevent some cases of that condition as well.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 553 (view)
 
New Swine Flu vaccine is dangerous business
Posted: 11/15/2009 6:30:08 PM

^^^this is fear based again... when you start hanging around people who eat healthy and who do not take meds and who do not get shots they are not spewing mucous, they are the epitome of health, bright eyes, nice dispositions, their children sparkle<<< this is a huge part of the proof, Living Truth on the matter.... blessings
And this is more of the delusional bullsh*t nonsense and generalizations that we've come to expect.
Healthy eatting is great, but it doesn't guarantee health, bright eyes, nice dispositions, or sparkly children.

And since it partly relates to one of ideoform's latest deceptive claims I'll mention that here too and address them together.
The fact is that vaccination does NOT stop you from carrying bacteria or viruses in your nose, in your throat, in your intestines, in your airway, on your skin, or in your body.

But many do not understand the significance of this fact, and have been made to believe that if you’re vaccinated, you won’t carry viruses, and therefore, others will be protected because you’re vaccinated.

So true, it doesn't prevent you from carrying viruses. Nobody claims it did. The purpose of this claim is to imply that someone who is vaccinated is just as likely to infect others as someone who wasn't. The reason that's BS is because people that succumb to (for example) a flu and are coughing and sneezing and snotting all over the place are obviously going to spread illness more than someone who is immunized and not displaying these symptoms. There's a big difference between an immunized person with a few viral particles on their sleeve and a non-immunized person who is sick and their body is producing viruses by the billion and spewing them all over the place.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 32 (view)
 
How important is having Internet access to you?
Posted: 11/15/2009 12:51:40 AM
I havent had cable television in about six months. Don't miss it at all.
But if anyone messes with my internet connection I will hunt them down and kill them without hesitation.
Yeah that's right Telus, I'm lookin at you...
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 173 (view)
 
Has God always existed?
Posted: 11/15/2009 12:47:13 AM

Man tortured and crucified Jesus.
Ah yes, and the all-knowing God knew that would happen though didn't He? And luckily He was there to...do nothing and watch I guess. Perhaps He was busy that day.
And after His only son was tortured and killed, that made Him so happy that He started letting people go to heaven. For some sick reason He apparently decided that His son's life was needed for atonement. He could have just given it without Jesus' death but He wanted Jesus dead, just because.
What a great story.

Perhaps God did write the bible. If it was written entirely by men then they would have done a better job.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 24 (view)
 
Circumsision and its woes.
Posted: 11/15/2009 12:29:13 AM
You accused them of child abuse and baby mutilation and for some reason they are pissed at you. Gee I wonder why.

To stick your nose in someone else's business and voice an opinion on a sensitive issue in such a harsh way, what did you expect? And if you try to justify why it was okay to say it, that makes it twice as offensive to them.

For every study that says there is less enjoyment of sex for circumcised males I can likely find one that says there is no difference in sexual enjoyment. And some studies say things like...
Adult male circumcision was not associated with sexual dysfunction. Circumcised men reported increased penile sensitivity and enhanced ease of reaching orgasm."
Krieger, JN; Mehta SD, Bailey RC, Agot K, Ndinya-Achola JO, Parker C, Moses S (August 2008). "Adult Male Circumcision: Effects on Sexual Function and Sexual Satisfaction in Kisumu, Kenya". The Journal of Sexual Medicine

As for health, foreskin harbors bacteria and viruses, therefore circumcision has health benefits. In addition to those already mentioned, circumcision can greatly reduce the incidence of HIV.
Experimental evidence was needed to establish a causal relationship between lack of circumcision and HIV, so three randomized controlled trials were commissioned as a means to reduce the effect of any confounding factors.[147] Trials took place in South Africa,[148] Kenya[149] and Uganda.[150] All three trials were stopped early by their monitoring boards on ethical grounds, because those in the circumcised group had a lower rate of HIV contraction than the control group.[149] The results showed that circumcision reduced vaginal-to-penile transmission of HIV by 60%, 53%, and 51%, respectively.
~wiki
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 168 (view)
 
Has God always existed?
Posted: 11/14/2009 11:59:56 PM

^^^ God is Compassionate, He sent His Son ...
...to be tortured and killed. But in a loving, compassionate way I'm sure.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 539 (view)
 
