online dating service
REGISTER | MAIL/PROFILE | HELP | NOW ONLINE | SEARCH | RATING | FORUMS | SUCCESS STORIES

 

     
Posted In Forum:
Home   login   MyForums  
Show ALL Forums  
 
 Author Thread: Love,Quality of life and who pays
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 675 (view)
 
Love,Quality of life and who pays
Posted: 11/23/2009 2:00:04 PM
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I agree with all that you said, Dreams.
I took great offense at the ding bats here that attempt to belittle anyone with a good lifestyle. I was a stay-at-home mom, who did not even do much housework, we had a housekeeper for that. My husband and I both wanted it that way.

When he got home from work the kids turned summersaults and I was there, freshly bathed and perfumed, to make sure his every wish was fulfilled. It was his time to relax in any fashion he chose.

I was then a volunteer tutor teaching English to non-English speaking children, a volunteer swimming coach. I was on the arts council for my community and a member of a number of charitable foundations benefiting children and animals. I know we were generous with out time and money. A hell of a lot more generous than all of these self-righteous, selfish narrow-minded people on here that think only their lifestyles are of value.

The hard working business woman in the above statement is my daughter.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 236 (view)
 
Oh, its to soon to have sex... yah, blah, blah, blaw
Posted: 11/23/2009 1:39:46 PM
OP, I agree with your premise. Additionally I read your profile and admire your honesty. You’ve made clear that you do not want more children and have done something about it so that it is no longer a possibility. Kudos to you on that as well.


Orgasm does not make good sex!

Agreed. Not all persons are sensual. Almost everyone loves an orgasm but not the pathways to it or the aftermath. You can partially gage a persons sensuality even before you partake in the final act; sometimes but not always. It does take the entire act to determine if a person is sensual. If he’s not sensual I’m out of there for sensuality is not something you can teach another. I know some will disagree and say we can all learn new positions or try different things; although I know this is true, it has nothing to do with sensuality.


And for those of you who think sex is such a small thing that total compatibility doesn’t matter, well, your wrong. Sex is a huge deal!

Absolutely……for me, as it is for you. But not for all. For some guys as long as they get to come in her rather than his hand he’s ok with it. And for some women, usually because they are not really into the guy, it is merely submission.


So meet someone, talk a bit, go out a couple times and then f*ck them!

Or even before then.
There was a thread running with yours about sex on first dates; don’t know why but it got deleted. But a lot of woman admitted to doing so and some of us have even married these easy (sic) men.
When chemistry happens for me I give into the rapture of it. I love the feeling of abandonment and lust that it affords me. I want to revel in it…….and I do.
Never have I equated when I have sex with another with our respect for each another.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 134 (view)
 
Circumsision and its woes.
Posted: 11/23/2009 1:32:38 PM
I attended a bris once; I did not want to but we did. Social obligations and such. Another guest there told me the baby was given wine so he was not going to feel pain.

When it was done, the child let out a bloodcurdling scream; as only an infant can do, the type of scream that makes you think the child will die from lack of oxygen.

How can one not feel pain when a part of your flesh is cut off in cold blood?

I was told they do not feel the pain, they forget about it. Against my better judgment I permitted it. Now we have an open wound that is going to be bathed in urine, which irritates painfully, any open flesh.

Truly it is a barbaric rite.


Why the hell is my entire family pissed at me for not being for child abuse? Has the entire world gone ****ing nuts? I must be the only sane one alive.


No, you are not the only one; and I believe you had every right to state your opinion.


JustDukky, you are hilarious. Thanks for the laughs; I needed them as I cringe at the thought of painful rituals performed on innocents.

Scorpiomover, give it a rest. You tend to be sooooooo long-winded; so much so that most of your stuff goes unread. Try editing.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 671 (view)
 
Love,Quality of life and who pays
Posted: 11/23/2009 12:49:51 PM

my newest restriction is....men who have ever been in a relationship with a "non working" woman....is OUT!!! LOL!


Why is it that some persons worry about things that are not likely to ever happen to them.


there were WOMEN posting that any men who are NOT white collar CEO'S (alpha males) then they (those NON CEO men) are lousy lovers, and incapable of having a quality relationship.


Don’t bother going back. No one said this; this poster twists words…as she just did yours.





see that you are the post commander of this thread, you have taken it to "all about money and finances."

Let's get back to that topic at hand. Love...quality of life.

"and who pays" portion of the thread topic.


I believe any life style that is mutually satisfying to the parties involved is all good.
Working moms, stay-at-home moms, women earning more, less; it’s all good.

What I find ignorant and prejudicial are those types that believe they can cast aspersions on others that do not share their way of life; that only their lifestyle is a viable one. What a joke these narrow minded persons are; thank God these persons are no longer acceptable in most of society.

As for feeling secure because you have a home that’s all paid for; delusions. It can be taken away from you in the blink of an eye. One of my aunts, when the country she resided in went communist, had a government official come to her home and tell her the house she owned (free and clear) was too large for just one person; it was going to be turned into a school for boys; so get out. My aunt NEVER relayed this story with bitterness, just matter of fact. Shit happens (my words, not hers).
My grandmother, in the U.S.A., had her home, which had been in her family for generations, commandeered by the government. They needed the land for a military base.

You can loose your job, pension quicker than you can say, bankrupt.

The only secure persons are the heads of global corporations and the kings sitting on oil wells. They run the world; we peons merely serve to insure that they never fail. Why do you think the government has now indebted us, the citizens, to the tune of trillions of dollars? All those trillions of dollars went to corporate heads; the CEOs and Kings have the power to tell governments what to do. Not us, not the people. We no longer tell the government what to do, the government tells us, we do as they please. We lost the right to govern ourselves a long time ago. Insidiously perhaps, for even today most cling to the illusion of “self-government”. Citizens should have listened to Abraham Lincoln 150 years ago who foretold the future for us if we allowed corporations to become all powerful. *stepping off soapbox*

Even though some here attempt to cast aspersions at those that enjoy fineries it is actually they whom are materialistic. They are the selfish ones clinging to the little that they have, afraid to mesh lifestyles with another, less they be taken advantage of. Afraid to marry, God forbid someone should walk away with their junk, afraid to parent for kids cost a bundle. These are the true misers though they thinly disguise it as, “No one is getting my hard earned shit”.

Persons whom know that the only security comes from within can never be poor; that is a state of mind. They know they will survive if only in a different lifestyle. Men whom have had to part with some cash don’t mind. They just make more of it, because they are winners capable of surmounting any circumstance. They do not begrudge supporting their progeny or, in some cases, the kid’s mom.

The fear of losing material stuff will not stave off either getting it taken away or being taken advantage of by another.

I know a hardworking business woman, mother of two, who still gives of her time to worthy charities. Today she is accompanying her client, a famous athlete, in a heart-wrenching endeavor. He has arranged a visit for three children from the, “Make a Wish Foundation” to meet and spend time with him in his home.
A-stay-at home wife recently accompanied her husband, a skilled pediatric surgeon to third world countries. They spent six weeks in these primitive countries; he performing life saving procedures that these impoverished children would not have access to were it not for the generosity of physicians like him. They had to get all sorts of shots, for disease is rampant in these countries; they have to work in sub standard hospitals. Their accommodations, when they venture out to villages, are anything but posh.

The business woman and the stay-at-home wife respect one another; they are both members of several charitable children’s foundations. I doubt that either of them would want anything to do with the narrow-minded ones here whom have the audacity to criticize and attempt to belittle non-working women. What a pitiful joke you all are.

Why don’t these persons that post ad nauseam, you know who you are, devote some time to worthy causes…….it might expand your horizons, enable those blinders to come off.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 609 (view)
 
Love,Quality of life and who pays
Posted: 11/22/2009 1:57:44 AM


We will see if you would be King Awesome.
A face/body pic would help the argument.


LOL! well, I can help you out there...as I've seen several of his pics...and I'd stick $20 bills in his G-string any day of the week! LOL! dirty old woman that I am!


Yikes! I could have done without the visuals of granny grabbing at verity’s crotch…..
And come on, merely $20s?……..Surely he’s worth more than that!
Who’d of thunk bible thumper granny frequents male stripper joints.
No wonder she has to work those long hours - those $20s can add up.

Sometimes when one tries to drive home a point it can come off as bragging.
But the verity and Hugh analogy is not logical. On a deserted island an outcome is quite different than it would be, say, in Hugh’s mansion. Where some may flock to a guy in one circumstance the same persons would, in different circumstances, flock to another man although it’s the same persons in each situation.

All this alpha stuff is bullshit. Many powerful, strong men are not with the most beautiful or strongest women. These men do not need another to bolster their worth or egos. It’s how they got strong and powerful in the first place.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 461 (view)
 
Love,Quality of life and who pays
Posted: 11/16/2009 5:17:25 PM

LOL! Yes, indeed; I did TURN DOWN that weekend on the yacht....LOL! in favor of going to the Indy 500!

Oh puhleeeze; do you have to make everything about you?
No one cares where about your date offers, or for that matter, how much you earn. ROFL…….Only you think so highly of yourself.


things that money CAN NOT buy....like....RESPECT.

Wrong; yet again. Money does garner respect; you would not know that because you’ve not been around moneyed persons. Money=power=respect. Persons admire the wealthy and powerful. I do not make the news; I merely report it – for your enlightenment.


No, actually, anyone with a modicum of intelligence realizes that debate, whether formal or informal employs the use "inoculation" against such dramatizations, thus proving them ineffectual and unreliable.

