REGISTER
|
MAIL/PROFILE
|
HELP
|
NOW ONLINE
|
SEARCH
|
RATING
| FORUMS |
SUCCESS STORIES
Posted In Forum:
All Forums
Alabama
Alaska
Alberta
Arizona
Arkansas
Art/Music
Ask A Girl
Ask A Guy
Australia
British Columbia
Broken Hearts
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Dating & Love Advice
Dating Experiences
Dating Sites
Delaware
District Of Columbia
Event Hosts forum
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Health & Fitness
Humor
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Introductions
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Manitoba
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Brunswick
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
Newfoundland
News/Current Events
North Carolina
North Dakota
Nova Scotia
Off Topic
Ohio
Oklahoma
Ontario
Oregon
Over 30
Over 45
Pennsylvania
Plentyoffish Get Togethers
Plentyoffish Site/Suggestions/Help
Poems And Quotes
Politics
Prince Edward Island
Profile Reviews
Quebec
Recipes & Cooking
Relationships
Religion/Supernatural
Rhode Island
Saskatchewan
Science/Philosophy
Sex and Dating
Single Parents
South Carolina
South Dakota
Sports
Stories/creative writing
Technology and computers
Tennessee
Testimonials
Texas
Uk Forums
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Volunteer Moderators Only
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Home
login
MyForums
Show ALL Forums
Author
Thread: Where does it say - in the Bible - that pre-marital sex is restricted?
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
183 (
view
)
Where does it say - in the Bible - that pre-marital sex is restricted?
Posted:
9/10/2009 10:31:42 AM
most dudes have 'no clue' about what the Bible teaches about sexuality!
Are you surprised? People are children in the eyes of God. That goes for men and women. Even Jesus referred to Man as sheep. Without a shepherd, people wander, while thinking that everything is ok, and are ignorant to the consequences that our choices will bring upon us.
Premarital sex is a man made concept, and was made according to man made laws. According to God, Sex is marriage. When you read the bible, understand that Gods laws, and the situations that are presented, were written with the understanding that sex and marriage are the same thing. Sex unites two physical bodies, and the act unites two souls. I don’t care if people think that there is such a thing as no strings attached sex, it does not exist. If you break the sanctity of marriage, that sexual and soulful union, then you are breaking the laws that God has given to us.
Reread the parts of the bible that you think contradicts that concept; it is not there. Better yet, reread the bible with that concept.
I am not deaf. I understand what you are trying to do, and it is a good thing. There are way too many people that are tarnishing their own lives before they even graduate high school, and they blow it off with a live and learn excuse. Some even think that it is beneficial with the ‘what doesn’t kill me makes me stronger’ concept. Those are both copouts that people use to make themselves feel better about them selves. You can lie to yourself, but you cannot lie to God.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
176 (
view
)
Where does it say - in the Bible - that pre-marital sex is restricted?
Posted:
8/25/2009 9:45:12 PM
Perhaps you don't understand what scoundrels the founding fathers actually were.
So you are saying that nothing has really changed. I will agree with that. I am saying that what they did, while attempting to build a foundation of a new country, was procedurally proper, for the most part.
They were Christians, and they did look to the bible for guidance on how to proceed with what they were doing.
If you go into a church today, there are plenty of adulterers, plenty of Sunday morning Christians, liars, cheaters, and rapists that no one prosecuted. Man has not changed. But in that there are some good people, male and female, that do believe in what they know to be true.
As far as polygamy in the bible, I think that a man can have more than one wife, but I would not recommend it. If the population were 7 women to 1 man, it would be understandable. David had something like 200 wives, but punished for his affair with Bathsheba. Overall, I believe that it was meant to be one man with one woman.
As far as all men being created equal, I don’t believe that all men are, so I am not going to argue against it being a lie.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
174 (
view
)
Where does it say - in the Bible - that pre-marital sex is restricted?
Posted:
8/24/2009 4:41:49 PM
No...NO... and DOUBLE-KNOW, ...this was never a Christian country *IF* you devotedly study the documents!
Yes…YES…. And Yeppers. Most of the original documents created by the original folk of the United States do refer to thanks to and guidance from God. Read them, there are plenty of them.
The biggest problem that the founding fathers dealt with was creating a nation that was not led by one sect of Christianity. i.e. the separation of church and state, meant to declare that no one Christian church should claim governmental authority over the others.
If fact, while writing the original papers, they looked to the bible first, that way they could create a Christian nation without the religious authority that England and most of Europe had. It was a long process and there was a lot of debate, but I think that they did rather well.
The Treaty of Tripoli was not written by our government, or in english, in fact, it was already set in place before it reached congress, and it was working. It is not sufficient evidence, for or against, our nations values. You have been listening to obama, a muslim, a politician, and a man who has proven himself a liar and a failure in office. He is not what this country stands for.
... and that evidence keeps this topic in many people's mind as many want to do the right thing!
The right thing is to control your sexual drive, and not let it control you. God intended a lifelong one man one woman bond. The two becoming one, and how you treat the other is how you treat yourself.
And if you do remember, David was punished for his affair with Bathsheba.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
172 (
view
)
Where does it say - in the Bible - that pre-marital sex is restricted?
Posted:
8/23/2009 7:04:13 PM
As the USA is NOT a Christian country when it comes to sexuality most of the time when one meets a suitor you do not nessasarily know where they are coming from!
This is still a Christian country. We have turned from God. We have taken God out of our basis for law, we have taken God out of our basis for school, and we have taken God out of our basis for marriage.
As far as suitors go, don’t have sex until you do know where they are coming from.
I believe that being a Christian comes from within. We as individuals must take responsibility for our own decisions.
Look at sex as marriage, and govern your pre and post decision making based on that concept. That way you wont have to worry about premarital.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
169 (
view
)
Where does it say - in the Bible - that pre-marital sex is restricted?
Posted:
8/20/2009 10:21:35 AM
In the old testament, a man having sex with a woman makes that woman his wife. The laws in Deuteronomy 22 and 24 are based off of that way of thinking.
Our thoughts on premarital sex are not based on that. The current society bases marriage on the legal system. That is where we get the concept of ‘premarital sex’; which is not biblical.
I agree with the bible. If a man takes a woman and does not keep her as his wife, he has made her unclean, and he will suffer the consequences of that sin.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
51 (
view
)
What are the odds...really?? REALLY????
