Show ALL Forums
Posted In Forum:

Home   login   MyForums  
 
 Author Thread: Sober
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 25 (view)
 
Sober
Posted: 8/22/2012 2:08:56 PM

LMFAO Ok strange man your a funny guy I actually have tried ballroom dancing and its ok but it def isn't my thing I like to surf LOL .
Funnily enough, the only surfer I know, is a Irish girl who loves doing ballet, and salsa dancing.

Its acceptable to surf. Then go drinking.
Its a lot harder to justify drinking if you're going to be doing technically challenging dances, fire poi, swordfighting, driving, juggling knives, unicycling or playing competitive chess late at night. But I know which of those options I'd point out as being obvious places to meet girls.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 23 (view)
 
Sober
Posted: 8/21/2012 5:22:35 PM

It's great you are sober but you are a smoker and that will turn off more people. You say you like to hang out in bars to shoot pool or sing silly songs but you expect someone you date to go to those bars with you and not have one drink? I think you need to get control of your own life and not put YOUR restrictions on other people. Like I said, you smoking is going to be a big turn off to a lot of people. Suppose you aren't ready to quit smoking? You want someone that doesn't want a smoker to change because you can't control your urges for cigs? Not everyone that drinks socially needs to attend AA meetings. Some of us can control our intake and drink responsibly and not be fall down drunk by the end of the night. Not everything has to be an extreme of all or nothing.


First: Theres something wrong with you if you can't go to a bar and stay off booze. They sell other, totally non-alcoholic drinks, like coke to let people do exactly that.
Second: His restrictions are on who he will date. It is acceptable (regardless of the nicety) to say "I will not date you because you smoke/drink/eat meat/ride horses/are blonde."
Third: "Not everyone that drinks socially needs to attend AA meetings. Some of us can control our intake and drink responsibly and not be fall down drunk by the end of the night. Not everything has to be an extreme of all or nothing." He never once claimed that, which makes me wonder why you even brought it up. - If a social (that is someone who only drinks in other people's company) drinker is out 4 nights a week and has, lets say, 3-4 glasses of wine each time then we're taking between 3 and 5 bottles of wine, per week. Its not enough to get most people falling down drunk, but it is enough to make them over the drink driving limit for over 10 hours (depending on location), and cause liver damage.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 22 (view)
 
Sober
Posted: 8/21/2012 4:21:03 PM
The best advice anyone is likely to give you, is to try a hobby that does not mix well with alcoholism.

I would recommend an activity where you need coordination to avoid falling on your bum, which takes place during prime drinking time. - Some forms of latin and ballroom dancing are obvious ones. Salsa, jive, tango leap out at me as being drink-unfriendly activities, because you don't want to fall over (at least two forms of salsa, and jive), and you don't want to get tangled up with someone who is drunk enough to crush your genitals (tango).
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 127 (view)
 
Can I buy you a drink?
Posted: 8/10/2012 2:26:06 PM

People are saying that she is selfish for accepting the drink, but why does the guy have to even offer it? Is he incapable of having a conversation unless she is obligated to converse by accepting his unsolicited drink?
Suppose he is very bad at conversation, being shy, introverted or just plain bad at random conversations with strangers.


If she's not interested, that's not going to change just because he bought her a drink, and now he's out money and got his hopes up.
There is a world of difference between "not interested in him" and "barely noticed him". She may not even have noticed him until he asked to buy her a drink.

Now, if she knew that she was "Not interested", she didn't have to take the drink, she could have walked immediately.


What is the difference between striking up a conversation, and having the same conversation as a string attached to the drink? If a guy wants to talk to a woman, man up and talk to her.
The difference is that if you start a conversation, YOU have to start it. Offering to buy someone a drink invites them to start it, and bearing in mind that the guy we're talking about is "very bad at conversation, being shy, introverted or just plain bad at random conversations with strangers", do you think he's going to know how to start a conversation, bearing in mind the guy's probably thinking something explicit about your appearance?


If they're going to think that a woman owes them something for said drink (and what is the ante? A few minutes' conversation? The entire evening? Sex? It could go on, some guys actually think they own you and are going home with you after buying you one drink, and you can't get rid of them), and get pissy because they didn't get the expected ROI, then don't buy them one.
If you don't like men like that, stop going to the places where the men are like that.


It's perfectly reasonable to strike up a conversation with someone without attaching strings or thinking they owe you something. I'd rather someone talked to me because they actually wanted to, not out of pity or obligation because I bought them a drink.
People can only CHOOSE to converse with you, if they've actually considered you. Offering to buy someone a drink forces them to consider you.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 118 (view)
 
Can I buy you a drink?
Posted: 8/10/2012 1:23:36 PM
Oh, and another thought just occurred to me.

Maybe Panera guy bought your lunch for you to impress someone ELSE, kind of a "Hey, you, pretty waitress. I think nothing of money and oh look I'm kind!"
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 117 (view)
 
Can I buy you a drink?
Posted: 8/10/2012 1:18:44 PM

What kind of EXTRA gratitude exactly?? They are strangers to each other! I mean "Thanks/thank you" isn't good enough?? I see the POINT of your argument but honestly, that example is weak at best....


I don't mean EXTRA gratitude.

