Notice: Forums will be shutdown by June 2019

To focus on better serving our members, we've decided to shut down the POF forums.

While regular posting is now disabled, you can continue to view all threads until the end of June 2019. Event Hosts can still create and promote events while we work on a new and improved event creation service for you.

Thank you!

Plentyoffish dating forums are a place to meet singles and get dating advice or share dating experiences etc. Hopefully you will all have fun meeting singles and try out this online dating thing... Remember that we are the largest free online dating service, so you will never have to pay a dime to meet your soulmate.
     
Show ALL Forums  > Science/philosophy  >      Home login  
 AUTHOR
 jackal44
Joined: 4/19/2019
Msg: 240
view profile
History
The Science of Global WarmingPage 10 of 10    (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)
^^^^what is five trillion? The new republican mantra of fiscal rectitude includes deficits don't matter...reduce taxes and economic growth will solve all problems. Add 500 billion per year to the current 1.2 trillion deficit. No biggie. Repubs sure are smart.
 Inicia
Joined: 10/11/2018
Msg: 241
view profile
History
The Science of Global Warming
Posted: 5/2/2019 6:30:19 PM
even in-that we choose its just normal, in past, we have not experienced a 10000yr time span that was without radical climate change. with mass species extinction or devastation. Sure it can be normal, no need for this civilized species "Mankind" to attempt any interference, just use all our disposable income perpetuating the economy. Cause after-all when that happens as is standard we will need the economy.
For??
its not like we need-anything else we won't be here. haha. we will have protected everything as it is. Exactly ten thousand years just to prove what? all the data science education, government, economy, entertainment? , that is what we did with our 10000 yrs of existence. we just need to fix the cattle, farts so we can keep eating twenty steaks a week. Rather than change the use of non renewable energy. we would be better off forcing the oceans to produce enough seaweed to minimize cow gas,of course that is a economic opportunity. that research was funded, but why implement clean energy production,?
why reduce or restrict excess dependence and consumption on non renewable sources, that is just non feasible, but cattle farts lets get on that ship! million needs breakfast, we do not want to interfere with that, lol
Show ALL Forums  > Science/philosophy  >