Notice: Forums will be shutdown by June 2019

To focus on better serving our members, we've decided to shut down the POF forums.

While regular posting is now disabled, you can continue to view all threads until the end of June 2019. Event Hosts can still create and promote events while we work on a new and improved event creation service for you.

Thank you!

Plentyoffish dating forums are a place to meet singles and get dating advice or share dating experiences etc. Hopefully you will all have fun meeting singles and try out this online dating thing... Remember that we are the largest free online dating service, so you will never have to pay a dime to meet your soulmate.
     
Show ALL Forums  > UK forums  >      Home login  
 AUTHOR
 cwltom
Joined: 5/16/2010
Msg: 26
view profile
History
Islam: The Untold StoryPage 3 of 5    (1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
We obviously mix in different circles day-trader. However most of the non-atheist, non-Christian people I've met and known would describe themselves as spiritual rather than religious.

Obviously a documentary on Mohamed presented by a Muslim will have at least some bias (agreeably in the case of that series, a fair bit), as would one by an atheist. The truth is however often hidden somewhere within both sides of an argument.

As for Jesus being a real man (like Buddha and most of the rest). I do believe he was. I don't believe though that he was the son of God (as Catholicism would have it), just a very wise man. Like with Islam, Christianity took several years to evolve into an established religion and has been edited to give us a certain message - one which is not necessarily entirely that of the Prophet.
 Jo van
Joined: 5/23/2009
Msg: 32
Islam: The Untold Story
Posted: 9/8/2012 4:02:01 AM
I saw the program, I thought it was interesting, though it didn't really come as any surprise to me that most religions make no sense when held up to any objective, rational, or 'scientific' scrutiny. They are all based on the superstitious beliefs of much earlier, 'Neolithic' societies, who had recently (in anthropological terms), made the transition from 'hunter-gatherers' to farming, and settlements.
@ Charity:


I agree with this... I find it laughable that so many people today are convinced of their intellectual superiority over people in the past. It's exactly this kind of arrogance that leads them to dismiss everything that came before.

You are confusing "intellectual superiority" with actual knowledge.
I certainly don't consider myself to be "intellectual superior" to Leonardo Da Vinci, but I certainly know more about how the world "works", than he did.


For example Jesus performed some pretty amazing feats that would have been extremely difficult to fake.

"Eyewitness accounts"..? From people who also claimed to have seen "demons" and "spirits"..?
Do you also believe the "eyewitness accounts", (of which there are many,) from the middle ages, when they "swore on oath", that they had personally witnessed "witches" turning into cats, bats, "devils" etc..? You have to think about context.
There were no "miracles", there never have been. It's nothing but 'Chinese whispers', oral myths, exaggerated, embellished, and finally written down, as "gospel", a word which through their own efforts, has become synonymous with the word "truth", but in reality, is very far removed from that.

It's funny how "believers" cling to the hope of "miracles", if someone gets better, for no apparent reason, they claim it as a "miracle", but when millions die, for no apparent reason, that's not a "miracle".

As possibly the only creature with the intellectual capacity to ponder our own mortality, some choose instead, to either treat death as "bad luck", or driven by egos, some consider their own "importance" to the universe, to be so "indispensable", that once in existence, they become 'worthy' of some form of "immortality".

Newsflash: You're really not that important.

The Universe managed quite nicely without you, for about 13.7 Billion years.



The running diatribe against religion/religious thought, "It causes wars, just to control people" yada-yada, is one aspect of it. Yes, true. Islam is a system of government.

Not just Islam, this country is still little better than a "theocracy". We have unelected bishops in our parliament, the head of state, is also head of the church. The Church of England is an "Established" Religion.
"Blasphemy" laws here, were only recently abolished, though new laws regarding "religious hatred" were introduced (2008?).
It's only recently that we have been able to question or dispute the bible, without it being a criminal offence.
Some countries still have "blasphemy laws", notably Pakistan, where it carries the death sentence.
There is currently a 14 (?) year-old girl, "with learning difficulties", who is "on death row", for allegedly having "burned pages from the Koran. "



The Catholic church and most organised churches are money-making corporations and contravene nearly every commandment in Bible. No worshipping graven images, no other gods before me, call no-one else Father off the top of my head...

