REGISTER
|
MAIL/PROFILE
|
HELP
|
NOW ONLINE
|
SEARCH
|
RATING
| FORUMS |
SUCCESS STORIES
Posted In Forum:
All Forums
Alabama
Alaska
Alberta
Arizona
Arkansas
Art/Music
Ask A Girl
Ask A Guy
Australia
British Columbia
Broken Hearts
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Dating & Love Advice
Dating Experiences
Dating Sites
Delaware
District Of Columbia
Event Hosts forum
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Health & Fitness
Humor
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Introductions
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Manitoba
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Brunswick
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
Newfoundland
News/Current Events
North Carolina
North Dakota
Nova Scotia
Off Topic
Ohio
Oklahoma
Ontario
Oregon
Over 30
Over 45
Pennsylvania
Plentyoffish Get Togethers
Plentyoffish Site/Suggestions/Help
Poems And Quotes
Politics
Prince Edward Island
Profile Reviews
Quebec
Recipes & Cooking
Relationships
Religion/Supernatural
Rhode Island
Saskatchewan
Science/Philosophy
Sex and Dating
Single Parents
South Carolina
South Dakota
Sports
Stories/creative writing
Technology and computers
Tennessee
Testimonials
Texas
Uk Forums
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Volunteer Moderators Only
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Home
login
MyForums
Show ALL Forums
Author
Thread: How can I put my video onto a disc?
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
2 (
view
)
How can I put my video onto a disc?
Posted:
11/11/2009 2:10:00 PM
I know someone with a DVD burner on their computer, if they uploaded my videos could they put them on a DVD for me?
Short answer - yes!
Longer answer - the videos are stored on the memory card like normal files on your PC, burning them direct to the DVD would mean you have open the DVD in the same way you access the hard disk, double click on a video and it would play with one of the many free players available - Windows Media Player, Quicktime Player, RealOne Player and many others.
With the right software you can create a DVD that will play like a normal DVD found in the stores, you can add titles and all sorts of effects. 5, 5 minute videos would take up very little space on a DVD, standard DVD's can hold about 4 hours of video.
Also, how do I tell how much space on my memory card the videos are taking up? The card is 4GB, and the salesperson told me it holds about 1,000 pictures. So far I have a little over 600 pictures. How much space would my videos be taking up?
There are numerous card readers available that plug into the USB port on the computer, once the card is inserted into the reader it can be accessed like a normal disk drive. The size of an individual picture is determined by the camera resolution(expressed as megapixels, mega means a million, a pixel is an individual point in the picture) and by the method the picture is saved. Most cameras allow you to resolution of the saved picture(normally as a JPEG). JPEG format allow control of the amount of compression applied to the saved picture, generally the more compression the smaller the file size and the lower the quality of the image.
hope that helps
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
32 (
view
)
OTEC..... electricity from the ocean blue...........
Posted:
11/11/2009 1:46:46 PM
gadgetdoc
Read my reply to Paul above, it is the U.S. government. If you follow the various links there is more information about the EIS. Do a search for 'wave power' and you will find numerous links, here is one I found -
http://news.cnet.com/Wave-power-to-go-commercial-in-California/2100-13840_3-6223220.html
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
31 (
view
)
OTEC..... electricity from the ocean blue...........
Posted:
11/11/2009 1:41:32 PM
Paul
I checked out the site you recomended, and it is a good reason why so many people in the environmental movement are considered whacky
If you look and see who the EIS is you will find they were created by the U.S. government during George W's presidency and he is certainly not a wacky environmentalist! Check this link -
http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/wave-power-scotland/
The people promoting these devices are engineering firms with the sole aim of making money, as stated in the article it is the result of a successful pilot project in Portugal. They may look "Rube Goldberg" but they are all based on REAL science.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
26 (
view
)
OTEC..... electricity from the ocean blue...........
Posted:
11/10/2009 12:59:19 PM
Paul
check out this link -
http://ocsenergy.anl.gov/guide/wave/index.cfm
it explains some of the different methods that could be used
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
21 (
view
)
Why are there 'no pyramids in Kansas '
Posted:
11/9/2009 2:05:40 PM
The east coast is not that far from Africa, and when you consider the Bering straight is a causeway from Japan to LA—Why is it that, there are no Pyramids in Kansas..
Geography lesson - the Bering Strait is believed to be a causeway that early humanoids used to migrate from Northern Russia to Alaska(west coast!).
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
17 (
view
)
OTEC..... electricity from the ocean blue...........
Posted:
11/9/2009 1:51:06 PM
This seems to be a very viable source of energy. I would ask why it is not in more popular use...........
This seems to be similar to the technology used in domestic heat pumps where the sub-surface temperature differential is used both as a heating(in winter) and cooling(in summer) system. The initial cost of such a system is higher than a furnace/AC unit but the running costs are much less, I believe it is something like a 10 year ROI(Return on Investment).
I would think wave power would be cheaper to implement and easier to manage.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
16 (
view
)
OTEC..... electricity from the ocean blue...........
Posted:
11/9/2009 1:44:27 PM
Atomic plants don't explode they melt down. In other-words they run out of water to cool them, and slow the Fission reaction.
The water does nothing to slow the fission reaction, the reaction is controlled by carbon rods which absorb the radiation depending on there position relative to the reactive mass.
Chynobel anyone? That was the worst atomic accident in history, and it didn't explode.
No it didn't but its radiation cloud was felt as far away as the UK. Radioactive particles were detected in the grazing pastures used by sheep farmers, albeit quite small amounts.
The radiation from the plant has caused major health problems for both the people who lived in the area and the emergency services who responded to the incident.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
7 (
view
)
DVD soundtrack to CD?