The only thing you have proven is that you are long winded, a braggart and full of yourself.


Like your assumption that my husband was every humiliated. LOL! Good little Baptist wife that you are....NO, No husband is emasculated by having the epitiome of the Proverbs: 31:10-31 "virtuous woman"

Oh, God; there you go again bible thumping.
The Holier Than Thou forums are that way>>>>>>>.
Given your proclivity for being a know-it-all; the word is epitome; you are welcome.
Truly I was thinking humiliated……and emasculated; all by a little, hardworking bible thumper. Do tell us, did his award for support from you include a sum for his testes? Surely he should have been compensated for his loss


well, quite obviously, you and I are interested in 2 totally different kinds of men

You can say that again. I prefer my men have their manhood intact.
But, you would not know about that.


Well, I suppose that that sea air has damaged your reading ability.…

Yeah, it’s the price I pay for having an ocean as my back yard……


I guess that makes well over 75% of us very trivial (picayune).
Credit goes Splendere for supplying those labels.

Be careful where you attach my moniker; that really is a serious forum violation. The quotation is not from me.
Didn’t you just get combative over the use of your name, Granma boo hoo hoo hoo?


I had clearly stated that "my households combined income was almost TRIPLE of the national average....@($138,726).

WOW; we are so impressed.
You just can’t stop can you? NO ONE CARES about your earnings. Next thing we’ll see is your tax returns.


I bow to your very superior earning capacity.…

As well you should. You are not fooling anyone; you are the one obsessed with money or the lack of it actually. You remind me of the women whom never been given jewels and furs, when seeing another sporting same says, “I just hate jewelry”. We all know it is envy, the little green monster attempting to put down what she desires but cannot have.



who almost always have their own 'lavish lifestyle" and therefore you never have to include them in yours, assuming you have one

Even though this wasn't addressed to me and I don't have a lavish lifestyle, I found that comment offensive on so many levels that I need to put in my two cents.

It is rather astonishing that some took offense and immediately began the bashing for an example of another’s largess. I am certain the man who made the many vile assumptions is also the type that must have, “tic for tac”.


And so the men that women are with that earn less than the women are ???? Ohhhh its only women who date men with a higher income that are considered to be living their trashy Harlequin lives.

Yep .... we are the gold diggers. The women who have and do make more than their SO's are better women. I agree.

Naturally, given that this is where granny has squirreled her entire life.
I’ve never read a Harlequin; have you? Bet granny thrives on, and lives vicariously via trashy Harlequinns.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 323 (view)
 
Why some men never want marry?
Posted: 11/16/2009 4:38:45 PM
Verity, why you attempt to bolster monkey, whose posts on here have all been vile, is bizarre. I have always respected you and your opinions. Loyalty and discretion are qualities I admire and also possess. Therefore I am going to refrain from answering your hostile posts directed at me.

Suffice to say my original statement was and still is that most men at the top marry.
You and monkey can rage all you want against marriage but it does not change the facts. As for the children and those of intellect mainly reproducing comment; I never alleged that. Unfortunately just the opposite is true. What I did say is that men at the top do not usually have children out of wedlock.

My position, the one you have taken offense at, is that no matter how much you want to discredit marriage those men, at the very top, still do it. More often than not, the very desirable men, those with a great deal to offer still marry.

If you really want to counter my argument come up with a number of bachelors that are on equal footing with the ones I have mentioned. There may be one or two, but the vast majority of very successful men are wed.


On a side note as a person that was a medical professional, I got somewhat close to my patients, depending on how much time I spent with them, and how often I had to X ray them... I met a life time bachelors that had regrets about not having a person to grow old with.

They wondered what it would have been to have had children, and if perhaps their life would feel so empty…

Nextthyme, I too see it, more often than I could have imagined.

Monkey, those that personally have the most to lose are more likely to disparage another in that manner. I cannot help my age any more than you can help being unattractive and not very bright. Your youth is not that much help; many men older than you are much more desirable even to women of your same age. Enjoy yourself because at 50 you are going to be even more laughable than you are now.

Your posts reveal an angry little man, one who is not too happy with himself or others; why your need to lash out.


Doctors and surgeons work extreme hours, it's very hard for them to go out and find multiple women UNLESS they're very popular and or handsome. Of course most of them choose the "marriage" route, as in "in-house puvvy" They have to buy the COW, other wise they're not getting any.…

Yeah, you are right; you are more desirable than a surgeon. Every woman aspires to one like you.
You would not know anything about their lives. Try transferring your janitorial duties to a hospital, you might learn something.
Your vulgar comments are your life; your projection.


Indiscriminate? That's a big word

Sorry you have difficulty keeping up; that’s your life though. You should be use to it by now.


Believe it or not, we're heck a lot more careful and selective than you'll ever going to be. I am 30 yrs old,


You are a hoot; ROFL.
I doubt you can be very selective as you’ve not much to offer…other than a foul mouth. Usually this is not an attractive trait, not to most.


That car oh so you're proud of... that's a old folk's jag... hope you know it.

It is still something you will never have.
According to the manual that came with the jag most owners of higher end vehicles are over 50. I’ve had jags for most of my life in addition to other vehicles.
Enjoy your bus rides.


Things are changing old lady. Move aside. Nobody is buying your marriage BS anymore.... nobody but idiots and losers. People with options don't need to settle. It's losers like you or your surgeon needs to close the deal otherwise you're not getting any…

Unlike you, of course; you are such a catch. ROFL
No one is trying to sell you on marriage. Who would want you; a guy with nothing to contribute to society or another person.
As I said before make sure you get snipped.



I've never read so much verbal diarrhea in one sitting.

OMFG!!!!!!! *my sides are gonna split* in your dreams sweetheart I just like calling you on your bullchit because you make it all so easy. oh my god please make it stop.

successful men in their 50's going with 20 year olds.......you better start taking some tips loverboy...…


Talk about delusion, you are correct, he lives in lala land.
Glad I’m not the only one who finds him laughable and vile.
Newsflash, the only 50 year olds getting those younger women are successful guys; like surgeons…….
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 448 (view)
 
Love,Quality of life and who pays
Posted: 11/16/2009 3:47:24 AM

Men who get hung up on money, on who pays for what, are angry and resentful. It comes out in all areas of their lives.

I think so too; especially since men value themselves by what they accomplish, often even more than women do. They tend to feel inferior and take it out in anger against anyone who aspires to more than they have to offer. Never have I seen more men with so little to offer refer to women as “gold diggers” as I have in these forums.



Most of my relationships have been with men that have more than I materially. Never have I been made to feel that they must lower their lifestyles to match mine. Rather they elevate me to theirs. My former relationship was with someone I met for business and pleasure. After getting to know him, visiting his home, etc. it was obvious that he was a man of great means. He did the things he regularly enjoyed with me which included a lavish lifestyle. Never have I met a man who worried about how much I will bring to the table. And like you, I want nothing to do with that type of person.~splendere~

I understand. You want a rich guy who gladly spends money on you,~x file~


Sure. Butt……..
Your statement is a hypothesis; given by a young man without prospect of wealth and already resentful of those who do lead prosperous lives.
My statement does not say as you attempted to interpret.


though not directly~x~,

Of course it is direct; I have nothing to “cover up”. You do.
Everyone prefers more rather than less; mostly it is those that are insincere or know they can never aspire to “more” that discredit those with more than they have.


for then it will be obvious of what the transaction is, but indirectly via a "lavish lifestyle".~x~

I thought I was quite obvious; you attempt to turn it into something sinister probably because you cannot afford a life. No doubt you are one of those who never would spring for another but rather requires every cent be equally matched.
Generosity is a great quality, ....you would not know.


My apology in advance if I'm wrong, but a you sound like a special type of a well disguised gold-digger. In one sense, kudos to you!~x~

Your opinion means absolutely nothing to me. I consider the source, and it is not much.
I do not don disguises; I don’t have to.
I doubt that you know anything about humanity in general and specifically about women seeking men of means. You’ve no “gold to dig” therefore your comments are merely resentful and unfounded. Just rhetoric that no one gives credence to. You cannot speak for those that have more than you. I’m not surprised by your comments; they are food for fodder for those like you in these forums.


doubt you would do what your friend is doing. I doubt you will include a man in your "lavish lifestyle". ~x~

You are soo presumptuous.


You want nothing to do with a man who worries about money, which pretty much leaves only "rich guys" or I should say, "wealthy guys",~x~

You cannot speak of that which you do not know. The more wealth a person has the more he worries and the harder he works. You would not know about that but of course you would assume ……..it is what asses do. As I am sure you already know most do not give a big rat’s azz what you assume.


who almost always have their own 'lavish lifestyle" and therefore you never have to include them in yours, assuming you have one.~x~

You become more obviously ignorant by the sentence.
Given your statements I, on the other hand, do not have to assume anything as these presumptuous, unintelligent comments made by someone who does not know of what he speaks says it all.





That still leaves him some 175k a month for his other expenses. Usually when a man makes a great deal of money he does not care what a woman earns. Nor does he mind sharing his lavish lifestyle with her.~splendere~


LOL! I think we can safely write off those stories as fantasies dreamed in an attempt to make the men here with "average" incomes feel insecure. (NOTE: I'm sure they were smart enough to catch onto that without being told it was a set up)~granny boo hoo~

Your claws are showing. Another presumptuous one. Jealous?
You’ve never been in a relationship with a man of great wealth?
Don’t know what it is like to dine on a yacht with more crew than guests?
Too bad; don’t take it out on me.

