online dating service
REGISTER | MAIL/PROFILE | HELP | NOW ONLINE | SEARCH | RATING | FORUMS | SUCCESS STORIES

 

     
Posted In Forum:
Home   login   MyForums  
Show ALL Forums  
 
 Author Thread: how do u handle being a virgin past 25
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 46 (view)
 
how do u handle being a virgin past 25
Posted: 8/17/2005 7:33:02 PM
I guess I don't feel akward saying this online but I have a very tough time with this subject to say the least. I've only admitted it to a couple of really close friends of mine and they had no idea. For a long time I was the "I'm going to wait until I'm married" or "in love" old fashioned type guy. I waited to long and now I'm 26 and a virgin lol, its affected my confidence around women and most importantly my communication skills with women, especially ones I find sexually attractive. Its ironic because I'm one of those guys that just adores women and now there is some mental block in my head that is keeping me from doing so. Someone said sex today is based on societal pressure and that if you're not happy without sex you won't be happy with it. That maybe true but not for everybody, each person's situation and personality is different as a result so are the consequences of their actions.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 65 (view)
 
Pitbulls Banned!!!
Posted: 8/7/2005 11:55:34 AM
As far as Presa-Canarios go, part of the breed is Bullmastiff. I owned a bullmastiff, 125lbs who was socialized and trained from day 1 and the worse she'd do is drool over you. My Sister bred them and would refuse to sell to anyone she thought was getting one as an "ego booster" (and would therefore train it to be aggressive).


Just because a dog has bull mastiff in its lie doesn't change a think. Presa's are gladiator dogs, they were created to fight on the Canary islands. Doesn't make them bad dogs just means they have the same history as pitbulls.


Personally, I figure that dogs over, say 10-15 pounds should not be allowed in the cities at all, unless they are being leased (YES rented!) from a certified guard dog company. It would stop a lot of attacks, YET would allow ppl to have a guard dog if they chose to that the public could be assured has been properly trained and is being cared for properly.


You obviously don't know anything about working dogs. I'm guessing that means you know very little about dogs in general referring this statement. A working dog is a highly trained animal that has a special bond with its handler, it cannot be passed around to strangers. This could lead to disaster. Hey I have a great idea along similiar lines as yours, I think we should ban anyone over 40 years old from cities. I'm sure that would cut down on more crime than banning some dog.

Back to the topic, lets looks at bite statistics. How bad are they really? Max of ten deaths per year? Hey people newsflash: people die! Car accidents, train wrecks, planes, bombs, killer bees, cougars, sugar, red meat, cancer, aids etc. Doesn't mean you start curtailing freedoms because of a few attacks. That's part one of my reasoning part two involves analysis "problem dogs" and the effect of the ban itself i.e. does it really work?

Its simple: the owner is responsible for the dogs behaviour. Any dog can attack a person, the problem is dogs like Presas, Pitbulls, and Rottweilers are bundles of muscle with extremely powerful jaws. Even minor attacks can be deadly. They need to be under control, they need solid training, and they should never be left alone unsupervised with children NEVER. Its not the dogs fault for being powerful, its the ownsers fault for being stupid. Furthermore back yard breeding should be banned, breeding should require licenses and proof of intention, and finally dog ownership should require attendance to an approved trainer.

Banning a certain breed is no solution. Ban pitbulls and people will start breeing rotties, ban rotties and people will breed shepherds, or create a whole new breed etc. There are far better solutions however people tend to overreact and fall prey to sensationalism e.g."killer pitbulls." One has only to look at the breed bans in Italy, where over 100 breeds are banned including border collies, stupid. The relationship between man and dog is an old one and frankly if the government wants to ban my son (my dog) they will have to come get him from my cold dead hands.


Wull... what the HECK do I need to know about the breed if they kill people and can't be controlled by their owners?

Do housecats do this? (no)
Do little white rats do this? (I don't think so)
Do Keeshunds do this? (certainly not)
Do goldfish do this? (Uh uh)

What part don't you understand about the point I'm making?


The point is its the fault of irrespnsible dog owners not the dog breed. All the animals you mentioned are incapable of violence. Looks its very simple, sometimes owning a dog is like owning a weapon. Weapons aren't banned because people are expected to use them reponsibly.


They should not be kept in a family setting .Think that they are used by security companies or security forces which is the best situation for them.The German shepherd is a good dog,and entirely different altho he needs watching bcuz of his size..We had one.Very mild and loyal to the family.Protective guard dog too.


The thing about Shepherds is their demographic has changed. All the thugs and gangsters want pitbulls and rotties, shepherds are out of style. Meaning that more responsible people tend to own them. I have a Shepherd, very loyal and protective, he will bite though. If someone walks into my house he will charge at them snarling and angry and will most likely bite. I say most likely because he isn't bite trained as the risk factor goes up. Thing is my dog is under control, when he's outside I'm watching him, when he's playing with kids I'm watching him, he's gone to obedience classes and I chose to educate myself on training him. Most of those dogs that bite don't get any of this necessary attention.


Why do we have a problem outlawing this breed in populated areas when it's an obvious danger to human life?


The whole point is its the owner who is the obvious danger not the dog. Prove otherwise and I'll agree, irresponsible owners do not have control over their dogs and thats the problem. Take my dog for example, in the wrong hands he could be vicious.


people should know that a large, american red-nosed pitbull can pull close to 4 tonnes for 60 yards

try holding that back on a leash. That's why I am always alert when I see a skinny little girly girl with a big bruiser pit: it's nuts!