New Swine Flu vaccine is dangerous business
Posted: 11/14/2009 11:26:00 PM
I think that the greatest support for vaccines on this thread is demonstrated by how blatantly dishonest the anti-vaccine fundies are. Some of the last handful of replies are so shockingly ignorant and idiotic that I wonder if these people are serious or if they are actually supporters of vaccine that are merely posing to make anti-vax people look bad.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 528 (view)
 
New Swine Flu vaccine is dangerous business
Posted: 11/14/2009 3:31:45 PM
I don't know what the trends are for vaccine scars. I would guess the size of the scar could depend on a lot of factors such as how the vaccine is given (ie into muscle, intradermal, transdermal, subcutaneous, puncture, etc), the properties of the vaccine, and the physiology of the person getting it. For those who were around to get smallpox vaccines, they were administered using a two pronged needle that was poked into the skin multiple times - that sounds like the kind of thing that would leave a hefty scar.
/Just speculating.

Naissance Man
The irrationality against contracting the flu can be equated to the same irrationality of contracting illness from the vaccine. Why put yourself in the position?
Are you really asking why should we put ourselves in the position of protecting ourselves and loved ones instead of leaving them vulnerable?
On one hand, you have something natural. On another, you have something unnatural.
Natural is good.
Natural is living in grass huts and watching people die of smallpox and type 1 diabetes and other preventable or treatable illness and disease, natural is having a life expectancy of about 30yrs. Unnatural is having the ability to protect ourselves, surviving most illnesses, and benefiting from advancements such as the computer you're looking at right now, and having a life expectancy that more than doubles the 'natural' and 'good' way of life.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 169 (view)
 
POF Lessons
Posted: 11/13/2009 12:03:33 AM
I've learned that its easier to find someone when I stop feeling sorry for myself and stop making lame excuses for why I couldn't find someone (excuses that invariably blame the opposite gender instead of admitting the truth when it is my own shortcomings that are to blame).
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 127 (view)
 
What to do with old wedding rings?
Posted: 11/12/2009 11:58:22 PM
pawn them....for beer.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 29 (view)
 
mma(mixed martial arts) coming to Vancouver, what do you think?
Posted: 11/12/2009 11:57:27 PM

thot would post comment on this discussing seeing that no one here acculty does martial arts.

I'm into grappling mostly but have dabbled in others.

Are you ready?....Are YOU ready?....LETS BRING IT ON!
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 512 (view)
 
New Swine Flu vaccine is dangerous business
Posted: 11/12/2009 11:42:48 PM

yep, just like how people who have never examined Desiree Jennings claim her dystonia is a hoax when she was examined by 60 Dr's who agreed she had dystonia and it was caused bvy the vaccine. I agree-misinformation is eveywhere!
Yeah right. I can just imagine her now, after somehow finding 50 doctors to diagnose her and all of them agreeing that it was dystonia, she finds herself confused and decides hmmm...every doctor says its dystonia so what it could be? ...better find 10 more doctors to the say the same thing and then I'll be sure.


I don't know what surprises me more - the fact that people try so hard to discourage vaccines that save lives, the fact that they actually think that one person getting an uncomfortable condition for a while is worse than deaths from flu that could have been prevented, or the fact that they are willing to lie so blatantly to accomplish their goal of discouraging others from protecting themselves and their loved ones.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 479 (view)
 
It takes faith to believe in science - I'd say no.
Posted: 11/12/2009 11:34:11 PM
After some consideration, I figure that many people take science on faith.

And many don't.

You certainly don't have to take science on faith. When you can form beliefs from observation and analysis, faith is unneccessary.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 55 (view)
 
H1N1 vaccine. Are you getting a shot?
Posted: 11/10/2009 9:28:14 AM
I've got nothing against those who choose not to get the flu, so long as they don't make idiotic claims and spread panic. In another thread there's claims about vaccines causing autism, gulf war syndrome, pharma companies made the virus and released it in order to vaccinate us against it, and one conspiracy after another.

Fortunately, BCers seem to be of a higher calibre. *tips hat*
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 457 (view)
 
New Swine Flu vaccine is dangerous business
Posted: 11/9/2009 1:09:38 PM

If you are a manufacturer of vaccines, how to you increase your sales?
They could make attenuated vaccines, which essentially make you immune to the virus but capable of passing it on to others who aren't.
Personally I'd avoid the H1N1 vaccine nasal spray because of this.
Asperger's his harder to diagnose than Autism.
Aspergers IS autism. OMG how many times does it take for you to be told this before it sinks in.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 452 (view)
 
New Swine Flu vaccine is dangerous business
Posted: 11/9/2009 10:43:41 AM
Wow, I'm impressed by the high calibre posts lately from both sides of the debate (yes, you too ideoform). Frogo and stargazer always do great posts, but sls177 has been particularly impressive I must say.

