INBOX
|
HELP
|
ONLINE
|
SEARCH
|
MEET ME
| FORUMS |
CHEMISTRY
|
UPGRADE
|
SIGN IN
Show ALL Forums
Posted In Forum:
All Forums
Alabama
Alaska
Alberta
Arizona
Arkansas
Art/Music
Ask A Girl
Ask A Guy
Australia
British Columbia
Broken Hearts
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Dating & Love Advice
Dating Experiences
Dating Sites
Delaware
District Of Columbia
Event Hosts forum
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Health & Fitness
Humor
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Introductions
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Manitoba
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Brunswick
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
Newfoundland
News/Current Events
North Carolina
North Dakota
Nova Scotia
Off Topic
Ohio
Oklahoma
Ontario
Oregon
Over 30
Over 45
Pennsylvania
Plentyoffish Get Togethers
Plentyoffish Site/Suggestions/Help
Poems And Quotes
Politics
Prince Edward Island
Profile Reviews
Quebec
Recipes & Cooking
Relationships
Religion/Supernatural
Rhode Island
Saskatchewan
Science/Philosophy
Sex and Dating
Single Parents
South Carolina
South Dakota
Sports
Stories/creative writing
Technology and computers
Tennessee
Testimonials
Texas
Uk Forums
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Volunteer Moderators Only
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Home
login
MyForums
Author
Thread: light speed results baffle Cern
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
62 (
view
)
light speed results baffle Cern
Posted: 2/22/2012 3:32:19 PM
Looks like a simple connectivity error, and a rather humbling one at that:
"It appears that the faster-than-light neutrino results, announced last September by the OPERA collaboration in Italy, was due to a mistake after all. A bad connection between a GPS unit and a computer may be to blame.
Physicists had detected neutrinos travelling from the CERN laboratory in Geneva to the Gran Sasso laboratory near L'Aquila that appeared to make the trip in about 60 nanoseconds less than light speed. Many other physicists suspected that the result was due to some kind of error, given that it seems at odds with Einstein's special theory of relativity, which says nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. That theory has been vindicated by many experiments over the decades.
According to sources familiar with the experiment, the 60 nanoseconds discrepancy appears to come from a bad connection between a fiber optic cable that connects to the GPS receiver used to correct the timing of the neutrinos' flight and an electronic card in a computer. After tightening the connection and then measuring the time it takes data to travel the length of the fiber, researchers found that the data arrive 60 nanoseconds earlier than assumed. Since this time is subtracted from the overall time of flight, it appears to explain the early arrival of the neutrinos. New data, however, will be needed to confirm this hypothesis."
Cited here:
http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2012/02/breaking-news-error-undoes-faster.html?ref=hp#.T0U_N0pYVRc.twitter
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
164 (
view
)
foreign brides.. your thoughts
Posted: 2/20/2012 7:20:44 PM
^^L'il Freudian slip there........comparing foreign brides in the same paragraph as car wax and discount stereo equipment?
I'm not at all bothered by men looking to other countries for any "product" or "service," since we are using that particular meme. As long as there is no abuse or manipulation by either party, it's all good.
CheshireCatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
7 (
view
)
sleeping pills and vitality the next day
Posted: 2/8/2012 4:54:37 PM
OP, sleep aids such as Ambien bind to specific receptors in the brain that create a cessation in neural activity, which is how you transition into sleep. Ambien is more short lived and is supposed to prevent grogginess the next day. But studies have been done that found that Ambien increases non-REM sleep and decreases REM sleep.
Some types of memory functions require different types of sleep, and if you are shortchanged on REM sleep, even though you've slept well, it can be detrimental to how you feel the next day.
I think some studies were done with children that found that the wrong balance of REM/non-REM sleep resulted in ADD for some of them.
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
5 (
view
)
Analingus health issues?
Posted: 2/7/2012 10:27:19 PM
HPV is probably the biggest concern with analingus - which is transmitted between anus, vagina, cervix, and the mouth, in any order.
Of course HPV is associated with various warts, lesions, and cancers in all these regions of the body.
Barriers and condoms aren't terribly effective against HPV. You can often make contact with it merely by brushing up against someone's thighs (with your clothes off) or by kissing.
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
6 (
view
)
Has anyone had their lead fillings removed?
Posted: 2/7/2012 4:56:55 PM
And leave what in its place? Gaping holes? I only have two, and as previously mentioned, removing them temporarily raises mercury levels. In addition to that, the removal process can damage your teeth. Dentists who have been exposed to mercury in their offices should have been studied to determine what effects they experienced as a result of that exposure - I'm sure exposure levels were many times that of the average person with 3-4 fillings.
