online dating service
REGISTER | MAIL/PROFILE | HELP | NOW ONLINE | SEARCH | RATING | FORUMS | SUCCESS STORIES

 

     
Posted In Forum:
Home   login   MyForums  
Show ALL Forums  
 
 Author Thread: men and emotional maturity
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 57 (view)
 
men and emotional maturity
Posted: 11/21/2009 1:31:50 PM

This is nuts...I wanted get married at 20 so I could get on with my life with someone. It was always the women that couldn't commit.

That's because it has to be their idea, not yours.

In other words, they're not really looking for "commitment" so much as for surrender.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 38 (view)
 
cheating, how prevalent is it?
Posted: 11/21/2009 1:18:06 PM
^^^^ I think "thankful" is more like it.

Otherwise he'd be asking where he could buy a chastity belt.

Feminist Evelyn Reed wrote about this...

A woman did not need a husband as a means of support; she was herself economically independent as a producing member of the community. This gave women the freedom to follow their personal inclinations in sex relations.

Of course she was writing about the matriarchal Stone Age tens of thousands of years ago where sexual law-and-order was yet to be discovered!
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 15 (view)
 
On professionals and commitment (interesting one)
Posted: 11/21/2009 10:53:30 AM

Why do you believe those professional people committ to marrige in that large proportion?

I'm not sure it's really that much larger a proportion, but people climbing the social ladder often think getting/being married gives them more respectability in the eyes of others. That is, they think they're taken more seriously if they're viewed as having "settled down".

I've also known one woman (single) who worked almost exclusively around married men in a professional environment; she wanted to get married for largely professional reasons, namely she was viewed as a threat by all the men's wives because she was around those men all day when their wives couldn't be there to guard them. Getting married was her way of becoming "safe" in that environement, and of fitting in with the rest in the job routine.

And, yes, she did get married (but not to yours truly). I'd also note she wore a wedding ring while single, for the oft-stated reason of its function as man repellant.

People get married for all sorts of reasons, so I don't think there's a single answer to the OP's questionable supposition.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 1284 (view)
 
are women playing GOD when they become pregnant
Posted: 11/21/2009 10:28:31 AM


Please quit irresponsibly and inaccurately repeating this.

Vasectomies should NOT be viewed as being reversible, but as permanent.

It is both difficult and expensive to try and reverse one, and even with all the wonders of modern medicine they turn out to be reversible only 50% of the time.


Bullshit fallacy.

...http://www.vasectomymedical.com/vasectomy-reversal-success-rates.html


Right, you're into believing some promo website trying to hype and sell vasectomies and reversals?

My sources are impartial, namely the U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Services, the U.S. Public Health Service, the Nat'l Institutes of Health, the Mayo Clinic, etc.

In fact I'm pretty much quoting what they say. I.e.:

The chief advantage of vasectomy -- its permanence -- is also its chief disadvantage. The procedure itself is simple, but reversing it is difficult, expensive, and often unsuccessful. Researchers are studying new methods of blocking the vas that may produce less tissue damage and scarring and might thus permit more successful reversal. But these methods are all experimental, and their effectiveness has not yet been confirmed. It is possible to store semen in a sperm bank to preserve the possibility of producing a pregnancy at some future date. However, doing this is costly, and the sperm in stored semen do not always remain viable (able to cause pregnancy). For all of these reasons, doctors advise that vasectomy be undertaken only by men who are prepared to accept the fact that they will no longer be able to father a child. The decision should be considered along with other contraceptive options and discussed with a professional counselor.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 1267 (view)
 
are women playing GOD when they become pregnant
Posted: 11/21/2009 9:10:08 AM

It's reversible.

Please quit irresponsibly and inaccurately repeating this.

Vasectomies should NOT be viewed as being reversible, but as permanent.

It is both difficult and expensive to try and reverse one, and even with all the wonders of modern medicine they turn out to be reversible only 50% of the time.



That's why they are not doing it en mass.

Again, you need to get your facts straight. Approximately half a million vasectomies are performed in the United States each year, and have been going back at least about twenty years. By comparison, there have been about two million boys born each year for the last several decades, so this is about a quarter of the male population getting vasectomies.

Half a million per year works out to one every fifteen seconds during the working day, which is a pretty steady stream.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 8 (view)
 
Internet daters: are we damaging our social skills?
Posted: 11/21/2009 9:07:47 AM

... are we damaging our social skills?

Seems like you're presuming we had some of those to begin with.

I thought we were all here in the first place because we didn't, and we're hoping someone else will.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 1261 (view)
 
are women playing GOD when they become pregnant
Posted: 11/21/2009 8:59:17 AM

...Of course the consequences [of pregnancy] are greater to mothers than fathers

I will contest this common assertion of the Maternal Mystique.