Posted:
9/29/2009 5:24:28 PM
You could do that or you could just rip the digital audio stream straight off the disc with a piece of software like ImToo DVD audio ripper.
BladeRunner
The thing I like about Sound Studio is that it allows me to set markers where I can separate the captured file into individual files allowing me to discard dead time on vinyl or chat on a DVD. If the OP is talking about the Band DVD then there is a significant amount of time spent talking between tracks which would exceed the time of a CD. Cutting out the chat would allow the music to be recorded to a CD, it is a while since I watched the DVD so I am unsure if only the music can be recorded to a single CD.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
4 (
view
)
DVD soundtrack to CD?
Posted:
9/29/2009 1:41:25 PM
Is it possible to down load a DVD then load the music from the DVD onto a CD?
It is straight forward! I use an external DVD player(under $50), a USB capture unit(again very cheap) and some software. I connect the audio output from the DVD player to the audio in of the capture unit and plug it into a spare USB slot. I run the record software and play the DVD, the software saves the audio to a file which can be edited to cut out unwanted chat and save the tracks to individual files, then burn a music CD.
I use the EDIROL UA-1A capture hardware which may now be obsolete but a search on the net will find a suitable replacement. I use Sound Studio on a Mac to capture and edit the captured data(there is also capture hardware/software for Windows, I mainly use the setup with a turntable to convert my old Vinyl to something that I can load on my iPod.
I have the DVD of The Last Waltz
Do you mean the farewell concert by the Band? I have that DVD and think it is excellent.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
37 (
view
)
child before marriage is wrong but not sex before marriage...why?
Posted:
7/26/2009 2:46:09 PM
If marriage before legal age( 18 in most of the states)is a crime
18 is the age when a person has reached Majority and is considered an Adult and is allowed to participate in most Adult activities(excluding alcohol and gambling). Legal age is the age when you can participate(legally) in an activity and varies by the activity, you can legally drive, have sex and marry before age 18, the ages vary by state.
Marriage before legal age(as defined above) would be a crime because the couple lied about their age or the person issuing the marriage license did not verify they were entitled to marry.
shouldn't pregnancies before legal age be considered crime too
If either person was under the legal age for having sex then it is a crime - statutory rape.
If so shouldn't sex before 18 should be considered crime too?
Only is 18 is the legal age for having sex. Many states legally allow sex under 18 but quite often include an age differential, i.e. a 30 yr old male could not have sex(legally) with a 16 yr female although both could legally have sex.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
15 (
view
)
Libraries v. bookstores
Posted:
7/25/2009 1:39:34 PM
I have yet to see a bookstore that will let you mangle the magazines, spill coffee on them, and put them back on the shelves...
Here in the Atlanta area my local Barnes and Noble bookstore has a Starbucks right off the entrance and a lot of people are reading. The magazine wall has a row of benches along it's length with people sitting reading said magazines, who is going to buy a magazine the have read from cover-to-cover.
There are benches throughout the store where people sit and read books/magazines before purchase(or not at all). This practice is common in US bookstores, they must think the purchase/read-no-purchase ratio is in their favor.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
24 (
view
)
Guns a right but healthcare a privelage?
Posted:
7/25/2009 1:22:56 PM
I have never understood that mentality as to why the US still hasn't gone to a socialised healthcare system
I really wish people would stop calling it 'socialized', it's not. The free part only means you don't pay for the care at the time, you pay for it as part of your taxes. The UK has a separate entry for 'National Insurance Contribution' which means the Government is a big HMO/PPO.
with hundreds of billions that could be dumped into it every year, every person would get the same quality of treatment without being stuck on a waiting list like us Canadians have to deal with since we don't have the facilities due to a much lower influx of tax funding every year.
You have just highlighted the argument for the 'cons', funding is limited and procedures need to be managed accordingly - virtually all the counties that use a 'Nationalized Health care system' have a waiting list issue. The UK system worked well at the start but is now falling apart as the population increases and lives to a much longer age.
The same problem exists with the pension scheme, the amount somebody paid in 30-40 years age does not cover what they get now.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
15 (
view
)
Being pressured to provide my SS# for no good reason...
Posted:
7/25/2009 12:58:31 PM
This is a national firm and I’d worked with them before but in another city. They’d even found a permanent job for me in the past which means they did a reference check and a background search and no issues were found.
How would they know you were the same person? Your SS# and name would allow them to verify your identity in their database, assuming different sites had access to a central system. Their company rules may not allow them to share information.
The receptionist (who collects the forms) and the recruiter still insisted that I put down my SS# on their form. I would have provided them this information if they didn’t have it but I felt I was being pressured to provide personal information for no good reason.
You should also have been asked to prove you had the right to work in the US, copy of birth certificate or passport for US-born people, copy of Green Card or Naturalization certificate for non-US-born people. The law requires the employer verify that right.
When I changed jobs a few years ago I got a pack from HR with various Government forms to fill in including one for proof of right to work. The guidance document had two columns detailing the proof required depending if you were US born or not. I supplied a copy of my Green Card.
Should I have given my SS#?
Without it how can they correctly pass your SS deductions to the Government? No deductions no Medicare/Medicaid/retirement benefit.
I have been through the whole immigration system - Work Visa/Green Card/Naturalization and each time had to supply the same information to the same Government department, it's how it works.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
5 (
view
)
The Big Bang theory surely is the limit case ?
Posted:
7/21/2009 8:02:34 AM
OMG " it all sprang out of nothing in a single instant and for no apparent reason "
Not true! The Big Bang was only the starting point, the universe as we know it formed slowly over time and is still evolving(oops the E word!). Advanced telescopes, like Hubble, are capturing images of new galaxy's forming(actually what we see is ancient history as these images are from 1000's if light years away).