ROFL, of course it is a fantasy ……..to you…. I agree, not in your world.
It is not even within the realm of your imagination.

However, you can believe whatever turns you on, no skin off my back.

As for making men feel insecure; isn’t that what you do?

You have bragged of your superiority, believe 50k, earned mostly by you, puts you above the “national average”.
Are you so obtuse as to think persons of wealth do not exist and that every person on PoFdom is below your imagined superior income status?
One thing is certain and not anomalous is that successful men, from skilled laborers to CEOs, is that they are not with emasculating women.
Earning $50,000, or more money than her spouse, does not give a woman the right to humiliate her mate.

Anyone with even a modicum of intellect would realize that my example was an extreme one in order to emphasize that most men do not lower their lifestyles when dating a women with a lesser income. Simply a fact. In my world these men exist; although I do not doubt they are not in your world except as a “fantasy, a dream”. Pfffftttttt



There are chicks like me out here that get PISSED about it too cause I've never had a man give me SQUAT but love.

Maybe the men you chose could not afford to give? Or they are stingy?
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 306 (view)
 
Why some men never want marry?
Posted: 11/16/2009 12:58:29 AM

Splender these men are the men that get it, that they are willing to give as much as they want to take... These professionals have realize which I posted before on this thread, get jobs, and move ahead because they are married, which gives them the appearance at least that they stable...

They also enjoy the other perks that these embittered men haven't found, because they went chasing looks and bodies verses full compatibility, as well as being in a give and take relationship.


Nextthyme, it is difficult to explain to those whom have not experienced it the joy that providing for a family or raising a child can bring. Additionally, these are rights of passage; why as you say not many single men will be considered for positions where they are charged with the responsibility to speak for or be responsible for a majority of persons.



Are you implying the more money a guy makes the more likely he is to be married?...…

Yes.



Interesting.
I guess that's good news for all the princesses waiting for their rich prince.…


That’s an unfair analogy or as you are so fond of stating, “That’s a straw man”.




Through their early 30s, economically disadvantaged adults actually are more likely to marry than advantaged adults.

By age 35, other statistics show that the fractions ever married are virtually the same across education groups.

Colonel, thank you for the statistics; we are more in agreement than in disagreement. The older age for the advantaged group may be do to the fact that a lot of professional men want to be established in their careers prior to marrying.
I consider viable any man who earns a decent living and provides for his family; from blue collar, cops, professionals to CEOs. There are a lot more persons at the bottom, in my first example, than at the top. The men in the ghettos, the most burgeoning group in our society, are the least likely to marry or even acknowledge paternity. The only time they do that is to get on some TV show with 3 or 4 other morons to play, “Who’s my baby’s daddy?” with a crack whore.

Bill Gates, Buffett and Paul McCartney - all married and Paul without benefit of a pre-nup. There are less of these guys than the rest of us but my point is that these very desirable men do marry. They, even more than you, can get any, and as many, women as they want. Yet, they marry……….

It is your prerogative not to marry. As long as you are honest from the get-go to the women you engage with I see no harm. Though as I said previously some of you men here have a great deal to offer; it’s too bad you are not passing on your DNA.



A professional man wants a life which includes wife and children; the majority of very accomplished men feel like this. Start attending charity events or galas for differing professions. Almost all are married.~splendere~


That maybe the case among old folks. Certainly not young professionals.~BadMonkey~

ROFL, actually I laughed so hard it bought tears to my eyes.
Yes, it is the old folks having children.
A young eminent surgeon and his wife recently had their first child; he was thrilled. As he said, “he is a version of me“. Some men take great pride in helping to create a family.
Just what profession are you in? Not one that requires a great deal of intellect or education obviously.


In my circle, only losers with nothing to lose marry. Or the losers who can't get a woman whenever they want.~B Monkey~


In your circle, by your statement, you are all losers. Do you really believe that engaging in indiscriminate sex is for winners. That is what losers settle for.


Last thing I want is to ruin my life with a kid. There is no room for a kid in my life.~ B Monkey~


I knew a woman who felt like this; she got her tubes tied. Hope you have been snipped. In fact it is your duty to do so in order to assure that no child is ever born to you.
I think it is grand that you are not reproducing yourself.


Women are dime a dozen, ~Monkey~

Men like you are even cheaper.



Of the 5,400 or so mammal species, only 3% of them mate for life - humans aren't one of them. Needless to say, with several hundred thousand years of biology working against the premise of marriage, its a small wonder that someone ever gets married let alone stays married.


I’ m sorry you’ve not realized, given your age, that most of these other mammals are not thinkers nor do they have a conscience. We humans are rather unique in that way. Though I can see your argument when excusing infidelity, “But honey, our kitty, our doggy is not faithful, how can you expect me to be? And while we’re at it, why should I provide for my children…..They take too damn long to raise.”

Pffffttt. Grow up.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 419 (view)
 
Love,Quality of life and who pays
Posted: 11/13/2009 4:20:05 PM

Of course not....
It's less than 3% of his monthly income.

AND, he's more than likely got himself set up as a corporation where he can set up entertaining as a business expense and offset that against what he pays in income tax.


Actually, it is 10%.


But that is not the point; the point is that he is not lowering his lifestyle to a lesser one in order to date those that are not in his monetary league as was implied in this thread that some think is the proper way to go.

They do not stop going to the theatre or the opera or major sporting events because the tickets are out of reach, on a regular basis, for most.

In other words they WANT to share their lifestyle, not deprive another merely because the other cannot afford that which he regularly enjoys.

It is the same premise basically as when a prosperous man marries and the wife stays home and does not contribute monetarily. They will still live according to his means, the children will benefit from his largess. It is not a difficult concept; whomever has the most money contributes the most. I’ve never seen it done otherwise where dates, marriage has to be downscaled to where the one earning the least sets the standard. Realistically, that just does not make sense.

Even misers, like one of my uncles, although with tight purse strings when it came to her [wife] personal spending, did not deprive themselves of luxury vacations, second homes, nice vehicles and household help.




I would still never want to place myself in a position to become financially dependent on anyone but myself....
especially if a split ever occurred.


I advised my daughter, very early on, to make certain she always had a viable profession. Just in case; like the Jesuit priests who must have a profession before they can be ordained.

It is easy to make your statement; but realistically, would you turn down an offer of marriage, from a man you are in love with, because he was wealthy? If you say yes, then it may mean you may not be able to completely trust or be vulnerable to another. Should you be with child or wish to nurse your baby you will, more than likely, want to be provided for.

I have always been open and comfortable with persons of differing backgrounds. If I were to fall in love, marry again and he had a great deal more than I do; I would count my blessings.


why would it be wrong, (not talking 6 figure salaries or Wall Street here, just normal folks, lol) for the higher earner in a couple to say "Let's just stay in tonight" because they know their partner either can't afford, or would feel uncomfortable, with going out?


I cannot answer that because, as I pointed out previously, I would never feel uncomfortable merely because he is “the higher earner”.

All I can say is I do not know many persons that are uncomfortable because the SO earns less or more. Male or female. That’s what I mean by “Tit for tat”; why should either party feel badly? There may be issues underlying that surface via this channel; like control issues. Being afraid that because another has considerably more one may not be respected or that one will be controlled.

Poverty stricken men with almost nothing have been known to be very controlling; it has little to do with money. Rather it is the person, not the money, that makes one controlling.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 286 (view)
 
Why some men never want marry?
Posted: 11/13/2009 4:09:51 PM

What correlation is there between being desirable and eligible, to wanting to be married?


A strong one obviously since I pointed out that most professionals, for example, marry.
A professional man wants a life which includes wife and children; the majority of very accomplished men feel like this. Start attending charity events or galas for differing professions. Almost all are married.


Is that to imply men who don't want marriage are NOT desirable or eligible?

LOL, you know I would not insult you like this. You know I said MOST, not all. However, depending on one’s goal, like the woman who started this thread, men that do not want marriage are by that definition not eligible.



Are you implying the more money a guy makes the more likely he is to be married?...…
.
Yes.


if so, that stance seems to undermine what many women claim marriage is about.

Not at all. It is not a stance; how can you say that marrying, no matter who is doing it, undermines marriage? That is nonsense.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 282 (view)
 
Why some men never want marry?
Posted: 11/13/2009 1:39:37 PM

You can debate it all you want, but the bottom line is that if marriage and the 'woman' in question, were all that, that they are cracked up to be, men would be tripping over themselves instead of being reluctant, to marry women.


But that’s just it, Verity; men do marry. And the ones most likely to wed are the ones that theoretically have the most to lose. I’ve demonstrated that in my previous posts. Take professionals, physicians, attorneys, etc. beyond a certain age you’d be hard pressed to find many single ones. The fact is that it is the men, with very little to offer, that do not marry; probably because most women do not want them. I travel in these circles of professionals and most of the men are married; a great number of them to stay at home wives, not necessarily with young children at home.


Sorry I had to throw in the insurmountable obstacle of "honest evaluation" for a number of the women.…


You know that is not an evaluation of merit. The fact is that men do get sex while single so the other side of the coin is actually more accurate. Those men that are the most desirable, eligible do marry; despite the fact that they, more than most other men, can get all the sex they want without having to marry. Yet, they choose marriage.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 413 (view)
 
Love,Quality of life and who pays
Posted: 11/13/2009 12:58:36 PM

I've always found one-sided relationships where I was the only (or main) one footing the bill and pulling my weight to be exhausting, and when it was expected of me, I grew resentful and felt I was being taken for granted.


