REGISTER
|
MAIL/PROFILE
|
HELP
|
NOW ONLINE
|
SEARCH
|
RATING
| FORUMS |
SUCCESS STORIES
Posted In Forum:
All Forums
Alabama
Alaska
Alberta
Arizona
Arkansas
Art/Music
Ask A Girl
Ask A Guy
Australia
British Columbia
Broken Hearts
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Dating & Love Advice
Dating Experiences
Dating Sites
Delaware
District Of Columbia
Event Hosts forum
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Health & Fitness
Humor
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Introductions
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Manitoba
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Brunswick
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
Newfoundland
News/Current Events
North Carolina
North Dakota
Nova Scotia
Off Topic
Ohio
Oklahoma
Ontario
Oregon
Over 30
Over 45
Pennsylvania
Plentyoffish Get Togethers
Plentyoffish Site/Suggestions/Help
Poems And Quotes
Politics
Prince Edward Island
Profile Reviews
Quebec
Recipes & Cooking
Relationships
Religion/Supernatural
Rhode Island
Saskatchewan
Science/Philosophy
Sex and Dating
Single Parents
South Carolina
South Dakota
Sports
Stories/creative writing
Technology and computers
Tennessee
Testimonials
Texas
Uk Forums
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Volunteer Moderators Only
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Home
login
MyForums
Show ALL Forums
Author
Thread: Blair loses out in European Presidency
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
42 (
view
)
Blair loses out in European Presidency
Posted:
11/23/2009 3:05:18 AM
The International Law Commission of the UN is responsible for the development of international law under article 13 of the UN charter.
I don't have a problem with that.
International law relates to conduct between sovereign states - it does not control how each citizen conducts himself, as that is a matter for each state.
There is international law and there are international courts and this country just like almost every other is subject to their jurisdiction which takes primacy over national law. If they did not then they would not be able to function.
The UN has no say over the national speed limit or company law in Great Britain, which is how it should be. The EU, however, DOES!
What does 'do rather well mean', just how many MPs do the UKIP, Libertas, the BNP or any other anti EU parties have in Westminster?.
That wasn't my point!
I stated that minority anti-EU parties do rather well in EU elections, NOT in General Elections. Read what is written.
The failure of the British political parties not to give the people of the UK a referendum is a failing of the British system not the EU.
It has nothing to do with the 'system' - it is a failure on the part of the three main parties to offer us a referendum.
Where a country's constitution allows for a referendum then the EU does nothing to stop them holding one and abides by it's result.
Absolute rubbish!!
The Irish have had to re-run three referendums (Amsterdam, Nice, and Lisbon) because the EU did not accept the result.
There are far more Britons living abroad than there are immigrants here. At the last census there were just over 6.4 million of them living in Australia alone with countless other millions living in New Zealand, South Africa, America and elsewhere taking jobs of local people and placing a burden on their social amenaties and services including prisons.
And a bloody good job, too!
We couldn't fit them in if they all returned.
Every law made here in the UK or in any other country for that matter has to be drawn up with respect international law....
No it did not!
Our government was sovereign here until 1973.
After over 30 years of membership, you cannot name a single example of an EU law that has not gone through our traditional process of Green paper, White paper, Westminster, House of Lords and then signed by the Queen. Not a single one in 30 odd years, kinda strange that given that you think they are forced upon us.
I mentioned several instances in your EU thread - plainly you chose not to read those posts. Read MSG 244 on this url:
http://forums.plentyoffish.com/12079803datingPostpage10.aspx
Then read:
http://www.poptel.org.uk/against-eurofederalism/d102howlgl.html
I take it that you are unfamiliar with the workings of the European Standing Committee? Basically, it decides which EU directives should be placed before parliament, and those which should not.
"In May 2006 the European Standing Committee, a sub committee of the House of Commons European Scrutiny Committee, a select committee, passed a government proposal to accept this piece of EU legislation and agreed there was no need for it to be debated on the floor of the Commons. This was agreed to by the MPs on 22 May where amending legislation is to be decided without debate."