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
42 (
view
)
Evolution.
Posted:
7/20/2009 2:03:23 PM
@ aremeself...
Seen any reports about antibiotic-resistant bacteria lately...? That's evolution in action.
Look at a poodle, or a chihuahua, or a pit bull - they are products of evolution by artificial selection... so why is evolution by natural selection so hard to accept...?
The examples you quote are genetic engineering not artificial selection. Natural selection is a species adapting to its environment without external influence. We bread white mice for scientific study yet they could not live in the wild without evolving, something the animal rights groups forget when they attack a laboratory and release them!
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
40 (
view
)
Evolution.
Posted:
7/20/2009 1:51:45 PM
coveredinpaint
Also not true. Scientists have observed bacterial flagellum which have incredibly small, yet efficient, mechanical parts that function at near optimal efficiency given their size and make up. A perfectly reasonable theory is that something designed these, and that they didn't just come about out of random chance.
Not true, a theory not only tries to explain observations but puts forward hypothesis of further changes. A theory says if action A happens then reaction B will happen. If enough scientists can duplicate the experiment then the theory is plausible until someone else puts forward contradictory data. A theory is only a fact until conflicting data appears.
Evolution holds to that paradigm, ID does not!
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
37 (
view
)
Evolution.
Posted:
7/20/2009 1:20:16 PM
coveredinpaint:
In science everything is a theory until it is proved inconclusively to be so. Biology has many caveats and qualifiers because not all events can be explained.
ID is not a theory because it is not based on observation but an idea. ID was created because Creationism had too many religious connotations. The use of the word 'must' is not something that is prevalent in the scientific community, a better word is 'could'.
My background is in science, lots of physics and chemistry in school. I now write test software in the defense industry and we do not accept many things as fact. We test and retest and retest using many different scenarios until we are sure we can say "it will work very nearly all the time". I have seen test systems display problems many years after deployment because there was a set of circumstances that we had not thought of or allowed for.
A fact is only something that exists until someone disproves it.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
15 (
view
)
What would you ask?
Posted:
7/20/2009 12:53:00 PM
If the answer is forty-two, what does that mean?
The question was wrong and the Vogon fleet destroyed the Earth before it could be explained.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
34 (
view
)
Evolution.
Posted:
7/20/2009 12:23:03 PM
I believe that ID is a theory, but not evolution. Evolution is a fact.
Wrong and wrong!
Evolution is a theory based on observation and hypothesis and is still changing.
Creationism/ID is a set of statements with no backup or possibility of challenge.
In science a theory is put out there and other scientists try to prove/disprove it, recently Stephen Hawking changed his view of his own theory regarding Black Holes. A theory is never a fact, it is a set of ideas that reflect current thinking from the evidence/observations available.
Science never has a problem challenging a theory based on new evidence/observations, this is not the case with Creationism/ID which is faith-based.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
484 (
view
)
guns at home
Posted:
7/20/2009 12:04:56 PM
I don't want to be agaisnt either, but if I'm toe-toe with someone I'd rather them have a gun.
If you are toe-to-toe then they are an idiot, a gun is a safe-distance weapon - you can incapacitate them before they get close enough to disarm you. On the other side, incapacitate usually means kill - you do not train someone to aim for arms or legs, you aim for the torso which is much easier to hit but also contains many vital organs that when hit cause death.
A little background to show Brits are not all like the OP - I was born and raised in small-town rural Scotland, my grandfather had a small farm a few miles outside of town which my father and I visited most weekends. He has a shotgun, kept in the house above the fireplace, which me or my cousins were not allowed to go near(virtually all farmers had shotguns).
In Scotland there is limited trespass laws which means people can freely roam the countryside, some of whom let their dog run free. If said dog attacks the farmers sheep then he can shoot it without recourse and be compensated by the family for loss of any animals.
The big problem with burglary/home invasion is the totally idiotic laws, you are allowed to defend your home(and yourself) but are required to use only 'necessary force'. Unfortunately the courts, after the fact, then decide if the force used was necessary or excessive. Just ask the Norfolk farmer, miles from anywhere, jailed for shooting two burglars.
I don't own a gun, I moved to the US 12 yrs ago, haven't needed to which will be no help when I do need one. I have no problem owning and using one to defend myself/home, I served in the Royal Air Force and one of the first things we were taught was to safely fire a rifle - and hit the target. The annual re qualification was always a highlight of the year.
A friend I work with moved here with his wife, one of the first things they did was to purchase a gun and have her trained to use it. This was because he traveled a lot and did not want to leave her at home unprotected, apart from the firing range it so far has not been needed or used.
One misconception is that everybody in Switzerland serves in the military and has a weapon. One of my friends who worked at the same defense company spent a couple of years as a support engineer on some equipment we sold to a Swiss defense company. One day he got a letter from the Swiss government telling him to report for military training as he is living in the country. The letter also said that he could opt out of military service for a specified fee, our company paid the fee!
It's Switzerland, money talks!!!!!
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
29 (
view
)
F Bomb
Posted:
7/20/2009 8:41:01 AM
Broadcast stations sill blimp it so it seems that the FCC still has a problem with it
Since the famous 'wardrobe malfunction' on the Super Bowl half time show the FCC has got the networks paranoid. Live shows like award ceremonies are broadcast- delayed by a few seconds so that the network can censor anything they think the FCC might not like.
A few years age a fashion company in the UK had a new ad campaign, the company was French Connection UK. The ad agency thought it would be a good idea to just use the companies initials on this giant billboard - FCUK - the Advertising Standards watchdog told them to remove it.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
17 (
view
)
Evolution.