Posted:
7/9/2009 9:29:21 PM
And then there are paragraphs. Seriously. Ordered even. My eyes lost focus.
Enough about your profile. Who is up for the funky chicken dance?
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
168 (
view
)
Monogomy is it important anymore?
Posted:
8/3/2008 10:32:48 AM
The human race was not started by two individuals. Evolutionary biology tells us that groups evolve together, so there couldn't have been an "Adam and Eve."
You cannot use one to really justify the other.
Cain was banished to the land of Nod after murdering Abel. He produced a family (and joined an already existing community).
It does not say that there was an already existing community there.
Additionally, the only other offspring of Adam and Eve was another son, Seth. He also got a wife from somewhere other than Nod.
Those are the only ones mentioned in Genesis, but it does not say that those three were the only ones.
Monogamy wasn't popular in the old testament. Abraham having one concubine is hardly the best example of this. Nor is Lot.
Exactly. I thought that I had stated that. Msg:165 - Because there are times where monogamy is not the way, but it is not with Adam or Noah.
a brother was supposed to marry his brother's widow.
But it does not say that the brother is already married when he marries his brother’s widow.
The point about incest not being so damaging is actually a pretty compelling one. It's actually more of a social taboo than a naturally occurring "bad thing." There are groups that have done studies showing that sex with first cousins actually isn't terrible. On a genetic level. I don't want to know if they tested it on any other levels.
I agree. I think that the genetic pool thing is a bit overused. My posts were about monogamy, not about incest, and how phule was merging the two in order to make his argument.
God is actually pretty inconsistent on the whole "monogamy" thing... … but there is alot of conflicting material on the subject.
God and Jesus are not inconsistent on it. The people are. God gave man the ability to choose and will let man fail if that is what man chooses.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
164 (
view
)
Monogomy is it important anymore?
Posted:
8/2/2008 7:31:41 PM
Poorest Argument? Ok. It starts off with two people... and their children. Then where does it go? Nono, I want YOU to detail out how it would work. Who has sex with who, etc, to produce the widest gene pool.
Ok, two people, no choice about monogamy. I already detailed how the story reads. Or do you think that a ‘gene pool’ existed at the time? I did mention that the logical deduction was that Adams sons would only have their sisters to choose for wives, or did you not read that part. Or are you like most people and are making shit up just to suit your own determination. You knocked on the bible, read it and then tell me where it talks about monogamy or lack there of. Because there are times where monogamy is not the way, but it is not with Adam or Noah.
Then get rid of all that data, with the Great Flood, and do it all again, but with Noah's family.
I did that. You may have missed that part, so here it is again.
Translation Msg 157: What does that have to do with Monogamy? That would maybe be another incest argument, but then you have to look who was on the ark. There was Noah, his wife, his sons, and their wives and children. So there would be the assumption about Noah’s grandchildren only being able to take a cousin. But there is nothing about not being monogamous.
Was that not clear?
There has to be partner swapping going on. There has to be parents having sex with their kids, and siblings involved with each other, in order to REPOPULATE THE FREAKING PLANET!
Why? And where does it even come close to mentioning that? The men had wives, that is where new babies come from, that is how there is population growth.
Any belief that a family could do it by taking their time and just producing kids down the tree, without having to cross onto other family members is just foolish. Any belief that just one couple could do it, without say Adam producing children by one of his daughters or Eve producing children with one of her sons, is foolish. Else there would not be the genetic variety we currently have.
Have you ever studied Genetics? I have. And let me tell you, because you obviously don’t know. There are more Genetic variances within a local population, i.e. a town or city, then there are cross culturally. How does that show our genetic variety? Plus, since the understanding of genetics was not readily available at the time, I highly doubt that it was one of their primary concerns.
So yes, I have thought this out. I've gotta think that you haven't...
I am waiting for your own thoughts. I would love to hear them. Seeing that I do study science in great detail, none of the ideas that you have stated are uncommon knowledge in the scientific field. If, today, we needed to repopulate with as much diversity as possible, and only had a small handful of folks to work with, then yes, it would be good for each woman to have a few children from each man. But that is not the case, it is only an if situation, and the only reason behind it is genetic diversity, something that Adam and Noah didn’t seem to be worried about, since they each had their own wives to repopulate their own families, which is how it was back then.
and you put too much stock in that bible of yours.
Your argument was about the bible and vixens belief system. I can only tell you about the bible and I will let vixen share her belief system if she so chooses.
You are arguing something that is not stated in the bible. So therefore it is only your assumption on the matter. Which means that your argument is only about how you feel; you do not have any credible evidence, none, so you don’t even have enough to make an opinion on the matter, just your feelings on the matter, your assumptions.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
754 (
view
)
q for the guys--Tattoos on women--yes or no?
Posted:
8/2/2008 2:09:05 PM
Ok,,,,then what about Kat Von D???? She's beautiful and talented and feminine,,,not that im anyway near her but my point is shes hot!!!!!
I just looked her up on google images and no. That would be your personal viewpoint, because I didn’t see beauty there. Maybe without the tattoos she would be somewhat attractive, but I got a huge sense of repulsion at seeing her. The artwork is neat, but not on a person, so no, not hot.
She may be a nice person, but I wouldn’t want to look at her for any length of time. And I certainly wouldn’t want to date a woman that I didn’t want to look at.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
156 (
view
)
Monogomy is it important anymore?
Posted:
8/2/2008 12:10:54 PM
if you believe that Adam and Eve started off the whole race... how do you think this was accomplished with monogamy?
If there were only two people to start it off, then how do you think that that was not monogamous? That is about the poorest argument that I have ever heard.
For that matter, how do you think this was accomplished without incest?
The bible doesn’t say. There is only assumption that the sons would only be able to take a sister.
But we can let that slide, because God wiped everyone out aside from Noah's family, with the great flood... so this time Noah and his family had to repopulate the planet. How do you think THIS was accomplished with Monogamy? Again, how do you think this was accomplished without incest.
What does that have to do with Monogamy? That would maybe be another incest argument, but then you have to look who was on the ark. There was Noah, his wife, his sons, and their wives and children. So there would be the assumption about Noah’s grandchildren only being able to take a cousin. But there is nothing about not being monogamous.
So before you bring God into it, take a good long look at the people he apparently chose to populate the species, and the tools he gave them to work with. You will find that Monogamy is not one of those tools. Sure, we added it into the whole marriage vow thing... but THAT didn't come from God.
