when does confidence give way to arrogance.

That being said, I am really surprised that anyone would post such unfounded accusations about a site that they are being given the privilege of participating on. Like Trappedonbayst I would really like to see documentation to back up these statements.

In closing, just my 2 cents but I think more likely than not, assumptions like this are based on either user error or incomprehension of how features really work. Bottom line the answer to everything is not always a conspiracy and/or a scam and I would not be surprised in the least if admin took a hard stand on users spreading such unfounded facts as truths.

I hate Alpha males, who muscle up at the gym and shave their heads...ewwwww

Ive lost count of the number of dates i've been on and i've known from the first look they were not "my type" but because i'm a decent human being with morals and an appreciation of other peoples feelings.....

Steer clear of beautiful (ugly) women in future.

Then to my shock horror i recieved a txt message which said 'Sorry your not my type'

Delete any message in your inbox and it should fix it.

Try clearing internet cache in ur browser

My error was going in a bus lane, was it my fault? Of course it was.

When I blamed my sat-nav is was nothing but a mere joke which you failed to realise.

I think you're blowing this 'error' way out of proportion.

"The law states" is what you said earlier. So now you're contradicting yourself.

You're one of those people (I'm assuming) who create arguments just for an argument.

You can't tell me to abide by the law ...

when you think it's ok to do 200mph down a motorway.

If you're over-taking vehicles by going stupidly high speeds, then you're the danger to other road users.

the bus would've just driven into the back of the car...

Whether I had a sat-nav or not, I would have probably made the same mistake. When I am driving, I am looking at my surroundings, people crossing the road, traffic lights, etc...Being my first time driving in Leeds (in my opinion) isn't easy. Road signs are very easily miss-able. I’ve been driving 4 years in March and this will be my first offense. I have a feeling, if I had in fact gotten a fine for speeding, you wouldn’t have bothered replying.

But I still don't understand what your issue is like I said earlier. This isn't a post to let your personal grudges out on me. You've probably been hit while driving your motorbike and you have a personal vendetta against drivers.

I have a feeling, if I had in fact gotten a fine for speeding, you wouldn’t have bothered replying.

I've been in an unknown area and ended up going the wrong way up a bus only section of a road andwaited for the fixed penalty to drop through my letterbox...I was lucky, it didn't come....

But if you're gonna die, why not do it in the ring? Its a fitting end for a wrestler.

thats what i said i did say they were told to stop stop smoking them or leave.

It said in local paper today that a women and her daughter celebrating a family occasion who were smoking e cigarettes were asked to leave the bar .

Come on seriously, we all know these people "smoke" these things as a defiant middle fingers up to the smoking ban and all non-smokers.

You quoted me and you still failed to read "listening to my sat-nav".

......and they expect me to look at the floor markings

I'm driving whilst listening to a sat-nav. I'm already multi-tasking and they expect me to look at the floor markings?!?!

City centres can be very confusing with so much signage all over the place, plus you have to cope with other cars who do know where they're going getting frustrated with you for driving slowly and looking lost, if you looked out for and took in every single sign/marking you'd be paying hardly any attention to the road

It goes on to defend the use of the n word as well
an i stopped reading at this objective point

Pretty sure the words and the desires expressed by them in the video were so odious that even fellow racists wish to distance them from them ...what's your view?

Its a hatchet job and as far from objective as it is possible to get.

I'm not surprised to see that there's going to be an appeal

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16795824

Although, I thought it would be about the forensic evidence put forward, rather than the surveillance tapes.

I think that with the way this case was handled, an appeal was inevitable.

It’s a fair enough question, but it is a fair enough answer to point out examples of now independent countries keeping the UK Queen as Head of State, Australia being one such example. Its lame to ask it then not expect those examples to be brought up.

Ancestry and nationality doesn’t necessarily have any significance on being King or Queen. William the C, Sweyn Forkbeard and Cnute were Kings of England, though they were from elsewhere.

I'm just worried the English will scupper it like they did the last attempt by careful use of percentages (ok, scuppered actually by a Scot MP in an English constituency that dreamt up how to make it impossible)

We still have many of the same life issues regardless of whether we are fat or slimmer, it's a myth that weight loss leads to instant happiness.

.it has nothing to do with the sight of a bunch of half naked bikini clad women dripping in sweat and jumping around with there tits bouncing up and down and there buttocks wobbling all over the place.for me..its the sport i enjoy.its a very noble game.

never ever trust nationalists, after all the wee German man who invaded Poland was a staunch nationalist.


Come on the Internationalists...........