Two words: Prong Collar.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 14 (view)
 
DEA attempts to extradite Canadian Prince Of Pot for selling seeds.
Posted: 8/7/2005 11:32:46 AM
Screw em, theres no way we should extradite him. He's not selling weed he's selling seeds, furthermore its not his fault Americans are buying them. In Canada we should not be bound by American law in the slighest bit. If Canadian law says its illegal to sell seeds and ship them to the U.S. then give him a trial here, otherwise forget it.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 67 (view)
 
Should the Minute Men Shoot back into Mexico?
Posted: 8/7/2005 11:28:29 AM
If someone is shooting at you theres only two options

1. Run away and don't come back
2. Shoot back

Are Minute Men sanctioned by the gov't? Offering them protection would be like officially sanctioning them, I'm not to sure on the background here but if these Minute Men are a rogue group (no matter what their intention) they won't get any protection.

How about spending more money on border guards instead.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 3 (view)
 
Sum up the Summer with 1 word
Posted: 8/7/2005 11:20:50 AM
hot
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 23 (view)
 
Stanford Prison Experiment
Posted: 8/2/2005 11:05:13 PM
He's trolling the key to a valid experiment is a representative sample set and randomization within/between groups. Hence political ideology is also randomized between groups and not a factor.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 46 (view)
 
world population is too high
Posted: 8/2/2005 10:57:57 PM

Actually christianity and buddhism are very similiar.


Sort of but not really. Buddhism doesn't even mention a God, Buddha himself never said he believed in God, nor did he believe in heaven or hell, Buddhism believes in reincarnation, the eight fold path to enlightenment, meditation Christianity does not etc.

There is a theory that Jesus visited buddhist India/Tibet during his lost years and that he read some Buddhist scriptures. I think there are a lot of similarities between many of the major religions, but for the most part there are central tenants that are vastly different.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 44 (view)
 
world population is too high
Posted: 8/2/2005 10:47:06 PM

Eddie Eddie....don't get so wound up, it's only a discussion. No I don't presently know any sikhs, but I did know a couple in the past...they were actually very nice people. I'm just going by what I have read on the religion, it really doesn't matter to me if they are related to hindu, muslim, or pagan for that matter. Since you have a background in Sikhism I trust you know what you're talking about and agree...Sikh has nothing to do with muslim. I'll take your explanation that info states islam is part of thier religion because of the belief in one God, that is fine and I have no problem admitting my error. I'm sorry, you're right, I'm wrong, A sikh is not a muslim.....


I get hyper active sometimes, my apologies it just kind of upset me because honestly the biggest oppressors of sikhs in the early days were the muslim rulers of India at the time. They killed and tortured sikhs and tried forcing conversion at the point of the sword or through various "creative" forms of torture such as sawing people in half, putting people on railroad tracks, burying people alive etc. Countless more lives were lost in those dark days than 911, Iraq, and all terrorist attacks in the last 50 years combined.

As far as I know there is not a single page of the Koran in the Sikh scriptures (I can find out for sure soon enough, I come from a Catholic/Sikh background but I don't practice any religion myself). Just trust me when I say that Sikhism is as different from Islam as Christianity is from Buddhism.

I agree with you though, the world would be a lot better place without some of the regimes that are currently in power. The leaders of Islamic nations have always been problematic, for the most part they are corrupt and totalitarian and as such these countries just don't understand how democracy works. They haven't known anything else for around 1500 years and its time to change. Its not really the average muslim's fault though, change can be painful but it will come.

I'm not sure about the multicultural face of toronto but maybe its a matter of integration. We bring in many immigrants but at the same time they aren't really well accepted or integrated into society. In response they tend to cluster together in groups as a sort of safety net. I don't think immigrants should be constantly accepted, I think we should take what we need to fill gaps e.g. certain skillsets, or to stimulate business, and we should only take the best of the best. We shouldn't be taking in people just to be nice though, it has to be for our advantage.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 19 (view)
 
Stanford Prison Experiment
Posted: 8/2/2005 6:16:04 PM
Dryad - I remember the Milgram experiment from school as well, thats the one they use to teach psych students about unethical experimentation. Very very interesting stuff that just proves how when faced with the right situation good people can do an about face and do very bad things. Some of those subjects were traumatized for months after the Milgram experiment when they realized how easily the submitted to the pressure.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 39 (view)
 
world population is too high
Posted: 8/2/2005 4:56:20 PM
13rthportal - why do you continue to argue points that I have already proven outtright wrong.

Umm...because you haven't proven my point wrong. This is the definition of Sikhism;

"follower of sikhism, an indigenous montheistic religion of India which combines elements of Hinduism and Islam; it was founded in the 16th century by the guru Nanak.
www.northern.edu/hastingw/indiaglos.html"


That would be outright insulting to the many sikhs whom I personally know.


And why would that be? I wouldn't be offended if someone called me christian, or catholic...and my beliefs are more new age.
As I've posted above, the definition I read on many sites of Sihk is both aspects of hindu & islam...but if you say its not, then whatever...that's the way I understand it, so we have a difference of opinion.


Look its very simple, you don't know any sikhs nor do you know the religion whereas I do. Catholics, protestants, methodists etc are all Christian so yeah theres no insult, Sunni and Shia are both Islamic again there is no insult. However Sikhism and Islam are completely different religions with the only thing "borrowed" from Islam being the concept of one god. That definition you dug up is very basic and frankly its wrong, its like saying Islam is the same thing as Judaism or Christianity because all three are montheastic.