Did you really think this through when you wrote this? If so then you chose the wrong people. Maybe you should touch up on the bible yourself. Nowhere does it indicate that Adam or his sons were not monogamous. Nowhere does it indicate that Noah or his sons were not monogamous.
If you really wanted to go non monogamous then you should have chosen those that are indicated by that. Abraham had a wife that chose another woman for him, to produce an heir, but the bible doesn’t indicate that it was more than the once; it does not indicate that it was for reasons of pleasure. If anything, it indicates to me that it was out of the norm, and that monogamy was strongly valued.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
149 (
view
)
Monogomy is it important anymore?
Posted:
8/2/2008 10:06:10 AM
Although people have tried to defy God's will and create religions acceptable to poligamy and rude sex. It alwayst runs out that the society is barbaric and crumbles.
Yes. Or he destroys all the people. Washed away or burned to the ground leaving no trace that they were ever there, wiped from the face of the earth.
Jesus is good to reconcile for you, but when God steps in it is usually too late for redemption.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
143 (
view
)
Monogamy is it important anymore?
Posted:
8/1/2008 10:33:13 PM
Monogamy is it important anymore?
Yes.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
171 (
view
)
Ladies, how many of you ask guys out on first meet or date?
Posted:
8/1/2008 8:36:20 PM
I made it VERY clear that I was interested.
Good deal! I agree with DJChickie, a man will respond if interested.
But just to note – People usually need time to think things over.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
329 (
view
)
m church
Posted:
8/1/2008 1:00:05 PM
I take it that you are a Christian. since you stated that Jesus is your friend. Do you know what that means? It means that you should model yourself after Christ, to become the example.
To become the example? Absolutely. Do you think that I have the authority to forgive you? I do not. That is for Jesus. Where do I become the example? That is only for you to decide.
You have yet to address this very simple truth, that people make mistakes. You also failed to address my comment about loving someone enough to not want to hurt them which was my entire point from the beginning, that you missed because you were too busy looking to attack someone out of unresolved anger and bitterness at the woman and/or women in your past..
You have got to be kidding. First off, Mistakes? Are you talking about an ‘Oops I accidentally had sex with someone else.’ Is that really a forgivable act? I think not, but go ask Jesus what his thoughts are.
Not wanting to hurt someone else? Ok, then don’t cheat on them. A cheater is a coward. Lying only compounds the hurt on that someone else. I will lead by example, I don’t cheat, never have, never even had the desire to. And no, I am not angry or bitter. I am fine with the women in my past.
Whether I enjoyed the things that I did or not is irrelevant, I have never enjoyed hurting other people.
Then why cheat on them? It is relevant. Maybe you don’t see the pain that you cause others, because when someone cheats, there is always someone that knows, and there is always someone that feels pain from it. If you think that it is a cute little secret, then you are fooling yourself. Someone somewhere paid for your pleasure with their pain. So yes, it is very relevant.
Yet you want to say that forgiveness has nothing to do with love? It has everything to do with love. Without love, there would be no need for forgiveness. What would be the point?
Love does not equal forgiveness. You are looking at love from a victim’s mentality. Love is what is best for the other person. Forgiveness is not what is best for the other person. If you are seeking forgiveness then you hurt that person. That would not be love on your part. So you lie to that person, or hide the truth. That is not love on your part. If you love a person then don’t cause them pain from the beginning. That is called responsibility. Honor and integrity are the most admirable traits in a human being, but are the hardest to earn. If you want love then be responsible for and to that love. Lying and cheating are not lovable qualities.
I'm done discussing this with you. This visit to your world of black and white has worn thin my patience.
How poetic. Not many can handle my world, which is a shame, because it is more colorful than you could ever imagine. I am sorry that you cannot see that, because it is much better than your blissful ignorance, as you stated in Msg:321.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
326 (
view
)
Will this fix itself?
Posted:
8/1/2008 11:27:55 AM
I've never once promoted lying or betraying anyone nor do I condone it.
Do you not think that cheating on someone is lying and betraying? Or maybe you see cheating and faithfulness as two separate entities. You say that you have done it and enjoyed it, and you say to not tell your SO about it. That is lying and betrayal. How do you now say that you do not condone it?
But you, you are bitter and and angry in your heart which seems to lack very important elements of love.
I do know what love is. I am not bitter or angry in my heart. I am a good and loving man, though you may choose to disagree if you like.
the elements of understanding and forgiveness.
Understanding and forgiveness is love? No, I think not. I am an understanding person, but I also hold people accountable for their actions. Forgiveness is not love. It has nothing to do with love. If you want forgiveness then go talk with Jesus, that is his field. Jesus is a friend, but I am not Jesus. I only believe it forgiveness through true redemption, and in a relationship, to me, that means to go be a better person somewhere else. I want nothing to do with beggars and pity.
I would advise you to take some time to heal before getting into another relationship.
Thanks, but what am I to heal from? What do you think that my ailment is? Anger? Bitterness? I don’t think so.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
17 (
view
)
I keep setting myself up to get my heart broken.
Posted:
8/1/2008 10:04:39 AM
It is a general rule of thumb that if you want a long term loving relationship, then do not date for the first year after your last relationship.
Good men stay away from women that are having sex with other men. You may be the reason that the Keepers are staying away from you.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
324 (
view
)
Will this fix itself?
Posted:
8/1/2008 9:41:12 AM
Free thinking outside the norm obviously scares the hell out of you.
Is that what you call free thinking? I don’t think so. Lying? Betrayal? That is a sickness.
I know, I have experienced each with and without the other and have been not been traumatized by any of my experiences. In fact, I have enjoyed them all as they were all unique.
I made the statement that you do not know the pain caused by others. Has anyone done these things to you? Has your SO known about these things? Did it cause them pain?
How do you identify love? Is it all about how you feel? Or is it because you care about the others well being? I see you as a selfish little tart, and I would want nothing to do with you. Your vision of love is not even close to mine. I see you as a betrayer of love.
I do find it interesting however how you automatically assume that someone with a different has been traumatized.
Where did I assume? I stated that most, from women that I know. There is not assumption there, that was fact. The others were like you and could not see anything beyond their own personal pleasure. Do you even care if you cause pain to others?
How can I love someone and be unfaithful? Firstly, the redflag comment came long before I posted that so don't even try it..