IMO Any "creature"/"god" which demands such "worship", is surely unworthy of any respect, let alone "worship".?


With all our advancements in science, why is cancer still rising?

I'm not sure that's true, but it's very much a curable disease now, and it's our "advancements in science" which allowed us to recognise and count the numbers in the first place.
Also, the larger the population grows, the more there will be, of every disease. Apparently, 1 in 3 of us, will die from some form of cancer.


The land produced vegetation: plants bearing seed according to their kinds and trees bearing fruit with seed in it according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good." Well it was good until the last 20 yrs and drug and seed companies have seen fit to control/limit the way the earth naturally feeds us.

2 words: Population Growth.
Just 200 years ago, the world population was about 1 Billion, now it's about 7 billion, and still growing.



None of you smart people can join up the dots... This exact scenario was described over 2,000 yrs ago in, yes, that book of fairy stories, the Bible...

Revelations chapter 13 King James version
16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
Interesting, because science has, in our lifetime developed the technology to do this with a microchip. How do you suppose a Christian guy on a beach figured this out 2,000 yrs ago? A little divine inspiration?

I think you're just getting hysterical now.

I don't doubt that most of the people who "worship" are good people.
I believe that most people are "good", or try to be, regardless of their beliefs. (Though religion is also a very convenient 'camouflage' for some very bad people too)

I think that's the reason most people declare themselves to be "believers" in one "god" or other; to publicly declare themselves to be "good people". (Whichever current definition of that term applies, in our ever-changing and shifting 'morality'.).
People wear the "badge" of religions, to say: "I am a good person".

Religions will continue to endure, amongst some, not because there's any "truth" to any of them, but for purely sociological reasons. Until some alternative, collective way to express that, emerges, a certain type of person will always crave some form of "public recognition", or "belonging" to a "goodness group".

However, science is relentless in it's search for truth, and religions have no immunity.
So inevitably, their myths will be 'busted', regardless of their protestations, or their demands for "respect".
Religions are in decline, simply because they are not the truth.
IMO
 lovepassionx
Joined: 3/12/2012
Msg: 34
view profile
History
Islam: The Untold Story
Posted: 9/9/2012 9:30:36 AM
When does not believing in something mean that you hate it Charity? The problem with beliefs is they're stored in the amygdala and are very tightly linked to emotion, having them questioned creates an unpleasant feeling which makes you defend them even if they're completly false and implanted in your mind by someone else.
 lovepassionx
Joined: 3/12/2012
Msg: 35
view profile
History
Islam: The Untold Story
Posted: 9/9/2012 10:51:01 AM
Look up "cognitive dissonance" If you don't have an urge to defend your beliefs then why do you?
 Jo van
Joined: 5/23/2009
Msg: 36
Islam: The Untold Story
Posted: 9/9/2012 10:58:11 AM

Change the record jo Van you hate Christianity, faith, religion everyone knows....

Don't judge me by your own standards, I "hate" very little, so please don't misrepresent my views. (It's also a forum offence!)
To be honest, I feel a slight sympathy for the people who need to believe. (Most of them, not the liars who teach this BS to children, however "well-meaning" they may claim to be)
You're free to believe in whatever you like, but I don't believe in "christians", "jews", or "muslims" myself. These are just the self-ascribed labels of believers.

Religions are in decline, for the most part, and they currently blame this on "militant/aggressive atheists".
The funny thing is, that it's the 'creed' of most religions to proselytise , to 'evangelize', and to 'convert' people to their 'faiths'.
They have been doing that for centuries, with "missionaries", hence "christanity" in Africa, India, China etc.

And you can't get much more aggressive and militant than the "Knights Templar", who began the current 1000-year war, in the middle-east, all done in the name of religion.
You don't get atheists knocking on doors, only religious people, but still, it's us atheists who are deemed "militant and aggressive".

And that's the thing with religions, they don't just want to follow their own rules privately, themselves, they want to impose them on us non-believers too.
They object to homosexuality, (when they're not too busy buggering small boys,)
They object to many medical practices, blood transfusions, abortions, stem-cell research, transplants... etc. etc.
They object to "working on the sabbath", to drinking, and to masturbation.
They object to freedom of speech. (censorship etc)
They object to gender equality, education for females, to contraception, short skirts, or showing your hair to strangers.