"Thanks", on its own could be sarcastic, faked or genuine. Saying "Thanks" and walking away smacks of all sorts of unpleasant things.
"Thanks, thats very kind of you, whats your name?", and giving him a little bit of attention, is more likely to make him feel good about buying her a drink, and for any other guys watching/hearing about it, makes her sound a lot friendlier, less manipulative and more approachable - and thats a good thing right?


A few months ago I was at Panera by myself. I ordered, went to pay and noticed I had left my credit card at home. There were ppl in line behind me and I was mortified! A nice man in a suit stepped up and offered to pay for my lunch...I was surprised and very grateful, thanking him sincerely . He didn't stop to chat me up or ask if I'd sit with him, he just smiled, said "you're welcome" and moved on. The kindness of strangers indeed....
Massively different scenario.

Let me suggest this: The guy was in a rush to cut lunch short so he could get back to work, so he paid for your cheap lunch to stop him getting stuck in a queue for longer than he could afford. His buying you lunch could so easily have been motivated by greed, impatience and disregard for the value of $10.

What possible reason could the bar guy have had for wanting to buy your friend a drink, that didn't involve her giving him attention, and how likely do you think those reasons are?
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 95 (view)
 
Can I buy you a drink?
Posted: 8/10/2012 3:33:02 AM

No kidding.

I wouldn't have accepted the drink myself, I don't like the feel of leading people on. That's exactly why I have never done the 'free dinner' style date that many of my female friends encouraged me to do over the years. But this woman accepted his offer of a drink, said thank you and shortly after went back to the table where her friends were. So what? I honestly don't see how that makes her manipulative, classless, stupid, a b!tch or any of the other ludicrous adjectives heaped upon her. I may not have done what she did, but I'll defend her right to do so without this ridiculous and extreme prejudice for such an innocuous thing.


So, to you, people who accept kindness from a stranger without demonstrating any gratitude, aside from a "thanks!", are not classless?
So, to you, people who accept a drink from a strange man, knowing full well that he wants to start a conversation with her, take the drink and walk away aren't manipulating the scenario for their own benefit?
So, to you, people who accept a drink from a strange man and don't realise that he wants to start a conversation, aren't stupid, or at the very least socially inept?

You can't have it all really, and there is no way I can think of that would allow me to say that her behaviour in this situation was laudable.

Nobody is challenging her RIGHT to be a low class, manipulative, self-centred ****. To deny that is how she acted in this situation is dishonest. She can be any of those things if she wants, but don't expect people to encourage it or like it.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 77 (view)
 
Can I buy you a drink?
Posted: 8/9/2012 10:30:54 AM
Ok, lets go through the entire assumed conversation.

Man - Hi, can I buy you a drink? - subtext: I want to talk to you and get to know you.
Woman - Yes please! - subtext: A free drink from someone I can blow off!
Barman takes the order
Man - "So whats your name?" - Subtext: I'm trying to start a conversation
Woman - "Cassandra." - Subtext: Hurry up barman, I want a free drink.
Man - "Where are you from?" - Subtext: are you incapable of conversation?
Woman - "10 miles thataway" - Subtext: Get it into your head that I'm not interested you xxxx
Man - .... - Subtext: Talk to me!
Barman returns with the drink
Woman - "Thanks" - Subtext "Thanks sucker"

So, this woman can be easily observed to be lacking in class, opportunistic, ungracious and probably arrogant.

She sounds like someone I don't want to know.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 6 (view)
 
Ready to Throw in the Towel
Posted: 8/9/2012 9:39:48 AM

Any thoughts on what I should do, keep my head up and keep dating or take a break????

Treat it like a problem to be solved.

Step 1 - Figure out whats going wrong.
Step 2 - Figure out how to change it.
Step 2a - Decide which solution to use
Step 3 - Put what you figured out into action.
Step 4 - Realise that whatever action you take will not make everything perfect in one go.

Heres a silly worked example:

Step 1 - Define the problem: You're sick of dating overactive men who wear you down.
Step 2 - Define the solutions: Solutions: Stop dating overactive men. Hunt down obviously lazy men to date them. Spend more time at places where you expect the less active men to be. Take up fishing so you can tell your over-enthused date to shut up and let you concentrate on the fish for a few hours.
Step 2a - Pick a (set of) solution(s): Decide to take up fishing
Step 3 - Put into action: Take up fishing
Step 4 - You meet someone whilst fishing. His hobby is to go and sit with some snacks and drinks with a fishing rod. He's not overactive. PROBLEM SOLVED. Or.... You end up stinking of fish and never get another date.

See how the process works?
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 222 (view)
 
Atheism and Dating
Posted: 8/3/2012 8:36:46 AM

If my beliefs appear delusional to someone, why would they want to date me? It's not like I hide who I am and what I think/believe in that respect.

And seriously, why would a lack of agreement automatically equate to mockery? Rather telling logic there...
Your religious beliefs do not define everything about you. They do not dictate if you are good company, they do not dictate if you are pretty, they do not dictate your sense of humour, your religious beliefs are NOT normally the single largest criterion for a guy who is trying to figure out if he wants to date you.

A lack of agreement doesn't automatically equate to mockery. A lack of agreement opens up the possibility of mockery, and the larger the disagreement, the larger the possibility.