The SNP are an inclusive, tolerant and multiculturally diverse party who work for, and represent, all the peoples of Scotland regardless of their ethnic origins and are against everything that the heinous racists of the BNP, UKIP and the EDL stand for.....

What if the Shetland island or Orkney or any other island decide that they want independEnce from Scotland?

By finding the topic on a list that doesn't show what forum it's in, and not thinking to check once you click on it.

Why are strangers in London pubs/bars ignored?

Couldn't give a toss... they haven't answered which speaks volumes..

Do you deny the murder of Steven Lawrence?

I have asked them to state positively that they DO have compassion for this black kid, if they have political beliefs which prevent them from doing so, they will not, because they do not feel such things...

"I dont think anyone on here has personal involvement"
What are you psychic? Are you friends with them? Do you know what they think?

It wasn’t the OP that started the issue of the Queen off in message 399

In one of the few pieces of clarity that have emerged from Mr. Salmond regarding an Independent Scotland he has confirmed that the Union of the crowns would be unaffected and the Queen would remain Head of State – though of course she would be Queen Elizabeth the First of Scotland...........

Scotland's Future: Draft Referendum (Scotland) Bill Consultation
1.19 Her Majesty The Queen would remain as Head of State. The current parliamentary and political Union of Great Britain and Northern Ireland would become a monarchical and social Union – united kingdoms rather than a United Kingdom – maintaining a relationship forged in 1603 by the Union of the Crowns.

The Australians and Candians amongst others, independent nations have no problem in defying Zeegary logic keeping her as Head of State.

If you are going to make a song and dance about how the Head of State of England can be Head of State of an independent Scotland, then you are leaving the door open with tea and biscuits laid out on a table, for someone to bring up the Queen’s Germanic ancestral roots.

you can ask the Aussies the same question

One thing I have found is that most men haven't got a clue when it comes to size. I wonder what they think the average size for a female is?

......i dont find skinny guys attractive anyway....

apparently cos im a bigger girl men dont seem to want to see past that to find that i am a nice person.

That's for them to decide but as far as I'm concerned they're as Scottish/British/Asian/European in nationality as they want to be.

My point was that if Scotland were to retain the Queen as head of state it wouldn't be a case of adopting the English monarchy. The joint monarchy exists because James VI of Scotland inherited the throne of England and is as much Scottish as it is English. At various times though a foreign born monarch has at some point taken over the throne. William of Orange being another example.

Besides, isn't Liz Saxe-Coburg Germany anyway?

@ x-audax-at-fidelis-x
Do you have any sympathy or compassion for Steven Lawrence or his family?
Do you have some personal involvement with the case?
Do you deny the murder of Steven Lawrence?
Do you see the whole case as a deliberate hoax to advance left-wing, multicultural interests in this country, ie. a Steven lawrence murder denier?
Just curious...

Blimey, so many people here posting know so much better than all the experts, the judge and the jury,

I ask again,did anyone attend the trial and hear what the judge and jury heard? And not just going on what the media have put out there?

Yes since devolution all of the administrative framework is already in place. It would just be a matter of transferring the powers that are currently reserved to Westminster. There are already HMRC and DWP offices in Scotland that (with some staff retraining) would take over the functions of these government departments and it wouldn't really differ from the way the devolved NHS was created.

....new singles evryday join this site.(so it says when i come to log in),erm,is that not ironic?so dating ,relationships are useless?,well if i needed another knock on confidence,this is it!.

You asked the question about retaining the Queen as the Head of State.

The Aussies are a perfectly relevant example and legitimate analogy.

As a lady who has and probably will always battle with her weight but is kicking b**t at the gym and shifting it I wonder how much does weight figure in a persons decision to pick a mate is it really that important or not?

Please read this and let it sink in...

"nothing had been said in mitigation that convinced the court she should be spared an immediate jail sentence, the judge said. He had "no doubt" that Dallas knew "perfectly
well" the trial judge had directed members of the jury not to seek information from the internet but "deliberately disobeyed the order".

(source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-16676871)

The key words you may want to read in the above sentance are "deliberately" and "seek". I think the judge is a higher authority in this case than you...don't you agree? i think it's pretty well established her intent was infact very deliberate.

Whether my presumption of Ms Dallas being nosey was correct or not is irellevant my comment was aimed at the op not the poster i had quoted. How many more times would you like me to say it?

I was referring to her proven penchant for sniffing around in the accused's background when she would have been forbidden from doing so. For being "nosey", for trying to sniff out her own facts to present to the jury when that was the job of the prosecution alone.