You also appear to have 'forgotten' about Statutory Instruments, despite the fact that you banged on about them in your thread. If so, here's a reminder:
"Statutory Instruments are secondary legislation and used because they are much faster and simpler to implement than a full Act of Parliament. They have the same force as an Act of Parliament, and the great majority of Britain’s laws are made in this way. Two or three thousand SIs are passed each year compared to only a few dozen Acts. Many of these SIs really emanate from Brussels and the Government has admitted in answers to questions in parliament that over half of our legislation comes from the EU."
So, once again, I can provide links which support my statements - I do wish others could do the same......
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
38 (
view
)
Blair loses out in European Presidency
Posted:
11/21/2009 12:45:12 AM
The UK is a signatory to many international treaties and members of several international bodies all of which necessitate laws to fascilitate our membership and all of which impinge on our sovereignty to some degree.
Of course - we agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of various organisations.
However, neither NATO nor the UN tell us what our laws have to be, and they do not have courts which hols ultimate jurisdiction over the Queen's subjects.
An important point - shame you didn't spot it.
The British public got to have their say on these matters earlier this year at the European elections and just as the Irish vote 2:1 to remain in Europe, the British voted by a massive majority for parties that did not wish to leave the EU.
At A General Election, people tend to vote for parties based on their agenda for Britain, but at EU elections, those parties advocating withdrawal do rather well. None of the major parties has ever campaigned for withdrawal.
So, why don't the major parties offer Britain a referendum on withdrawal? Britons (by that, I mean proper Britons, not johnny-come-lately types) have much to gain from leaving. At the moment, for instance, we are having to build houses for those from abroad who have come here to take jobs off Britons, and who clog up our roads, schools, hospitals and prisons (yep, we even import criminals these days).
Are you seriously suggesting that we have votes on individual pieces of legislation that are passed through Westminster and the House of Lords?. Not only is that impracticable it is totally unworkable. We have a parliament and a legislative body that do this work for us......
No, we don't.
The EU tells us what our laws are, and any new laws 'created' by our parliament have to fit those of the EU.
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
5 (
view
)
Three pictures of members above my favourites list
Posted:
11/20/2009 1:02:31 PM
MSG 3 pmsl.....
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
33 (
view
)
Blair loses out in European Presidency
Posted:
11/20/2009 12:30:23 PM
But the EU is not a federal entity at all. It is a coming together of a number of sovereign nations.....
Don't talk rubbish!!!!
The EU creates the laws which governs those nations, and its courts hold the ultimate jurisdiction.
I know that europhiles don't like those facts, but they are true.
France is no longer a sovereign nation, and neither are Germany, Great Britain, Malta, Hungary..etfcukingcetera.
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
17 (
view
)
Blair loses out in European Presidency
Posted:
11/20/2009 1:06:46 AM
The appointment of Baroness Ashton is a great honour for this country
In what way?
She will be making decisions on behalf of the EU, and sometimes they will be contrary to those of the British people. Plus, she has never been elected by popular mandate to any position she's ever held........come to think of it, she represents most of what is bad about the EU!
together with Von Rompuy they were inspired choices for these two new roles.
And in what way was his appointment 'inspired'?
Baroness Ashton's appointment is a milestone for women in politics and as a committed CND supporter it is another giant step towards this country giving up it's nuclear weapons.
I reckon she got the job mainly because she has a vagina......
'Committed'??
Unfortunate choice of word, lol....
The fact is that we are going to have access to a greater supply of nuclear weapons, given the creation of the European army, so I don't understand your point. If she is also against nuclear weapons, that won't make a blind bit of difference, and I wouldn't be surprised if she now changed her stance on that issue.
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
82 (
view
)
How long will you stick with POF?
Posted:
11/20/2009 12:59:09 AM
Find it a real head messer though the dating game and online dating. People will give really good feedback after a date and say how they're looking forward to the next one, and then nothing.
Yup, people mess with our heads, just like in real life.
The internet just gives them another tool. The more opportunities they have to contact us, the greater the ways they can mess with us.