OK, here is what I posted the original to.
excerpt from Msg:316 - especially, especially not if you cheated while together.
That is the red flag. Unfaithful. No faith. Not love. Maybe in your thoughts, but not mine.
I've had animal like attractions, physical attractions to other people while being in love with someone else.
Then you did wrong towards yourself and the person that you love. Be an animal if you want to. There have been women that loved me yet had sex with someone else. They disgust me. They are not wanted by me. Even if I love them, I do not want them in my life. So they are not a part of my life. I have no respect for them and am glad that they are elsewhere.
It doesn't mean I love anyless, it just means that I am human. I make no claims of perfection to anyone.
Maybe to you. Not to me. It sounds like a cheap excuse. How many criminals have used that same excuse?
I bet you've never told a lie in your life to some one you love or withheld information from anyone for any reason. To me, that is a red flag. I guess we are even now. Good day!
Being honest is a red flag? That to me is a sick and twisted dementia.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
321 (
view
)
Will this fix itself?
Posted:
8/1/2008 8:09:52 AM
You probably like the idea of the scarlet letter too.
A scarlet letter and a red flag are two different things. Though a scarlet letter would be a red flag, a red flag is a reason to not date someone. A scarlet letter would say that you are an adulterer.
And trust issues are not a good thing to have. They will interfere with all of your furture relationships and you will continue to blame your ex, regardless of whether she told you or not, whether she lied about it or not because she cheated.
No, they will not interfere with my future relations. What would interfere with my future relations would be lies and cheating.
Sex and love are two separate things.
Danger Will Robinson, Danger. lol That is about the biggest red flag that there is, in my book. Do you naturally think that way or have you learned to think that way? I have met many women that think this way and I steer well clear of them. Most that I have met that think this way have had a sexual trauma in their past and it was their only way to cope with it; which is understandable, but not acceptable to me. It is not about the past trauma, it is about how it is dealt with.
I know I can love someone and be unfaithful.
That is where my original post about your red flag came from. How could you do that? Why would you do that?
There are a lot of people that are emotionally and mentally unfaithful, that fantasize about others. Should we reveal those fantasies too? No, because they would hurt. Honesty is not always the best policy and I honestly don't think you have given any real thought to why it isn't or you might agree..
Yes, I believe that the fantasies should be revealed, and talked about. It is better that then having them be acted upon, to be cheated on.
Honesty, to me, is the best policy. In my opinion, if it is that bad, then ending the relationship would be best for both.
I have given plenty of real thought to this. I give real thought to most everything that I do. And no, I would never agree to cheating or lies. I would rather be alone. Not that I want to be alone, but it would be better than being with a woman that I could not respect. I don’t even make friends with people that I do not respect, so why would I do that with a woman that is supposed to be my priority in life?
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
283 (
view
)
How old is too old?
Posted:
8/1/2008 7:42:36 AM
And a guy seeming sex oriented? Oh wow! what a crime! Round them all up and shoot them!
I don’t know anyone who is not having sex, that doesn’t have sex as one of their wants. If a person has sex on a regular basis, then sex is not such a main topic, usually.
When I think of a woman that I might want a relationship with, the want for sex is part of the equation.
If it were not, then it would be a friends only situation.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
319 (
view
)
Will this fix itself?
Posted:
8/1/2008 6:58:12 AM
Why? Because I don't agree with your view?
Yes. That is my opinion and my view. In my experiences the truth always shows up. I would rather hear the truth than be with someone that would lie to me. And yes, it is my opinion that keeping secrets is lying. Would you want a man that gave you a false reality? Ignorance is not bliss. I hate being ignorant and I do my best to not be.
Why don't you and the others explain to me why sucking the wind from someone else's sails in the name of honesty is a better policy?
It is an old saying, ‘Honesty is the best policy.’ I didn’t make it up, someone else did, and I do like it.
Knowing who your ex screwed while you were broke up serves what useful purpose?
For me it would help identify the mentality of the ex. And no, I would not have taken her back. But, it would be better to find the truth up front, from the ex, than it would to find out down the road. I would leave. In fact it would be more reason to leave. Yes I have trust issues. And no, I don’t think that that is a bad thing.
Do you really believe that your SO telling you first is going to make the pain less painful?
Yes. Proof of honesty. Increases credibility. It is the only thing that would sway my opinion to continue seeing that person.
Imagine that this person is the main person in your life. The most important above all others. To hear about that persons escapades from external sources would be devastating. The ability to trust this one person would be shot hell.
I know what it is like to be cheated on and trust me, I could have lived without ever knowing because once I knew, I started second guessing a lot of things and it forever altered my view about relationships. I questioned my own self worth needlessly when it had nothing to do with me.
Exactly. Credibility was shot. Better to move on.
As for people finding out later about the other sex that you had well if you didn't crap where you ate it wouldn't be a problem.
Agreed.
I personally can respect some lies faster than I can the truth. But then again, I am not your average, everyday girl thinking inside a stupid box built by the so called moral majority either.
Then why would you rather be ignorant? Holding the truth to better a situation is a lie. You not knowing the truth would be being lied to.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
315 (
view
)
Will this fix itself?
Posted:
7/31/2008 11:34:33 PM
If you really, really want to hurt someone that you love, lie to them and let them find out later, about the other sex you had....
No kidding. I have been holding myself back for about an hour since I read allno’s post. Yikes. Someone should stamp a red flag onto her forehead for everyone to see.
Maybe she doesn’t know about pain caused by others.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
219 (
view
)
Abusive men, why do we forgive and go back? Please help.
Posted:
7/31/2008 11:12:45 PM
She said, Ok Ron, here's the big secret.
It was a secret. She knew that it was wrong. She should have told you in the beginning. That was her wrong doing towards you. I guarantee you that you grabbing her is not what scares her. What scares her is that now you know and you do not approve. What scares her is that she is now lesser in your mind. She knows deep down that it was wrong, even while she keeps trying to convince herself that it was spiritual.
Evil does exist, and now you have seen it first hand. You are not the one that needs help, she is the one that needs help. Pray for her. Pray that one day she will be able to conquer her own demons, because they are there, and they are for her to battle. Pray that god gives her the strength, and ability, to do it.
I have lived in HELL ever sence… …She is always on my mind.