If "consequences" can be reliably measured by monetary costs, I can get a surrogate mother and an invitro fertilized egg for ~$40K.

Eighteen years of child support at $500/month totals up to $108K.

So it's arguable that the consequences of a pregnancy are appreciably greater for fathers than for mothers.

Which is why the involuntary nature of fatherhood that we're discussing is such a big deal for some (for those who don't quite get it yet), just as women would have a big deal about involuntary motherhood if it existed.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 64 (view)
 
Men and self esteem
Posted: 11/20/2009 2:58:15 PM
^^^^ Wow, you really are off in some fairy land if you think it's is about "men LETTING the women have custody of the kids ". What's he supposed to do -- just take possession from mom and trigger a nationwide Amber Alert?
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 18 (view)
 
men and emotional maturity
Posted: 11/20/2009 2:47:13 PM

...keep it nice and slow, that will weed out or help the hampsters grow up a tad.

For a man, "I'm not interested in marriage/commitment" is the equivalent of a woman saying "I'm not interested in having sex".

So what you're proposing is a mexican standoff involving hamsters.

Him holding out from commitment is just his way of weeding out or helping the hamsters "grow up a tad".

Oh, and of course, no offense was intended towards any mexicans...
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 58 (view)
 
Men and self esteem
Posted: 11/20/2009 2:37:45 PM
^^^^ Wrong! The government doesn't interfer to prevent mom from messing with dad's legally court-ordered visitation rights. But there'll be hell to pay if he doesn't get the child support check in on time.

Report: 20% of Divorced Parents (read: moms) Want to Make Other Parent’s Contact with Child ‘as Unpleasant as Possible’ - "...more than one-third of children lose all contact with their fathers after divorce": http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=4392
(P.S. - be sure to read the comments, too)

So your admonition should be to the moms: Mothers...allow your ex's to spend more time with his boys.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 6 (view)
 
Is the pollution debate centering around carbon dioxide as a bait and switch?
Posted: 11/20/2009 12:36:42 PM

Basically, is the pollution debate centering around carbon dioxide as a bait and switch to ignore real toxic chemicals?

Concern about the two is not mutually exclusive. One can be concerned about both, say, PBA's and CO2.


Carbon dioxide is about as toxic as water, meaning its not toxic.

Depends on what you mean by "toxic"... I'm sure many more people die each year by drowning than die from CO2 suffocation, but I wouldn't use that fact to argue water is more "toxic" than CO2. The latter affects the entire biosphere in possibly adverse ways, and since we're at the tippy top of the foodchain it's potentially very toxic in an indirect sort of way.


Shouldn't negating toxic chemicals be the primary concern when it comes to reducing pollution, while negating carbon dioxide emissions being a secondary concern?

Neither has to be universally primary or secondary. Since multi-tasking is something societies are fully capable of, we can give attention to both.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 5 (view)
 
Does class matter in online dating?
Posted: 11/20/2009 10:46:15 AM

rich middle-class men?

Isn't that an oxymoron?

I thought the idea behind the Sugar Daddy + Model type sites was to hook up over-priced "escorts" with guys posing as having the money to afford them.

IOW, I really don't see what class has to do with it. In theory, if the sites were what they appear to be (but likely aren't), her beauty power would match his success power, so in that sense they're equal and of the same class dating-wise.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 21 (view)
 
Men and self esteem
Posted: 11/20/2009 9:47:21 AM

Seriously (and with respect), that cross you're carrying sounds awfully heavy...

Thanks for illustrating in knee-jerk, textbook fashion how important facts (to men, at least) always fail to make it onto the radar screen, how the subject always gets changed when they're brought up in an attempt to make them go away.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 46 (view)
 
Wants to know about past realationship
Posted: 11/20/2009 9:39:10 AM

If I were considering a relationship with someone, I'd want to know something about their previous relationship. Specially if that relationship was with a convicted criminal.

Isn't this precisely the sort of thing women are always talking about when they mention wanting to get to know someone?

Or are they just talking about trivial stuff like what their favorite color is?
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 14 (view)
 
Men and self esteem
Posted: 11/20/2009 9:25:15 AM

So in closing let me ask one more time what about the guys?

We're a feminacentric society, obsessed to the point of neurosis about the well-being of women.