The bottomline: you don't any sikhs, you don't know anything about the religion, you are a person who generalizes without regard to knowledge or facts of the situation whereas I'm part Indian and am familiar with all the major religions in the region, the history of the area, and half my family is sikhs. i.e. I have the credentials to offer a factual opinion where as you do not.

Allow me to reiterate Islam and Sikhism are completely different religions, that follow completely different scriptures. The only real similiarity being the belief in one god (belief in one god and reincarnation are primarily why your weak definition states "combines elements of hinduism and islam"), you persist with your baseless assumption that Sikhs are Muslims which is simply an ignorant thing to say. I posted a link to wikipedia why don't you read that instead of trite one line definition, i know the one liner is easier to comprehend but as I mentioned above it is incorrect.

Its really simple to understand: you were wrong about sikhs being muslims, this is not a difference of opinion, you are also wrong about the mosques "spreading like wildfire," and you were wrong (as someone pointed out above) about the number of muslims in canada e.g. approx .9%.

Why do you continue to argue, a smart person would admit she is wrong and sit down and maybe read some books or go out and somehow educate herself so as to clear up her misconceptions. Maybe your opinion would count for more if you could back up your
suppositions or take a step back and listen to reason. It just annoys me when people post stuff that is dead wrong and doesn't actually represent the world that is around them but rather only represents what is in their head. Anytime I see this sort of thinking I will slam it hard.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 8 (view)
 
First it was WMD's, then it was democracy. How do we feel about making a republic into a theocracy?
Posted: 8/2/2005 2:54:25 PM
it did have a secular government----so did many communist countries, dictatorships, plutocracies, democracies, and more...........the fact that they were secular in no way made them republics. look up republic, and you'll see quite clearly that iraq was no republic.


While I don't think Iraq was a republic I just want to confirm that you aren't implying democracy is somehow a requirement for a republic

e.g. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
Islamic Republic of Iran etc.

I think the point OP is making is that Iraq was not previously a theocracy under the baathist regime and hence not a safe haven for islamic fundamentalist terrorists:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ba%27athist
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 4 (view)
 
Niger - two points I'd like to make
Posted: 8/2/2005 1:10:56 PM
Because in general the governments of islamic nations don't really get along. Did you ever
notice any Islamic country offering permanent homes to the thousands of displaced palestinians? Bottomline is other countries don't really care about eachother, lets go a step further and say the bottomline is people don't really care about eachother. Theres always alterior motives involved. For example look at your typical Christian aid group, their not so much their to help as they are to convert.

Taking care of others always comes second to taking care of yourself. Yeah yeah people will argue all kinda of nonsense to the contrary but its human nature.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 3 (view)
 
First it was WMD's, then it was democracy. How do we feel about making a republic into a theocracy?
Posted: 8/2/2005 12:34:04 PM
Damn wouldn't that suck if 40 years from now we look back on this conflict and find it to be the catalyst of the creation of a middle eastern super power rooted in the unification of post war iraq and iran. Something that would never have happend under Sadam (probably one of the reasons he was supported by the west in the first place).

WW3!
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 32 (view)
 
world population is too high
Posted: 8/2/2005 11:51:22 AM
13rthportal - why do you continue to argue points that I have already proven outtright wrong. Once again you start your post the exact same way as before by saying:


Yes I do. I know sikhs are not muslims; they do however both follow ISLAM or parts of Islam.


That would be outright insulting to the many sikhs whom I personally know. Once again it only proves your ignorance, the only thing similiar between a sikh and a muslim is that muslims sometimes wear turbans. Other than that they are completely different religions, based on completely different principles. In fact Sikhs spent a good 200 years fighting muslim rulers in India. Muslims follow the Koran, Sikhs have a completely different book called the Adi Granth that is in no way related to the Koran.

The point is your statement is outright false and you're spreaded innacurate information that is not factually based upon anything historical. Once again I suggest you do some reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikhism and educate yourself.

Basically the rest of your post is full of crap you made up in your head, want immigrations stats go to http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/pub/facts2003/permanent/14.html and you'll see that muslims countries do not nearly top the chart of incoming immigrants. Problem with you is you clearly don't know what a muslim is.

You seem like a paranoid person who doesn't base her posts on fact. The thoughts in your head are not an objective source of information. For example you don't understand the difference between a sikh and a muslim meaning that you probably don't know the difference between a sikh temple a mosque or a buddhist temple. In your head they are all the same because you're ignorant. Do you not see the problem with that?

How 'bout the fact that our lands are being torn down and housing / mosques being built like wildfire for the influx of immigrants? How bout the fact that as soon as they come here they sponge off the governement and get handed everything?


Uh yeah sure look at all those mosques being built like "wildfire". Once again I only see ignorance. I see all kinda of religious places being built, churches, mosques, temples etc. Not a huge influx of any one of these in particular, unlike you I can tell the difference between these multiple places of worship, you have proven you cannot.

Sponge off the governement?? You obviously don't understand how the point system works. As an immigrant you are required to invest X amount of dollars into the Canadian economy or make points through various skillsets that we need e.g. engineerS, doctor, programmer etc.

I find it very interesting that you come from a native background (partially) and would mention "sponge off the government." You want to save tax dollars how about equalizing the balace between first nations and regular canadians. First nations people of canada drain way more of my hard earned tax dollars than any immigrant. Billions of tax dollars spent on indian affairs (or whatever the ministry is called now a days), tax breaks for natives, reservations, etc.

How 'bout the fact that these people wont even stand up for the national anthem, have had our lords prayer taken out of schools.....the list goes on and on.