That is natural. You are blaming yourself. You are thinking that the reason that all of this happened is because you grabbed her. That is not true. It should not have been done, but it is not the reason. You have the natural instinct to help her, but you cannot, which means that you know have demons of your own. That is why I say that you have to let go. Pray for her, but let go for her. Let go of your want to help her and cast your love for her into the wind. I know that that sounds heartless, but it is what is best. You will always love her, but you have to stop holding onto that love.
If you do not, then it will tear you up from the inside out. Literally. Physically. The pain will tear at your soul.
Do not ask for her back. That would be wrong for you and for her.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
48 (
view
)
What is with MOTHERS
Posted:
7/31/2008 10:19:34 AM
No matter what they are coming with issues and I dont know how to make a decision.
Then don’t. I am serious. You should wait until you are ready. It is obvious to me that you are not ready for this. Stay single. You do not need this in your life right now and any decision that you make will be one that you regret down the road.
Take time and build on your own character. This is not about choices, this is about your current mindset, I have seen it before, and you are close to making a mistake no matter what you choose.
Remove yourself from the whole situation. Stop dating all of them. Don’t look to date. Build your own mind and gain strength inside of yourself. Dating right now will only increase your weakness, which will make it harder for you to gain strength down the road. Be smart now.
Note – I am not saying that you are weak, it is a mindset thing and if you don’t understand it now, you will. So focus on your independence.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
275 (
view
)
How old is too old?
Posted:
7/31/2008 9:56:13 AM
Besides, it might not be only me that think this way.
Might? It is not only you. Could you imagine that you were seeking advice on dating someone, and with knowing absolutely nothing of the other person other than there age, the counselor called them a sexual predator for even wanting to date you? And then blamed it on this Sad, f..cuked up sick patriarchy.
A counselor that has a set way of thinking and applies that way of thinking onto every situation encountered does not benefit those that are not in the exact same situation. I think that if the OP had gone to see cape then the OP would come out worse than when she had gone in; having been given the idea that thirty year old men are no good and would only use her.
There is a huge difference in cautioning about the possibilities of being used and saying that any 30yo that is interested in an 18yo is up to no good.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
261 (
view
)
How old is too old?
Posted:
7/29/2008 5:31:02 PM
He's too old if he doesn't encourage and support your dreams.. oh wait that's just being an ***hole. there's no age for that.
Ha haha, that was awesome. I needed a good laugh.
he's too old if he's over 5 years older than you and you are a virgin.
I don’t get this one. If it is two people forming a long term relationship, then why would you say this? Would you expect her to go lose her virginity to another man an then date the man that she wants to? I don’t know about you, but I would turn away from her if she did that to me. That would be a personal insult and a stab straight to the heart.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
212 (
view
)
Abusive men, why do we forgive and go back? Please help.
Posted:
7/29/2008 5:24:11 PM
she'd say Ron, you want to make it dirty when it was a spritual thing going on there.
Ron, your story is a sad one. I personally don’t care what she may have thought it was about, I see it as pure evil. Why do you think that you reacted the way you did? I wouldn’t have grabbed her, but I certainly would have ended the relationship. It doesn’t matter if it were an orgy thing or not, it was dirty. Don’t get me wrong, I think that the female body is a beautiful thing. Nudism and ‘free spiritedness’ is not godly and certainly not spiritual. It destroys ones soul, it is an open door for the devil to move in and take the reins, so to speak. Even if you don’t believe in God or the devil, it is mindfully weak.
I am not surprised that you reacted the way that you did; most good men would feel disgusted by that behavior, though getting physical is not acceptable.
I know that you probably don’t want to let go, but it would be best for youself. Else it will eat you up inside. That is the devil at work. I hope that you can deal with it and let it go and mend yourself inside. You were ‘stabbed’ by satan through her, so ask God for help.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
258 (
view
)
How old is too old?
Posted:
7/29/2008 10:00:43 AM
translation..You didnt even answer the question about poof on moral adult development.
Could you be a little more specific on that question? Moral adult development? Are we talking ethics here?
Are you asking about Kohlberg’s six moral stages?
Translation Msg:263 - Or are you basing it on stages of development? You say that everyone is the same on this? Not true. Do you really want me to break out my books and prove to you that not everyone goes through the same stages? Or that some people don’t even get to the adult developmental stages? Because if you really want to go into that, I am very capable in that area.
On Kohlberg’s stages, there are no exact age brackets. This is because it is not based on the physical maturation, it is about standards of behavior. Some people never get past stage two. Sad, but true.
I already know the general stages of human development..DUH.
Then why did you say that an 18 yo is not an adult?
You never expounded on why you think an 18 yr old is developmentally ready to have a long term serious relationship with a 30 yr old.
Because most 18yo’s are capable of thinking for themselves. Most do have the cognitive reasoning required to make decisions for themselves.
If we were to base our decisions on a person’s naivety or inexperience, then what is the point of being an adult at all? No one has experience in everything. We all start life somewhere. An 18yo is an adult and has the ability to choose for themselves.
An 18 yr old is also a teen..You never answered to THAT....Id like scientific proof of that please based on research.
I did say that an 18yo is a teen and an adult. What is the THAT that I did not answer? What scientific proof are you looking for?
Im sure you dont have it..Which proves Im right all along ..Give it up..You cant handle the truth.
Have you asked yourself what developmental stage you are in? You assume that I can’t prove something, and that means that you are right? Right about what? That eighteen is teen? That would be grammatically and mathematically correct. An 18yo is an adult, yes. So is a 19yo, and by some psychologists, a 17yo is also an adult. Legally in most of the countries that I know of, 18 is an adult, many, 16 is an adult. So what exactly is it that you are wanting scientific proof on?
As far as truth goes, that is what I look for. That is what I enjoy. I think that maybe you have watched one too many movies. Are we role playing now? You are Jessep and I am Kaffee. A Few Good Men is a good movie, but is this really the place for that?
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
249 (
view
)
How old is too old?
Posted:
7/28/2008 9:06:45 PM
Ditto for your lack of stats and resources and research regarding developmental growth of people. Sounds like your opinions about adult development dont make you correct about it at all....You said you had "books" and such to back up what you said....Where are they???
I did say stand by. It so happens that I do have a life outside of POF. I have been busy prepping for my calc test today, even though it was supposed to be last Thursday, but was delayed till today. Ok, my books.
Human Development by Diessner and Tiegs
Psychology by Myers
The development of children by Cole, Cole, and lightfoot.
And yes, these are college course books. So, I have been spending some time reviewing them. This is one little tidbit that I found.