Men don't matter. They're expendable, and so no one hardly much cares if they have self-esteem issues. They can die sooner, suffer more on-the-job deaths, more violent crime, and more suicide, but it doesn't hardly register on the societal radar screen -- unless maybe it affects some woman and/or her kids.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 9 (view)
 
men and emotional maturity
Posted: 11/20/2009 9:20:30 AM
Wow, Barry is really over the hill and has totally run out of ideas if he's trying to recycle and get yet more mileage from those tired old sexist cliches of twenty years ago about commitment-phobic men who won't do what some woman wants one of them to do, and of pathetic single guys who really just need a mom around to change the TV to the right channel and put their dip in the right container. Sheesh, that's really lame stuff.

Maybe if he got out more he'd evolve his understanding to a level higher than the intellectual maturity of a hamster on this.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 1052 (view)
 
are women playing GOD when they become pregnant
Posted: 11/19/2009 10:04:15 PM

Oh but wait, let me guess, you probably want the hooker to pay YOU....right?

Sure, why not?

My little swimmers are the best. AND they just might entitle her to ~$100,000 (or more!) in payments over 18+ years, so she should look at her paying me as a sort of investment that could pay off really big, like buying a lottery ticket.

No, really, I need the money to buy insurance to protect me against her getting pregnant.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 953 (view)
 
are women playing GOD when they become pregnant
Posted: 11/19/2009 11:55:35 AM

It is so easy now for men to get that little clip ... and have it reversed when you are ready for children

"only about half of vasectomy reversals are successful." - The Mayo Clinic's website


Back in the dark ages, people used to argue against birth control (abortion being unthinkable then) on the grounds that women who wanted to have sex but didn't want children to result should just get sterilized. IOW, they thought all sex should be restricted to being only procreational. Lots of women are, and society in general is, still in the dark ages so far as men are concerned in this regard.

VVVVV - In Africa there are tribes which don't have a word for "father". After getting around the midunderstanding which results from trying to get at a word which doesn't exist in their thinking, they'll laugh and say something like "men don't have children, only women do!" as if it was the most obvious thing in the world, because, of course, in matriarchies the children belong to the mother, and, since there is no concept of "father" men have no responsibilities towards "their" children, because, of course they aren't "his" children.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 33 (view)
 
Extra Terrestrial Life
Posted: 11/19/2009 11:07:36 AM
Belief in the existence of ET's is pretty much just the modern day equivalent of a belief in angels.

Hundreds of years ago there was an entire science of angelology. Scholars had worked out why angels had to exist, what their characteristics must be, how many could dance on the head of a pin, etc, etc. All respectable people agreed angels existed and could discuss all sorts of things about them as if they actually did exist.

For the last couple of hundred years, and especially in the last hundred or so, it's become fashionable instead to believe in ET's.

They may or may not actually exist. Right now, and ignoring conspiracy theories about Area 51 and the like, there's no solid evidence that they do. Maybe someday there will be such evidence.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 32 (view)
 
Whats the difference?
Posted: 11/19/2009 8:48:27 AM

...I ultimately want a l0ng term relationship but the reason I changed it was because people I met wanted to go entirely too fast emotionally as well as physically.
No matter what people on this site seem to want something official immediately. They'll try to mark their territory, talk about deleting their profile, even trying to kiss on the 1st date which happens every time... yada yada yada

Just change your sex to "Male" and all your problems will instantly go away.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 926 (view)
 
are women playing GOD when they become pregnant
Posted: 11/19/2009 8:06:55 AM
^^^^ I think you're neglecting the fact that one of the rationales for the continued legality and availability of abortions for women is because birth control doesn't always work, and therefore a fallback option is necessary.

But you do remind me of a story told by some groupie bopping one of the bigname and presumably very wealthy rap stars, who all the while was thinking to herself "Gee, I hope the condom breaks...". Sortofa new twist on lieing back thinking of England.

There's also another consideration, namely what if it's the woman who doesn't want to use a condom? I know local lore has it that it's always the man who callously resists using a condom while it's the woman who wants it, but many women will resent a man who, after several epidodes of sexual intimacy, still wants to use one, and will try to talk him out of doing so.

Presumably by that point he's convinced that she's not diseased, and she might play the "but, don't you trust me?" card. In other words, for at least some women, the use of a condom is appropriate for casual/stranger sex, but not for incipient relationship sex. So it can be the woman who is insisting on unprotected sex.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 834 (view)
 
are women playing GOD when they become pregnant
Posted: 11/18/2009 1:05:55 PM
Just about all women now are to men's reproductive rights what the far religious right is to women's reproductive rights: women don't want men to have any reproductive rights; the religious right doesn't want women to have any reproductive rights.


A consent to sex by a man, is no more an agreement to make a baby, than consent by a woman to have sex, is an agreement to make a baby.

It's a sign of how desperate women are that they want a man's willingness to have sex with them into something which effectively constitutes an implied agreement not only to make a baby, but to pay for it as well.