Is it easier to mock someone who follows Zen Buddhism, or someone who has based their religion on flying moon cows that ride pink unicorns to go and visit Tom Cruise for the universe's sexual olympics, and who decide who runs the illuminati based on who has smallest schlong? - If you're anything like me, you're more likely to mock the people believing in the more outlandish and ridiculous things - like flying moon cows that ride unicorns!!!
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 217 (view)
 
Atheism and Dating
Posted: 8/3/2012 12:37:59 AM

I've dated atheists before, and I always ended up feeling mocked. It didn't lend itself to a feeling of warmth and closeness, nor acceptance. After this I swore I would never date another atheist, but that was needlessly closed minded and an atheist friend of mine challenged my thoughts in that regard. Not all atheists are created equal after all.

But I admit to being more interested in men who are open to the spiritual as opposed to being all blocked off. It seems to have side effects in other areas as well. I can see it working for those who do not consider this sphere all that important, but for those who spend a lot of time devoted to spiritual pursuits or debating the ultimate superiority of their position.. well, problems would likely loom on the horizon.
I think the reason you've ended up feeling mocked is that you probably believe in a great many things which haven't been explained in scientific terms, and since many atheists tend to require scientific evidence, it becomes hard for them to accept a logically built up structure of beliefs, when the foundations of those beliefs are unsound. - From that point of view, would you agree that your beliefs can be seen as delusional?


It is a wonder that the either strong atheists or strong religious can ever have a serous long term relationship at all...

For strong religious a relationship is a meeting under God and who one can live up to that expectation
For strong atheists there is no such thing as a permanent love beyond self. if no one cares whats the point anyway.

A meeting under god, is not a meeting WITH god, so its easy to maintain provided the people in the relationship have a very similar view of god.
For atheists, it is possible to have a permanent love, because they care, not some third party in the sky...

Oh, and let me ask you this one, direct question. If god exists, then what is your real evidence to prove that he isn't just some big kid torturing us like insects, or a scientist experimenting on us, a benevolent figure in the sky?
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 25 (view)
 
Why do guys even bother going on dates when they seem instantly bored/burned out
Posted: 7/27/2012 12:12:44 PM

Also there's no verbal diarrhea going on when I converse, I am an artist and very sensitive to people's body language, I can tell when someone is bored, getting squirmy, disinterested or just not into it. On the other hand, it is also very evident when they ARE interested! I am extremely careful not to ramble on, overdo anything, and I quickly and politely end things and move on with zero "where are you?" phone calls or any of those annoying strings men hate.


I have noticed that most people like discussions to be a bit airy fairy, not really to the point, and to take the long way round to the obvious answer - I've noticed this even in business meetings full of engineers/scientists/programmers. I consider a lot of those meetings to have verbal diarrhea, maybe I have a much stricter definition of that term than most, but it is a subjective thing where your interpretation of the term defines one thing, and for someone else, it will cover some of the same things, and some things that you consider reasonable conversation.

You're an artist, by your own admission, I have not noticed any kind of tendency by artists to be direct and to the point in relaxed conversation. You are probably more interested in espousing and defending crackpot theories that the two-toed sloth inspired Jackson Pollock for a few years before he realised that it wasn't a possum, than having short and direct conversations.

I think that if we were to have a conversation over a cup of something hot, that you would walk away with the impression that I was bored and disinterested, because lets face it, thats probably how I would feel about the randomly chosen mundane topic of conversation, but that doesn't necessarily mean that I would be bored with or disinterested in YOU.


If a man wants me gone, it is done!
What if you think he wants you gone, but he actually doesn't? Would you still be gone?

If you had a coffee with me you'd probably jump to the conclusion that I want you gone, and be gone even though it might not be what I want.


This is a social interaction, and I have an obligation to be polite, listen to and try to get on his energy level, not talk about myself thru the entire date and allow him room to talk, interact, or want to leave.
No, you don't.
You appear to have accepted one particular code of behaviour, which to be fair is in common use, and mistaken it for something which you MUST adhere to. Its not.

If you meet a guy for the first time and he notices that your hair is smelly (and not in a good way), would you prefer that he says something like "ooh stinky hair", (a lot of people consider this impolite) then acts as if he doesn't mind (but really does), or a guy who doesn't say it, but acts uninterested because your hair stinks (which, funnily enough, IS polite)?
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 10 (view)
 
Why do guys even bother going on dates when they seem instantly bored/burned out
Posted: 7/27/2012 12:03:08 AM
They bother because they want someone.

I continually notice people on this sight confuse uncommunicative for uninterested. As an introvert, I am not someone who likes talking continually about mundane topics, and in fact, doing so, or being forced to listen to someone who does so with what appears to be an phobia of silence is extremely offputting.

I suffer from other people's verbal diarrhoea.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 20 (view)
 
..where'd he go????
Posted: 7/3/2012 12:55:43 PM

1) Did I just get majorly played??????
2) Does he still get notifications even if he deleted himself?
3) Any suggestions on what to do next?

1. Probably.
2. how would the site know to give him notifications?
3. Get over him and move on.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 6 (view)
 
Scars... good or bad?
Posted: 6/30/2012 2:40:39 AM
So, I'm assuming that you're some kind of bodyguard, and you've been in a few violent incidents, and picked up quite a few scars from that.