Sweetness, of course you would. But I believe it is all relative. In your case, and I mean no condescension, you probably are not in a 100k’s category. Therefore it would be an imposition to you to always foot the bill.

Let’s say an investment banker is making about 1k an hour. He may spend 4 or 5k a week on fine dining. That still leaves him some 175k a month for his other expenses. Usually when a man makes a great deal of money he does not care what a woman earns. Nor does he mind sharing his lavish lifestyle with her.

They only thing he is taking for granted is that I am enjoying myself as much as he is.

Sometimes a bachelor may rent an expensive summer home as many do when they reside in NYC. He’s not waiting for a woman to help him with the rent for the summer home, he does it because he enjoys it. If he invites me to spend time in his rental home, rest assured, he’s not looking for someone to help him with the rent.

The less money persons have the more important it becomes. Most men that earn a great deal enjoy their money and they are not worried about paying for dinner and other things they usually do. For instance, in NYC where most successful investment bankers, lawyers, etc. are men, they will, of necessity, date from a pool of women that make considerably less than they do. I have never met even one who lowers what he is accustomed to in order to accommodate a woman that makes less. Half the restaurants in NYC would have to close if this was the case.

It is definitely “tit for tat” for anyone who thinks they have to lower the standard of things they usually enjoy in order to date someone of lesser means. I believe that is selfish as well. Most persons that keep such tallies are picayune and not my cup of tea.



Persons looking for “tit for tat” monetarily will be just as picayune in other aspects of life. They will not be very giving, emotionally or physically. It has been my experience that very generous men are also the most accomplished, generous lovers.


What do you base this on ?


I thought I made that clear when I said, “It has been my experience”. I speak for myself. As to selfish persons or that “quid pro quo” mentality; I’ve had close friends and even family members married to men like this. It is not a pretty picture as these persons are usually petty in all aspects of their lives. Everything has to be accounted for.
 splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 406 (view)
 
Love,Quality of life and who pays
Posted: 11/13/2009 10:31:20 AM
OnMyOwn said:


Men who know they want a woman in their life and are prepared to be open, loving, generous, sexual, caring and giving of themselves. THAT my friends is what a REAL man is to me.

If a man or woman really want a relationship and want it to grow TOGETHER they will find a way to make the OTHER partner feel that they are as valuable as themselves. The fact that there are those who would date a man or woman and be in a different financial position would rather SHOW the under earner that because of them, and their inability to earn more money that going out to a gala would be passed by and more fun to watch paint dry.

If a man did that to me ... I would be flashing by him so fast that he won't know where I grew those roadrunner legs ...


I do not know when I have read a post I could agree with more. OnMyOwn, please see my previous post describing my marriage.

Most of my relationships have been with men that have more than I materially. Never have I been made to feel that they must lower their lifestyles to match mine. Rather they elevate me to theirs. My former relationship was with someone I met for business and pleasure. After getting to know him, visiting his home, etc. it was obvious that he was a man of great means. He did the things he regularly enjoyed with me which included a lavish lifestyle. Never have I met a man who worried about how much I will bring to the table. And like you, I want nothing to do with that type of person.

On the other hand I have a dear friend who is the main bread winner in her family; she is also the better educated one. It does not matter to her in the least; they live as well as she can afford. The idea that one would encourage a spouse to move far away and thereby lead separate lives because one or the other needs to cling to their livelihood is bizarre.

There is another thread on the forum regarding marriage. The fact is that men that have a great deal to offer do marry; and most of them are not looking for matching incomes. Physicians often marry nurses; professionals secretaries and so on. What you see in this forum is not the norm, not in real life.

Persons need to realize that affluent men usually live affluently. They enjoy what they earn; in fact enjoying the finer things in life is one motivation for those who aspire to financial success. For example fine dining. Having lived in NYC where I dated an investment banker who regularly took me to upscale restaurants I suggested a home cooked meal. His response was that dining out was a form of relaxation that he liked to enjoy as much as possible. “I live in a city with some of the finest chefs and restaurants in the world; I enjoy the ambiance, choosing from a menu, being waited on and it is no fun alone”. He did not want to be cooked for nor did he expect reciprocation.

Persons looking for “tit for tat” monetarily will be just as picayune in other aspects of life. They will not be very giving, emotionally or physically. It has been my experience that very generous men are also the most accomplished, generous lovers.




I'm sure no one who was married or gave an SO access to an account and lost money because of it thought going in it would be a rotten idea.

That is merely your assumption. The first year I was married I saved tens of thousands of dollars from my household account; which we invested together.
 splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 265 (view)
 
Why some men never want marry?
Posted: 11/10/2009 8:07:06 PM

I was merely trying to make you realize how idiotic it is to imply that anyone should do anything because everyone else does it.

Ron, I believe you may be the idiot. How you concluded that I am implying that anyone should do anything makes me think you lack the ability to actually comprehend what you read.

I�ll say it again; I am pointing out to the OP that many men do marry. Period. Stop. I did not say that they should but that they do. Read it again. Not that they should but that they do.


In any case, you have not answered any of the questions posted in my rebuttal either,

I told you I did not read your entire diatribe; however I did read wldmtnflower�s and I believe she responded to your post quite adequately. I�ve read enough now though to realize that for the most part you merely pontificate. Your opinions are not based on experience, empirical evidence or knowledge; merely your feelings.

As I said before no one cares if you choose to stay single. Though for someone without a great deal to offer you certainly are demanding and expecting a lot.

As for your assertion that marriage carries no benefits or more rights than cohabitation, as some have already pointed out to you, of course it does. It is as such within most civilized societies. The institution of marriage is still very much respected by most of society. That you do not want marriage, or believe in it, does not change a thing about that fact. A dear gay friend wants marriage very much for the reasons aforementioned.


I know I need to just let go, bc if I don't do it, it will stay like it is right now for who knows how long. He has too many issues to work through and not only doesn't have a great opinion of women (we're all apparently psychos) but never ever wants children.

Britt, if a man tells me how he feels; I believe him. When I wanted to marry and have children I would not have been with a man that says as yours does.
He does not have a good opinion of you; and you stay with him; does not seem logical. You do not have the same goals so why not find someone who does?

That was a poignant post wldmtnflower; my sincere condolences as well.
 splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 11 (view)
 
what's REALLY his deal? he won't have sex with me after 2 yrs
Posted: 11/10/2009 6:50:53 PM
He is more than likely asexual. They are rare but it happens. Right in these forums there’s another 40 year old guy who brags about never having even kissed another.

Gay men love sex, lots of sex. The fact that he takes you away for many days at a time makes me doubt that he is a closet homosexual.

You’re getting duped. Probably why he chose someone half his age; knew he would not get away with this with most older women.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 47 (view)
 
Past financial debt torn us apart
Posted: 11/9/2009 9:38:25 PM

In my country, you choose a mate, you struggle together~blackrabb~

Nonsense; if you really believed that you would not be divorced especially since young children are involved. Or are only Americans supposed to struggle?
Your statement indicates you are either a hypocrite or, even worse, you do not know yourself. You’ve got a great deal of growing up to do.

Gee, get yourself a ticket back to Europe already; we won’t miss you.



Now, apparently you didn't get the memo that you need to choose a man by what he has, and for what he can provide for you. You don't have to be with any man who has any warts at all.



Why does OP have to struggle for his serious debts?

She got the memo!

OP, I’d given you my opinion which you chose to ignore because you’d made up your mind prior to posting here. You knew you be hitting the road; you were merely seeking confirmation.

No where have you mentioned love for this man - so, I agree you should leave; ASAP. This guy deserves better than you though he needs to man up or he’ll end up with another just like you.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 227 (view)
 
Why some men never want marry?
Posted: 11/9/2009 9:26:12 PM


Look at movie stars, famous athletes and almost all professionals, heads of state - kings, presidents, prime ministers;~splendere~

Right and just look at how well all of those turn out right? maybe not the best example... plus, I don't think it's ever wise to say "do something because all the celebrities are doing it!", we would all be doing coke, steroids and making false promises if that was the case.~ron~


Ron, you seem to have taken offense at my post. Too bad.

Your rebuttal is rather naïve; news flash - drugs are everywhere but most prevalent in the ghettos; where, incidentally, most do not marry.
Additionally you need to have wisdom is order to know what is wise.

My message was intended to give inspiration to the OP in that most men that have a great deal to offer and thereby also to lose do marry.

I did not read your entire diatribe but read enough to glean you do not want to marry. Good for you; who cares. I am certain the OP and other women wishing to marry are not lamenting the fact that you are not available in the matrimonial pool.

Just to be very clear when I said, “some men that have so much to offer (right in this thread) do not want marriage or children” I was, obviously, not referring to you.

Yet, you would probably benefit from a partnership. As long as she brought something, no matter how meager, to the table.

Britt, there are great numbers of men that take pride in family life and they are everywhere. From blue collar to CEOs. And although as someone pointed out there is not a stigma against having children out of wedlock most accomplished successful men still do so the old fashioned way; they have children within a marriage.

Ron, after reading mtnwldflower’s post I realize just how misinformed and angry you actually are. As she also pointed out not much credence to your naïve, unfounded rebuttal.

Pontificate much?
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 207 (view)
 
IS IT TRUE THAT A WOMAN SHOULDN’T PURSUE A MAN?
Posted: 11/9/2009 9:19:12 PM

I am a food snob (sorry, it is just true).

No need to apologize; I am too.