Autism has a genetic component.
I agree.
I have not come on this thread to blame vaccines for all cases of Autism.
Fair enough. Perhaps you don't blame vaccines for all cases of autism, but you are clearly blaming vaccines for some cases of autism - and unfounded claims like those are harmful to society. Furthermore, you are either repeatedly missing the point of why there is no causal relationship between vaccines and your personal experience with autism, or your emotional investment has stripped your objectivity away from reaching a reasoned opinion.
Essentially, you realized your son had autism one day - then you looked around for something to blame, you picked vaccines, and now nothing will change your mind. If your son wore sneakers that day you could have blamed the sneakers, if he wore a different hairstyle that day you could have blamed the hairstyle, and if he started watching a new tv show that day you could have blamed the tv show - but no, you decided that vaccines are the culprit, based on nothing more than...gee, well, it happened around the same time so....

In my opinion, a vaccine is not, in the strictest sense, a medical product since it is meant for well people.
Its a prophylactic (any medical or public health procedure whose purpose is to prevent, rather than treat or cure a disease) and is most definately a medical product.
Particularly a vaccine that is hastily made in truly massive quantities by a company that might have released the disease...
By a company that might have released the disease? Again you spread harmful panic with no evidence to back it up. If I spread rumors about how your boyfriend might be a child molester or that you might be abusing your son, you might soon realize how harmful it is to spread unfounded rumors, even if they are qualified with the term 'might.'
In a sense, every flu vaccine is "hastily made." If we spent 10 years studying the effects of the vaccines that were effective for last years flu before releasing it to the general population, then that vaccine would be given 10 years too late.
For centuries people have used fear and controversy (i.e., gossip) as a marketing tool. Just look at this thread alone. Free "exposure."
And you are the biggest contributor to spreading fear and controversy on this thread.
I know several people with Asperger's who can't get a diagnosis of Autism. Even Asperger's syndrome is difficult to get as a diagnosis
That's strange - earlier on you said that autism "is obvious." He should have no problem getting a diagnosis then, hmm?

For those of you who refuse vaccines because big pharmaceutical companies make a lot of money, thank you for no longer buying clothes or driving cars since they are certainly not made from non-profit organizations.

For those of you who think refusing vaccines "protects your kids," great job in protecting your kids from a sore arm or a mild fever while leaving them vulnerable to a far more severe illness and possibly death.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 438 (view)
 
New Swine Flu vaccine is dangerous business
Posted: 11/8/2009 11:32:45 PM

Why are you so defensive about this as to bring your cat into this discussion?
Because my cat is awesome. She deserves to be brought into every discussion. ...just kidding.
You tried to legitimize Wakefield's atrocities by falsely crediting him with your son's improvements. Wakefield is a guy who made kids sick for money - and even if he was to credit for the DAN protocol (which I HIGHLY doubt) that still makes him a bastard who hurt kids for money.
I strongly suggest that you look into the available biological treatments for Autism. There are many that you could try with him that might relieve some of his mental and physical pain.
I have tried many things with him, but he's tough to get through to. His IQ is about 45 or so, and autism is only one piece of the puzzle of illnesses that are plaguing him. He seems pretty much impervious to behavioral therapy. Dietary changes help tho. And changing his environment seems to have a positive effect - right now he's enjoying my mini-trampoline - he likes the feeling of weightlessness (he loves to swing too - and he's 54).

How do you know that the people accusing Wakefield aren't the ones lying?
The one who shows that Wakefield is a liar (and more especially, a deceiver) is Wakefield himself. His own research and ill-formed conclusions tell the tale.
When you say that Autism can be subtle, what you are referring to is that the diagnosis of Autism is made on the basis of observation of behaviors in the absence of the definitive knowledge of what actually causes it.
Mostly I said it because it can be subtle.
Until we know what causes Autism, we can't really definitively test for it.
In one breath you admit that the cause(s) of autism is unknown, in the next breath you say vaccines cause autism. You can't have it both ways.