Daniel J. Levinson
Early adulthood is 17 – 40
Middle adulthood is 40 – 60
Late adulthood is 60 on
So, you were saying that 18 is not an adult?
..Now you are just backsliding into opinions only..Looks like Im very correct about developmental growth occuring across the adult life span, since Im the only one bringing any kind of proof here both professionally and academically....Atl least I back up what I assert here about teens......Typical that you cant handle that because you simply dont want to...
Why, aren’t we getting all high and mighty about ourselves. I will believe what the psychologists are saying over what you say anyday. And yes, my opinion is a valid one, I do have life experiences to go off of, and I put credibility in my reasoning. Where is yours?
Do you realize how foolish you are? You are like a child throwing a tantrum. Instead of saying “Hey, I was a bit emotional when I made that post on Msg:63, all the memories of what horrible things can happen came flashing into my mind and I vented through that post.”
But no, you have to dodge every question that comes your way in an attempt to save your face value. And then you slander others when they confront you about your post. If you want credibility then quote the person and then state your opinion, that way it would not be slander. Both I and Nordic have both requested you to do this.
Do you say things at work without giving validation? Because that would be a very poor work ethic; the same applies here.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
245 (
view
)
How old is too old?
Posted:
7/28/2008 10:25:12 AM
translation...Still looking in your post for the word" friendship" coupled with 30 yr old man and 18 yr old woman.
Why?
Most want sex and/or often a long term relationships with her...THATS what Ive seen.
Isn’t that what most people are looking for? I know that I am. Do you think that maybe, by chance, an 18yo is also looking for sex and a long term relationship?
The vast majority of 30 yr old men who want ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS with teenagers are emotionally immature.
I get what you are trying to say, I do, really, but most people that I know, once you get through the tough exterior, are equally emotionally sensitive. That is not really something that changes with time. What does change with time is the exterior.
So please, tell me, how do you determine if someone is emotionally immature?
I said nothing about friendships.....This is the second time Ive said that...Hope you get it right this time, it really not that complicated.
Where did this friendship thing come in? Who was talking about friendship?
I also NEVER said it was the OP who was sacrificing her youth.
BS. BS. And more BS. Are you totally screwed up upstairs? Did I not quote you? Did you not read what you yourself wrote? WTF??? Talk about creating a false reality for oneself. Holy crap!
Meanwhile you twisted what I said out of context, quoting me out of context, to fit your persona of me and continued on some stupid tirade of lies.
Can you not come up with something better? Was I not the one calling you a liar? Did you have nothing on your own so you are calling me the same thing that I called you? You have got to be kidding. Does that fit in with your emotional immaturity?
I was saying LETS move on here and agree to disagree.
If that is all you can come up with, then it is ok by me.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
35 (
view
)
Would you obey rules of love?
Posted:
7/27/2008 11:45:51 PM
Ha haha, I think that is pretty friggin awesome!!! Why were you so put off? She came prepared with what was in her best interest. I think that that is very credible.
Why did you think that she wanted intimacy? Were you hoping for sex and instead you got a list? Can you not handle a woman that puts thought into what she is expecting?
I would see it as her way of maintaining her own security. Plus, don’t you think that it would alleviate some of the awkwardness of what might be expected during a date?
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
240 (
view
)
How old is too old?
Posted:
7/27/2008 10:17:17 PM
Msg:63 - Amazing here about many people think its okay for a teen girl to sacrifice her youth and the rest of her childhood to fullfill the wishes and wants of an immature man almost twice her age....It is indeed still a mans world where a girl cant even grow up yet without immediately be expected to latch onto a man as a couple before shes even grown..Sad, f..cuked up sick patriarchy...
capegardengirl - Did you read this? I take that as a yes. OK. Would you like to explain it in detail? I don’t think that I am the only one wondering where you are coming from with this. You say that I am twisting by making false inferences. Well, then please explain and give quotes as so we can all understand you better.
Who said that she is sacrificing anything?
How did you come to the conclusion that this man was immature?
Who is expecting a girl to latch onto a man?
Have I not asked you these questions before? Maybe when I was looking for clarification? Maybe these are some of the questions that I say that you never answered? OH, yes, yes, and yes. Oh look, here it is, a quote from myself of Msg:67
Hold the phone capegardengirl, you need another vacation. Why is it sacrificing her youth? Where it the hell did you get the idea that the man was immature? Where in the hell did you get the idea that she is doing it to fulfill his wishes? Where did you read that anyone was expecting anything from her, let alone to Latch onto a man? Where did you read that? Honestly, I want you to show me. Pick out the post, give me the number. I want you to find anything that the OP has said that justifies one single assumption that you have stated.
You have issues. You have a lot of issues. Bunches. Lots. Many. Holycrap. Issues.
So please forgive my twisting, but what is anyone to think when you failed to explain your own posts. I will “Get it right” once you explain yourself.
Please stand by while I break out my books.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
175 (
view
)
Time to come clean: What keeps you from meeting someone?
Posted:
7/27/2008 6:17:46 PM
I've recently come to realize that women generally aren't going to bite, scratch, hit, or otherwise injure me on a "first meet.".
Oh no, not on a first meet. They save that stuff for when you are not looking.
Ha haha.
BTW, what’s a henweigh?
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
21 (
view
)
What is it?
Posted:
7/27/2008 12:40:15 PM
I would say don’t make an issue out of it. Just be you and live your life.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
118 (
view
)
Open relationships all around?
Posted:
7/27/2008 12:29:49 PM
How ever I think not all people are bad, and still believe you cannot judge them until they have done you wrong.
Maybe not all people, but a great many. I do judge. I will not wait for someone to do me wrong, I will call them for what they are and not let a wrongness towards me happen. I am not a bible thumper, but I know a sickness when I see one, and I see sexual promiscuity as a sickness. People can try and justify it all they want, I will still judge them.
Where is my guilty stamp? Oh, there it is. WHAM guilty as charged, off with you now, remove yourself from my sight, you have lost yourself from my graces, you have failed and are no longer wanted by me.
What? Was that too much? A little overboard? Nah
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
18 (
view
)
What is it?
Posted:
7/27/2008 11:44:07 AM
But i dont know what it is.
That is not a bad thing. Work on other things in life. I do understand how you feel towards your parents and it is not a bad thing, I see it as a way to distance oneself in order to be oneself. Parents have a way of not letting go, but it is a bit of human nature to break from the den and venture for ourselves.