I have never dated a lady who had the food interest that I do. I can cook.... I mean... I really can cook.

I have dated a man who also thinks like this…..but, I have dined at some of the finest restaurants in NYC, L.A., Miami, etc………..and never has a home cooked meal compared to extraordinary, stellar gourmet chefs. They also have access to superior meats, fish and produce that are not available to us. Don’t get me wrong, I love home cooking and I am an accomplished cook; anyone can be if they can read and have a great sense of smell and taste.


I don't mind being the cook of the house, but the notion of a lady cooking with me is kind of sexy, sensual... erm... kind of a dream.

Quite frankly, and I do not know why, that statement from you makes me want to invite you to stir my pots.

Vannilli, I did not think you were thinking of me individually. When you say, “we”, it implies all women. Believe me, I do not think like you. As for the rest of your post it was not intelligible.


I would rather lift up my skirt to show him my pair of legs and if he is not leg man, then I'll bent a little to show him my pair of tits ,then I will catch him with my big net catcher... but if he is not a leg man ,I'll show him my azz ,and I'll smack his head to be enterested in Tits& Azz..~vannill~

Uck, the visuals are repugnant.
With your mentality you’d be thrilled to have him wave his manhood in your direction in order for him to display his mutual interest. There are sites for your sort of behavior and this is not one of them.



so in my determination of their reality they want to be d*ckless men.~mentor~

You mean like you?
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 193 (view)
 
Why some men never want marry?
Posted: 11/8/2009 5:34:34 PM
Britt, do not give up hope. There will always be men who wish to remain bachelors. You do not want to attempt to change their mindset. But, look at the entire spectrum of life. Almost all successful, desirable men marry. Look at movie stars, famous athletes and almost all professionals, heads of state - kings, presidents, prime ministers; they marry. As do most ordinary persons.


I guess I was just curious about this topic because I've always been told that if a man truly, totally LOVES you, that he will marry you, no questions out. And if he avoids it, he might be happy, but in love.


I think you meant to say, “but not in love”. I agree. The men that say it is just a piece of meaningless paper do not really believe that or they would just do it to keep you happy. Some men look forward to marriage and parenthood; if this is what you sincerely want you will attract this.

Is it not funny that some men that have so much to offer (right in this thread) do not want marriage or children. Yet, the loser guys, some whom cannot even support their offspring, are marrying and reproducing.


I wonder if any of you met your "dream girl", the anxieties would go out the window and you would get married anyway.

Usually a man marries because he feels it is the right time to do so then he sets out to meet the desirable mate. When he is not in a marrying mood dream girls can come and go.

Men that have never married when they reach mid fifties and beyond do start to change their ways. From being on here I’ve learned the aging bachelor gets a bit more needy than when he was younger. These guys in their late 30s and 40s if they only knew how little time they really have. In 15 or more years the dream women they are letting slip through their fingers now will no longer be available to them. They then may have to settle for women they would not even throw rocks at now.

Happy fishing;
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 244 (view)
 
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/8/2009 4:25:00 PM

Awww....Splendere...


I think Verity and Dee covered the salient points in the post you directed to me. No need for me to rehash, just ditto their thoughts on my behalf. Still;

Just so you can be very, very sure….Your sermon is wasted on me.

Firstly, you are not believable. Secondly, your imagination is skewed.
Thirdly,……..Why bother; your thoughts are not impressive; not to me.

On second thought, why not play along with you a bit.

Why do you think I don't indulge in sex right away?

I don’t. I never think about what you say you do or don’t do.


What are women doing that made him feel he could say something like that to me initially?

Just because the guy is vulgar and lacking finesse you want to excuse his boorishness and blame US women? He is lucky to have found you; a perfect twosome IMNTBHO.


ladies, do you bring out the good men

Oh, yeah! And better still they bring out the good in me.


Verity does not tell it like it really is. He tells it like the way he sees it...like most people on here....including you.

LOL, thank God, we see it differently than you. I sooooooo agree.


Like I always say...is it working for you...or him?

LOL, is what working for me? Do you mean do I attract guys like the loser you’re with? Sure, those guys hit on me…..I tell them to get lost. Perhaps that’s why you end up with so many of them.


I do try to give a taste of real life in these forums.

ROFL, I have to stop, you are too much. You are detached from reality; and really I am sorry to say this.


As for you attempt to demean Verityone, face it; He is beyond brilliant and he gets you.

I can spot a clown a thousand miles away, no matter what make up/disguise they're hiding behind...

Even over an internet connection.

Now that’s funeee.


What I will say is that brilliant, confident men are the best lovers. I know; I’ve had more than one. I was married to one…..and we had sex very early on. You see confident, intelligent men know that when we engage in sex is not important. They do not see women they want to be with as easy but rather as “desirable”.

If you were to write or say the stuff you spiel anywhere but here you would be laughed at. Your new bf for instance, (sounds exactly like the old one btw); a middle-aged guy use to getting it on right away but secretly hates it. You come along and save him from all that disgusting sex he is partaking in…..what a crock of shyt.

But really, thanks for the amusement.




you're basically calling me a liar

Not at all. I am capable of saying what I mean, which is; I do not believe you. That is my choice. You’ve made statements alluding to your virtuous nature. I do not believe them or you.


whilst not putting my opinions or judgements down peoples throats
.

You need to go back and read your former posts on this thread.
You maligned others whose opinions you did not agree with. Additionally, you endeavored to denigrate others, physically and professionally, for having an opinion different from yours.

You are back-pedaling now. *yawn*


If we look back at the condemnation against women throughout history, we may just come to realize that women and men are evolutionally wired in the exact same way when it comes to sex…the changes started to become apparent when women were made to suppress their sexuality. Decades of suppression caused women to lose touch of their true sexuality, their desires their passion their strength….which created a sense of guilt…this guilt than became the root of requiring the ‘emotional attachment’ before or even after having sex ….”



Complete and utter nonsense. In the beginning, with cave dwellers, women were dependant on men……..because they were stronger [protection] ruthless [kill animals and foes] and because women gave birth and the children attached to them for some five years. Women needed men for their and their offspring’s survival. This is what is deep rooted in femininity.

You speak of “decades” evolutionally? when these intuitions have been present for millenniums.

In middle eastern culture you are right about why it continues today; but this suffocating patriarchal society has nothing to do with the origins of females depending on men; which incidentally, was totally free of guilt. The guilt from enjoying sexuality comes from knowledge and freedom that some of us women delight in and others, by their own will or the will of others, suppress.

As for suppression of sexual desires, you do realize that certain cultures until not too recently advocated sex was for procreation only; not for enjoyment by either party. Holes in sheets so as not to touch one another…….

We are not wired in the same way sexually. Men have a great deal more testosterone than we do. It drives the sexual urges. Why men, much more so than women, can and are more capable of indiscriminate sex. We desire and enjoy sex as much as men but we do not have these constant urges. Look up how many times a day men masturbate and compare that to women masturbating. The equality of sexual desire comes in after the sexual connection for most women. Start yourself on some testosterone then see how you feel compared to how you felt previously.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 174 (view)
 
IS IT TRUE THAT A WOMAN SHOULDN’T PURSUE A MAN?
Posted: 11/8/2009 3:55:46 PM

Women, don't ever try to go against the nature period

In what era was this period because I’ve not heard of it until now?


I know enough about men to realize they enjoy and respond to being approached and I have enough confidence and self-esteem that a "No, thank you" isn't going to crush me or bring me to tears.

Rejection sucks; but the good part is the knowledge another will come along as they’ve not stopped making hot men.


That's just a bunch of 1950's mentality right there. "A good woman does (this)", "A good woman doesn't do (that)".

I never got that memo, BDJ because waaay back when I was merely 19 I approached my first real love, “Can I buy you a beer?” was my opening line.


I am 55 yrs. young. A long time ago women did not pursue men. That's just something we were taught when young.

I learned to discard things that didn’t make sense when I was very, very young. And I do not remember ever being told that.


You also have very many men who feel they have to make the first move when it comes to all the sexual advances, even during a lt, or they'd never get any. Do you think there's any correlation?


As to who makes the first move? I would think not. But I am certain that these men that are initiating allllll the sexual advances are with less than passionate women. At least passionate for them. Many persons settle for relationships without any real carnal desire for the other; just fear of being alone I’d say.


However unfair it might seem, I hold to the belief that SINCE we live in a world in which certain gendered expectations HAVE existed and haven’t just DISAPPEARED (at least among my generation where I live), that a man’s unwillingness to ask someone out for the first time DOES carry with it different meaning than a woman’s unwillingness to do so.


Well, I do not live in the ‘world’; I live in America and here this “ask some out” is no different for man or woman……..then again you are in Arkansas.


There is NO tradition inhibiting men in this way as has been the case of women until VERY recently.

Yes there is. It was not so long ago that it was considered improper for a man to speak to a woman he’d not been properly introduced to.


In my days we entice a man with our smile,food

Would you please refrain from saying “we”. You do not speak for me. Never, in my entire life have I ‘enticed’ a man with food. Most men could care less about food when they are hot for a woman. Guys love to dine, but……..


The trick for a fellow is to know which one you are dealing with. If the female you are interested in is a girl, jump up from the sandbox and instead of running away play tag. If she is a woman then chase her and make her feel special, and eventually make her realize that she got you by simple luck. If she is a lady then you better just be yourself because that is who she picked and you were never really happy playing the game with the girls or women anyway.~cdbergerac~


I love that! Cheers, cd
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 76 (view)
 
A Plugged up Toilet, so she packed up and left?! Should I let it go?
Posted: 11/8/2009 1:26:17 PM
This is a joke, right? You cannot be serious. Weren’t you on here before? And then it was a computer you wanted back.