Posted:
7/20/2009 6:38:28 AM
Judging by your post, I'd say you guys in the US had better turn things around before you descend into another dark age.
We could be there already! Recently there was a big battle to have the teaching of evolution completely removed from the eduction system in the state of Kansas, the same state that previously put Darwin on trial for heresy.
Other groups have tried to have Creationism taught alongside Evolution as a scientific theory.
The problem is the school boards would rather concede than fight a costly court case.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
13 (
view
)
Evolution.
Posted:
7/20/2009 6:10:03 AM
I know that religious leaders are opposed, but they aren't enough to persuade the boards to not teach the theory.
Here in the Atlanta,GA area one mother forced her school board to put stickers in the science textbooks which read "evolution is just a theory and should be treated as such". I don't remember the exact wording but it was along those lines. Nothing was said about all the other theories in the textbook.
Another mother had all the Harry Potter books removed from the school library because they dealt with witchcraft.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
44 (
view
)
could humans be the highest form of intelligence in the universe?
Posted:
7/18/2009 1:44:24 PM
in the same sense that if we found a secret underground city, it would give credit to the thought that molemen live under us.
Interesting series on Discovery/Science channel about underground cities. They exist and nobody talks about molemen, cities get covered over and forgotten all the time and later rediscovered.
if we found life on one other body in this system it would give credit to the line of thinking.
Finding life in another body in this system is unlikely as the conditions(as we know them) are not compatible. Finding life on a planet orbiting a sun similar to ours, at a similar distance is more likely.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
42 (
view
)
could humans be the highest form of intelligence in the universe?
Posted:
7/18/2009 1:31:59 PM
As always, my way of thinking is clear- we have found no evidence that the universe is anything but hostile to the only form of life we know- we have found no evidence that the universe can sustain life outside of Earth- and we have found no evidence of intelligent life outside of the Homo genus. These facts are indisputable.
A slight correction - "these facts are CURRENTLY indisputable". WE have only observed a small percentage of the universe, to paraphrase the 'Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy' - "the universe is large, you would not believe how mind bogglingly large it is".
Images from distant stars are perhaps thousands of years old so we don't know what has happened in the interim. Scientists have recently discovered Earth-like stars with worlds that could support life(or could have!).
To assume that we are the only(or superior intelligence) in the universe is both misguided and arrogant. When we view the universe we are looking at history not current events, who knows what has happened since the light from the distant stars reached us.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
2 (
view
)
New engine in car
Posted:
7/18/2009 12:41:17 PM
I believe they are not allowed by law to change the mileage(they certainly weren't in the UK). If the mileage gauge is replaced you are probably required to disclose the actual mileage when selling the car. Remember only part of the car is brand new, anything not replaced still retains its age.
Unless the car is a Rolls Royce or a Ferrari I think you were overcharged at $10k+, with the mileage quoted it would seem the cost of repair may be more than the car is worth! Again quoting the UK, insurance companies would write-off the car if the value of the repair exceeded 50% of the car's book value.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
13 (
view
)
Should the parent(s) receive punishment for allowing their child to drive drunk?
Posted:
7/18/2009 12:18:35 PM
and so should those dolts who think their kids drinking at home is a good way to teach them to handle alcohol
I must respectfully disagree with that statement. I believe the French have got it right, for once!, children are allowed a glass of wine at meal times both in the home and at restaurants. This allows the parents to control the alcohol intake and reduce the mystique. Make something(legal) out of reach and people will want to see what they are missing. An 18 yr old who is told he is an adult, and at college, is going to try alcohol(and gambling) just because somebody says he/she can't.
Parenting should be about teaching a child how to be a responsible adult, which includes drinking responsibly. If you wait until they are a (full)adult then you have lost that parental control.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
12 (
view
)
Should the parent(s) receive punishment for allowing their child to drive drunk?
Posted:
7/18/2009 11:54:33 AM
I don't know of any state whose law makes the age of majority older than 18. I doubt it could--it would be unconstitutional for any state to require people to be older than 18 to vote, for example. And the law can't make a parent liable for what someone who's not a minor child in their care does. The 18-year old who gets drunk and drives is no less responsible for the consequences than someone 28 or 48 who does it.
Unfortunately the is not as quite clear as you state, here is information from the net -
There are several definitions depending whether you're dealing with a state or federal law. Here are the most commonly accepted definitions of minors, children and juveniles:
Minors or Minority Definition:
The term generally refers to anyone who has not reached full age to vote, buy alcoholic beverages, join the military, sign legal contracts and and so forth. Exactly when someone is a minor depends on the issue at hand.
An 18 year old is considered an adult when voting, joining the military, signing credit contracts and so forth.
Only people 21 years of age can purchase alcohol thus a 20 year old is still a minor in this category.
Minority is the preferred legal term because it encompasses the full range of persons who fall into underage categories such as children, infant, juvenile, young person, pupil and so forth.
Children or Child Definition:
A person who has not reached the age of 14 is considered a "child of tender age". Just to clarify, children lose their status as a child of tender age on their 14th birthday. However, in some jurisdictions the term includes children up to the age of 21 in areas such as child custody and child support.
Juvenile Definition:
Generally this refers to people between the ages of 14 and 17. They lose their juvenile status on their 18th birthday.
The age of majority was set by Federal law in 1972 as an outgrowth of protests during the Vietnam War. Congress, after much hullaballoo, decided and agreed with the people, that if you were old enough to go to war, and die for your country, then you should have all of the rights and privileges of adults who, before 1972, had to be 21 years of age. So, in 1972, the law was changed to 18 years of age for "most" privileges - buying alcohol, gambling, etc., being notable exceptions to the 18 years of age law.
