online dating service
REGISTER | MAIL/PROFILE | HELP | NOW ONLINE | SEARCH | RATING | FORUMS | SUCCESS STORIES

 

     
Posted In Forum:
Home   login   MyForums  
Show ALL Forums  
 
 Author Thread: Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 27 (view)
 
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/22/2007 8:19:50 AM
Hey, all:

Well, zip-a-dee-doo-dah! There are some victories for comsumers and common people. Merck announced in the past couple of days that they are dropping the state to state lobbying effort in the U.S. to try and get Gardisil mandated for young girls. A lot of bad publicity has occurred in Texas and the effort has been poorly received in several states and outright rejected in some others.

In Texas, legislation was filed to override Governor GoodHair (Gawd, I miss Molly Ivins) Perry's executive order requiring the Merck product. And public hearings in the state brought up lots of objections, based on religion, gender discrimination, personal freedom, medical issues, government corruption/government by edict/government by corporate oligarchy, etc. Maybe the state Repuglicans took a big hit, too. Well, one can hope.

However, the corporate oligarchy marches on. It seems likely Merck will almost certainly continue some effort to market the vaccine to governmental health agencies, thereby continuing to bypass the public. When so much potential profit is to be made, it would seem like a 'sure thing' to a gambler.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 155 (view)
 
Our aging bodies
Posted: 2/21/2007 12:51:46 PM
Hey, all:

Thank you, Fox: Very well said. And, uh, nice Maple Leaf. It does take effort, self-awareness, pride, and discipline. The longer you wait, the more of those things it takes, and the less likely one is to reverse the things that can be reversed.

I weigh about 20 pounds more than in high school and have more muscle. I eat well and sleep well. Of course, I have lost muscle tone and skin tone and gained some wrinkles. Again, we CAIN'T do nothing about gravity (well, in Yoga you can do headstands, etc.), so fretting over those things is a waste of time.

Age is less and less about our physical state and more and more about our mental and emotional state. Knowing the difference and focusing on what is important is key.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 10 (view)
 
Heads Up...Collision with an asteroid could be coming your way
Posted: 2/21/2007 12:13:22 PM
Hey, all:

Rocks and Stones: Uh, I am not going to hold your hand. Do a search.

There are a number of theories on the cyclicity of planetary events, and the length of the cycle. One is an ~100 million year cycle which corresponds with a shorter 30-35 million year one. As I said, the cycle is a planetary one, and may have had nothing happen on Earth, whereas other strictly Earth-centered events may have caused extinctions of different scales, and even other planetary events not associated with a cycle may have occurred.

I hope this will cut off your tendency to make overly broad conclusions, or to change things to suit your argument. Two examples in one passage:
...mass extinction events occur on 30 million year cycles. This is something that I have never heard before, nor have I read that anywhere. I would not assign any sort of cyclicity to mass extinction events.


If you wish to assume "30" mya that is your trap, and if you wish to assume any absolute conclusions from general statements, that is as well. If all you know is rocks and where to find coal or oil, that is rather uninspired and limiting.


All: An irony is that if there is an asteroid coming toward us real soon, we might try to destroy or move it, so that we can continue our own extinction event. A further irony is if the asteroid hits in, oh, 5 million years, there won't be anything left to hurt.


Off-topic: The current extinction event (alluded to above) is strictly human caused and is widely understood as such, despite the naysayers industry. Pollution, habitat destruction, anthropogenic climate change due to combustion of fossil fuels and its sequestered Carbon, and over-exploitation of resources are the major causes, and these are all attributable entirely to humans.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 90 (view)
 
Why is slavery still present?
Posted: 2/21/2007 9:42:48 AM
Hey, all:

Why? Greed, hatred, avarice, ignorance, culture, tradition, xenophobia, elitism, 'not-my-problem', pretty much cover 99.99% of the reasons. Have these changed over time? No.

Will we be able to end all the kinds of slavery that have been mentioned here? Maybe, but not with the political structure in the world, since that is the broken down horse we rode in on and what got us here. The corporate oligarchy in place in the world will continue as they have for generations if they are not seen for the evil they are, and driven from power. And informed Populism is what is needed.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 6 (view)
 
Heads Up...Collision with an asteroid could be coming your way
Posted: 2/21/2007 8:29:00 AM
Hey, all:

There is a lot of evidence that strongly suggests that there is a basis for our fear, ignoring all the Sci-Fi crap. Paleontologists and biologists studying such things as natural selection and taxomony, discovered that much of the known record of mass extinctions seems to happen on about a 30-35 million year cycle. Obviously the best known of these is at the K-T boundary 65 million years ago, which is when the dinosaurs disappeared. We now have strong evidence that an asteroid or comet crashed near what is now the Yucatan Peninsula, and the timing is very close. There are other prior mass extinction events which occurred on the same 30-35 million year cycle.

There have also been times when nothing we know of happened on the same timeline. When Comet Shoemaker-Levi 9 broke up and crashed into Jupiter, creating a string of smaller craters rather than one large one, scientists realized we could also have asteroid events in which no cataclysm occurred. They went out and found several locations on Earth where previously unassociated smaller craters were determined to have been created around the same time. No known mass extinctions were associated with that time, so it appears the event was not cataclysmic. The flora and fauna of the time dodged a bullet.

Why is this important? We now on the Earth are sitting on the 30-35 million year bubble. If there is a perturbation in the Solar System that occurs on this cycle, a concentration of asteroids or comets that arrives in our neighborhood at this time, maybe we should watch out.

Of course, the elite will want to launch a series of missions to colonize Mars so the 'cream' of humanity can be preserved, while those of us in the $100 suits get blasted by the hot death of an asteroid. Yeah, that's justice.

Something that puzzles me is the idea that asteroid collisions are 'meant to be'. What utter, ignorant, fatalistic, 'not-my-problem' c r a p.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 15 (view)
 
maturity level and our age group...
Posted: 2/21/2007 7:43:45 AM
Hey, all:

It occurs to me that there are a lot of people who are here precisely because they are immature, and this is all the game they got! None of them have the ability to express their thoughts or feelings or ideas (or they don't have any!), so they are not part of the 1 in 20 who participate in the forums, and maybe they stay because they do find serial short-term partners.

I expect some are desperate in some way, and many just flail blindly in their own way. And extreme example of the 'shotgun' approach.

The really sad part is that much of the time, the immature ones are allowed to create the impressions we keep in our minds.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 26 (view)
 
Over 50-Where do you go when you are lonely?
Posted: 2/20/2007 8:04:10 PM
Hey, all:

Hey, Annapurna Dana: Without being critical, I would like to gently point out that you are confusing 2 concepts, that of being alone and of being lonely. Being alone is a physical condition of simply not having anyone around, and being lonely is an emotional state.

I live in the country 9 miles outside a town of 4000, I am alone most of the time, but I am seldom, if ever, lonely. I stay busy, with work and play, and I do and stay involved in many things. I keep music, TV, or video playing. Even when I am eating I have a book or magazine open. When I am in public places I make an effort to talk to strangers, just as a matter of practice. When I am with friends or other social settings I enjoy them thoroughly, so that although I miss them at other times, the times together compensate for it.

We have all heard the comment of being alone in a crowd, so it is all relative to our state of mind. We all can work on our emotional health so that whether we are with a herd of people or by ourselves, we don't have to be lonely.

I hope this helps.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 118 (view)
 
Bio- Diesel, SVO, Electric, Hydrogen, Solar, Wind, Hybrids
Posted: 2/20/2007 3:09:49 PM
Hey, all:

Slyder: When you left the message it got me thinking and I remembered what you were talking about:

Here are some sites, starting with YouTube:

video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2245729493419202077

www.ecorazzi.com/?p=1111

wirelessdigest.typepad.com/hippyshopper/2007/01/mhv4_hydrogen_p.html

I couldn't find a reference that states how the H2 is stored, but I presume it is pressurized, since I don't believe any matrix had been invented, such as Ovshinsky has done now, to contain it.