Sure POF opens doors to a lot of people, but it sure does give you a kicking too!
It's a double-edged sword, isn't it? It gives us greater access to people, but it increases the chances of encountering those who frankly we wouldn't want in our lives.
My natural optimism has been a great help these past few years, and when a relative disaster happens, I'm well prepared to move on......with just a slight shake of the head!
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
15 (
view
)
Blair loses out in European Presidency
Posted:
11/20/2009 12:52:38 AM
That must be a kick in the teeth for Bliar. Belgium haven't even got a government!
You're right, although it's real Government sits elsewhere in Brussels!
Just shows how the EU governs us all. It won't be long before each country's parliament can be dismantled.
The new president, btw, has the powers that Hitler wanted. Funny how the Treaty of Rome was written by men who wanted a single European state to prevent .......er.....people like Hitler ever ruling ...er....Europe.....
It would be hilarious if it weren't so serious. God knows how future historians will view the period from 1929 to 2009, but I suspect they'll think the political class lost it's collective marbles.
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
32 (
view
)
I think I've scared him big time, how to resolve this?
Posted:
11/19/2009 3:59:34 PM
I found my mouth twitching, hands shaking, face going red, brain going all fuddled, legs feeling weak and the urge to run away. How do I control this - anyone got any hints/tips?
Why fight it? Just enjoy it while it lasts!
In no time at all you'll probably wondering what ever you saw in him - you haven't even had a proper conversation together......
Next time you meet, just invite him for a drink, and take it from there - you have nothing to lose!
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
11 (
view
)
Blair loses out in European Presidency
Posted:
11/19/2009 3:54:09 PM
The EU is now a state......we are ALL losers!
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
10 (
view
)
I think I've scared him big time, how to resolve this?
Posted:
11/19/2009 1:44:36 PM
And I do realise that I sound totally childish for a woman my age....
Thank God you said it first!
This sort of behaviour ended for most of us when we hit grammar school.
You know nothing about this guy except for the fact that he seems a bit of a wimp......why not find a man whose balls have dropped?
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
5 (
view
)
I think I've scared him big time, how to resolve this?
Posted:
11/19/2009 1:34:44 PM
Forgive me, but what exactly is there to 'resolve'?
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
58 (
view
)
Time wasting?
Posted:
11/18/2009 12:01:16 AM
I get a strong feeling that many women 'dating' on line arent actually interested in dating, they are playing some other game, more to do with attention seeking, and boredom relieving, rather than seeking a partner.
You're right.
It's just a question of finding out which ones ARE serious about seeing you. There will be upsets along the way, but also some good times, and it's a case of appreciating them for what they are, rather than for what they might become.
Btw, I don't believe that we find the serious ones - I reckon that they find us!
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
22 (
view
)
CHRISTMAS KARAOKE AT THE BLUE LAGOON, HOVE (actually) SATURDAY 5th DECEMBER, 2009
Posted:
11/17/2009 11:38:39 AM
Jeez, Sandra, that must be the quickest change of decision I've ever seen on a pof thread!
I'm sorry you won't be able to make this one, but there is always another time...
CK, isn't it time our lift signed up?
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
33 (
view
)
Ethnicity, Sex, Religion even income - all distinct on profiles - Should Politics be included?
Posted:
11/16/2009 1:42:18 PM
That means, you know, the real world and not dating sites or the internet.
Quite, but the topic in question clearly states that we are discussing profiles, as does the OP.
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
149 (
view
)
So, what's 'wrong' with The Daily Mail and those who read it?
Posted:
11/16/2009 1:39:21 PM
It's probably one of those sites and will be sending you offers for money off the Daily Mail and one way tickets to Poland.
Why would Daily mail readers be wanting one-way tickets to Poland?
Am I a conventional, unadventurous, middle of the road fascist because I read the Daily Mail sometimes, or do I read the Daily Mail sometimes because I'm a conventional, unadventurous, middle of the road fascist?
Am I only a fascist on the days I read the Daily Mail? Or a fascist on the days I only read the Daily Mail? What am I on the days I read the Times, the Independent, the Mail and the Guardian, apart from very confused?