Buddy, if this is true, please stop dating; you’re not ready. Most 9 year olds have more common sense than you.

I think the kid peed on her toilet seat on purpose; one way to get rid of at least one
nutjob.

You are perfect for each other; can you give the kids to their mom?

P.S. We did not need the graphic toilet explanation.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 27 (view)
 
Past financial debt torn us apart
Posted: 11/8/2009 12:51:27 PM

So he's in debt, you're sneaky, the two of you cannot converse & you are on a dating site bad mouthing your man. Money is not the issue of your problems

And looking for another, debt-free guy.


The fact that the guy makes a great income is of paramount importance. With some proper guidance and lifestyle changes these issues can be dealt with and overcome. It all depends on how much you think of him. Your money could contribute to your mutual living expenses while most, not all, of his would go toward his debts. As to the home, it has to be dealt with in a proper manner. See a financial consultant.



Sweetheart, you're supposed to be looking out for yourself, and to find love and happiness.

Now, apparently you didn't get the memo that you need to choose a man by what he has, and for what he can provide for you. You don't have to be with any man who has any warts at all.

ROFL Now that's funee!
 splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 303 (view)
 
Love,Quality of life and who pays
Posted: 11/8/2009 11:15:13 AM

I'd be interested to hear the comments and criticisms from the women, on a post made by a woman, who feels the same about her "money" as many men do, which is, "what's mine is mine, what's yours is yours", and not wanting someone who is going to freeload and benefit from the other's spoils.~Verity~


Funny; I’d written my reply before reading your statement. I’m a bit late but here goes.


It matters to me what a man does for a living and how much he makes.

I have dated men who are blue collar or not at my financial level. Never works. The friends are different, the circles are different.


Since starting to date again, after a very long hiatus from it, I date the entire spectrum; from cops, skilled laborers, professionals and CEOs. They all had commonalities, traits that I consider important; all were intelligent, successful and well-mannered. No problem with their friends.


So tired of men and the goldiggers comments. That is so 1950.

I think it is more prevalent now, at least in these forums. I’ve dated men where any thought of my chipping in for dates would be beyond ludicrous; if someone thinks that is a gold digger not a problem as I am not on here to win accolades. I think I know who I am and that I can never be bought.


I have my own business, own my home, make good money and have a good lifestyle. I am not interested in a man who does not share that lifestyle.

That, of course, is a prejudice. Most of the men, and women, I know do not feel like this.


I don't want to have to worry about money, constantly negotiate who pays what because the incomes are so unequal.

Then a man, with your same mindset, that has a great deal more than you should not date you either. How would you feel knowing you are not good enough for someone?


A successful man is always more attractive than one who isn't.

Agree, but see above; success has nothing to do with his livelihood.




I felt it was an important and vital responsibility to be in the position of a stay-at-home wife and mother.

My husband and I wanted this; additionally I had a housekeeper, gardener and chauffeur if I wanted to use him. I rarely cooked as we ate dinner out 3 to 4 times a week.
Raising children is a full time job if done right. Creating a home that is a sanctuary to a man can be very rewarding for us both. Also, I devoted some time to culture and charity.
There are men that do not want women working outside the home and yes, it does give him a great deal of control. That is not always a bad thing as I did as I pleased.


Now, there are many moms who'd give their left arm to be able to raise their own children but can't because of economic reasons.


Absolutely. Day care centers, cheapest form of child care, are for the most part a horror. A woman would need a lucrative position, or her husband would, in order to provide proper child care. Then if she wants to work go for it. But, there are those that of necessity must work and avail themselves of some form of inexpensive day care. Since that is more the norm than not some of the more lucrative corporations, like the Federal government now provide on site daycare. Good for
them.

My thoughts on this are, OP that different lifestyles exist. Some persons can afford to live lavishly on one income and may not wish to work outside the home. Others, though not needing two incomes, may both desire to work. Still others, and I believe the majority of persons in this thread are in this category, need to have both parties employed.

I would not have any qualms about hooking up with either one who has more or less than me. Though candidly more is much better as money allows you freedom to do what you want, when you want to.



most men in real life are laughing their asses off at the effeminate men who can't make a nickel~savanno~.

Being effeminate has nothing to do with his ability to earn a living. I’ve known effeminate men who command big salaries. This is merely a prejudice some have against, usually, metro-sexual men.



Enjoy the dump you live in, enjoy bragging about how money is not important to you, enjoy posting all day ... and enjoy the first of the month when you get your welfare cheque.
Most men on here aren't puzzie whipped, they are puzzie wishing ... wishing someone, anyone would date them and get them up to the next stage in life. Out of the basement appt~savonna~.


Just because these are the type of men you are meeting here does not indicate that all men on here are as you say. They are the ones you have chosen. I’ve not conversed with or dated anyone from this site that is as you say. The common denominator of these men you speak of is you.


The men on here only complain because most of the women aren't interested in MOST not all but lets just say the vast majority of you men~savanno~.


Is that not also the reason you complain so very, very much? I believe your statement is also applicable to you.



But this is derailing from the topic of the OP about the sense of entitlement, the double standards, and increased focus on "materialism" vs character and personality, observed in female mate selection, in contrast to the males.~verityone~


There are many women on here that espouse this view, “He must have at least as much as I…..”. I know women that are the main breadwinners and they do not feel like this.



but lowering yourself doesnt make you look very well.


You started the thread and wanted everyone to discuss your question. If you can't suffer what you don't like or can't learn to better one from others, you should keep quiet and don't try to get attention from everyone.~ahappygal~


You should take your own advice. Perhaps you could learn from others as well. You were rude to comment on the OP’s looks. Would you like that done to you? You’re no prize yourself. As for the “idot” comment why don’t you just crack open the English tutorial instead of flinging insults.


but I've yet to see anyone request that "you keep quiet"?


I just did.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 59 (view)
 
Second chances?
Posted: 11/4/2009 3:02:46 PM

OP, I find your smug attitude quite amusing and it really gives your youth and inexperience away!
If you're friends are awed by your self discipline, I suggest they get out more and stop being so easily impressed.


Could not agree more.

It is beyond silly to think of not asking another out again because of a first no depending on the reason for the no.

Anyone who has invested a great deal in a relationship AND still have feelings for one another are only cheating themselves by not giving a second or third or any number of chances. Why would I walk away from a chance of love because at first it did not succeed? If the situation just was not right at the time; it may be different now. A second chance situation may bring the mutual desire for lasting fulfillment that both parties seek. Although some of the issues that drove us apart cannot change they can now be dealt with. Other issues just require more flexibility from both persons.

When core values are more alike than not and the physical is a perfect fit it becomes self-defeating not to give it another go.

OP, your rigidity stems from fear. You are afraid of being let down or getting put down again. It takes courage to try again especially if it was the other person who ended it then wants another chance. As a man perhaps you fear letting another back into your life may be perceived as a sign of weakness. Strong men do not fear being thought of as weak for giving us another go.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 83 (view)
 
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 9:24:02 PM
Belle or Daisy, whomever you are, I’m addressing you with the knowledge that all threads deemed demeaning to you get deleted; but here goes.


Can I say this? The first time my S/O met me he said this (among other things)..."I want to lay you down right now, pull your shorts off and put my mouth between your thighs and lick them all the way to.." You get the idea?


That is beyond a vulgar statement on a first meet.
Your imagination runs away with you……..

You want someone to lick your pvssy and it is obviously not happening. So in the hopes of attracting same you offer, ‘You get the idea’. How’s that working for you? Had many takers?


Since then, it has been everything from ripping each other's clothes off before the door even closes to clothes strewn from room to room. He is a bit more passionate than I am and he is raw sexuality. Anywhere and anytime. I thrive on this and I respond to him like I have never done with anyone else. Orgasms? Plenty.

Too much information.
No one is asking.
No one cares about your personal (imaginary) sexual exploits.


This man now wants to get married. He says he sees growing old with me.


There are plenty of us that hope he will ‘Ride off into the sunset’ with you, never to be heard from again.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 81 (view)
 
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 8:59:14 PM

Not bad going for a woman of 40. 1 true love, and one that got away.


When someone your age claims to haveing known just two men intimately it says less, not more, about you. If you were some quiet nun-like woman you could get away with that. But, you are an outspoken-in your face- opinionated woman willing to degrade another at a moments notice. You are bitter; you cannot get around that.


I shall ignore your attempt at a rally,, my tennis allusion seemed to hit the mark. Job done.

You are correct; you need to ignore my statements because your statement was merely an attempt to degrade another; it was not factual. Mine is based on fact and experience. I did the job. You failed.


You say you dont belieive I never had sex without love?

Absolutely; Noooo doubt about that.
I know it is difficult for women like you to accept that Verityone and OnlyThis have the courage to tell it like it is on these forums. It is beyond laughable to think you and other pretend virgins are going to fool anyone. You do not.
Desirable men do not expect, nor necessarily want, ‘withering on the vines’ women. They actually know that we are going to be sexually active. There is absolutely nothing so earth shattering in your attempt to define your sexual life as merely with two guys as to make you more desirable. You are no more or less than women that have enjoyed intimacy with a greater number of men.