Far better to just have your teeth pulled outright if mercury is that much of a concern. Because there have also been some concerns raised raised about the endocrine disrupting effects of plastic chemicals used in composite resins.
Lead has a half-life (the time required to eliminate half of it from your body) which is longer than most of us will live. It's a natural isotope and we're constantly exposed to it in small amounts in the environment, so unless we've actually been clinically poisoned (in which case, get help from a doctor), there is no point in trying to "detox" from it.
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
95 (
view
)
Defunding Planned Parenthood-A Painful Betrayal
Posted: 2/7/2012 2:54:01 PM
There is no link between abortion and breast cancer. Please don't attempt to obtain your epidemiology from Alex Jones, Jeff Rense or David Icke. Breast cancer is not a disease attributed to the Illuminati.
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/gpr/09/3/gpr090308.html
Even the National Cancer Institute has concluded that there is no link:
"In 2003, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) convened more than 100 of the world’s leading experts on the topic of abortion and breast cancer. After a lengthy and exhaustive review of all of the research, including a number of newer studies that avoided the flaws of their predecessors, they concluded that “induced abortion is not associated with an increase in breast cancer risk,” noting that the evidence for such a conclusion met NCI’s highest standard. In 2004, an expert panel convened by the British government came to the same conclusion."
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
57 (
view
)
Defunding Planned Parenthood-A Painful Betrayal
Posted: 2/4/2012 10:01:40 PM
I was wondering how long it would take before Muslims were brought up in this thread........
It seems inevitable doesn't it? If someone started a thread on choosing the best "party-ponies" for a kids B-Day, *someone* will inevitably show up to interject Muslims into the convo.
More on topic, PP will only gain as a result of this "backpedalling for the cure" by Komen. Bloomberg has already pledged $250,000 of his own money, and PP will ride this internet wave of indignation to millions in donations.
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
572 (
view
)
Never married & no kids
Posted: 1/26/2012 8:13:24 PM
^^Did you consider that maybe she wasn't interested in being his wife?
Is it a unilateral decision to "make someone their wife?"
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
639 (
view
)
Women with multiple cats - sign of mental illness?
Posted: 1/13/2012 3:55:00 PM
^^That's great! Don't apologize to anyone for what you do for animals!
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
121 (
view
)
Asperger's Syndrome
Posted: 1/7/2012 1:36:15 PM
Saying ALL would exposed would develope a similar mutation couldn't be more inaccurate.
If you (or jachamer) are referring to my statements, you'd best review what I wrote because I never stated anything of the sort.
It's really not possible to explain why single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) or copy number variations (CNV) predict the occurrence or severity of ASD to someone who reads all the wrong literature and refuses or is incapable of comprehending the heritability of autism.
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
625 (
view
)
Women with multiple cats - sign of mental illness?
Posted: 1/2/2012 4:28:06 PM
Ha - pet hair is a condiment in my house. Dog, cat, horse, it's all good!
Folks, don't leave your animals outside........unless of course you also live outside, then it's OK to share your cardboard box.
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
617 (
view
)
Women with multiple cats - sign of mental illness?
Posted: 1/1/2012 10:34:29 PM
^^What a nice thing to do in memory of this man! You're to be commended for taking the initiative and caring for these forgotten animals. I hope 2012 is filled with more people who have made it their resolution to be kinder, more compassionate, and more loving to animals.
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
44 (
view
)
Putting tattoos in description
Posted: 12/29/2011 10:26:40 PM
I'd like to reiterate what many above have said - for small tats I wouldn't bother disclosing it in your profile, you can always mention it after. I wouldn't want to meet someone who was going to wimp out over a small discreet tat.
I have four tats, none of which are visible to the casual observer. have a large tat running down one side from breast to thigh (go big or go home) and in the past I'd mention it while chatting on the phone before meeting anyone. I also have a tat on my wrist in white ink, which no one really notices unless they look for it.
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
116 (
view
)
Asperger's Syndrome
Posted: 12/27/2011 3:56:27 PM
^^Those who can't refute the facts resort to making ad hominems, Kemo Sabe.......