Formerly, a man expressed his willingness to support a woman and their children by agreeing to marry her, not by his willingness to merely have sex with her. But since marriage is no longer very attractive to men, women have resorted to now turning sex into a potential "Gotchya!" in order to hook a man.

It's not really working, but at least women have nothing else left to fall back on as a Plan C.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 13 (view)
 
older men and younger women best chance for successful marriage?
Posted: 11/18/2009 11:51:19 AM
^^^^ I thought they were conflating "smarter than him" with "having more education", though they really didn't go into it in any detail.

The article mostly seemed like a way to ride the buzz of some celebrity show-biz marriage.

I doubt that 1,000 people is enough to sample all the various possible ages, age differences, educational differences, previous divorces, etc. to draw the sorts of conclusions about all these factors that it sounds like they're trying to make.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 808 (view)
 
are women playing GOD when they become pregnant
Posted: 11/18/2009 9:01:41 AM

Instead of asking women to carry the full burden of responsibility of the decisions that THEY ultimately make with THEIR bodies, it's tell the men to keep it in their pants.

Which is stangely reminiscent of what unmarried women who turned up pregnant fifty years ago were told, namely that she should have kept her legs together.

It was neanderthal thinking then, and still is today.


Bottom line, if men are afraid that sex is gonna saddle them with a financial responsibility for a child, then they can either do without sex, submit themselves to a sterilization procedure, or have sex in some way that there is no risk of pregnancy...

Bottom line, all sex for men -- even first date sex, or drunken-bar-pick-up-sex -- should be regarded as if it were reproductive (or procreational) sex.

Only women are privileged to freely partake of recreational sex.

Back in the dark ages when all this was the other way around, women rightly complained mightily. Why should men not now react the same way?
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 35 (view)
 
Why do men seem distant?
Posted: 11/18/2009 8:48:51 AM

It's confusing, any ideas on what makes a man pull away!

He didn't "pull away". He merely shot his wad by telling you how he felt about you and is therefore done.

Either that or he's taking a page from the female playbook and is thinking playing hard to get will work, and that a woman would recognize this play and not be confused by it.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 43 (view)
 
just to gather opinions,would you date a guy who said this?
Posted: 11/18/2009 6:00:00 AM

WHY are you asking this?

If you read the OP's profile some ideas would come immediately to mind... She's having difficulty getting the guys she likes to willingly sign on to her no-sex-until-I-feel-like-it program, and is trying to figure out how to keep from losing out to the competition.

Maybe the guy in question is just blowing smoke, but it's not inconceivable that he actually is highly desirable -- not just to her, but to other women also -- and thus has other options available to him, and so he doesn't necessarily see the point in sticking around indefinitely waiting for her to warm up to him while she's playing hard to get.

If this view is correct, she's essentially trying to get the competition to reveal itself with her question. Maybe this is designed to gauge whether the guy is just blowing smoke and might be back.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 773 (view)
 
are women playing GOD when they become pregnant
Posted: 11/17/2009 6:53:42 PM

I managed to turn out a bit differently than most guys

Even if you do say so yourself.

From here you look like just another dumbsh1t with a stupid grin in a stupid baseball cap.


I try to educate other guys, but most don't want to learn.

Condescend much?

Funny you bring up Sanger... because she felt felt that in order for women to have a more “equal footing” in society and to have physically and mentally healthy lives, they needed to be able to decide when a pregnancy would be most convenient for themselves. That was about a hundred years ago.

Now it's men's turn to want a more “equal footing” in society rather than be slaves to women, by being able to decide "when a pregnancy would be most convenient for themselves."

Something she wrote was most prescient:

It is a vicious cycle; ignorance breeds poverty and poverty breeds ignorance. There is only one cure for both, and that is to stop breeding these things. Stop bringing to birth children whose inheritance cannot be one of health or intelligence. Stop bringing into the world children whose parents cannot provide for them. Herein lies the key of civilization. (emphasis mine)

She seems to be suggesting the pregnant poor should be made to have abortions?
Anyone on board with that?

Recall that in LA County, 60% of the so-called deadbeat dads earn less than $15k per year.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 768 (view)
 
are women playing GOD when they become pregnant
Posted: 11/17/2009 5:42:08 PM

If I am buying dvd, clothes, etc it is with MY money.

That's right up there with now-bankrupt General Motors saying they're not paying their executives bonuses with the taxpayer bailout money they got, they're using that other money over there which is separate from the bailout money.