So it would seem that an 18 yr old is an adult, except when drinking and gambling which makes parental responsibility very difficult unless they are witness to these exceptions.
I think the law requires changing, an adult is an adult and should be afforded ALL privileges of an adult. They should also be prepared to suffer the consequences of breaching these privileges.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
8 (
view
)
Should the parent(s) receive punishment for allowing their child to drive drunk?
Posted:
7/18/2009 10:32:10 AM
The Law needs to do a better job making individuals more responsible for making their own decisions.
I agree, many states/cities have laws that require the bartender to monitor and limit the customers drinking.
If you make the parents accountable for the childs decision then the child isn't accountable for his mistake.
Sorry I still have trouble with this whole child/adult. An 18 yr old is allowed to vote, in fact he/she can do anything an 'adult' can do except drink alcohol. Why should parents be legally responsible for an 18-21 yr old when the vast majority of them could be on the other side of the country attending college?
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
4 (
view
)
Should the parent(s) receive punishment for allowing their child to drive drunk?
Posted:
7/18/2009 10:06:42 AM
In the UK he would have already lost his driving license for at least a year as a result of the first DUI. An 18 yr old is not underage in the UK and is classed as an adult, he would then be prosecuted as an adult.
I find it strange that 20 yr old is not classed as an adult but can serve in the military in a war zone, and die serving his country.
Your scenario give wait to the argument that said parents, and Junior, should be sterilized to avoid further contaminating the Gene Pool.
Edit: I need a grammar checker - weight not wait!
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
2 (
view
)
Advertisments and profile
Posted:
7/18/2009 9:42:06 AM
You selected Male in the email restrictions, this means you will not see your profile in a search.
After you login you will see two lines of links in blue and underlined, in the middle of the row you will see - Profile: view edit - select view and you will see your profile as we see it, edit of course allows you to change it.
As a comment I thought the picture you chose was too dark and I couldn't make out much detail.
Oh and welcome to the crazy world of PoF.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
112 (
view
)
If s/he has never been married that's a major red flag
Posted:
7/18/2009 7:42:49 AM
You are from the same generation I am. So, after high school most girls in our age group either got married or went to work. Very few went to college. You obviously chose work.
Sounds to me like a generation living in the past! I am originally from the UK where full time education was mandatory until age 16 with the option of continuing for a further year or even a second until age 18 which I did. Half my classmates in my final year were female and taking science courses, the majority also went on to college.
Brainwashing kids into believing girls should either be married or working after high school seem very****nsian, that sort of thinking went out the window after WWII(at least in the UK!).
I don't think I'm broken, flawed, etc. So what gives with the red flags and the older crowd!
I'm with you magic fish, just because I never married does not mean I didn't have relationships. Marriage for me in my 20' and 30's was not a good option for me as I joined the Royal Air Force after high school which involved moving ever few years. Even in my civilian career, with a large defense contractor, I would often have to work away from home for extended periods.
It is only now, in later life, as a co-founder and owner of a small business that I can vastly reduce my amount of traveling and hopefully build a long-term relationship.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
9 (
view
)
Are we being programmed for future shock?
Posted:
7/16/2009 11:56:07 AM
We see hear and read science fiction and fantasy stories that later on do not seem to be as far fetched, or imaginative as when they originally came out? Are we being subliminally conditioned for future events and encounters? Or mere farsighted coincidences?
The 'Big Three' of science fiction, Azimov/Clarke/Heinlein, all had scientific backgrounds. The stories they wrote were extrapolations of their current knowledge. Many of these stories inspired people to try to bring that fiction into reality.
Azimov acknowledges that the founder of a company that manufactures industrial robots was inspired by his robot stories(which were based, by his own admition, on a 19th century story).
Gene Roddenberry, creator of Star Trek which he called "wagon train to the stars", admitted that he created the 'transporter' as a device to reduce time/budget costs in getting the actors from the spaceship to the planet yet today scientists are trying to bring it to reality.
Cell phones, computer voice control, etc. are all things a writer thought up as a good storyline that others made into reality!
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
22 (
view
)
International Space Station
Posted:
7/16/2009 11:34:35 AM
Place the same kind of effort that was poured into WW2, where R+D research was pushed in ALL sectors. (Some poster felt R+D was shut off during the war...nothing further from the truth.That loses wars, which the Germans and the Japanese both found out!)
Development was accelerated on certain pre-war research but that was on viable programs. The German efforts on the jet engine and V-1, V-2 projects diverted funds and resources which could have helped in the war effort(fortunately for us good guys).
The Axis lost due to incompetence(Hitler was a nut-job) and numbers(the US could have invaded and defeated Japan without the A-bomb due to numerical superiority and greater resources, the bomb served to reduce Allied casualties).
Did America "go broke" then? No, of course not...it came out with a very healthy economy. With a space program....
America, because of it's size and geographical location, was able to produce equipment and supplies which it sold to it's allies without suffering the devastating destruction they did. The Space Race was only possible because America had access to German rocket scientists who had developed the V rocket programs.
The jet engine did not become useful until post-war when proper R&D could be applied to the task.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
22 (
view
)
War and Lies
Posted:
7/16/2009 10:42:31 AM
And now we have another endless war...terror...it fuels the military industrial complex...how fitting since the USSR no longer exists.
The 'War on Terror' does not help the 'military industrial complex'(wasn't that a Soviet expression) as there is not easily identifiable enemy. The Warsaw Pact countries of the Cold War were known, their troop movements could be monitored, their bases were fixed. All the 'War on Terror' has done is to increase Government expenditure on Nation Security with no real benefit to the US citizens(apart from a false sense of security).