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
114 (
view
)
Asperger's Syndrome
Posted: 12/25/2011 9:43:17 PM
Williams Syndrome IS heritable. Heritability is a feature of populations, not individuals. So even if something is heritable -- it is not true that it is inherited by all the individuals in the population. Nothing in your links suggests that autism is correlated with vaccines - the vaccine hypothesis is lacking convincing scientific evidence. Much of our DNA is merely a technical artifact, a low frequency accidental transcription in the genome. Most mutations that occur are corrected, but some still get past the goalie, hence, we have evolution such as immunity to HIV - http://www.livescience.com/9983-immune-hiv.html
Even Wakefield wasn't able to replicate his study, and he was given plenty of opportunity to do so. If you're looking for credible research on autism spectrum disorders, please refer to the following sources:
http://www.asatonline.org/intervention/treatments_desc.htm - Association for Science in Autism Treatment
http://www.autismsciencefoundation.org/ - Autism Science Foundation
https://simonsfoundation.org/ - Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative
http://www.nlmfoundation.org/grants.aspx - Nancy Lurie Marks Family Foundation
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
246 (
view
)
Atheism.
Posted: 12/14/2011 6:49:52 PM
``Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life...``
If you really believe that death leads to eternal bliss, why are you wearing a seat belt?
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
2935 (
view
)
Evolution.
Posted: 12/14/2011 12:24:08 PM
``But there are still no facts proving connection of all living things from one single life form to what we have today.``
Of course there are - all complex multicellular life forms evolved as a result of the eukaryotic revolution.
CheshireCatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
54 (
view
)
Are You Getting the Flu Shot This Year?
Posted: 12/13/2011 8:55:06 PM
You`re drinking colostrum? I mean, I`d have to assume that, since everything else you`ve written isn`t typically something you`d administer to a newborn.
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
13 (
view
)
Aging?
Posted: 12/10/2011 6:10:03 AM
Telomeres have critical functions in stem cells, aging, and cancer. As I recall, one of the discoverers of telomeres and telomerase was fired by the Bush administration because she was critical of their policy on stem cells.
The latest research that's taking place is with senescent cells. Researchers have found that the presence of senescent cells in tissues contributes to aging in the tissues in which they are found. The Mayo clinic researched the elimination of senescent cells in mice, and the results were very interesting. The mice showed improvement in many aging-related disorders such as arthritis, cataracts and muscle wasting. The mice also didn't experience tissue-thinning which makes us look older facially.
Clearance of p16Ink4a-positive senescent cells delays ageing-associated disorders
Advanced age is the main risk factor for most chronic diseases and functional deficits in humans, but the fundamental mechanisms that drive ageing remain largely unknown, impeding the development of interventions that might delay or prevent age-related disorders and maximize healthy lifespan. Cellular senescence, which halts the proliferation of damaged or dysfunctional cells, is an important mechanism to constrain the malignant progression of tumour cells1, 2. Senescent cells accumulate in various tissues and organs with ageing3 and have been hypothesized to disrupt tissue structure and function because of the components they secrete4, 5. However, whether senescent cells are causally implicated in age-related dysfunction and whether their removal is beneficial has remained unknown.
To address these fundamental questions, we made use of a biomarker for senescence, p16Ink4a, to design a novel transgene, INK-ATTAC, for inducible elimination of p16Ink4a-positive senescent cells upon administration of a drug. Here we show that in the BubR1 progeroid mouse background, INK-ATTAC removes p16Ink4a-positive senescent cells upon drug treatment. In tissues—such as adipose tissue, skeletal muscle and eye—in which p16Ink4a contributes to the acquisition of age-related pathologies, life-long removal of p16Ink4a-expressing cells delayed onset of these phenotypes.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v479/n7372/full/nature10600.html
Cheers.........
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
45 (
view
)
Do you have a Car question
Posted: 12/4/2011 7:49:12 AM
The Driving distance from BC to Florida?
I'd be really surprised if anybody could make that trip in two days, unless you don't plan to sleep for those two days.
I moved from Ontario to BC and if I were to drive back, I'd expect to take a week at least, and it's not even as long a distance as Florida ---> BC.
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
589 (
view
)
Women with multiple cats - sign of mental illness?
Posted: 12/2/2011 4:38:44 PM
^^The parents are animal hoarders, and your former girlfriend was well on her way.
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
26 (
view
)
Burzynski...Curing Cancer in Spite of Ill Will?
Posted: 11/28/2011 3:27:23 PM
Some follow-up on Burzynski:
It appears he has hired a lawyer (although he won`t confirm this) who has taken issue with bloggers:
``You and your supporters can stop asking if I am an attorney. Again, I represent the Burzynski Clinic, Burzynski Research Institute, and Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski. If your articles remain online I will pursue you in court to the highest extent of the law.