Good point well put!
Satirising the Daily Mail is essentially a lazy joke perpetuated by self-appointed intellectual superiors and fourth-rate comedians harpooning the melodramatic, sensationalist tone of its headline stories.
Yup!
Although I think you meant 'lampooning'!
OP: This is off topic, but "pointing at Brighton and Hove Albion"...what's that all about?
PM me.....all will be explained!
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
31 (
view
)
Ethnicity, Sex, Religion even income - all distinct on profiles - Should Politics be included?
Posted:
11/16/2009 1:12:50 PM
Funnily enough, from my experience it's the brave boys of the far right who publicly tend to be a bit coy about their political views when they haven't got back-up readily at hand.
I'm not sure how many males' profiles you look at, but I find it rare to see political views on women's profiles, regardless of what hue they follow.
This is probably because women tend not to be as interested in politics as men.
It states plainly on my profile that I'd rather a woman didn't vote Labour, because it would mean she hasn't a clue about politics, and the conversations about it would be rather one-sided!
Oh, and right-wing views are very popular on pof among the women! Once they get to know you and relax a bit, such opinions flow from them. Whether it's about education, crime and punishment, immigration, or whatever, many women on here hold 'right-wing' views, and they probably keep their thoughts to themselves profile-wise because of snide comments.
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
23 (
view
)
Eastbourne Christmas Meet - November 28th 2009 - Sambar - 7pm Until 3am
Posted:
11/16/2009 12:23:50 AM
Signing up encourages others to do the same.
Even if you're not entirely sure if you'll be able to make it on the night, you are helping out in a small way.
It looks like I'll be deffo attending this one.
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
41 (
view
)
What is meant by the 'left' and 'right'?
Posted:
11/16/2009 12:09:27 AM
The BNPs core voter is a former Labour supporter - check the areas where they gain seats.
You might not want to be associated with said party, but the reality is they are more left than you would like to admit .
Spot on, although it might have something to do with the fact that Labour voters have more to lose from matters relating to immigration than Tory ones.
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
37 (
view
)
What is meant by the 'left' and 'right'?
Posted:
11/15/2009 12:04:29 PM
I'm show near to Gandhi - should I buy sandals?
Probably - and you should also raid the fridge.
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
32 (
view
)
What is meant by the 'left' and 'right'?
Posted:
11/15/2009 10:55:52 AM
Comrade!
The BNP are National Socialists so have a very authoritarian social stance (fascism)...
Not really.
They actually want to disentangle us from the nazi EU and give us back our democracy.
Na, the test does have flaws ...
No shit, Sherlock?
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
10 (
view
)
What is meant by the 'left' and 'right'?
Posted:
11/14/2009 4:44:09 AM
I took the test......
I'm in the red square!
Perhaps now people can stop calling me a right-wing nut - apparently, I'm a left-wing nut!
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
12 (
view
)
Regards climate change, is the phrase save the planet misleading?
Posted:
11/13/2009 2:44:30 PM
It doesn't add up.
The climate is always changing over long periods of time, so the planet doesn't need 'saving' from it.
The whole thing is a con designed to extract large sums of money from us and to make people feel less guilty about their conduct.
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
37 (
view
)
Polite replies/refusals
Posted:
11/11/2009 3:51:15 PM
I always reply to all mail unless its rude or distasteful, in which case, being ladylike goes out the window!
Does that mean that you don't respond, or that you respond using unladylike language?
If someone is polite with me, then I'll reply in kind. I can usually tell if we are both interested after a couple of emails, and generally the emails fizzle out.
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
4 (
view
)
Have you cheated death?
Posted:
11/11/2009 11:30:29 AM
Every time I sneeze!
Apparently, a blood vessel expands, and the pressure is released once the sneeze has finished.
In 1986, I was on my bike and hit sideways on by a speeding car (according to the police). I asked what had smashed his windscreen in, and was told that I had!
There wasn't a scratch on me.......
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
7 (
view
)
Malicious use of the 'Report User' facilty
Posted:
11/11/2009 11:24:57 AM
The possibility exists if there is a persistant need to examine certain cases.