This one concerns GM and a H2 car in 2010(?). Huh, we'll see how long that lasts:

w.autobloggreen.com/2007/02/07/gm-plans-to-produce-hydrogen-fuel-car-by-2010/


Regarding 'disinformation', rather than 'misinformed', you were probably right about that, too. Or does anyone not believe the power of the corporate oligarchy in 1978? C'mon, wake up. It is practically seamless throughout history.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 4 (view)
 
Saving the world takes a lot of marketing
Posted: 2/20/2007 12:40:58 PM
Hey, all:

Ya know, DamnFool (there's a telling name), you can aspirate your whole goddam lunch for all I care. The same stooges who are apologists for Big Coal, Big Oil, Big War, Big Detroit, Big Nukes, Big Tobacco, ad infinitum, can pick and choose any damn statistic they want to, and out of context, with no reference point for comparison, and distort any position they wish. THIS IS WHAT THEY DO!!! Or have you not heard the line, 'Figures don't lie, but liars can figure.'

I have never been to Canada but I caught several references that should catch others' attention:

Our Premier (hightest political office in the land) has a brother whom writes a newspaper column. On February 17th this corporate apologist and handmaiden to the rich and powerful spewed this piece into the local rag.


Compare any years' profits, or any CEO salaries, or any marketing budgets, or any other goddam thing you want, from any of the 'Bigs' above, then try to keep your entire goddam stomach down.

Continue to consider pieces like the one Eihwaz provided out of context, and you'll never see the 'Big' picture--but that is what they want you to do! Don't you get it? Doesn't everyone . . . . get it?

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 13 (view)
 
Older health care concerns
Posted: 2/20/2007 9:05:16 AM
Hey, all:

Hey, Clay: A second opinion is always a good idea, and a third and fourth and fifth, not until you get the answers you wish for, but until they tell you definitively what is going on and how to fix it. Make the b a s t a r d s slow down and talk to you. You are smart--I can tell that--learn all you can so you know when some putz with a diploma is blowin' smoke up your skirt. Take a list of questions and MAKE THEM ANSWER YOU! Remember the medical profession is a MONEY-MAKING mechanism, and everyone goddam one of them is selling something, from drugs to therapy to cutting, so you are your own best judge of what and who to use.

And dear, there are so many things we face, why compound it by smoking? Huh? Everywhere we look, we find smoking makes things worse. I know it is difficult--well, I have seen it and read it but never experienced it directly myself--but YOU CAN QUIT!!! Get that huge-a s s monkey off your back and a lot of other things you can flick off like it was bits of dust. Empower yourself!

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 5 (view)
 
Good Idea...Bad Idea...You be the judge!
Posted: 2/20/2007 8:09:27 AM
Hey, all:

Hey, Suzanne: I happen to agree with you completely. Yes, of course there are parents who don't care about supporting their children, but shaming all of them without recourse is not the solution. If a parent is trying to find work to be able to pay support and a potential employer sees this, and denies a job based on it, it would have the opposite result than that desired. Again, no recourse.

There are many aspects of government and society which confuse the means and the ends of problems, and when mere punishment is the tacit goal, instead of SOLVING a problem, we have taken a huge step backward.

Yep, bad idea.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 7 (view)
 
Argon Windows.
Posted: 2/19/2007 11:15:23 PM
Hey, all:

Hey, Limestone: I read the article in HP I mentioned, and it provides some comments that will contradict what our friend Puppeteer has offered. One main issue is the vinyl framing material. The key is 'vinyl' which is derived from polyvinyl choride, a plastic material associated with the toxin dioxin. Many recommend doing away with them altogether. They release dioxin when burned which adds to the hazard in a fire. Plus thermal expansion makes them less favorable. Their best choice recommendation is to use fiberglass frames.

Yeah, Ar is a gas, and technically glass is a "super-cooled liquid" but to suggest any rapid leakage is a little overdone. I would not worry too much about the long term performance. Tempered glass also has very good performance characteristics.

One item in the article that caught my attention was the fact that your choice of window can depend on where in the home the window is intended, and how you intend to use the window from a heating and cooling standpoint. If you plan on having Southside overhangs to protect from Summer sun but allow Winter sun for passive heat gain (is that a part of the 32" thick stone floor?), you actually want different performance from other applications. Windows on the west side might have different characteristics to prevent excess afternoon heating.

I have favored casement windows over sash windows for a long time, since casement windows have much better ventilation features. From a practical standpoint, they are easier to clean, too!

One thing we all know is that you typically get more if you pay more, and really good windows are expensive. But they pay for themselves many times over when properly selected, in energy savings and resale value.

Regarding other greener construction issues, you can spend more on LED lights and save on wiring needs, and a lot on electricity since they take much less to operate. Codes are now addressing the shift to these lights, so you might want to check on that.

Another good idea especially with the space you have may be an earth-coupled heat pump. For heat they can be used with convective/conductive coils in floors, and also closed-system solar collectors with glycol. For cooling you can have a conventional forced air HVAC system using the heat pump.

Given water concerns I would not build a home that did not have a water cachement system installed, and graywater separation and collection as well.

I am guessing you are going to have photovoltaic for electricity power. You might look into the new stick on roll PV panels from Uni-Solar or PV "shingles" that fit into conventional asphalt mineral roofing materials.

It sounds like you already have a very good handle on things, and you have my admiration for doing what you are doing! It sounds very interesting! "It's not easy, being Green."

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 101 (view)
 
environmentalists
Posted: 2/19/2007 10:33:31 PM
Hey, all:

Our personal lifestyles and practices exist on an infinite continuum, and the things listed here are just a collection of points along that continuum.

I think the items are just some examples of what someone might do who wished to make some difference in environmental issues, although there is a great deal of overlap with other issues, philosophies and practices. Some of them are also practiced by Eastern religions, especially Zen Buddhism, who believe there are foods which are better and some which are worse. Oddly, root crops are frowned on by Zen practitioners, but some are among the best vegetables available. I practice some Zen ideals, but I eat meat and I know devout Buddhists who eat meat. I also do some of my own vegetables and fruit and I raise chickens for eggs and meat.

Some of the items here are somewhat symbolic, and serve as an example of what many of us could do to improve the environment. Many of us would do well to pay attention to our practices and try and find ways to improve.

There is a lot we can all do to move toward sustainability, which is one of the most crucial areas that the world's population must move. A couple of people in previous messages have correctly touched on this.

I personally do take notice of the women here who either support or oppose behavior considered to be green. Some of you, wow, if your phone doesn't ring, it's me, and some of you, I would be honored to know more.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 8 (view)
 
Some things you need to know before the world ends......
Posted: 2/19/2007 11:39:19 AM
Hey, all:


"I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. As a result of war, corporations have been enthroned, and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all the wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the republic is destroyed. I feel, at this moment, more anxiety for the safety of my country than ever before, even in the midst of war. God grant that my suspicions may prove groundless."

Lincoln in a letter to Col. William F. Elkins on November 21, 1864


Gee, Eihwaz, the above only makes me feel worse. Given the history since Lincoln said this, corporations have been further enthroned, by oil, railroads, 'corporate personhood', the industrial revolution, electricity-as-commodity, more wars, the Cold War, government subsidies, the rise of the corporate oligarchy, petrochemicals, DDT, plastics, the transportation system, Big Oil, Big Coal, Big Auto, Big Pharma, Big Insurance, and on and on and on. Lincoln's suspicions were not groundless.

Surprising the World hasn't already ended--it probably has always felt that it has for billions, living and dead. Those of us on the bubble have a different perception. Like many parasites, the corporate parasites have no perception or concern for the ultimate survival of the host--only short-term gain matters.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 4 (view)
 
Second largest health insurer in US sued for racketeering..
Posted: 2/19/2007 10:43:28 AM
Hey, all:

I must say I am not surprised at any of this news. As far as I am concerned, the only reason why the whole business (insurance, medicine) is not a racket is the legal legislative protection of the corporate oligarchy. Corruption rules.

It is one of the biggest money making activities in the world, with huge, obscene profits for Big Insurance, Big Pharma, and a huge, growing, corporate medical/hospital industry--all done by marketing and government cooperation.

We are sold fast food, and crap in grocery stores, a sedentary lifestyle drinking beer and watching sports, then this industry sells us the "cure" for the inevitable result. Even if we take individual responsibility for our health we are still coerced into insurance, and to subsidize the dumb a s s e s with the beers.

This is all part of the "Less Government" and "Privatizing" mantra of stooges for Reaganomics and neo-con artists like Grover Norquist. What they don't tell you is they are defacto making "business" PART OF THE GOVERNMENT! So the Dow is an extension of government.