Threats to your family? You mentioned to me that you just had a child. I advised you to spend more time with your child instead of lying to the public. I also advised that you will be affected financially once a lawsuit is filed against you. Why would you be so selfish and inconsiderate to your family to go through the stressful and financial burden of multiple court proceedings knowing that you are posting lies and propaganda?``
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2011/11/you_dont_tug_on_supermans_cape.php
Since this ``representative`` of Burzynski has started to threaten bloggers, it is all starting to sound like the whole Scientology crackdown on freedom of speech.
I guess Mr. Stephens has never heard of the Streisand Effect.
CheshireCatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
2 (
view
)
Intimate Encounter Filter - paid account and EULA
Posted: 11/25/2011 5:30:41 PM
I would agree with you that it should be laid out in the EULA for paying customers.
I don`t agree with you that it should be disabled automatically as a result of being absent in that agreement.
The users who have the filter up don`t care about your paid agreement with PoF - therefore, they should not be obliged to accept incoming mail from people who have reached the IE threshold merely because it wasn`t made entirely clear to a 3rd party.
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
66 (
view
)
The End of Cancer. DCA makes its world debut.
Posted: 11/9/2011 3:00:39 PM
::facepalm::
Facts and logic have no place here do they?
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
13 (
view
)
What Is An Intimate Encounter? (Definition)
Posted: 11/8/2011 7:45:57 PM
^^Wow, I'm trying not to be unsympathetic to your predicament, but you've been here one day? How did you manage to find 4 intimate encounters profiles in rapid succession in one day? I thought you actually had to search for them specifically?
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
141 (
view
)
Bachmann..... For President 12.... Will She get your Vote?
Posted: 11/8/2011 7:36:50 PM
^^Millions of jobs you say? I didn't know there was such a market for jobs in the ex-gay ministry.
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
64 (
view
)
The End of Cancer. DCA makes its world debut.
Posted: 11/8/2011 7:27:18 PM
^^It also doesn't say that he didn't vape it or eat it either, does it? You assumed, based on one article alone, that smoking was the only way he ever used pot? Maybe he also made marijuana butter? Are you sure?
Furthermore, he's hardly the only activist that has ever succumbed to cancer, and all of those activists would certainly have known of Rick Simpson et al's claims, and all of them would have had access to the highest quality cannabis oil.
Excessive claims, and excessive gullibility do no one any good.
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
61 (
view
)
The End of Cancer. DCA makes its world debut.
Posted: 11/8/2011 6:46:09 PM
^^ Why don't you read what was written? Do you know that this activist did not in fact also eat marijiana? I mean, if it cures everything from dandruff to shin splints, how could he fall ill in the first place?
This is what marijuana smokers tell everyone - smoking it CURES!!
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
59 (
view
)
The End of Cancer. DCA makes its world debut.
Posted: 11/8/2011 6:29:10 PM
Smoking it and ingesting are two different things.
You'd think a marijuana activist with cancer would know what do to with it. Ben Masel had lung cancer, and smoked marijuana heavily, but for some reason decided to have radiation. Not enough confidence in marijuana to cure him?
http://host.madison.com/news/local/article_68fbe4a4-7385-11e0-b755-001cc4c002e0.html
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
53 (
view
)
The End of Cancer. DCA makes its world debut.
Posted: 11/8/2011 3:49:52 PM
^^If hemp oil could cure cancer outright, none of the marijuana advocates who had cancer would have succumbed to their disease. In fact, if we believed everything about cannabinoids, CB1/CB2 receptors, etc, no one who used marijuana would ever develop cancer, which isn't the case.
There's no magic bullet. Sorry.
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
25 (
view
)
Burzynski...Curing Cancer in Spite of Ill Will?
Posted: 11/8/2011 3:44:13 PM
^^The fraud I'm referring to is the one annotated on his Wikipedia page. Unless that page is incorrect?
"Burzynski was also found guilty of fraud in 1994, as he claimed reimbursement from a health insurer for an illegally administered cancer treatment."
What difference does it make? No insurance would pay for it so it says more about his integrity if he only treated patients he thought he had a chance to cure...NOT?