A high fever can cause seizures. High fevers and seizures can cause regression. Regression in the area of language and social skills is diagnosed as Autism.
And now you're saying that fevers cause autism. You're just getting ridiculous now.
Following your ridiculous reasoning though - since fevers cause autism, and H1N1 causes fever, then the H1N1 vaccine is now a cure for autism. Hooray!
Regression in the area of language and social skills is diagnosed as Autism. This is a common pattern that parents of Autistic children usually describe when they talk to me about their child's medical history.
That's a common theme that I hear too. But blaming it on vaccines is no different than blaming it on their running shoes, their denim jeans, or television. You noticed your son's regression around the time he had a vaccination, so you blamed the vaccination. Sadly, the stage where autism is so often identified also happens to be the same time of a child's life when they get their childhood vaccine, so you are not alone on that one.

It simply makes no sense to think that a vaccine causes autism. Take for example the fact that siblings of those with autism are 25 times more likely to have autism than the general population - this clearly shows a genetic component to the cause of autism, not a vaccine one. The vaccine didn't go through your child's 30 trillion or so cells and change the DNA in each of them to make him autistic. Your child had autism before he left the womb, you just didnt know it yet.

And the more you blame vaccines the more you contribute to the panic that leads to reduced immunization rates which leads to outbreaks of flu, measles, etc and deaths, and the more you spiral down the path of denial. Sometimes bad things just happen.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 402 (view)
 
New Swine Flu vaccine is dangerous business
Posted: 11/7/2009 8:28:30 AM

I think that the pressure and vilification he received about his research is very sad. This discourages innovation. His motivation was not to make a lot of money suing people. His motivation was to help.
Wrong. His motivation was to help himself get paid £400,000 from those who were trying to sue a vaccine company and he earned that money by lying his ass off. His lies reduced vaccine rates which made kids sick - its disconcerting that being a liar and making kids sick needlessly doesn't stop you from admiring this guy .
It seems strange that medical professionals don't listen to lay people until they have it happen to their own families.
It seems strange that you believe that.
I went to see the local DAN doctor, and at that time, seeing the results he had with his own son, I put my son on the treatments, and he got better.
That's great, but irrelevant. And Wakefield had about as much to do with those treatments as my cat did. Interventions such as behavioural therapy and removing casein and gluten from the diet can do wonders, but your child didn't get better because of Wakefield's deceiving study.
The increased rates of Autism are not from increased awareness. Autism was so rare that they didn't teach about it to Doctors in medical school...
Listen to what you're saying. If they didn't teach it to doctors then doctors wouldn't diagnose people with it now would they, heh heh.
And now that they do teach it more that has resulted in...wait for it...wait a little more...increased awareness!
Autism doesn't need a lot of knowledge to "detect" it -- is pretty obvious.
Wrong again. You seriously think every case of autism is "obvious?" How unfortunate that after having a child born with autism, that you haven't had the time to learn about the condition. Autism can be subtle or severe, and anything in between. There are even two posters on these forums that I know have autism, both of whom are very intelligent, and your average person could probably spend a year with either of them and not realize they had any kind of condition. Another reason it can be subtle is when its present among other existing conditions - one client I look after is autistic, bipolar, developmentally disabled, and has OCD (omg I think OCD is the nastiest one - this poor guy is in mental agony) so detecting the autism amongst the other conditions would not have been easy.
My son got the MMR. (So did I.) He developed a high fever and lost all language within a week.
The vaccine is likely responsible for the fever, but not the language deficit. Its quite common for autistic kids to regress.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 466 (view)
 
It takes faith to believe in science - I'd say no.
Posted: 11/7/2009 7:46:42 AM

Hell, offer up anyone at the Discovery Institute. I'm not a creationist, I follow this movement closely and I don't see what you're claiming. If they were I'd be on the front row shouting it down. Personal motives don't count. Show me where a leading ID proponent is using ID arguments as some sort of justification to accept Biblical creationist theology, particularly the literal six-day creation story.
Our strategy has been to change the subject a bit so that we can get the issue of intelligent design, which really means the reality of God, before the academic world and into the schools....Philip E. Johnson.

Get the Bible and the Book of Genesis out of the debate because you do not want to raise the so-called Bible-science dichotomy. Phrase the argument in such a way that you can get it heard in the secular academy and in a way that tends to unify the religious dissenters. That means concentrating on, "Do you need a Creator to do the creating, or can nature do it on its own?" and refusing to get sidetracked onto other issues, which people are always trying to do." Philip E. Johnson
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 377 (view)
 
New Swine Flu vaccine is dangerous business
Posted: 11/5/2009 11:12:58 AM
Ideoform
And Autism is so prevalent now that it is getting hard to ignore this type of vaccination side-effect.
The idea that vaccines cause autism began with a study led by Dr. Andrew Wakefield. He performed the study with 12 other authors who were unaware that Wakefield was being paid by 12 parents of autistic children who were trying to sue manufacturers of the MMR vaccine - when this information came to light, Wakefield's obvious conflict of interest was revealed and he was charged with professional misconduct. Essentially, these 12 parents believed MMR caused their childrens' autism and they paid Wakefield to rig a study to support that idea.