I suggest suits like this will in time do one of 2 things--if a more populist approach separating government and business is taken, lawsuits like this will increase drastically for a period of years, then as the crooks are found and punished such suits will greatly reduce. On the other hand, if the corporate oligarchy has their way, they will institute a "pre-emptive preamble" just like they did for the goddam drug industry, and these lawsuits will disappear overnight. Watch for legislation proposed by someone like Joe Lieberman, who is the biggest Big Pharma, Big Insurance whore around.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 8 (view)
 
Widows/Widowers - When is it too soon and......
Posted: 2/18/2007 8:02:25 PM
Hey, all:


Men replace and women Mourn............


Man, it would really be nice to step away from the goddam sexist chicken s h i t stereotypes. Really.

By this stupid rule if a man mourns his deceased wife, that makes him a woman. So it has the inevitable tendency to enforce itself. Can't step outside the goddam sexist stereotype. Please, just goddam please.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 5 (view)
 
Time To Heal or Get Back On The Bike?
Posted: 2/18/2007 7:43:24 PM
Hey, all:

Hey, Scryer: Uh, first, I don't think the reference to 'getting back on the bike' is your best choice!

Seriously, there is no reason you can't heal and meet people at the same time--they are not mutually exclusive. Just be careful you take it slow and maintain a balance in your emotions. It may be best to try and deveiop a friendship first so you don't have expectations your heart can't handle. In other words, to reluctantly use the 'bike' analogy, you probably should not enter a 'race' at this time! Good luck!

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 39 (view)
 
Should we tax the wealthy,or continue to pay our heroes like chumps?
Posted: 2/18/2007 1:11:45 PM
Hey, all:

I have long felt that the income made by the most wealthy people in the world is nothing short of obscenity--sheer selfish narcissistic obscenity. In the U.S., a much higher income tax rate would help redistribute SOME of that money so that teachers, firefighters, and the military could be paid more and taken care of more. I have said for many years if I were a dictator (benevolent of course) teachers would make bankers' salaries and bankers would need 2 f u c k i n g jobs.

For anyone who proposes such things--FLAT TAXES are highly regressive and are contrary to this interest--if you don't know what "regressive" means, you need to learn, and if you do know, you should be ashamed for your thoughtlessness.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 113 (view)
 
Bio- Diesel, SVO, Electric, Hydrogen, Solar, Wind, Hybrids
Posted: 2/18/2007 11:01:56 AM
Hey, all:

Off-topic: AhoyThereDave:
By the way, I am familiar with the manatee hanging out at the power plant but does that pose a risk to them? I would think it would increase their range.


I will assume no one here knows much about this species. Its correct common name is West Indian Manatee, and as the name implies it was once found throughout the shallow waters of the Caribbean but also the Gulf of Mexico. It was once found it the coastal areas of lakes and rivers and bays of all the Gulf states of the U.S. It is slow moving and easy to catch and was highly exploited for food. This exploitation, death due to being hit by boats, and habitat loss all caused the species to be endangered in the U.S. So its range and population size in the U.S. is a critical issue in the recovery of the species. So, yes, power plant outfalls do support them, and as long as they are protected from boat deaths it is a benefit to them. And if populations increase it may increase their range, but that would only help restore its range to historical limits. Restoration of historical range is on of the keys to recovery. They are still occasionally found along the Texas coast, including just this Winter in Corpus Christi. It was captured and taken to Florida for ultimate release.

One reason I feel and act and support the policies and technologies that I do is because of my background as a wildlife and endangered species biologist. All these things help to reduce our ecological footprint, to turn away from the human gluttony on natural resources. This in turn helps make things like the above possible.

Okay, more or less ON-topic:

AhoyThereDave: Yes, earth-coupled heat pumps do have geographic and climate limitations, but I am not familiar enough with them to know. Extreme climates, either hot or cold, make them less efficient. And the technology does not lend itself well to existing urban lots, and even suburban lots, if retro-fit is the focus. The size of the lots and the length of the plastic glycol lines demand that the lines be placed vertically rather than horizontally. If someone could come up with a compact high-performance truck-mounted drilling rig that can get into back yards for example, and do so conveniently for owners and neighbors, that would make a difference.

The advantages remain though, when used where practical. They do take less energy since there is no direct heating, such as with a resistance coil or fossil fuel burning. I have heard they operate in the high teens in SEER, which is the measure of efficiency in HVAC systems. Cost of equipment and installation is higher, but the return on investment pays that back in years.

Would you explain more about the solar heating system you mentioned? It sounds a lot like a solar domestic hot water heating circuit, which is what I have for my water heat. It consists of a solar collector running water through it, powered by a PV-powered pump. It is an open system and simply runs through the existing water heater tank. The same principle can be applied to room heat by scaling up and running coils in the floor, what is erroneously referred to as 'radiant' heat, when in fact it is only convective or conductive--when naming it, someone had a poor understanding of the concept of heat transfer.

There are actually two forms of earth-coupled dwellings, one passive, one active--passive uses thermal mass drectly coupled to the substrate to transfer stable heat into a thermally efficient dwelling, which helps to even out temperature extremes, and active, which uses such things as heat pumps.

Regarding what you refer to, please explain more about what it includes and requires. I know, for example, conversion efficiency of PV panels is low, but that means nothing to me since the energy is abundant and free. It is a little like complaining about drinking water from a waterfall, since you are bound to spill some. Over the lifetime of PV panels the energy that is captured covers the cost, embodied energy, embodied material, magnitudes over the initial expenditure. This investment is a no-brainer, especially when compared to the costs of doing otherwise.

And regarding investment capital, yes it is an issue, but the amounts are far less than that required for centralized, electricity-as-commodity fossil fuels systems (or others), which would never have been done without huge government subsidies which continue today. One of the biggest struggles in sustainability is achieving some more beneficial equality in these subsidies. Again this gets back to the corporate oligarchy and the fossil fuels industry. They have a commodity to protect and customers to keep in the dark, so to speak, when it comes to alternatives. And the subsidies are among the hidden costs of the energy we use. One simple example is the billions of U.S. dollars paid for health care due to damages caused to coal miners--yes, BILLIONS.

I would also appreciate you explaining what you mean by 'emotional bias' against what you appear to say is manufacturing sustainablity products. All the products I am aware of have been extensively vetted for their contribution to sustainability, and would not last in the market if they were not valid. Please explain.


I will point out that there is an ideal hierarchy in sustainability, starting from totally passive heating, lighting, transportation, nutrition, etc., which exists only as an ideal. No one seriously supports such a scenario, but approaching this ideal in any aspect where practical is extremely desireable. As is often pointed out, there are costs to everything, but it is the return on that cost that turns it into an investment, rather than a continual drain on resources.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 2 (view)
 
Argon Windows.
Posted: 2/17/2007 8:15:42 AM
Hey, all:

Hey, Limestone Lady: (That wouldn't be Texas Limestone, would it?) [Okay, I checked and I can see it's not.] Coincidentally the Feb/Mar 2007 (current) issue of "Home Power" magazine has an article on energy-efficient windows, well beyond Ar fill, for both new construction and retro-fit. Probably covers a lot of what you might need. The rest of the magazine is pure gold for junkies anyway.

I wish I could say I had a lot experience with them, but I certainly have heard a lot, and with such windows and many other features you can have a very good, thermally efficient, energy-conserving, long-lasting dwelling.

It also sounds like you are in an excellent position to build a very sustainable green building. Passive thermal stone walls and floors, etc. would be right up your alley. I don't have the web address but Austin [Texas] Green Building Code is the world's gold standard, plus the LEED standards from AIA [?]. Good luck!

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 304 (view)
 
Impeachment is imperative ...
Posted: 2/17/2007 7:48:22 AM
Hey, all:

In the end it comes down to politics and numbers. I personally hate every single goddam one of them, in case anyone wonders. Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Wolfowitz, Feith, Rove, Libby, and a whole bunch more should be fitted with leg irons, and left to rot in a rat-infested hole. I also think the evidence is incontrovertible, "slam-dunk", etc. Breaking laws and lying about it, evil incompetence, and committing criminal acts before which they had to commit other criminal acts, and on and on and on, is enough to convict anyone.