In fact, all three "Abrahamic" faiths are very misogynistic and patriarchal, believing that women are second-class citizens, and should "obey" their masters, the men. (It should come as no surprise that you favour this form of subservience).
They are all in favour (In their "sacred texts") of polygamy, but only ever for the man!
They think that if a woman gets raped, it's probably her fault, for either daring to go out without a chaperone, or dressing "too provocatively".
"God" says in the bible, that if she didn't "cry out" loud enough, she should be stoned to death. (This still happens in some "religious" countries!)
According to "god", rape is often not the man's fault, but the woman's.

All three religions, (Judaisim, christianity, and Islam) are full of violence and death, in their texts.
The sooner people realise that they are based on the primitive beliefs of people thousands of years ago, the safer we'll all be. (IMO)

At best, religious texts are an interesting collection of folk-myths, which give us some insight into the thinking of people a long time ago, and are harmless and benign.
At worst, they perpetuate the death-penalty for anyone who dares to question them, or "disrespect" them.

I don't "hate" religions, or the people who believe, I pity them.
I just prefer the truth, and science's explanations, to the superstitious, primitive beliefs of neolithic farmers.
I don't need to argue with you, the truth is still there, whether I point it out, or not.
It won't change.

 stonecastle
Joined: 2/14/2007
Msg: 38
view profile
History
Islam: The Untold Story
Posted: 9/11/2012 10:33:27 AM
By the way there are now Defence Leagues in muslim countries like Turkey. Google: "Turkish Defence League". This proves beyond doubt that the anti-Islamic extremist defence leagues are not racist or against Islam as such, but are purely against extremism.
 Strider886
Joined: 3/28/2006
Msg: 39
view profile
History
Islam: The Untold Story
Posted: 9/11/2012 12:01:02 PM

By the way there are now Defence Leagues in muslim countries like Turkey. Google: "Turkish Defence League". This proves beyond doubt that the anti-Islamic extremist defence leagues are not racist or against Islam as such, but are purely against extremism.


"RACIST" has long been used to silence and discredit those who express their views in a less than politically correct way (sometimes it's unavoidable).

Unfortunately EDL and BNP have attracted the "wrong sort" due to being labelled racist.
It's literally like "oh they're racists, i'll join them and get chance to FIGHT and beat up foreign people!!!".
They have effectively become racist because of being called racist.

There's another political party out there, the PPUK (Pirate Party UK), they're fighting for the free internet, freedom of speech and our rights to an uncensored internet.
Because they're seen as "anti-establishment", there have been a number of verbal attacks against them and "racist" has already been used against them without logic or reason.

It's frighteningly simple, if you don't like to hear the cold hard truth on ANY subject, just call them racist and watch them burn.
 Jo van
Joined: 5/23/2009
Msg: 40
Islam: The Untold Story
Posted: 9/11/2012 12:11:31 PM

This is what makes me laugh about diversity programs, in one breath they teach that we are all equal but yet they'll go on to promote various religions that completely contradict modern western values and tell us how we should "embrace" and "respect" all cultures and religions.

The people who have encouraged the spread of Islam and Mosques here, are at the top and the far right of our society.
Prince Charles and the Archbishop of Canterbury, and various Bishops have all been vociferous champions for the building of mosques. Prince Charles over-ruled a planning refusal for a huge mosque/islamic study center where I live in Oxford.
To be fair, it's a very pretty building, with turrets and minarets, all done in the same kind of stone that many of the older colleges had used. But it's really a 'phoney', a modern 'disneyesque' replica of a fantasy castle of some sort.
It would have made far more sense (IMO) to have made it from fiber-glass, like the "antique beams" in some newly-refurbished "theme pubs".

I think you have to be fair and reasonable, and as almost the same irrational beliefs have been embraced and encouraged by the 'establishment' here, we can't really refuse. Christianity came from the same origins, and there are thousands of churches. "Christianity" is also a middle-eastern imported religion.

I think that most "muslims", like most "christians", are reasonable people. In my experience, they are much more open to debate about their beliefs, than some christians I've spoken to, who seem to take offence easily and quickly.