Say that, and they'll either run screaming for the hills, or they'll accept it.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 12 (view)
 
What to do when not interested
Posted: 6/9/2012 8:12:57 AM
You need to bear in mind that you're rejecting them.

Theres many ways to do it.

You can be honest and say exactly why you're rejecting them, but that puts most people on the defensive, especially if they don't agree. - It is very easy to see "I don't like x guys", and read it as "oh my god, you're pathetic for x".
You can lie and say "you seem nice, but you're too late, I just met someone."
You can be monosyllabic and restrict yourself to only answering questions, and never asking them of people you are not interested in.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 61 (view)
 
Date sites and self esteem
Posted: 6/6/2012 12:34:22 AM

Ohhh the irony of the first sentence of your profile
It seems you do have the concept down pat,
you just can't seem to believe it.
Pfft, you're mistaking sales bullcrap for the genuine belief that I can think I'm fantastic/awesome/brilliant. If you must know, I'm a cynical pessimist that continually gets reminded as to how stupid most people are. The kind of people I work with continually do so too.


That's just silly.Why would you date someone to spare thier feelings of rejection if you weren't attracted or compatible with them?
Every woman I've dated so far is incompatible with me. Do you know how I know they're incompatible? Its because I dated them. And theres a big difference to having someone in your life, which is what you actually asked, and dating them.

@providence, put the sarcasm aside, it doesn't help your position. We weren't talking about the odd insult. We were talking about continuous negative reinforcement.
Negative reinforcement, sustained for long periods of time, has driven people to depression and suicide.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 40 (view)
 
Date sites and self esteem
Posted: 6/5/2012 3:31:50 PM

no, what I said was that thre was: ``On the flip side, if a woman doesn't appeal to me as a dating prospect, it's not because there's anything wrong with her, per se.''

The latin phrase, ``per se'' means, ``in itself.'' So a woman might not appeal to me, even though there's nothing inherently wrong with her,
I think we're arguing about semantics. When you originally said "wrong", you did not mean "not right for me", you actually meant "openly having something that makes her abnormal".

When I say wrong, I mean "not right for the rejector".
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 37 (view)
 
Date sites and self esteem
Posted: 6/5/2012 3:14:40 PM
@Providence, show me the studies that prove that continued positive reinforcement does NOT have benefits to confidence and self esteem, then maybe I'll take your statement seriously.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 30 (view)
 
Date sites and self esteem
Posted: 6/5/2012 1:39:53 PM

Don't misconstrue what I post and you won't find anything strange about what I said, unless the only thing you value in a woman is sex.


I still find it strange, after re-reading it several times.

You have stated that sometimes, you consider women that are not wrong in some manner, to not be dating prospects. Heres where I struggle.

If a woman is:

a. Sufficiently physically attractive
b. Sufficiently physically available
c. Sufficiently emotionally and personally attractive
d. Sufficiently emotionally and personally available

Then, they are, to me, dating prospects, I have no reason to say they aren't. Now, if a woman meets all four of those things, theres nothing wrong with them, if they don't meet all four of those things, then there is something wrong with them.


That, in part, I would venture to guess,is due to your own insecurities and self doubt.
If that is true, doesn't it tell you how ineffectual the advice is, given that it's intended to address those exact problems?


Let's say you contact someone.
They see you in that Kilt and think....Umm..I don't think so.
For whatever reason they are not attracted to men in skirts.
Or men with Beards.Or men that are tall.....whatever it is...it's thier right to not be interested for whatever reason
Just like it's your right to have your own preferences.Doesn't mean they don't like you personally,they don't even know you.
Should you take thier preference personally?
The reason doesn't matter. It remains a rejection of ME.


Would you happily allow someone into your life to save them from feeling rejected even if you didn't find them attractive or compatible with you in one way or another? NO!
I have done so before. I will probably do so again.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 20 (view)
 
Date sites and self esteem
Posted: 6/5/2012 9:21:01 AM

Why should I take their disinterest personally? I don't even know them. I don't expect to appeal to everyone, so I'm not devastated by expressing interest in any particular woman who doesn't find me appealing for some reason. On the flip side, if a woman doesn't appeal to me as a dating prospect, it's not because there's anything wrong with her, per se.
She's just not appealing enough to be a dating prospect, but theres nothing "wrong" with her.

@HeartOn64

I read through that advice blog, unfortunately, it is all advice that I've heard before, and have found myself utterly incapable of following. I especially liked the section on "Reflect", and how close it comes to utterly contradicting advice it gives earlier in the article, and the clear and inherent assumption, flying in the face of other things it mentions in that article that people who are long-term single can actually figure out why they get rejected.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 6 (view)
 
Date sites and self esteem
Posted: 6/5/2012 4:40:18 AM

Does constant rejection help or hurt ones self esteem ?
Constant rejection can only hurt one's self esteem. Anyone who tells you otherwise is either lying, or a moron.