The confusion seems to stem from not realizing that it's not so much the "sex" part that is releasing the "emotions", but the feelings of trust, openness, vulnerability that naturally must be present in order to have "sex".
It's a fallacy to conclude that the only way these can be present, is within the confines of a committed relationship.

Verity, you enlighten those whom dwell in darkness and illusion.

Before I can love another I need to trust him, be vulnerable with him, know that my body is desirable to him. Without sexual intimacy this is not obvious. To have sex with another whether you are woman or man means to trust and be vulnerable to another; it is not one sided.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 20 (view)
 
Join the army at 40
Posted: 11/3/2009 7:56:02 PM

alli oop your comment of >>> I think think the u.s gov. is thankful anytime they can get a new pawn no matter the age. good luck to you.

That kinda tells people specially me a man who served proudly in the military mainly the Army and who has three brothers / sister & Aunt who retired from the Army that you have very little respect for the military.


I agree. Don’t some persons realize that in addition to the gentlemen (OP) there are scores of very well-educated men that have many other choices yet choose the military. They, and the OP, are not merely pawns but men with a great deal to offer any career. Not just anyone gets into West Point or Annapolis. These academies are more difficult to get into than most Ivy League colleges.

I’m always disheartened when encountering those who do not appreciate the military. We have the world’s most elite forces. The fact that these men and women are all volunteers makes then even more admirable.
 splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 72 (view)
 
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 7:16:08 PM

your subsequent speculation, are irrelevant.


You’re funny, really you are. Are you so sure of your opinions as to think they are more relevant than mine or others? I think not; especially since yours are so vitriolic. Rather makes what you say insignificant.

For instance, you say:

slightly effeminate looking tennis coaches, who seem to need to prove their manliness to make up for their rather feminine facial features, and a proffession which screams ' Lothario of a proffessional kind'

I’m not sure who you are referring to but if it is “OnlyThis”, I do not think his facial features effeminate. Anyway who are you to judge his looks? I’m certain you would not want your looks scrutinized as there is nothing that attractive about your facial features either. But, now that you’ve opened up this subject - way dated hair, roots aglow - believe me, you don’t want to go there.

Tennis screams Lothario? Good God, you are full of prejudices and gross misconceptions. I recently attended a charity event for which the draw was tennis matches. We had some tennis players and coaches whom have been on the most prestigious tennis circuits that exist. No Lotharios were present; but a lot of generous men happy to donate their time and money to a worthy charity.

I can not help but wonder how you came to the “Lothario” conclusion? Are you a tennis player groupie? I know they exist, I’ve seen them; but for the most part most of the tennis guys are taken and the single ones aren’t trolling for babes at these events.

And not for one second do I believe that you have only had sex with love; noo way.
You would not be this bitter if that were true.

I'm sure you'll agree, gw
 splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 69 (view)
 
Sex versus love
Posted: 11/3/2009 5:45:14 PM

the day when some guy is banging your daughter for recreational sex.


It may come at the same time she enjoys recreational sex; it happens, not just today, it has always been like this. Not all person’s need to “Be in love” to enjoy sex.

IMO, it is a never married 30s man who presents a dilemma for women as he proclaims love for all who are with him in this manner.

Then again, I too am in love with all whom I make love with……..at that moment. I’ve been known to make such proclamations, “I love…..how you feel------”.

I can do just fine with lust; in fact I fall in lust before I fall in love. So I’m with OnlyThis.

Funny that the most vitriol comes mainly from two whom never felt enough “love” either for or from to form a lasting relationship with a SO yet, have only had sex with love. What is wrong with this picture?


I need a beer.
Have two! Cheers!!
 splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 16 (view)
 
Join the army at 40
Posted: 11/3/2009 2:48:22 PM

Am I crazy?

Not at all. You will be given opportunities to train for a new career if you decide to leave the army. You will also be able to look forward to medical benefits and a pension if you serve long enough.


Getting orders from a younger man isnt a big deal for me, we are all getting older so things like this will happen soon or later, no matter what you do for a living.

You’re so right. Any one re-entering the work arena can expect this as well. As for being around a lot of younger persons that may actually be a positive.
Just recently, on a documentary about longevity, a 94 year old surgeon was asked his secret for a fulfilling long life - his reply, “Don’t hang around old people”. LOL

Good luck to you; I’m certain you will do great in the armed services.
 splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 16 (view)
 
Can someone explain y so many women on dating sites require events/things to be happy?
Posted: 11/1/2009 12:48:05 PM

Doing stuff is exciting. It's memory-building. It's living life! It's a conversation starter. It helps to really get to know how someone interacts with the world as opposed to how they THINK they interact with the world. It helps to reveal their likes, their dislikes, their personality.

I believe this is very accurate.

It is always a pleasure to have someone invite you to do something as they endeavor to get to know you.

It is beyond awkward on the first one or two dates to just vegetate. Usually these guys are just looking for a warm body to possess. It is boring and will not result in provoking my interest.

The OP admits that this is his primary dating motivation:

I'm quick to like someone. I'm happy spending time with her. Why must I give her something so I could just get to know her?


Choosing someone on a dating site and expecting an immediate connection so that just being with you is enough is too much to demand initially. Unless you are a spectacular being merely basking in your glow is usually not enough.


Guys like you want company and affection but want to put no effort into it.

Good relationships do not “Just happen” they take effort.


If you are happy doing nothing...............Do it by YOURSELF!
Or get a golden labrador, oh wait! they also want to go out! Never mind.


Dogs love going out; just pick up their leash and watch them go into utter excitement!
 splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 12 (view)
 
Let's take a walk in the woods
Posted: 10/31/2009 2:09:13 AM

For first meetings, I dont know why guys think it's a good idea to bring a lady to an isolated area like a path in the woods (where no one can hear you scream) or invite them to your place.


You work in security and you ponder these suggestions?




I wish men would *think* and *TRY* to be more considerate of a woman's security!


The men that have asked to meet me are.
I would think someone is out of touch with reality if they suggested what you’ve had posed to you.

You need to think for yourself; really it’s a no-brainer.
 splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 12 (view)
 
Do I have trouble with committing?
Posted: 10/31/2009 1:49:29 AM
#4 out of 9;


Thats the thing I dont have issue's. Its just I thought I was ready for the dating world. But just carrying an conversation with a guy still freaks me out.


See message #5.

It is not fair to inflict yourself on another at this time.
 splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 5 (view)
 
False profiles
Posted: 10/31/2009 1:37:03 AM

but for mail to be unread month after month,


There is no way for you to come to this conclusion as your sent mail disappears after a month at most.

I always look at the profile first and your photo just isn’t attractive IMO.
When someone gets almost no responses its usually because you are writing to those who are not your match. Refine your picker.



I am starting to wonder if there are a lot of false profiles on this site.

Just because you do not get responses?
You do not make sense.
 splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 3 (view)
 
This ones for the ladies!!!!!!!!!!
Posted: 10/31/2009 1:24:55 AM
You are cute enough, but what’s with the Sluggo hat?
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 66 (view)
 
Does exclusivity applies in FWB relationship?
Posted: 10/29/2009 1:22:43 AM

I had 2 ongoing FWB a while back with 2 woman who happened to be acquaintances. Yes they didn't know about the FWB until I mentioned it to one. She was furious that I was "sleeping" with someone else all this time.


You’ve answered your own question. FWB may or may not include exclusivity. In your case it did not.
However, that does not mean that you do not owe these women courtesy and consideration. Of course you should have told them both of the other. I don’t blame her for being upset; it was not over you having another liaison but because it was with someone who she is acquainted with. You should have asked the first woman if she would mind you fooling around with her acquaintance; then if you’d gotten the go ahead informed the other as well.


Not my fault that she got emotionally connected.

Friends are connected emotionally. You do not seem to have a clear grasp on what a relationship entails.


IMO/IME most people that are in FWB aren't really in FWB. They aren't looking for it, they happen to fall into it because they simply want to avoid any responsibility, commitment, risk, or conflict in their life. Like when 8 year old's pretend they are married.
IOW people like to objectify and use other people, and then say "whoa, I am just looking for a FWB." FWB becomes an excuse, a rationalization, a justification, not a proper definition of the relationship.


What he said; wise man.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 162 (view)
 
Robot lovers - yes or no?
Posted: 10/29/2009 12:41:20 AM

Imagine we live in a time where you could design your perfect mate


Since I have never had a “Type” it would be impossible for me to conjure up a mate.


Downside: he/she is a robot - an amazingly lifelike robot, but still at heart - well, she/he has no heart.

That’s what it is all about for me; yes, he needs some basic physical attractiveness but after that it is his finer qualities, his passion, his heart, his mind, his soul that captures my heart.

However, I would definitely take one for massages, cooking………
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 56 (view)
 
more sex
Posted: 10/29/2009 12:25:39 AM

I have always wondered how much of what men put up with is proportional to the amount of sex they get, and I think that more sex means more allowances for women being crazy.


Discounting marriages where he may stay because of children men put up with bad behavior because they cannot easily get another woman. If a man has a lot of choices he is not going to stick around no matter how good [you think] the sex is. He will find another with equally thrilling sex and finer qualities.

Another exception to “Putting up with” is for men that are with exceptionally gorgeous women. These women are sometimes with men for what they can get from them materially not because they’re in love with them and their frustration comes out in crazy antics. Usually these men are a bit masochistic so they are getting what they want.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 82 (view)
 
Does Sex Change How you feel ?
Posted: 10/28/2009 11:54:37 PM

Measuring one's worth by societies standards is no way to live one's life,

It is soo middleclass……


I've never had a long term relationship with a woman who has had sex with me very early on... basic reasons are I don't think she would have changed her dating style for ME

And the converse of this is also true…..
She may have made you wait but done it on the first date with everyone else………
You will never know.