Just look at the problems the UK had with the IRA in Northern Ireland and mainland Britain. It is very difficult to fight an enemy you can't identify, both sides looked the same, both sides talked the same. The "Troubles" lasted over 30 years and this is on an island that could be dropped in most US states and not be noticed!
V-1, V-2, long (er) range bombers, atomic bomb, radar....all fueled by R&D during wartime...
I said R&D was reduced during wartime to divert resources to production. Many of the examples you quote were in the research stage before war broke out, they were just pushed into accelerated development. The V-1 and V-2 projects were a last throw of the device by a desperate country on the edge of defeat and were ineffective. The real R&D on these projects was done during the Space Race.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
21 (
view
)
War and Lies
Posted:
7/16/2009 10:20:31 AM
The cold War...all kinds of economic benefits, because it was on a broad scale.
The Cold War was mainly a bloodless war, Korea and Vietnam were to use your expression "bush fires" where both sides could try out their new toys.
check the numbers for yourself...the 1930's were horrible...and no end in sight...until WW2 broke out.
These small "bushfire" wars we have now are nothing compared to real all out wars, which is where the economy gets greatly affected.
The economic effect varied dramatically among the various participants.
The US had a positive benefit due to the fact it was an exporter of equipment and supplies. It also lost a lot of that gain rebuilding Germany.
The UK economy was worse post-war than pre-war as it had to pay for all the equipment purchased from the US under the Lend/Lease program(it took several decades!). There was also the infrastructure rebuilding, many cities were heavily damaged by bombing - something the US were spared.
France had major rebuilding to do as a result of the fighting following D-Day.
(West)Germany was a pile of rubble, the economy was in the toilet. If the US had not poured millions of dollars into restoring the infrastructure under the Marshall Plan then we would probably have fought WWIII by now.
Bottom line, extended periods of tension(threat of major war) are more beneficial to the economy than actually fighting one.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
9 (
view
)
War and Lies
Posted:
7/15/2009 1:22:29 PM
Hey...I always thought it was a bit of an oxymoron. But...war makes jobs, strengthens the economy.
Actually it is the threat of war that makes jobs and strengthens the economy. During the Cold War both sides were always trying to find a new and better way of destroying the other so money was funneled into Research and Development along with manufacturing. Look what happened after the Berlin Wall fell, countries discovered a 'Peace Dividend', cut back on R&D, reduced troop numbers, retired equipment. The net result, defense contractors shed thousands of jobs and the economy tanked!
In war R&D is reduced, money goes to maintenance of equipment and replenishment of supplies which only benefits a small section of the manufacturing industry.
Nobody has a better idea. Except for the speace program. Too many people oppose heavily funding it, because they mistakenly think it is a waste.
The 60's Space Race, initiated by JFK, was very beneficial with many technologies filtering down to the consumer market. I'm not sure we are seeing the same overall benefit from current space programs, the ISS and satellite programs are not producing new technologies that can be used to enhance the consumer.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
8 (
view
)
IE8 losing or dropping session state?
Posted:
7/14/2009 1:15:44 PM
Appart than the inevitable "just switch" I'm going to get, I can't because of other stuff (work).
Have you tried Safari? I use Safari v4 for Windows at work with no problems. I also run Safari and Firefox at home on an iMac, no IE support after the Tiger upgrade, and again have no problems.
I can access Internet Banking using Safari and connect to my work PC using Logmein using either Safari or Firefox.
There are other browsers out there you could try, Google Chrome(never tried it) or Netscape(never tried it but a friend at works swears by it).
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
12 (
view
)
Help with open ports
Posted:
7/10/2009 1:25:06 PM
Thrums, my only alternative to them is t-mobile which wants a 2 year contract. The problem is there is no other cable/internet provider contract free in this part of Kentucky that l am aware of.
Icandy: check out - www.earthlink.net - they are nationwide. They provide high-speed internet access using DSL(Digital Subscriber Line) which means they use your phone line to access the internet(this is not dial-up). They install a device in your phone company's exchange that allows you to access the internet without affecting your phone service.
Just go to the link, enter your home phone number and they will tell you if the service is available(the deciding factor is your distance from the exchange, too far and it won't work). I don't believe there is a contract period although there is probably a connection fee, I've been with them for over 10 years and have never encountered any of the problems you described in the original post.
Just for the record I have no affiliation with them or receive any reward(financial gain) for recommending them I am just relating my experiences.
l tell you, l have never seen so many clueless people in one place in my life!
There may just as many at other providers, including the one I recommended, it's just I have not encountered the same problems and had to deal with the 'support'. As an aside, this email is being sent using an iMac which I believe my provider does not actively support!
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
19 (
view
)
Hijabs, Burqas and Niqabs - is it right in the western world
Posted:
7/10/2009 12:51:54 PM
We ban Motorcycle helmets from areas of payment in our shops and i am sure if i dressed in black entered my bank with a balaclava hiding my face i would meet some resistance and rightly so.]/quote]
Yes! because they think you are going to rob them while trying to hide your identity from the security cameras. The ban on motorcycle helmets is purely for security reasons and has nothing to do with this thread.
The way we are,our laws ,our way of life,what the majority find normal is not respected by wearers of head scarf's,balaclavas or hoodies .
During the 40's and 50's the majority of women in the UK wore head scarfs(including my mother) watch any movies depicting that era! Balaclavas are very useful items of clothing especially in winter in norther Scotland(I believe they were very popular with Scott's expedition in Antarctica!!!). I believe the anorak brigade(train spotters) of the 60's were the originators of the 'hoodie'.