Why should dating be any different than anything else? Not getting a reply might be a disappointment, but there's no reason to take it personally.
Theres plenty of reason to take it personally. After all, all it communicates is "You are too insignificant/unimportant/deficient/boring for me to reply to you." That seems pretty personal to me.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 31 (view)
 
Never been in love??
Posted: 6/5/2012 3:21:14 AM

Met a guy on here... He seems pretty nice, but he has never been in love. This kind of struck me as odd. Do you think it's weird that a 33 year old man has never been in love? Do you think that it's a sign of this person not being capable of having these feelings. He has had relationships before, but he says he was never in love with any of them. How is that? After, hearing this, I have become skeptical about him. I'm wondering if he is even capable of becoming emotionally connected to someone. What are your thoughts?


I've never been in love. Thought I was once, turns out I was merely infatuated. Do I see myself falling in love in the next 4 or so years? I can't honestly say that I expect to find anyone I could fall in love with in that time frame. Do I see myself having short relationships with women that I'm physically attracted to, and initially emotionally attracted to? Yeah.

Am I capable of becoming emotionally connected to someone? Yes. Am I going to do it recklessly or quickly? No.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 1 (view)
 
Body language...
Posted: 6/5/2012 2:54:59 AM
I noticed the other day at work that I'd picked up a habit from some guy at work, and I'm curious as to what it says in terms of body language.

We both hooked our hands together above our heads (above, not behind), and then shifted the hooked hands to one side, placing the bicep of one arm against our ear. So, yeah, what does that communicate?
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 17 (view)
 
How can I become less self conscious?
Posted: 5/27/2012 11:24:24 AM
Its a performance art with dancing and optionally, singing or stripping.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 15 (view)
 
How can I become less self conscious?
Posted: 5/27/2012 9:43:27 AM

So does anyone have any tips for overcoming these type of feelings?
Its simple. Stop comparing yourself to professionally airbrushed, professionally good looking women, who have personal trainers and sycophants on call.

Also, given your preference for old school style, I think you should try taking up burlesque, there ought to be lessons in Reading. I personally know a few women (ok, 3) that do it, and from what I can see on your pictures, you're better looking than 2 of them.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 92 (view)
 
Has anyone dated someone with asbergers?
Posted: 5/16/2012 1:33:21 PM

it should not take rocket science to figure that out.
And if it did, most sufferers of aspergers would be able to learn enough rocket science to figure it out.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 4 (view)
 
Do you bother? ...
Posted: 5/16/2012 12:20:15 AM
If I'm not interested, the conversation dies out, because I do little to continue it.

Girl: "Hi how are you, I saw your profile and really liked it!"
Me: "Hi. I'm fine."
Girl: "Thats good."
Me: (Thinking, oh that doesn't need a reply, so, no reply.)

I think girls don't really realise that rejecting a guy is basically a statement that "You're not good enough for me.", and that a lot of guys look by the attempts to be "nice", because they "know" that what you mean is "Theres something about you I find hideous, weird and/or creepy."

A lot of guys want to be able to fix the problem, which makes you think that about them. Which means that they need to know what the problem is. Which is why they ask "why". Unfortunately most people can't say whats wrong with other people without giving offense, which is why so many people respond badly to it.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 18 (view)
 
Should I stick it out
Posted: 5/16/2012 12:10:56 AM

no man would send a woman away becuase they are "tired" if they were into them.

Wrong.

I've destroyed one or two relationships by continuing a conversation too long when I've been "tired". I now want to think that I'd be able to tell when to finish a conversation and recover from the tiredness so that I don't sabotage another.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 28 (view)
 
help i just was gifted with 25lb of basamati rice
Posted: 5/15/2012 2:34:47 PM
Indian food is the obvious way to use it.

Cold rice makes a good breakfast. Boil it the night before, and store it at room temperature, in a sealed container. If you think it needs flavour, add honey, ketchup, a chutney or any sauce you want.

A simple curry needs greek yoghurt (or any unflavoured yoghurt), mixed with spices, (turmeric, coriander, garlic, and chilli being the obvious ones), mix in some meat of choice (personally, I prefer beef or turkey, and I'm not fussy about blood mingling with the yoghurt; you might be, so you might want to brown the meat first), cover it, put it in the fridge and let it seep into the meat. A day or two is probably ideal. Mix in some finely diced/blended chilli peppers, tomato and onion with the marinated meat. Put it all in a pot and stew it for a good 45 minutes. (Or put it in a slo-cooker all day)

Obviously, you'll need to adjust the proportions to taste.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 24 (view)
 
Scotch Eggs
Posted: 5/15/2012 2:20:31 PM
The traditional scotch egg is a hard boiled egg, crapped in sausage meat, covered in breadcrumbs and deep fried.

Yesterday, I had one that used black pudding instead of sausage meat.
I've had some that used egg mayo instead of just egg.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 58 (view)
 
THE CHASE: Do guys really want the girl or the process?
Posted: 5/13/2012 12:50:01 PM
I have been told by the guys on here n one I know that man like to chase n they always want what they can have so u tell me

Most people want what they can't have. Having Marilyn Monroe whispering sweet nothings in one ear while the other gets licked by Cintia D1cker (a brazilian underwear/swimwear model) would be exactly what I want right now....

