online dating service
REGISTER | MAIL/PROFILE | HELP | NOW ONLINE | SEARCH | RATING | FORUMS | SUCCESS STORIES

 

     
Posted In Forum:
Home   login   MyForums  
Show ALL Forums  
 
 Author Thread: Case against Jesus’ existence dismissed
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 64 (view)
 
Case against Jesus’ existence dismissed
Posted: 2/16/2006 4:38:31 AM
Rio Orinoco


What is being discussed is that you say you have a method of measuring if a person is Christian or not.


It’s not my system. It is Christ who says “love thy neighbour”. Am I to ignore this? Hasn’t Christ set a standard? When Christ forgave a sinner Christ didn’t then say “follow your conscience and motive”. Christ said “and don’t sin again”. How does a Christian know how not to sin again if a Christian don’t have a guide, or something to measure by? The measure is contained in the scriptures and the guidance of the Holy Spirit?

Christ gave us an example to follow. If we don’t follow Christ’s teachings, then the poster rory27 has a valid point, in that Christians can take part in the holocaust, steal, persecute and still regard themselves as Christians worthy to be saved. Truly Christ is right when he said there will come a day when people who call on the name of Christ will think that to kill is doing a service to Christ.

So if Christ can have that insight into how to conduct one’s self, then that is a measuring rod in which I should also set my standards towards.


The main point being, that measuring/ judging is not up to us. Judge not??? got a familiar ring?


What does that mean? You introduce a strawman argument by linking measuring with judgement.

If I see a person kill another person and then in the next breath say “I am a Christian”. Am I just supposed to ignore this and turn a blind eye? By me telling him or her that they are doing wrong and not living up to the standard of Christ is a good thing. I haven’t judged. Only God will judge. I have consistently used the “measuring rod” analogy to indicate to yourself that you will know who is a Christian and who denies the spirit of Christ.

If you have your own standards that you measure yourself by then that is your decision. You can walk by that decision, but you will not be exempt from judgement by the secular world. As a believer in Christ I’m not going to judge you. God will judge you. But if I kill and then say that I am a Christian what does that make me in the sight of Christ, a person worthy to enter the kingdom of heaven? Not at all.


laurelee


I submit, its a paper thin argument that has no weight. Secondly, a Christian is a person professing belief in Jesus as Christ or following the religion based on the life and teachings of Jesus. A Christian manifests the qualities or spirit of Jesus and are Christlike. Showing a loving concern for others and are humane. Now based on this are you saying that anyone who knowingly was involved in causing the persecution and mass-murder of people are Christian? We know the measuring rod of how we can test a person as to whether they are Christian
****************************************************************************

shame on you , service. never leave yourself open with a cliche they can nail you on...lol


What is so cliché about that? For that matter what is shameful about it?
Are you saying that :

- A Christian should not profess a belief in Christ?
- A Christian should not follow the life and teachings of Christ?
- A Christian should not manifest the qualities or spirit of Christ and be Christlike?
- A Christian should not show a loving concern for others or be humane?

So are you going to replace this with “follow your conscience and motive” as you mentioned in one of your post above?

Well Hitler followed his conscience and his motive. Was that okay?

There must be some measure for how you follow your conscience or motives? Or is conscience and motive like the wind blowing in any direction that it pleases?
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 57 (view)
 
Case against Jesus’ existence dismissed
Posted: 2/13/2006 8:06:46 PM
^^^^

Then I repeat my question, what do you measure yourself by (if you are a Christian)? If it’s by the spirit are you saying that an understanding of who Christ was and is, is irrelevant? If Christ says love your neighbour then is that irrelevant to you?

If you are not a Christian then the question doesn't really apply.

Also how did I become synonymous with a measuring rod? I quoted a description of a Christian. If you want to see where I got the definition from then go to http://www.answers.com/topic/christian
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 55 (view)
 
Case against Jesus’ existence dismissed
Posted: 2/13/2006 7:45:17 PM
Seems the measuring of souls is the job of higher powers according to bible, not to individuals who would like to take that job.


Well without the bible how would you know what is expected of you? Isn't that part of the measuring rod?
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 54 (view)
 
Case against Jesus’ existence dismissed
Posted: 2/13/2006 7:40:36 PM
Not including atheists into the equation? Straw man arguement that doesn't merit further comment.


Why is it a straw man argument? Isn’t the thread also about atheists?


Or are you such an idea-twisting apologist that you can equate joblessness with the extirmination of 6 million people?


Now this is a straw man argument. Where did I say joblessness caused the extermination of 6 million people? I stated the depressed economy helped Hitler and his ideas come to power. It is you who seems to have established this link.


And he knew that those same protestants would have to be the ones to willingly usher the Jews to their deaths. Who else would do it? The Aryans?


How about the German people? Yet again you are Nero in spirit.


"Just seems your opinion." I see...the shameless actions on record of Christians during the Holocaust affair is "opinion" .... so much for a reasonable debate.


There you go again without any understanding of what a Christian is. There were different kinds of Christians in Germany. The Christians you seem to be talking about were called “German Christians” who tried to mix their brand of Christian understanding with the Nazi party. Although the Nazi hierarchy rejected them. And you still haven’t answered the question. Why did the “Atheist German” tolerate this?



