Human trafficking / sex slaves chat & forums.

Was that a by-product of a bad Browns team or is this a hint of the future for the Lions?

And all this is manufactured out of

It's your's to DISCOVER

.Maybe you should try the gum instead?

GOVERNMENT WARNING: According to the Surgeon General, quitting your he-she now can greatly be serious risks to your health. Butt be honest to yourself. You're just going to want one ten times as bad next week.

going to want one ten times as bad next week.

So YOU have taken my offer?

HEY WIZ! wass up dude! You still on Pof huh, cool,

what happened to The Giant's fans ?

What's up Krylon (Kebro)?!?! Welcome back!!!

Then we got Sum1(reel)Lypsinka....He TRULY talks out of his a$$.

It's better late than never, right?

you were waiting for

Giant fans don't lie

Do you think Ireland should get a replay after Irelands defeat?

If you consider deep sea diving a hobby at East River searching for crabs better, and with no luck. Then all power to you, at least you get a chance to swallow seamen.

You don't have to lie to the folks on POF

That's funny. I just forwarded that to five friends.

the kick was just too dangerous to be ignored by the ref!

how on earth did evans get away with what i would call chest breaking kick on drogba?

At least I come with a price,

you it's weekend hobby at the Strip

But not as more disgusting than your he-she

parts of him/her are excellent

Yup, you sure illustrated it in a football thread.

seems weasel wussington is a Vanna White impersonator in drag

What team did I switch? My team is any team that goes against any New York team....So phucking what you twit?

This is a football thread. How typical for New Yorker to always refer back to some other sport.

I agreed with everything except for the "but NOT because they don't have the ability to win..." part.

No, I didn't congratulate the Yankees, they don't deserve a congratulation, because after a while it gets boring the way they win the WS.

If the Giants could, they would have by now got Brady/Peyton (one of them as back up), Moss, Vin Jackson, Andre Johnson, (receiver), Bush, Johnson, Benson, (rush), Harrison, Phillips, etc (defence). Just like the NY Yankees do to get their championships.

but if your a redsox fans who complain the yankees "bought" there championship, then you should take back your 2004 championship....

The Red Sox payroll was at $125 million in 2004. Almost the same as this year of $122 million....Not much comparison. However, it is nothing compared to $201 million of the Yankees.

Sum1 and JaB are both off the bandwagon....When their team wins? Holy CRAP!!! They won't shut the phuck the up, but when they lose?

Bettman knows he can **stardize the sport however he wants and us real fans will continue watching. We'll b1tch and moan, but he won't lose us.

again since football is the most pop. sport. well atleast you know more then every one else,

your soultion for the mlb is to get rid of teams

no one is talking about getting rid of there teams,

feel sorry for those fans of those teams you want to get rid of.

It defied logic that the Detroit Lions in 2007 were 6-2 at the halfway point....to this day, I cannot explain it...I remember telling my friends, the Lions had to be the absolute worst 6-2 team in the history of the NFL.

I just hope the lion fans finally get to see their team do well. I kind of know how it feels being a pirate fan. We are pretty much in the same boat in terms of bad seasons year after year after year

so the nfl is only number one because of marketing, well people need to like the product that is being markted.

the fact is the more cities u have with a chance for the playoffs late in the year means the bigger the fan base, oh wait well i guess that happens because of the parity that the nfl has, and like u said the salary cap causes parity, so i guess it is because of the cap.

but are u telling me that the nfl doesnt have the best football players in the world?

look i get it we are just going to disagree on the cap thing, u think its about management more then the money, but yet u dont want the choices the management makes to cost the team, where i like the nfl because the managment is hold accountable for there choices in the sense that the teams has to pay, now to me thats more about the management then money.

its just odd that your soultion to mang. making bad choices is to spend more money and then turn around and say its about management and not money, its just odd.

I actually kind of agree with the notion of getting rid of some of the cellar dwelling teams but not for the purposes of freeing up any talent. More for the fact that it seems pointless to have teams in the league that seem to have no interest in really contending year in and year out. It's one thing to go through a rough spot, but you've got teams like the Pirates that haven't been good in 20 years. And it's not like they haven't had some good players come through their system either. They just get rid of all of them. They're becoming a farm team for other teams.

so the only way to level the feild is a cap, so a select handfull of team cant just outspend the other. now that would mean the players would make less but atleast the super stars would be more evenly spread out

ok back to the cap thing, u say that the d-backs didnt have a big payroll, well they where 8th in baseball but they where 3rd in the nl, so they did spend more then 80% of there league. also the difference between them and the highest payroll in the n.l. was just 2 mil.

the bottomline is that the yankees dont outsmart any team they just out spend them, my point is still its not the management its the money.