Kids go to school to learn not pray, what this has to do with anything is beyond me. Every immigrant I know would stand up for the anthem.

The question you need to ask yourself is what exactly do you contribute to society that is so great? I can pretty much guarantee that I can find examples of countless immigrants who love this country as much or more than you do, do not spread hate, earn far more revenue for the government than you, partake in more social service, donate to charity more, educate themselves and their families etc.

Its annoying when people think they are so high and mighty but in reality they don't look at themselves before judging others.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 1 (view)
 
Stanford Prison Experiment
Posted: 8/2/2005 1:11:32 AM
I was watching a German film called "Das Experiment" the other week and it got me thinking. Great movie by the way highly reccomended...

Well turns out the movie was based on a real experiment i.e. The Stanford Experiment, I won't get into the details but basically normal everyday people volunteered and were randomly assigned roles as prison guards or prisoners. The experiment had to be cancelled early on in due to some disturbing outcomes.

For details see http://www.prisonexp.org/ or just google "Stanford Prison Experiment"

This has some interesting insight into prisoner abuse and in general how a position of power can change an ordinary person into a saddistic one. This is also kind of related to other famous experiments on "group think" that study how differently people will behave when they become part of a group e.g. prison guards, nazis, republicans (heehee), islamic extremists etc. Seems to me that the average person when put into the correct situation is capable of very extreme behaviour, far more than one would think is commonsense.

In some way its to bad these experiments are unethical as further study might help find ways to avoid corruption of power.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 23 (view)
 
world population is too high
Posted: 8/2/2005 12:46:29 AM

Eastern cultures ARE taking over. I don't know how much time you've spent in Toronto Ontario, but we are over-run with punjabi, sihks, iranians, and other eastern country peoples, which I refer to as muslims, since almost all of them practice some form of that religion. I was on the ttc (our transit system) the other day, and I was the only white person on every bus I took. 20 years ago this was definately not so, so I know for a fact just by walking up the streets of toronto that muslims are breeding fast in our city. You dont even need to see statistics to see it with your own eyes.

You are right that it takes more courage not to hate, but it's damn hard when your own "kind" is being pushed out of your own country, and now we have to worry about constant terrorist threats.


Once again your ignorance shines allow me to elaborate:

1. You classify Sikhs as Muslims. Enough said.

2. "Eastern Country peoples" what does that even mean, you show consistent confusion between the mid east, southeast asian, the far east, orient etc.

3. Didn't you say you're half native on some other thread, if thats true I don't exactly see what is "your kind."

4. How are you being pushed out of "your" country. Newsflash you don't own this country, you maybe a Canadian citizen but its not "your" country. At least not anymore than any other Canadian citizen.

5. I don't know about you but most people I know don't worry about constant terrorist threats were I live (Vancouver) unless they are a bit messed up upstairs.


If we continue to let it happen, we will one day be a middle eastern dominated country.


Middle Easterns might make 1% of Canada's population, the odds of this happening are oh I'd say off the top of my head about .000000000000000000000000000000000001 %

If you're going to make such ridiculous generalizations I suggest you start by backing them up with some sort of factual basis. Although I'm skeptical that you can do this, the simple fact that you can post messages would indicate that you are able to read. For a first step I suggest you pick up an atlas and locate the middle east on the map and take note of which countries make up the middle east.

I'm not insulting you but your posts indicate that you are a very ignorant person, and education is the key to defeating ignorance. All I can say is go to the local library and university and pick up some good books and read...
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 50 (view)
 
No Soul?
Posted: 8/2/2005 12:29:09 AM
yvnot - c. is a great choice and one I try stick with but eventually the gears start turning a,b keep coming back and ruining the party

frivo - I haven't made up my mind, and to say people can't convince me that alternative explanations exist would be premature. I've read what you've posted and I simply don't agree as unfortunately there is no hard (ie. controlled scientific proof) that past lives, astrology, gemology, psionics are anything but snakeoil. I also don't understand your concepts of energy, unfortunately for your theory energy is a measureable thing. There is a direct relationship between mass and energy and conversions between them are, through applied physics, measurable. There is absolutely no reason to believe in "energy ghosts" or such things as if they existed they could be measured.

Anyways the fact that a and b are in direct contension with eachother and yet neither one makes sense or seems to be comprehensible by our brains gives me some solace.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 92 (view)
 
Violence Against Women Act II
Posted: 8/2/2005 12:04:03 AM
Okay anyways back to the point, if this act creates harsher punishments for men who abuse their wives/gf/partners etc then so be it. Guess what? Physically men and women are not equals. If you can't handle that than keep your mouth shut because you haven't seen this crap happen first hand. I've recently witnessed this sort of abuse and all I can say is that it broke my heart.

Anyone who prays on someone who is weaker than them is a coward and deserves harsher punishment, be he a pedophile, a rapist, or a man who physically abuses a woman. That's the bottomline and if someone wants to make that a law then good on em.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 47 (view)
 
It would appear that the freedom of the internet is about to end. EVERYONE Please read.
Posted: 8/1/2005 11:45:38 PM
ThatSong - Nicely put. Unfortunately the person you're responding to probably doesn't care about his freedom. In terms of government censoring the internet theres are countries that do it, China for example. Not sure how successfully though.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 14 (view)
 
world population is too high
Posted: 8/1/2005 8:27:21 PM
Who told you world population is to high??????? There are estimates that predict that the workd can support BILLIONS more than already in existence.