He is also guilty of falsifying data, data fixing, and scientific misconduct, and his conclusions resulted in a large drop in MMR immunizations which naturally led to increased incidence of illness. 10 of the other 12 authors of the study quickly retracted their support and exclaimed "We wish to make it clear that in this paper no causal link was established between (the) vaccine and autism, as the data were insufficient. However the possibility of such a link was raised, and consequent events have had major implications for public health. In view of this, we consider now is the appropriate time that we should together formally retract the interpretation placed upon these findings in the paper, according to precedent."

As for the 'evidence' that supports the idea that vaccines cause autism, I think earthpuppy's post #360 summarizes it nicely.
•1940s and 50s - Autism was primarily diagnosed in upper and upper-middle class families, those who could afford vaccinations.
•1970s and 80s - The U.S. government set vaccination goal rates, targeting approximately 97% of the population vaccinated. Federal grants and strict enforcement guidelines were implemented
•Before the 1980s, only eight vaccines were mandated.
•Early 1990s -Autism rates are listed as 1 in 10,000
•By 2000, the number of required vaccines increased to 22
•Early 2000, 1 in 150 children diagnosed with autism
•Since 1997, according to the CDC (Center for Disease Control) diagnosed ADHD increased at a rate of three percent per year. By 2006, the number of children aged 5-17 with ADHD was more than 4.5 million in the U.S.
•By 2009, the number of mandated vaccines has risen to 30, most of which are given in the first 18 months of a child's life.
•One in 91 children diagnosed with autism in 2009
The first point shows that in the 1940's and 1950's, autism was mainly diagnosed in families that could afford to have their members diagnosed for things. No mystery there.

The following points show that incidence of autism rose and incidence of vaccinations also rose. Similarly, the amount of bubble gum being manufactured rose, cell phone usage rose, and the number of pirates in the world fell. This shows that autism is caused by vaccines, bubble gum, and cell phones, and the inverse correlation with pirates show that pirates actually prevent autism - more research is required to examine the curative properties that piracy has on autism.
- and yes....that was sarcasm.
In case you missed it, the preceding paragraph is meant to show how flawed the reasoning is to show a relationship that is not a causal relationship.

The reason for an increase in rates of autism is not so much that it occurs more often, its mainly because of increased awareness and changing diagnostic criteria. Essentially, since we are so much more knowledgeable about autism than we were a few decades ago, we are far more able to detect it and diagnose it. Naturally, an increased ability to detect a condition makes it appear as though it occurs more often.

I imagine that you, and those parents that paid Wakefield to rig a study, find it easier to accept when you have some demon to blame for the autism in your child - and vaccines are an easy target to place the blame. Unfortunately, research shows that vaccines don't cause autism and those who continue to blame vaccines for whatever reason will continue to do real harm to countless people.

As for vaccines in general - do they have risks? And do they have side-effects in some people? Absolutely! But that doesn't change the fact that the benefits greatly outweigh the risks.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 369 (view)
 
New Swine Flu vaccine is dangerous business
Posted: 11/4/2009 12:44:58 PM
Summary of the argument from the anti-H1n1-vaccine crowd:

Although this vaccine will surely save hundreds or thousands of lives, we should not save these lives...because I have this friend who got a side-effect from it once. Now lets get out there and spread panic and doubt because having a sore arm or whatever is way worse than numerous needless deaths.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 330 (view)
 
New Swine Flu vaccine is dangerous business
Posted: 11/3/2009 11:44:47 AM
Wiyan
1. (to a healthcare worker there, or active politician) as NSLass and others have noted, you are short of vaccines-but, didn't the Can gov't already prepay the vax? Or is this really explained by the egg development story (taking longer to produce, and all prepaid orders for vax will indeed be filled??).
I'm not sure if it was mentioned yet that GSK (the company producing the vaccine) fell behind when it was called upon to make a special unadjuvanated vaccine for pregnant women. Even taking that into consideration tho, they do seem to have overstated how fast they could produce the vaccine.
2. (To anyone intimately involved with olympic athlete issues-trainers maybe?) How come if there is such a huge pandemic in Canada right now, the B.C. gov't is openly declaring a pandemic all day long in the news and yet NOT cancelling the winter olympics? Aren't they concerned about negative pr, or, people getting sick? Thanks for any knowledge shared-Wiyan
When a province spends over 6 billion on the olympics, they don't cancel it because some people get the flu.