The point is that even though it's euphemistically called child support, it isn't given to the child, but to mom (or, in rare cases, dad). If it was really child support, it would follow the child when it was put up for adoption, or put in foster care, but that doesn't happen. And it would also be required of formal sperm donors, since they know what they're donations are going to be used for. But that doesn't happen either.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 2 (view)
 
DNA Based Dating
Posted: 11/15/2009 12:39:48 PM
I think you're crazy. Opinions?
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 292 (view)
 
Why some men never want marry?
Posted: 11/14/2009 7:44:14 AM

But that’s just it, Verity; men do marry. And the ones most likely to wed are the ones that theoretically have the most to lose. I’ve demonstrated that in my previous posts. Take professionals, physicians, attorneys, etc. beyond a certain age you’d be hard pressed to find many single ones. ... I travel in these circles of professionals and most of the men are married; a great number of them to stay at home wives, not necessarily with young children at home.


Uhm, the research suggests your "observation" is inaccurate, though the study which I turned up came at it from the other direction -- i.e., it was looking at the "economically disadvantaged", rather than the better off professional class. So you may have to flip these findings around.

People with economic disadvantages are just as likely to marry as other people, but their marriages are substantially more unstable.

Through their early 30s, economically disadvantaged adults actually are more likely to marry than advantaged adults.

By age 35, other statistics show that the fractions ever married are virtually the same across education groups.

Characterizing the situation as one of “not as much marriage” among disadvantaged people misses an important distinction. Tying the knot does not seem to be an issue: rather, the problem appears to be maintaining the union thereafter.

Source: http://www.mdrc.org/publications/393/workpaper.html

So, if more in the professional class are currently married, this suggests their income, which we presume to be higher, acts as a stabilizing factor in their marriages though it's not exactly a foregone conclusion that this was why they're married in the first place. The greater stability of the affluently marred is maybe not something many would want to acknowledge, since the pro-marriage factions could use it to argue for married men being paid even more over singles than they already are, which obviously goes against egalitarian ideas. Or the anti-marriage factions could use it to argue women are just gold diggers after all.

But the guy's money obviously doesn't always act as "marriage glue", as that same money can act as an incentive for the woman to divorce the guy, since the laws assure her she'll still get her "fair" share of his money. There are plenty of divorced professionals, though I'll leave it to others to turn up the study which addresses them specifically.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 415 (view)
 
are women playing GOD when they become pregnant
Posted: 11/14/2009 7:01:15 AM

A woman who gives birth to a child and who walks away = ABANDONS her child is not only as vilified, she is normally MORE vilified than the millions of men who walk away en masse everyday. That is not a lie, it's a FACT.

What women? Really, I have no idea what you're talking about.

We've heard plenty about "deadbeat dads", but there's no equivalent term for all those supposedly vilified abandoning moms you're claiming exist. What is it?

In many states women who abandon their newborns are not vilified by accomodated. For example, to prevent them, when they have a change of heart about having given birth, from leaving them in a dumpster, they can now drop them off at any fire or police station -- no questions asked.

It's not like their names are collected and their pictures posted on milk cartons and pizza boxes, as is done for non-custodial parents in arrears, in sortofa 10-most-wanted sort of publin manhunt, which is the practice in some states.

So I just don't see the "she is normally MORE vilified" claim playing out in the least, and can't understand why you're portraying women who give up their newborn to adoption are somehow heavily victimized, because I don't think they are.

If anything, I'd say not enough women are choosing to "abandon" their newborns in spite of the fact that it is single motherhood which is highly vilified in some circles. For many men who become accidentally pregnant, the child ending up in someone else's custody other than the mom's would relieve them of child support obligations and might be preferable (seeing as how selfish men are), so it's not like they're going to be part of your hypothetical vilifying community.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 19 (view)
 
why do men assume you want to talk sex ?
Posted: 11/14/2009 6:42:31 AM

...you wander if there are any nice genuine guys out there

Then you need to wander on out of this pond and over to PlentyOfEunuchs.com.


I worked with a man that had a sex harrassment suit filed against him. Puzzled he made an appointment to talk with the HR officer. The complaint read, "I overheard Mr.... tell a female co-worker that he had to have it in the morning, he even woke up thinking about it. I found his comments disgusting & it made me feel uncomfortable."

His reply coffee, we were talking about coffee!!

Hence the button I have which I wear to breakfast: Coffee SLUT!!

It's so the waitresses know I need a lot of it real badly in the morning.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 350 (view)
 
Love,Quality of life and who pays
Posted: 11/11/2009 3:29:02 PM

Just curious....but was there a corresponding study done using women's picture and salaries?