The title here is absolutely correct but incomplete. "Impeachment AND CONVICTION ARE imperative." They can easily impeach in the House, but they simply cannot reach 2/3 necessary to convict, regardless of proof, simply due to the distribution of numbers in the Senate. With barely a Democratic majority, only a few Republicans will break with the party and vote to convict. Numercially impossible. The Democratic "leaders" know this, and so all they can do is be indignant and posture for effect.

I do wish Conyers would have a series of hearings, which would put some of the evil of BushCo.'s administration on record, so that maybe we can learn from their and our mistakes--part of the "won't get fooled again" desire.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 24 (view)
 
News Sources?
Posted: 2/17/2007 7:26:28 AM
Hey, all:

Hey, Chicklet: Wow, I found my head nodding vigorously at 3 points in reading your message. First, thanks for the feedback on Christian Science Monitor. As a person who routinely says "Ptoooie!" when religion is brought up, for me the Monitor is a strange item but they do a great job.

And enough about the trailer trash Anna Nicole Smith. There was a wonderful woman columnist Molly Ivins who died 2-3 weeks ago but got little attention, but who did immeasureably more good. Oh, well.

And yeah, "Now" on PBS is a very good one. I prefer it when they focus on one story at a time instead of several per show, but it is topical, contrary to mainstream politics and 'bidness', and uncompromising.

Lots of great sources for news have been brought up. Good thread.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 4 (view)
 
A National Intelligence Estimate on the United States
Posted: 2/16/2007 11:48:08 AM
Hey, all:


We Americans are reluctant empire builders. We do not look lustfully at other nations and seek to make them our own. We have absolutely no interest in conquering Canada or Mexico.
Gawd, what color is the sky on your planet?

First, all one has to do to find out about CURRENT empire building wishes is to look at the "Project for a New American Century".

Second, U.S. history is entirely one of empire building from the Revolution to Manifest Destiny to Gunboat Diplomacy to the Carter Doctrine, with a near-infinite amount of fill between these events.

Third, as far as the leadership and marketing and politics and the corporate oligarchy is concerned Canada and Mexico could not BE more conquered! It's the sublime end result of another fine piece of U.S. imperialism, the Monroe Doctrine.

Gee, let's read U.S. history with a little less gauze in front of our eyes.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 16 (view)
 
Who Killed the Electric Car - documovie -What if it was not dead
Posted: 2/16/2007 11:11:34 AM
Hey, all:

Off-topic: Well, gee, Rocks, you are free to disagree. And as far as time is concerned you take all the time you wish to express the things you think. And I will do the same in my own way. Comparing the transportation situation in the U.S. to Europe while ignoring history and geography and resources is not very well-informed--but go ahead.

The old men who have run things since we stood upright and put on clothes have the power and money to do pretty much what they want to stay in power and money. And controlling the market for commodities such as fossil fuels is one of their most important activities, and anything that influences changes in that commodity becomes part of the activity. This is also absolutely true of the EV-1 and all other trends that threaten to reduce our use of their commodity, and the loss of their profits. Marketing and politics and legislation are the main tools of their trade. Deal with it or not.

Corporate oligarchy, Corporate oligarchy, Corporate oligarchy, Corporate oligarchy....


On-topic: The large batteries used in all these applications are highly recycleable and recycled. This saves a huge amount in new resources and reduces pollution associated with disposal. The same people who support the growth of the technology are the same ones who support sustainability and so are motivated to encourage policies and actions that increase recycling. Even if this wasn't true the economics of recycling would still keep the level high. Things are too valuable not to.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 19 (view)
 
News Sources?
Posted: 2/16/2007 10:47:43 AM
Hey, all:

I would repeat several of the choices already offered, and add my own. BBC, PBS, ITN, London Times, plus, which might sound as if it comes from left field, is the Christian Science Monitor.

All provide great alternatives to the right-wing corporate news system in the U.S.

Plus as an environmentalist and sustainability advocate, I check many websites frequently. Grist is a favorite. I also refer to MoveOn. org a lot.

There have been some very good suggestions made for some I was not aware of. Thanks.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 7 (view)
 
Is the World ready for a minority President of the United States
Posted: 2/16/2007 7:33:54 AM
Hey, all:

I don't believe the 'WORLD' cares what race or gender the U.S. President is. Thinking they do is a narcissistic assumption on the part of us in the U.S. To paraphrase the great Martin, it is the content of his/her character that matters.

On the whole, I believe the U.S. is ready for a minority/groundbreaking President, and in fact if the right person comes to the front, he/she would be embraced like none other.

The down side of course is that there will be some who will hate the person regardless of who it is. The country has many garden-variety crazies, and racists, and misogynists who would just go over the edge in a heartbeat.

Let's see, Kennedy was assassinated we don't clearly know why or how or even clearly who. There were 3 obvious documented attempts on Ford, and he was a white guy who only pardoned Nixon. And 1 on Reagan, and that one was just a crazy.

Yep, a minority President would be a challenge in security. But it would be a welcome change to the old blind greedy rich white men who have been in charge. And if that person leads the country in a progressive, new, egalitarian, sustainable direction, history would definitely be good to that President.

Coincidentally, I was just watching the video "Right Now" by Van Halen from 1992. Does everyone see the huge dramatic way in how much things have changed?

"Right now, justice is being perverted in a court of law."

"Right now, oil companies and old men are in control."

"Right now, it's business as usual in the woods."

"Right now, forces are aligning against you."

"Right now, our government is doing things we think only other countries do."



David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 14 (view)
 
Who Killed the Electric Car - documovie -What if it was not dead
Posted: 2/15/2007 11:18:16 PM
Hey, all:

I suggest that it is not a matter of when things are ripe, since pure market forces do not have that much to do with the situation of the mix and availability of vehicles. CAFE legislation and the exemptions for trucks and SUVs are perfect examples of this, and we can add in the lack of balance for subsidies for energy sources: of the last U.S. energy bill something like $85 billion went for fossil fuels and $1 bil for sustainable fuels. And they didn't send 100s of thousands of military to the Middle East not to take advantage of the spoils.

I do agree it will almost certainly be an Asian, probably Japanese or Korean company that first comes up with a pure electric or mostly electric hybrid car for the mass market. And the buyer will be exactly the same ones who loved the EV-1--commuters who make a commitment to the techology. And as cost comes down and range increases the market will expand. And as far as the U.S. being the ones to do it, looks like the lights are going off in Detroit even as we speak.

I also agree that acceptance, at least in the U.S., will be slow, but due to the resistance of the corporate oligarchy and not the public. Unless we break the cycle of elected officials being mere tapeworms of the old men who run corporations, it will be a long time. Remember it was the oligarchy that killed the EV-1.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 110 (view)
 
Bio- Diesel, SVO, Electric, Hydrogen, Solar, Wind, Hybrids
Posted: 2/15/2007 9:55:37 PM
Hey, All:

Hey, Random: Yeah, I gather you are knowledgeable in such things, so I just wanted to point out to everyone the distinction between geothermal and earth-coupled.

Often we key on something someone has written, but while we may address the person, the message is usually meant for the whole audience.

I have come up against the geothermal/earth-coupled issue when I speak to people on sustainable dwellings, and since I am not a fan of the large-scale, capital-intensive, electricity-as-commodity geothermal phenomenon, but do find the earth-coupled heat pump to have some merit, I have a hard time resisting the urge to dive in.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 175 (view)
 
Long hair on older women
Posted: 2/15/2007 11:04:35 AM
Hey, all:

I am sure someone will arbitrarily categorize me for this, but I simply prefer longer hair on any woman. It just looks more feminine and attractive to me that way. When I see a woman in my age range, longer hair certainly is an attractive feature. And please, coloring hair is really not that attractive, as are all the other artificial changes so many women feel compelled to undergo.

Just long hair, simply and attractively styled, does wonders.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 103 (view)
 
Bio- Diesel, SVO, Electric, Hydrogen, Solar, Wind, Hybrids
Posted: 2/15/2007 9:22:15 AM
Hey, all:

Hey, Random Entry: If I may, I would like to clarify some more the 2 different pieces of technology.


