Unfortunately I'm in agreement with you chat & forums.

Posted In Forum:

Home

MyForums

Show ALL Forums

Author

Thread: Unfortunately I'm in agreement with you

aindlifgrand

Joined: 2/25/2008

Msg: 119 (view)

Unfortunately I'm in agreement with you Posted: 1/21/2009 8:08:21 AM
I did a two year/500 mile/ long distance relationship. I married "prince charming"; only to find out he was someone I didn't know. People can be on their best behaviour all weekend, and even throughout vacations. If you don't get to see them interacting with family and friends on a regular basis; and don't get a good concept of what they are doing in their lives every day it doesn't matter what you think you know. You don't know enough. Its too easy to make things appear to be something they aren't. Especially when it only has to be presented intermittently. I was not aware that the 75 mile notation restricted contact from those further away; but really if you mean it........why waste anyone's time?

aindlifgrand

Joined: 2/25/2008

Msg: 926 (view)

Why do women date mutiple guys at once? Posted: 1/3/2009 6:52:04 PM
Thank you Essex! Women are starting to play the game the same way men have played it forever. It really gets rather boring to know that the man you are with is treating you as a side dish. We're not stupid. We know when you're waiting for something that looks more like the main course you had in mind. If you want attention you have to pay attention. Too often you guys think you're "all that" ; and just because a woman sees you a time or two its a done deal. If you want something other than the person you are with you should just say so. Men have always been content just to have someone around to keep them happy for the time being, but make no bones about replacing them for something else they think they want more. We are learning !

aindlifgrand

Joined: 2/25/2008

Msg: 508 (view)

for the ladies....can you TRULY say money ain't a factor? Posted: 12/9/2008 10:25:07 PM
You're right Kevin. Security has a large bearing on the level of attraction. Whether it has anything to do with income is another matter. Factories close, businesses fail, technology changes. There are no guarantees where income is concerned. The security factor comes more with trust and dependability don't you think? For example: If a millionnaire is sleeping around with every leggy blonde every time an opportunity pops up...........it doesn't leave his partner feeling very secure. If either partner is abusive, unfair, disinterested, argumentative, unromantic, incommunicado..............etc., etc.,...........the amount of money involved doesn't matter much. Honestly though. As long as he's not spending mine..........its all good! Just kidding of course. LOL

aindlifgrand

Joined: 2/25/2008

Msg: 112 (view)

important circumcision question: not a debate Posted: 10/21/2008 7:13:01 PM
You may request that this not become a debate but it is however inevitable I'm afraid. Circumcision seems to be a practice that's rather cyclic for various reasons and beliefs. At one time in this country (Canada) it was quite a common practice for babies to be circumsized. It is definitely painful for the baby. I've been witness to it. The truth is though that natural birth itself is excrutiatingly painful for the baby; and yet is likely the most beneficial thing for the child. Nothing in this life is easy after all. All children suffer painful experiences in life; either physical, emotional, financial or what have you. What really matters is the support at hand during the stressful periods and the advancement and encouragement offered during critical periods. I would suspect that many young men of your age group have not had the procedure performed as it was approximately 25 years ago that the physicians started insisting that this was not neccessary; and may in fact be detrimental to the development of the child. If this is true I would ask that some trustworthy group lay out the proof in form of studies which prove that young men of your generation are more capable of dealing with the events surrounding them than the young males of perhaps the 1950's. I would like to know if there is in fact more indication today of a lack of coping skills than there were 40 years ago. Its my suspicion that the proof would not be there. I suspect that just as many men have difficulty dealing with the outside stressors; and likely there is more crime, more drug use, more violence in the home, more divorce, etc. etc. etc. This is not to say that circumcision can be related to any of these issues. I guess that's exactly my point. If a man is going to whine and whimper over every little thing he did or didn't have as a child and use that as an excuse to keep him from performing adventagiously then I suggest its his testicles that are lacking; and not his penis. Let me ask you the question. If someone offered you a clean, smooth, rocket shaped appliance with a large entry organ - over a urine and ejaculate encrusted piece of hanging flesh hiding a little red worm.........which one would you pick? (aindlifgrand is not responsible for the opinions posted in this reply) LOL

Show ALL Forums