They should be banned on the basis that they are not sociably acceptable in the western world and wearers give the impression of an unwillingness to communicate to the society they live in.
The majority decide the Goverment/Law so if the majority dont wear and you want to be part of there society then intergrate with your new neighbours and communicate in the way they do and we will all get on just fine.
Define 'sociably acceptable'? Here in Georgia(USA) you are only required to have a license plate displayed on the rear of the vehicle so may people display something else on the front. I have seen many Union Flags, Welsh Dragons, Scottish Saltires(white X-shaped cross on blue background) and Lion Rampant's where the front license plate would be. Why is that any different to an item of national costume(here Highland Games are very popular with many people wearing kilts who have never been to Scotland and who's ancestors left there several generations ago)
Cinco de Meyo(not sure of the spelling) is a very popular holiday/celebration here(Mexican origin) as is St. Patrick's day(Irish).
People can integrate into a society without completely giving up their cultural heritage.
Respect our culture and we will respect yours.
What is YOUR culture, is that of the Anglos, Saxons, Normans or Vikings not forgetting all the other citizens of the former empire who choose to make the UK home. Integration means adding your culture to what is already there and creating something a little different not throwing it away completely and adopting something new.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
5 (
view
)
Firesale!
Posted:
7/10/2009 11:51:12 AM
a little sub can go and cut a cable, or someone can take down a satellite.
There was a case about 7 or 8 years ago where there was a major accident and fire in a interstate tunnel(somewhere in the New York/New Jersey area) which damaged a large internet cable link. The resultant loss/slowness of service was quite significant until repairs could be made.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
8 (
view
)
Fuzzy Logic
Posted:
7/10/2009 11:39:38 AM
In the United States, you are allowed to vote only if you are 18 years of age or older. Now consider two teenagers, virtually identical in every respect, except one of the teenagers just celebrated his eighteenth birthday yesterday, while the other teenager will be celebrating his eighteenth birthday tomorrow. Today is election day. And even though the two teenagers are virtually identical in every respect, only one of them is allowed to vote -- a clear violation of the Directive of Equality! If one of two virtually identical teenagers is granted a right to vote, then the other teenager should also be granted a similar voting right. But not so in America!
Actually the answer is neither is allowed to vote. To vote you must be 18(as stated) but you must register on or after your 18th birthday, supply in proof that you are entitled to vote(over 18, US citizen). Once registered you must wait to get a voters registration card(normally sent via the United States Postal Service - USPS) after verification of your right to vote.
Many States/Counties/Cities require such registration to occur several weeks/months prior to the election so by the next election both teens are probably registered and entitled to vote.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
8 (
view
)
Help with open ports
Posted:
7/10/2009 11:26:12 AM
Forgive the length but l really need some help here. 3 months ago, my internet/cable provided shut off my service due to open ports. The abuse department runs scans and when they find ports open they cut you off to get your attention. To date they have cut me off 3 times.
OP: It's time you cut them off! Sounds like the 'abuse department' is run by a bunch of control freaks. My internet access is DSL(high-speed internet over the phone line) hosted by Mindspring(Earthlink) and I have never had a problem with them over open ports(I used to run a website(port 80), non-commercial in line with their usage policy, until the PC hosting it died. I also use web cams to monitor access to my yard utilizing port that your provider would probably complain about.
There are 9 ports open and l have done all they asked me to do, wiped hard drive, bypassed wireless, reset Windows firewall to default and installed a new anti-virus prg with additional firewalls.
Dump then, I would also send them a bill for all the wasted time you spent and any unnecessary software you purchased.
The cable company wants the ports closed. Okay so do l
They are as clueless as l am. This is not good.
Dump them! Switch to another provider that will let you get on with your life without this hassle.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
7 (
view
)
What DoI Do Next?WinXP Issues
Posted:
7/10/2009 11:04:44 AM
My Dell Inspiron laptop is so slow, I don't know whether to retire it-its 4-5 years old, and so slow, its ridiculous.
It sounds like a memory issue. Check the Dell website to see the type and maximum amount of RAM your model can have and install that, buy it from the usual suspects(Best Buy, CompUSA, MicroCenter, etc.) rather than Dell - it will be cheaper.
Do a full cleanup, remove startup programs that are not needed, delete unused applications, empty the caches and temp directory(should be c:\documents and settings\ \local settings\temp - I think that is correct, going from memory as I type this on a Mac). Perform a disk defrag(start menu, accessories, system tools, disk defragment). You should also convert the file system to NTFS, which is better than FAT and enable file compression. RAM operations are faster than disk operations so loading a smaller file from disk and de-compressing in memory is faster than loading a larger file from disk(in most cases).
Worst case, save all important data and do a reinstall with a disk reformat.
Is it time for the office supply store tune up
Never, they will only do what the knowledgeable people on this forum will tell you to do but for FREE!
I need something electronic to edit videos
If your main use is video editing and you need to replace your current computer then I would suggest a MacBook Pro, iMac or a Mac Mini. Any of those are far superior to a Windows PC for video, The Mac Mini can use the same mouse/keyboard/monitor as a PC, the mouse and keyboard need to be USB(it only costs a few bucks to buy a PS2 to USB converter) the Mini comes with a converter that allows the use of a VGA monitor.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
14 (
view
)
Finally a Country with some balls
Posted:
7/8/2009 2:51:52 PM
Some of them do live in Switzerland, as many of the rich can afford more than one residence.
Not a chance!!!! Switzerland has one of the highest tax rates in the world and I talk from experience. In the late 80's my company sold test equipment to a Swiss company, part of the deal was a Tech Rep would be based in Zurich(where the company was/is) to handle support. Because the Tech Rep was to be long term(several years) he was housed in an apartment rather than a hotel. As he has a Swiss address he was told he had to serve in the Swiss army(all Swiss citizens are members of the army and keep weapons at home) or for a fee he could opt out.