Now I am blaming the Christian nations? America, i.e.? Complete hysterical assumption and delusion on your part.



Your blaming Christian’s so doesn’t that include Christians no matter where they reside? If you are not then you are clearly making a distinction between one Christian and another Christian. Which bears my point, in that, you know who a Christian is by the measuring rod. But what is the measuring rod of an atheist?



I've already alluded to what I consider a Christian to be. Someone who, whatever the actual moral compass of their lives are, for better or worse, accept Jesus as their Saviour, worship in Church, have faith


A Christian is not what you say is a Christian but what the founder says i.e. Jesus Christ. Faith alone is not enough. Why do you think Christ said “love your neighbour”? Doesn’t that require action?


Your analagous link with Paul is ridiculous…..

Again, your arguement is a dishonest and morally equivocating one: when a Christian does a good deed, you revere him or her, and praise Christianity for pointing the way; when a Christian tortures, mocks, and kills, you say they're automatically not a Christian. I don't accept that one-sided, free-pass theology.


So are you saying that a person who tortures, mocks and kills is a Christian? Who is deluding who? We know by Christ’s standards that those who does these things will never enter the kingdom of heaven. But what is the theology of an atheist? Is an atheist still an atheist if he kills? Is an atheist an atheist if he does good?



It is at this point that I wonder why I spend time in a lengthy debate with one who either can't comprehend previous posts, or who is so blinded by an unquestionable one-sided faith in Christianity, that he willingly twists the simplest, the most basic of information I set out.


But you haven’t set out any information. You just keep reiterating that it was Christians who was active in the holocaust and in Nazism and it was they who are the culprits, failing miserably to identify the groups that were in Germany at the time. One set were called “German Christians” who tried to co-exist with Nazism, who were a minority of Christians.



More atheist comments. See my first comment, and my very first post on this thread. Then add to it this: every single person on this Earth has the potential for evil, whether they are a Christian, Muslim, pagan, atheist, Buddhist, whatever...


First thing I agree with you on. i.e we are all sinners.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 50 (view)
 
Case against Jesus’ existence dismissed
Posted: 2/13/2006 6:33:54 PM

You say there is a measuring rod for who is a Christian.
If so, Judgement Day will not be requiring the help of any power higher than grade school to weigh souls, a simple reading of this measuring rod you tell of will tell the tale, the rest is just a formality


Are you saying that there isn’t a measuring rod? If there isn’t then how do we know whether we are on the right path or not? And if you are a believer how do you know you are on the right path if you have nothing to measure yourself by?
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 49 (view)
 
Case against Jesus’ existence dismissed
Posted: 2/13/2006 6:17:52 PM
You seem to be argueing on a technical detail, that wars-- Iran-Iraq, and Hitler's insanity-- that weren't started in the name of Christ therefore excuses Christians (or Muslims, or whatever is the ideology or religion of the day) from the complex unfolding of what goes on during those so-called "non-religious" wars. Again, it's a disingenuous approach.


Firstly its not technical, it’s fact i.e. they weren’t started in the name of Christ. Secondly, I’m not excluding, so called Christians attitudes (I give you a measuring rod to test if someone is Christian or not), but it seems that you are doing the exclusions by seemingly excluding atheists from the equation.



Your approach fails even in this "letter but not spirit" of the discussion, anyway: as I've pointed out, anti-Semitism paved Hitler's way into power


Well anti-Semitism was one of the excuses. The depressed economy and joblessness played an important role in bringing him to power.



so Christians played their very significant part as co-catalysts of the Nazi regime


This is absolute nonsense. What proof do you have of this? As I exposed to you in my earlier post Hitler despised Christian’s, but as a group he had to tolerate them. If you are implying that the Pope and his shady dealings speaks for all Christians then you are extremely mistaken.


If you listen to the totality of Hitler's furious podium tirades, his emotional constant was his hallucination of a mysterious "master Aryan race", blue eyes, blond hair, model looks, powerful build. I don't know about you, but I haven't seen too many blue-eyed, blond-haired Jews lately.


Hitler was an admirer of Darwins theory of evolution. Nazism openly proclaimed its dependence on Darwin. It was right and moral for the strongest race to survive; to have pity for the weak was to defy nature’s laws.

Evolutionist Sir Arthur Keith wrote: ‘The German Führer, as I have consistently maintained, is an evolutionist; he has consciously sought to make the practice of Germany conform to the theory of evolution.’ Evolution and Ethics, Putnam, New York, p. 230, 1947



As to your arguement that "those weren't real Christians because they weren't peaceful, loving," etc.... sorry, but you can't have it both ways. When Christians undertake brave deeds, dispense forgiveness, contribute to a healthy civilization, I would agree that that is fantastic. Seriously. Bravo for them. When they persecute, or cynically allow,the persecution of innocents based on a difference in ethnic or religious affiliation, that is a root and direct religious/ethical choice. They are still Christians, and are responsible for their actions.