As for 13thportal her constant racism, religio centricism, and need to bring in terrorism into every one of her posts is getting pretty damn annoying. What exactly does terrorism or the war in iraq have to do with world over population. You send all immigrants out of Canada and the country collapses, its a nation of immigrants.

4sexy - I agree ppl are losing their minds
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 196 (view)
 
Should marijuana be legalized....
Posted: 8/1/2005 6:43:42 PM
yeah anyways weed is fairly harmless, no worse than alcohol and is a waste of our tax money to enforce its regulation.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 47 (view)
 
No Soul?
Posted: 8/1/2005 6:24:32 PM
Okay anyways it seems that the bottomline remains there is absolutley no credible evidence for a soul, spirit, or whatever airy fairy name we give it. As such when we die we simply fade to black so to speak, nothingness, existence terminated for all eternity. The only realistic concept I can think of that would come close to life after death is through the passing of ones genetic code onto subsequent generations e.g. ones children. Because a portion of your genetic make up lives on through your progeny then in some sense we do have a vague continuation after death. That's the best I can come up, still leading me to believe theres little point to life since one is set to fade into nothingess within a few years anyways. Good ol nihilism makes some good points after all I suppose.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 124 (view)
 
how to stop terrorism
Posted: 8/1/2005 4:39:58 PM
I don't know about the situation in Canada, but the oldest human fossils in the USA are caucasians.


Uh thats hardly a fact, do a search on "clovis", "new clovis theory" etc there is a theory that Frech "Solutreans" made it to North America accross the ocean but that is contentious and unproven at best.

As far as I know its not proven what "race" kennewick man is

http://www.mnh.si.edu/arctic/html/kennewick_man.html

furthermore he isn't the old human fossil found in north america, he was only 9200 years old vs this 13,000 year old fossil http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0779260.html

there are new theories that suggest the glacier barrier between alaska and british columbia was opened sooner than was thought and the whole of the americas populated much earlier than was thought. by asiatic people crossing the bering straight, don't be so quick to quote stuff that may appeal to you without telling the whole story and contentions involved.


Here's another article that mentions the first people may have arrived as early as 40,000 years ago. No where does it say that these people were caucasian:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4650307.stm

The race of ancient americans is fairly irrelevant either way.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 76 (view)
 
I'm also tired of people sniping.
Posted: 7/31/2005 12:22:24 PM

Eddie1979, if you attack everyone, no one is going to take you seriously. Why don't you try posting your opinions with logic instead of contempt please?


I'm not attacking everyone, if you'll notice i've only targetted two people in this thread and if you see something illogical in my posts feel free to point it out.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 35 (view)
 
hard to respect women
Posted: 7/31/2005 10:34:33 AM
omg girls are people!
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 73 (view)
 
I'm also tired of people who refuse to face the facts...
Posted: 7/31/2005 10:24:51 AM

like Eddie1979 (who, BTW it should be noted made no attempt whatsoever to refute the things I said about Islam. He can't, because they are all true) who are so wrapped up in politically correct self-righteousness that they deny the reality of what Islam is, just as millions deluded themselves about the reality of National Socialism and Hitler's goals in the 30's.


Do I really have to go dig up bible quotes and koran quotes and start comparing them? I've done it and guess what they are both equally violent and have similiar content. I'm sure the same can be said for Judaism, hey guess what I got a newsflash for you: Violence is a part of the human condition, always has, and always will be. If violence was truly the issue here you wouldn't be preaching for Muslims to enlist in the army, your argument is convoluted on the one hand you seem to abhore violence while on the other you clearly promote it. You can't have it both ways. If you want to say all three monotheastic religions that originate from the area are inherently violent then okay fine, as there plenty of evidence in the "books" to support that. Islam has been around for what now? 1,500 years? That's a long time, if it was inherently evil I would expect there to be a lot more trouble than a few years of terrorism.

If you really want a good comparison lets work on making a chart that is divided by country and religion, on one side list the religion on the other list the number of deaths the faction is responsible for. The side with the greatest # of deaths divided by the number of years it has existed wins. In terms of inherent evil that is, thats what you're concerned with correct?

The fact is that there are many peaceful muslims around the world, fact is I myself know many. Fact is there are also extremists, fact is there are extremists in every faction not just islam. Have you read the Koran cover to cover? Don't bull**** me I know you haven't so I wonder where your mystical information is coming from.


Islam has ALWAYS been a religion that expanded by means of the sword. It is a religion that has ALWAYS been intolerent of "infidels". In the 10th Century Islam swept through North Africa, a peaceful and prosperous Christian region for hundreds of years, with fire and sword. Chrisitians who made the pilgrimage to the Holy Land in the centuries following were abused, robbed, and gnerally treated with scorn and contempt. Finally under Charles the Hammer in Spain and later at the summons of Pope Urban Christendom fought back, and the Moslem tide that threatened to swamp all of Europe was stemmed.


What exactly are you trying to say here?? Are you trying to say European Christians were peaceniks at the time? You know you'd be wrong if you were trying to say that. Peaceful North Africa?!?? Wow this is some one sided opinionated crap, thats why I didn't comment on it. Neither Europe nor North Africa were peaceful regions. In fact Europe hasn't been a peaceful zone until after WW2 and guess what they aren't islamic.

You've heard of a place called Bosnia right? A place were peaceful Muslims were slaughtered on a mass scale by christian serbians. Theres one example for you to research. Do I really have to give you a historical play by play of European atrocities or North African violence? I don't know of any faction in history that has been consistently non violent, except maybe Tibet and a few other buddhist populations. Other than that
most people have little right to preach, especially you as an American whos country seems to consistently fight a new war each decade (or less) that goes by. So seriously stop complaining, do some research, and quit trying to be so one sided with your propoganda crap.