I just did 12-hour shifts on the paediatrics floor the last 3 days - half the kids there have H1n1 and it elicits no more concern than any other flu. Considering that some of my patients had MRSA, an illness like H1n1 is kind of a joke.
Great post Earth Puppy!
Really? Lets take a look....
earthpuppy
Somehow, I still find it difficult to understand how humans as a species, cannot survive without man-made chemical inputs for things like flu viruses.
You're right...medicines don't really help anyone.
The smallpox vaccine likely prevented somewhere around a billion deaths last century - should we complain about that vaccine too?
Or, the only way we can have food is because it's not suffering from a pesticide deficiency.
And having food to eat doesn't help either it seems.
Another scientific discovery you can complain about is the Haber-process. Just think, one guy's discovery now feeds 1/3 of the entire planet. That's gotta be worth an earthpuppyish comment such as "and the only way we can have food is because of fertilizer" don'tcha think?
Its hard to imagine what merit you see in this argument. You're essentially taking the benefits of science for granted then complaining about those benefits. Thats hypocritical.

Tamaflu resistance grew from 12% last year to 100% with this year's H1N1 virus.
As of October 2009, only 39 out of over 10,000 samples of 2009 pandemic H1N1 flu tested worldwide have shown resistance to Tamiflu. 39/10000 does not equal 100%. Its closer to 0.4%
To date, 39 resistant pandemic H1N1 influenza viruses have been detected and characterized worldwide...Worldwide, more than 10,000 clinical specimens (samples and isolates) of the pandemic H1N1 virus have been tested and found to be sensitive to oseltamivir . (Oseltamivir is Tamiflu) ~World Health Organization
http://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/laboratory23_10_2009/en/index.html
The 1976 vaccine debacle and GWS ...
This attempt to discredit vaccines because of the supposed connection between squalene and Gulf War Syndrome is...well...entertaining I suppose. Here's a summary of how this silly idea came about.
One study found that deployed Persian Gulf War Syndrome patients are significantly more likely to have antibodies to squalene than asymptomatic Gulf War veterans. (Incidentally, the vaccine in question was a vaccination against anthrax). The undiscerning crowd of anti-vaccine fundies were undeterred by the study's concluding statement: "It is important to note that our laboratory-based investigations do not establish that squalene was added as adjuvant to any vaccine used in military or other personnel who served in the Persian Gulf War era."
Laughably, and perhaps predictably, the anthrax vaccine did not use squalene - which I find hilarious. What an awesome study that was, lol.
The WHO states that squalene has been present in over 22 million flu vaccines given to patients in Europe since 1997 and there have never been significant vaccine-related adverse events.
The body makes squalene. If it got on our skin, it would help moisturize it. If its injected in our blood, it helps to synthesize cholesterol, vitamin D, and steroid hormones. Naturally, a helpful substance like this is quickly branded by the anti-vaccine crowd as a neurotoxin.

Earthpuppy, I wish you luck on your campaign against humanity as well as continued success on remaining blissfully unaware of the monstrosity of your actions in spreading panic, fear, and lies about life-saving vaccines. Feel free to keep ignoring what the WHO and CDC has to say (since they're honest and try to save lives instead of end them).
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 4 (view)
 
H1N1 vaccine. Are you getting a shot?
Posted: 10/29/2009 2:25:52 PM
Yes, absolutely, there's no reason not to.

So far there's been 12 H1n1 deaths in BC. http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/alert-alerte/h1n1/surveillance-eng.php

There's a wave of H1N1 sweeping across the nation right now so why not get vaccinated?
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 20 (view)
 
Grandmothers as our evolutionary secret weapon
Posted: 10/29/2009 1:39:13 AM
Old women seem rather renowned for passing down wisdom in nearly every society.

On a side-note, The other day I was reading about Korean women divers who dive for abalone and sea urchins.