Some insurance companies WILL pay for experimental treatments like Burzynski's IF the patient has already sought out conventional treatment which has failed. I'm pretty sure that AETNA was brought up as an example of such a company in the video. How a researcher selects his patients can make a lot of difference. If you select patients who are "less ill," (understanding that with glioma patients, they are all seriously ill, but some are "less terminal" than others), you can make your remission rates look better because these patients may still be alive by the time your study is complete.
I'm not claiming he did this,
but this has certainly been done, mostly notably with drug trials. If you think of a few prominent drugs that have been recalled in the last 10 years or so, you'll get the idea.
The problem with the claim that he may have cured 10% of cancer patients is difficult to ascertain, because as I mentioned, there is a natural remission rate with many cancers. The real evidence that you have a therapy occurs when you are able to treat patients OVER AND ABOVE the remission rate and/or they live longer than the median survival period and /or have a higher progression-free survival rate. How many patients with stage IV solid tumours went into remission? Etc. etc. This does seem to have occurred with his patients, but no one can really consider it a "slam dunk" until he could reproduce those same results with a phase III trial. So why no phase III trials? What's the impediment?
You state that Burzynski didn't conduct trials for his entire career. Fair enough. For how long did he conduct trials then?
Wasn't Dr. Samid granted a patent in spite of Burzynski's existing patent? What was the outcome, do you know? Drug (and other companies) buy patents all the time, according to their market value. If a patent-holder and purchaser can agree on a price, the fact that there is an existing patent is not an impediment.
It was the FDA's refusal to grand the trials.
I'm not sure if we're referring to the same trials? The FDA DID supervise at least one clinical study as per the video. I can't recall if this was the study where the therapy was "dilued," or not. And as I mentioned, the FDA granted Burzynski orphan drug status, which conferred additional patent-holder rights on antineoplastons.
To sum up, I've not declared Burzynski a fraud, far from it. The argument I've made is that the antineoplaston therapy could be properly assessed as a therapy if it progressed to phase III. Promising therapies collide with FDA rules all the time.
If this is a great therapy, then this is certainly the worst example of the FDA's philosophy of "control and delay." But you understand that being unconvinced is not the same thing as calling the guy a fraud, right?
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
23 (
view
)
Burzynski...Curing Cancer in Spite of Ill Will?
Posted: 11/7/2011 7:00:14 PM
This was an interesting video that raised more questions than can be answered about Burzynski, who seems to be reporting a 30-50% remission rate with antineoplastons – spontaneous remission is about 20% and 10 year survival rate is about 2% with other conventional treatments of this particular disease.
There does seem to be some success with his phase 2 trials of the antineopastons here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16484713
And a few Japanese researchers seem to have found some success with antineoplastins (although they don’t seem to be replicating his results):
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16012735
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12768372
As the video mentioned, the NCI funded his therapy for phase II trials, which derailed after some patients experienced side effects (which probably explains why they had “diluted” the antineoplastons therapy, as explained in the video). The video does mention that antineoplastons are “non-toxic” if I recall, but this isn’t entirely correct - http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/antineoplastons/patient/page2
From the above report:
Antineoplaston side effects included mild, short-term side effects as well as serious nervous system problems. Most cancer patients would probably be willing to risk these side-effects, since in many cases they are less harmful than some of the conventional therapies:
The following mild side effects have been noted:
• Anemia (lower than normal number of red blood cells).
• High blood pressure.
• Dizziness.
• Gas.
• Fever and chills.
• Feeling very tired.
• Headaches.
• Abnormal levels of calcium in the blood.
• Dry or itchy skin rash.
• Nausea and vomiting.
• Numbness.
• Irregular heartbeat.
• Swelling caused by excess fluid in body tissues.
• Swelling, pain, or stiffness in small joints.
Serious nervous system side effects included the following:
• Extreme sleepiness.
• Confusion.
• Seizures.
• Swelling near the brain.
If Burzynski is still posting these results (30-50% remission) then it appears that he would have a therapy IF he weren’t cherry-picking patients or otherwise somehow massaging his success rate. On the other hand, if Burzynski IS a quack, why would the FDA grant orphan drug status when one considers that the FDA has a very unfavourable relationship with him? Why would Dr. Samid allegedly attempt to steal his patent on antineoplastons? Why was his fraud conviction apparently not overturned?
As for the standard Big Pharma conspiracy, a few moment’s consideration shows that this is not logical - not for any potential cancer "cure." At any given time, there are perhaps 12 million Americans living with various cancers. That’s an enormous market. If there was a “cure for cancer” it would possibly be worth close to a billion per year globally. What pharmaceutical company wouldn’t be interested in bringing that therapy that to market? Even paying off Burzynski to buy his patent rights would be worth it at those figures. Covering up real cancer cures would require that many thousands of people stay quiet and ignore the death of many people, including possibly themselves.
