To justify it we must theorise about things we can't see and things we can't detect.

Anyone here have any knowledge about the plasma cosmology theory? Has it been debunked?

It is not a matter of filling in the "gap" with God; its a matter of understanding that both possibilities are equally likely, when it concerns matters outside the confines (for lack of a better term) of this Universe.

just because we, mere humans in this dimension, can't test for other dimensions, doesn't mean they don't exist.

Ignorance is bliss.

NASA isnt using the SPT and WISE telescope scanning the infra red looking for brown dwarf objects for no reason.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2hW7xAGcpU

if you don't believe, you'll see,
I've already made contact,

Talking about errors Newtons, formula F=MA is frequently misunderstood and is incorrect. because Galilean Relativity is wrong, and acceleration is not a constant. The formula should read F=MGI or Force equals mass times gravitational intensity .

so far they have failed to physically and publicly demonstrate "something coming from nothing" to which there could be no other explaination.

their talking nonsense as many scientist's make a career of doing.

you don't need proof... then you are just saying things.

so it is Science.

I can't buy into government cover-ups because there is just no point.

by the way. "have we been looking at the aliens all these years? are the sunspot on the sun living creatures living in a breeding cycle? mat colonies of bacteria or something similar?

God could still exist.

I am aware that you have a little disconnect that atheism can be separated from an explanation for the existance of the universe and reduced to a lack of belief in god but that is hiding things from yourself.

and particles cant evolve their capabilites there is no way. so that means there is an absurd explanation, God.

I have repeated myself several times on why it is not science that the universe has always been here.

and thats what atheist's need to prove in order for their lack of belief to be true. for it is indeed possible to have a lack of belief in things that are real. many romans did not belive that germs or bacteria or anything smaller than what the eye could see existed. which we now know is not true so your lack of belief could be misleading.

I think the very first intelligent beings in the universe created artificial life and stuck it in to the physical bodies of the universe where it has multiplied and exists today in the stars and planets. Together with the aliens they increase the odds for life in various locations and designs the physical structure of the universe in a manner to their liking. They are responsible for life arising on this World and directed the rise of the MammAls by sending the meteorite which ended the Dinosaurs and contained the iridium that lead to the mutations that lead to us. We were intended. Just not by God, by the aliens and artificial intelligences. We're their Entertainment.

Name several because you said there are many.

Again "you dont know but you know it's not God" your picking and choosing what you will believe.

and that's not science. that's fooling yourself.

so all the odds build up in the direction of what i say. there really are no alternatives.

and to say we just haven't figured it out yet can be a denial and avoidance of the fact that matter shouldn't be here at all. it should not exist. there is no reason. it requires an act of creation according to theories of science. that means there is a God. the alternate theory that it was always here cannot be falsified, cannot be tested, and so is out of the running.

your just making stuff up.

What is the likelyhood that we alone are the only intelligent life to have ever in all the universe to have existed.

I think the very first intelligent beings in the universe created artificial life and stuck it in to the physical bodies of the universe where it has multiplied and exists today in the stars and planets.

t o be con vicing atheist have to explain how the universe started

a·the·ism   [ey-thee-iz-uhm] noun
1. the doctrine or belief that there is no God.
2.disbelief in the existence of a supreme being or beings.

atheist have no time machine

Mammals Made By Viruses

If not for a virus, none of us would ever be born.

In 2000, a team of Boston scientists discovered a peculiar gene in the human genome. It encoded a protein made only by cells in the placenta. They called it syncytin.

The cells that made syncytin were located only where the placenta made contact with the uterus. They fuse together to create a single cellular layer, called the syncytiotrophoblast, which is essential to a fetus for drawing nutrients from its mother. The scientists discovered that in order to fuse together, the cells must first make syncytin.

What made syncytin peculiar was that it was not a human gene. It bore all the hallmarks of a gene from a virus.

Viruses have insinuated themselves into the genome of our ancestors for hundreds of millions of years. They typically have gotten there by infecting eggs or sperm, inserting their own DNA into ours. There are 100,000 known fragments of viruses in the human genome, making up over 8% of our DNA. Most of this virus DNA has been hit by so many mutations that it’s nothing but baggage our species carries along from one generation to the next. Yet there are some viral genes that still make proteins in our bodies. Syncytin appeared to be a hugely important one to our own biology.