Here again you mistakenly or refuse to understand what a Christian is. I’ve already given you the measuring rod. But let’s go further. One of the most famous apostles in Christendom was Paul. You could say before he became a Christian he was Hitler-Like. He persecuted, killed, and tortured Christians mercilessly. Now once he became a Christian do you think he would have still been a Christian if after becoming one he went back to his old Hitler-like ways? Certainly not! The apostles Peter, John, Matthew etc would certainly not have accepted this. But we know that Christ said that there will be people who call on his name but Christ on his return will say that he never knew them.

You still haven't mentioned what the measuring rod is for an atheist. Why did atheists stand by and allowed Hitler to do what he did?



As for your equally facile comment that my arguement "has no weight", well.... if you can't refute any of the specific arguements here with a historical perspective-- not technical non-starters


So providing facts to these wars you term “technical” yet what are you providing? It seems just your opinion.


I'd direct you to the historical record of the Holocaust story, as well as the long, sordid history of anti-Semitism as it first appears with the Church Fathers.


So now you are inferring the Church Fathers had something to do with the Holocaust. Well weren’t the church fathers incorporated in the Allies who liberated Europe and the Jews from the tyranny of Hitler? Your argument carries no weight at all. Infact your argument sounds like the Emperor Nero of old who blamed the burning of Rome on the Christians.



And to preclude the dismissal that any such history is from biased atheists, check out the ones from Catholic theologians, protestant ministers, and other non-denominational Christians.


It’s you who are the one that’s precluding atheists from this and trying to portray Nazism as Christianity. This is totally absurd. I think it’s you who needs a history lesson to find out who it was that liberated Europe. You will find it’s the very same “Christian” Allies that you so easily and incorrectly blame for atrocities by Hitler and his henchmen, who certainly weren't Christian.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 40 (view)
 
Case against Jesus’ existence dismissed
Posted: 2/12/2006 9:31:19 AM
rory27


Yes, Iraq started the eight year Iran-Iraq war, and although, technically, Saddam and his gang were secular, he cleverly, like a practised demagogue, needed something to fire up the scared, illiterate young troops-- hence the repeated calls of a "righteous" war, "God's call", and the like



You seem to be indicating that a war started in a non-religious way and was non-religious, becomes religious because Saddam used repeated calls of a “righteous” war or “God’s call” to incite illiterate young troops to fight.

Religion and secular motives (i.e. one race is inferior to another) will be used by evil men and women as a tool to get the populous to do their will. But by their very actions we know that a person who claims to be religious is not remotely religious, if the religion teaches non-violence and peace and their actions are to kill and cause injustice. The Muslim religion has to answer for its mis-guided actions, but Saddam was not a particularly religious person and he started his war-mongering based on power and wealth.


(this in the context of your post, once again, where you lumped in "non"- religious conflict.)


I gave examples of wars in the last century and this century that were not religious but secular in nature. If you want to post wars which are religious in nature then you are welcome to do so. The most well-known religious conflicts are the Northern Ireland problems and the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. We now have the Al-Qaeda terrorist movement, but these conflicts although mis-guided are no match in the taking of human life and atrocities that for example, (Pol Pot, Hitler, Rwanda, Royal family of the first World War, Stalin’s and Lenin’s killing of millions of people, Mao’s reign of terror that resulted in the deaths of tens of millions) indulged in.


As to your facile arguement that there were others-- atheists, non-Christian religionists amongst the German populace-- I submit, this is either an extremely ill-informed "creative" historical wrenching of the record, or it is disingenuous.


Firstly, your statement does not rebuff anything I said. I submit, its a paper thin argument that has no weight. Secondly, a Christian is a person professing belief in Jesus as Christ or following the religion based on the life and teachings of Jesus. A Christian manifests the qualities or spirit of Jesus and are Christlike. Showing a loving concern for others and are humane. Now based on this are you saying that anyone who knowingly was involved in causing the persecution and mass-murder of people are Christian? We know the measuring rod of how we can test a person as to whether they are Christian or not.

But what is an atheists measuring rod?

Every citizen in Germany who accepted Nazism and stood by silently whether they were Christian in words only, atheist, etc had their responsibility in the horrors that took place. This was the reality and to blame Christians for Nazism is ill-informed and disingenuous especially when the Nazi philosophy and actions didn’t have a single Christian characteristic about it.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 36 (view)
 
Case against Jesus’ existence dismissed
Posted: 2/11/2006 11:37:24 PM
The religious roots in the Holocaust and the complicity of the church certainly put the lie in your statement that religion had nothing to do with WWII.


Hitler was an ambitious and clever man and he used groups when he needed to. But World War II was in no shape or form a war in the name of ‘Christ’. Are you indicating that all or the majority of Christians were in favour of Hitler? If you are then that statement is a bigger lie. Hitler actually despised Christians. His views were well documented. Hitler said ‘Christianity is an invention of sick brains: one could imagine nothing more senseless.’ (Hitler’s Table Talk 1941–1944, Oxford University Press, pp. 118, 119.)



And the Crusaders didn't have the weapons available to them that we have now. Given the size of the population in those respective centuries , I think you're being just a tad on the naive side.