What was referred to earlier has to do with actual geothermal power, in which seismic heat drilled down to at great depth is used to boil injected water, and the steam is allowed to come to the surface where it is used to turn turbines for electricity generation. This is extremely capital intensive, and it consequently depends on the electricity-as-commodity mentality. The expense also varies with the depth required to reach sufficient heat, so it is less practical with too much depth. There are thermal pollution concerns associated with the practice, but it is considered sustainable.

The other piece is what is properly referred to as a ground- or earth-coupled heat pump. Referring to it as 'geothermal' is a misnomer and should be avoided. A conventional air-coupled air conditioner is a one-sided one-way heat pump. It pumps hot air out of the living space and into the air. The visible "air-coupled" part is merely the blower fan outside. A heat pump is reversible, allowing heat to be moved into the living space. A ground- or earth-coupled heat pump simply uses a long loop of of tubing in the ground, either vertically or horizontally, which takes the place of the air blower fan. To cool, the earth-coupled heat pump pumps the heat out of the living space into the soil. To heat, it simply pumps the heat in the soil into the living space. It works because of the temperature stability of the soil.

An air-coupled heat pump is a study in inefficiency and diminished returns. When cooling, you are trying to pump heat out of the living space into air that is already warm. When heating you are trying to pump heat out of cooler air.
The earth-coupled heat pump works more efficiently because the temperature of the soil at a depth of ~8 ft is stable and approximately equal to the mean annual air temperature at the location. So if you live at high altitude or latitude, your MAAT is lower, and about the same temperature 8 ft down. My MAAT at 28 deg North is near 74 deg F. It is easy enough find out your MAAT from weather services.

Earth-coupled heat pumps are more energy-efficient because they only move heat, and don't actually have heating elements in them, using electricity or burning fossil fuels. But for the same reason they don't heat that well. They work best in a soil temperature range that allows both heating and cooling to work adequately.

By themselves, they have no sustainability qualities, but because they don't make heat as above, and are more efficient, they are more attractive to users who are interested in efficiency and conservation. Having a dwelling with a thermally efficient envelope makes it much more appropriate. Insulation and blocking air leaks is needed to make it work better.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 142 (view)
 
Our aging bodies
Posted: 2/14/2007 8:15:48 PM
Hey, all:

There certainly have been a lot of interesting, revealing thoughts here. My personal admiration to all--well, except for the needless trite chatting.

One of the few things we can't do ANYTHING about is gravity. BUT, we can help ourselves by not giving gravity so much to work with! Why have a lot of excess weight? Of course, right now I can imagine both a shower of curses hurled at me, and a LOT of excuses.

Point is, we all do have free will, and we--each of us--are all responsible for our own health and appearance, and to some extent, our longevity. If you don't care about your health. so be it. But, it is rather empty when someone complains about the result.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 28 (view)
 
environmentalists
Posted: 2/14/2007 6:15:39 PM
Hey, all:

Wow, this a great thread--works as a cool filter for me--I wish every woman would answer it! Hah!

Actually, as a long-time environmentalist, who walks the walk, I find I am not too terribly concerned about these things. Yeah, there are some things that are not as negotiable, but provided there is some balance of attractive qualities and negatives, and no real egregiously stupid behavior, oh, just as a sublime example, turning down the thermostat still the vents freeze, yet sleeping under an electric blanket turned up all the way. (Do they still HAVE electric blankets?) And I eat meat, but not exclusively, and I consume my own fruit and vegetables as long as I have them.

There are others things that are actually more important--smoking, ignorance, and a general disregard for a person's own health stand out. So even in my position, this is not an exhaustive list.

But I am certainly interested in hearing what women's boundaries are in this regard--one item not included is, would you be willing to live off-the-grid?

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 6 (view)
 
The marriage for children fallacy
Posted: 2/14/2007 2:28:43 PM
Hey, all:

Oh, man! This has to be a bad dream! Tell us you are kidding, Caffeine! You--you--you--feind, you!

This really sounds like the Fundamentalists need a lobotomy with a shovel. Of all the reactionary, Dark Age ignorance and idiocy and exclusionary politics and hypocrisy I have heard of, this has to be among the worst so far. There really needs to be a rollback to undo all the reiligion-driven erosions in personal and Constitutional freedoms.

Sadly the courts of the U.S. are often swayed by politics and institutional and corporate persuasion. The most egregious of these to date is probably the case that gave corporations the same protection as slaves freed under a U.S. Constitutional amendment! The Supreme Court was packed with corporate cronies and the result was and is predictable. Which emphasizes why U.S. Court nominations and appointments are so crucial. And in turn if there is an evil idiot stooge in the Presidency. Which brings us to impeaching the evil idiot stooge, who if not directly, certainly indirectly encourages numbskulls like the people in WA who are pushing this lame idea. I can only breath a sigh of relief it didn't come from Texas.

It will be interesting to see how this progresses.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 28 (view)
 
Blue eyes...
Posted: 2/12/2007 3:02:30 PM
Hey, all:

Hey, Laynee and Valencia: While I think you both have good ideas the answer still lies in natural selection and its subset called sexual selection. I also think it is incorrect to assume that only Western European cultures have the green, and blue eyes and the red and blong hair. The picture of the Afghan woman with the piercing haunting green eyes should disprove that notion. And unless there was interbreeding with Europeans I haven't heard about, there are aborigines in Australia with lighter features too.

The notion that it is only a high latitude issue is incorrect as well--people living on the tip of South Africa and South America for thousands of years should disprove that one. Add Eskimos, Inuits, Siberians, Mongols, etc.

Valencia, in your biology classes you learned about genetics and natural selection. Your answer does touch on some of the proximate reasons for lighter colors in humans but the ultimate answers are still in good ol' genetics and natural selection. By the way, hair and skin are part of the integumentary system and eyes are part of the sensory/nervous system--but all of them do interact with the endocrine system. And yes, melanin is a prominent dark pigment but all that is a result of natural selection and genetics.

There is a feature in natural selection called the founder effect, in which a population with a benign genetic trait somehow is isolated from the rest of the population. Laynee, your idea of the Vikings pickin' up redheads and marryin' 'em is not far from the mark as an illustration of this possibility.

The original question had to do with evolution. The full answer will be about a combination of natural selection and genetics, which built on what was called evolution and is now called the Modern Synthesis.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 3 (view)
 
Branson, Al Gore Team Up For Greenhouse Prize
Posted: 2/12/2007 9:36:10 AM
Hey, all:

In a big way, this is really just Methadone for the fossil-fuels industry. It allows them to continue, even perpetuate, their destructive habits and does little permanent good. Yes, there is
a need for a mechanism to reduce CO2 pollution, and soon, but to allow Big Oil and Big Coal to continue as they have is not a future we can sustain. And since the world's public at large are co-dependents along with Big Oil and Big Coal, it is part of our addiction, too.

I actually think this prize is more an exercise in public awareness than a real offer to award someone who can actually remove atmospheric CO2--it needs to be stopped at the source--just like a heroine addiction.

To express it another way, so we are going to add yet more energy-wasting technology to bandaid over other energy-wasting technology? Do we actually WISH to go downhill FASTER?

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 10 (view)
 
Who Killed the Electric Car - documovie -What if it was not dead
Posted: 2/12/2007 9:11:42 AM
Hey, all:

It seems that practically no one actually saw the movie, or bothered to find out anything about it, based on the glib, pat, erroneous responses here. Guess that doesn't prevent people from being ignorant, especially the naysayers and pro-fossil fuels buffoons. The fact is GM killed their own product: they and the American Petroleum Institute lobbied California politicians and had the statute repealed that mandated the EV-1. The dealer network in California also did not like the vehicle since it needed fewer repairs and they weren't making enough money off of it. Get used to this term: CORPORATE OLIGARCHY.

If one had seen the movie, one would know the owners were highly motivated to take care of the vehicles. If one had seen the movie, one would know the owners were greatly opposed to giving them up. If one had seen the movie, one would know the cars had quick acceleration, and were enjoyable to drive. If one had seen the movie, one would know the cars were used for commuting and local purposes. By the way, the title is a take-off on "Who Framed Roger Rabbit?" which dealt with the conspiracy by Detroit, Big Oil, and Big Rubber to kill off electric street cars used for urban mass transit.

There are some misconceptions about electric cars that need to be corrected. The biggest is that if the electrical energy source that is used to charge the cars is not sustainable, then the pollution caused is merely displaced from the point of use of the car to the location where the power plant is located. In fact, with transmission and conversion losses, there is actually a net increase in pollution if the source is not sustainable. So merely having electric cars does NOT reduce pollution.