Not that I've seen. Maybe it's an oversight, maybe there's a reason. Maybe the thinking is "men are simple" and so the researchers think they already know what men want, namely a pretty face and a nice figure.


but could you address also the fact that many men reject women who "have conformed to what men want from them" for earning too much... thus labeling us "too independent" for a relationship?

Not sure exactly what you mean by "women who "have conformed to what men want from them" for earning too much"... wasn't all this business about women becoming CEO's and Presidents, and earning lots of money, feminist's idea, not men's? Maybe I'm missing what you're getting at.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 271 (view)
 
are women playing GOD when they become pregnant
Posted: 11/11/2009 12:50:49 PM

Newman v. Newman, 653 P.2d 728 (Colo. Sup. Ct. 1982) and Osborne v. Osborne, 428 N.E. 2d 810 (Mass. 1981) are part of a growing trend to allow couples to stabilize their obligations.

I have no idea what you're trying to get at here.

When I look up Newman v. Newman, I find:

"Accordingly, the trial court determined that the wife had made a threshold showing of need entitling her to maintenance and, although the antenuptial agreement contained a waiver of any claim to maintenance, awarded her the sum of $ 500 per month for a period of four years. "

In other words, they over-rode the pre-nup and gave her "maintenance". And she got a Cadillac too! But I'm not a lawyer, so maybe I'm reading that gibberish wrong. Just like no one knows what you mean when you say "stabilize their obligations".

I can say I found nothing in there that had anything to do with kids, custody, or child support. This was my concern with what you initially alluded to. One cannot decide those matters in advance via a pre-nup and it would be wrong to give anyone the impression they might be able to.

Needless to say, I didn't bother with Osborne v. Osborne.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 176 (view)
 
Psycho Girls--- who's had one
Posted: 11/11/2009 12:01:48 PM

It is easier/less time consuming to ask "who hasn't had one?"

That's what I was gonna say.

But then I realized all the crazy chicks we have is one of America's best kept secret, public awareness on this issue is abysmally low, and so maybe people chiming in isn't such a bad thing after all.


She probably just likes you a lot and you arent used to it.

I'm unaware of any guy successfully using the "he probably just likes you a lot and she isn't used to it" defense in a sex harassment or stalking case.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 266 (view)
 
are women playing GOD when they become pregnant
Posted: 11/11/2009 10:44:34 AM
^^^^ You can't do those sorts of things (like making sure a child has "a mother and father figure") with a pre-nup since state law always over-rides such one-one parent "contacts", and they're beside the point so far as the thread topic is concerned as marriage really isn't being talked about.

What one needs is maybe a pre-sex agreement. If as a man you want to ensure you are free from the threat a woman potentially presents, you can't have sex with a woman without a lawyer present these days, basically. No exaggeration.


As for the subject. No sense weighing in on this one... nothing is going to change

Especially women's inability to connect the dots regarding their total monopoly of reproductive rights and the fact that they can't seem to find a decent date.

Actually, it's not "dots" but "dot".
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 20 (view)
 
Is it just me, or has the world gone mad?
Posted: 11/10/2009 1:29:36 PM
^^^^ Let's put it the way Angela Fiori did and leave it at that:

Feminism proclaimed that for women to be fulfilled they had to adopt the career ambitions of workaholic men, the sexual promiscuity of a Kennedy, and the cynicism of Gloria Steinem (the pre-married one, that is).

 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 33 (view)
 
someone please try and help me understand...
Posted: 11/10/2009 1:20:21 PM
Yea, go crying to Big Brother and Uncle Sugar to get him to compensate you for your self-inflicted damage.

Or learn the rule that you cut your deal going in, not way after the fact, lest it look like an attempt at extortion.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 179 (view)
 
how come women initiate the breakup 80% of the time?
Posted: 11/10/2009 12:19:25 PM
Wife up for Adoption

Wife up for adoption to a good home. 2 for 1 deal as she is the size of two women.

Skills include watching TV, eating, wasting money, complaining, yelling at myself and the kids, and cheating on me while I am at work.

She is also excellent at pointing out faults and shortcomings but this feature comes with a bonus! According to her she has no faults of her own so this makes her perfect.

Dislikes are work of any kind, having sex within the marriage, anything that requires effort, intelligence, compassion, or understanding. She is truly a modern woman!

Check out one of her personal ads and you are in like Flint, it doesn't matter if you have a job as she will just use some of the money out of our family budget to pay for your date.

Feel free to take her home and keep her, as it will save me the cost of a divorce lawyer.

- seen on Craig's List
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 249 (view)
 
Why some men never want marry?
Posted: 11/10/2009 11:54:03 AM

Some statistics show divorced men are eight times more likely than divorced women to commit suicide.