Isn't there a danger of that being too late in most cases?
If the mechanism is being triggered by the same people, then removing them from the site won't be of much use to those who had fallen victim to their maliciousness.
And we already know that the site does not examine any of the reports which trigger the mechanism. I am aware of several people who fell victim to this practice, because their deletion was trumpeted elsewhere on the internet, and for no reason other than they had upset members of a particular group.
So if the site is not examining each individual complaint once the trigger has been achieved, then it is failing to protect its members from malicious conduct. It follows that it doesn't matter what the reason given is (eg 'abusive user' - told me my hair looked funny), if the site doesn't check them, then the malicious complainants 'get away with it.'
This cannot possibly be right!
Either:
1) Every report should be examined, and judged upon its merit.
2) The trigger should be raised to a substantial level.
3) The trigger should be raised to a reasonable level, and once activated, the complaints should be examined and judged on their merit.
4) The mechanism should be abolished.
I accept that this may involve more effort on the part of the site when a group of malicious reporters decides upon a target, but it will improve the site's standing if it is shown to be protecting site members from acts of malice.
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
8 (
view
)
Animal thoughts
Posted:
11/11/2009 9:14:42 AM
I mean it's standing there watching it's owner/master picking up and keeping in a bag in his pocket,something that he would probably try to bury.
I don't observe dogs whilst they are pooing, but I don't think they bury it.
perhaps that's me reading too much into it....
Yes, perhaps..
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
40 (
view
)
Does Gordon Brown deserve such criticism over his miss spelt letter?
Posted:
11/11/2009 9:03:59 AM
He's a fcuking disgrace and I feel totally ashamed that we have a representative who is unable to carry out such basic tasks which should come naturally to most of us that possess humanity.
Thankfully, very few people are to blame for the fact that he is the head of the government.
The sad thing is that some people think he is fit to continue in that post...
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
160 (
view
)
Baldness - is it an issue?
Posted:
11/11/2009 9:00:15 AM
So everyone who doesn't fancy bald guys is ugly?
Where did my post mention anything about 'fancying'?
The quoted section contains the word 'mocked'.
HTH
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
4 (
view
)
Animal thoughts
Posted:
11/11/2009 8:57:40 AM
because the dog usually looks a bit confused.
Why would a dog be confused about that? Does the dog normally picks its own poo up?
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
136 (
view
)
So, what's 'wrong' with The Daily Mail and those who read it?
Posted:
11/11/2009 8:13:40 AM
Signs, gestures, photographs, pictures, statues, cartoons etc. can also give rise to a claim for defamation, but the most obvious types of defamatory statements are written or spoken words.
HTH
It certainly did!
I think you'll find there are plenty of "rules" about defamation.
Yes, there are, but the quoted section wasn't referring to those rules - merely to the fact that defamation takes various forms.
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
133 (
view
)
So, what's 'wrong' with The Daily Mail and those who read it?
Posted:
11/11/2009 7:28:19 AM
Wrong again, that is slander, defemation is published..
Sorry, but I'm right.
There are no rules governing as to how the defamation takes place - it can be written or spoken.
HTH
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
19 (
view
)
Hairy backs - are they an issue?
Posted:
11/11/2009 6:23:50 AM
ok maybe hairy feet are a bit freaky but easily removed
Bit extreme, making him have his feet amputated.....can't he just use Immac?
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
153 (
view
)
Baldness - is it an issue?
Posted:
11/11/2009 6:22:12 AM
It's not an issue for me.
If a woman were bald, or if she started to go bald, it wouldn't affect the relationship in the slightest. It has no bearing on her personality whatsoever.
I am going thin on top, and chose to remove the remainder because it made me feel better. My partners seem to like it, and the closer the shave, the better it feels for them. I generally grow it back in winter, but have been requested to keep it off since 2004, and this winter, I am maintaining the summer crop (down to the wood) until otherwise requested.