The way to stop people believing in these primitive superstitions (IMO) is with rational debate. We now have no blasphemy laws, so it's perfectly valid to question and criticise some of the drivel which appears in all of their "sacred texts".
They are the beliefs of the bronze age.

I have no objections to people living "good lives" though, in fact I think that's an excellent idea.
Morality is not the monopoly of religions, it's perfectly possible to still have morals, and be an atheist.

By the way there are now Defence Leagues in muslim countries like Turkey. Google: "Turkish Defence League". This proves beyond doubt that the anti-Islamic extremist defence leagues are not racist or against Islam as such, but are purely against extremism.


The edl are "extremists"!
They also (rather laughably) embrace the "English religions", and (ironically) use the "Cross of St George" as their emblem. As I said above, all three "Abrahamic Faiths" have their origins in Jerusalem.

I don't feel that marches, and violent confrontation will achieve anything, except more violent confrontation.
If you "go after" people, they tend to close-ranks, and respond predictably, just as you or I would.

We can't criticise "islam", or any other religion, as long as we continue to endorse the same delusions amongst our own population.
That's why I am an "Equal Opportunities Religion-Mocker".

Eventually, as their numbers continue to decline, I prophecise that all three religions will amalgamate, into one huge religion, which embraces the beliefs of all three. CMJ Inc.
They will meet at enormous mega-store sized "Mosynnurches", where they will grow beards, and not eat bacon, together.
The more information we get, the sillier they look.
May his noodly appendage touch you.
 stonecastle
Joined: 2/14/2007
Msg: 51
view profile
History
Islam: The Untold Story
Posted: 9/15/2012 5:21:16 AM
There is a good documentary here about the history of Islam in Europe: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RWQxeF8eVc
It concentrates a lot on Islamic contributions to Europe's civilisation in the realms of science, medicine and culture.
 stonecastle
Joined: 2/14/2007
Msg: 54
view profile
History
Islam: The Untold Story
Posted: 9/17/2012 5:23:44 AM

If Karl Marx only knew how cruel the system inspired by him would be .Are you implying that the gulags in Stanlinist Russia were the best humanity could do ?
What about Mao's China ,was that also Utopia ?
Do I have to mention the current North Korean regime ?

Karl Marx envigished a system of society democratically run by the workers with accountable officials and elected workers councils. And an economic system based on production for need not profit! How does that resemble the regimes of so called communist countries like North Korea? The supportors of capitalism want us to beleive that there is no alternative to wage slave capitalism so they keep repeating the lie that countries like Stalinist Russia were socialist when in reality all their shared with socialism was a planned economy.
 stonecastle
Joined: 2/14/2007
Msg: 56
view profile
History
Islam: The Untold Story
Posted: 9/17/2012 8:44:31 AM
Stonecastle,are you saying Marxist regimes are not inspired by the works of Karl Marx ?

Apart from a planned economy what other policies recommended by Karl Marx in his book the communist manifesto have the regimes of North Korea and the former Soviet Union ever implemented? You should have a look at a British based socialist party and see how different it is from the ideology of those regimes: http://www.socialistworker.co.uk
 lovableladywanted
Joined: 5/14/2006
Msg: 67
Islam: The Untold Story
Posted: 9/25/2012 2:41:31 PM
You have bad and good people in any demographic. I judge each person as an individual not as their complete demographic , whatever that demo is.
 normaldude
Joined: 3/8/2006
Msg: 70
view profile
History
Islam: The Untold Story
Posted: 11/4/2012 3:53:41 PM
But it seems Islam is the most violent and extreme and is always in the news with shocking stories of how the followers are prepared to do anything to strangers and even loved ones to advance this brand of religion...
this child died because somehow the religion is so controlling that the parent feels justified or correct to do this? We have had cases in Canada lately where parents killed ALL their kids because they wouldnt "submit"to the religion and you wonder why people think muslims are nuts?
"Mother murdered son for 'failing to learn the Koran' The Telegraph
A mother murdered her young son and set his body on fire when he struggled to learn the Koran off by heart, a court has heard. Sara Ege used a stick to beat seven-year-old Yaseen “like a dog” if he couldn’t recite passages from the Islamic text.
The beatings were so brutal that the boy died from his injuries, and his mother tried to burn the body to destroy the evidence, Cardiff Crown Court was told.
In a video recording of her interview with police, Mrs Ege told them: “I was trying to teach him the Koran.