Evolution is a myth created by small minded haters to push their anarchist agenda.

Pope Pius XII declared that "the teaching authority of the Church does not forbid that, in conformity with the present state of human sciences and sacred theology, research and discussions . . . take place with regard to the doctrine of evolution, in as far as it inquires into the origin of the human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter—[but] the Catholic faith obliges us to hold that souls are immediately created by God" (Pius XII, Humani Generis 36). So whether the human body was specially created or developed, we are required to hold as a matter of Catholic faith that the human soul is specially created; it did not evolve, and it is not inherited from our parents, as our bodies are.

Great profile, but I think its got to be fake.......

Faith is meaningless without the possibility of doubt.

ahh yes, the magic of natural selection.

which, by the way, only gets RID of living things.

natural selection has never been seen or known to add a microscopic piece of new genetic information to dna.
[it's in your own dogmatic sources]

as in;

increasing the amount of base pairs in dna,
from first life to present forms of immense amounts of dna.

yes, unproven dogmatic theories abound.
gene duplication, etc.

evolution is a fact=the best example of dogma.

evolutionist are STILL squabbling over any and all mechanisms that can be seen as factual.
there aren't any, as far as many can see.

I'm like dude, past is past. What's acceptable during ancient times is obviously NOT applicable in the present. Although I don't know if you can point out ANYthing that Jesus did in NT that is STILL not applicable today.

So believing in God automatically makes you anti intellectual aka ignorant?

Then why are there scientists that believe in God

and why oh why are there more much more believers than non believers? YOU DO KNOW IT'S A STATISTICAL FACT! ? So what? The world is populated by ignoramous sapiens? lolololol.

This is why I believe. I can not, will not accept that when you die, that's it.

I believe in eternal life after death. Jesus promised that. John 3:16 anyone?

And no A-holes here or in other forums in future I will go to that will make me change my mind EVER again. MY truth is obviously NOT your truth.

I think there is alot of truth to that Mayan calendar stuff

you are not open to any evidence that there might be a god, so I won't give you any, and you have heard it all before.

there is also no concrete evidence of many scientific ideas that are perpetuating society.

''If we go back far enough, we are all related''

well, I'll be a monkeys uncle.

we know exactly were it all is and the reasons for the poor shots are the orbiting sat is moving to quick and the objects are only metres across ..

its not just pretty pictures though , it's historically one of the greatest achievements of modern history , your telling me we can get close up pics of the ice on the moon titan.

as first stated im just surprised the amount of money spent on it all and the historical impact it has for our species why it isnt more clearly viewed and admired as time goes by

i get exactly what your saying i just thought with something as historically important as the moon landing more aerial pics of the sites with better clarity would of been produced yrs ago , and shown to the nation's, unless you search you don't get shown anything

what surprises me is why when its such a big deal first man on the moon historic moment is there only one recent pic that isnt really that good anyway? i would of thought it would of been pushed in our faces at say historic intervals after the event ?

dont we have the tech to be able to photograph these luna objects in more detailed clarity yet ?

If you can explain, to me, how an isolated culture in ancient TURKEY. Had the same originating story and names of their gods as an equally isolated culture of say.... South America, then yes, you would be correct.

But some things that you have to think about. number 1. NO ships have ever been found that prove that intercontinental travel was possible in those days (as a matter of fact, stating that ancient, primitive cultures had the smarts to navigate and cross oceans is already a HUGE argument amongst mainstream science). No 2. Did they fly? hmmm.. No 3. The stories that these people talk about says nothing about some culture landing on their shores, witnessing to them, their beginnings. No 4. All of the cultures that DO share the same stories all talk about their experiences with their star gods, not their earthly brethren.

And it's not me saying that they couldn't do it. It's history/geography/science scholars that believe they weren't smart enough to do it.

the Piri Reis map composed in 1510 or so. How did that guy know what the shore line and underlying islands of Antarctica looked like if our science says that the entire continent has been under miles of ice for eons?

I've studied everything from the original Sumerian creation story (which is eerily similar to our Genesis story, with names of their first man being "Adamu" and their original creation spot being called "Eden", pronouced with a soft E instead of a hard E like the Christian story of creation)

Anyways, here is a SMALL list of the scientists that support the theory, in full, and also believe that there is a massive cover up

Plus, your post is like saying, if God made us, then who made God? It's an answer that can't be reached.

What is evil?