However that is not the point of the questions here. Several things would have happened if the EV-1 had been allowed to continue. First, all the technology used to produce electric vehicles of all types would have all improved: this is the nature of technology and product and markets. Batteries would get lighter, smaller, more powerful, range of vehicles would increase, an infrastructure would develop to recharge/replace batteries on the road, price would come down as economy of scale took effect, greater markets would develop, and competition between manufacturers would increase. Second, other technologies would be promoted as alternatives to EVs, and by now we would be further along the path of sustainability and distributed generation. All of this is of course the opposite of what Detroit and Big Oil want, so it is not surprising they ended the EV-1.

The issue of pollution also needs to be addressed, and this can and will ultimately be done with sustainability and distributed generation. If you have the means of charging an electric vehicle in this way, as I do, you do your commuting, charge the vehicle at night, and repeat the next day. When we begin moving away from centralized big corporate-owned fossil-fuel-driven power plants and move toward sustainable sources, such as wind, PV, biomass and geothermal, and also to distributed generation, reducing pollution, transmission losses, illegal takeovers of foreign governments and improved security of energy sources, then we would actually see that CO2 pollution and anthropogenic climate change is being significantly reduced.

Regarding other questions asked, the events of recent years are too close together to have made a difference in actual measured anthropogenic climate change, but might have improved the public awareness of the issue. As far as invading Iraq, only NOT caving in to the pressure of the stolen 2000 U.S. election and permitting the evil, idiot, ignorant, arrogant,
sanctimonious, cheerleader, DUMB A S S Bush to take office would have avoided that. Those events ARE clear enough to know the implications of history.

As long as we continue to rely on the traditional technology of electricity-as-commodity, we will be stuck in this pattern of reliance on fossil fuels and all the pollution and hidden costs they carry with them. But, there is no need to wait--many many people have done it, years ago, continuing in the present, and growing in the future. I have been living happily off the grid for nine years, and I assist others in doing so. The EV-1 is another example of technology which was not given a proper opportunity because of politics. So goes the corporate oligarchy.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 111 (view)
 
Our aging bodies
Posted: 2/11/2007 9:25:29 PM
Hey, all:

Hey, Roxanne: It certainly seems we could be examples of near the extremes of philosophy of aging. I must say I find it very odd to essentially put an expiration date on your life, even if not entirely seriously, but in the end I do acknowledge it is your life.

There was a very very good PBS show several years ago with Bill Moyers on aging, and a woman and her mother in her late 80s were talking about the potential of easily living into our 100s. The mother looked at her daughter from her late-80s perspective and said "I don't recommend it".

I do encourage people to take care of themselves: we have many habits that interfere with good health, but I don't want it to be seen as an order, although there are still some significant benefits. It does not have to be drudge work, either. I do many things every day that are physical and never think twice about it because there is a different goal to focus on. I stay healthy more indirectly than actually work, although I still do lots of other stuff, including weightlifting and Yoga.

I remember that song from The Who who (or is that a misspelling of a female body part?) Hoohoo?--HAW HAW. Ironically another from that era was George Harrison who once said something similar about not caring about age, then when we was dying, tried everything he could to stay alive. You are right about perspective affecting the definition and connotation of words we use, but our perspective also changes with time, circumstance, and maturity.

Interesting that I at least encouraged you indirectly to take better care of yourself, and you said I "need" to read Hayakawa. There is some irony. Point is many of us encourage others to do things we believe will help them. And I may have read that or something else by him.

Like I said I admire stubbornness, since I possess it too, so good luck to everyone in all they do. And here's to a healthy life. And, uh, Eat Your Vegetables! Hah!!

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 200 (view)
 
Attack on Iran
Posted: 2/11/2007 6:40:51 PM
Hey, all:

Hah, way back on 24 July 2006, Rolling Stone had an article on the upcoming war with IRAN. I tell everybody talk to, Rolling Stone has some of the best politics and social reporting in any periodical. Of course, if what you want to do when you grow up is be a journal-tainment specialist, RS probably won't appeal to you. Some people are just pompous duplicitous clowns.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/10962352/iran_the_next_war

This is just the first of 6 pages, to get you intrigued enough to read the rest:


Iran: The Next War
Even before the bombs fell on Baghdad, a group of senior Pentagon officials were plotting to invade another country. Their covert campaign once again relied on false intelligence and shady allies. But this time, the target was Iran.

BY JAMES BAMFORD

How did the Bush administration sell the Iraq war? Check out our award-winning story on the PR machine for regime change in Iraq -- and join a reader debate: Is war with Iran unavoidable?

I. The Israeli Connection

A few blocks off Pennsylvania Avenue, the FBI's eight-story Washington field office exudes all the charm of a maximum-security prison. Its curved roof is made of thick stainless steel, the bottom three floors are wrapped in granite and limestone, hydraulic bollards protect the ramp to the four-floor garage, and bulletproof security booths guard the entrance to the narrow lobby. On the fourth floor, like a tomb within a tomb, lies the most secret room in the
$100 million concrete fortress—out-of-bounds even for special agents without an escort. Here, in the Language Services Section, hundreds of linguists in padded earphones sit elbow-to-elbow in long rows, tapping computer keyboards as they eavesdrop on the phone lines of foreign embassies and other high-priority targets in the nation's capital.

At the far end of that room, on the morning of February 12th, 2003, a small group of eavesdroppers were listening intently for evidence of a treacherous crime. At the very moment that American forces were massing for an invasion of Iraq, there were indications that a rogue group of senior Pentagon officials were already conspiring to push the United States into another war—this time with Iran.

A few miles away, FBI agents watched as Larry Franklin, an Iran expert and career employee of the Defense Intelligence Agency, drove up to the Ritz-Carlton hotel across the Potomac from Washington. A trim man of fifty-six, with a tangle of blond hair speckled gray, Franklin had left his modest home in Kearneysville, West Virginia, shortly before dawn that morning to make the eighty-mile commute to his job at the Pentagon. Since 2002, he had been working in the Office of Special Plans, a crowded warren of blue cubicles on the building's fifth floor. A secretive unit responsible for long-term planning and propaganda for the invasion of Iraq, the office's staffers referred to themselves as "the cabal." They reported to Douglas Feith, the third-most-powerful official in the Defense Department, helping to concoct the fraudulent intelligence reports that were driving America to war in Iraq.

Just two weeks before, in his State of the Union address, President Bush had begun laying the groundwork for the invasion, falsely claiming that Saddam Hussein had the means to produce tens of thousands of biological and chemical weapons, including anthrax, botulinum toxin, sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent. But an attack on Iraq would require something that alarmed Franklin and other neoconservatives almost as much as weapons of mass destruction: detente with Iran. As political columnist David Broder reported in The Washington Post, moderates in the Bush administration were "covertly negotiating for Iran to stay quiet and offer help to refugees when we go into Iraq."

Franklin—a devout neoconservative who had been brought into Feith's office because of his political beliefs—was hoping to undermine those talks. As FBI agents looked on, Franklin entered the restaurant at the Ritz and joined two other Americans who were also looking for ways to push the U.S. into a war with Iran. One was Steven Rosen, one of the most influential lobbyists in Washington. Sixty years old and nearly bald, with dark eyebrows and a seemingly
permanent frown, Rosen was director of foreign-policy issues at Israel's powerful lobby, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Seated next to Rosen was AIPAC's Iran expert, Keith Weissman. He and Rosen had been working together closely for a decade to pressure U.S. officials and members of Congress to turn up the heat on Tehran.

Over breakfast at the Ritz-Carlton, Franklin told the two lobbyists about a draft of a top-secret National Security Presidential Directive that dealt with U.S. policy on Iran. Crafted by Michael Rubin, the desk officer for Iraq and Iran in Feith's office, the document called, in essence, for regime change in Iran. In the Pentagon's view, according to one senior official there at the time, Iran was nothing but "a house of cards ready to be pushed over the precipice." So far, though, the White House had rejected the Pentagon's plan, favoring the State Department's more moderate position of diplomacy. Now, unwilling to play by the rules any longer, Franklin was taking the extraordinary—and illegal—step of passing on highly classified information to lobbyists for a foreign state. Unable to win the internal battle over Iran being waged within the administration, a member of Feith's secret unit in the Pentagon was effectively resorting to treason, recruiting AIPAC to use its enormous influence to pressure the president into adopting the draft directive and wage war against Iran.