This says much more about the involuntary ass-reaming men so frequently get in divorce than it does about "the nature of men alone".


And men without wives are twice as likely to suffer depression and heart attacks.

Somehow I don't think we'll be seeing a men's health initiative which involves drafting women and making them be some guy's wife.


Yeah guys, you do fare better financially... (repeated twice so we wouldn't miss it)

It always comes back to and ends up being about the money with some women...
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 325 (view)
 
Love,Quality of life and who pays
Posted: 11/10/2009 11:13:34 AM
^^^^ I know the answer, but I'm not giving it away for free! You'll have to buy the book to find out.


at least the women who want the man to treat are honest ... the men will NEVER say they prefer to date a woman with more money, more successful job than they have.

That's because they know there's no point in being honest in this fashion, since women will never (opps, I mean NEVER) go for dating a guy with less money, less successful job, etc.

So, nice try, but you really can't blame men for conforming to what women want.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 321 (view)
 
Love,Quality of life and who pays
Posted: 11/10/2009 10:13:06 AM

I saw an informal study...

That didn't sound very informal. But anyway, there have been similar studies where instead of pairing a guy with a salary they presented guys for rating with and without various markers of social status -- for example, a guy wearing a garbage collector's uniform versus a business suit. Same results.


So my advice to men...

You're mistakenly presuming women's biological programming changes as a result of conscious desires or lack of same. I'm skeptical on this working the way you propose. If anything, the women you recommend to men are even pickier and have narrower filters as a result of their experience (they say as much all the time here in forums), though admittedly not all their conditions and concerns revolve around money.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 316 (view)
 
Love,Quality of life and who pays
Posted: 11/10/2009 9:12:16 AM

how that part is changing, and now a man ISN'T just his earning potential (to most women), and can actually pick and choose his own wife--or even choose NEVER to marry?

No choice is involved. Since marriage is the institution which most oppresses women (according to feminists), if a guy marries he's by definition an abuser, by making her work a "second" shift, by ignoring her, by not ignoring her, etc, etc.

And if he choses not to get married, he's hurting some woman (or women indirectly) by skirting his responsibilities, by being a commitment-phobe who refuses to grow up, by being intimidated by smart, successful, independent yada yada yada women, etc, etc.

So, like I said, no choice is involved. Either way he's just no good -- except as someone for feminists to blame for everything.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 241 (view)
 
Why some men never want marry?
Posted: 11/10/2009 8:32:53 AM

These are interesting articles written BY men acknowledging its a pr0blem:

The NY Times is the most feminized major paper in the country, so I'd hardly expect them to run an article with the following in it:

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ 2004 Time Use Survey [BLS], men spend one and a half times as many hours working [on the job] as women do, and full-time employed men still work significantly more hours than full-time employed women. When work outside the home and inside the home are both properly considered, it is clear that men do at least as much as women. A 2002 University of Michigan Institute for Social Research survey found that women do 11 more hours of housework a week than men but men work 14 hours a week more than women. According to the BLS, men’s total time at leisure, sleeping, doing personal care activities, or socializing is a statistically meaningless 1% higher than women’s. The Families and Work Institute in New York City found that fathers now provide three-fourths as much child care as mothers do —- 50% more than 30 years ago.
- http://www.glennsacks.com/are_american_husbands.htm

I'm actually tired of having to look that up and post it here, over and over and over again, but the myth of the slacker husband just won't die.

What's never addressed is why, if husbands are such slackers, so many women seem to want one so much?


men these days are FOOKIN' lazy as hell... in sheer hours worked, they work a LOT less than their fathers and grandfathers did. Men also partake in much more leisure activities than women.... both in time and monetarily.

This is another of those no-win binds so many men are faced with by lots of women: if a guy works too much, you're a workaholic who's neglecting his wife and kids, and/or not spending enough time traveling and doing all the exciting things she wants to do; if you don't work enough, you're a good-for-nuthin' lazyazzed bum. One suspects TuffLuv isn't all that atypical in having a very narrow Goldilocks zone in wanting the perfect (for her) workhorse. Perhaps men's reluctance towards marriage might have something to do with our now viewing ourselves as merely existing to be some woman's personal workhorse?


IE: Blue Collar jobs for the most part, that a married man is preferred OVER a single man.

Yes, a guy with the burden of a wife and kids is more compliant and makes a better workhorse for his employer, too. This is a so-called privilege of marriage, and of married men in particular, which is really designed to benefit women and children.

In fact, the gap in wages between married men and singles of either sex is the real wage gap -- it's some 50% to 70% -- but it has sparked hardly a political protest. Few even seem to be aware of it.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 93 (view)
 
Men 35-44, are we in the sweet spot?
Posted: 11/10/2009 7:25:33 AM

if the men were so spectacular, why aren't they taken?