I don't like the chase; it translates to a lot of effort playing some strange game before you can even get to know if someone is the kind of person you'd want to get to know.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 23 (view)
 
Proposal
Posted: 5/12/2012 12:12:42 PM

What would you say to the mother/father of your child/ren if he/she proposed that you have another child together even though you were not currently together?
If I thought it meant that I'd get to have sex with them til they get pregnant, I actually wanted to have sex with them, and I was callous enough to think that whatever relationship I'd have with the kid(s) is what I want, then I'd say Yes. Otherwise, I'd say no.

I mean, for me, its what.... a few hours + nights out of my life doing something that is enjoyable?


What do you think the possible reasons for this would be?
That they want another kid.


Would you feel insulted?
No.


If I was a woman and a man asked me that, I would be horrified at the opinion they have of me/women. As a guy, its a few hours of effort, as a woman, its a few hours of effort followed 9 months of pregnancy, health issues, issues that sabotage any attempt at having a relationship/career for a long time, and then most likely having to raise another kid.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 33 (view)
 
Is it too much to want to speak on a phone???
Posted: 5/7/2012 5:00:37 PM

So youre saying it makes more sense to drive 3 hours so see if theres "chemistry" rather than speak on the phone to see if we can even hold a conversation.

Yes.

I know this may seem strange to you, but a lot of guys simply do not like talking into a plastic thing they need to hold at their ear and mouth. I know that I only phone people when I either need to get information, or give them information, not to have aimless conversation.

I find it a hell of a lot easier talking to people in person.
Its that simple.

If you can communicate online, and you have chemistry in person, does it really matter how you get on with each other on the phone? Methinks you're focussing on entirely the wrong thing, or putting unnecessary and badly thought out barriers up.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 17 (view)
 
Dislike of the Germans?
Posted: 5/6/2012 11:13:13 AM
I think much of it is because the girls (and guys) you're meeting are english, and have some german stereotypes in their head. Those stereotypes paint germans in a bad light, since most of those stereotypes come from being too businesslike (and boring), too authoritarian (the only joke about a german I can remember off the top of my head is about a german watchmaker. He made watches that only went tick, and he "had vays of making it tock"), and from starting the second world war.

On top of that, you've got a lot of english people talking to their grandparents who lived during the war.... and that can't be good for the image they have of germans.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 29 (view)
 
Please help me understand how texting works.
Posted: 5/6/2012 10:50:25 AM

I only went on a couple of dates with both of these guys on seperate occasions of course but can't figure out how these dates went well but then all of a sudden, both men were more and more not answering my texts. I totally believe if someone is busy they can take 5 seconds out of their life to text you back and let you know that. I also believe there is a chance a text was never received. It is too coincidental that both men ignored my texts on more than one occasion. I think that is way rude and it is a deal breaker for me. I feel if I am not good enough for courtesy or consideration than it is clear that you are proving to me that I am not worth it to you. I am not the kind of woman to continue to text and text and text over and over again just to get it response because that is riduculous. I am just and curious to know if this ignoring text messages is the new cowardly way to reject someone?


Being texted constantly is bloody irritating, and the irritation goes up a level when whoever I'm texting starts getting needy, worried, or panicked because I go out of touch for all of 30 seconds.

You are not the most important person in either of these men's lives. They've just slept with you (if my reading between the lines is accurate), and are probably wanting to regain a little bit of distance so the relationship doesn't just transform into something too serious and too deep. The fact you got angry enough to tell them to delete your number just tells me that you actually do want something more serious. The reason it tells me that is that it is the simplest answer to "why would it be a big deal?".



Nobody's obliged to kiss your ass.


starofgaia. I'm afraid I'm going to have to plagiarise that. ;)
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 22 (view)
 
Is it too much to want to speak on a phone???
Posted: 5/6/2012 6:09:40 AM

Anyways, today he talked about making plans and I said we should have a phone conversation and then he said we should just go straight to meeting. So I asked him how we would hold a converstion in person if we couldnt have one over the phone? He said I should try something different and thats why its great to "change"
You're more likely to have a conversation with me in person, than over the phone.

On the phone, if you're talking about something I couldn't care about (tatting lace, or about how that girl you've known for years and years and I haven't met keeps annoying you), my attention will wander, I will lose the thread of the conversation, I'll get bored. You won't be able to tell, because I'm not someone who makes noises when I'm listening unless I actually put mental effort into making those acknowledging sounds. I don't know how you'll react to that.

Lets say you're talking about something I do know and could fix in my sleep, Then I'll likely get frustrated that I can't just fix it, or better yet, SHOW you how to fix it.

So, telling me "problems", frustrates me, talking about inane stuff bores me and makes me tune out of the conversation, doing it for too long reminds me of my fat grandmother, AND it interrupts whatever I was doing if I get phoned.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 155 (view)
 
Atheism and Dating
Posted: 5/5/2012 8:11:53 AM

This thread is a good example of how atheists get in tehse little packs and try to mock and harass non-atheists. Meanwhile find me some threads where multiple Christians are in there bashign people. :)
Ha

Have you read this thread? Theres at least 3 "Christians" bashing people for being something other than Christian, and you're one of them. (For calling people who believe in science "irrational". ;) ) The level of doublethink that I've seen believers exhibit is sometimes quite astounding.

Any kind of detailed study into various Christian churches will reveal a history of persecution, and treating people like shit, so stop pretending that Christianity makes people peaceful. It has made multiple generations of conflict. It has made war on people who believe slightly differently. It has been cause for persecution of entire nations of people. It has been the excuse for a multitude of wars. It has been the cause for such ridiculous things as the salem witch trials.