It was a role that AIPAC was eager to play. Rosen, recognizing that Franklin could serve as a useful spy, immediately began plotting ways to plant him in the White House—specifically in the National Security Council, the epicenter of intelligence and national-security policy. By working there, Rosen told Franklin a few days later, he would be "by the elbow of the president."

Knowing that such a maneuver was well within AIPAC's capabilities, Franklin asked Rosen to "put in a good word" for him. Rosen agreed. "I'll do what I can," he said, adding that the breakfast meeting had been a real "eye-opener." Working together, the two men hoped to sell the United States on yet another bloody war. A few miles away, digital recorders at the FBI's Language Services Section captured every word.


There was a great large table in the print edition that shows a comparison of two sets of statements from BushCo. One was statements made about IRAQ and one was made about IRAN. All had the dates and who said them and the parallels were eeeeeeery. Some were word for word exact international political b u l l s h i t language applied to each country in turn. If you can find the print edition, it is worth getting just to see the comparison. But read it sitting down or over the toilet....for obvious reasons.

Surely, BushCo. and all the neo-con stooges like Doug Feith and Paul Wolfowitz think Iran is the enemy, which functionally makes them an enemy. Hell, yes, he would love to invade, to use all of the B-2s and F-117s we got, and make a real mess of Tehran and everywhere else the stupid evil warmongering mother f u c k e r s can think of.
David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 20 (view)
 
Women using less cosmetics[makeup]
Posted: 2/11/2007 2:35:09 PM
Hey, all:

Well, if I didn't live out the country in an area where it is hard to find me, I would be afraid of setting myself up for a drive-by shooting (oh, yeah, and I live at the end of a deadend, so "drive-BY" is a misnomer), but I must offer my wholehearted support for LESS or even NO makeup.

In all the situations when I have been intimate with a woman, I can't think of a single time when I didn't appreciate a woman's appearance more without makeup than with it. I even have in my profile that the ideal woman i.e., any woman, looks best right out of the shower. More than any so-called 'natural look', actually looking natural is far better. If I have gone to bed with a woman and awakened with her, man, to me she looks far better in the morning than last night. None of this 'coyote ugly' for me, and a big part of that has to do with lack of makeup--so unpleasant surprises.

Another issue has to do with confidence, which is a big attractor for me. Why do women feel they have to wake up and put someone else's face on? I think the answer has to include cultural pressures, i.e., marketing, but it also has to include lack of confidence.

Still another point has to do with the phenomenon of seeing a woman whose face is a different color from her neck and shoulders--always lighter and whiter. To me this is such a jarring distraction, it makes it harder to focus on the important things like character and substance.

When I kiss a woman's lips I want to kiss a woman's lips, not her lipstick. I simply don't want to kiss makeup.

The last thing I will say has to do with honesty--being who we are and what we are. Isn't this important? "I yam what I yam, and that's all that I yam." -- Popeye the Sailor.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 105 (view)
 
Our aging bodies
Posted: 2/11/2007 12:46:56 PM
Hey, all:

Gee, Roxanne, I guess you could have been quoting me, since I said, earlier and more than once, everything you refer to and even more, but that is not my precise writing style.

I see that you are an unabashed smoker so that explains the response and the defensiveness. There is a woman whom I love and whom I almost married (a separate story) who smoked for many years, who now (at 52) realizes the consequences of the habit.

There is some damage that smoking causes that can't be undone and some potential damage yet to be revealed. Smoking has been clearly clearly clearly linked with aging. It has been linked just as clearly with reduced health and reduced life expectancy.

Like I have also said before, I have good reason to expect to live to 95, and I don't want to grieve a series of women I love who died early because, for all their lovely qualities, didn't take good care of themselves. Aging poorly may have a genetic component, which can only be helped but not eliminated, but a big part of aging is how we take care of ourselves.

It is your life--and I applaud your stubbornness, but I think it is misguided. As I said in an earlier message, call me your Dutch uncle for my bluntness, but there you have the cold facts.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 9 (view)
 
Just When You Thought You Were Alone With Your Thoughts....
Posted: 2/11/2007 11:16:28 AM
Hey, all:

Yeah, Panagonia, I find this to be very troubling. First of all, the ethics of interfering and intercepting a person's thoughts bring back "Minority Report" but even more, "1984", and all the other totalitarian futures.

The glimmer of potential is going to get a lot of people pushing this forward, with little considerations of the consequences. Gets back to something I say again and again, based on Michael Crichton's line in "Jurassic Park", paraphrasing, 'we are so focused on 'can we', no one is asking 'should we' '.

What we now have, though, is just a gross general picture of intent, without any detail or resolution--more a matter of 'I feel violent' rather than, 'Tonight I am going to steal this car and rob that store'. A long way to go before we have any detail.

There are far more important fields of research in psychology, such as why some people become addicted, why some allow abuse, why some commit abuse, why some achieve more while others struggle, what is the nature of meditation, what is the benefit of altruism, how to cure/prevent developmental problems, the role of nutrition in psychology, and on and on and on.

Sadly, though, this field will go forward based on a psychological need to control others--another field more deserving of progress than what we are thinking.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 17 (view)
 
Thermal engine, what do I do with it?
Posted: 2/10/2007 12:26:13 PM
Hey, all:

Hey Dano: The advice given earlier that you need to do a patent search is by far your best here. You need to be extremely careful but diligent in finding out what existing patents there are, how they relate to your work, what the conflicts are, how yours is unique, etc. Once you have done all your own homework, you should find the most reputable patent attorney around, since trust and integrity is extremely important, and get them to verify and extend what you have done. Confidentiality is crucial and it has to be on paper, and you need to be confident in the process.

Another step is to make sure your claim for your engine is valid. Yes, you think so but that doesn't matter a goddam bit if it doesn't stand up to outside objective analysis. Again, you need someone with a long record of integrity behind them.

All these steps provide you with the security that your engine is protected for yourself, and it tells investors you are serious and have covered all the steps. This makes it easier to attract and secure the funding needed to get into business. They don't want to lose their investment anymore than you do.

I also think you are pretty much wasting your time here. You need much more professional help than you will find here to get where you want to go.

Be very careful but also be very diligent. These steps can be time-consuming and not cheap, but done properly you could be well ahead.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 276 (view)
 
What triggers you to run...
Posted: 2/9/2007 3:13:36 PM
Hey, all:

I think the thing that gives me hives and makes me dash for the door is when a woman implies suggests or demands that I change. I am nobody's goddam fixer-upper, and someone who expects you to change for them must be highly arrogant, self-centered, or narcissistic, or all three. It is no less than emotional blackmail, and a conditional love that has no place in a healthy relationship. Those who practice this behavior must be blind in order to do so.

I have said this many times before--change is bull s h i t. Growth on the other hand, is very different and a worthy goal. If two people can grow together simultaneously or at a comfortable pace for both, even better.

Worst words on the planet: "If you love me, you'll...."

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 86 (view)
 
Bio- Diesel, SVO, Electric, Hydrogen, Solar, Wind, Hybrids
Posted: 2/9/2007 9:21:23 AM
Hey, all:

Below is a link for two files from Home Power magazine. One of them explains electricity use and conservation and efficiency in a residential setting and the other is a spreadsheet in Excel, to use in calcuating and reducing energy waste and cost.

I use and recommend these two items to homeowners who wish to benefit from conservation and efficiency. Remember every $1 spent on conservation and efficiency saves $5 in sustainable energy system cost. When many realize the savings they can achieve, some giggle like kids. Some curse the money they have wasted over 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 years. For those who are interested in sustainability and go ahead and purchase and install their own system, they either smile like an early Zen student who has solved his/her first koan, or they tell the electric utility complany to go f u c k themselves. When I got into sustainability and installed my own system, I did all of them. With clients and friends, I still do 'em.

http://www.homepower.com/magazine/downloads_past_articles.cfm

Look for "Load Calculation Articles" and "Load Calc. Spreadsheet" The first is a .pdf file and the second is an .xls file.