Don’t worry about love, it will happen when it happens. I know that sounds vague and sounds like a load of crap and not even helpful, but it does not help to try for something that you are not ready for. Love doesn’t work very well if you try to force it.
I know what love is, even while I do not feel it. I know that I will feel it, when it happens.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
235 (
view
)
How old is too old?
Posted:
7/27/2008 10:14:42 AM
Ritawayward - A person of any age can make the choice to NOT repeat bad experiences by NOT doing the same thing the same way, if the results are undesirable.
That is true. I was not saying that you were wrong, I was saying that I don’t think that way. What you described, to me, is more like a set of rules to follow. That is something that I totally understand. But, when I think of smarts and being smart, I would look at it more as the natural ability to avoid said situations, instead of learning from them.
If you have bad experiences, you make a new rule, ‘don’t do that again’. At the least I would hope that a person would do this.
If a person is smart, then they would avoid that experience before it happens. They would have the ability to figure things out before making a decision to do, or not do, something.
My example on smarts was calculus. I used to be better and quicker at figuring things out. Even though I know more now, I used to be smarter. Learning never ends for any of us. Maybe it is that the quantity of variables are increasing exponentially and I am just as smart as before, or even more so, but then I also realize that the things to learn never ends, so it takes longer to process new information.
Psychology speaking, my state of disequilibrium is growing as I sort new information into known or new schema. It is taking longer because my network of schemas are getting exponentially more complex.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
234 (
view
)
How old is too old?
Posted:
7/27/2008 9:50:04 AM
capegardengirl - That says more about your control issues and need to be right than anything else..No wonder you want a young girl who wont challenge your authority.
Do I have control issues? Are you insinuating that I have authority? I tell you what, the only people that have given me the authority to make decisions for them are the people that have gotten to know me and trust my decisions. But, also knowing me, they know that I encourage them to make decisions for themselves. More often than not, for the people that know me, they come to me for thoughts, things to think about, so that they can make better decisions for themselves. The only time that I allow myself to decide for others is if that person is entirely over their head and cannot fathom one way or the other, and in cases like that, I only do as much as necessary to get them to a point to take control.
There is a huge problem with deciding for others, and it is not about taking the responsibility for that decision, it is that when one person decides for another, the person that is ‘decided for’ starts wanting the deciding person to keep deciding. So that deciding person turns into a babysitter and the ‘decided for’s persons life is less complicated. What a royal pain in the ass.
So no, I do not want any woman to challenge my authority, I would rather that she have her own. But in any relationship, a two way street, times of strength and weakness for each, the trust of the other to make good decisions is giving them authority. To give that authority and then challenge that authority is just rude, don’t you think?
In fact, about 90% of women come to me regarding relationship problems.
Who, of any age, doesn’t have relationship problems? Really now, that has nothing to do with age.
EVERYONE goes thru that pretty much in the same sequence of processes… …nordic..Developmental needs ARE for every single person on earth...They apply to EVERYONE......That includes the OP.
Developmental psychology. I am sure that you think that I know nothing about it. But, I know plenty. You are basing you description that an 18 yo is not an adult because of brain maturation? Ok. Then no one is an adult until they are in the mid twenties. Yep, that is about when the brain has reached maturity.
Or are you basing it on stages of development? You say that everyone is the same on this? Not true. Do you really want me to break out my books and prove to you that not everyone goes through the same stages? Or that some people don’t even get to the adult developmental stages? Because if you really want to go into that, I am very capable in that area.
Ditto for me too.....DUH....Funny how people will twist what you say in order to continue playing their games..At no place did I say all 30 yr old men who befriend 18 yr olds are sexual predators....
Actually, you have posted numerous blanket statements about that. Msg:63 is a prime example.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
34 (
view
)
Would like to Keep it Professional and Friends ONLY
Posted:
7/24/2008 8:45:47 AM
What was it? Was it the wording of the original post? Was it Msg:2 that started it? Why do most not understand the OP?
This thread would make a fantastic psychology study. Interview all the posters and find out what went wrong.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
208 (
view
)
How old is too old?
Posted:
7/24/2008 8:36:22 AM
Translation...You really need to deal with your bitterness and anger and resentment.
Huh? Where did that come from? You know, if you are going to make statements like that then you should at least give reference and context about my posts that will justify your opinions. Or are you labeling me that way because I don’t agree with you?
Its just a matter of time before they break out of that.
Who doesn’t feel the need to break out of their routine from time to time? I think that is human nature.
Im sure you will attack that and somehow take it out of context to justify your false assumptions and need to be "right" , which is why Im done.
Do you really think that I am attacking you? I don’t, I think that I am disagreeing with you. I even quote your posts that I disagree with, give examples as to why I disagree, and then I share my opinions on the matter.
I hope you find some peace in your life to counter the hate you seem to have inside.
Why do you think that I hate? What is it that you think that I hate? Where did that come from? Do you give any justification on these blank statements that you make? Broad generalizations?
If I feel anything towards you it is a bit of frustration. You talk like you are a group instead of speaking about yourself and for yourself. Is that where your confidence comes from? Does it make you feel like you are not alone on your viewpoints? Also you do make broad generalizations without any support whatsoever; you make them in almost every post. Why do you do that? It is like you pull random thoughts out of thin air in an attempt to convince me that you are right. You haven’t answered most of my questions of you, and the ones that you do are vague and in context toward another poster.
take it out of context to justify your false assumptions and need to be "right".
I have to admit, I do enjoy being right, but that doesn’t help anything. I am not trying to be right here. I am wanting you to explain your way of thinking, and why you think that way. I am looking for your credibility.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
30 (
view
)
Would like to Keep it Professional and Friends ONLY
Posted:
7/24/2008 12:28:05 AM
DamCute, didn’t you know that most people don’t actually read the forum posts? They just find a forum that is close to what they feel like going off on, and then they go off on it. lol It is so very sad.
Major note from the Original Post:
We've grown to be good working partners and friends. That's all.
Now for the ladies:
When you work with someone in a professional setting that you are attracted to, how do you ladies keep up the professional stance without having to walk on eggshells?
Ok, I will answer this from my experiences, since most women here have not. I have noticed that most smile, but find things to do to keep their minds off of the concept. Also, they avoid eye contact other than a quick glimpse. Then off to the bathroom or wherever to recoup, shake their hands like they are trying to dry them, and then stare at their own reflection in the mirror until they remember how to breath.