i never said that money buys u championship on a reg. basis, but what it does is make every other team that cant spend that type of money weaker.

and this talk of parity, u dont make sense, u speak of the nfl as if its just a bunch of ok players and thats why its full of parity, they are great players thats why they are in the nfl,

the nfl talent level is just as high as the mlb level.

you keep saying they " craft parity" look the yanks won 103 games and royals lost 103 games( i dont think those numbers are, but u get my point) ok so u will always have teams at the ends of the sprecturm, the same way the colts can go 13-3 and the browns go 3-13, u have this every sport, so if u take out the best and the worst teams, u are left with whats in the middle and in both sports its a bunch of avg. teams.

football has parity because it has leveled the playing feild, the mlb has parity because the playing feild is not level.

i just always wonder how much better the avg teams would be if they could sign big name free agents, or better yet if they could just keep there own stars and not be outbid by the same 4 or 5 teams that can afford to spend what ever they want.

sure sometime in football u will b out bid, but it wont be because they have a limitless payroll. maybe iam wrong maybe iam not, but then again the nfl is the most popular sport these days, maybe they did get it right.

last point, u said"a cap would serve to further conceal teams with poor management" u rwrong a cap exposes poor mangament, just stay with the colts/browns theme, the colts payroll this year is
$111,295,962( and this includes harrison, so it may be lower) and the browns payroll is $119,946,192 and they suck, again this is why drafting is so important and it also shows that the choices that the gm's make a direct effect on the team, thats the point of the cap to level the playing feild, if u make alot of bad choices it will effect ur team,

bad choices are made by management, but salary caps can trap such teams into a state of failure for a long time...yet there are many teams who know how to work the system better and manage to stay competative because they've made the salary cap work in their favor....teams who've made bad decisons suffer the most and have less opportunities to get back up whereas in MLB, a team can start spending more to acquire better players and if they make smart acquisitions they can get back up!

in the nfl u cant make bad choices and just spend more money to get rid of the problems.

exactly, which is why in MLB...the bad teams are the ones in which the owners don wanna spend much, whereas in NFL....if you've made bad choices in the past, the "system" penalizes you even further!!!!!!.....and you can't correct this even if you changed the management to more competent people...why would they wanna join a team that they can't do much to help!
------------------------------------------------------

In short, i fee l salary caps are an unnatural way to contain costs....i feel the free-market method is always superior...the only problem with MLB, is that they should penalize cheap owners for not putting their profits back into the team!

no i dont think its that easy but thats what seperates the good teams from the not good teams.

about the heisman, its a college award not a nfl award, so if u pick a player based on hype and not how that player fits there system then that team is making a big mistake, again the difference between a good org and a not so good org.

if it makes u fell better to say they are lucky then so be it,just keep this in mind the colts have 3 high round drafts picks out right now ( gonzalez, sanders, and jackson) but yet they are 8-0, what a lucky team i guess.

u asked why should a team have to relinquish a player when the cap has been reached, thats the point of a cap, its forces teams to handle the way they spend money and who they give it to,

if a team spends alot of money on a first rround player and he is a bust, it puts the team behind the 8ball you are right, again thats what seperates good teams from not so good teams.

look i understand the fact that as a yankees fan you dont want a cap, i think we both know that the yankees g.m is the most overrated in all of sports, i mean the guy spends more then anybody else but yet has only won 1 championship is the last 9 or 10 years,

just imagine if he could only spend 100mil a year or 120 mil a year, the yanks would be just a avg. team, that goes to show that they are not that well ran as a org.

what iam saying is the money the yanks spend keeps other teams from being able to get star free agents.

right in the aspect that u are dealing with a sport that has a cap, its the management that matters the most. the knicks and the clippers spend alot of money on the wrong players, thats why they stink. but ur point doesnt really make alot of sense because nobody spends about what the yankees spend therefore in there case its about the money not the management.

i see it the other way, if u put a cap in baseball that would shed light on poor management as well.

also i dont know this to b true but if u go back and look at those baseball teams that have won the w.s. over that time spand i would think alot of them where in the top % of payroll, for example the back to back years the bluejays won they had the top payroll, so again its the money not the management

how about drafting better, theres a idea

when a team from the largest city in america is in what do u think will happen?

to b honest i dont care what the ratings are, i dont work for the network that carried the w.s. so i didnt beneifit and unless u work for them i fail to see how it help u either.

take the spurs for example, great team right? well there ratings where not good when they went on there run of championships, so does that mean there not a good team?

to me a .500 team is avg, the nfl has more avg/or above teams then mlb, so how is that a crafted illusion? you say the yanks draw fans at other ballparks, well so do the steelers and they have a cap. last thing about the ratings, the nfl has outstanding ratings with a cap, oh wait i guess thats because every nfl fan is brainwashed.

if bledsoe doesnt get hurt there may not be a tom brady today, again it goes back to drafting well,i know this doesnt happen alot but it does happen and there have been other teams that have done well

If the yankees have a first round draft pick that is a bust, its not a big deal cause they can just go out in free agency and remedy the problem.