Firstly, there were other wars apart from the Crusader Wars that weren’t religious in nature at the time. The Crusaders were mercenaries and large amounts of them did it for monetary gain although we can say it was started in the name of “Christ”. During the “Christian” era there was the weaponry to wipe out whole populations and civilisations and the Papacy amongst others made a valiant attempt to do so, but the atrocities of last century surpasses all that went before. The Gun was invented in 1250. The first hand gun was mentioned in 1326. The Machine-Gun was invented in 1718.


And the Iraq war? The Iran-Iraq war killed over a million people, dwarfing the U.S.-Iraq war.


The Iran-Iraq war had nothing to do with religion. The war began when Iraq invaded Iran on 22 September 1980 following a long history of border disputes. The origins of the Iran-Iraq war of 1980–1988 go back to the question of sovereignty over the resource-rich province of Khuzestan. The Iraqi regime's dissatisfaction over Iran's possession of oil-rich Khuzestan province had a direct result in its beginnings.

Have a read at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran-Iraq_War



Hitler was a madman, but "Christian" Germany either lined up as willing butchers, or looked on silently with nary a protest.


Why stop there (Christianity isn't soley a German thing)? You might as well have also said “Atheist” Germans or “Humanist” Germans or “Agnostic” Germans looked on in silence. There were Christians as well as atheists, etc who voiced their objections. Weren’t the allies mostly “Christian” countries that fought against Nazism? My point still remains it wasn’t a war started in the name of “Christ”.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 4 (view)
 
Case against Jesus’ existence dismissed
Posted: 2/10/2006 7:17:12 PM

but at least there'd be no more religious violence.


If we look at the major wars of the last century and this century we find:

World War I (a family affair).

World War II (world domination by a mad man).

The Iraq War (some would say started by 2 madmen).

All the rebellions and wars in Russia? (Fighting for Independence).

None of these would be classed as religious wars. These wars have killed more people than wars started in the name of Christ.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 1 (view)
 
Case against Jesus’ existence dismissed
Posted: 2/10/2006 6:37:12 PM
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11272557/

"Atheist claimed priest should stand trial for spreading a deceptive fable"

You would think that an atheist would have better things to do, like living his life happily as an atheist than attempting an unwinable case.

Ah well, I suppose hypothetically, if they get the law on their side there will surely be peace on earth?!

What do you think? Will there be peace on earth in a totally atheistic society?
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 3 (view)
 
Why do guys tell you they want you then move to a different state??
Posted: 2/9/2006 5:56:29 PM
Well you said “I would do anything for him”, so move state to?
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 134 (view)
 
WHY DO GUYS WITH AWESOME BEAUTIFUL WIFES CHEAT
Posted: 2/9/2006 5:54:26 PM

I have a great wife, she is a complete knock out, goes to church every Sunday. I also have a great business and am lucky enough to travel and afford some of the upgrades in life. I can't figure out why I cheat with other women and some are dogs compaired to my wife. I don't know if this is a carried over problem from my old Girlfriend that never put out or if I have a major problem and need Help. Looking for some feedback...thanks...


It’s because you’re a whore.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 49 (view)
 
men are from mars......
Posted: 2/9/2006 5:49:41 PM
Let’s face it; we men are our own enemies. A woman is peppered with men’s attentions from the get-go. From the very first moment a female looks like she is ready for our attention we pounce. A womans responses to men is moulded, to a large extent, by men’s actions.

Look at it this way, if you were at a dance class and women kept coming up to you for a dance. Would you really be bothered to ask a woman for a dance? They are asking you! So why should you bother.

I’ve know too many men who play the numbers game and they develop a tough skin, because they expect rejection. They know full well that out of 10 tries they will get more than 1 that are interested.

The guy who waits for the right “one” will not get anything (only by luck), because most women are trained (by men’s actions) to expect pro-active action.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 194 (view)
 
Reply To #1
Posted: 2/9/2006 5:31:24 PM
Most women like to talk about feelings and relationships; most men do not.
But men have plenty of ways of expressing them, if a woman knew where to look.

Affection, for instance, can be found in the meticulous way that a partner makes the bed every morning with an extra blanket spread across his partner’s side. Or in a mans' glances at his partner as she dozes in the passenger seat. Or in the pleasure that he takes in his partner's company as they tear the old wallpaper out of their home.

Talk is just talk; men act on their feelings. So women don’t talk the talk, just walk the walk. :)
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 158 (view)
 
Married but tempted
Posted: 2/9/2006 5:18:36 PM
If she's gonna do it, then she better get ready to pay the price of her infidelity.

Cheaters will ultimately be caught out.

She should ask herself

1. Is her husband worthy of her disrespect
2. Is she prepared to blatantly lie in her marriage
3. Would she tolerate living with her husband if she found out he had the same philosophy as her
4. blah, blah, blah……..