And there’s no need for the oxygen tanks that divers usually carry on their backs. Kang can hold her breath for a remarkable 10 minutes when underwater....Kang is one of 5,000 women divers in 100 coastal villages on the island, and she is part of the younger generation, even though she is in her 50s.
“Young women are shunning the profession because it is too much like hard labor,” Choa said. “And now the haenyeo are aging.”
Kang is almost the youngest in her diving crew. Her best friend and diving buddy, Kim Haeng-ja, is 63, considered by experts to be at the best age for haenyeo-like diving.
Among the women divers still working, 34.5 percent are in their 70s, followed by 37.9 percent in their 60s, according to a recent survey conducted by the local government. Only 17.6 percent are in their 50s, and the numbers start to decrease in the lower age brackets. The 40-something women divers only make up 8.8 percent and the 30-somethings make up barely one percent.

http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2882495
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 264 (view)
 
New Swine Flu vaccine is dangerous business
Posted: 10/29/2009 1:30:12 AM
If a vaccine saves a million lives and gives one person a runny nose, there will always be those who cry out to avoid the deadly runny-nose vaccine. Conspiracy, conspiracy, conspiracy.
In my line of work I have to take the vaccine, but I would have anyway.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 284 (view)
 
Kirk Cameron compares Charles Darwin to Hitler!
Posted: 10/29/2009 1:17:26 AM
rococco
Ask yourselves who today is acting most like the Third Reich in demanding for removal of religious artifacts from schools...
Well if there were non-christian artifacts in schools, christians would surely be the first in line for having them removed. There's no reason to put religious artifacts in public schools.
and imposing secular belief systems...
I'm sorry to hear you have this paranoid delusion. Feel free to pretend its true if it helps you through the day.
These types of problems are solved with RESPECT
Now this we can agree on.

raphael_adroit_esquire
People are also addicted to the condescending feeling of "I know more than you" that science grants. If you want proof, just look around this board.
What I often see on these boards is people who spout lies as though they are facts and cry victim when they are shown to be wrong. Its as though they expect people to thank them for lying and lacking the integrity to admit error - and if someone extends them the courtesy of educating them and pointing out the evidence to support the truth, they get offended.

When my errors are pointed out, I don't cry and whine about some supposed condescending tone, I examine my beliefs and adjust them in accordance with reason and analysis. Anyone who refuses to ever alter their beliefs in light of such things are embracing ignorance. If someone corrects you and backs it up, don't feel slighted, feel grateful.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 417 (view)
 
It takes faith to believe in science - I'd say no.
Posted: 10/29/2009 12:49:26 AM

If there is an expression that requires more faith, than the expression, "absolutely everything came from absolutely nothing" (big bang theory), I'd love to hear it.

I always get a kick out of it when someone who believes that a magic person casted a spell that created the universe out of nothing accuses and mocks others for believing the universe came from nothing.
Especially since the big bang theory says nothing of the sort. lol
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 264 (view)
 
Kirk Cameron compares Charles Darwin to Hitler!
Posted: 10/23/2009 10:48:37 PM

Evolution itself is quite provable and has been proven time and again.

scorpiomover: OK, prove it. But to proved it, you cannot use ANY jargon to confuse people. So, you cannot use the words "evolution", "genes", "mutation", or any other jargon
Since you're a math guy, tell us the answer to this question: what is 2+2? And don't use ANY jargon to confuse us, such as the number 4.
You must use words that people use themselves in normal conversation outside of evolutionary theory, to avoid you making the obious mistake that happens so often, of blinding people with words they get confused about.
And you must not make the mistake that so many others make, and using any term that is the equivalent of 4 to answer the question.
You have to prove it all, yourself, to the people you are proving to. You cannot quote any source, or state anything as a given that you have not first proved to those people.
And when you answer it, you cannot use anything to do with mathematics until you've proven to everyone everything ever discovered about mathematics. And don't use jargon when you do.

In short, my name is scorpiomover and when I ask questions that I refuse to accept the truth to, I make nonsense rules that take away the person's ability to answer the question.

Evolution is proven when we observe changes in genetic material in biological populations over time. This is a simple truth - even my 8yr old daughter understands it - but then again she isn't constrained by nonsense rules like not using words like "genes". If jargon is a problem for you perhaps you should have someone show you how to look up definitions for words online and in the right context.

Of course, you could prove it's always true, by citing every single case of every change that is intended to accommodate people of all faiths, and cite a link to the relevant protest of the majority of the country, that religion is being removed. Can you do that? If yes, then you're proved your point. If not, then it's only sometimes true, and probably false, just as often.
You could prove your claim that it is probably false just as often by citing every case of every change ever made by every person in every this and every that and every blah blah blah....this is how you make wordy replies with zero substance and is needlessly argumentative.
Try presenting your own case instead of endlessly arguing how someone else presents theirs.