“I was getting more and more frustrated. If he didn’t read it properly I would be very angry — I would hit him.
The court heard Mrs Ege, 32, a university graduate, and her husband, Yousuf, had enrolled Yaseen in advanced classes at their local mosque.
They wanted him to become a hafiz — an Islamic term for someone who memorises the Koran.
She also hit him with a hammer, a rolling pin and a slipper, as well as repeatedly punching him, the court heard."
 vlad dracul
Joined: 4/30/2009
Msg: 71
view profile
History
Islam: The Untold Story
Posted: 2/3/2018 4:36:58 AM
Sitting having a cup of bruce lee and i got to thinking about how a certain poster loves to call everyone who disagrees with him as being islamophobic.

Then i minded reading this below. The geezer has the EXACT same views as the poster yet he is not a coward when it comes to islam..........



“Islamophobia: A word created by fascists and used by cowards to manipulate morons.”


Islamophobia”: an absurd term Phobias By LSS member

Jay Marshall Islam: A monotheistic and Abrahamic religion articulated by the Qur’an and considered by many of its adherents to be the verbatim word of Allah; it is also comprised of prophetic traditions (or Hadith) of Muhammad (c. 570–8 June 632 CE), considered by most Muslims to be the last prophet of God.

Phobia: An extremely irrational fear or dislike of something.

I lay out these definitions for my reader so that they may understand the surrounding context of what I will now attempt to articulate.

The term Islamophobia is one which has really shaken up society. Islamophobia is a term which has sought, perhaps, to describe people who are hateful towards Muslims as people yet it has unfortunately come to describe those who are merely critical of the Islamic faith, or who openly refuse to adopt Islamic principles.

The questions I would ask my kind reader are as follows:

Is Islamophobia a useful term? Is it racist to criticise Islam?

An inaccurate word. Have you ever heard of Christianophobia, or Hindiphobia, or Atheistophobia?
Of course you haven’t.

Based on the definitions I have given above, I would have thought it quite obvious that we therefore need to ask ourselves if the term Islamophobia is really necessary at all.

Not only as an atheist, but also as a critic of all religions, it is fair to say I am fairly critical of Islam, and that I have personally concluded that as a way of living Islam is rather awful.

Does this make me “Islamophobic”?

Why?

Because a phobia is a fear or dislike based on irrationality.

My dislike of Islam, as a set of ideas, comes from the rational decisions and judgments I have made after understanding Islam itself, and this dislike of mine is
not groundless or illusory.

An unnecessary word One of the most toxic absurdities this word has produced is that it has conflated criticism of a religion with racism, and this conflation has been made especially by far-left political groups.

One of the freedoms of a democratic society is the freedom of speech and expression, which most certainly includes the freedom to criticise religion.
That some people may find this criticism offensive or insulting is an irrelevance.

If this stupid word Islamophobia is accepted, it automatically closes the door to critical thinking towards Islam as a religion.

A dangerous word. For there are groups of people, both political and religious, who have said that Charlie Hebdo deserved the attacks or that free speech should stop at religion.

The only solidarity such groups profess seems to be with the attackers. It is partly thanks to the term Islamophobia that so many people have found themselves on the wrong side of such a crucial yet straightforward moral issue as the murder of cartoonists for drawing cartoons.

Consequently, people are running scared from people who physically attack those who criticise religion. If this example is to be followed, does it now mean that everyone’s religious belief is subject to the same immunity?

I should hope that never happens. The freedoms of inquiry, philosophy and expression demand the ability to critique religion – all religions.

If there is something we need to change or to reconsider, it is this abhorrent term Islamophobia.

It is not racist to challenge a set of ideas. So let’s remove this word Islamophobia from our vocabularies.

But I’ll give the last word to a tweeter called Andrew Cummins (@VodkaNinja), who defined Islamophobia rather succinctly in the following terms:
“Islamophobia: A word created by fascists and used by cowards to manipulate morons.”

https://lawyerssecularsociety.wordpress.com/2015/03/03/islamophobia-an-absurd-term/

How nice to read a TRUE athiests views as compared to the cowardly types of athiest.
 Jo van
Joined: 5/23/2009
Msg: 72
Islam: The Untold Story
Posted: 2/3/2018 6:28:33 AM

How nice to read a TRUE athiests views as compared to the cowardly types of athiest


^^^Spoken like a "true Scotsman".