If she still wants to do it, tell her I know a RAT that would love to meet her.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 55 (view)
 
are women playing GOD when they become pregnant
Posted: 2/8/2006 7:49:23 PM
The male pill is the way to go in this permissive society (that's when it comes).
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 46 (view)
 
weird thing I noticed about teenage girls
Posted: 2/3/2006 6:11:30 PM
When adults write like that then you know something is fishy.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 7 (view)
 
Dating guys who are work-a-holics....can you trust them?
Posted: 2/3/2006 5:51:05 PM
It seems that you are putting conditions on him. The reason’s he gives aren’t implausible, because a dating site like this is practical for people with busy lives.

There are many marriages/relationships with people who live busy or anti-social lives. It boils down to whether you can acclimatise yourself to this life-style. Also, the frequency of phone calls isn’t necessarily an indicator of love. It’s how well placed his communication methods are. Does he leave you in a void or does he reassure you with short messages at the appropriate times.

My one advice is don’t fall in love too soon and stop questioning everything, it will only depress you when you are not with him. If he loves you then you will both manage your time together and come to a consensus (upper management hmmm.. maybe not - joke ).
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 150 (view)
 
can you love 2 people at once
Posted: 2/3/2006 5:35:19 PM
Sorry, but the strain of reading all 6 pages just put me off so I was just going on your original post and not your replies.

Well yep, if we are talking about numbers then theoretically you can love the whole world. I wonder what the world record is for how many people can practically, be loved at the same time? I suppose 7, i.e. 1 for each day of the week.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 148 (view)
 
can you love 2 people at once
Posted: 2/3/2006 5:20:43 PM
Hmmm... firstly, you are in love with 2 at once so you have already answered your own question.

You can also love others at the same time like your mother, father, brothers, sisters, etc although it’s a different kind of love.

The question is, are you having sex with the 2 you love?

If you are then the question is what are the consequences? I can only speak as if it was happening to me, but if I knew that there was another man that the lady loved, then I would be trying to prove to her that I loved her more and I was the right one for her. But if I knew she was sleeping with the other person then the motivation to prove my love would diminish.

The question is, if both said they were leaving which one would you rush to first?
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 20 (view)
 
True love defined
Posted: 2/3/2006 2:32:39 PM
True love unconditional love, (where Unconditional love is something that even dog can give.);


Hmmm… but dogs don’t give love (i.e a dog will do what it's trained to do or what comes natural to it), its the owner that gives love, so unconditional love can’t apply to a dog.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 58 (view)
 
I want to die
Posted: 2/3/2006 1:29:23 PM
The lows and highs are a part of life.

Pain is a protection mechanism. If I touch hot water the pain protects me by pulling my hand away. Don’t think of pain as a negative, when in truth it’s beneficial. When you see pain for what it really is you will recognise its there to protect you.

You are on a special journey now, so find your true self.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 88 (view)
 
Fake Pictures
Posted: 2/3/2006 1:08:21 PM
A website like this means that posters are free to post anything they want to as long as they stay within the forum rules.

You will need to register at a website that does constant checks to verify that the person is who they say they are.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 4 (view)
 
is something wrong with me?
Posted: 2/3/2006 11:31:04 AM
As long as you have a daughter with your ex, then there is a relationship. It’s a relationship built around your daughter.

I think, you will have to anticipate the consequences of the changed situation and it will be tough at times. If you tell her your personal details, it could be counter-productive. For example, if she is isolated from a social life it could lead to envy that you are happy and she is not. If you can be friends then be friends, but keep your life separate.

and "second_life" is right i.e. the relationship will last as long as your daughter is dependant on your ex.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 8 (view)
 
Dealing with Depression positively?
Posted: 2/3/2006 11:17:10 AM
Depression is a state of mind. Learn to harness your inner spirit and strenghten it.
Drugs, drink, smoking, etc doesn't get rid of the depressive mind, it only covers it.
The courage to change a life-style, environment, etc usually aids in recovery.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 13 (view)
 
True love defined
Posted: 2/3/2006 10:52:02 AM
Love is patient and kind; love is not jealous or boastful; it is not arrogant or rude. Love does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful; it does not rejoice at wrong, but rejoices in the right. Love bears all things; believes all things; hopes all things; endures all things.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 34 (view)
 
What are key qualities in a relationship?
Posted: 2/3/2006 10:28:44 AM
Well sticking through the good and the bad times.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 48 (view)
 
Non-Believers; why are they so insistant?
Posted: 1/30/2006 4:54:56 PM
^^^
I liked your circular statement until I noticed the final phrase

“modest bit of research and/or reading the scriptures in context”

Question: If it’s a positive belief or faith, i.e. Jesus was a good man, how do you rebuff this in scripture?
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 46 (view)
 
Non-Believers; why are they so insistant?
Posted: 1/30/2006 4:43:14 PM
For the believers, why do you think non-believers & athiests pursue these discussions on the board?


What I’ve realised on these boards is that every post that is a negative to one’s belief and faith can be rebuffed with a modest bit of research and/or, if you are a Christian, reading the scriptures in context.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 38 (view)
 
How do you get over someone famous.
Posted: 1/27/2006 7:08:09 PM
Skylarbry

I’m sure it must be tough seeing this person in your face all the time bringing back memories.