Burzynski has been running clinical trials for decades, which in itself is unusual. A phase II trial should run anywhere from 2 – 8 years maximum – not 30-40 years as Burnzynski has been doing. If you’re running trials for 30-40 years and haven’t progressed to a phase III trial, something isn’t right - in fact, it’s a bit suspicious. Perhaps running the trials is his way of administering antineoplastons legally, since he can’t do so otherwise, and of course he is charging quite a bit of money for the treatments. After all this time, why wouldn’t Big Pharma be willing to invest the $300 million fee if there was evidence that they worked? As I mentioned, the market for a successful treatment is IMMENSE.
Not everything adds up here, but it's also not clear that he might be a fraud either.
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
2 (
view
)
Intimate Encounter Filter/Meet Me Matches
Posted: 11/2/2011 12:13:02 AM
This system does indeed prevent those with 4 or more first-contact message to Intimate Encounters profiles from messaging those with the filter. Forever. This subject has been done to death and there is no sign of it being changed up, perhaps because many women using that particular filter want it to stay the way it is.
The "Meet Me" function doesn't override the individual profile filters and it's not supposed to. People click "yes" without reading the profiles and without knowledge of the filters on that profile. Perhaps if they did read the profile info, they wouldn't always be so willing give others the impression that they want to meet.
CheshireCatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
19 (
view
)
72 day marriage
Posted: 11/1/2011 10:53:26 PM
No, Lebron is only ranked about 15th. Last I read Kobe makes $25 million per year.
Where does Kris rank? It's quite likely that Kris isn't even in the top 100 when you consider that Richard Hamilton (ranked 30th) makes $12 million +.
Edit for above:
Yeah, you changed your post to swap LeBron for Kobe when you realized Lebron wasn't top of the heap.
Odam doesn't even make it into the top 25 players of yearly salaries list, which makes his 11 million dollar a year salary look avg.
He isn't making $11 million. He's making $14 million as of 2011. But compared to Kris H he's #WINNING by any standard.
CheshireCatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
17 (
view
)
72 day marriage
Posted: 11/1/2011 10:43:13 PM
That's news to me...... Unless you consider 16,900,233 total for his career not that much money.. lol
You forgot to compare that to Lamar Odom's take, which was my point. Makes Kris look like he's on welfare by comparison.
http://content.usatoday.com/sportsdata/basketball/nba/salaries/player/Lamar-Odom
National Basketball Association Salaries
NBA Player Salaries - Lamar Odom
SEASON TEAM SALARY POSITION
2009 Los Angeles Lakers $ 14,148,596 Forward
2008 Los Angeles Lakers $ 14,148,596 Forward
2007 Los Angeles Lakers $ 13,248,596 Forward
2006 Los Angeles Lakers $ 12,348,596 Forward
2005 Los Angeles Lakers $ 11,470,000 Forward
2005 Los Angeles Lakers $ 11,470,000 Forward
2004 Los Angeles Lakers $ 10,548,600 Forward
2003 Miami Heat $ 9,960,000 Forward
2002 Los Angeles Clippers $ 3,557,585 Forward
2001 Los Angeles Clippers $ 2,812,320 Forward
CheshireCatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
13 (
view
)
72 day marriage
Posted: 11/1/2011 8:47:15 PM
Kim made about $18,000,000 on her wedding and files for divorce 72 days later (but gays wreck the sanctity of marriage).
I've read that Kris Humphries doesn't make that much money (for a pro-basketballer) - Lamar Odom makes more than twice what Kris gets. And Kris sure doesn't make any money while locked-out. He didn't even pay for the $2 million dollar ring.
I think she's laughing all the way to the bank. So is pimp mama Kris. Her relationships are bankable - she can get married every year and she can't lose.
The Kardashian Klan have all have turned some alliterative spelling and a total lack of personal dignity into a multi-million dollar industry.
CheshireCatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
8 (
view
)
HepC
Posted: 10/30/2011 10:15:49 AM
Sexual transmission of Hep C isn't terribly common, but both the CDC and Health Canada consider Hep C to be an STD/STI.
It used to be that Hep C was primarily transmitted by blood and needle contamination. Since surveillance techniques have improved with the use of PCR technology, the primary vectors for contamination in North America are now intravenous drug use.
http://www.cdc.gov/std/
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
926 (
view
)
would you marry for money?