Guys, what do you think would be the best way to handle this if some chick you work with has a crush on you. How would you apprecaite this being handled?
If I were the guy in your situation OP, then do what I just explained. But, since I am single, you could talk with me about it, and if nothing else we could become really good at flirting with each other, as long as we kept our professional awkwardness in good spirits.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
124 (
view
)
Mensa? anyone?
Posted:
7/23/2008 11:53:07 PM
This says that I have an IQ of 181. Oh, I am holding it upside down.
Bull.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
206 (
view
)
How old is too old?
Posted:
7/23/2008 10:24:10 PM
On the contrary… …Im living in a new state… …BTW...I did go back to college full time as a 33 year old to earn a Masters degree.....I can assure you it was far less scarey than as an 18 yr old undergraduate...
That is awesome. Really it is.
So now tell me why you think that an 18yo cannot do things like that for themselves?
You have stated many times that an 18yo is not an adult.
Why do you think that an 18yo cannot possibly venture out and date whomever they choose?
We are willing to try new things.
Why do you speak as if you are making statements for all women near their 40’s? Speak for yourself. I know women in their 40’s that do not do new things or even hardly leave their homes. Should I group you with them? Because all 40ish women must be the same right? Did you move from your home to his home, but still keep yourself at home? No change there. Are you really experiencing new things? Are you traveling? Or did you just move from one stationary position to another stationary position?
Also your statements make it sound like 18yo are not willing to try new things. I am raising the BS Flag on your understanding of 18yo women.
Youth, especially young women, are much more worried about how they look to others and what others think of them....The peer group is still ultra important to them.
Again, you group them as all the same. BS. You really need to get out more because the Youth, especially young women that I meet, are nowhere close to what you describe. The ones that I know could give a rats ass as to what others think about them; plus a lot of them are out exploring the world as much as their means permit. And you know what? They are doing it without adult supervision. Yes, that is right, they are adults and they are quite capable.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
200 (
view
)
How old is too old?
Posted:
7/23/2008 3:06:44 PM
I do what I can to learn from my bad experiences! That is what makes me smarter as I age.
I don’t think so. Knowing more things does not make me smarter. The ability to rationalize and understand someone else, or a new topic, is what I consider smart. I know more things now than before, but new topics do not make sense so easily; calculus for example. And, the more that I know, the more that I realize that I do not know. It is exponential, the more that I learn, the more that I need to learn, and realizing that there is so much more that I do not know.
Knowing more does not help on tests. Being smarter helps on tests. I used to be much smarter. Even thought I know much more than before.
We have a certainty about ourselves and what suits us, an automatic self care, an easy comfort in own skin and a self confidence that may be threatening to some, but most certainly absent in an 18 yr old.
Oh whatever. That is a bunch of horseshit. All that that means is that you have stopped growing as a person and are set in your ways. You know all that you are going to know, because you are not learning anything new. When you gain certainty, you are losing ability. Your mind has shut down to the little microcosm, and that is all that you know. Do you have any idea how easy it is to be certain and confident in a world that stays the same? Where the problems that recur are the same as before, as before, as before?
I tell you what capegardengirl, if you were to leave your comfort zone and gain new experiences, or went back to college full time, then you would be more scared and uncertain than an 18yo. That is because an 18yo is expecting uncertainty and they know that they do not know things, and they try to cope, learn, and be smart about things.
But by all means, sit there and think that you are smarter than an 18yo. But eventually the people that come to see you are going to realize that the same routine only works for so long, then it is time to move on.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
87 (
view
)
I am appalled.
Posted:
7/23/2008 10:26:01 AM
you would look exactly like solid snake.
Hey, now you have a ready made costume for Halloween. Just go as yourself.
“Everybody look!!! It’s Solid Snake!!!
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
196 (
view
)
How old is too old?
Posted:
7/23/2008 8:36:53 AM
You're not going to get much smarter as you get older. You're just going to have so many bad experiences.
There is truth in that. I was smarter when I was younger, and I have grades to prove it.
I think that the reason that most of us are here, is because we didn’t know the social schematics enough to make our relationships work, or even have credible relationships.
I wish the OP the best in everything, because she is smarter than we are, she knows what she wants. The last thing that I would want for her is to turn into a bitter old hag that is angry at all the men in the world.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
86 (
view
)
I am appalled.
Posted:
7/22/2008 10:46:32 PM
c'mon people.
Was it something I said?
Was it?
What is the name of the video game? Earth? Is that what it is called? And we are all just characters? Or is it just me? Am I the only character? I cannot prove that anything existed before my existence. Is it existence? What do I call it now?
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
28 (
view
)
Wow!! Can you believe this one? What should I do?
Posted:
7/22/2008 10:28:04 PM
demanded to see their house, ID, place they work, divorce decree, and as well had run a criminal background check on them.
You know, I think of all that as being responsible. I have had the misfortune of an ‘Oh by the way, I am still married’. Geez. What the hell is that?
So no, I would not be offended if a woman checked up on me. An open book even. I have nothing to hide.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
25 (
view
)
Wow!! Can you believe this one? What should I do?
Posted:
7/22/2008 9:57:59 PM
he was never available after 7pm.
???? ?? ???? ??? Umm ??? Red flag maybe??? Yeah ??? If you didn’t know, it is.
Ok, I will be honest. That was one of the biggest ‘Red Flags’ That there is.
it seemed so perfect.
Umm, again, Red Flag. It seemed perfect because it was a lie.
Why would you be intimate with some guy who hasnt shown you his world, but only talked about it?.
Nice post stampagirl.
Why do people fall for this crap? I need to build a RedFlagoMeter, I could make a fortune.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
82 (
view
)
I am appalled.
Posted:
7/22/2008 9:11:13 PM
I told a woman once that she looked like Shania Twain. Oh boy was that the wrong thing to do. She took it as a personal insult. WTF
Earth to Reality, Earth to Reality, come in Reality.
When are the aliens going to show themselves? I can’t hardly take this anymore.
In the end, there can be only one.
Translation
Joined:
5/12/2008
Msg:
61 (
view
)
I am appalled.
Posted:
7/22/2008 1:39:58 PM
Hey, maybe she looked like Meryl Silverburgh and was looking to be your sidekick.
Show ALL Forums