I’m sure there must be a get together group for individuals who share the same experiences as you. If not, why not start one up? A shared experience might help you get through it.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 28 (view)
 
Religious Numbers.
Posted: 1/27/2006 6:47:32 PM
Hope this helps:

New Testament Roman Emperors

1. Augustus (Imperator Caesar Divi Filius Augustus)

• born at Rome on September 23 63 B.C.
• died at Nola in Campania on August 19 14 A.D. at age 77 from an illness
• reigned 41 years, from 27 B.C. to 14 A.D.
• Augustus was the first Roman emperor, a grand-nephew of Julius Caesar. He reigned at the time of the birth of Jesus Christ (Luke 2:1).

2. Tiberius (Tiberius Caesar Augustus)
• born at Rome on November 16 42 B.C.
• died at Misenum on March 16 37 A.D. at age 79 from being smothered with a pillow while on his death bed from a terminal illness (he wasn't dying fast enough for his successor's liking)
• reigned 23 years, from 14 to 37 A.D.
• Tiberius was emperor at the time of the ministry and crucifixion of Jesus Christ (Luke 3:1)

3. Caligula (Gaius Caesar Augustus Germanicus)
• born at Antium (Anzio) on August 31 12 A.D.
• died at Rome on January 24 41 A.D. at age 19 from assassination
• reigned 4 years, from 37 to 41 A.D.

4. Claudius (Tiberius Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus)
• born at Lugdunum on August 1 10 B.C.
• died at Rome on October 13 54 A.D. at age 64 from eating deliberately poisoned mushrooms given to him by his wife Agrippina (Nero's mother).
• reigned 13 years, from 41 to 54 A.D.

5. Nero (Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus)
• born at Antium (Anzio) on December 15 37 A.D.
• died at Rome on June 9 68 A.D. at age 31 from suicide
• reigned 14 years, from 54 to 68 A.D.
• An insane tyrant, he set the Great Fire of Rome in 64 A.D. and persecuted Christians terribly. Paul, Peter, and many thousands of others were martyred during his reign.

6. Galba (Servius Galba Imperator Caesar Augustus)
• born near Tarracina on December 24 3 B.C.
• died at Rome on January 15 69 A.D. at age 72 from assassination during a rebellion among his rivals
• reigned 1 year, from 68 to 69 A.D.

7. Otho (Imperator Marcus Otho Caesar Augustus)
• born at Ferentium on April 28 32 A.D.
• died at Brixellum on April 16 69 A.D. at age 37 from suicide
• reigned less than a year, during 69 A.D.

8. Vitellius (Aulus Vitellius Germanicus Imperator Augustus)
• born on September 7 12 A.D. (birthplace uncertain)
• died at Rome on December 20 69 A.D. at age 57 from assassination during the Flavian Revolt, his body was dumped into the Tiber River
• reigned less than a year, during 69 A.D.

9. Vespasian (Imperator Caesar Vespasianus Augustus)
• born at Falacrinae on November 17 9 A.D.
• died in Rome on June 23 79 A.D.at age 70 of illness
• reigned 10 years, from 69 to 79 A.D.

10. Titus (Imperator Titus Caesar Vespasianus Augustus)
• born at Rome on December 30 39 A.D.
• died at Aquae Cutiliae on September 13 81 A.D. at age 42 of illness, possibly malaria
• reigned 2 years, from 79 to 81 A.D.
• Before becoming emperor, he was the commander of the Roman forces that conquered Jerusalem and destroyed the Second Temple in 70 A.D. precisely as prophesied by Jesus Christ 40 years before (Matthew 24:1-2).

11. Domitian (Imperator Caesar Domitianus Augustus)
• born at Rome on October 24 51 A.D.
• died at Rome on September 18 96 A.D. at age 45 from assassination by his own household staff
• reigned 15 years, from 81 to 96 A.D.
• During Domitian's reign John was exiled on the island of Patmos where he wrote the Book of Revelation (Revelation 1:9)
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 21 (view)
 
what does it take to not cheat
Posted: 1/27/2006 6:20:03 PM
Out of mind, out of thought.

To illustrate this point, try hard to avoid thinking of the word "frog" for the next 5 minutes. You'll find it harder now, but it would have been so easy had you not even tried.

So, If you think it you might end up doing it.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 26 (view)
 
Religious Numbers.
Posted: 1/27/2006 5:56:03 PM

Now, it just so happens that Nero Caesar has the Hebrew numeric value of,...you guessed it...666. So did Caligula


Do you have the calculation or reference to a website that gives the calculation for the number 666 for Nero or Caligua?

Also, It’s interesting to note that The Revelation of John was written during the reign of Domitian on the island of Patmos where John was exiled. So Nero and Caligua had already reigned and died before Revelation was written. Whereas John was prophesying in the current and future tense.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 61 (view)
 
Star Trek
Posted: 1/27/2006 3:57:36 PM
Star-Trek is cool. I even play Tri-Dimensional Chess, if I can find a partner to play with.

Hope that's not too nerdy.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 48 (view)
 
Can a Christian also be an Evolutionist?
Posted: 1/26/2006 6:23:16 PM

We are directly evolved from Proto-Humans, such as Australopithicus. Science can not tell us which Proto-Human species we are derived from, only which we are most likley derived from.