You might choose to deny many of those things by saying "but they weren't really christians", but that smacks of doublethink.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 18 (view)
 
ok am i a lesbian because of this?
Posted: 5/2/2012 11:45:19 PM
i have never felt comfortable around guys,
Thats the problem right there. You spent most of your teenage years surrounded by girls, and the occasional male teacher. It also explains why you're more comfortable with gays and devout christians, they're people you see as sexually non-threatening. Even if you are a full-blown lesbian, being uncomfortable around men will only be a problem for you in life.

Try going to dance lessons for salsa or jive or something that will force you to interact with guys. At dance lessons, new guys might just want sex, 'tis true, but the guys who have obviously been doing it a while don't just want sex.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 146 (view)
 
Atheism and Dating
Posted: 5/2/2012 4:31:35 PM

Please dont not lump christianity which is a religion based on a god who loves and sacrificed for us in with muslims which is a hateful violent angery religion that distroys its members. Muslum and christian are about as far apart as chirtianity and wiccan/satanism


Actually, Islam and Christianity are about as far apart as Christianity and Judaism. Jewish lore basically stopped advancing with Moses. Christian lore basically stopped advancing with Jesus Christ. Islamic lore continued advancing until the time of Mohammed.

I grew up in what is officially a protestant (thats Christian) country, in a largely catholic area, and went to schools that had approximately 40% muslim kids. Every so often, the news would be full of news reports about religiously motivated violence, which was often fuelled by either the northern ireland independence question or by sectarian football supporters. Very rarely, in comparison, was there any Muslim vs Christian violence, and I'll be honest, the muslims were predominanently indian/pakistani, and the Christians were white, so its more likely to be a race, rather than religion thing.


I really dont attack anyones religion just state the facts of what they believe.
How do you figure that "hateful violent angry religion" isn't an attack on their religion?

To be perfectly clear, it is my observation that: people who want to be hateful will be; people who want to be violent will be, and; people who think that they will benefit, or save the world, through violence will be violent.

I am an agnostic. Maybe god exists, maybe he doesn't. However, I very much doubt the jewish/christian/islamic god exists, in the way that he is claimed to by those religions, because the usual schtick you get from someone who belongs to one of those religions will contradict their own arguments with surprising regularity.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 75 (view)
 
Are there any good men left?
Posted: 5/2/2012 3:27:00 PM
For Men:
M-1 What is your reaction to this Question when you see it in a women's online profile?
M-2 What experiences have you had with women who use this question in their online profiles?
M-3 What criteria do you use in determining whether you want to meet a woman in person?
M-4 What criteria do you use in determining whether a woman is a good woman after meeting her in person?

M1 - I wonder what the hell a "good man" is. Are they looking to date John Goodman, or a priest or what?
M2 - Generally, I've not bothered seeking experiences with them because they're predominantely single parents or have obvious self-confidence (or other) issues.
M3 - I need to answer with a yes to these questions: Am I attracted to their personality? Can I imagine being physical with them? Are there no other disqualifying things about them (like being an alcoholic/druggie or not living anywhere near me)?
M4 - It depends what you mean by "good" woman.

 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 10 (view)
 
He Got Mad at Me Because I....
Posted: 4/30/2012 4:32:24 PM
If he struggles to find time around his job to spend time with you, or do anything recreational, perhaps you should do something to make it easier for him to make time for you. The answer that leaps to my mind, is moving in with him. That way you'll be able to, at least, see him at breakfast, and possibly take care of some of the things that eat his free time.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 17 (view)
 
Is seeking chemistry realistic?
Posted: 4/30/2012 4:20:31 PM
Chemistry?

Oh, you mean, sexual attraction.

I don't see sexual attraction as being all that important, because I've got enough knowledge to know that there are certain things that can make the initial attraction irrelevant, and enough experience of sexual relationships to know that too much sex too early in a relationship can make it peter out too quickly. .

Ideally, sexual attraction wouldn't be at all important for several weeks into the relationship.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 9 (view)
 
what if you found out your man crossdressed?
Posted: 4/27/2012 11:27:59 AM
This thread is interesting and amusing!

I had a date or two with a girl who found out her ex-husband was a crossdresser and some sort of fetishist, and she did not know until they'd been married for several years. She reacted by divorcing him.

She also accused me of being a crossdresser because I'd mentioned that kilts are really comfy; I'm Scottish, and they are really comfy (but they do have their problems).



I do not think that lack of masculinity is what puts women off men who are actually crossdressers; if masculinity were that big a thing, I'd have women begging me to have them just because I have more than a week's worth of stubble.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 16 (view)
 
Dirty Houses??
Posted: 4/27/2012 12:09:01 AM

.is there a standard of housekeeping below which someone could slip that would be a deal breaker for you?
Yup.