Why should young moslems, in particular, enlist? Maybe, just maybe, if their faith is so important to them, and they feel it it being perverted by the terrorists, young moslem men might feel a greater moral imperative to take action and join the military than others. It hasn't happened because their allegiance to their moslem "brothers" is greater than the allegiance they have to their fellow citizens. On top of that, it seems to me that they don't because they agree with the the goals of the terrorists.


You still make no sense. The fact of the matter is that there is absolutley no reason for the average Muslimi to "prove" himself and enlist in the army. Sounds like you got something to prove though, maybe you should consider enlisting. Again your statement seems a bit delusional.



That's why we'd be better off if they would all decide to go back to their countries of origin (and don't be disingenuous--you're aware, I'm sure, that for the vast majority, their countries of origin are in the Middle East.)


You do know that the most populous muslim nation is not in the middle east right? Seriously do you really have any practical knowledge on the subject you're debating or did you just do a couple of google searches.


Google it.


What exactly do you want me to google. Depending on what I'm searching for I can basically find an answer aligns with whatever opinion I choose. Google is not really an academic/objective tool as it is the searcher that really drives the result of his query.

If I search "muslim burning flag" I'm sure somthing will come up, does it mean its representative of the population in question. No. Take a course on basic stats it will help you understand the intricacies of population sampling.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 65 (view)
 
I am REALLY tired of this It's not Islam--it's a few fanatics bullsh*t
Posted: 7/30/2005 11:09:40 PM

For starters they could speak up.


I've seen countless news articles that describe this exact thing. i'm sure you have as well.


They don't have a problems speaking up about schools not serving Halal food prompting thousands of parents to demand cafeteria food match the needs of the local Muslim community.

Or students on numerous campuses demanding a place to pray.

Or why aren't they filling the streets up in protests burning something or carrying an oversized picture of someone and yelling whatever it is they yell?

Which reminds me the Middle East is the only place I have ever seen protesters carrying these large framed pictures.


I seriously doubt that the majority of muslims do that sort of thing. Tough to make judgement call without seeing credible numbers that somehow measure levels of fanaticism. Couple of CNN exerpts just doesn't do it, needs to be based on sound principles.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 295 (view)
 
London - Haven for terrorists
Posted: 7/30/2005 10:01:52 PM


Is there a better solution than the melting pot?; other than ,MUCH lower immigration into other countries?

(I trust that you will wait untl someone who is a thinker provides the answer for you here then aptly back them on their word, but hey, the question is posed to you anyways)


You're from Canada, so I'm going to assume that you understand and are aware of what multiculturalism is. It's been around here for decades and is vastly different to the melting pot concept. Furthermore it seems to be working just fine.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 13 (view)
 
U.S. Ready To Invade & Nuke Iran
Posted: 7/30/2005 9:56:44 PM
Attacking Iran would most likely cause WW3. Too much to soon. For now espionage and diplomacy will work just fine, Bush knows this.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 68 (view)
 
beachcomberbenn, I thought...
Posted: 7/30/2005 9:47:18 PM
Seems to me that the war against terrorism is doing just fine, seriously take a step back and look at the big picture. How many people are terrorists killing per year? Maybe 5,000 - 10,000? Seriously thats not very much. Compared to the deaths caused in Iraq by shock and awe, genocide in Rwanda, Bosnia, Sudan, hunger in Ethiopia, terrorism is small potatoes.

Only reason terrorism is "hot" right now is because its for the most part its in direct opposition with America. Kind of like the Russians were decades ago, except the Russians were far more powerful and killed many more ppl (e.g. Stalin, Lenin). As long as WMDs are kept under control and out of extreme hands Terrorism is in essence contained and losses minimized.

Terrorism is nothing new, there will be a few bombings every year, all over the world. I seriously doubt this will change. As long as casualties are minimized and the tools that extremists can use diminished I'd be willing to call the "War on Terror" fairly successful.



They probably comprise about 2% of our population, and are also made up of people who believe in equal rights for animals, atheists, and other deviants.


2%?? Hahahahaha. Atheists and other deviants hahahahaha. Hahahaha oh that's great please impart more of your intelligence and wisdom upon us oh sagely one. Hahahahahah. Hey question: how come you haven't mentioned Jesus in any of your posts yet?
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 62 (view)
 
I am REALLY tired of this It's not Islam--it's a few fanatics bullsh*t
Posted: 7/30/2005 9:18:28 PM
So I won't be a hypocrite--I wish it was true. I'd love to see Moslems in the U.S. pull up stakes and move back to whatever country their forebears came from. Then they could concentrate on hating and killing each other and leave us alone.


No need for me to point out your ignorance of your entire post so I'll stick to one point but FYI Islam is not a nationality, it's a religion. Meaning "forebears" could be from anywhere including the U.S. so your wish makes no sense. Neither does the rest of your post but oh well.


Like I said above, I'm still waiting for the legions of young American moslems to join our armed forces to take back their "religion of peace and tolerance" from the terrorists.

If there's been a rush of moslems to the recruiiting stations, it's escaped my notice...

Until there is, as used to be said in the 60's, "if you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem". Moslems who wring their hands but take no action are giving the heretics in their midst tacit support.