That's called lateral thinking.
Once you start using it, you start realising that everything you assumed was true, is mostly wrong, because it was based on what you were told, and not what you thought.
So for example, there's absolutely no reason to believe China exists unless you've actually been there. We can't just go around accepting hearsay and flimsy evidence of its existence can we? Since I don't have firsthand knowledge of its existence, China is wrong. It clearly does not exist.
What a wonderful tool you've shown that can be used to deny nearly everything.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 59 (view)
 
Are all men potential rapists?
Posted: 10/22/2009 3:33:41 PM
I think the statement "all men are potential rapists" might be blown out of proportion a little. I don't feel that Flynn was implying anything about all men, I think she said it to women to behave cautiously. All men and women are potential rapists in the same way that they are potential international spies or potential diabetics. That isn't suggesting that everyone is a rapist, a spy, or a diabetic - it merely suggests that they could be.

as equals to men in every way — except perhaps when it comes to arm-wrestling and peeing your name in the snow.
Clearly this journalist has never seen a woman squatting in the snow with a stencil of her name underneath her.
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 69 (view)
 
Ok..who likes hairy toes??
Posted: 10/20/2009 10:27:51 AM
My toes aren't hairy but the toenail on my left foot is always misshapen and half-dead. If this is a turn on for anyone, please call me.
lol, j/k
 rockondon
Joined: 2/21/2007
Msg: 244 (view)
 
Kirk Cameron compares Charles Darwin to Hitler!
Posted: 10/20/2009 10:08:40 AM
This thread is filled with irony.

aremeself: how about 'I'm a monkey' shirt.
The reason that humans and apes are in the same taxonomic family is because a christian creationist put us there. His name was Carl Linnaeus, the father of taxonomy.


robeaves: Hang on.....I'm feeling a Gouldian mutation....why yes....I'm sprouting wings so I don't bump my butt when I fall off my motorcycle.....
If you can read him without laughing you've a better suspension of disbelief than I.
robeaves: The fossil record with its abrupt transitions OFFERS NO SUPPORT for gradual change". - Stephen J. Gould (Natural History , June, 1977, p.22)
Its funny how you have so little regard for him in one breath then you quote-mine him to support your argument in the next. Hypocrisy much?


scorpiomover: As for examples, one only has to look at the commitment that people ascribe to Darwin's theory, and the way they see everything as being a part of evolution, that it qualifies under the notion of deism polytheism to be a "god".
The only ones I see who deify Darwin are creationists - its as though they see him as some kind of satanic figure. People who accept evolution on the other hand, generally pay Darwin little mind and consider him only as a figure of slight historical interest. What he did or didn't do or said or didn't say has no impact on the ToE today - its evidence that tells the tale, not the authority of Darwin.
In the science field, the more authority that someone has the more desire there is to refute their work and make a name for yourself. Darwin was right most of the time but some of his claims have been refuted, much to the delight of those doing the refuting. Does that sound like he's being 'deified'? Hardly.

And comparing Histler to Darwin? Hitler was a christian creationist.
"The undermining of the existence of human culture by the destruction of its bearer seems in the eyes of a folkish philosophy the most execrable crime. Anyone who dares to lay hands on the highest image of the Lord commits sacrilege against the benevolent Creator of this miracle and contributes to the expulsion from paradise."


"What we must fight for is to safeguard the existence and reproduction of our race and our people, . . . so that our people may mature for the fulfillment of the mission allotted it by the creator of the universe."

We are a people of different faiths, but we are one. Which faith conquers the other is not the question; rather, the question is whether Christianity stands or falls. … We tolerate no one in our ranks who attacks the ideas of Christianity … in fact our movement is Christian. We are filled with a desire for Catholics and Protestants to discover one another in the deep distress of our own people.
speech in Passau, 27 October 1928, Bundesarchiv Berlin-Zehlendorf, [cited from Richard Steigmann-Gall's The Holy Reich]
The Nazi party supported Christianity and condemned Darwinism, and in 1935, Die Bücherei, the official Nazi journal for lending libraries, published a list of guidelines of works to reject, including:

Writings of a philosophical and social nature whose content deals with the false scientific enlightenment of primitive Darwinism and Monism (Häckel). (Die Bücherei 1935, 279).


 
Show ALL Forums