I have no idea what the woman looks like (She could look like a gnome for all i know) so i could'nt possibly have an opinion on the actual physical size of her nose.

The 'nose' comment is not relevant to the topic,


And your seven lines of off topic nonsense is? I'm surprised at you, flaunting your own rules n'all...... if you had any moral fibre you'd report yourself forthwith.


so it was obviously aimed at the quoted poster.


Think what you like but it wasn't. I can assure you if it was aimed at the quoted poster i would have said it was aimed at the quoted poster in my reply to the to the unnecassary haughty slap on the wrist i received because someone somehow managed to grab the wrong end of a one ended stick.


She specifically ruled out such evidence being introduced by either the public or members of the jury,


At the risk of incurring another round of insomnia curing drivel with more twists than a columbo plot.......What is your point exactly? My point was about previous conduct being introduced to proceedings full stop, regardless of who introduces it. I honestly do not know why we went to all the expense of Cern, i do believe you could split the atom in one afternoon with a keyboard.

Maybe ask the Aussies that one. After all they had a referendum and voted to keep her rather than become a republic.

Besides, isn't Liz Saxe-Coburg Germany anyway?

What the hell are you banging on about??? my post was referring to the woman in the OP, not you.

Yep - as I thought - in other words:-

1. If sex is deemed moral then that person must be rampant - obviously!
2. If losing an argument - twist everything!
3. To some men the word sex is synonymous with acts most of us do consider immoral!
4. Always be careful never to let the facts get in the way!

If you sleep with somebody on the first night without knowing a thing about them, it will set the tone for the relationship, they won't think highly of you, they will just think you are only interested in sex. They wont commit to you or take you seriously, basically.

If you could kindly point out who it is that has seen nothing immoral about this.

It depends on whether or not you see sex as something immoral. If not then there would be nothing wrong with sex on a first date or soon after. After all sexual chemistry is an important part of a relationship and it's as well to find out if you're compatible sooner rather than later.

Sex with a sibling certainly is immoral and indeed illegal not to mention the more obvious sex with a minor. Sex on a first date or any bloody date may very well be also immoral or at least unethical if one or both happen to be married/ attached to someone else for instance. One night stands per se between unattached adults are certainly not immoral , but are certain to be found distasteful if you are stupid enough to shout/ brag/whine about it, it’s not alone for immorality do a good many people give people who indulge in such pastimes a wide berth. If you want to indulge in such a dubious lifestyle , then fill your boots, but don’t even dare think that you won’t be judged and judged very harshly by some other people, and that attitude is not going to change until Earth collides with Andromeda.

^^^^

Looks like its my turn again to be the subject of your incoherent ramblings.

It is a simple question - is it immoral or not to have sex?

.....I cannot believe some men still think its ok to think a woman who enjoys carnal pleasure frequently with different men is wrong when she probably uses protection and gets check ups frequently its double standards and i would never judge....

May i suggest they're a little uptight because the self righteous, boring fecks are not getting any?

.I only have a profile so I can read the forums....I dont have to make a big thing of that, unlike some ATTENTION SEEKING people who make a big thing about leaving which never materialises.Also I dont come on here and think that Im speaking for EVERYONE as you do at times.

But I think the gist of what I was trying to say is clear enough.

I should of said some people,and not said all of us.

Men want sex to find love,women want love to have sex, and thats how mistakes get made, on both sides.

I cant imagine a man waiting for 6 months or more for sex until he knows he is in love with a woman....

I would happily wait that amount of time to have sex...

I would say it progresses when there is a feeling, and it's not something that you have to do in order for the relationship to develop.

It's not that a woman has to do anything specific to keep a man interested after the sex, it's a feeling he has about and for you that will keep him interested.

Please dont make assumptions on my character

It is a simple question - is it immoral or not to have sex?

We've all been there when it's freezing between you after the event and all you can think of is when you can possibly get away asap without seeming impolite?

I would say it progresses when there is a feeling, and it's not something that you have to do in order for the relationship to develop.

I think duvets are best suited to stable relationships. For all other encounters, the back of a skip should suffice.

In addition a Scottish bank was recently bailed out with billions of cash from the Treasury. That was because it was a UK bank, not because the English parliament was feeling generous on that day and wanted to help a Scottish bank.

The reason so many of us are against the break up of the UK is that we know we will be stronger as a whole.

We are part of the EU because we joined a union for common trade some 40 years ago. That has developed and we now accept some of the laws of the European Union in the UK. But we are not governed by them, we are not part of a single country, we are still a member of a European Union for trade purposes.