No true Scotsman is a kind of informal fallacy in which one attempts to protect a universal generalization from counterexamples by changing the definition in an ad hoc fashion to exclude the counterexample.[1][2] Rather than denying the counterexample or rejecting the original claim, this fallacy modifies the subject of the assertion to exclude the specific case or others like it by rhetoric, without reference to any specific objective rule ("no true Scotsman would do such a thing"; i.e., those who perform that action are not part of our group and thus criticism of that action is not criticism of the group).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman
HTH
 vlad dracul
Joined: 4/30/2009
Msg: 73
view profile
History
Islam: The Untold Story
Posted: 2/3/2018 7:03:12 AM
You know something? You are a fvckin hypocrite. One of the worst ones on here..........


"The left has an Islam problem: If liberals won’t come to terms with religious extremism, the xenophobic right will carry the day.
It’s becoming increasingly difficult to talk honestly about Islam. For liberals in particular, it’s a kind of heresy to suggest that Islam, at this particular moment in history, has a problem.

This is unfortunate, and it has to end.

http://www.salon.com/2015/11/17/the_left_has_an_islam_problem_if_liberals_wont_come_to_terms_with_religious_extremism_the_xenophobic_right_will_carry_the_day/


And peter tatchell describes you to a t...........


"Some liberals and left-wingers mute their condemnation of intolerance when it becomes awkward. The new vogue for sections of the left is the idea that we have to 'understand' bigots from racial and religious minorities; yet few of them ever urge the same 'understanding' of white working class bigots.

Paralysed by the fear of being branded racist, imperialist or Islamophobic, large sections of liberal and left opinion have, in effect, gone soft on their commitment to universal human rights.

They readily, and rightly, condemn the excesses of US and UK government policy, but rarely speak out against oppressors who are non-white or adherents of minority faiths.

Why the double standard?

The answer lies, in part, in a perverse interpretation of multiculturalism that has sundered the celebration of difference from universal human rights.

The new hierarchy of oppression The rights of women and gay people are often deemed expendable for the sake of 'the greater good.'

Misogyny and homophobia are increasingly tolerated in the name of 'maintaining harmonious community relations.'

Indeed, the trend among many supposedly progressive people is to reject common standards of rights and responsibilities. They demand that we 'make allowances' and show 'cultural sensitivity' with regard to the prejudices of people within certain ethnic and faith communities.

Some liberals and left-wingers mute their condemnation of intolerance when it becomes awkward. The new vogue for sections of the left is the idea that we have to 'understand' bigots from racial and religious minorities; yet few of them ever urge the same 'understanding' of white working class bigots.

http://www.petertatchell.net/multiculturalism/democratiya8.htm

Re your true scotsman waffle. You are a true daftie. No disputing that
 Jo van
Joined: 5/23/2009
Msg: 74
Islam: The Untold Story
Posted: 2/3/2018 8:01:24 AM

You know something? You are a fvckin hypocrite. One of the worst ones on here..........


"The left has an Islam problem: If liberals won’t come to terms with religious extremism, the xenophobic right will carry the day.
It’s becoming increasingly difficult to talk honestly about Islam. For liberals in particular, it’s a kind of heresy to suggest that Islam, at this particular moment in history, has a problem.

This is unfortunate, and it has to end.

http://www.salon.com/2015/11/17/the_left_has_an_islam_problem_if_liberals_wont_come_to_terms_with_religious_extremism_the_xenophobic_right_will_carry_the_day/


And peter tatchell describes you to a t...........


"Some liberals and left-wingers mute their condemnation of intolerance when it becomes awkward. The new vogue for sections of the left is the idea that we have to 'understand' bigots from racial and religious minorities; yet few of them ever urge the same 'understanding' of white working class bigots.

Paralysed by the fear of being branded racist, imperialist or Islamophobic, large sections of liberal and left opinion have, in effect, gone soft on their commitment to universal human rights.