Ha! The type of question only a woman could ask...

Being "taken" and being "spectacular" are mutally exclusive characteristics for men these days.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 19 (view)
 
Whats it like being single over 30?
Posted: 11/10/2009 7:14:23 AM

I had to talk for almost an hour, the question was " whats it like being single?"

So are you saying they don't use Rorschach inkblot tests anymore?

My question back at them would be "compared to what?".

It's a dumb question, like asking "what's it like being you", or "what's it like being X?" (X = "male", "a white person", "155 lbs", etc.), so I think I would have just stared back at them blankly since I'd have no idea what the question means or is supposed to elicit. IOW, I'd be a difficult test subject for them.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 220 (view)
 
Why some men never want marry?
Posted: 11/9/2009 3:37:41 PM

Indeed, but you should not think women or feminist all fall into the same camp and share the same beliefs.

What, are you saying some pee standing up?

Yes, there are over a hundred different flavors of feminism (leaving just plain regular women out of it for the moment) but that doesn't mean there aren't lots of important common traits, irregardless of the attempt to fuzzify things by always giving any individual feminist the opportunity to say "but I don't believe that" in a sort of bad cop/good cop gambit.

The phrase "we take the woman's side in everything" might fairly sum feminism up quickly and simply so far as how it functions in practice. That's why you can have feminists one day railing against men and "patriarchal" marriage, but then the next day railing against a guy who doesn't want to get married when some woman does. No logical consistency is ever required, because the first thing feminism did was outlaw thinking.


There are feminists who knew not to throw out the baby with the bathwater. That recognize there are some institutions that can be REFORMED without being altogether discarded. Marriage is one of those.

It's gone beyond "reformed". Marriage has been largely destroyed by the ease of unilateral divorce and its consequences (especially to men). Somebody from about half a dozen generations back wouldn't recognize what we today call "marriage" as being marriage, the change has been that drastic. People still use the same word, but they aren't talking about the same thing.

The change has been so profound that that's why lots of people now refer to it as "just a piece of paper", which IME is actually being very charitable. As rock_hunter correctly alluded to above rhetorically, marriage confers no rights on the husband and obligates the woman in no way. It's all a one-way deal, with things flowing from the man to the woman -- even after the marriage has ended. Would any sane woman really want a guy who was so dumb and had so little self-respect and self-regard as to agree to that arrangement?

The destruction of the "institution" is what feminists openly set out to do because they thought the "patriarchal family" was evil. In reality though, women were, next to children, the main bene?ciaries of patriarchal marriage, which is why men invented it in the first place, as well as why women are in so many instances worse off now that the institution has been weakened to the point where it's acceptable even to gays and lesbians.

What the women who previously would have benefited from marriage but are no longer able to do so don't seem to realize is that their enemy is not men, as the feminists would have them believe, but those who purport to speak on behalf of all women, namely the feminists themselves.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 9 (view)
 
Do you ever think about how much time you have left?
Posted: 11/9/2009 2:28:28 PM

My main point to this thread is to make guy's (well everyone over 40) AWARE that we don't really have a ton of time to get this thing right.

Oh geez, so because you feel time is running out for you and your chances, because your bio-clock is ticking loudly, he has to get with your program? I can't imagine why he's not more enthusiastic about signing on to the script such a narcissist has all laid out for him.

You're a woman past forty... start getting desperate and start settling for what little you can get (and being thankful for it). Or start working on your cat collection.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 14 (view)
 
When is it acceptable to tell a girl how you feel?
Posted: 11/9/2009 12:24:32 PM

So when is it the right time to tell a girl how you feel?

Never.

Duh.

Let `em figure it out for themselves, since that's one of the few things they're good at.

Women told us we had to get in touch with our feelings and learn to express them. We have.
Do they like us any better for it? No.
 colonelingus
Joined: 9/16/2007
Msg: 201 (view)
 
IS IT TRUE THAT A WOMAN SHOULDN’T PURSUE A MAN?
Posted: 11/9/2009 12:14:25 PM
^^^^ If that's all you got, that's some pretty lame "flirting". No wonder your success is modest at best.


Sure, I could be advised to flirt, but I'm SO BAD at it!

Most all women these days are bad at it, because they've been indoctrinated to believe it's beneath them to do so. In short, they've got no game, and have talked themselves in numerous ways into believing this is a Good Thing.

If you do a web search on the term "female game" you'll turn up nothing on flirting/seduction, but lots on video games (and one female game wardern). Nothing could say it all better than that.
 
Show ALL Forums