A lot of women view having sex with a man as "giving" him a gift,

With this mind set could it also not be viewed as him giving her a gift?


I GAVE myself to you

I have never given myself to a lover; I have taken him as my lover.


if I get to the point of giving myself to a man - I want a realtionship,

You expect payment before delivery; it does not usually work this way.


But a woman who has the "expectation" that I'll invest "emotionally" and commit to a "sexual relationship" before I know very well and good what I can expect "sexually", has very unrealistic "expectations".
In that context, the woman in question offends me by thinking I'm stupid enough to sign up for that deal.
And she'll get no respect for thinking that I'm stupid.

This is one reason that I believe sex has to happen very early on. I know if we have potential for long term or merely a fling. We are obvious [with our intentions] even if we do not think we are.


I'm short several years from 30, but I got a mind of an 800 years old.

Touche!! Well, maybe 80.


By "not ruled by sex" I mean women who like sex but don't choose their partner ONLY for sex. Real women choose their man based on sex BUT ALSO because of higher vitreous vitreous - like courage, wisdom, kindness, justice,

Absolutely. And these qualities or virtues are apparent very early on.


Does Sex Change How you feel ?

How I feel about him? If there was a desire for a love affair intimacy certainly cements that feeling if the lovemaking was fulfilling; for me it is nirvana.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 9 (view)
 
I need advice please!
Posted: 10/16/2009 3:39:34 AM

I need an insight, I really don't know what to do.


OP, baby; it seems you are in a relationship with your mother and she is a selfish, domineering, controlling mother. You have been emasculated.

Run, do not walk to the military; they will take you [again?].

Do not say goodbye, do not look back; it’s your only hope.


she mentioned how guilty she feels cuz she talked me out of getting that contract
No way does she feel guilty; this is additional manipulation.

Get away! Do not pass go; do not collect $200.…..Run,
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 26 (view)
 
Would this bother you and should I talk to him about it?
Posted: 10/16/2009 3:06:35 AM

one of the first times we hung out, he mentioned one of his best girl friends and said she was so cool that he "wanted to marry her someday."


If at this time you were not a couple, he was speaking to you as a friend. Obviously he now prefers you. How long have you been a couple?

When a guy does not get a woman he wants he moves on. Most persons, and your guy sounds like one of them (your second post) are not going to mope over a woman for the rest of their lives. Of course he had feelings for someone before you, didn’t you?

If he is with you it is because he wants you; end of story. You have to trust that he is being truthful or you will not be able to have a loving relationship. I’ve always felt if he wanted someone else he would not be with me. It’s not like you are his only option I’m sure. Forget what the guy who’s hot for you said; think for yourself.

If I am in love with someone I trust and believe them. To not do so is to be cynical and suspicious; is that what you want to become? Loving relationships involve risk and vulnerability. If you really care for him you need to believe him.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 27 (view)
 
Men and needs
Posted: 10/16/2009 2:42:08 AM
A wise and older girlfriend of mine said to me that, "Men need to feel needed."

Not necessarily a statement born of great wisdom…..

I think it’s true….. Only if they want you


He said it was sad but true

Now this is not even close to wise.

Thought you said it was a girlfriend?
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 11 (view)
 
Ideas? Should I call his home?
Posted: 10/16/2009 2:11:13 AM

I am getting very worried. Should I go by his house to check on him? Call his home?


I’m sure one of Senor’s suggestions should bring you all the comfort you seek.

I, however, think he may have realized excessive use of those blue pills have been known to cause blindness.

Or he has merely tired of your delusions, “66 year old married man, resonably good health, high sex drive” …..“a few extra pounds”.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 49 (view)
 
sexually frustrated
Posted: 10/15/2009 1:12:10 AM
Op, I am not being unkind; just truthful. You said you “Would LOVE to hear any and all advise”, so here goes.

What you have described is sex with men that are not into you. They get off and it’s all over for them. When a man is into you, especially when this young they do last a long time.

You are an attractive and bright girl wait until you get a guy who is crazy about you, you will see the difference.

As far as what you are doing now:


I've tried the blunt aproach

when I ask for a repeat they go "are you serious?"

I'm not doing anything wronge... except maybe being too eager...

Should I be more demanding right from the start?

I like my man to work for it

More so then not I take over... so I dont see why he would be exhausted..


Perhaps you think you are being sexy but if you come across like a drill sergeant some guys will get turned off. Big difference between being adventurous and uninhibited and coming across as expecting a guy to perform for you.


are there actually guys out there that can go 2-3 times in one night??

I have never known one that could not go that many times and even more.

And the rest thing; not always necessary. Some men will climax and do not rest; merely pause for a moment or two.

Perhaps being a bit submissive, rather than demanding, for a change may bring better results for you…….and your partners.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 31 (view)
 
timeline , phone numbers, and safety
Posted: 10/14/2009 11:35:51 PM

I don't see the point of endless messages back and forth within PoF. What is the happy medium?


It is a case by case basis for me. Some men write so beautifully that receiving their letters is thrilling; however, they are rare.


What is the prevailing wisdom about who should be offering their number first; male or female?


Men always offer me their phone numbers first. However, I find it a bit desperate to receive it with an initial message…….and presumptuous.


Is it safer to give your home phone or cell phone?


Supposedly cell numbers are more difficult to trace; but, honestly I do not worry about it. Most of the men I’ve met via cyberspace give me there personal info before meeting but I have met some whom I did not know much about.


what are people's responses to someone's immediate request to use Yahoo or AOL Instant Messaging (don't we have that option within PoF?) and using their personal email?

I do not get the email request at all. I either ignore them or tell them I prefer to use PoF. Eventually I give my email to my friends but not initially. Sometimes instant messaging is good especially with distant acquaintances.


advice from male or female would be much appreciated. I want to meet new people and take basic safety precautions.


I do not believe there is any one magic formula for fun and safety. Trust your instincts. I stay away from demanding guys or any “Home” invitations. His or mine. Also, guys with no photos are almost always married or, they say, separated; so I stay away from them too. Unless I’ve met them through the forums, then pics usually follow. I’ve met persons from other states and even other countries here, so far it’s all been good.

Wish you well………
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 29 (view)
 
Sexual compatability and timing
Posted: 10/14/2009 10:57:14 PM

As shallow and terrible as it sounds, I wish there was a way to just know what a man had going on downstairs without coming across as easy or slutty.


How can you not know? Don’t you make out with these guys prior to the main event? Men get excited then so I do not get how you have a problem with this. I always know; not that it matters.

Also, I’ve not known any guy that thinks a hand on his thigh is not sexy.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 908 (view)
 
guns at home
Posted: 10/13/2009 1:18:31 PM

That is why what your are doing is ad hominen. You cannot argue the topic and my stance on it with and credible empirical evidence or with logic, ~Ismene~


You demand “empirical evidence”? I did not want to be unkind but everything you say is just your opinion and that would be ok if you did not demand from others that which you do not provide.


Statistics. Look at the statistics for where you live.

Why not provide this in order to give credence to your argument……..
Surely you are not so naïve as to believe that I and others who disagree with you are going to do your work for you.


Statistics on violent crime, on gun violence, on other reasons that put people at risk. Figure out how much danger you are actually in. Realize there is more chance you will be killed in your car driving to work than by someone with a gun.

Are you going to give up your car and start taking the bus because it is safer?


Hell no, I am not giving up my car……..or my firearms.
What is your point here?


Realize there is more chance you will be killed in your car driving to work than by someone with a gun.

Then by your logic and irrational fear of firearms you should not be in vehicles either; since they are even more likely to cause you harm.
You do realize you are arguing against yourself.

You do not realize that this is what some firearm devotees have been saying all along, that you are more likely to be killed by a car and a multitude of other things than by a firearm. Glad to see you are now facing and willing to admit truth.


How do you know about the deflect criminal activity? I mean if you live in a neighborhood and your neighbors know you have a gun, this info gets around,some would be burglars hear this info and say well we better not break into the Jones's they have a gun, ...these types of things happen all the time and no Police report is filed so all of your statistics really don't reflect the true effectiveness of Gun ownership…

I inferred as much earlier in the thread. It happened that all around us were getting robbed; the police chief jokingly? said we were immune because the word was out, I was “packing”. I do not understand the stance of most women’s fear of firearms when the real fear should be that they are, for the most part, defenseless.
 Splendere
Joined: 3/19/2007
Msg: 52 (view)
 
Single... does it equal weird?
Posted: 10/9/2009 5:58:17 PM
Interesting question; requires some self-scrutiny.

Basically yes; we cannot help it. We do become accustomed to having stuff our own way.

It helps if at some point we have been married or raised a child. At least we have at some point become accustomed to giving, sharing and seeing things from another point of view.

Given the right person to connect with though I know I could get used to living with another again……..and enjoying the situation.



I passed weird a long ways back and have become so convoluted and strange in my approach to frustration that the shock of intimacy would probably fry all of my circuits and render me daft. The adaptation has thoroughly estranged me from normalcy.


So well said; I did feel like that when I started dating after a rather long hiatus from the mating world.



I disagree...I talk to my dog...all the time. It is when it becomes a dialog...…~revilors~

You mean your doggy did not engage in dalog?…..Mine did....
 
Show ALL Forums