The more determined and conscientious and detailed you are when using these related files, the more you will learn and the more you will save. And similar to a health monitoring program, it is a good idea to do it periodically.

You can also browse through all the other files shown here and on other pages of the Home Power site for many other useful articles on many of the topics in this thread.

There is persistent blind myth that sustainability is either unattainable or still in the future. The myth is just that--a myth, and as myths go, it rationalizes inaction and obstructs progress.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 223 (view)
 
Impeachment is imperative ...
Posted: 2/8/2007 12:26:20 PM
Hey, all:

Yes, impeachment is imperative. BUT, CONVICTION IS ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL. Someone wrote earlier that the case has to be airtight, but even with that, there has to the political will and the votes to convict the goddam stooges.

OTHERWISE, this will look like, and be portrayed as, nothing more than a weak attempt at retribution for the failed attempt to convict Clinton.

Without conviction all the fine proof offered here is useless. I believe therefore there is no one who has the political courage, legal knowledge and skill, and determination to do it.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 21 (view)
 
Just throwing this out there...
Posted: 2/7/2007 8:37:24 AM
Hey, all:

Gee, such an unabashed lack of a moral compass. Yeah, you have a right to be here, I suppose--what you are doing is not criminal, and as the lovely Squirrly says, a lot of people here are married. But in terms of morality and honesty to yourself and your spouse, you are standing on 2 BIG blocks of Jell-O, those are on quicksand, and--what's that I hear?--an earthquake/ volcano/tsunami/18-wheeler, coming right down on you. Get my point? Morally, you might as well be in space for all the solid footing you have.

Wanna be honest? Get divorced. That way, if you want a long-term relationship, being married won't be the reason for any broken hearts. And at least you will be honest with yourself. And, your husband may be fvcking miserable, too. Give him a break.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 17 (view)
 
Is it more important to be happy with yourself or healthy?
Posted: 2/7/2007 5:38:21 AM
Hey, all:

Hey, Kissme: Gee, I was just about to jump all over the title of the thread here, since it is such an artificial choice. Having to choose between the two doesn't make any sense. But I see that several have offered a correction.

What is important is that we be happy with ourselves and be healthy. We don't have to have just a little of each. We can be fully happy and full healthy. We can take great pleasure in honest work that keeps us fit, instead of mindless sweating on a treadmill or doing aerobics. We can even do aerobic exercise and keep our minds occupied. We can eat well and not have to feel like we are cheating ourselves. We can do many things that help us be happy and healthy.

We would all do better to lose the artificial choices that the title here suggests. It rilly rilly don't have to be that way.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 24 (view)
 
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 7:32:56 PM
Hey, all:

As has been pointed out in the Forum Violations thread, there is another thread that has a tenuous connection to this one. However the ONLY shared feature is the HPV vaccine. But since it PREDATES the POLITICAL events we have been referring to, it cannot be redundant--unless someone has a time machine. Someone's bias and duplicity is showing. Someone may want to move to that thread and leave this one to the politics of the issue. Attempting to conflate the 2 is typical and disingenuous.

The issue of the erosion or abandonment of democratic principles and the growth of the corporate oligarchy is one that has been constantly present for generations and covers a huge range of daily life, far beyond medicine or any single issue. One Big Picture issue is this closer and closer cooperation between business and government. A simple example of the corporate oligarchy is wrapped up in supposed efforts to "shrink the size of government". One way they attempt to achieve this is to privatize a host of traditionally government services, and elected and non-elected government and private industry share the profits.

Among many facets is privatization of the "corrections" industry. I invite everyone to look up "Corrections Connection", where you will find a resource used by the fast-growing private for-profit jail industry. Why is a there a War on Drugs? Occupants for jails. Higher and more extreme jail sentences? More occupants for jails. Why are funds for drug rehabilitation cut? Repeat occupants for jails. We all know the first rule of business: "a successful business is built on repeat customers".

Defense, medicine, food, petrochemicals, energy, jails, manufacturing--all are corrupted by the cooperation of government and business. This is the subject of the thread--the corporate oligarchy in whatever form it takes. That is the BIG Picture. We can do much better than this.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 15 (view)
 
Your thoughts on nuclear power...
Posted: 2/6/2007 6:32:30 PM
Hey, all:

Just one? Sure I can work within that restraint. What do I not like about nuclear energy? One thing--the entire phenomenon, from top to bottom, cradle to grave, start to finish.

I'll start with minding the ore, which requires large volumes of hot water requiring its own energy source, which is then discharged, containing levels of contaminants, polluting ground and surface water.

The construction of nuclear power plants is a huge, costly, resource sucking, extremely long, environmentally destructive process.

The operation puts out an enormous volume of thermal waste, requiring still more water, in an entirely different place, to absorb the thermal waste.

The cost of the commodity produced by nuclear power plants, electricity, will continue to rise as all the above environmental concerns force higher and higher expenses to correct them. It is a neverending process, which will result in neverending increases.

IT IS NOT RENEWABLE!! This is a huge fallacy--similar to the fallacy committed when the forests of North America were first viewed. Similar to the fallacy when petroleum was first discovered. Similar to the fallacy committted when nuclear power for electricity was first proposed. Try this one simple test--mine all the Uranium--WAIT FOR IT TO RENEW ITSELF. JUST WAIT. JUST WAIT. This is a corporate-political-rhetorical-public relations-spin doctor-snow job. Those who repeat it are free, unwitting shills. Call up, recite, and try to apply all the math and statistical wizardry you wish, courtesy of the spin doctors--but then go out, mine all the goddam Uranium, and wait for it to renew itself.

The waste of nuclear power plants is a huge problem which has no solution. Transporting wastes 4/5 of the way across the country to Yucca Mountain is a prescription for stupidity--as if we all would WANT to be stupid. No one should be burdened with dealing with someone else's waste. The environment should not be burdened with our stupidity--a lesson yet to be learned.

The only sustainable source of energy we have and can count on is fusion--fortunately the only needed reactor is 93 million miles away. And the largely benign result of the fusion is sunlight, and indirectly, green plants, and wind. These are sustainable.

The cost of nuclear energy would be far better applied putting PV panels on people's houses and businesses--and with a vastly better, far more widespread, sustainable, and egalitarian, return on the investment.

I hope to Gawd we do not go down this bad road of buying into this 60-year-old boondoggle. GE, Bechtel, Westinghouse, and many other members of the corporate oligarchy are the ones behind the scheme and have been since the start. Those who are free shills, shame on you.

And at the same time, proponents of nukes, praising its lack of contribution to anthropogenic climate change (while some of the same people deny the reality of anthropogenic climate change!), want to use the energy to extract oil from the oil sands!?! Combined hypocrisy and folly, pure and simple.

Just one? Sure!

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 SoTexMan
Joined: 8/23/2005
Msg: 22 (view)
 
Corporate Oligarchy, Big Pharma, Merck, Texas: Coming to a State/Province Near YOU?
Posted: 2/6/2007 5:11:42 PM
Hey, all:

Hey, Panagonia: Fortunately there have been waves here in Texas. It has been in the news since it was announced, and by the way, it surprised everyone but Merck and the little inside clic involved. A Republicanm State Senator Nelson, chair of a pertinent committee to the issue, has spoken up about it. The 'Ledge', as Texans dryly refer to the State Legislature, is planning hearings. And, as you mention, the usual parents groups, including the one in the story from the Austin American-Statesman, are up in arms about it. Some are appealing to the State Attorney General for a ruling, but he apparently has already ruled that students in private schools can not as such opt out of the vaccine.

I guess it is a 'done deal' for now anyway, in Texas, but the Big Picture has nothing to do with the vaccine, as I have said, but about the creeping abandonment of democratic process for greed. As far as I am concerned, it is another lie of the so-called 'conservatives' in power. The name of this is corporate oligarchy.

I have been trying to find out what other states in the U.S. have had legislation rejected. This is apparently one reason why this corporate end run was done. $60 million in Texas, compared to other states' populations, X all 50 states? There is the calculation that illustrates the greed. As someone pointed out and as some news stories will illustrate, Merck's balance sheet appears to look rather weak, also providing motive for the end run.

I am still wondering if there is any similar legislation--or governmental corruption--in other U.S. states or Canadian provinces.

David


Messages done with sustainable energy, with Wind and Sun!
 
Show ALL Forums