They readily, and rightly, condemn the excesses of US and UK government policy, but rarely speak out against oppressors who are non-white or adherents of minority faiths.

Why the double standard?

The answer lies, in part, in a perverse interpretation of multiculturalism that has sundered the celebration of difference from universal human rights.

The new hierarchy of oppression The rights of women and gay people are often deemed expendable for the sake of 'the greater good.'

Misogyny and homophobia are increasingly tolerated in the name of 'maintaining harmonious community relations.'

Misogyny and homophobia and general opposition to "the rights of women and gay people" come from religion.
Not just one religion, but ALL of them.
Religious people tend to be "conservatives" and value "old values", as espoused in various religions.
Opposition to gay marriage came from religious "christian" conservatives, and "lord" mandelson should have told peter about all the "bishops" in the "upper chamber", who pass our laws.

It's also right-wing, religious conservatives who oppose abortion, stem-cell research, transplants, and many other medical advances, because they go against their primitive, superstitious "beliefs" from (literally) the Stone Age.

I don't "have a problem with islam", nor any "double standards", they're all equally deluded, in fact they're all very similar, as they're all based on "the Old Testament", a book of hilarious folk myths, which people have somehow persuaded themselves to be factual.
That's where all the "stoning" women to death, if they've been raped, comes from.

The only "double standards" I can see are the people who think "our" version of another middle-eastern religion is fine, when it believes in exactly the same shit.
And the greatest advocates for the "spread of islam" here, and the "champions" of all the campaigns to get more "mosques" built??
A:= The "christian" church, and all its many rapey priests and bishops.

The "christian churches" seem to be FULL of rapey old men, but peter thinks I've got a "problem" and should focus more on "islam"?
I don't "make any allowances",
The people telling us to "embrace islam" are other religions.
Not atheists.
(Well, not this one anyway)

-That's it.
That's my "5-a-day" used up.
-No, not fruit. Posts.
So if you wish to insult me further, you'll have to wait 'til tomorrow for my reply.
Latersss
 vlad dracul
Joined: 4/30/2009
Msg: 75
view profile
History
Islam: The Untold Story
Posted: 2/3/2018 9:04:44 AM
And once again you miss the point completely. Tatchell is talking about cowards like you who brand others islamophobes whilst ignoring the problems in islam.

We know about the abuse carried out by churches. It is rightly condemned. But IT WAS NOT covered up by politicians, social services and the polis. You are an example of that hypocrisy.........


"How can today's generation of English people be held responsible for what their forebears did 200 years ago in the days of Empire?

Such infantilising nonsense is increasingly a feature of left-wing discourse.

These double standards on human rights influence even law enforcement.

As we all know, no gay person could get away with urging the killing of 'n*ggers.'

Likewise, certain fundamentalist Muslim clerics are permitted to endorse the so-called 'honour' killing of unchaste women; whereas any woman who dared advocate violent retribution against Islamist misogynists would soon find herself in court.

We have long been used to the hypocrisy of the political right.

What is new is that this selective approach to human rights is now being echoed by sections of the left.

The reactionary left condemns torture by US forces in Iraq but ignores the widespread use of torture by the regime in neighbouring Iran.

Closer to home, the race hate of the neo-nazi British National Party provokes left-wing outrage, whereas hatred of Hindus and attempted forced conversions promoted by some Islamist groups is a non-issue for much of the left.

Multiculturalism is cited as a justification for tolerating beliefs and behaviours that conflict with universal human rights.

A good example of this is the veiling of girl children in many Islamic societies - and the attempt by some Islamists to import this sexist oppression into Britain.

We are not talking about the free choice of independent adult women to wear or not wear the hijab, burka or niqab. Girl children have no genuine freedom to choose because they are young and powerless.

Another multiculturalist error has been to bow to demands for 'cultural sensitivity'; permitting some communities to be exempt from the norms of universal human rights when it comes to issues like forced marriages and gay adoption.

The liberal-left used to oppose all oppression .

Nevertheless, in the name of multiculturalism, many otherwise progressive people indulge bigoted racial and religious minorities on the grounds that this bigotry is part of their ethnic and spiritual tradition.

In some quarters, it seems, tradition is now an excuse and analibi for human rights abuses.