He was also told that he would have to pay tax on his UK home as he was not living in it. The argument was he could rent it out while in Switzerland and therefor had to pay tax even if he did not rent it out.
The original quote is out of date, it has been reported on the BBC website several months ago. The argument is that Swiss law(as opposed to virtually other country) regards tax evasion as a civil offense and is different to tax fraud which is a criminal offense. What the US government is trying to do is persuade the Swiss to treat tax evasion the same as tax fraud. This will then allow them to prosecute people who submit a fraudulent tax return which those with Swiss bank accounts are doing.
It does not matter what you think of the US tax laws, breaking them is a criminal offense and you should be prosecuted. Al Capone killed many people but he got caught for tax evasion, go figure!
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
67 (
view
)
Break into someone's home. Forfeit your life?
Posted:
7/8/2009 1:14:01 PM
The reason some people get convicted of murder is for two justifiable reasons:
1) They pursued the person off the property and then killed the perp. If the guy is running away (especially off the property) then he no longer poses a threat to you and you are committing a murder.
I agree.
2) The homeowner deliberately ambushes the perp. If you here someone trying to get into your home and you hide beside the door, wait for the punk to gain entry, and then promptly blow his brains out then you committed a murder.
I disagree.
The law is viewed from the perspective of what a reasonable and prudent person would do in the same circumstances. Most reasonable and prudent people would not do either of the two scenarios above.
Most prudent people would do the second action. Someone is breaking into your home, they might be armed with anything, identifying yourself makes you a target. If possible call 911 but only if it does not reveal your location, remember they are not there to sell you a Time Life subscription!
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
56 (
view
)
Women only first contact week on POF?
Posted:
7/8/2009 12:11:38 PM
If a woman is interested, she will fav you, she will view you multiple times....she WILL show you she is interested.
This is the problem, not all of us understand the subtle hints that women use which usually ends with us being in the doghouse! Many men use the favourites list as a bookmark for women they may eventually contact and assume the women think in the same way(big mistake!!!).
The women on here need to get together and publish a guide book to allow us men to correctly read, interpret and respond correctly to their hints/actions. Of course if we understood everything there would be no conflict and no subsequent 'making up'
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
19 (
view
)
Question regarding pedophiles and the law
Posted:
7/7/2009 3:51:22 PM
Correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I have read and heard, it is my understanding that a pedophile cannot be rehabilitated. IF that is true, and a convicted pedophile receives a less than "Life In Prison" sentence, (i.e., 5-10-20 years) why do we release them?
It is a flaw of the system the prison system is not about rehabilitation, it is about punishment. You commit a crime, you are caught, you are convicted, you serve your sentence, you are released(apart from capital offenses). The system has no choice but to release them.
Given the nature of the crime, it isn't like a bank robber recommitting the same offense. This is releasing a person that we know will hurt/sexually abuse/kill an innocent child, and the only question is when.
As above the system has no choice but to release them, the only difference is there is not a register of bank robbers, muggers, etc. These people have been deemed to have paid their debt to society and are free to continue their lives.
If a pedophile is required to be placed on a sex offenders register which anyone can view then why is that person released back into society? If the pedophile is barred from being within x yards of a place where children congregate(like a school) why is he allowed back into society where he can break that restriction?
If a convicted pedophile is still deemed to be a danger to society then why is he released back into that society without any safeguards to monitor his activities?
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
31 (
view
)
Naturalized Citizenship For Illegal Aliens
Posted:
7/7/2009 2:07:07 PM
My ex-neighbor is from Germany. He has been in this country for over 40 years and he has his greencard. People who have greencards need to either be required to become citizens after a period or time or return to their countries of origin. .
There was talk a couple of years ago about the INS limiting the number of times you could renew your Green Card before you had to either leave or apply for citizenship, I don't know if they did anything or not.
Being in this country for over 40 years and not being a citizen is insane
It's not really insane, it can take several years to get the Green Card and then you must wait 5 years before applying for citizenship(actually 4 years and 9 months as you can start the process 90 days early). I arrived here in Nov. 1997 and got my citizenship Dec 2005, 8 years later. That was fast, my company started the Green Card process within a couple of months of my arrival and I started the citizenship process as soon as I could. In fact I started the paperwork early so I could submit it at the first opportunity.
Some people are quite happy to remain a Resident Alien, the major difference between that and citizenship is that a citizen can vote and hold a US passport. In my case citizenship was important because I am committed to living here and wish to vote(and have done on every occasion since). I work in the defense industry so citizenship is required to enter certain defense contractor facilities or military bases, it also allows me to obtain a security clearance which means I can work on more projects.
thrums
Joined:
7/28/2007
Msg:
30 (
view
)
Naturalized Citizenship For Illegal Aliens
Posted:
7/7/2009 1:43:52 PM
Speaking of "not quite right"... your supposed advantage to duel citizenship cracks me up.
It was meant to be funny, next time I'll use the appropriate smiley.
Citizens of the US aren't deported, Einstein! That is one of the advantages of citizenship.
There are two levels if citizenship, someone born in the US is automatically a citizen and cannot be deported. This is why pregnant women try to cross the border to have the child on US soil knowing the authorities would never separate mother and child.
Naturalization is something given by the authorities, INS, and can be taken away as the result of criminal activity among other things. Once citizenship is removed that person can then be deported to their country of origin or whoever will take them.
The UK government clearly states on their web site that if a duel-citizen(i.e. UK to US) commits a crime in the other country they will not help.
Show ALL Forums