I see various comments from shallow, ugly people who seem to think that baldness is something to be mocked. Well, most people have no control over their hair loss, in the same way that the mockers have no control over their looks. They do, however, have control over their personality, yet they choose to remain ugly inside.
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
16 (
view
)
Hairy backs - are they an issue?
Posted:
11/11/2009 6:10:34 AM
I'd rather a woman didn't have too much hair in her back, but given that I tend to have partners who have darker hair, it does show up more than blonde.
It's not an issue, though, just a preference.....if a woman has lots of body hair, it wouldn't cause me any problems
Good excuse to dump a loser though
So, having a hairy back makes a man a 'loser'?
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
1 (
view
)
Malicious use of the 'Report User' facilty
[CLOSED Thread]
Posted:
11/11/2009 6:01:17 AM
Whilst this is a useful and necessary feature of the site, it appears that is it being abused by various site members who have learned that there is a mechanism for deleting profiles simply by weight of numbers.
The facility has a section in which the complainant must provide details of their complaint, and they are warned that if the facility is misused, then they face sanctions themselves for 'malicious reporting'.
This means that every report is examined and judged on merit.
With the trigger mechanism, however, the veracity of each complaint is not examined, with the result that a group of members can go round the site deleting profiles at will for no other reason than 'malice' towards the person concerned. There are various websites in which this deletion process is openly discussed and profiles targeted
This occurred to one moderator, with the result that the moderating team were subsequently protected from this mechanism.
However, the rest of the pof membership is at risk from multiple malicious reporting.
The mechanism should be either removed or increased to a substantial amount, and when that figure is reached, the reports should be examined for veracity. In that way, the malicious reporters would be ' found out' and suitably punished.
After all, every report on the forum violations thread is examined on merit, so why aren't reports against individual profiles given the same treatment.
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
31 (
view
)
Does Gordon Brown deserve such criticism over his miss spelt letter?
Posted:
11/10/2009 3:55:40 PM
He did!
Felt tip to write a serious letter??
Should have used a fountain at the very least.
Mine is too, but who's perfect?
Well, mine, for a start.
The thing is, he writes like a ten-year-old...
Isnt it his advisors job to do all this for him, he merely wrote a letter expressing his sorrow, in his own words, even though they werent spelt right, he still made an effort.
I won't dignify your comment with a response.
He corrected it!
- most sane people would have started again.
Why??
It was a letter of condolence, not a shopping list.
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
22 (
view
)
Does Gordon Brown deserve such criticism over his miss spelt letter?
Posted:
11/10/2009 2:12:33 PM
Yes, he deserves a kicking for various reasons.
First of all, he shouldn't have placed that soldier in Afghanistan in the first place.
Second, why the fcuk can't he use a pen?
Third, his writing is awful.
Fourth, he couldn't even be bothered to get the guy's name right.
Fifth, he got the guy's first name wrong, and corrected it - most sane people would have started again.
Sixth, he's a Labour PM - they deserve a good kicking just for that.
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
2 (
view
)
babylon lounge haloween nighter
Posted:
11/10/2009 1:45:38 AM
I've seen the pix already, Rob, and I was pleased that so many people were able to attend at such short notice.
The costumes were certainly eye-catching!
And 'well done' to all those who rallied round to support you both - once again, our friends come through for us!
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
6 (
view
)
Did Addict Prisoner Deserve Compensation?
Posted:
11/10/2009 1:13:50 AM
Did he use drugs before he went to prison?
If so, he shouldn't receive a penny for the drug use in prison.
However, if he didn't, then the authorities are partly to blame for placing him in a situation where drugs use eased his condition.
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
19 (
view
)
Cats vs Dogs
Posted:
11/9/2009 2:27:26 PM
Dogs have owners, but cats have staff.
It sums up the relationship beautifully!
I kinda like the fact that I've been adopted by Tiger. He's not a fussy eater (hates chicken, even if starving), he doesn't smell the place up, he never sleeps here, and he buggers off if I have to go out.
Dogs look like hard work. My lifestyle would not suit having one, even though I get on well with most of them.
Each to their own, of course....