You realize this makes absolutley no sense at all, first of all why would "legions" of American moslems suddenly join the armed forces? Most people don't exactly rush to the recruiting stations during wartime. Furthermore there is absolutely no reason why a muslim should have any greater need to join the armed forces than anyone else.
A good person has nothing to prove, its the bad ones that need to repent. Obviously that won't happen.

What exactly are Muslims supposed to do about the problem? If you had half a brain you would realize that the large percentage of terrorist deaths involve the killing of other muslims. You do understand this yes? Very simple concept now you draw the conclusions that come from it.


Ahhh...so again it boils down to the Bush haters...well I tell ya, if it was our country that was bombed by these islamic aholes, I would want some freakin revenge too.


Fortunately you're not a member of parliament (nor will you ever be), meaning that what you would want in that scenario is fairly irrelevant. "Revenge" this isn't an action movie its real life.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 840 (view)
 
Attack on London!
Posted: 7/27/2005 11:37:36 PM
Shooting an innocent person is the right thing?
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 36 (view)
 
House Demagoguery on Iraq
Posted: 7/27/2005 11:35:36 PM

Its also a reflection of neurosis and denial.


Luckily for us great thinkers like Copernicus and Galileo didn't share your ideals.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 32 (view)
 
Two-thirds of Muslims consider leaving UK
Posted: 7/27/2005 11:25:55 PM
If there are so many Muslims, why is there not more of an outcry from the Muslim world of a billion or so, regarding these attacks? A billion? That's a lot of Muslims. The silence is deafening.


You live in Washington, how exactly would you know whether or not there is an outcry from the "muslim world." Assuming that such a united and cohesive thing such as that exists in the first place. The notion of a united muslim world is as ridiculous as a united christian or buddhist world. Or to put it in another way how about that white guy who murdered that other guy, should all white people unleash a great outcry against murder now (feel free to replace white with whatever colour you like, its arbitrary)?

If I was a Muslim I certainly wouldn't feel the need to put on a PR campaign. In fact I'd find the whole notion disconcerting, why would I want to seem apologetic for the mistakes of others? Simply because they share the same faith as me? If I had done nothing wrong in the first place why would I feel the need to repent. On the other hand if I was an extremist who suddenly came to my senses I might then feel the need to preach a message of moderation.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 41 (view)
 
A super clean woman.
Posted: 7/27/2005 11:06:31 PM

I remember back when I was a kid and we got new carpet, shag carpet (hey, it was the '70's), in our living room. My mother would rake it with the carpet rake till it looked perfect. Oh how we would marvel at the precision of her work, but moments later we would sulk, because we were no longer allowed to walk on the carpet. She's an odd bird, that mother of mine.


You can rake a carpet???
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 30 (view)
 
hard to respect women
Posted: 7/27/2005 11:01:28 PM
The stupid person to not so stupid person ratio is about oh I'd say 9 to 1 accross both sexes meaning it would be wise to "find it hard to respect" the majority of people regardless of sex.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 3 (view)
 
No Soul?
Posted: 7/27/2005 10:56:20 PM
White man can't jump, unless he's from BC and his name happens to be Steve Nash.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 838 (view)
 
Attack on London!
Posted: 7/27/2005 10:45:30 PM
Why would North Korea or Iran sell an A Bomb to anyone? Doing so would simply seal their own doom. If either one of them got the bomb do you really think anyone would risk attacking them? Doubtful. Unless they got caught selling one that is....

Theres more of a chance of someone stealing or purchasing a bomb from some Russian mafia or ex kgb than North Korea. Even more likely is some sort of dirty bomb being built out of Russian material than anything else. Look how basic terrorist bombs have been thus far, its not easy to build WMDs or get the materials for that matter.

Political maneuvering, and world unity on a single solution will get us a lot further. For example were the world to ban and destroy all WMDs and also ban the production of WMDs it would be a lot easier to contain the threat. Unfortunately most governments do not have the sense to do so.

It was very interesting how quickly people came to the wrong conclusions and how many people blindly believed that this was a richeous shooting,...

Very few people asked what's the evidence,...


This simply confirms that by in large most people are unintelligent and are easily emotionally manipulated. Furthermore I think a lot of the people who wanted to ask about evidence were scared to speak up because of how the gung ho proponents of violence would react.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 1 (view)
 
No Soul?
Posted: 7/27/2005 10:33:31 PM
This post isn't geared towards any religion in particular, its simply a concept that is universal. One that I struggle with every waking second of the day.

The Soul,that which animates biological matter, the breath of life that brings us consciousness, that which lends substance and humanity behinds ones actions. The vessel through which we proceed unto the gates of heaven, reincarnate into the next life, join the spirits of our ancestors or whatever one believes. The universal concept of the soul entails duality between mind and body, something that remains even after the flesh is destroyed.

Unfortunately because of this duality the soul cannot be observed, other than hocus pocus nobody has even remotely claimed to give scientific validation to the concept. Logic and commonsense dictate that we have no soul, modern science and understanding of diseases that attack brain function would also suggest that the soul is nonexistent. Modern science essentially asserts, with good reason, that we are essentially nothing more than our brains. That we humans and the rest of the animal kingdom are nothing more than flesh and bone.

Its a question I'd like to avoid but unfortunately I'm a philosopher, a thinker, and the notion of having no soul deeply frightens me. Simply because in some finite amount of time I will pass into nothingness, I will cease to exist and my small time in this universe will not even be a spec on the cosmic radar. This depresses me greatly and leads me to the conclusion that on the one hand life is pointless, a mere joke perhaps, on the other hand one could say because our lives are so short that they are all the more precious.