Posted: 10/29/2011 7:17:50 PM
^^ I like your philosophy!
CheshireCatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
14 (
view
)
Scott Olsen?
Posted: 10/29/2011 1:36:54 PM
My previous comments questioning the ability of the police to hit someone directly and deliberately were mostly rhetorical. After the most recent G20 debacle in Toronto it became apparent that the cops were overwhelmed and unprepared (or maybe just incompetent) with the protesters - standing right beside people who smashed windows, looted stores, burned vehicles, while simultaneously beating other protesters. If they're going to arrest anybody, why wouldn't it have been the ones doing most of the damage (Black Bloc)?
I was also shocked (apparently, I'm easily shocked) when the cops in Quebec decided to shoot two cows that escaped a transport truck heading to the slaughterhouse - the cows limped around while the cops shot them IN THE LEGS. WTF? Sirens and flashing lights for "aggressive" farm animals. I'm surprised they didn't just give the cows a $5000 fine for "looking English" and having Ontario license plates.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/story/2011/10/27/ott-gatineau-police-shoot-cows.html
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
23 (
view
)
vigulante punishments
Posted: 10/28/2011 9:07:13 PM
Drives fail.
Send your data to Iron Mountain. That way, no matter where you are, you know exactly where it is. Breaking kneecaps becomes completely unnecessary.
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
27 (
view
)
The End of Cancer. DCA makes its world debut.
Posted: 10/28/2011 7:51:12 PM
You sound like a tobbacco company executive....you really do.
If you've had prolonged exposure to asbestos, and you have mesothelioma, then it's a foregone conclusion that the exposure is the proximate cause. Mesothelioma is a very specific type of cancer with a precise cause.
But what if some of those coal mine workers also smoked and drank heavily. How could you determine which environmental factor was the most significant contributing cause?
Are you going to automatically claim that everywoman in Japan who dies of breast cancer next next year was the result of radiation from the Fukushima nuclear plant failure? What if they were on HRT and developed cancer? Did the HRT cause the cancer or did the radiation (or some other unknown variable)?
My dad died of lymphoma of the pancreas. He wasn't living in the Chernobyl area nor did he live in Japan when the bombs were dropped. He didn't work in a coal mine either. Nor did he smoke or drink.
So would you care to diagnose it for me?
Your logic is faulty.
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
24 (
view
)
The End of Cancer. DCA makes its world debut.
Posted: 10/28/2011 4:42:13 PM
it can take as little as 30 minutes most times to find the envioremental factors creating the cancer....
It's difficult to impossible to determine the cause of most cancers because exposure to cancer-causing agents may have occurred many years before diagnosis. Cancer is the result of a combination of agents and risk factors.
If you've eaten a poor diet without physical activity, taken certain drugs or hormones, worked in a job where you're exposed to radiation, viruses, bacteria, and environmental chemicals, how can you pinpoint the precise cause of your cancer? In most cases you can't because most disease is idiopathic (without known cause).
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
2909 (
view
)
Evolution.
Posted: 10/28/2011 1:35:39 PM
All paleontologists know that the fossil record contains precious little in the way of intermediate forms; transitions between major groups are characteristically abrupt
Technically, all fossils are transitional fossils. But if you're looking for examples of fossils that share characteristics of two taxonomic groups, you can find them here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transitional_fossils
If you like watching YouTube while listening to Grand Funk Railroad, you might prefer this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUcB_HiCKnM
Cheers
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
5 (
view
)
Scott Olsen?
Posted: 10/28/2011 7:44:16 AM
I saw an Oakland video where police fired teargas on a group of people who came to the aid of someone in a wheelchair. How is that necessary?
I have not seen the video of Olsen being hit, although I saw pictures of him afterwards. I'm really holding out hope that it was an accident, otherwise how on earth could anyone do this? I'm really shocked......
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
16 (
view
)
The End of Cancer. DCA makes its world debut.
Posted: 10/28/2011 6:57:51 AM
Incidentally, cancer only afflicts animals that are domesticated,
Sorry, this is not correct. I'll give you one very obvious example.
Ever heard of the myth of the Jackalope? Rabbits with antlers? They're infected with Shope Papilloma virus, which causes carcinomas to grow on their heads similar to antlers.