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
11 (
view
)
friendship
Posted:
11/9/2009 2:02:26 PM
Friendship is what the two people make it.
If your friendship works, then why worry about it?
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
5 (
view
)
Hate being truthful about myself.
Posted:
11/9/2009 1:58:51 PM
You made a choice - you have to accept that some won't approve of it.
It's the way of the world.
You know that people in your position can find happiness, and there's no reason that you won't find it, too.
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
33 (
view
)
Going naked In Public
Posted:
11/9/2009 12:07:03 PM
why is it that all the folks that want to parade round naked have the most horrible bodies ?!
And why do all the fit ladies never want to do that ??!
You've answered your own question!
People don't go and stare at the 'horrible' bodies, but people do go and stare at pretty ones. Obviously, some of those women won't appreciate being stared at, so they don't go there.
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
27 (
view
)
Going naked In Public
Posted:
11/9/2009 10:20:08 AM
I don't have a problem with public nudity.
If someone wants to walk through Trafalgar Square with no clothes on, then 'good luck' to them.
There are far more offensive sights around.....
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
5 (
view
)
being honest with yourself?
Posted:
11/9/2009 10:13:22 AM
I always trust my 'inner voice' - the body never lies.
There are times when I go against what it is telling me, but there are usually compelling reasons behind those decisions.
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
6 (
view
)
Babylon Lounge ~ Hove ~ 6th November 2009 ~ Pictures and Comments
Posted:
11/9/2009 2:01:26 AM
Who cares about the turnout or the number/quality of the pix, Chippy?
Not me! I had a wonderful evening with my friends from the site, and many thanks to you for organising it.
And 'well done' for having the tide crashing on the beach at the back!
The djs played a wide range of music at an acceptable level, so keeping the dance floor moving and letting us chat as well.
Thanks, too, to all my buddies who reminded me of just why you are all so special, and a special 'thank you' to the felines for their company, the lift, and the berth x
Your smile made the evening
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
41 (
view
)
Can Haye Win ?
Posted:
11/8/2009 5:06:40 PM
Crap contest, and I hope no Martians were watching.
Er.......so this is 'boxing', right?......so why is that guy not trying to box the other one......ok...so it's a contest of playing to your strengths, yes......so why isn't that guy on the running track....you don't have races in which you run backwards??...but he's a natural!.....(another Kronenburg, please)........so, he won that round, and didn't land a punch?.....ok.........(nice tits, luv!)..............that game we watched on the internet earlier...yes, Oldham versus Leeds........the team who attacked the most won it easily, right.......that game of rugby league we watched at the same time.......England versus...? somebody in black.....New Zealand, yeah, New Zealand ...ugly fcukers, weren't they! ha ha.....well, England attacked the most , and won the game, right?....so why did that guy who never took a forward step get awarded the contest?......
Many thanks to Paula for putting up with me throughout a very long night xx
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
10 (
view
)
LOL!
Posted:
11/6/2009 12:37:27 AM
Do people really use 'lol' in speech?
I know they sometimes giggle at the end of a sentence, but saying 'lol' doesn't sound right, somehow.
Do they say "el oh el" or "lol" , which rhymes with "sol"?
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
4 (
view
)
Nidal Hasan Shoots & Kills 12 US Soldiers
Posted:
11/6/2009 12:24:52 AM
STOP PRESS, I've just noticed that the guy who lives down the road and drives an ice cream van has the name Rossi written on the side of it, the murdering thieving mafia swine!
Just be grateful he wasn't playing his guitar!
OP, have you ever heard of Timothy McVeigh?
zeegary
Joined:
9/25/2008
Msg:
21 (
view
)
Ethnicity, Sex, Religion even income - all distinct on profiles - Should Politics be included?
Posted:
11/6/2009 12:20:20 AM
If they stuck a Politics choice on here Nick Griffin would probably have cause to set up special social events to encourage the interbred to match up and breed.
He's hardly likely to encourage the 'interbred' to breed further!
The more divisions you put up in view, the fewer options you find to make that match.
It works both ways - you reduce the number of wasted emails.
Show ALL Forums