I believe that it speaks volumes about the person, their personality and style, their maturity, and their cleanliness, when their home is neat and organized, cleaned and put together well. Even if just a room that is theirs, it will tell me much with how they live overall. My home is my castle and it is all mine to enjoy and let others enter as I feel moved to, and no matter what, it is clean enough, well maintained enough, and organized enough that most will give compliments about how a man can actually decorate, clean and maintain a place as well, if not better then most women....;)
It certainly speaks volumes about their "personality" (specifically how OCD they are) and "cleanliness" (depending how OCD they are about killing germs), but not maturity. Style you might infer from how they've decorated, but they might just buy cheap furniture 'cause it works.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 12 (view)
 
Should i date?
Posted: 4/27/2012 12:01:24 AM
If you're confident enough with the idea of dating to think it would be worthwhile, and that you'll maintain high enough (you define what this means) fitness levels whilst dating/trying to find the love of your life, then I see no reason not to.

If you're not..... well, thats your reason not to.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 124 (view)
 
Atheism and Dating
Posted: 4/25/2012 12:33:01 AM

I don't understand your need for a "narrower" or "stricter" definition of atheism/atheist. It means what it means, a lack of belief in a deity or deities.
Yes, that is the broadest, most inclusive meaning of the term. It, however, is so inclusive that it includes everyone, as it includes everyone, it is a worthless term.

You're a christian? You're still an atheist; you do not believe in the Hindu gods.
You're a Hindu? You're still an atheist; you do not believe in the Jewish/Christian/Islamic god. - Or the Norse, Roman, Greek or Egyptian gods.
You do not believe in any god? Yup, still an atheist.

Who isn't an atheist? Nobody..... So, 'cause everyone's an atheist, it's really not a particularly useful term.

For the word to be useful, it needs a more useful definition.

Animal is a good example of the same concept. You're an animal. - Does that statement offend you, or does it simply state the obvious, given that all humans are technically classified as animal?

The word animal, in a purely technical/scientific sense is useless in normal conversation, narrow it down to "wild animal" and suddenly it becomes useful again.


Disbelief, pure and simple. If there is a name for someone who can say with utter certainty that no God exists (and of course no one can, this would make them very similar to those who believe - believing in something which cannot be proven nor dis-proven.) I don't know what it is, but it isn't atheist under it's most basic definition.
Actually, thats exactly what an atheist is, under its most basic, restricted and widely accepted definitions. Skeptic is perhaps the word you're looking for.

Agnostics admit the possibility that god may, or may not exist. They're not sure.
Atheists deny the existence of god. There are things that you may percieve in reality that may lead you to believe that there can be no god, so "proof" can be found..

Agnosticism is largely incompatible with organised religion. I am not aware of any religion that does not tell you about the nature of god, and the definition of agnosticism (that god is unknowable), necessarily rejects any assertion made by the religion.

People do abuse the terms and misclassify themselves.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 120 (view)
 
Atheism and Dating
Posted: 4/24/2012 12:07:02 AM

Ahem...I respectfully disagree, Atheism means non-belief. While someone who makes the statement "There is
no God" most certainly may call themselves an Atheist, this does not mean that is the definition of atheism. It is simply how they identify themselves.

This article explains the differences between atheism and agnosticism very well. I will post the link at the bottom:


Well, I've read the bit of the article you posted.

There is one clear, logical inference and conclusion that the author has not made:

By the OED definition of an atheist, Christians (as believers in the "one, true, god", and disbelievers in all "false gods") are atheists; christians do not believe in any number of "pagan" gods, and thus satisfy the dictionary definition of atheist. The OED definition, without narrowing the sense of it down, is worthless. Therefore, you need to narrow the sense of it down.

From wiktionary: atheist (plural atheists)
(narrowly) A person who believes that no deities exist (especially, one who has no other religious belief).  
(broadly) A person who rejects belief that any deities exist (whether or not they believe that no deities exist)
(loosely) A person who has no belief in any deities, including those with no concept of deities.  
(loosely, rare) A person who does not believe in a particular deity (or any deity in a particular pantheon), notwithstanding that they may believe in another deity.  

If you can think of a narrower, stricter, definition of atheist than the first one, let me know. The third one is very similar, but slightly looser. The other two cover EVERYONE.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 15 (view)
 
Is a sense of humour a good trait ?
Posted: 4/22/2012 10:50:26 AM
Some people find the "comedian" Ricky Gervais funny. I find him to have a sadistic and ignorant, "sense of humour", which is about as likely to make me laugh, as a leech on my penis. Funnily enough, a leech on my penis would make Ricky Gervais laugh until he wets himself.

I find some people, when they say that they have a "dry" sense of humour to simply be denigrating and insulting. Jack Dee, for instance, is. Making fun of people is simply not that attractive.
 SomeStrangeMan
Joined: 6/4/2008
Msg: 74 (view)
 
Tell me about yourself.
Posted: 4/20/2012 10:58:03 AM

If you can't write something that makes any of those things self-evident then you're a zero-dimensional person with none of those attributes.
Can't is a long way from "won't". Do not mistake them.



You're confused. Instruction manuals are for people who lack the imagination to think for themselves. It's like an ASME manual for sex.
Nope, not confused.

I know that it takes longer to figure things out from scratch than it takes to use a manual, where a manual exists.
I imagine that it might be fun to try to figure it out from scratch, but I also imagine that things can go wrong that way. Badly wrong.
I can also imagine, that if you're starting with knowledge of all sorts of different things, your imagination can start working on more exotic variations of what is known.
 
Show ALL Forums