The Left goes missing The political somersaults and ethical acrobatics of sections of liberal and left opinion are equally astonishing on the issue of Islamic fundamentalism.

While all Muslims should be defended against prejudice and discrimination, Muslims who oppress others should be challenged (in the same way that oppressor Christians, Judaists, atheists and others should also be challenged).

I have been accused of 'Islamophobia' for defending the Muslim victims of fundamentalism.

Allegations of 'Islamophobia' and 'racism' are increasingly manufactured and manipulated to stop debate, silence critics and discredit opponents.

When I, and others, dared condemn Qaradawi's support for suicide bombing and female genital mutilation, we were denounced as 'Islamophobes.'

In Britain, we hear no left-wing outcry against the homophobia of the Muslim Council of Britain, the Islamic Human Rights Commission and the Muslim Association of Britain.

http://www.petertatchell.net/multiculturalism/democratiya8.htm

And ALL the above could well be written about you.
 Strider886
Joined: 3/28/2006
Msg: 76
view profile
History
Islam: The Untold Story
Posted: 2/4/2018 2:49:08 AM
Little point in arguing this, you won't get anyone to share real thoughts an opinions on this......

The govt, the media, everyone has painted this into a class war, the right are painted out as lower class football hooligans, the left are painted as middle and upper middle class.
What annoys me is that anyone right of centre left, is considered far right.

Anyone aspiring to the later (which is just about everyone in every social class), will simply spout the same political rhetoric, because they can't be bothered to do any research and they fear being ostracised from the social class they pay so much money to feel a part of.

Notice that only people with a working class accent get accused of racism or being Islamophobic, take Douglas Murray for example, he says the same things that the likes of Tommy Robinson say, but nobody tries to shout over him or silence him with these one line put downs, why? because he doesn't have a working class accent........
 rekirked
Joined: 11/7/2017
Msg: 77
Islam: The Untold Story
Posted: 2/4/2018 3:13:41 AM
Any arguments one way or the other to do with religion or politics just end in trench warfare, it’s utterly pointless. You’re better off just worrying about your own little bubble and trying to make it a happy one.
 Jo van
Joined: 5/23/2009
Msg: 78
Islam: The Untold Story
Posted: 2/4/2018 4:15:55 AM

And once again you miss the point completely. Tatchell is talking about cowards like you who brand others islamophobes whilst ignoring the problems in islam.

We know about the abuse carried out by churches. It is rightly condemned. But IT WAS NOT covered up by politicians, social services and the polis. You are an example of that hypocrisy.........


"How can today's generation of English people be held responsible for what their forebears did 200 years ago in the days of Empire?

Such infantilising nonsense is increasingly a feature of left-wing discourse.

These double standards on human rights influence even law enforcement.

As we all know, no gay person could get away with urging the killing of 'n*ggers.'

WTF ??!!
I can't think of any (other) gay people who would want to say that!!
Have you been giving peter some of your drugs?

As for me being "cowardly", actually, being an atheist opens you up to danger from ALL religions, not just one.
Atheists get murdered most, by "believers"

Tell me, what part of all religions are bullshit is me being "selective"?
-Or me "tolerating beliefs"?
Or me "indulging bigoted racial and religious minorities".

I'm not "the liberal left", and I'm not "the Labour Party", London, or otherwise.
I just vote for them, for reasons I've explained.
I'm only responsible for my own behaviour.

There's as much "homophobia" [sic] in "christian" religions, and patriarchy, and misogyny.
Religions want to drag us back to the beliefs of the Stone Age.

See my earlier posts (msg 56ish? and onwards)
We don't "need" religions.
If you (and your new "friend", peter ) want to "attack" somebody, don't attack me, an innocent atheist,
-attack "christianity", they are the ones saying "we should embrace islam", not me.
HTH
 et_non
Joined: 1/26/2018
Msg: 79
view profile
History
Islam: The Untold Story
Posted: 2/4/2018 7:48:38 AM
Emile Zola's La bete humaine is a good book. Should read it sometime.
People don't really control themselves, life is structured in such a way that the bad stuff doesn't come to the fore.
The gubbmint has bankrupted itself trying to pacify it's children, when the source of comfort begins to evaporate due to failing finances the beast will surface.
Show ALL Forums  > UK forums  >