We really have no good reason to believe in souls, how do you smarter people (the non dogmatic ones) rationalize this and the potential consequence that life is meaningless as a result?
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 10 (view)
 
Grappling with so-called Canadian Identity
Posted: 7/24/2005 9:09:20 PM
Maybe others from the Vancouver area can chime in but I haven't seen much of this. Online theres some of the "we are better than you" type thing but in terms of flag waving and such, only once a year on Canada day.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 782 (view)
 
Attack on London!
Posted: 7/24/2005 9:00:39 PM
The more of Bulldogs post I read the more he sounds like an in the closet closet KKK member.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 34 (view)
 
Is Canada the next target?
Posted: 7/24/2005 11:03:26 AM

Where!?? Show me any example of this "western colonial oppression and exploitation" and I will show you that it was MUSLIMS who were the ones implimenting it, setting it up, scheming, conniving, etc.


Okay lets start with Russia in Afghanistan and American support of Osama Bin Laden and the Mujahadeen. After that how about the the creation of a Jewish nation i.e. Israel after World War 2 right on top of Palastine. How about U.S. support of the Shah in Iran. After that the colonial exploits of the British in the entire region and the somewhat arbitrary division of territory.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 11 (view)
 
Is Canada the next target?
Posted: 7/23/2005 11:19:30 PM
It might strengthen relations with the US but change little other than "homeland security."
I think the Canadian government understands that this is not a Military conflict. Who exactly would you propose we attack in retaliation for the hypothetical situation?
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 47 (view)
 
Bin Laden: Dead or Alive, Do We Know?
Posted: 7/23/2005 11:07:21 PM
Scaredy cats.


Those damn wussy Canucks


Frankly I don't think it even matters if he's dead or alive. WWlll has started...one by one the terrorists are hitting the countries on Osama's origonal hit list, and we, Canada, are next.


Meh there would be a lot more casualties if WW3 was going on.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 22 (view)
 
What is Atheism?
Posted: 7/23/2005 4:30:04 PM

We're also born in the nakedness in which we are all equal to the animal kingdom Count, we communicate with emotion and need rather than words, children are also are more sensitive to the energies of the otherworld. I dont belive "New life" should be for any religion to claim. That is sacred ground and not for us to claim domain over...


What is this otherworld you speak of?
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 732 (view)
 
Attack on London!
Posted: 7/23/2005 4:25:43 PM

I'm part pakistani, so I can say "Paki" all I want. Paki, paki, paki. I'm also African, too, Irish(not British)Mary was right, so I am pretty much free to use any epithet I want. Cracker....

Btw, I mean the Indians from India, not the ones who shoot arrows and wear feathers.


Ignorant and American what a surprise.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 728 (view)
 
Attack on London!
Posted: 7/23/2005 4:15:44 PM
I dunno, there's a LOT of Indians and Pakis in the UK, I'd be real surprised if they were innocent. I know you think they're "British" too, but you don't seem to know what that means, so we'll have to agree to disagree, I guess.


Paki is a racist term by the way you ignorant sod, and what do Indians have to do with any of this??

Mary - I had some issues with you in the past but honestly the way you've conducted yourself through this thread has been nothing but first class. You've shown tolerence and compassion during a time when bad things are happening close to home. Unlike guys like Bullmedic who are living in Detroit 1,000s miles away and think they have the answer to everything.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 43 (view)
 
Bin Laden: Dead or Alive, Do We Know?
Posted: 7/23/2005 1:22:15 AM
We don't live in fear down here in the states, we don't wait for people to **** with us, we **** with them first. People who are cowards always run away, like the draft dodgers who fled to Canada. Or muslims who flee to other countries instead of fixing things in their homeland, it's always easier to run...


If you didn't live in fear you wouldn't have invaded iraq, nor would you have "orange alert,"
you also wouldn't have a patriot act, you also wouldn't be searching bags in New York after bombs go off in London if you weren't living in fear. Nice try.

Bin Laden's quite possibly dead because if he did subscribe to the whole martyr concept he would have gone out in a blaze of glory long ago, inciting rage and anger accross the world amoungst his admirers. Makes sense.


Iraq had been ignoring sanctions for how many years? Yeah, I would say that would be enough time for weapons of mass destruction to disappear. And, the end is nowhere in sight, this will go on right through the next presidents term(s), and possibly longer.


Uh you do know that know WMDs where found and that Hans Blix was correct all along, meaning the UN was correct all along. This also means that Sadam was actually complying and dismantling his weapons.

Yes this will go on for many years the 100k casualties in Iraq (plus a few thousand in Afghanistan) and the wholesale destruction of a nation will assure it. Not to mention slaughtering millions of Native North American and the enslavement of Africans. Which of course have nothing to do with this topic but if you believe in Karma its all relevant.
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 33 (view)
 
Canadians are easier to train?
Posted: 7/23/2005 1:15:08 AM
Not sure if anyone mentioned it but GM lost 2 billion dollars in worldwide ops last year, however as it turns out their Canadian division actually made 500 million profit and furthermore GM workers in Canada were deemed much more productive than their cousins down south (hence the profits).
 Eddie1979
Joined: 6/20/2005
Msg: 51 (view)
 
Too pretty for jail?
Posted: 7/23/2005 1:10:06 AM
Hell, if i were a 14 yr old kid, with a teacher like that, I probably would have never told anyone.

But if it were my son, I'd want the judge to throw the book at her.


If he were my son I'd give him a pat on the back, take him out for a brewskie, and say
"son you're no longer a boy you're a man now, well done."
 
Show ALL Forums