We are the only members of our genus, Homo, on the planet; and we are interfertile world-wide.

So are you saying that there must have been a number of proto-human species at one time, even though we are now alone? Why are they Proto-Humans? Couldn’t they have been fully human?

I remember the story of Ota Benga, a pygmy who was put on display in a zoo as an example of an evolutionarily inferior race a subhuman or Proto-Human.


Evolution is just like a famly tree, begining with one a single anticedant, and ending in hundrends of familys. And just like any family tree, it can only be traced back so far before the evidence for predecesors is not there.


Yes we are looking at humans within a family tree. Although I have looked back as far as I can, but I can’t find a bird or non-human in my family tree. I can only conclude that the bird (evidence for predecesors) was never there.


However, if the question you are asking is, DID a species like Lizards evolve into Birds, then that answer is yes. Birds evolved from Therapods, one of the Speices of Dinosouarids, which in turn evolved from Lizards. Lizards have evloved into Birds, but they could not do so again, even if they were to evlove into a species identicle to Birds they still would not be birds as they do not share the same ancestery.


This is where I have great difficulty in believing this. You say I did happen, yet all these creatures are extinct to be able to observe this happening. So it is inferred that it happened. But at the same time you say No it can’t happen today for us to observe this. Has evolution just stopped?
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 38 (view)
 
Can a Christian also be an Evolutionist?
Posted: 1/26/2006 2:46:53 PM
Msg 14


Well don't some claim we evolved through the apes?


Actually ....no, this is a "strawman" fallacy .


Msg 26

"Well don't some claim we evolved through the apes?"

This is a comic book perception of a complex theory. Evolution states nothing of the kind. We share a common ancestor with apes, we are not evolved directly from apes.



I’m very interested in the answer to this.

So the “Ape-Man” link is a myth and false?

Then what are we directly evolved from?
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 11 (view)
 
Repentance and Punishment
Posted: 1/25/2006 7:52:54 PM
With normal-minded people punishment is a self inflicting thing. For example, if I sleep with a man’s wife, or steal, ultimately I’m going to expect some kind of retribution.

Where punishment is irrational is when a person is mentally disturbed. They have no understanding of right from wrong so punishment is no deterrent. Dealing with their affliction and helping them recover is preferred.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 20 (view)
 
Religious Numbers.
Posted: 1/25/2006 7:38:44 PM
Well I’m taking it from what the scriptures indicate. I can come up with many personal interpretations but if it doesn’t agree with what is written I have to re-assess my interpretation.

Most people mistakenly take this number to represent the Devil or Satan, which is contrary to the relevant scriptures. As can be clearly seen in the scriptures, the number 666 is used to identify a man. Red Dragon, Old Serpent is used to indicate Satan in Revelation (Rev 12:9). The reading of Revelation indicates that the “man” who develops from the “beast” will be influenced by Satan (Rev 13:4)


Now it says that the number is calculated to a name and that name is the name of a man. Now Christ stated that no one will know the hour (or time) of his return, but we will know his coming is close and he gives the example of Noah’s generation. So it also seems that we will know his coming is near if we can identify the “man” and the actions of this man and the Noah like environment.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 18 (view)
 
Religious Numbers.
Posted: 1/25/2006 6:09:43 PM

The 666 is a time not a name. The antichrist will return to earth when the 6th seal ,6th vile, and 6th trump in Revelation have happened. Thats when Micheal boots satan out of heaven and he comes to earth claiming to be Christ. IMHO


Verse 17 clearly states the “number of his name”, so please provide a reference that states it’s a “time”?
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 3 (view)
 
Blaming the bad in your life on God.
Posted: 1/25/2006 6:00:06 PM
I always remember an incident when I gave a stranger money to get somewhere. Sometime later the same stranger saw me and came up to me and cursed me. Why? Because he said that I should have told him that where he was going to, the building was not going to be open (now how could I possibly know this?).

If you do good sometimes, you’re hated for reasons of ignorance on the other persons part.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 15 (view)
 
Religious Numbers.
Posted: 1/25/2006 5:47:29 PM
"REV 13:16-18
16 He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead,

17 so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name.

18 This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man's number. His number is 666."



The words that are synonymous with each other are “mark”, “name” and “number”.

The “number” of his “name” can be calculated, or the name can be derived into a number (in this case 666).
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 13 (view)
 
Religious Numbers.
Posted: 1/25/2006 5:28:29 PM
Well firstly, it clearly states that it is a name. A birth date is not a name.

Also, for example, the Hebrew letter and numbering system would be.