Animals in the wild may not live long enough to develop cancer, because they might have been predated by other carnivorous animals. There are many other examples. Cancer is a cellular and molecular disease, not a disease of domestication.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shope_papilloma_virus
I've already addressed the issues of "potential cures being squashed and banned" in another thread, so I'm not going to repeat myself here. You can check my posting history if you want to read about the investment by drug companies into new cancer therapies.
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
24 (
view
)
First date in a bar/nightclub..Thoughts??
Posted: 10/27/2011 10:37:16 PM
I almost always had first dates in bars. If it wasn't in a bar or pub it was in an upscale coffee shop downtown.
I never had any trouble hearing anyone except on the nights when we arrived and found out there was a live band, which was not part of the plan.
CheshireCatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
60 (
view
)
healing with macrobiotics
Posted: 10/27/2011 3:43:15 PM
Guys, if you wanted to address the posts and not the posters, wouldn't you refrain from giving them a personal analysis that supposedly highlights exactly what is wrong with them on a physical level?
CheshireCatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
20 (
view
)
Burzynski...Curing Cancer in Spite of Ill Will?
Posted: 10/27/2011 3:34:55 PM
^^Why do you want to bring the Nazis into this discussion?
Personally, I don't buy the "medical conspiracy" against cannabis (which isn't the subject matter of the documentary either). Although the prohibitionist philosophy of the US does stimie the beneficial uses of cannabis because conservative governments don't want it. We've decriminalized up here, over and done with, already.
There is no single cure for cancer because it consists of many different diseases. If I'm going to watch the video, perhaps some people can read the attached article on why we haven't exactly won the "war on cancer," despite it being officially announced more than 40 years ago.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/13/health/research/13genome.html
A Decade Later, Genetic Map Yields Few New Cures
Ten years after President Bill Clinton announced that the first draft of the human genome was complete, medicine has yet to see any large part of the promised benefits.
For biologists, the genome has yielded one insightful surprise after another. But the primary goal of the $3 billion Human Genome Project — to ferret out the genetic roots of common diseases like cancer and Alzheimer’s and then generate treatments — remains largely elusive. Indeed, after 10 years of effort, geneticists are almost back to square one in knowing where to look for the roots of common disease.
One sign of the genome’s limited use for medicine so far was a recent test of genetic predictions for heart disease. A medical team led by Nina P. Paynter of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston collected 101 genetic variants that had been statistically linked to heart disease in various genome-scanning studies. But the variants turned out to have no value in forecasting disease among 19,000 women who had been followed for 12 years.
The old-fashioned method of taking a family history was a better guide, Dr. Paynter reported this February in The Journal of the American Medical Association.
In announcing on June 26, 2000, that the first draft of the human genome had been achieved, Mr. Clinton said it would “revolutionize the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of most, if not all, human diseases.”
At a news conference, Francis Collins, then the director of the genome agency at the National Institutes of Health, said that genetic diagnosis of diseases would be accomplished in 10 years and that treatments would start to roll out perhaps five years after that.
“Over the longer term, perhaps in another 15 or 20 years,” he added, “you will see a complete transformation in therapeutic medicine.”
The pharmaceutical industry has spent billions of dollars to reap genomic secrets and is starting to bring several genome-guided drugs to market. While drug companies continue to pour huge amounts of money into genome research, it has become clear that the genetics of most diseases are more complex than anticipated and that it will take many more years before new treatments may be able to transform medicine.
“Genomics is a way to do science, not medicine,” said Harold Varmus, president of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York, who in July will become the director of the National Cancer Institute.
The last decade has brought a flood of discoveries of disease-causing mutations in the human genome. But with most diseases, the findings have explained only a small part of the risk of getting the disease. And many of the genetic variants linked to diseases, some scientists have begun to fear, could be statistical illusions..............
The article continues for another page and a half.
CheshireCatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
17 (
view
)
Burzynski...Curing Cancer in Spite of Ill Will?
Posted: 10/27/2011 11:46:54 AM
@Revilors, thanks for responding via PM.
Here's the Youtube URL for anyone who wishes to watch:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0ibsoqjPac
The video time is 1hour: 48 minutes approximately, so this is going to require a bigger time commitment than I originally thought. Man, it better be worthwhile!
cheshirecatalyst
Joined:
9/14/2007
Msg:
16 (
view
)
Burzynski...Curing Cancer in Spite of Ill Will?
Posted: 10/27/2011 10:48:25 AM
@Revilors, does this documentary appear anywhere else on the web?
I don't have Netflix, and thought I could find it elsewhere.......
Show ALL Forums