I blame baseball and the owners who claim they are "broke". IM a rockies fan, and there is no reason why the Monforts can go out and spend money like the yankees. Im not saying 200 million, cause the YES network is a cash cow. The rockies could be the phillies, about 110-130 million just to compete every year.

It doesnt take a genious to go out and sign sabaithia and tex.

$200 million a year payroll (that's only players) and there was no WS championship trophy for 9 years.
That makes $1.8 billion, with a B, spent without a WS championship.

Had the Yankees lost this years championship, they could have asked the government for bail out money.

If Sum1 was my cousin, I would have barred him from all family gatherings at my house.

Almost like when the Yankees picked up ARod and got nothing for 9 years.

But then again you speak for Red Sox fans that you claim would spit face?

We play a tough division where a team likes to spend crazy money, so how else are we suppose to compete.

you don't see any Philadelphia fans here bad mouthing anyone here

I heard yesterday that it's not likely that the Yankees will go after any big ticket free agents.

they are probably not going to sign both Matsui and Damon.

Mariano Rivera stated he would like to play five more years.

The AL Central has been busy already.

look at the nfl, i know that people say that has parity, and it does, but to me that a level playing feild, also just topoint out the fact the nfl has a higher % of teams with a .500 record or better then mlb does

The Red Sox have stayed consistent with their payroll.

the Yankees, they went out and bought their championship

As a Red Sox fan, which I probably speak for most of us. We truly don't care that we didn't win the WS....It would have been nice, but it doesn't even matter.

We are done with baseball for this year and have moved on to football.

We got our rings not once, but twice. That's all we ever wanted

So enjoy your 27th championship

Mark Teixeira and CC Sabathia maybe? I liked Tex when he was on the Rangers. And I've always liked CC. But I sort of look at both of those guys as turning heel like pro-wrestlers now that they're on the Yankees.

The Phillies were not playing like champions for a lot of the series. They weren't playing with any heart. They seemed to be playing like Cole Hamels felt; like they were just ready to go home and call it a season. The intensity that they had last year against the Rays just wasn't there.

Question was not how good the NY Donkeys were, the question is how bad the Phillies were.

Whatever happened to Pedro? The Pedro Martinez we used to know.

what happens if you leave Red Sox for 'mo money'

The best thing Pedro has done in his entire life was when he knocked down to the ground a fat old guy from Yankee management during a brawls between Yankees and red sox a few years back. That scene is priceless, I'll never forget that.

POF has a bunch of losers.

The losers have nothing else to do in their life but waste their times with other peoples profiles.

losers will do what losers do the best.

During my hiatus from pof,

I drove to Boston from carolinas and on my way I literally pissed on NYC. Yes, I stopped in NYC to piss.

baseball needs to put a cap on the money, its just outta hand that a team can spend that much more then anybody else

they should look at the nfl as there model.

So how is that going to work?

You paid for it, more like a quarter billion of it.

You guys can kiss my a$$

You know, understanding what you write can make you a better reader..

And being a better reader will help your retention process.[/sure]

Of course, Pal!........

I'm sorry if my "come-backs" hurt your feelings

...Its okay, Pal.....i forgive you, us New Yorkers have big hearts!...

I am talking about individual city teams from around the world being involved in this.

I thought I would stay away from POF for a while

his NY Donkeys are in WS and about to win it.

But he forgets that it's s WS between $208 million versus $111 million.

Donkey's not winning the WS this year is as unnatural as Donald Trump dating a 60 year old woman.

How about if I sh!t my sour grapes down your throat

they bought another championship

And who's "most of us"

Anyway, I was right when I said YANKEE SUCKS!!!

I hope the Yankees fall on their faces. Just to show money can't buy championships....

YANKEES SUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!

It doesn't even matter what anything you have said because none of it has any central part to what the league has done.

The league acknowledges that other teams were also involved

They also acknowledge that recording signals did not compromise the game,

Recording signals really doesn't give you the upper hand.

And it's not like Belichick flipped every rock to cheat

The difference between Belichick and everyone else that was doing it was that he got caught for it.

This is only believed by the eye's of New Yorkers...

And why is it that the Patriots are still good? It's a clear indication that the Patriots video taping had nothing to do with their success.

If Belichick was recording signals? Who do you think he learned that from? That's right PAL!!! Parcell.

I can't wait for the tell all book when Belichick retires.

Being the supervisor of sh!t sludge

Go phuck yourself!!!