1 Aleph = 1
2 Beth = 2
3 Gimel = 3
4 Daleth = 4
5 He = 5
6 Vau = 6
7 Zayin = 7
8 Cheth = 8
9 Teth = 9
10 Yod = 10
11 Kaph = 20
12 Lamed = 30
13 Mem = 40
14 Nun = 50
15 Samech = 60
16 Ayin = 70
17 Pe = 80
18 Tsaddi = 90
19 Koph = 100
20 Resh = 200
21 Shin = 300
22 Tau = 400


And the Greek would be:

1 Alpha = 1
2 Beta = 2
3 Gamma = 3
4 Delta = 4
5 Epsilon = 5
Stigma = 6 *
6 Zeta = 7
7 Eta = 8
8 Theta = 9
9 Iota = 10
10 Kappa = 20
11 Lambda = 30
12 Mu = 40
13 Nu = 50
14 Xi = 60
15 Omicron = 70
16 Pi = 80
Koppa = 90 *
17 Rho = 100
18 Sigma = 200
19 Tau = 300
20 Upsilon = 400
21 Phi = 500
22 Chi = 600
23 Psi = 700
24 Omega = 800
Sampsi = 900 *

* Circa 6 BC, three letters, stigma (also known as digamma), koppa, and sampsi, were removed from the Greek alphabet, though they were retained for numerical use. Stigma was used for the number 6, as was koppa for 90 and sampsi for 900.


 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 11 (view)
 
Religious Numbers.
Posted: 1/25/2006 5:14:52 PM
Without trying to getting into the numbers game (deep breath)

The Hebrew and Greek languages, originally used to write the Bible, share a peculiarity: they have no separate symbols for numbers. Instead they substitute the letters of their alphabets for numbers. Therefore to represent a number 1 in Greek, the letter alpha is used, and for 2 the letter beta is used.

It can be seen that words, sentences and whole chapters also have numerical values, being simply the addition of the letters that comprise them.

Numbers can be seen as important and the most well known number is 666 which also represent words in the form of a name. The 666 doesn’t represent a birth date.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 21 (view)
 
What are your beliefs and what do they mean to you?
Posted: 1/25/2006 4:32:19 AM
Also, searching for the truth and uncovering things. For example, the statements were made above.



dinosaur was not coined until the 1930's


Greek to me........



While the word "dinosaur" does not appear in the Bible, there is a good reason for it. The King James Version (KJV) was translated in 1611, before the first fossils of dinosaurs were found in 1820 and before the invention of the word "dinosaur" meaning "terrible lizard" in 1841. Most modern translations of the Bible were written by people who believe that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago.

The scriptures says "Test everything"
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 57 (view)
 
A question for Christians
Posted: 1/22/2006 6:50:24 PM
^^^

That’s an interesting point. I can’t readily figure out in what way a new born baby sins. Sin comes from within. But since a baby has not been exposed to the world as yet it’s a difficult call to make.

I suppose a baby has no concept of God, so the baby is faithless. I’m only guessing here.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 17 (view)
 
The dreaded Ex problems
Posted: 1/22/2006 6:42:37 PM
Sounds like you want to go back with him and you’re trying to convince yourself that it is the right thing to do.

My personal opinion is that there is no such thing as a perfect relationship. There is always give and take in relationships that lasts.

If you believe he has the staying power and the ability to mature, grow, learn from his mistakes and you still love him. Then there is no harm in trying again.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 55 (view)
 
A question for Christians
Posted: 1/22/2006 6:25:44 PM
Firstly, all churches welcome everyone.

Secondly, all church members are sinners. Yes, believe it or not they all sin. A person doesn’t stop sinning when they accept God into their life. Their purpose is to sin less and less until they have the measure of their sin.

Thirdly, if you are going to look towards someone as an example, then look towards Christ. If you look towards any other you will be disillusioned, because they will be captive to sin and trying to get the measure of their sin.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 14 (view)
 
Is Chrisitianity a Dictatorship
Posted: 1/22/2006 6:10:26 PM
dic•ta•tor•ship

n.
1. The office or tenure of a dictator.
2. A state or government under dictatorial rule.
3. Absolute or despotic control or power.


Is Christianity a dictatorship?

A person has a free will to choose. You are free to not believe and sin. If you become a Christian you are under but two rules

1. Love God with all your heart

2. Love your neighbour


Christ is the only example to take and follow. If you look to others for your example you will fail miserable.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 11 (view)
 
Jesus dying for our sins
Posted: 1/22/2006 5:48:50 PM
The 10 Commandments are the best place to start if you want to consider whether Christ sinned.

See Exodus 20 and then the New Testament on Christ's life.
 service_with_a_smile
Joined: 4/12/2005
Msg: 62 (view)
 
Confused, Hurt, LOST......
Posted: 1/20/2006 8:09:21 PM
But why is it when someone treats you so horrible you still care for them?


because you need a lot of love in your life.


Lies CONSTANTLY... Yells, Cusses, Has hit me, Punch's things (including car windshields before)


Okay, if these things have happened, I’d say stay away from the kettle or you will get burnt. How old is your boyfriend? He should have better sense than abusing you.


WHY ON EARTH DO I CARE????

If he is the only boyfriend you have had, then maybe you have been conditioned to thinking this is some kind of returned-love. Take it from me, it’s not.


I wish I could understand this!!!!!! I've read things to relax my self..... Tried to go running, take a nice warm bath, chilled in the hot tub..... I can’t get this off my mind.... I feel like I cant prevail over it!


Keep chatting and asking questions. Meet new friends of your age. Go to dance classes, do karate or something to occupy your time and thoughts. The answer will come to you eventually.
 
Show ALL Forums